1
|
Martins FE, Lumen N, Holm HV. Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:149-162. [PMID: 38750347 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer treatments are relatively uncommon. However, the combination of the high incidence of prostate cancer and patient longevity after treatment have raised awareness of adverse outcomes deteriorating patients' quality of life. This narrative review discusses the diagnostic work-up and management options for bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostate cancer treatments, including those that require urinary diversion. RECENT FINDINGS The devastated bladder outlet can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments. Regardless of etiology, the initial treatment ladder involves endoluminal options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, with or without intralesional injection of anti-fibrotic agents. If these conservative strategies fail, surgical reconstruction should be considered. Although surgical reconstruction provides the best prospect of durable success, reconstructive procedures are also associated with serious complications. In the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, devastated bladder outlet with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. Urinary diversion with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Thorough patient counseling before treatment selection is of utmost importance. Outcomes and repercussions on quality of life vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation is paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. The risk of bladder outlet obstruction, and its severest form, devastated bladder outlet, after treatment of prostate cancer is not negligible, especially following radiation. Management includes endoluminal treatment, open or robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction, and urinary diversion in the worst circumstances, with varying success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, University of Lisbon, School of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário, Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palminteri E, Morselli S, Cindolo L, Rabito S, Toso S, Gatti L, Ferrari R, Micali S, Ferrari G. Iatrogenic or recurrent bladder neck contracture treated by the Palminteri-Ferrari technique: a new way to approach a frustrating condition. World J Urol 2024; 42:195. [PMID: 38530433 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04912-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bladder neck stricture (BNS) is a bothersome disease which may affect patients after trauma or prostatic surgery. It is frustrating due to the low durable success rate of currently available surgical techniques. The aim of the study is to explore the efficacy of a novel technique. MATERIALS & METHODS The surgical protocol was developed by two high case-volume surgeons. The technique consists of Holmium laser incisions at 3-6-9-12 o'clock. Subsequently, triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg is injected. Two months later, the BNS is endoscopically checked in operatory room and re-procedure take place, if necessary (max 3 times). Failure was defined as the need of definitive urinary diversion. Subjective satisfaction was measured through PGI-I Questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 45 patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 (IQR 59-69) years and BNS developed by different causes. Naïve BNS procedure patients were 12 (26.7%), others 33 (73.3%) underwent median 2 (IQR 1-4) previous urethrotomies, including 16 other surgeries. Suprapubic bladder catheter was present in 34 patients (75.6%). No complications were registered. Re-procedure at control was necessary in 24 patients (53.3%) for a median of 1 (IQR 1-3) procedures. At median follow-up of 18 months, failures were 4 (8.9%) and urinary incontinence was reported in 2 patients (4.5%) who required incontinence surgery. Median PGI-I was 2. CONCLUSIONS Our technique of BNS treatment allows good outcomes and high rate of subjective improvement amongst patients. Moreover, naïve patients seem to have better results. However, longer follow-up and higher sample size are mandatory to further assess these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enzo Palminteri
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| | - Simone Morselli
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy.
| | - Luca Cindolo
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| | - Salvatore Rabito
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Toso
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gatti
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ferrari
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Urology, C.Ur.E., Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, Via Arquà 80, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delchet O, Nourredine M, González Serrano A, Morel-Journel N, Carnicelli D, Ruffion A, Neuville P. Post-prostatectomy anastomotic stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic treatment. BJU Int 2024; 133:237-245. [PMID: 37501631 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic procedures for treating vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) after prostatectomy, as initial VUAS management remains unclear. METHODS A search of the MEDLINE database, the Cochrane database, and clinicaltrials.gov was performed (last search February 2023) using the following query: (['bladder neck' OR 'vesicourethral anastomotic' OR 'anastomotic'] AND ['stricture' OR 'stenosis' OR 'contracture'] AND 'prostatectomy'). The primary outcome was the success rate of VUAS treatment, defined by the proportion (%) of patients without VUAS recurrence at the end of follow-up. RESULTS The literature search identified 420 studies. After the screening, 78 reports were assessed for eligibility, and 40 studies were included in the review. The pooled characteristics of the 40 studies provided a total of 1452 patients, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up of 23.7 (13-32) months and age of 66 (64-68) years. The overall success rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) of all endoscopic procedures for VUAS treatment was 72.8% (64.4%-79.9%). Meta-regression models showed a negative influence of radiotherapy on the overall success rate (P = 0.012). After trim-and-fill (addition of 10 studies), the corrected overall success rate (95% CI) was 62.9% (53.6%-71.4%). CONCLUSION This first meta-analysis of endoscopic treatment success rate after VUAS reported an overall success rate of 72.8%, lowered to 62.9% after correcting for significant publication bias. This study also highlighted the need for a more thorough reporting of post-prostatectomy VUAS data to understand the treatment pathway and provide higher-quality evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophélie Delchet
- Service d'Urologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Mikaïl Nourredine
- Service de Biostatistiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- UMR CNRS 558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Damien Carnicelli
- Service d'Urologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d'Urologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
- Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Neuville
- Service d'Urologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
- Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Uguzova S, Beisland C, Honoré A, Juliebø-Jones P. Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture (BNC) After Radical Prostatectomy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:495-507. [PMID: 37954870 PMCID: PMC10638897 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s350777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder neck contracture is a recognised complication associated with radical prostatectomy. The management can be challenging, especially when refractory to initial intervention strategies. For the patient, the burden of disease is high and continence status cannot be overlooked. This review serves to provide an overview of the management of this recognised clinical pathology. Consideration needs to be given to minimally invasive approaches such as endoscopic incision, injectables, implantable devices as well as major reconstructive surgery where the condition persists. For the latter, this can involve open and robotic surgery as well as use of grafts and artificial sphincter surgery. These elements underline the need for a tailored and a patient centred approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Uguzova
