A comparative study of negative pressure wound therapy with and without instillation of saline on wound healing

One Year of Experience in the Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgical Care of War Refugees and Soldiers from Ukraine in a Maximum Care Trauma Centre

According to the United Nations, around 8,400 people have been injured and over 5,800 killed on the Ukrainian side in the Ukraine war, which has been going on for over 14 months. Extensive humanitarian aid operations were carried out to support Ukraine, so that war-wounded people from Ukraine were also cared for in Germany. In a retrospective cohort study, 10 patients were examined who were treated in the department between February 24th 2022 and February 24th 2023, using the cloverleaf system from Ukraine.The average duration of inpatient treatment was 53.10 days. The average ISS was 23.7. The patients were operated on an average of 3.3 times in our institution. All patients received consultative psychological care. All patients were initially put into protective isolation until the results of a corona test and microbiological swabs were available. After preliminary protective isolation, further isolation had to be carried out in 5 cases due to germs requiring isolation. Eight patients were released to state accommodation. Three patients were transferred back to Ukraine at their own request.The treatment of war-injured patients from Ukraine represents a particular challenge. It absolutely requires an interdisciplinary treatment concept that, in addition to special trauma surgery and orthopaedic expertise, also requires plastic-reconstructive, microbiological and, last but not least, psychological care. Due to the high rate of infections requiring isolation, long, costly therapy with multiple revision operations is often necessary.

Evolving Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell Time (NPWTi-d-) in Management of Trauma and Orthopaedic Wounds: Mechanism, Applications and Future Perspectives

Introduction

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is a well-established method to promote wound healing by delivering negative pressure (a vacuum) at the wound site. Enhancement of NPWT techniques may allow an innovative way of treating trauma and orthopaedic wounds which provide unique challenges. We explore the role of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d-) in the management of trauma and orthopaedic wounds.

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted using databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library with the search words of 'NPWTid' or 'NPWTi-d-' or 'NPWT with instillation' or 'Negative pressure wound treatment with instillation' to generate this narrative review. The mechanism of action of NPWTi-d-, installation solutions and current applications in the trauma and orthopaedic wounds is evaluated.

Results

NPWTi-d- provides additional mechanism to promote wound healing in a spectrum of acute and chronic orthopaedic wounds. The technique allows local delivery of hydration and elution of antibiotics to support growth of healthy granulation tissue. Various mechanism of actions contribute in drawing the wound edges together, reduce oedema, help decontamination, deliver local antibiotic and promote healing.

Conclusion

NPWTi-d- permits an enhanced, supplementary technique to encourage wound healing in challenging traumatic and orthopaedic wounds. Future applications of NPWTi-d- will depend on cost-effectiveness analysis and development of its application guidelines based on longitudinal, randomized controlled research trials.

Effects of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) versus NPWT or standard of care in orthoplastic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a wound-dressing system that applies sub-atmospheric pressure on the surface of a wound to promote healing. An evolution of this technology, NPWT with solution instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d), is increasingly being used to maximise wound closure and reduce failure rates. However, there is still a lack of evidence concerning its use in orthoplastic surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare NPWTi-d with NPWT and standard of care for wound management in orthoplastic surgery. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 15 March 2022 was performed, including studies describing the outcomes of NPWTi-d for traumatic/orthopaedic injuries. A meta-analysis on the number of surgical debridements, as well as the rate of complete wound closure and complications was carried out, although for other outcomes, a descriptive statistic was applied. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Downs& Black's Checklist for Measuring Quality. Thirteen studies with a total number of 871 patients were included, in which NPWTi-d demonstrated significantly higher primary wound closure and lower complication rates (P < .05). No difference in the number of surgical procedures required for final wound healing was observed. Moreover, five out of six studies showed better results for NPWTi-d when the change of the bioburden and bacterial count of the wound were analysed. A singular study investigating the length of the hospital stay of patients treated with NPWTi-d showed a reduction in the latter. The present meta-analysis proves that NPWTi-d is superior to NPTW or conventional dressings in orthoplastic wound care management, in terms of complete wound closure rate and the reduced number of complications. Still, the limited quality of the studies analysed shows that future randomised studies are needed to confirm the benefits and to identify the most appropriate recommendations for using NPWTi-d in orthoplastic surgery, as well as to investigate the cost-effectiveness of this wound-dressing system.

Is There a Wound Recontamination by Eluates with High Bacterial Load in Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell Time?

