Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: Update on diagnosis and therapy

Irreversible Electroporation as a Valid Treatment Option for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: An International Multicenter Experience

PURPOSE

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor with currently no established standard of care. This international multicenter retrospective study assesses the use of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablative tool to treat HEHE and provides a clinical overview of the current management and role of IRE in HEHE treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, 14 patients with 47 HEHE tumors were treated with percutaneous IRE using CT-scan guidance in 23 procedures. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Primary outcome measures included safety and effectiveness, analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and treatment response by mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcome measures included technical success, post-treatment tumor sizes and length of hospital stay. Technical success was defined as complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin (intentional tumor free ablation margin > 5 mm).

RESULTS

IRE treatment resulted in technical success in all tumors. Following a median follow-up of 15 months, 30 tumors demonstrated a complete response according to mRECIST criteria. The average tumor size pre-treatment was 25.8 mm, accompanied by an average reduction in tumor size by 7.5 mm. In 38 out of 47 tumors, there was no evidence of local recurrence. In nine tumors, residual tumor was present. There were no cases of progressive disease. Median length of hospital stay was one day. Only one grade 3 CTCAE event occurred, a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement.

CONCLUSION

The current study provides evidence that IRE is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive treatment option for HEHE.

A Young Female with a Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma

Background

Primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an extremely rare tumour of vascular origin with an incidence of <0.1 cases per 100,000 people worldwide.

Case description

A 29-year-old female with the history of epigastric pain and unintentional weight loss (3 kg over six months) was referred for upper endoscopy. The examination was without visual pathological findings, but a rapid urease test was positive. First-line treatment with clarithromycin-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection was given. After completion of eradication therapy, diffuse abdominal pain developed. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed multiple liver nodules. Three consecutive core liver biopsies were performed and were inconclusive. A subsequent surgical liver nodule resection was performed. Histopathology of the specimen revealed grade 2 hepatocellular carcinoma; bone scintigraphy was negative for metastasis. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) recommended giving the patient sorafenib, which was poorly tolerated. The histology was reviewed using immunohistochemistry staining at the request of the oncologist, which showed expression of CD31 and CD34. Based on clinical, morphological and immunohistochemistry findings, a diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma was made. Based on the multidisciplinary team's findings, liver transplantation was indicated as the only curative treatment.

Conclusion

Because of the rarity of this disease, combining clinical, radiological and histopathological methods as well as an MDT approach can help to reach the correct final diagnosis. As demonstrated in this clinical case, it is crucial to perform immunohistochemistry of a liver biopsy to confirm a HEHE diagnosis.

LEARNING POINTS

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular tumour that is often misdiagnosed and mismanaged.This case emphasises the critical importance of interdisciplinary teamwork and the use of non-invasive and invasive techniques to achieve a definitive diagnosis.

Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma in a Dog

A 5-year-old spayed female Breton dog was referred for a thyroid nodule. A total body CT scan evidenced multifocal hepatic nodules. Cytological liver samples were hemodiluted and non-diagnostic. Following a thyroidectomy, the histology was consistent with a follicular-compact thyroid carcinoma. On laparoscopy, most hepatic lobes had multifocal dark-red nodules that were biopsied for histology. Microscopically, the hepatic parenchyma in the nodules was substituted by blood channels lined by bland spindle cells but adjacent to epithelioid neoplastic cells, single or in clusters, embedded in a moderate amount of edematous collagen matrix. These cells had optically empty cytoplasmic space, occasionally containing erythrocytes (microlumina). Spindle and epithelioid cells expressed membranous-to-cytoplasmic CD31 and FVIII-RA consistent with endothelial origin. Based on morphology and immunolabelling, a hemangioendothelioma with epithelioid differentiation was diagnosed. Lesions in the liver were initially stable, showing progression with time. The dog was alive with no systemic clinical signs 36 months after laparoscopy.