- Department of Urology, Stepping Hill Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Alfred Honoré
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Franco A, Ditonno F, Manfredi C, Johnson AD, Mamgain A, Feldman-Schultz O, Feng CL, Pellegrino AA, Mir MC, Porpiglia F, Crivellaro S, De Nunzio C, Chow AK, Autorino R. Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:453-470. [PMID: 37842031 PMCID: PMC10575039 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s386025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a transformative technology, revolutionizing surgical approaches and techniques that decades ago could barely be imagined. The field of urology has taken charge in pioneering a new era of minimally invasive surgery with the ascent of robotic systems which offer enhanced visualization, precision, dexterity, and enabling surgeons to perform intricate maneuvers with improved accuracy. This has led to improved surgical outcomes, including reduced blood loss, lower complication rates, and faster patient recovery. The aim of our review is to present an evidence-based critical analysis on the most pioneering robotic urologic approaches described over the last eight years (2015-2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Urology Unit, “Luigi Vanvitelli” University, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Carol L Feng
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Antony A Pellegrino
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Simone Crivellaro
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh A, Sharma R, Agrawal A, Surwase PP, Patil A, Batra R, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Outcomes of Hem-o-Lok clip migration at vesico-urethral anastomotic site post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single centre experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1467-1475. [PMID: 36976419 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03554-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is the most preferred intervention for the management of prostatic malignancy worldwide. Hem-o-Lok clips (HOLC) are widely used for haemostasis and lateral pedicle ligation. These clips are prone to migrate and lodge at the anastomotic junction as well as inside the bladder causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to bladder neck contracture (BNC) or bladder calculi. The objective of this study is to describe the incidence, clinical presentation, management, and outcome of HOLC migration. METHODOLOGY Retrospective analysis of the database of Post RALP patients who developed LUTS secondary to HOLC migration was done. Cystoscopy findings, number of procedures required, number of HOLC removed intra-operatively, and follow-up of the patients was reviewed. RESULTS The incidence of HOLC migration requiring intervention was 1.78% (9/505). The mean age of the patient, BMI, Pre-operative Serum PSA were 62.8 years, 27.8 kg/m2, and 9.8 ng/mL, respectively. The mean duration of appearance of symptoms due to HOLC migration was 9 months. Two patients presented with Haematuria and 7 presented with LUTS. Seven patients required a single intervention while 2 required up to 6 procedures for recurrent symptoms secondary to recurrent HOLC migration. CONCLUSION HOLC use in RALP may present with migration and associated complications. HOLC migration is associated with severe BNC and may require multiple endoscopic interventions. Severe dysuria and LUTS not responding to medical management should be treated using an algorithmic approach and there should be a low threshold for performing cystoscopy and intervention in these cases to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Singh
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
| | - Rohan Sharma
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Anshul Agrawal
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | | | - Abhijit Patil
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Rohan Batra
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Arvind Ganpule
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Ravindra Sabnis
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| | - Mahesh Desai
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sayegh AS, La Riva A, Perez LC, Medina LG, Poncel J, Ortega DG, Lizana MA, Forsyth E, Sotelo R. Robotic Simultaneous Repair of Rectovesical Fistula With Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stricture after Radical Prostatectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and Outcomes. Urology 2023:S0090-4295(23)00164-4. [PMID: 36822246 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience and outcomes using a novel robotic technique for the simultaneous repair of rectovesical fistula (RVF) with vesicourethral anastomotic stricture (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Between 2019 and 2021, four consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted simultaneous repair of RVF with concurrent VUAS after RP were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were examined and reported. Complications were graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system and the European Association of Urology Complications Panel Assessment and Recommendations. RESULTS Four cases with a median age of 68.5 (63.3-72.3) years were treated. Interposition omentum flaps were used in all our cases. One case had perineal urethral mobilization to reach healthy urethral margins and tension-free vesicourethral anastomosis. Surgeries were uneventful, with no intraoperative complications reported. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 370 (291.3-453) minutes, 255 (175-262.5) mL, and 2.5 (2-3) days, respectively. Median Jackson-Pratt drains, Double-J stents and Foley catheter removal days were 6 (6-10), 38 (32-43), and 30 (27-41) days, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up time was 16.25 (12-26) months, and no fistula recurrence was shown. CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair could represent an effective approach for the simultaneous repair of RVF with concomitant VUAS. More studies and management standardization are needed to assess the role of the robotic platform in the simultaneous repair of RVF with VUAS after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aref S Sayegh
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anibal La Riva
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Laura C Perez
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Luis G Medina
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jaime Poncel
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David G Ortega
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maria A Lizana
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edward Forsyth
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rene Sotelo
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abbosov S, Sorokin N, Shomarufov A, Kadrev A, Nuriddinov KU, Mukhtarov S, Akilov F, Kamalov A. Bladder neck contracture as a complication of prostate surgery: Alternative treatment methods and prospects (literature review). UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_127_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
9
|
