Requisites, benefits, and challenges of sustainable HIV/AIDS system-building: where theory meets practice

Responsibility in Medical Sociology: A Second, Reflexive Look

Personal responsibility has emerged as an important element in many countries' public health planning, and has attracted substantial debate in public health discourse. Contemporary medical sociology typically resists such "responsibilization" as victim-blaming, by privileged elites, that obscures important structural factors and inequities. This paper, based primarily on a broad review of how contemporary Anglophone medical sociology literatures treat responsibility and blame, points out advantages of taking responsibility seriously, particularly from the individual's perspective. These advantages include: empowerment; responsibility-as-coping-mechanism; moral dignity; and the pragmatic logic of doing for oneself, rather than passively awaiting societal reforms. We also offer possible reasons why sociologists and their subjects view these issues so differently, and suggest some areas for future research.

Co-location of health care services for homeless veterans: a case study of innovation in program implementation

This case study examines how the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (GLA) improved homeless veteran service utilization through program innovation that addressed service fragmentation. The new program offered same-day co-located mental health, medical, and homeless services with a coordinated intake system. The program is analyzed using a framework proposed by Rosenheck (2001) that has four phases: the decision to implement, initial implementation, sustained maintenance, and termination or transformation. GLA was able to successfully implement a new program that remains in the sustained maintenance phase five years after the initial decision to implement. Key factors from the Rosenheck innovation model in the program's success included coalition building, linking the project to legitimate goals, program monitoring, and developing communities of practicing clinicians. The key lesson from the case study is the need for a coalition to persistently problem solve and act as advocates for the program, even after successful initial implementation. Social work leadership was critical in all phases of program implementation.

Wiring the HIV/AIDS system: building interorganizational infrastructure to link people, sites, and networks

This paper presents a case example of the new "geometry of care" (Rier and Indyk, this volume), by examining selected examples from five facets of a program developed by the lead author and in operation since 1989. This program is designed to understand, build, revise, and maintain the organizational infrastructure with which to link diverse players and sites, and combine these into a web for producing, assessing, and exchanging the information needed to combat HIV/AIDS. Each example demonstrates how opportunities were exploited for developing and linking resources within and between systems of care and prevention. The program began as an iterative and systems approach to improve access of high-risk, hard-to-reach inner city New York populations to HIV/AIDS services, treatment, and research. The approach is also currently being further elaborated and applied in Argentina and India (see Boylan et al., this volume), and is adaptable to other local and global public health challenges (see Indyk & Rier, this volume).

Flexible rigidity: supporting HIV treatment adherence in a rapidly-changing treatment environment

This paper examines adherence to AIDS treatment, focusing on the challenges posed by rapidly changing treatment protocols. We examine the evolving views of treatment adherence, and endorse the "concordance" approach. This emphasizes collaboration and negotiation between provider and patient to formulate and maintain a manageable treatment regimen tailored to what the patient is ready, willing, and able to tolerate. Given the extreme rapidity with which treatment guidelines are revised or even reversed, the persistent uncertainty surrounding treatment risks and benefits, and the great variability in individuals' ability to tolerate a given regimen, we propose the term "flexible rigidity" to describe the type of adherence best suited to AIDS treatment. We present an organizational approach to supporting the type of provider-patient relationships needed to improve treatment adherence that features treatment- readiness assessment and custom-tailoring of treatment for those at all stages of the treatment-readiness continuum. We note that this model could be applied as well to prevention and management of other chronic diseases.