BACKGROUND

This study investigated bacterial colonization of the foam eluate after negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) to obtain an indication of possible recontamination of the wound during NPWTi-d. To detect bacterial colonization and the extent of planktonic and nonplanktonic bioburden as comprehensively as possible, routine culture and molecular biology methods were used.

METHODS

Before (time point 1) and after (median 3.0 days; time point 2) NPWT ( n = 15) and NPWTi-d with antiseptic installation ( n = 15), wound bed [22 acute, eight chronic wounds; median age, 51 years (range, 24 to 91); 26 men], foam, and eluate were examined by routine culture methods and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction, and FISH sequencing (FISHseq).

RESULTS

At time point 2, 94.9% (37 of 39) of the pathogens identifiable in the eluate were also detected in the wound bed. Foam and eluate were always bacterially contaminated. NPWTi-d resulted in a significant reduction in the number of pathogen species compared with NPWT (NPWTi-d, time point 1 versus time point 2: P = 0.026; NPWT, time point 1 versus time point 2: not significant). Routine culture of wound bed samples at time point 2 identified only 28 of 52 (53.8%) of the pathogens, whereas examination of wound bed, foam, and eluate and additional FISHseq use detected 50 of 52 (96.2%) of the bacterial species. FISHseq identified biofilm in one and microcolonies in 10 wounds (time point 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The bacterial load of the foam is flushed back into the wound during NPWTi-d. FISHseq should be used in addition to the routine culture method when pathogen identification and detection of nonplanktonic bacterial growth is particularly important for the patient's therapy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

The Effect of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation Compared to Current Standard Care on Wound Closure Time of Infected Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Infected wounds extend healing time and are associated with higher treatment costs than noninfected wounds. Several observational studies indicate that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation can effectively reduce bacterial bioburden and improve wound healing. Only a few randomized trials with small sample sizes have been published, and a meta-analysis directly comparing negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation to current standard care is lacking. It is therefore uncertain whether negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation actually improves wound healing. The authors performed a systematic review and hypothesized that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation reduces wound closure time.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to December of 2020 for English studies that compare negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation-to either negative-pressure wound therapy without instillation or to other types of wound care-for the treatment of acute or chronically infected wounds. Time to wound closure was analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis in predefined subgroups according to study design and comparative wound care.

RESULTS

The authors identified 14 studies describing 1053 patients. Meta-analysis of three randomized trials shows no significant difference in time to wound closure between negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation and that without (mean difference, 0.48 day; 95 percent CI, -0.70 to 1.65; I ² = 0 percent). Data from eleven observational studies indicate that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation reduces wound closure time (from 1.6 to 16.8 days; no pooled data). Because of imprecision and risk of bias, the available evidence provides only low-level certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to support or discard the use of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation for infected wounds. More randomized trials are needed to determine whether a beneficial effect can be substantiated.

Emerging treatment strategies in wound care

Wound healing is a complex process in tissue regeneration through which the body responds to the dissipated cells as a result of any kind of severe injury. Diabetic and non-healing wounds are considered an unmet clinical need. Currently, different strategic approaches are widely used in the treatment of acute and chronic wounds which include, but are not limited to, tissue transplantation, cell therapy and wound dressings, and the use of an instrument. A large number of literatures have been published on this topic; however, the most effective clinical treatment remains a challenge. The wound dressing involves the use of a scaffold, usually using biomaterials for the delivery of medication, autologous stem cells, or growth factors from the blood. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory drugs are also used to stop the infection as well as accelerate wound healing. With an increase in the ageing population leading to diabetes and associated cutaneous wounds, there is a great need to improve the current treatment strategies. This research critically reviews the current advancement in the therapeutic and clinical approaches for wound healing and tissue regeneration. The results of recent clinical trials suggest that the use of modern dressings and skin substitutes is the easiest, most accessible, and most cost-effective way to treat chronic wounds with advances in materials science such as graphene as 3D scaffold and biomolecules hold significant promise. The annual market value for successful wound treatment exceeds over $50 billion US dollars, and this will encourage industries as well as academics to investigate the application of emerging smart materials for modern dressings and skin substitutes for wound therapy.