Teke K, Bosnali E, Kara O, Ustuner M, Avci IE, Culha MM. Minimal invasive management of bladder neck contracture using Allium round posterior stent: the long-term results. Prostate Int 2021; 9:203-207. [PMID: 35059358 PMCID: PMC8740101 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical efficacy of temporary, Allium round posterior stent (RPS) used for treatment of recurrent bladder neck contracture (BNC). Methods Records of 42 patients with recurrent BNC who underwent Allium RPS placement after bladder neck incision, between 2009 and 2019, were analyzed. After stent removal, the success criteria for Allium RPS treatment were defined as: no evidence of stricture on urethrogram or endoscopy; more than 12 ml/sec of urinary peak flow; and no recurrent urinary tract infections. Based on clinical success, patients were divided into two groups and compared. Clinical success was evaluated with particular regard to stent indwelling time and contracture etiology. Results The mean ± standard deviation age, stricture length, and indwelling time were 66.7 ± 9 years, 2.4 ± 1.4 cm, and 7.7 ± 2.2 months, respectively. Median (range) follow-up was 59 (8–73) months. The etiologies of BNC in this cohort were 57.1% retropubic radical prostatectomy; and 42.9% transurethral resection of prostate. Overall clinical success was achieved in 64.3% and the success rates did not differ by etiology. The success rates were 54.2% and 77.8% (P = 0.118) for retropubic radical prostatectomy and transurethral resection of prostate, respectively. Longer indwelling time (8–14 vs 3–7, months) was significantly associated with clinical success (78.3% vs 47.4%, P = 0.040). Conclusion Our data suggest that better clinical success was associated with longer indwelling time for stent in BNC treatment. In BNC management, Allium RPS treatment may be considered since its clinical efficacy is acceptable and tolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerem Teke
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Baki Komsuoğlu avenue No: 515, Umuttepe Campus, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
| | - Efe Bosnali
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Onder Kara
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Murat Ustuner
- Department of Urology, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim E. Avci
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Mustafa M. Culha
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martins FE, Holm HV, Lumen N. Devastated Bladder Outlet in Pelvic Cancer Survivors: Issues on Surgical Reconstruction and Quality of Life. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4920. [PMID: 34768438 PMCID: PMC8584541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder outlet obstruction following treatment of pelvic cancer, predominantly prostate cancer, occurs in 1-8% of patients. The high incidence of prostate cancer combined with the long-life expectancy after treatment has increased concerns with cancer survivorship care. However, despite increased oncological cure rates, these adverse events do occur, compromising patients' quality of life. Non-traumatic obstruction of the posterior urethra and bladder neck include membranous and prostatic urethral stenosis and bladder neck stenosis (also known as contracture). The devastated bladder outlet can result from benign conditions, such as neurogenic dysfunction, trauma, iatrogenic causes, or more frequently from complications of oncologic treatment, such as prostate, bladder and rectum. Most posterior urethral stenoses may respond to endoluminal treatments such as dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and occasionally urethral stents. Although surgical reconstruction offers the best chance of durable success, these reconstructive options are fraught with severe complications and, therefore, are far from being ideal. In patients with prior RT, failed reconstruction, densely fibrotic and/or necrotic and calcified posterior urethra, refractory incontinence or severe comorbidities, reconstruction may not be either feasible or recommended. In these cases, urinary diversion with or without cystectomy is usually required. This review aims to discuss the diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for patients with bladder outlet obstruction with a special emphasis on patients unsuitable for reconstruction of the posterior urethra and requiring urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E. Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria/CHULN, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Greenwell MTJ. EDITORIAL COMMENTS. Urology 2021; 152:107. [PMID: 34112331 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ms Tamsin J Greenwell
- Honorary Associate Professor University College London, Consultant Urological Surgeon University College London Hospitals, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G8PH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wen L, Köhler TS, Helo S. A narrative review of the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients undergoing penile prosthesis surgery. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2695-2704. [PMID: 34295754 PMCID: PMC8261430 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Penile prosthesis surgery is an effective and durable treatment modality for patients who have failed conservative management for erectile dysfunction (ED). Thorough patient counseling and appropriate preoperative workup lay the foundation for a successful outcome. While the risk of infection of penile prosthesis is rare, it is a dreaded complication with dire consequences. The goal of the prosthetic surgeon is to minimize the risk of preventable complications. Given the common prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in this patient population, it is essential that providers are familiar with the implications and nuances of managing both conditions in order to maximize the chances of a favorable result. Due to the relatively infrequent nature of complications associated with the management of BPH in the setting of a penile prosthesis, literature regarding this topic is scarce. In this narrative review we present our own case series illustrating some of the most common scenarios that a prosthetic surgeon may encounter. We have included our suggestions for management in these difficult situations based on our clinical experience. In the following review we have highlighted the importance of identifying and treating BPH in penile implant candidates to reduce postoperative morbidity and to offer critical insights into managing BPH-related complications this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sevann Helo
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vitarelli A, Vulpi M, Divenuto L, Papapicco G, Pagliarulo V, Ditonno P. Prerectal-transperineal approach for treatment of recurrent vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy. Asian J Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
14
|
Transurethral Incision with Transverse Mucosal Realignment for the Management of Bladder Neck Contracture and Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis. Urology 2021; 152:102-108. [PMID: 33766717 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess efficacy and safety of a novel cystoscopic technique for definitive repair of bladder neck contracture (BNC) and vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS). METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent a transurethral incision with transverse mucosal realignment between July 2019 and December 2020 by a single surgeon was completed. This is novel procedure of incising a scar cystoscopically and using a laparoscopic suturing device transurethrally to bring healthy bladder mucosa across the defect, like a YV plasty. Patients were only included if they had ≥4 months follow-up. Surgical success was defined as ability to pass a 17 French flexible cystoscope through the previously stenotic segment at 4 month follow up. RESULTS Nineteen patients with a median follow-up of 6 months were included in this analysis. Etiology of posterior urethral stenosis was 53% from VUAS and 47% from BNC, with 32% of patients having prior pelvic radiation. Success was achieved in 89% of patients after 1 procedure and 100% of patients achieved success after a second procedure. There was no de novo incontinence or major complications. CONCLUSION Transurethral incision with transverse mucosal realignment for VUAS and BNC has a high success rate after only 1 procedure. This is the first reported series of an endoscopic Y-V plasty type repair for BNC and VUAS. Longer term follow up to ensure durability and reporting from other institutions will be needed to establish reproducibility.