A case report of parotid gland epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare low-grade malignant vascular tumor. It mainly occurs in the liver, lungs, bones, and other parts of the body. Reports of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in the parotid gland are rare in both domestic and international literature. Here, we present a case report of a parotid gland epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, including its complete clinical course and imaging findings, to improve the diagnosis and treatment of this unusual disease.

Case presentation

The patient, a 75-year-old female, presented with a swelling around the right ear for 2 months and pain for 20 days. Enhanced MRI of the parotid gland revealed a well-defined, round mass with homogeneous signal intensity. The mass showed low signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging, high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging, nodular low signal intensity within, significant high signal intensity on DWI sequence, low signal intensity on ADC sequence, and heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase after intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA. Nodular non-enhancing low signal intensity was observed internally, and slight clearance was seen in the venous phase. The initial diagnosis before surgery was a benign lesion, but after histopathological and immunohistochemical examination, it was confirmed as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Intervention

Complete tumor resection was performed.

Results

The patient experienced a favorable recovery, with meticulous follow-up conducted for up to 1 year revealing no signs of recurrence or metastasis. Continued patient surveillance is ongoing to substantiate and validate the long-term efficacy of the treatment.

Conclusion

Due to the extreme rarity of parotid gland epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, it often leads to a high misdiagnosis rate. The most common misdiagnosis is salivary gland lymphoma, followed by epithelioid hemangiosarcoma. When the lesion is multifocal, fusiform, with internal necrosis, and shows punctate low signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging, significant enhancement in the arterial phase, particularly with more pronounced peripheral enhancement, and persistent enhancement in the venous and delayed phases, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma should be considered. However, the current clinical diagnosis of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma still primarily relies on immunohistochemical methods.

Image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

PURPOSE

Disease control and survival following percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was studied retrospectively.

METHODS

Six patients underwent 16 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 35 liver tumors from 2015 to 2022 (17 microwave ablation, 9 irreversible electroporation, 8 cryoablation, and 1 radiofrequency ablation). Technical success, local progression, intrahepatic progression, distant progression, overall survival, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Four of six (67%) patients were treatment naïve prior to ablation. The mean length of imaging follow-up from first ablation procedure was 43.0 ± 31.2 months. Thirty-three of 35 (94.3%) ablated tumors did not progress locally. Three of 6 patients (50%) had new intrahepatic progression and underwent repeat ablation or systemic treatment. No extrahepatic progression was observed. One patient died from EHE 2.7 years after initial diagnosis. No severe adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous ablation is feasible, often in a staged fashion, and may provide favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with hepatic EHE.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma-a single-institution experience with 51 cases

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to describe the experience at a single institution in the management of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE).

Methods

We included 51 patients with histologically confirmed HEHE. We performed log-rank (Cox-Mantel) survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods to test differences in survival between patients in different groups. Univariate Cox regression analyses and multivariate proportional hazards regression model were carried out to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

Different imaging modalities were used to diagnose HEHE with various presentations. Liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), systemic treatment (ST), and surveillance had been used in our study. A significant difference was noted between the LR group and the surveillance group with respect to mean survival (p = 0.006), as was in the LR group and the ST group (p = 0.036), and in surgical approach (LR and LT) and nonsurgical approach (ST and surveillance) (p = 0.008). The mean survival between the ST group and the surveillance group was not significantly different (p = 0.851). LR (p = 0.010) and surgical approach (p = 0.014) were favorable predictors of outcome, while macrovascular invasion (MaVI) (p = 0.037), lung metastasis (p = 0.040), and surveillance (p = 0.033) were poor prognostic factors in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that LR (p = 0.010) and surgical approach (p = 0.014) were independently associated with good OS, while surveillance (p = 0.033) was independently associated with poor OS. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in the LR group have much better OS than those in the surveillance group (p = 0.013). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the LR group and ST group (p = 0.254), as was in the ST group and the surveillance group (p = 0.857).

Conclusions

The definitive diagnosis of HEHE was dependent on histopathology, and it was not possible to make a specific diagnosis without biopsy because the radiological findings were similar to those in some hepatic malignancies. ST was not recommended for patients who were not candidates for surgical approaches, and surgical approaches should be warranted regardless of disease stage. The retrospective nature and the small size of the data limited the generalizability of the study, designing a worldwide database that contains all data about patients with HEHE independent of their therapy, which was highly recommended.

