Head and neck lymphoedema-research challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic

Evaluating the effects of lymphoedema management strategies on functional status and health-related quality of life following treatment for head and neck cancer: Protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Patients living with and after head and neck cancer often experience treatment-related consequences. Head and neck lymphoedema can be described as a common chronic side effect of head and neck cancer and recognised as a contributing factor to impairment of functional status, symptom burden and health-related quality of life. The effects of head and neck lymphoedema can limit patients' involvement in daily activities and alter their appearance, increasing symptom burden and negatively affecting health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The protocol outlines the rationale and aims for the systematic review. The main aim of the systematic review is to identify and systematically synthesise the literature on the effectiveness of head and neck lymphoedema management strategies, on both function status and health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol will be conducted according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. Electronic databases will be systematically searched using MEDLINE via Ovid and PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus. Inclusion criteria will involve intervention studies for head and neck lymphoedema management, English language, and adult human participants following head and neck cancer. The software Covidence will be used to export, manage, and screen results. Risk of bias and quality will be assessed in included studies using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Intervention risk of bias and GRADE tools. A meta-analysis will be performed if there are sufficient homogenous studies. Alternatively, a narrative synthesis will be completed on study findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical approval is required as the study does not involve patient and public involvement. The findings of the review will be disseminated in conferences and submitted for approval to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022378417. (S1 Appendix).

Evaluating the effects of lymphoedema management strategies on functional status and health-related quality of life following treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Patients living with head and neck lymphoedema (HNL) after completion of head and neck cancer (HNC) often can experience long-term functional challenges and overall poorer health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This systematic review aims to explore components of effective HNL interventions through identification and synthesising literature on existing HNL management interventions.

METHODS

Five electronic databases (MEDLINE via Ovid and PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus) were systematically searched using Medical Subject Headings and free text, as well as citation tracking and Google Scholar for grey literature.

RESULTS

A total of 1910 studies were screened, with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated vast heterogeneity within HNL interventions. Patients' adherence to intervention strategies was reported as low and partially adhered to, particularly at home. This impacted on function domains and overall HRQOL during the post-treatment HNC phase, as well as further increasing the demands placed on healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthesis of the research findings highlighted a need to provide and educate patients with individualised HNL self-management intervention strategies. Promoting adherence was reported as being essential, with self-efficacy and behaviour change techniques being emphasised as a critical element to enhance motivation and therefore effective intervention delivery. Further work is important to address barriers to adherence and promote both motivation and behaviour change, to develop individualised self-management interventions for this cancer population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The findings from this systematic review will provide guidance in the development and delivery of individualised self-management HNL interventions for patients who have completed HNC treatment.

COVID-19-related disruptions in implementation of a randomized control trial: An autoethnographic report

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The SARS-Cov-2 virus (COVID-19) has not only threatened the health of the world's population but also presented challenges for conducting human subject research studies. Although many institutions have now established guidelines for conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic, reports of the practical experiences of researchers are limited. This report presents the challenges nurse researchers encountered when conducting a randomized controlled trial to develop an arthritis self-management application during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan and how researchers responded to the challenges.

METHODS

Qualitative data from five nurse researchers were collected from August 2020 to July 2022 at a rheumatology clinic in northern Taiwan. This collaborative autoethnographic report was drawn from data comprised of detailed field notes and weekly discussions regarding research challenges we were confronting. Data were analyzed to determine successful strategies employed to overcome the challenges and allow for completion of the study.

RESULTS

Minimizing the risk of exposure to the virus for researchers and participants resulted in four major challenges to conducting our research: patient screening and recruitment, delivery of the intervention, obtaining follow-up data, and unanticipated budget increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges reduced sample size, altered intervention delivery, increased time and money beyond what was originally budgeted, and delayed completion of the study. Adapting to a new healthcare environment required flexibility for recruitment, alternate means of providing intervention instructions, and an awareness of disparities in participants' internet proficiency. Our experiences can serve as an example for other institutions and researchers faced with similar challenges.