Collapse
|
15
|
Branche B, Crocerossa F, Carbonara U, Klausner AP, Roseman JT, Hampton LJ, Autorino R. Management of Bladder Neck Contracture in the Age of Robotic Prostatectomy: An Evidence-based Guide. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:297-301. [PMID: 33531288 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of bladder neck contracture (BNC), or postprostatectomy vesicourethral anastomosis, has declined since the advent of robotic surgery. However, men with peripheral vascular comorbidities, among other factors, still have a high risk of developing this complication after any surgery that involves manipulation of the prostate. The best strategy for BNC management remains uncertain because of inconsistency in success for different approaches across studies. We reviewed the available evidence on BNC, including the results for endoscopic treatments, scar modulation therapies, and open and robotic bladder neck reconstruction. On the basis of these data, we propose a management flowchart. Patient baseline status and subjective goals and preferences remain crucial in management choices. PATIENT SUMMARY: Contracture of the bladder neck can occur as a complication after surgery to the prostate. We reviewed the evidence for various treatment approaches and propose a flowchart for management of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandee Branche
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Adam P Klausner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - John T Roseman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Lance J Hampton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
[Urethro-vesical anastomosis reconstruction using extra-peritoneal robot-assisted laparoscopy for anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:591-597. [PMID: 33468413 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urethro-vesical anastomosis stenosis following radical prostatectomy is a rare complication but represents a challenging situation. While the first-line treatment is endoscopic, recurrences after urethrotomies require a radical approach. We present the updated results of our patient's cohort treated by pure robotic anastomosis refection. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective, single-center study focusing on one surgeon's experience. Patients presented an urethro-vesical stricture following a radical prostatectomy. Each patient received at least one endoscopic treatment. The procedure consisted of a circumferential resection of the stenosis, followed by a re-anastomosis with well-vascularized tissue. We reviewed the outcomes in terms of symptomatic recurrences and continence after the reconstructive surgery. RESULTS From April 2013 to May 2020, 8 patients underwent this procedure. Half of the patients had previously been treated with salvage radio-hormonotherapy. The median age was 70 years (64-76). The mean operative time was 109minutes (60-180) and blood loss was 120cc (50-250). One patient had an early postoperative complication, with vesico-pubic fistula. The average length of stay was 4.6 days (3-8). Mean follow-up was 24.25 months (1-66). Half of the patients experienced a recurrence at a median time of 8.25 months (6-11) after surgery. Five patients experienced incontinence of which 3 required an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. CONCLUSION Extra-peritoneal robot-assisted urethro-vesical reconstruction is feasible and safe to manage bladder neck stricture after radical prostatectomy. The risk of postoperative incontinence is high, justifying preoperative information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rosenbaum CM, Fisch M, Vetterlein MW. Contemporary Management of Vesico-Urethral Anastomotic Stenosis After Radical Prostatectomy. Front Surg 2020; 7:587271. [PMID: 33324673 PMCID: PMC7725760 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.587271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis is a well-known sequela after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and has significant impact on quality of life. This review aims to summarize contemporary therapeutical approaches and to give an overview of the available evidence regarding endoscopic interventions and open reconstruction. Initial treatment may include dilation, incision or transurethral resection. In treatment-refractory stenoses, open reconstruction via an abdominal (retropubic), transperineal or combined abdominoperineal approach is a viable option with high success rates. All of the open surgical procedures are generally accompanied by a high risk of developing de novo incontinence and patients may need further interventions. In such cases, subsequent artificial urinary sphincter implantation is the most common treatment option with the best available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
[Anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy and bladder neck stenosis after benign prostate hyperplasia treatment: reconstructive options]. Urologe A 2020; 59:398-407. [PMID: 32055934 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Bladder neck stenosis (BNS) after simple prostatectomy and vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer are common sequelae. However, the two entities differ in their pathology, anatomy and their surgical results. VUAS has an incidence of 0.2-28%. Commonly, VUAS occurs within the first 2 years after surgery. Initial therapy should be performed endourologically: dilatation, (laser) incision or resection. After three unsuccessful treatment attempts, open reconstruction should be considered. Different surgical approaches (abdominal, perineal, abdominoperineal) have been described. All are associated with good success rates. However, they are accompanied by high rates of urinary incontinence. Incontinence can be treated safely by implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter. The incidence of BNS is around 5% for all types of surgery for benign prostate hyperplasia. It occurs within the first 2 years after surgery. Initial treatment should be performed endourologically. In case of recalcitrant BNS, open reconstruction is indicated. The YV-plasty is an established procedure, and the T‑plasty represents a modification. Success rates of both procedures are high. Robot-assisted reconstructive procedures have been described for both VUAS and BNS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis after Prostate Cancer Treatment. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-019-00539-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
20
|
Brachytherapy for the urologist: A multidisciplinary team update for 2019. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415819841703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Brachytherapy is a well-established treatment for localised prostate cancer. Urologists are often tasked with discussing all available treatment options with the newly diagnosed patient. Unlike radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy, knowledge of brachytherapy may be limited. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date guide on patient selection, modern brachytherapy techniques and the management of side effects, such that the core urologist can be more confident in both discussing initial treatment options and the long-term management of brachytherapy patients. Level of Evidence: Level 5 - review article
