Association of objectively measured physical activity with combined bilateral knee and low-back pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study

Gait analysis of patients with knee osteoarthiritis who can run versus cannot run

BACKGROUND

Many middle-aged and older adults participate in running to maintain their health and fitness; however, some have to stop running due to osteoarthritis-attributed knee pain. It was unclear whether gait biomechanics and knee physical findings differ between those who can and cannot run.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the gait and knee physical findings of patients with knee osteoarthritis who remain capable of running in comparison to those who are not capable of running?

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study, which recruited 23 patients over the age of 40 who had been diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. Their knee joint ranges of motion and muscle strength, knee pain, and the maximum gait speed (walk as fast as possible) were measured. Knee alignment was calculated from X-ray images, and the knee joint extension angle and adduction moment during a self-selected gait speed were determined using motion analysis. Participants were divided into two groups-those able to run (n=11) and those unable to run (n=12). The measured and calculated outcomes were compared between groups, and logistic regression analyses of significantly different outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

There were significant group differences in the maximum knee extension angle during stance phase (p = 0.027), maximum gait speed during the 10-m walk test (p = 0.014), knee pain during gait (p = 0.039) and medial proximal tibial angle by X-ray (p = 0.035). Logistic regression analyses revealed that the maximum knee extension angle during stance phase (OR: 1.44, 95%CI: 1.06¬1.94, p = 0.02) was a significant factor.

SIGNIFICANCE

The ability to extend the knee during gait is an important contributing factor in whether participants with knee osteoarthritis are capable of running.

Physical activity assessment with wearable devices in rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In the management of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMDs), regular physical activity (PA) is an important recognized non-pharmacological intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate how the use of wearable devices (WDs) impacts physical activity in patients with noninflammatory and inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of articles was performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. A random-effect meta-analysis was carried out on the number of steps and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Univariable meta-regression models were computed to assess the possibility that the study characteristics may act as modifiers on the final meta-analysis estimate.

RESULTS

In the analysis, 51 articles were included, with a total of 7488 participants. Twenty-two studies considered MVPA outcome alone, 16 studies considered the number of steps alone, and 13 studies reported information on both outcomes. The recommended PA threshold was reached for MVPA (36.35, 95% CI 29.39, 43.31) but not for daily steps (-1092.60, -1640.42 to -544.77). Studies on patients with fibromyalgia report a higher number (6290, 5198.65-7381.62) of daily steps compared with other RMDs. Patients affected by chronic inflammatory arthropathies seemed to fare better in terms of daily steps than the other categories. Patients of younger age reported a higher overall level of PA than elderly individuals for both the number of steps and MVPA.

CONCLUSION

Physical activity can be lower than the recommended threshold in patients with RMDs when objectively measured using WD. WDs could be a useful and affordable instrument for daily monitoring physical activity in RMDs and may support an increase in activity levels.

PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42021227681, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=227681.