The Use of Tramadol for Acute Heroin Withdrawal

IUPHAR review - Data-driven computational drug repurposing approaches for opioid use disorder

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a chronic and relapsing condition characterized by the misuse of opioid drugs, causing significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Existing medications for OUD are limited, and there is an immediate need to discover treatments with enhanced safety and efficacy. Drug repurposing aims to find new indications for existing medications, offering a time-saving and cost-efficient alternative strategy to traditional drug discovery. Computational approaches have been developed to further facilitate the drug repurposing process. In this paper, we reviewed state-of-the-art data-driven computational drug repurposing approaches for OUD and discussed their advantages and potential challenges. We also highlighted promising repurposed candidate drugs for OUD that were identified by computational drug repurposing techniques and reviewed studies supporting their potential mechanisms of action in treating OUD.

The effects of cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitors on a high-dose tramadol taper for medically supervised opioid withdrawal: a retrospective chart review

Background: Tramadol is used off-label for medically supervised opioid withdrawal. Tramadol is metabolized by CYP2D6 to an active metabolite with significantly more pharmacologic activity compared to the parent compound.Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of CYP2D6 inhibitors on patient response to a tramadol taper for medically supervised opioid withdrawal.Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who received a tramadol taper for medically supervised opioid withdrawal was conducted comparing patients who received concomitant moderate-to-strong CYP2D6 inhibitors to patients without concomitant therapy. The primary outcome was the change in Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) scores from baseline to discharge. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve of CINA scores over time, additional CINA outcomes, length of stay, and readmissions.Results: Of 100 charts reviewed, 30 patients received a concomitant moderate-to-strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline demographics of the two groups. Change from baseline CINA to discharge did not differ significantly between the Non-2D6 group and the 2D6 group (-4.0 ± 3.83 and -4.5 ± 4.48 respectively; p = 0.606). The average CINA score for nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the Non-2D6 group compared to the 2D6 group (0.34 ± 0.35 and 0.18 ± 0.33 respectively; p = 0.019). Otherwise there were no significant differences found in any secondary outcomes.Conclusions: Based on these results, moderate-to-strong CYP2D6 inhibitors do not appear to have a significant impact on the withdrawal course for patients treated with a high-dose tramadol taper.

Tramadol for the Management of Opioid Withdrawal: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

The increase in the prescription of opioid medications has resulted in a wildfire of misuse of opioids, both for medical and non-medical reasons, with over 1.7 million people in the United States (US) suffering from distinct disorders owing to opioid use. While various medications, such as methadone, buprenorphine, and naloxone, among others, have been used in treating opioid withdrawal symptoms, concerns of the potential abuse of these drugs, the cost of procurement, legislations, and prescription policies have risen. In recent times, tramadol has been considered a viable replacement for some of these treatment regimes. Tramadol is a synthetic analgesic that acts centrally, possessing opioid-like effects due to the binding of its metabolite with the mu (µ)-opioid receptor, yet with low potential for abuse. Several clinical studies conducted in the past ten years have identified the effects of tramadol in opioid withdrawal cases. The results showed that it exhibits better efficacy and tolerance with fewer side effects in specific clinical scenarios as compared to existing available detox management. We aim to examine the properties of tramadol in opioid withdrawal through this systematic review of clinical studies on humans.

Clinical Trials for Opioid Use Disorder

This chapter describes recent clinical trials for opioid use disorder (OUD), an area that has rapidly accelerated in response to the opioid overdose crisis in the USA and newly appropriated funding. Trials involve a wide range of compounds including cannabinoids and psychedelics, new and existing compounds targeting domains emerging from addiction neuroscience, agents repurposed from other indications, and novel strategies including vaccines, enzymes, and other biologicals. In parallel, new formulations of existing compounds offer immediate promise, as do a variety of web-based interventions and smartphone-delivered apps. Trials focused on implementing existing effective interventions in mainstream healthcare settings, and others focused on special populations, e.g., adolescents, criminal justice, pregnant women, native Americans, etc., have the potential to vastly expand treatment in the near term. Given the range of ongoing and recent trials, this chapter is not intended to be an exhaustive review but rather to present an overview of approaches within the framework of the opioid treatment cascade and the context of current OUD pharmacotherapies.