Collapse
|
21
|
Lavollé A, de la Taille A, Chahwan C, Champy CM, Grinholtz D, Hoznek A, Yiou R, Vordos D, Ingels A. Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Vesicourethral Reconstruction to Manage Anastomotic Stricture Following Radical Prostatectomy. Urology 2019; 133:129-134. [PMID: 31381896 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction. Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy is a real challenge for reconstructive surgery when facing several endoscopic management failures. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a case series of robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction for anastomotic stricture failing endoscopic management. The procedure was performed with an extraperitoneal approach. The fibrotic anastomotic region was resected and a new vesicourethral running suture was performed with well-vascularized tissue. Bladder catheter was removed after 7 days. RESULTS Six procedures were performed from April 2013 to May 2018 at our department. One patient had a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our department; the 5 others were referred from other institutions after receiving open prostatectomies. Three patients had salvage radiation therapy before reconstruction. Mean age was of 73.8 years (68-82). There was no peroperative complication. Mean operative time was of 108 minutes (60-180)], with a mean estimated blood loss of 130 mL (50-300). After surgery, 3 patients presented recurrences managed endoscopically without recurrence after 3, 5, and 11 months. Three patients presented incontinence treated with artificial sphincter implantation. One patient had no residual symptom after 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction is a safe procedure. It is an option to consider when facing recurring anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. It is an alternative to the perineal approach and an option before urinary diversion. Patients should be informed of the risks of incontinence and recurrence before surgery especially if they had radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Andras Hoznek
- Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Rene Yiou
- Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kirshenbaum EJ, Zhao LC, Myers JB, Elliott SP, Vanni AJ, Baradaran N, Erickson BA, Buckley JC, Voelzke BB, Granieri MA, Summers SJ, Breyer BN, Dash A, Weinberg A, Alsikafi NF. Patency and Incontinence Rates After Robotic Bladder Neck Reconstruction for Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis and Recalcitrant Bladder Neck Contractures: The Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Experience. Urology 2018; 118:227-233. [PMID: 29777787 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review a robotic approach to recalcitrant bladder neck obstruction and to assess success and incontinence rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with a recalcitrant bladder neck contracture or vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis who underwent robotic bladder neck reconstruction (RBNR) were identified. We reviewed patient demographics, medical history, etiology, previous endoscopic management, cystoscopic and symptomatic outcomes, urinary continence, and complications. Stricture success was anatomic and functional based upon atraumatic passage of a 17 Fr flexible cystoscope or uroflowmetry rate >15 ml/s. Incontinence was defined as the use of >1 pad per day or procedures for incontinence. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2017, 12 patients were identified who met study criteria and underwent RBNR. Etiology of obstruction was endoscopic prostate procedure in 7 and radical prostatectomy in 5. The mean operative time was 216 minutes (range 120-390 minutes), with a mean estimated blood loss of 85 cc (range 5-200 cc). Median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-5 days). Three of 12 patients had recurrence of obstruction for a 75% success rate. Additionally, 82% of patients without preoperative incontinence were continent with a median follow-up of 13.5 months (range 5-30 months). There was 1 Clavien IIIb complication of osteitis pubis and pubovesical fistula that required vesicopubic fistula repair with pubic bone debridement. CONCLUSION RBNR is a viable surgical option with high patency rates and favorable continence outcomes. This is in contrast to perineal reconstruction, which has high incontinence rates. If future incontinence procedures are needed, outcomes may be improved given lack of previous perineal dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lee C Zhao
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Jeremy B Myers
- Division of Urology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Sean P Elliott
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Alex J Vanni
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
| | - Nima Baradaran
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Jill C Buckley
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Bryan B Voelzke
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Benjamin N Breyer
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Atreya Dash
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Aaron Weinberg
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Browne BM, Vanni AJ. Management of Urethral Stricture and Bladder Neck Contracture Following Primary and Salvage Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:76. [PMID: 28776126 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discusses the incidence, evaluation, and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction from urethral stricture, vesicourethral anastomotic stricture, and bladder neck contracture following primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Rates of stenosis after prostate cancer treatment appear similar across all primary treatment modalities including radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound in contemporary series. Urethral dilation and urethrotomy continue to report moderate patency rates. Urethroplasty achieves high patency rates even for long strictures, but more extensive reconstruction increases the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence. Recent AUA guidelines on urethral strictures provide new recommendations for management of these patients. All treatment options for prostate cancer carry a risk for bladder outlet obstruction, and intervention is often necessary to relieve long-lasting morbidity. Careful preoperative evaluation should be completed to assess location and extent of the stricture in order to choose optimal therapy. Endoscopic treatments, open reconstruction, and urinary diversion all play a role in relief of stenosis depending on stricture length, location, characteristics, and patient comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Michael Browne
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Alex J Vanni
