Improving maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with gestational diabetes through continuity of midwifery care: A cross-sectional study

PROBLEM

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a complication of pregnancy which may exclude women from midwife-led models of care.

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of research evaluating the safety and feasibility of continuity of midwifery care (CoMC) for women with GDM.

AIM

To investigate the impact of CoMC on maternal and neonatal outcomes, for otherwise low-risk women with GDM.

METHODS

This exploratory cross-sectional study observed maternal and neonatal outcomes including onset of labour, augmentation, labour analgesia, mode of birth, perineal trauma, gestation at birth, shoulder dystocia, infant birth weight, neonatal feeding at discharge.

FINDINGS

Participants were 287 otherwise low-risk pregnant women, who developed GDM, and either received CoMC (n=36) or standard hospital maternity care (non-CoMC) (n=251). Women with GDM who received CoMC were significantly more likely to experience an spontaneous onset of labour (OR 6.3; 95% CI 2.7-14.5; p<.001), labour without an epidural (OR 4.2; 95% CI 2.0 - 9.2,<0.001) and exclusively breastfeed (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.26 - 14.32; p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

Receiving CoMC may be a public health initiative which not only improves maternal and neonatal outcomes, but also long-term morbidity associated with GDM.

CONCLUSION

Findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting CoMC improves maternal and neonatal outcomes and is likely a safe and viable option for otherwise low-risk women with GDM. Larger studies are recommended to confirm findings and explore the full impact of CoMC for women with GDM.

Development and validation of the 'Knowledge of Gestational Diabetes (GDM)' questionnaire among a sample of women with GDM in Australia

OBJECTIVE

At present, there are few validated tools that measure women's knowledge of GDM and no tool was located, that measured effective self-management of GDM. To address this gap, this study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the 'Knowledge of GDM' questionnaire, for use by pregnant women.

METHODS

A total of 116 pregnant women, with recently diagnosed GDM, were recruited from a public hospital in Australia. Content validity, construct validity, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were undertaken as part of the validation process.

RESULTS

The questionnaire performed well in terms of content validity and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability indicated that the instrument was effective at measuring knowledge of GDM over time.

CONCLUSION

we concluded that the Knowledge of GDM questionnaire is a reliable and valid measure of GDM knowledge, nutrition values and self-management principles.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The questionnaire can be used to effectively determine knowledge gaps and the information needs of pregnant women with GDM. This information can then be used to improve health literacy and provide targeted support for women to better self-manage GDM.