The use of the Ganga Hospital Score to predict the treatment and outcome of open fractures of the tibia

Contemporary management of open extremity fractures: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Open extremity fractures are high-risk injuries prone to significant complications, including soft tissue loss, bone defects, infection, infected nonunion, and the necessity for limb amputation. Large-scale multicenter prospective studies from the Lower Extremity Assessment Project and the Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium have provided novel scientific insights pertinent to the timeliness and appropriateness of specific treatment modalities aimed at improving outcomes of patients with open extremity injuries. These include the imperative for early administration of intravenous antibiotics within 3 hours of injury, preferably within 1 hour of hospital admission. Unlike the proven value of early antibiotics, the time to initial surgical debridement does not appear to affect infection rates and patient outcomes. Recent evidence-based consensus guidelines from the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons provide scientific guidance for preventing surgical site infections in patients with open extremity fractures and support the decision making of limb salvage versus amputation in critical open extremity injuries. Patient survival represents the overarching priority in the management of any trauma patient with associated orthopedic injuries. Therefore, the timing and modality of managing open fractures must take into account the patient's physiology, response to resuscitation, and overall injury burden. The present review was designed to provide a state-of-the-art overview on the recommended diagnostic workup and management strategies for patients with open extremity fractures, based on the current scientific evidence.

Clinical effectiveness of the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score for limb salvage versus amputation in patients with complex limb injuries : a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Clinical management of open fractures is challenging and frequently requires complex reconstruction procedures. The Gustilo-Anderson classification lacks uniform interpretation, has poor interobserver reliability, and fails to account for injuries to musculotendinous units and bone. The Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score (GHOISS) was designed to address these concerns. The major aim of this review was to ascertain the evidence available on accuracy of the GHOISS in predicting successful limb salvage in patients with mangled limbs.

METHODS

We searched electronic data bases including PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies that employed the GHOISS risk tool in managing complex limb injuries published from April 2006, when the score was introduced, until April 2021. Primary outcome was the measured sensitivity and specificity of the GHOISS risk tool for predicting amputation at a specified threshold score. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, need for plastic surgery, deep infection rate, time to fracture union, and functional outcome measures. Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using a random effects bivariate binomial model.

RESULTS

We identified 1,304 records, of which six prospective cohort studies and two retrospective cohort studies evaluating a total of 788 patients were deemed eligible for inclusion. A diagnostic test meta-analysis conducted on five cohort studies, with 474 participants, showed that GHOISS at a threshold score of 14 has a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.4 to 98.2) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 88.7 to 97.9) for predicting primary or secondary amputations in people with complex lower limb injuries.

CONCLUSION

GHOISS is highly accurate in predicting success of limb salvage, and can inform management and predict secondary outcomes. However, there is a need for high-quality multicentre trials to confirm these findings and investigate the effectiveness of the score in children, and in predicting secondary amputations.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):21-28.

Orthoplastic Reconstruction of Type IIIB Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Using Debrided, Devitalized Cortical Segments: Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients who sustained type IIIB open tibial diaphyseal (OTA/AO-42) fractures and underwent orthoplastic reconstruction using mechanically relevant devitalized bone (ORDB) versus those who did not require the use of devitalized bone as part of their orthoplastic reconstruction.

DESIGN

Consecutive cohort study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The study included 74 patients who sustained a type IIIB open tibial diaphyseal fracture requiring orthoplastic reconstruction over a 4-year period in a major trauma center. All patients underwent a two-stage orthoplastic reconstruction protocol, with the second stage consisting of definitive fixation and flap coverage (free fascial anterolateral thigh flap) in a single sitting. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 30 months to measure HRQoL.

INTERVENTION

Patients requiring ORDB versus those who did not require the use of devitalized bone as part of their orthoplastic reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was HRQoL ascertained using Euro-Qol (EQ)-5D and Short-Form (SF)-36 scores.

RESULTS

Thirty (n = 30) patients underwent ORDB with the remaining 44 not requiring devitalized bone as part of their reconstruction. The median age was 46.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 29.0], with a median follow-up of 3.8 years (IQR 1.5). The median cohort EQ-5D was 0.743 (IQR 0.222), ORDB 0.743 (IQR 0.195) versus non-ORDB 0.748 (IQR 0.285), P = 0.71. The median physical component SF-36 score was 80 (IQR 50), ORDB 80 (IQR 34.5) versus non-ORDB 77.5 (IQR 58.75), P = 0.72. The median mental component SF-36 score was 80 (IQR 28), ORDB 80 (IQR 21) versus non-ORDB 80 (IQR 36), P = 0.29.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who sustained a type IIIB open tibial shaft fracture and who underwent a 2-stage orthoplastic reconstruction, ORDB does not seem to be associated with inferior health-related quality of life based on EQ-5D or SF-36 scores. The results of this approach should be considered within the strict combined orthoplastic approach in the study unit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Open tibial fractures: An overview