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rocco NR, Zuckerman JM. An update on best practice in the diagnosis and management of post-prostatectomy anastomotic strictures. Ther Adv Urol 2017; 9:99-110. [PMID: 28588647 PMCID: PMC5444622 DOI: 10.1177/1756287217701391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Postprostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) remains a challenging problem for both patient and urologist. Improved surgical techniques and perioperative identification and treatment of risk factors has led to a decline over the last several decades. High-level evidence to guide management is lacking, primarily relying on small retrospective studies and expert opinion. Endourologic therapies, including dilation and transurethral incision or resection with or without adjunct injection of scar modulators is considered first-line management. Recalcitrant VUAS requires surgical reconstruction of the vesicourethral anastomosis, and in poor surgical candidates, a chronic indwelling catheter or urinary diversion may be the only option. This review provides an update in the diagnosis and management of postprostatectomy VUAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack M Zuckerman
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Spector BL, Brooks NA, Strigenz ME, Brown JA. Bladder Neck Contracture Following Radical Retropubic versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. Curr Urol 2017; 10:145-149. [PMID: 28878598 DOI: 10.1159/000447169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) are co-standard surgical therapies for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. These surgical modalities offer similar outcomes; however, lower rate of bladder neck contracture (BNC) is amongst the touted benefits of RALP. The differences between approaches are largely elucidated through multiple-surgeon comparisons, which can be biased by differential experience and practice patterns. We aimed to eliminate inter-surgeon bias through this single-surgeon comparison of BNC rates following RRP and RALP. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all RRPs and RALPs performed by one surgeon over 4 years. We compared clinical characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS RRP patients had more advanced cancer and a higher biochemical recurrence rate. No significant differences were noted between groups in rates of anastomotic leakage, BNC, or 12-month postoperative pad-free continence. CONCLUSION RRP offers similar outcomes to RALP with regard to postoperative urinary extravasation, urinary continence, and BNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan A Brooks
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - James A Brown
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nicholson HL, Al-Hakeem Y, Maldonado JJ, Tse V. Management of bladder neck stenosis and urethral stricture and stenosis following treatment for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:S92-S102. [PMID: 28791228 PMCID: PMC5522805 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to examine all urethral strictures and stenoses subsequent to treatment for prostate cancer, including radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and cryotherapy. The overall majority respond to endoscopic treatment, including dilatation, direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) or bladder neck incision (BNI). There are adjunct treatments to endoscopic management, including injections of corticosteroids and mitomycin C (MMC) and urethral stents, which remain controversial and are not currently mainstay of treatment. Recalcitrant strictures are most commonly managed with urethroplasty, while recalcitrant stenosis is relatively rare yet almost always associated with bothersome urinary incontinence, requiring bladder neck reconstruction and subsequent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, or urinary diversion for the devastated outlet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L. Nicholson
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Yasser Al-Hakeem
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Vincent Tse
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Secondary bladder neck sclerosis represents one of the more frequent complications following endoscopic, open, and other forms of minimally invasive prostate surgery. Therapeutic decisions depend on the type of previous intervention (e.g., radical prostatectomy, TURP, HoLEP, radiotherapy, HIFU) and on associated complications (e.g., incontinence, fistula). Primary treatment in most cases represents an endoscopic bilateral incision. No specific advantages of any type of the applied energy (i.e., mono-/bipolar HF current, cold incision, holmium/thulium YAG laser) could be documented. Adjuvant measures such as injection of corticosteroids or mitomycin C have not been helpful in clinical routine. In case of first recurrence, a transurethral monopolar or bipolar resection can usually be performed. Recently, the ablation of the scared tissue using bipolar vaporization has been recommended providing slightly better long-term results. Thereafter, surgical reconstruction is strongly recommended using an open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted approach. Depending on the extent of the bladder neck sclerosis and the underlying prostate surgery, a Y-V/T-plasty, urethral reanastomosis, or even a radical prostatectomy with new urethravesical anastomosis should be performed. Stent implantation should be reserved for patients who are not suitable for surgery. The final palliative measure is a cystectomy with urinary diversion or a (continent) cystostomy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Purkait B, Sinha RJ, Srinivas KSA, Bansal A, Sokhal AK, Singh V. Outcome analysis of transurethral resection versus potassium titanyl phosphate-photo selective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia; a randomized controlled trial with 4 years follow up. Turk J Urol 2017; 43:176-182. [PMID: 28717543 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.20586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Photovaporization of prostate (PVP) is a newer surgical modality of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) which is gaining importance recently. There are a few randomized controlled trials that showed safety and efficacy of PVP in comparison with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) with limited follow-up period (<2 years). Here, we are presenting a comparative study performed on potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) PVP laser versus TURP for the treatment of BPH with long-term follow-up period. MATERIAL AND METHODS After institutional ethical clearance, 150 patients were prospectively included in the study from January 2010 to March, 2012. Improvement of International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), Qmax, post-void residual (PVR) urine, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score and complications were assessed at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. RESULTS Mean age of the study group was 65.3±7.86 years in the TURP and 63.6±8.12 years in the PVP groups (p=0.45). IPSS symptom score improved significantly in both TURP and KTP groups (p<0.003). There was improvement in Q max during follow-up in both groups (p<0.001) which was maintained at 48 months. Most of the patients in both groups were satisfied with symptoms and bothersome at 48 months. All the sexual parameters are similar to both groups except retrograde ejaculation. Overall complication noted in 23 patients (15.33%). CONCLUSION Both KTP Laser PVP and TURP afford durable relief from symptoms of BPH at 48 months follow-up. Both procedures are safe and associated with minimal complications. Both procedures do not have any detrimental effect on sexual function on long-term follow-up. Quality of life remains high even at 4 years in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bimalesh Purkait