Primary and Secondary Angiosarcomas of the Liver: A Multi-institutional Study of 32 Cases

Angiosarcomas involving the liver can be hepatic primary or metastasis from another anatomic site, which have not been systematically compared. We analyzed a series of liver biopsy or resection specimens carrying a diagnosis of angiosarcoma collected between 2005-2018 at 3 tertiary medical centers. The cohort included 32 patients (20 M, 12 F) with a median age of 64 years old. Nineteen were primary hepatic angiosarcoma (PHA) and 13 metastatic to liver (MA). Males were predominant in PHA (15/19, 78%) compared to MA (5/13, 38%, P=0.025). There was no age difference between the two groups. Five cases had background hepatic cirrhosis, which more likely harbored PHA (4/5, 80%). Multifocality and multi-organ involvement were common in both groups. Tumor size was significantly larger in PHA than MA (10.4 vs. 4.7 cm, P<0.01). Histologically, there were no differences in terms of tumor morphology (spindled vs. epithelioid) and growth patterns (vasoformative vs. solid) between the two groups. Immunohistochemically, all tumor cells were positive for CD31 (28/28, 100%) and ERG (18/18, 100%). Molecular analysis in 5 cases demonstrated different mutation profiles involving different genes including MTOR, PIK3CA, ARID1A, CDKN2A, PTEN, TP53, ATRX, KDR/VEGFR2, etc. On follow-up, 30 (93%) patients died of disease at a median survival of 114 days. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed PHA and epithelioid morphology to be associated with worse survival (P<0.05) while treatment associated with better survival (P<0.001). Our results confirmed that angiosarcoma, particularly PHA is extremely aggressive. Epithelioid morphology is an adverse prognosticator and may be used for tumor subclassification.

CT appearances and classification of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is extremely rare, and CT features have never been analyzed in a large group of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was designed to review the contrast-enhanced CT images of HEH patients. Intrahepatic lesions were categorized into three types: nodular, locally coalescent (coalescent lesion contained in one segment) or diffusely coalescent (coalescent lesion occupied more than one segment). CT features were compared among lesions of different sizes and patients with different lesion types.

RESULTS

A total of 93 HEH patients were included in this study, and 740 lesions were analyzed. The results of per-lesion analysis showed that medium lesions (2-5 cm) had the highest rate of lollipop sign (16.8%) and target-like enhancement (43.1%), while lesions in large group (> 5 cm) had the highest rate of capsular retraction (38.8%) and vascular invasion (38.8%). The differences on enhancement pattern and the rates of lollipop sign and capsular retraction were significant among lesions of different sizes (p < 0.001, respectively). The results of per-patient analysis showed that patients in locally coalescent group had the highest rates of lollipop sign (74.3%) and target sign (94.3%). All patients in diffusely coalescent group had capsular retraction and vascular invasion. CT appearances of capsular retraction, lollipop sign, target sign and vascular invasion differed significantly among patients with different lesion types (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CT features variated among HEH patients with different lesion types, and radiological appearances of HEH should be classified into nodular type, locally coalescent type and diffusely coalescent type.

Poor response to sintilimab plus chemotherapy in a pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma patient: a case report

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (PEH) is a rare vascular tumor with no established treatment protocol. The authors report the case of a young woman diagnosed with PEH. DNA and RNA analysis by next-generation sequencing was performed on the tumor tissue. A novel germline PALB2 mutation and classical WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion were identified. She experienced a poor response to sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. PEH patients harboring a germline PALB2 mutation and WWTR1-CAMTA1 gene fusion may respond poorly to treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.