A retrospective chart review of outcomes resulting from a three-day tramadol taper for acute opioid withdrawal

The purpose of the study was to describe patient outcomes with a 3-day tramadol taper for acute opioid withdrawal on the detoxification unit at Summa Health System. The primary endpoint was the change in Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) score from the start of the taper until completion or discharge. Secondary endpoints were length of stay, use of adjuvant medications, taper completion rates, highest CINA score, adverse events, and 30-day readmission rates. A retrospective, quality improvement, cohort study was performed describing outcomes of opioid dependent patients in acute withdrawal admitted on the detoxification unit between September 2014 and September 2016 receiving the 3-day tramadol taper. All patients ≥18 years of age admitted for opioid dependence were included. Pregnant patients were excluded. Forty-five patients were included in the analysis. Patient ages ranged from 18-67 and 25 (55.6%) were male. The full taper was completed in 67.7% of admissions and 75.8% of patients were discharged by the physician. There was a statistically significant change of the pre-taper score compared to the score at completion or discharge in the per protocol group (-1.58, p = 0.010). There were no reported seizures or falls. The 3-day tramadol taper proved to be safe and effective therapy for treating acute opioid withdrawal. In the Summa Health System detoxification unit, patients treated with a 3-day tramadol taper for acute opioid withdrawal had their pre-taper CINA scores reduced by over 25% at the completion of the taper or discharge.

Use of Tramadol for Management of Opioid Use Disorders: Rationale and Recommendations

Opioids are one of the most common illicit psychoactive substances being used in India. In fact, opioid use disorders are the most common disorder presenting to the substance use disorder treatment centers across the country. Effective and evidence-based interventions are available for management of opioid use disorders. However, the treatment for opioid use disorders remains difficult to access for most of those in need in India. The current article presents the literature on the use of tramadol for the management of opioid use disorders. It also makes recommendations on the use of tramadol for the management of opioid use disorders. Tramadol offers a viable alternative to the existing options for the management of opioid use disorders. It has been found effective when used for this indication. It offers certain major advantages such as easy and wide availability and low abuse liability. It offers a good option to expand the treatment services for opioid use disorders across the country.

Efficacy of Tramadol Extended-Release for Opioid Withdrawal: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health problem. Supervised withdrawal (ie, detoxification) from opioids using clonidine or buprenorphine hydrochloride is a widely used treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether tramadol hydrochloride extended-release (ER), an approved analgesic with opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of action and low abuse potential, is effective for use in supervised withdrawal settings.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in a residential research setting with 103 participants with OUD. Participants' treatment was stabilized with morphine, 30 mg, administered subcutaneously 4 times daily. A 7-day taper using clonidine (n = 36), tramadol ER (n = 36), or buprenorphine (n = 31) was then instituted, and patients were crossed-over to double-blind placebo during a post-taper period. The study was conducted from October 25, 2010, to June 23, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Retention, withdrawal symptom management, concomitant medication utilization, and naltrexone induction. Results were analyzed over time and using area under the curve for the intention-to-treat and completer groups.

RESULTS

Of the 103 participants, 88 (85.4%) were men and 43 (41.7%) were white; mean (SD) age was 28.9 (10.4) years. Buprenorphine participants (28 [90.3%]) were significantly more likely to be retained at the end of the taper compared with clonidine participants (22 [61.1%]); tramadol ER retention was intermediate and did not differ significantly from that of the other groups (26 [72.2%]; χ2 = 8.5, P = .01). Time-course analyses of withdrawal revealed significant effects of phase (taper, post taper) for the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score (taper mean, 5.19 [SE, .26]; post-taper mean, 3.97 [SE, .23]; F2,170 = 3.6, P = .03) and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) score (taper mean,8.81 [SE, .40]; post-taper mean, 4.14 [SE, .30]; F2,170 = 15.7, P < .001), but no group effects or group × phase interactions. Analyses of area under the curve of SOWS total scores showed significant reductions (F2,159 = 17.7, P < .001) in withdrawal severity between the taper and post-taper periods for clonidine (taper mean, 13.1; post-taper mean, 3.2; P < .001) and tramadol ER (taper mean, 7.4; post-taper mean, 2.8; P = .03), but not buprenorphine (taper mean, 6.4; post-taper mean, 7.4). Use of concomitant medication increased significantly (F2,159 = 30.7,  P < .001) from stabilization to taper in the clonidine (stabilization mean, 0.64 [SE, .05]; taper mean, 1.54 [SE, .10]; P < .001) and tramadol ER (stabilization mean, 0.53 [SE, .05]; taper mean, 1.19 [SE, .09]; P = .003) groups and from stabilization to post taper in the buprenorphine group (stabilization mean, 0.46 [SE, .05] post-taper mean, 1.17 [SE, .09]; P = .006), suggesting higher withdrawal for those groups during those periods. Naltrexone initiation was voluntary and the percentage of participants choosing naltrexone therapy within the clonidine (8 [22.2%]), tramadol ER (7 [19.4%]), or buprenorphine (3 [9.7%]) groups did not differ significantly (χ2 = 2.5, P = .29).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this trial suggest that tramadol ER is more effective than clonidine and comparable to buprenorphine in reducing opioid withdrawal symptoms during a residential tapering program. Data support further examination of tramadol ER as a method to manage opioid withdrawal symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01188421.