Research progress on negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in the treatment of orthopaedic wounds

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) has the dual function of negative pressure sealing drainage and irrigation, which overcomes the disadvantages of NPWT, such as tube obstruction, inability to apply topical medicine, and poor anti‐infection ability. NPWTi has been researched extensively and widely used in various types of wounds, and certain effects have been achieved. A series of parameters for NPWTi have not been unified at present, including the flushing fluid option, flushing mode, and treatment period. This paper reviews the research progress of these parameters for NPWTi and their application in the treatment of orthopaedic wounds.

Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time: An Overview

SUMMARY

The use of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become an established therapy for wound management. There have been many advancements in the technology of NPWT including NPWT with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d). NPWTi-d promotes wound healing by wound cleansing, irrigation, and nonexcisional debridement. NPWTi-d has been shown in comparative clinical studies to decrease the time to definitive wound healing and length of hospitalization. NPWTi-d-using a reticulated open-cell foam dressing with "through" holes (ROCF-CC)-has been postulated to facilitate solubilization, detachment, and elimination of infectious materials, such as slough and thick exudate, before or after operative debridement, and in cases where surgical debridement is not an option. The authors provide an overview on the use of NPWTi-d by reviewing the components of the system, proposed mechanism of action, clinical outcomes, and current consensus guidelines for its utilization.

Effects of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation versus Standard of Care in Multiple Wound Types: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Large randomized controlled trials that evaluate the effects of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation of a topical solution and dwell time (NPWTi-d) are lacking. There is a need to synthesize existing data across multiple studies to provide a more precise estimate of the clinical effects of NPWTi-d.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies were performed to determine the effects of NPWTi-d versus control therapy in the adjunctive management of complex wounds. Weighted standardized mean difference or odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to pool study and control group results in each publication for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies comprising 720 patients were included in the analysis. Significantly fewer surgical debridements were performed in NPWTi-d patients versus control patients (P = 0.01). Wounds in the NPWTi-d group were ready for closure faster than control wounds (P = 0.03). The odds of reducing bacterial count from baseline in the NPWTi-d group was 4.4 times greater than control group wounds (P = 0.003), and percent reduction of bacterial count in NPWTi-d wounds was evident in all studies that captured that endpoint. There was a significantly shorter length of therapy in NPWTi-d patients versus control patients (P = 0.03). Wounds in NPWTi-d group were 2.39 times more likely to close than control group wounds (P = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was not significantly reduced for NPWTi-d patients compared with that for control patients (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis show a positive effect with use of NPWTi-d in various wound types.

NPWTi allows safe delayed free flap repair of Gustilo IIIb injuries: A prospective case series

Introduction

Free flap lower extremity repair is associated with a high complication rate (>31%); higher rates are observed in more severe patients. In cases requiring prior systemic/local stabilization, delayed repair increases complication rate (+10% at 7 days): Negative-pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) decreases complications but only when applied for less than 7 days. Recent limited evidence suggests that augmentation of NPWT with instillation for wound irrigation (NPWTi) might safely extend such window. This study hypothesizes that, through the combined cleansing effect of NPWT and instillation, NPWTi allows safe (low complication rate) delayed free flap repair in severe patients with Gustilo IIIb injuries (GIIIb).

Methods

A prospective case series was designed (inclusion criteria: GIIIb requiring microsurgical repair, severe patient/injury condition preventing immediate/early repair; exclusion criteria: allergy to NPWTi dressing). Patients received NPWTi (suction: 125 mmHg continuous; irrigation: NaCl 0.9%) until considered clinically ready for repair. Preoperative/postoperative complications (dehiscence, wound infection, bone non-union, osteomyelitis, flap failure) were monitored with clinical signs, imaging, and serum markers (CRP, WBC).

Results

Four patients (male: N = 4, female N = 1; Age: 59 [44-75] years-old) were treated. NPWTi was applied for 15.2 [9-28] days. No complication (0%) was observed preoperatively or postoperatively. Delayed repair occurred by latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (N = 3), and anterolateral thigh flap (N = 2). All patients walked weight-bearing 12 [6-20] weeks after injury.

Conclusions

NPWTi seems to allow safe delayed free flap repair in patients with severe lower extremity injuries unable to undergo immediate/early repair.