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rahul Janak Sinha
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - Ankur Bansal
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ashok Kumar Sokhal
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Vishwajeet Singh
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pfalzgraf D, Siegel FP, Kriegmair MC, Wagener N. Bladder Neck Contracture After Radical Prostatectomy: What Is the Reality of Care? J Endourol 2017; 31:50-56. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pfalzgraf
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Fabian P. Siegel
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C. Kriegmair
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nina Wagener
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kaplan JR, Lee Z, Eun DD, Reese AC. Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Management. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17:47. [PMID: 27075019 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-016-0602-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery, including both traditional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic approaches, has increasingly become the standard of care for urologic abdominal and pelvic surgery. This is a comprehensive review of the contemporary literature regarding complications of laparoscopic and robotic urologic surgery. The review highlights pertinent studies with the goal of providing the minimally invasive urologic surgeon with an up-to-date overview of general and procedure-specific complications and their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Kaplan
- Temple University School of Medicine, 3509 North Broad Street, 6th Floor, Boyer Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA
| | - Ziho Lee
- Temple University School of Medicine, 3509 North Broad Street, 6th Floor, Boyer Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA
| | - Daniel D Eun
- Temple University School of Medicine, 3509 North Broad Street, 6th Floor, Boyer Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA
| | - Adam C Reese
- Temple University School of Medicine, 3509 North Broad Street, 6th Floor, Boyer Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pucheril D, Campbell L, Bauer RM, Montorsi F, Sammon JD, Schlomm T. A Clinician's Guide to Avoiding and Managing Common Complications During and After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2:30-48. [PMID: 28723448 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is on the advance globally, and it is essential for surgeons and patients to know the rates of perioperative complications. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on avoiding and managing common complications during and after RARP in the context of a comprehensive literature review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION In concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2015 statement guidelines, a literature search of the PubMed database from August 1, 2011, to August 31, 2015, using the predefined search terms robot* AND radical prostatectomy, was conducted. The search resulted in 653 unique results that were subsequently uploaded to DistillerSR (Evidence Partners, Ottawa, Canada) for team-based screening and processing of references. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Median rate of overall complication was 12.6% (range: 3.1-42%). Most of the complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2). Grade 3 complications comprised the bulk of the major complications with a median rate of 2.7%; grade IV and V complications were exceedingly rare in all reports. CONCLUSIONS Despite continued adoption of the RARP technique globally, rates of overall complication remain low. Many of the complications experienced during and after RARP can be mitigated and prevented by experience and the implementation of safe techniques. PATIENT SUMMARY Despite continued adoption of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) technique globally, rates of overall and major complications remain low at 12.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Complications can be minimized and successfully managed using established techniques. RARP is a safe and reproducible technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pucheril
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Logan Campbell
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ricarda M Bauer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jesse D Sammon
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kragelj B. Obstructive urination problems after high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost treatment for prostate cancer are avoidable. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:94-103. [PMID: 27069455 PMCID: PMC4825344 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2015-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aiming at improving treatment individualization in patients with prostate cancer treated with combination of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy to boost the dose to prostate (HDRB-B), the objective was to evaluate factors that have potential impact on obstructive urination problems (OUP) after HDRB-B. Patients and methods In the follow-up study 88 patients consecutively treated with HDRB-B at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in the period 2006-2011 were included. The observed outcome was deterioration of OUP (DOUP) during the follow-up period longer than 1 year. Univariate and multivariate relationship analysis between DOUP and potential risk factors (treatment factors, patients’ characteristics) was carried out by using binary logistic regression. ROC curve was constructed on predicted values and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated to assess the performance of the multivariate model. Results Analysis was carried out on 71 patients who completed 3 years of follow-up. DOUP was noted in 13/71 (18.3%) of them. The results of multivariate analysis showed statistically significant relationship between DOUP and anti-coagulation treatment (OR 4.86, 95% C.I. limits: 1.21-19.61, p = 0.026). Also minimal dose received by 90% of the urethra volume was close to statistical significance (OR = 1.23; 95% C.I. limits: 0.98-1.07, p = 0.099). The value of AUC was 0.755. Conclusions The study emphasized the relationship between DOUP and anticoagulation treatment, and suggested the multivariate model with fair predictive performance. This model potentially enables a reduction of DOUP after HDRB-B. It supports the belief that further research should be focused on urethral sphincter as a critical structure for OUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borut Kragelj