A review of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma-Analyzing patient characteristics and treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare vascular tumor of unknown etiology and unpredictable natural history. To date, no large-scale studies have been published evaluating this disease due to its rare occurrence.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was reviewed between 2004 and 2016 to identify patients with HEH. Univariate analysis with overall survival (OS) was performed by Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier method was used to create OS curves and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

We identified 229 patients with HEH. The majority of patients were female (61.1%), white (84.3%), and had a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (75%). Chemotherapeutic intervention was seen in 26% of the patients while 33% received surgical intervention in the form of wedge/segmental liver resection (n = 27), hepatectomy lobectomy/extended lobectomy (n = 18), and liver transplant (n = 22). Five-year survival in surgical patients was 90.5%, 66.5% and 81%, respectively (p = 0.485). Age greater than 55 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; p < 0.001), Asian ethnicity compared to white (HR, 2.84; p = 0.012), and a higher Charlson-Deyo score (score 1: HR, 2.28; p < 0.001 and score ≥2: HR, 2.76; p = 0.011) were associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for HEH remains variable with only a third of the patients undergoing surgery. International collaboration is necessary to determine the optimal treatment for this rare disease.

Interventional Management of Portal Hypertension in Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of the classifications and clinical hallmarks of common cancer-related conditions that contribute to the high incidence of portal hypertension in this population and provide an update on currently available interventional radiology therapeutic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last few decades, there have been significant advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of portal hypertension. This knowledge has led to the development of safer and more effective minimally invasive approaches. The main objective is to provide alternatives to prevent life-threatening complications from clinically significant portal hypertension and to allow the continuation of cancer treatment interventions that would otherwise be stopped. Clinicians involved in cancer care should be aware of risk factors, associated complications, and management of portal hypertension in cancer patients. Interventional radiology offers minimally invasive alternatives that play a central role in improving clinical outcomes and survival of these patients, allowing the continuation of cancer treatments.

Updated information regarding management of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare hepatic vascular tumor with a borderline biological behavior between hemangioma and hemangiosarcoma. It tends to be multiple or diffuse subcapsular lesions across the liver but has no characteristic clinical manifestations or imaging findings. On computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, these lesions usually have a hypodense appearance with heterogeneous enhancement and a "halo sign" or "lollipop sign" may be evident in some cases. HEHE is diagnosed mainly based on a pathological examination along with differential immunohistochemical markers such as CAMTA1, CD31, CD34, CD10, vimentin, and factor VIII antigen. Currently, there are no standardized treatment guidelines for HEHE, and surgery (curative resection and liver transplantation) remains the mainstay of treatment. Studies have indicated that extra-hepatic metastasis might not be a contraindication for resection or transplantation. Systemic chemotherapeutic agents including doxorubicin, vincristine, interferon-a, 5-fluorouracil, and thalidomide, as well as VEGF-related agents are being investigated, but no agents have been approved for the treatment of HEHE.

Three cases of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Case reports

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a very rare vascular endothelial cell tumor, which lacks typical clinical manifestations and specificity of imaging features. Whether the background of fatty liver and the difference in Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics between large and small lesions has not been well defined. In this case reports, we described the ultrasound image features of three patients with HEHE. These three patients with HEHE have certain similar characteristics of conventional ultrasound and CEUS. CEUS imaging features include large nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with rim-enhancement, nonenhancing regions in the center, while small nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with hyperenhancement. All nodules show faster washout than hepatic parenchyma, showing heterogeneous hypoenhancement, and more washout lesions can be found in the PVP and LP. Conventional ultrasound and CEUS not only help to improve the diagnostic confidence of HEHE of rare liver tumors, but also can guide the biopsy area, making it easier to make accurate pathological diagnosis.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma after thirteen years’ follow-up: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular endothelial cell tumor of the liver, consisting of epithelioid and histiocyte-like vascular endothelial cells in mucus or a fibrotic matrix. Immunohistochemistry is usually positive for vascular markers, such as factor VIII-related antigen, CD31, and CD34. Hepatic EHE can have a varied clinical course; treatment includes liver transplantation, liver resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 46-year-old woman with abdominal discomfort and elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen was found to have multiple low-density lesions in the liver and lung on computed tomography (CT) evaluation. An ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy revealed a fibrous stroma with dendritic cells, containing intracellular vacuoles. Immunohistochemical staining found that the tumor cells were positive for CD34, CD31, and factor VIII-related antigen. The patient received four courses of combined chemotherapy and was followed-up for 13 years, at which time the patient was in stable condition without disease progression and a confined neoplasm, as evidenced by CT scans.