Proconvulsant effects of tramadol and morphine on pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in adult rats using different routes of administration

Tramadol is frequently used as a pain reliever. However, it has been sometimes noted to have the potential to cause seizures. Because of its dual mechanism of action (both opioid and nonopioid), the adverse effect profile of tramadol can be different in comparison with single-mechanism opioid analgesics, such as morphine. In the present study, the facilitatory effects of tramadol and morphine on pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures using different routes of administration were compared in rats. Adult female rats were divided into six groups and continuously received saline, morphine, or tramadol on a daily basis for 15 days [gavage (PO) or intraperitoneal (IP)]. An increasing dose of morphine and tramadol was used to prevent resistance to repetitive dose (20-125 mg/kg). Following one week of withdrawal period and 30 min before the seizure induction (PTZ=80 mg/kg, IP), each group of rats was further divided into subgroups that received saline, morphine, or tramadol for the second time on the 22nd day of the experiment. Results showed that, while morphine, tramadol, and their administration had different effects on seizure behaviors, both acute and chronic administrations of morphine and tramadol potentiated PTZ-induced seizures. However, there was no significant difference between morphine and tramadol in terms of seizure severity. Effects of morphine and tramadol on PTZ-induced seizures were also stable following one week of withdrawal. In conclusion, this study indicated similar severity in the proconvulsant effect of morphine and tramadol on PTZ-induced seizures, which might depend on their similar effects on GABAergic pathways.

Programmable transdermal clonidine delivery through voltage-gated carbon nanotube membranes

Oral dosage forms and traditional transdermal patches are inadequate for complex clonidine therapy dosing schemes, because of the variable dose/flux requirement for the treatment of opioid withdrawal symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro transdermal flux changes of clonidine in response to alterations in carbon nanotube (CNT) delivery rates by applying various electrical bias. Additional skin diffusion studies were carried out to demonstrate the therapeutic feasibility of the system. This study demonstrated that application of a small electrical bias (-600 mV) to the CNT membrane on the skin resulted in a 4.7-fold increase in clonidine flux as compared with no bias (0 mV) application. The high and low clonidine flux values were very close to the desired variable flux of clonidine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal symptoms. Therapeutic feasibility studies demonstrated that CNT membrane served as the rate-limiting step to clonidine diffusion and lag and transition times were suitable for the clonidine therapy. Skin elimination studies revealed that clonidine depletion from the skin would not negatively affect clonidine therapy. Overall, this study showed that clonidine administration difficulties associated with the treatment of opiate withdrawal symptoms can be reduced with the programmable CNT membrane transdermal system.

Efficacy of extended-release tramadol for treatment of prescription opioid withdrawal: a two-phase randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is an atypical analgesic with monoamine and modest mu opioid agonist activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) the efficacy of extended-release (ER) tramadol in treating prescription opioid withdrawal and (2) whether cessation of ER tramadol produces opioid withdrawal.

METHODS

Prescription opioid users with current opioid dependence and observed withdrawal participated in this inpatient, two-phase double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. In Phase 1 (days 1-7), participants were randomly assigned to matched oral placebo or ER tramadol (200 or 600 mg daily). In Phase 2 (days 8-13), all participants underwent double blind crossover to placebo. Breakthrough withdrawal medications were available for all subjects. Enrollment continued until 12 completers/group was achieved.