- Institut of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Management of Bladder Neck Contracture in the Prostate Cancer Survivor. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00040-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
34
|
Sotelo RJ, Haese A, Machuca V, Medina L, Nuñez L, Santinelli F, Hernandez A, Kural AR, Mottrie A, Giedelman C, Mirandolino M, Palmer K, Abaza R, Ghavamian R, Shalhav A, Moinzadeh A, Patel V, Stifelman M, Tuerk I, Canes D. Safer Surgery by Learning from Complications: A Focus on Robotic Prostate Surgery. Eur Urol 2015; 69:334-44. [PMID: 26385157 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake of robotic surgery has led to changes in potential operative complications, as many surgeons learn minimally invasive surgery, and has allowed the documentation of such complications through the routine collection of intraoperative video. OBJECTIVE We documented intraoperative complications from robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the aim of reporting the mechanisms, etiology, and necessary steps to avoid them. Our goal was to facilitate learning from these complications to improve patient care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Contributors delivered videos of complications that occurred during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy between 2010 and 2015. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Surgical footage was available for a variety of complications during RARP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Based on these videos, a literature search was performed using relevant terms (prostatectomy, robotic, complications), and the intraoperative steps of the procedures and methods of preventing complications were outlined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS As a major surgical procedure, RARP has much potential for intra- and postoperative complications related to patient positioning, access, and the procedure itself. However, with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, we suggest that the majority of such complications are preventable. CONCLUSIONS Considering the complexity of the procedure, RARP is safe and reproducible for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Insight from experienced surgeons may allow surgeons to avoid complications during the learning curve. PATIENT SUMMARY Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has potential for intra- and postoperative complications, but with a dedicated approach, increasing experience, a low index of suspicion, and strict adherence to safety measures, most complications are preventable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René J Sotelo
- Center of Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Instituto Médico La Floresta, Caracas, Venezuela; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Alexander Haese
- Martini Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Victor Machuca
- Center of Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Instituto Médico La Floresta, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Luis Medina
- Center of Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Instituto Médico La Floresta, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Luciano Nuñez
- Center of Robotics and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Instituto Médico La Floresta, Caracas, Venezuela
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ronney Abaza
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Arieh Shalhav
- Duchossois Center for Advanced Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alireza Moinzadeh
- Lahey Hospital and Medical Center Institute of Urology, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Vipul Patel
- Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA
| | | | - Ingolf Tuerk
- St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA, USA
| | - David Canes
- Lahey Hospital and Medical Center Institute of Urology, Burlington, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Pariser JJ, Saltzman GB, Bales GT, Steinberg GD, Smith ND. Outcomes of the Endoscopic Treatment of Bladder Neck Contractures in the Orthotopic Neobladder. Urology 2015; 86:613-7. [PMID: 26142714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Revised: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the outcomes of endoscopic procedures for bladder neck contracture (BNC) in the orthotopic neobladder (ONB) after radical cystectomy focusing on success rates for patients who require multiple treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent treatment for cystoscopically confirmed BNC in an ONB from 2007 to 2014 were studied. Treatment information included procedure type, use of adjuvant clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), and follow-up procedures. Procedures followed by additional interventions were categorized as failures. Success was defined as no additional surgical procedure with at least 1 year of follow-up. Procedures were classified by a number of prior endoscopic treatments. RESULTS Seventy-one patients underwent 155 individual endoscopic procedures (146 urethrotomy, 3 dilation, and 6 transurethral resection of bladder neck). All patients were male without prior radiation. Median follow-up after initial endoscopic treatment was 26.8 months (interquartile range: 16.6-51.7), and time to recurrence was 3.5 months (1.6-6.3). Success was experienced for 50 of 136 individual procedures (37%) after excluding 19 procedures for inadequate follow-up. Success rates remained 25%-43% even after multiple prior interventions. Adjuvant CIC was associated with a higher success rate (14/24 or 58%) compared to procedures without CIC (36/112 or 32%, P = .02). Successful outcomes were seen in 50 of 71 patients (73%) with 2 patients requiring ONB removal. CONCLUSION Individual endoscopic treatments of BNC in the ONB were met with 37% success. The rate did not decrease with subsequent procedures. Adjuvant CIC improved the outcomes. Overall, a successful outcome was achieved for most patients, but the majority required more than one procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Pariser
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Gabriel B Saltzman
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Gregory T Bales
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Norm D Smith
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bai Y, Pu C, Yuan H, Tang Y, Wang X, Li J, Wei Q, Han P. Assessing the Impact of Barbed Suture on Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology 2015; 85:1368-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2014] [Revised: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
38
|
Best Evidence Regarding the Superiority or Inferiority of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2014; 41:493-502. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|