Prevalence and characteristics of referred pain in patients diagnosed with temporomandibular disorders according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

BACKGROUND

Referred pain often complicates and delays the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Elaborating the prevalence and characteristics of TMD-associated referred pain as well as the distribution of referred pain in different TMD classes will significantly improve the diagnostic process. The objectives of the present study were to assess the prevalence and to evaluate the characteristics of referred pain associated with TMD diagnosed according to the DC/TMD.

METHODS

A total of 252 patients were evaluated using the DC/TMD Axes-I and -II assessment tools. Different modalities were used to treat the diagnosed TMD. Referred pain was diagnosed when the location of the perceived pain in response to palpation extended beyond the boundary of the structure that was examined. For pain locations that were perceived as deep, patients were asked to locate the surface of the area of pain. The result of the assessment was identified as positive if the patient described his perceived pain during the clinical examination as being familiar pain that was experienced in the same location in the last 30 days.  Results: TMD-associated referred pain was recorded in 153 patients (60.7%). The most common referred pain location was the temporal area (45.2%), followed by the ear (42.1%). The referred pain was recorded in disc displacement with reduction with intermittent locking and myofascial pain with referral in all patients (100%). The proportion of patients with referred pain was significantly different between the different TMD diagnostic subgroups (P < 0.001).  The recorded percentage of improvement in the referred pain following the treatment was 50.41% after 3 months and 56.65% after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Referred pain is a prominent feature of TMD. The prevalence of referred pain associated with TMD was 60.7%.  A strong strength association between the different diagnostic subgroups and the presence of referred pain existed.

Dry needling - peripheral and central considerations

Dry needling is a common treatment technique in orthopedic manual physical therapy. Although various dry needling approaches exist, the more common and best supported approach targets myofascial trigger points. This article aims to place trigger point dry needling within the context of pain sciences. From a pain science perspective, trigger points are constant sources of peripheral nociceptive input leading to peripheral and central sensitization. Dry needling cannot only reverse some aspects of central sensitization, it reduces local and referred pain, improves range of motion and muscle activation pattern, and alters the chemical environment of trigger points. Trigger point dry needling should be based on a thorough understanding of the scientific background of trigger points, the differences and similarities between active and latent trigger points, motor adaptation, and central sensitize application. Several outcome studies are included, as well as comments on dry needling and acupuncture.

Neck muscle length modulates nociceptive reflex evoked by noxious irritant application to rat neck tissues

The application of mustard oil (MO), a small-fibre excitant and inflammatory irritant, into neck paraspinal muscles of the rat has been shown to produce a significant reflexive increase in electromyographic (EMG) activity in both neck and jaw muscles. It is possible that this nociceptive reflex activity is influenced by muscle length since recent evidence indicates that abnormal neck posture may be associated with cervical musculoskeletal disorders and pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test if muscle length modulates this nociceptive reflex response. Three different experimental procedures were employed in rats under halothane anesthesia: (1) MO injected into the left deep neck muscles with the rat placed in a straight body position (Straight group, n = 7); (2) MO injected into lengthened left deep neck muscles with the rat's neck rotated 45 degrees to the right with respect to the head (Stretched group, n = 11); and (3) MO injected into the right deep neck muscles with the rat's neck rotated 45 degrees to the right (Relaxed group, n = 9). The EMG activity of the deep neck, trapezius, and digastric muscles was bilaterally recorded, rectified and integrated into area under the curve (AUC). Control injections of the vehicle, mineral oil, did not evoke any muscle activity but MO evoked EMG activity in the ipsilateral deep neck and trapezius muscles of the Stretched group that was significantly greater than that evoked in the same muscles in the Straight and Relaxed groups. Also, the MO-evoked EMG activity in the contralateral deep neck muscles of the Stretched and Relaxed groups was greater than that of the corresponding muscles in the Straight group. The MO-evoked activity in the digastric, a jaw muscle whose length was not changed, did not show any significant difference between the three groups. These findings indicate that MO application to the rat deep neck muscles results in a larger nociceptive reflex in deep neck and trapezius muscles when they are stretched. This enhanced muscle activity could be associated with changes in the susceptibility of the neck muscles to pain or damage.

Prophylactic tolperisone for post-exercise muscle soreness causes reduced isometric force--a double-blind randomized crossover control study

The role of tolperisone hydrochloride, a centrally acting muscle relaxant in relieving painful muscle spasm is recently being discussed. The present study hypothesizes that the prophylactic use of tolperisone hydrochloride may effectively relieve post-exercise muscle soreness, based on the spasm theory of exercise pain. Twenty male volunteers, aged 25.2 +/- 0.82 years (mean +/- SEM) participated in 10 sessions in which they received oral treatment with placebo or the centrally acting muscle relaxant tolperisone hydrochloride (150 mg) three times daily for 8 days, in randomized crossover double-blind design. Time course assessments were made for pressure pain threshold, Likert's pain score (0-5), pain areas, range of abduction, isometric force, and electromyography (EMG) root mean square (RMS) during maximum voluntary isometric force on day 1 and 6, immediately after an eccentric exercise of first dorsal interosseous muscle, and 24 and 48 h after the exercise. Treatment with placebo or tolperisone hydrochloride was initiated immediately after the assessments on the first day baseline assessments. On the sixth day baseline investigations were repeated and then the subjects performed six bouts of standardized intense eccentric exercise of first dorsal interosseous muscle for provocation of post-exercise muscle soreness (PEMS). Perceived intensity of warmth, tiredness, soreness and pain during the exercise bouts were recorded on a 10 cm visual analogue pain scale. VAS scores and pressure pain thresholds did not differ between tolperisone and placebo treatment. All VAS scores increased during the exercise bouts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 as compared to bout 1. Increased pain scores and pain areas were reported immediately after, 24 and 48 h after exercise. Pressure pain thresholds were reduced at 24 and 48 h after the exercise in the exercised hand. Range of abduction of the index finger was reduced immediately after the exercise and was still reduced at 24 h as compared to the non-exercised hand. The EMG RMS amplitude was also reduced immediately after the exercise, but was increased at 24 and 48 h. Isometric force was reduced immediately after the exercise as compared to days 1, 6, and the 24 and 48 h post-exercise assessments with a greater reduction following the tolperisone hydrochloride treatment and the reduction was more in tolperisone group as compared to the placebo group. The results suggest, that the prophylactic intake of tolperisone hydrochloride provides no relief to pain in course of post-exercise muscle soreness but results in reduction in isometric force.

Referred craniofacial pain patterns in patients with temporomandibular disorder

BACKGROUND

Referred pain is prevalent in the craniofacial region, and it would be helpful for dental practitioners to have drawings delineating regions with a high probability for a patient's referred pain source.

METHODS

The author applied firm pressure for approximately five seconds to trigger points, nodules of spot tenderness, and selected masticatory structures within the head and neck region on 230 patients with temporomandibular disorder, or TMD. As firm pressure was being applied, subjects were asked whether pain was developing or intensifying in a location different than that being palpated.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six subjects (85 percent) reported that referred pain was being generated. The cheek area, ear and forehead were the most frequently reported sites of referred pain generation; palpation over the trapezius muscle, lateral pterygoid area and masseter muscle were the most common sources of referred pain to the craniofacial region. The author provides figures displaying common referred pain sites and their sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TMD often report referred craniofacial pain arising from palpation of the head and neck region. The author found that the pattern between referred pain source and site was consistent and predictable.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Practitioners should consider craniofacial pain's propensity for referral when treating patients with TMD. Practitioners can use the figures presented to determine regions of high probability for a patient's referred pain source.