RESULTS

Use of breakthrough withdrawal medication differed significantly (p<0.05) among groups in both phases; the 200mg group received the least amount in Phase 1, and the 600 mg group received the most in both phases. In Phase 1, tramadol 200mg produced significantly lower peak ratings than placebo on ratings of insomnia, lacrimation, muscular tension, and sneezing. Only tramadol 600 mg produced miosis in Phase 1. In Phase 2, tramadol 600 mg produced higher peak ratings of rhinorrhea, irritable, depressed, heavy/sluggish, and hot/cold flashes than placebo. There were no serious adverse events and no signal of abuse liability for tramadol.

CONCLUSIONS

ER tramadol 200mg modestly attenuated opioid withdrawal. Mild opioid withdrawal occurred after cessation of treatment with 600 mg tramadol. These data support the continued investigation of tramadol as a treatment for opioid withdrawal.

Tramadol versus methadone for treatment of opiate withdrawal: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tramadol versus methadone for treatment of opiate withdrawal. Seventy patients randomly were assigned in two groups to receive either prescribed methadone (60 mg/day) or tramadol (600 mg/day). The withdrawal syndrome of patients was evaluated before and after rapid opiate detoxification using the Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (OOWS). No significant differences existed in overall OOWS scores between two groups (P = 0.11). Dropout rates were similar in both groups. Side effects in the tramadol group were as or less common than in the methadone group, with the exception of perspiration. Tramadol may be as effective as methadone in the control of withdrawal and could be considered as a potential substitute for methadone to manage opioids withdrawal.

Effects of repeated tramadol and morphine administration on psychomotor and cognitive performance in opioid-dependent volunteers

Tramadol is an atypical, mixed mechanism analgesic used to treat moderate to severe pain. Based on evidence that tramadol has relatively low abuse potential and can relieve opioid withdrawal, tramadol may be useful for treating opioid dependence. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance side-effect profile of tramadol. Nine opioid-dependent volunteers completed a performance battery following 5-7 days of subcutaneous morphine (15 mg, 4 times/day) and two doses of oral tramadol (50, 200 mg, 4 times/day) in a within subject cross-over design. Morphine was always the first condition, and the order of the two tramadol doses was randomized and double blind. Performance was significantly worse in the morphine condition relative to one or both tramadol doses on measures of psychomotor speed/coordination (circular lights task), psychomotor speed/pattern recognition (DSST speed measure) and psychomotor speed/set shifting (trail-making tasks). There were no significant differences among conditions in DSST accuracy, simple reaction time, divided attention, working memory, episodic memory, metamemory, or time estimation. Neither tramadol dose was associated with worse performance than morphine on any measure. Although practice sessions were conducted prior to the first session to reduce order effects, the possibility that residual practice effects contributed to the differences between tramadol and morphine cannot be ruled out. The high tramadol dose produced worse performance than the low dose only on the balance measure. These findings suggest that tramadol is generally a safe medication with respect to cognitive and psychomotor measures and support tramadol's further evaluation as an opioid-dependence treatment.

Physical dependence potential of daily tramadol dosing in humans

RATIONALE

Tramadol is an atypical, mixed-mechanism analgesic involving both opioid and catecholamine processes that appears to have low abuse potential and may be useful as a treatment for opioid dependence.

OBJECTIVES

The current study assessed the level of physical dependence and opioid blockade efficacy produced by daily maintenance on oral tramadol.

METHODS

Nine residential opioid-dependent adults were maintained on two doses of daily oral tramadol (200 and 800 mg) for approximately 4-week intervals in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. The acute effects of intramuscular placebo, naloxone (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg), and hydromorphone (1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg) were tested under double-blind, randomized conditions. Outcomes included observer- and subject-rated measures and physiologic indices.

RESULTS

Challenge doses of naloxone resulted in significantly higher mean peak withdrawal scores compared to placebo. Withdrawal intensity from naloxone was generally greater during 800 versus 200 mg/day tramadol maintenance. Mean peak ratings of agonist effects were elevated at higher hydromorphone challenge doses, but did not differ significantly between tramadol doses. Physiologic measures were generally affected by challenge conditions in a dose-dependent manner, with few differences between tramadol maintenance dose conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic tramadol administration produces dose-related opioid physical dependence, without producing dose-related attenuation of agonist challenge effects. Tramadol may be a useful treatment for patients with low levels of opioid dependence or as a treatment for withdrawal during opioid detoxification, but does not appear to be effective as a maintenance medication due to a lack of opioid cross-tolerance.