Experience with negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation in complex infected orthopaedic wounds

Chronic exudative wounds are frequently seen in hospitalised patients, consuming hospital resources and leading to increased morbidity. Negative‐pressure therapy (NPWT) with topical instillation “NPWTi” may be used to improve the wound healing process, with the unique features (removal of wound exudate, edema reduction, promotion of tissue perfusion and granulation tissue formation, as well as drawing the edges of the wound to facilitate, in addition to the cyclic cleansing mechanism). This report is a descriptive study of our experience with NPWTi on complex infected orthopaedic wounds as a potential method to decrease the need for multiple surgical debridements required for the closure of such wounds. A prospective observational study was conducted. Twenty patients with complex infected orthopaedic wounds were enrolled in our study. These patients were consulted by the Bone and Joint Infection Service and enrolled to receive NPWTi intraoperatively and to be used during their inpatient stay. Twenty patients with 20 complex infected lower limb wounds were included in our study. Of all the 20 wounds, the etiology was post‐surgical in 80% (n = 16) and post‐traumatic in 20% (n = 4). None of the patients received previous treatment with conventional NPWT before participation in the study. There were 11 males (55%) and 9 females (45%) with an average age of 57 years (22‐83). All wounds were located in the lower limbs, with 25% leg (n = 5), 20% thigh (n = 4), 20% knee (n = 4), 20% foot (n = 4), 10% heel (n = 2), and 5% ankle (n = 1). The average length of treatment with NPWTi was 5.2 days (2‐10). Successful wound closure within 6 weeks was achieved in 65% of the cases (n = 13). Of the closed wounds (n = 13), 54% (n = 7) were closed primarily and 46% (n = 6) were closed by secondary procedures (skin graft or skin flap). NPWTi is still considered a novel technique that can be used in the management of complex wounds, and the goal of this prospective study is to report our experience with NPWTi in the management of complex infected orthopaedic lower limb wounds. Randomised control studies with optimally matched wounds comparing NPWTi to the conventional methods of treatment are warranted.

Efficacy of delayed primary closure with intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment after surgery for colorectal perforation

AIM

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) often occur after surgery for colorectal perforation. We introduced delayed primary closure (DPC) after intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment (IW-CONPIT) to prevent SSIs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DPC after IW-CONPIT compared with primary closure (PC) after surgery for colorectal perforation.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study including 22 patients who underwent DPC (DPC group) and 18 patients who underwent PC (PC group) at our hospital between April 2015 and January 2017. The primary outcome was the SSI rate. The secondary outcomes were other complications (<30 days), length of hospital stay, and costs.

RESULTS

The SSI rate was significantly lower in the DPC group than in the PC group (40% vs. 94%, P = 0.0006). Moreover, superficial and deep incisional SSIs, infectious complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 2 complications were also significantly diminished in the DPC group. Conversely, the length of hospital stay and costs were not significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that the significant independent protective factor against SSI after surgery for colorectal perforation was DPC after IW-CONPIT (odds ratio 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.25).

CONCLUSION

Delayed primary closure after IW-CONPIT reduced SSIs after surgery for colorectal perforation compared with PC.

Clinical application and efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d): A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study evaluates the current clinical evidence of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and dwell time (NPWTi‐d) to establish its clinical application and efficacy. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from 1946 to July 2019 for studies reporting clinical outcomes on wounds treated with NPWTi‐d. The primary outcome was proportion of wounds with complete healing. The secondary outcomes were mean time for healing, NPWTi‐d settings, cost, length of stay, and adverse events. Thirteen articles were included with a total of 624 wounds in 542 patients involving wounds of various aetiology. The pooled proportion of wound that achieved complete healing was 93.65% (95%CI: 84.02‐99.04). Normal saline was the most commonly used instillation solution with the mean dwell time of 14.23 minutes (95%CI: 10.88‐17.59) and instillation cycle every 4.17 ± 2.32 hourly. The mean therapy duration was 10.69 days (95%CI: 10.46‐10.91) with daily cost of $194.80. The mean hospital stay was 18.1 days (95%CI: 17.20‐19.00). There were no severe adverse effects reported. NPWTi‐d is an adjuntive therapy to aid complete healing of the vast majority of wounds. However, the current data are limited by the lack of level 1 evidence.

Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With and Without Instillation of Saline in the Management of Infected Wounds

Background 

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) includes periodic instillation of topical solution into the wound followed by a negative pressure. Our objective was to evaluate potential differences in wound outcomes in patients receiving NPWT and those receiving NPWTi-d using saline.

Methods

An analysis was performed using two previously published independent studies from a single investigator and hospital to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of infected wounds from 74 NPWT-treated patients with 42 NPWTi-d-treated patients.