CONCLUSION

The histology and immunohistochemical characteristics of hepatic EHE are well described. Chemotherapy may be effective in patients with extrahepatic lesions.

Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma With Unique Metastasis to the Superior Vena Cava Found on CT Imaging: A Case Study

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare malignant tumor of vascular origin. Classically, HEHE is typically associated with imaging demonstrating multifocal heterogeneously enhancing hepatic nodules and histologic examination revealing mixed epithelioid and dendritic cells in a proliferative fibrous stromal background. While generally described as a low-to-intermediate grade indolent tumor, it is essential to establish the presence or absence of extrahepatic spread when considering transplant candidacy. We describe one case study in which a transplant was denied to a unique metastatic pattern of HEHE to the superior vena cava. This is a previously unreported location of metastasis of HEHE and may serve to broaden our current understanding of potential metastatic sites for this disease.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare hepatic vascular tumor with unpredictable malignant potential. The etiology, characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of HEHE are not well-understood, and large-scale retrospective studies are required to understand better this disease.

AIM

To determine the characteristics of HEHE and identify its optimal treatments and prognostic factors.

METHODS

The clinical data of two patients diagnosed with HEHE at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and 258 previously reported cases retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and PubMed databases between 1996 and 2021 were combined and summarized. All cases were pathologically identified as HEHE. Information such as clinical features, laboratory examination findings, imaging findings, pathological characteristics, treatment, and survival periods was reviewed. Kaplan-Meir curves were used for survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

HEHE primarily affected middle-aged women. The typical manifestations included epigastric pain, hepatosplenomegaly, inappetence, distension, weight loss, and fatigue. Tumor markers were expressed normally. The incidence of extrahepatic metastasis was 34.5% at the time of diagnosis. The most common sites of extrahepatic involvement were the lungs (22.3%), lymph nodes (5.6%), peritoneum (3.6%), bones (6.6%), and spleen (5.1%). Furthermore, “capsular retraction”, “target sign”, and “lollipop sign” were the characteristic features of HEHE on imaging. The immunohistochemical profile for HEHE (expression of vascular markers, such as factor VIII-related antigen, CD31, and CD34; expression levels of D2-40) can facilitate and ensure an accurate diagnosis. The management options for patients with HEHE include liver resection (29.7%), liver transplantation (16.1%), palliative treatments (12.7%), transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization (TACE, 10.2%), chemotherapy (11.0%), antiangiogenic therapy (15.3%), and other treatments (5.1%); the mean survival time was 158.6, 147.3, 4.2, 90.8, 71.4, 83.1, and 55.0 mo, respectively. The survival time of patients who underwent surgical treatment was longer than that of patients who did not. TACE and antiangiogenic therapy tended to prolong survival compared with other nonsurgical treatments. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 82%, 71%, and 64%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that liver function (P = 0.045), intrahepatic metastasis (P = 0.029), and treatment (P = 0.045) were independent prognostic factors. The presence of extrahepatic metastases was not an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (P = 0.558).

CONCLUSION

The clinical course of HEHE is rare and variable, and patients with intrahepatic metastases and liver dysfunction may have a poorer prognosis than those without. Surgical intervention, whether liver resection or transplantation, might be warranted regardless of extrahepatic metastasis. For patients without the option for surgery, clinicians should consider the use of TACE with antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of HEHE.

Primary Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Masquerading as a Hepatic Abscess With Infective Picture: A Case Report

Hepatic endotheiloid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) commonly presents with multilobar involvement with locally aggressive behavior. In most cases, it presents with right upper quadrant abdominal pain, hepatomegaly, and weight loss with metastasis commonly to the lung. We present a 33-year-old woman with hepatic EHE with an initial presentation mimicking hepatic abscess and imaging findings misleading for metastatic liver lesions. It was confirmed on pathology with immunohistochemistry, but the patient could not survive due to her late presentation and the presence of metastatic lesions in the lung.