Modest opioid withdrawal suppression efficacy of oral tramadol in humans

RATIONALE

Tramadol is in an unscheduled atypical analgesic with low rates of diversion and abuse and mixed pharmacologic actions, including modest opioid agonist activity.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study was to characterize the opioid withdrawal suppression efficacy of oral tramadol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Residential, opioid-dependent adults (n = 10) were maintained on morphine (15 mg subcutaneously, quad in diem) for approximately 6 weeks. Spontaneous opioid withdrawal was produced by substituting placebo for scheduled morphine doses 17.5 h before experimental sessions that occurred twice weekly. The acute effects of placebo, tramadol (50, 100, 200, and 400 mg orally), naloxone (0.1 and 0.2 mg intramuscularly [IM]), and morphine (15 and 30 mg IM) were tested under double-blind, double-dummy, randomized conditions. Outcomes included observer- and subject-rated measures, physiologic indices, and psychomotor/cognitive task performance.

RESULTS

Naloxone and morphine produced prototypic opioid antagonist and agonist effects, respectively. Tramadol 50 and 100 mg produced effects most similar to placebo. Tramadol 200 and 400 mg initially produced significant dose-related increases in ratings of "bad effects" and "feel sick," followed by evidence of opioid withdrawal suppression. Tramadol did not produce significant increases on measures of positive drug effects nor any clinically significant physiologic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol 200 and 400 mg show evidence of opioid withdrawal suppression without significant observer- and subject-rated opioid agonist effects. The profile of action did not suggest a high risk for tramadol abuse in opioid dependent individuals. Tramadol may be a useful medication for treating opioid withdrawal.

Assessment of agonist and antagonist effects of tramadol in opioid-dependent humans

The subjective, behavioral, and physiologic effects of racemic tramadol, an analgesic with low abuse liability and dual mu-opioid agonist and monoamine reuptake actions, were evaluated in 2 clinical pharmacology studies in dependent opioid abusers. In the withdrawal precipitation study, participants (N = 8) were maintained on methadone 60 mg/day orally and challenged with intramuscular tramadol, hydromorphone, naloxone, and placebo 20 hr after methadone administration. In the withdrawal suppression study, participants (N = 6) were maintained on hydromorphone given orally 10 mg 4 times daily, and spontaneous opioid withdrawal was produced by withholding doses for 23 hr. During the experimentally induced withdrawal, oral tramadol, hydromorphone, naltrexone, and placebo were given. In both studies a comprehensive panel of participant-rated, observer-rated, and physiologic measures were collected. In both studies, naloxone and naltrexone significantly increased measures of opioid withdrawal, whereas tramadol showed no discernible antagonist effects. In contrast, tramadol's pattern of effects was more similar to that of hydromorphone and suggestive of mild opioid-agonist effects (withdrawal suppression), though not to a statistically significant degree.

Inpatient Initiation of Buprenorphine Maintenance vs. Detoxification: Can Retention of Opioid-Dependent Patients in Outpatient Counseling Be Improved?

Buprenorphine-naloxone is an office-based opioid agonist released in 2003 in the United States for the maintenance of heroin- and other opioid-dependent patients. Concern has been raised that the medication will distract or otherwise inhibit patients from participating in a holistic recovery program or abstinence-based counseling. Using a retrospective chart review, the first thirty opioid-dependent patients induced on buprenorphine maintenance therapy in an inpatient detoxification unit were compared to thirty age- and gender-matched patients who underwent detoxification (with a tramadol taper) and referral to intensive outpatient treatment. The clinical outcomes were a comparison of completion rates for an intensive outpatient program (IOP) and retention in treatment after twelve weeks of aftercare therapy. Patients induced on buprenorphine maintenance over three days had similar relief of withdrawal symptoms to patients detoxified from opioids over five days with tramadol. Patients maintained on buprenorphine had a markedly increased initiation of IOP and remained in outpatient treatment longer than patients who were detoxified (8.5 wks vs. 0.4 wks, p < 0.001). This study indicates that induction and maintenance on buprenorphine may be more effective than detoxification for engaging and retaining patients in abstinence-based comprehensive outpatient addiction treatment.