Results 

Patient demographics and comorbidities, wound etiologies, and anatomical locations of wounds were similar between groups, although a significantly higher percentage of NPWT-treated patients had end-stage renal disease (P = 0.0119). Compared with patients treated with standard NPWT, NPWTi-d-treated patients had a significantly lower number of operations (P = 0.0048), shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.0443), shorter time to final surgical procedure (P = 0.0001), higher percentage of closed wounds (P = 0.0004), and a higher percentage of wounds that remained closed at one month (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

The results of this analysis suggest that management of infected wounds with NPWTi-d using saline leads to favorable wound outcomes when compared to those managed with NPWT.

Complex Wound Management Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time in a Cancer Care Setting

INTRODUCTION

Unresolved wound healing represents a major health care cost with a negative impact on patient quality of life, especially among oncology patients who exhibit a delay in the wound healing cascade due to chemotherapy and radiation. In order to address this problem, the author utilized negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) to cleanse wounds of debris and help promote healing.

OBJECTIVE

The author examines the impact of NPWTi-d on multiple indicators of wound healing progress in 6 cancer patients with complex wounds and multiple comorbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NPWTi-d was initiated with instillation of normal saline or 0.125% hypochlorite solution, which was allowed to dwell for 3 to 20 minutes, followed by 2 to 3.5 hours of -125 mm Hg continuous negative pressure. Dressing changes were performed every 2 to 3 days. Debridements, incision and drainage, and antibiotics were administered as necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 1 woman and 5 men (average age, 62 years; range, 53-78 years) presented with the following wounds: surgical dehiscence (n = 3), pressure injury (n = 1), chronic seroma (n = 1), and abdominal wall abscess (n = 1). Malignancy was not detectable in any wounds. Patient comorbidities included diabetes, hypertension, and past treatment for cancers. The NPWTi-d was applied for 1 to 2 weeks, after which the wounds exhibited a reduction in slough, an improvement in granulation tissue, and a decrease in wound volume. Wounds were closed with a flap or transitioned to conventional NPWT prior to discharge home or to a rehabilitation facility for outpatient recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

As shown in this case series, NPWTi-d was a beneficial tool for cleansing the wound bed, thus creating a moist, closed wound environment conducive to healing. Using NPWTi-d supported the formation of a healthy wound bed and contributed to rapid, positive outcomes in this patient population.

Benefits of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds: a case series

Objective:

Impaired wound healing can lead to hard-to-heal wounds, which impact on patients, clinicians and healthcare systems. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) was developed to manage wounds through early-stage cleansing. This study describes the use of NPWTi-d to help manage hard-to-heal wounds in patients with risk factors for impaired wound healing.

Method:

In this case series, patients were treated between October 2015 and March 2018 at a community hospital in western France. Normal saline solution was instilled into wounds with a dwell time of 10 minutes, followed by the application of negative pressure at −75 mmHg to −125 mmHg for 2–3 hours. If needed, patients were given appropriate oral or intravenous antibiotic treatment in conjunction with NPWTi-d and subsequent wound therapies.

Results:

A total of 15 patients participated in the study. Mean age was 81±13 years, and 12 (80%) patients were malnourished with blood albumin levels of 30.1±5.7g/l, and 12 (80%) patients were given antibiotic therapy. The mean duration of NPWTi-d was 19.4±20.8 days, with a mean number of dressing changes of 6.6±6.8; the duration of NPWTi-d and the number of dressing changes for pressure ulcers was three times that of the other wound types. The mean cost of NPWTi-d in this study was €1643.40±€1709.13. Overall, NPWTi-d provided early-stage wound cleansing and helped achieve adequate granulation tissue formation and progression to the next phase of wound healing.

Conclusion:

In these cases, NPWTi-d was a beneficial and effective method of treating hard-to-heal wounds that were resistant to traditional treatments, yielding favourable clinical outcomes.

Does negative pressure wound therapy with irrigation improve clinical outcomes? A randomized clinical trial in patients with diabetic foot infections

AIM

To compare the efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) with and without irrigation with 0.1% polyhexanide-betaine.

METHODS

We randomized 150 subjects in a 16-week RCT to compare healing in patients with diabetic foot infections. NPWT delivered at 125 mm Hg continuous pressure. NPWT-I were administered at 30 cc per hour.