Clinical characteristics and CT features of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma and comparison with those of liver metastases

BACKGROUND

To analyse clinical characteristics and computer tomography (CT) findings of hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (HEH) and to determine differential features compared with liver metastasis (LM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients with histopathologically confirmed HEH (n = 20) and LM (n = 60) of different primary tumours who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans. CT findings included the location, contour, size, number, margin, and density of lesions, the patterns and degree of contrast enhancement of lesions, vascular invasion and changes in other organs. The enhancement ratio (ER) and tumour-to-normal parenchyma ratio (TNR) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to determine areas under the curve (AUCs).

RESULTS

About 65% of HEH lesions were located in submarginal areas. Significant differences were observed between HEH and LM patients in age, sex, and tumour marker positivity (p < 0.05). HEH showed minimal to slight enhancement, thin ring-like enhancement in arterial phase, and slight, homogeneous, progressive enhancement in the portal phase. HEH presented capsule retraction, and the "target" sign and the "lollipop" sign were significantly more frequent than in LM (p < 0.05). The ER and TNR in the arterial phase of HEH were lower than those of LM (p < 0.05). AUCs of ER and TNR in the arterial phase were 0.74 and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lesions in subcapsular locations, capsular retraction, slight and thin ring-like enhancement, "target" and "lollipop" signs and lower ER and TNR in the arterial phase may represent important features of HEH compared with LM.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma simulating liver metastasis: A case report

Introduction

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor of vascular origin. Liver involvement is often multinodular simulating metastases. Herein, we report a rare case of HEHE mimicking liver metastases in a female patient.

Case presentation

A 43-years-old female patient, presented with complaints of pain in the right upper quadrant. Laboratory tests were all within the normal range. Abdominal ultrasound revealed multiple heterogeneous hypoechoic liver lesions. A thoracic and abdominopelvic computed tomography showed bilateral pulmonary micronodules with multiple hypodense hepatic nodules involving both lobes. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy with pathological study and immunohistochemistry staining revealed the diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Discussion

HEHE usually involves both liver lobes with three radiological presentations: single nodular, multiple nodular, or diffuse types, the diffuse type reflects an advanced stage. 3/4 of the cases are initially misdiagnosed as liver metastases or primary liver tumors. The pathological study with the immunochemistry stainings confirms the diagnosis. There is no standard treatment for HEHE due to its rarity and lack of prospective randomized studies.

Conclusion

HEHE is a rare tumor of vascular origin of unknown etiology with malignant potential and unpredictable course. The therapeutic management of this rare condition is not codified and is discussed on a case-by-case basis. Surgical treatment remains the best option with an excellent outcome.

•

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare tumor of vascular origin.

•

The Clinical presentation and the radiological findings are not specific.

•

Final Diagnosis is made upon pathological study and immunohistochemistry staining.

•

Surgical treatment remain the treatment of choice.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an ultra-rare cancer: a consensus paper from the community of experts

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, translocated, vascular sarcoma. EHE clinical behavior is variable, ranging from that of a low-grade malignancy to that of a high-grade sarcoma and it is marked by a high propensity for systemic involvement. No active systemic agents are currently approved specifically for EHE, which is typically refractory to the antitumor drugs used in sarcomas. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy for EHE patients and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of the disease make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many EHE patients. To address the shortcoming, a global consensus meeting was organized in December 2020 under the umbrella of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) involving >80 experts from several disciplines from Europe, North America and Asia, together with a patient representative from the EHE Group, a global, disease-specific patient advocacy group, and Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN). The meeting was aimed at defining, by consensus, evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to primary and metastatic EHE. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication.

•

This consensus paper provides key recommendations on the management of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE).

•

Recommendations followed a consensus meeting between experts and a representative of the EHE advocacy group and SPAEN.

•

Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions from Europe, North America and Asia.