RESULTS

There were no differences clinical treatment or outcomes: wound area after surgery (18.5 ± 19.0 vs. 13.4 ± 11.1 cm2, p = 0.50), duration of antibiotics (39.7 ± 21.0 vs. 38.0 ± 24.6 days, p = 0.40), number of surgeries (2.3 ± 0.67 vs. 2.2 ± 0.59, p = 0.85), duration of NPWT (148.1 ± 170.4 vs. 114.5 ± 135.1 h, p = 0.06), healed wounds (58.7% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.86), time to healing (56.3 ± 31.7 vs. 50.7 ± 27.8, p = 0.53), length of stay (13.8 ± 6.4 vs. 14.5 ± 11.2 days, p = 0.42), re-infection (20.0% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.69, and re-hospitalization (17.3% vs. 18.7, p = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of irrigation to NPWT did not change clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot infections.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT02463487, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Randomized clinical study to compare negative pressure wound therapy with simultaneous saline irrigation and traditional negative pressure wound therapy for complex foot infections

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices and NPWT with and without simultaneous irrigation in patients admitted to hospital with moderate and severe foot infections. Ninety patients were randomized in a 12‐week prospective, randomized noninferiority trial to compare wound healing in patients with moderate and severe infected foot wounds treated with NPWT after surgery. Inclusion criteria included ABI > 0.5 or toe pressures >30 PVR/mmHg, >18 years of age and exclusion included active Charcot arthropathy, collagen vascular disease, HIV, and hypercoagulable state. We compared two different traditional devices, NPWT‐K (KCI, VAC Ulta) and NPWT‐C (Cardinal, PRO), and NPWT‐I with saline irrigation (Cardinal, PRO). All patients had therapy delivered at 125 mmHg continuous pressure. In patients who received simultaneous saline irrigation (NPWT‐I), the administration rate was 15 ml per hour. The primary outcome was the proportion of healed wounds in 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included surgical wound closure, number of surgeries, length of stay, and time to wound healing. Continuous data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables and chi‐square to compare dichotomous variables with an alpha of 0.05. There were no differences in outcomes among NPWT‐I, NPWT‐C, and NPWT‐K groups in proportion of healed wounds (63.3%, 50.0%, 46.7% p = 0.39), surgical wound closure (83.3%, 80.0%, 63.3%, p = 0.15), number of surgeries (2.0 ± 0.49, 2.4 ± 0.77, 2.4 ± 0.68, p = 0.06), length of stay (16.3 ± 15.7, 14.7 ± 7.4, 15.3 ± 10.5 days, p = 0.87), time to wound healing (46.2 ± 22.8, 40.9 ± 18.8, 45.9 ± 28.3 days, p = 0.78). We did not identify any significant differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events between patients treated with different NPWT devices or NPWT with and without irrigation.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation as Conservative Management for a Large Abdominal Wound Following Incarcerated Parastomal Hernia Repair

Parastomal herniation is a common complication following stoma creation, necessitating surgical repair in up to one-quarter of cases, including emergency cases of incarceration or strangulation. Following hernia repair with or without mesh placement, surgical sites are at risk of infection post-operatively and this is typically resolved by removing the mesh, which can be technically challenging. Few studies have assessed conservative management options for these types of cases. Here, we present a case where negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation was utilized for secondary intention healing of a large abdominal wound (20 cm x 23 cm x 5 cm) following mesh infection post-parastomal hernia repair. The patient’s wound was completely healed after eight weeks and she had no long-term complications at the one-year follow-up. NPWT with instillation is an option for the conservative management of large abdominal wounds, which can be considered on a case-by-case basis.

A Novel Method for Fracture Blister Management Using Circumferential Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell

High- and low-energy fractures can result in nearby skin blistering. These so-called "fracture blisters" can be troublesome in the face of surgery and currently no uniform consensus regarding their management exists. Preoperatively, we used circumferential negative pressure wound therapy with sterile saline instillation (NPWT-id) to treat two patients with closed fractures who had developed significant skin blistering. This technique resulted in near complete re-epithelialization of the decompressed blister beds within one week. Furthermore, no excessive surgical delay or alteration in surgical approach was necessary, and both patients healed successfully without post-operative wound complications. Thus, circumferential NPWT-id may be a worthwhile treatment option for fracture blisters.

Diabetic wound management

Diabetes is a global disease, and its prevalence has increased rapidly in the last century. Many complications are associated with diabetes, and diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are common. There is a variety of different treatments for DFU, and the aim of this article is to discuss the factors responsible for delayed wound healing in patients with diabetes, and the treatment strategies that are available.