Open tibial fractures are complex injuries with multifactorial outcomes and variable prognosis. The close proximity of the tibia to the skin makes it prone to extensive soft tissue damage and subsequent detrimental complications, such as infection and non-union. Thus, they were historically associated with high rates of amputation, sepsis, or even death. The advancement of surgical instruments and techniques, along the emergence of evidence-based guidance, have resulted in a significant reduction in complications. Peculiarly though, modern management strategies have a strong foundation in practices described in the ancient times. Nevertheless, post-operative complications are still a challenge in the management of open tibial fractures. Efforts are actively being made to refine the surgical approaches used, while noteworthy is the emergence of the Orthoplastic approach. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the historical perspective of the management of open tibial fractures, their epidemiology and classification, up-to-date principles of surgical management and outcomes following injury.

Successful Limb Salvage Using an Orthoplastic Approach of Type IIIB Open Injuries of the Shoulder: A Report of 3 Cases

CASE

We report 3 adult men (aged 28, 34, and 71 years) with successfully salvaged mangled injuries around the shoulder with high threshold for amputation. Assessment by Mangled Extremity Severity Score, Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association-Open Fracture Classification open injury scores predicted amputation. However, extended salvage was performed by orthoplastic approach. Two of them had superior shoulder suspensory complex (SSSC) injury. The QuickDASH score was high in 2 patients with SSSC injury and a good score in the third patient who achieved good shoulder motion.

CONCLUSION

"Orthoplastic approach" achieves successful limb salvage in severely mangled shoulder injuries. Volume of muscle crush injury and double disruption of SSSC injury were the main determinants of outcome.

Modern management of paediatric tibial shaft fractures: an evidence-based update

AIMS

This review provides a summary of recent evidence surrounding the treatment of paediatric tibial shaft fractures and presents an algorithm to aid management of these injuries. This article reviews the relevant anatomy, epidemiology and aetiology of tibial shaft fractures and summarises contemporary treatment principles. Management recommendations and supporting evidence are given for fractures according to age (< 18 months, 18 months-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-18 years). The relative merits of casting, plate fixation, elastic and rigid intramedullary nailing, and external fixation are discussed. Special attention is paid to the management of open tibial shaft fractures and to complications including infection and acute compartment syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a shift away from non-operative management of paediatric tibial shaft fractures over the last 30 years. However, recent evidence highlights that a non-operative approach produces acceptable outcomes when used in simple closed fractures at any age. Operative management may be indicated for unstable fractures where satisfactory alignment cannot be maintained or in specific circumstances including open injuries and polytrauma. Open injuries require urgent assessment by a combined orthopaedic and plastic surgery team at a specialist tertiary centre.

Standards of open lower limb fracture care in the United Kingdom

Open fractures of the lower limb remain a potentially devastating group of injuries that are challenging to manage. The primary aims of treatment are to optimise limb function and avoid serious complications such as infection and non-union, which are costly for both the patient and healthcare system. The management of these fractures has evolved significantly, and this is evident following the creation of national open fracture guidelines and a formal trauma system. These have served to standardise care for these injuries in the United Kingdom. The aim of this review is to update our colleagues on the current standard of lower limb open fracture care in the United Kingdom, and the impact this has had on patient outcomes.

The Orthopaedic Trauma Society classification of open fractures

AIMS

To describe a new objective classification for open fractures of the lower limb and to correlate the classification with patient-centred outcomes.

METHODS

The proposed classification was investigated within a cohort of adults with open fractures of the lower limb who were recruited as part of two large clinical trials within the UK Major Trauma Network. The classification was correlated with patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life in the year after injury, and with deep infection at 30 days, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of a deep surgical site infection.

RESULTS

A total of 748 participants were included in the analysis. Of these, 288 (38.5%) had a simple open fracture and 460 (61.5%) had a complex fracture as defined by the new classification system. At 12 months, the mean DRI in the simple fracture group was 32.5 (SD 26.8) versus 43.9 (SD 26.1) in the complex fracture group (odds ratio (OR) 8.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.69 to 12.69). At 12 months the mean health-related quality of life (EQ-5D utility) in the simple fracture group was 0.59 (SD 0.29) versus 0.56 (SD 0.32) in the complex fracture group (OR -0.03; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02). The differences in the rate of deep infection at 30 days was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The Orthopaedic Trauma Society open fracture classification is based upon objective descriptors of the injury and correlates with patient-centred outcomes in a large cohort of open fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1469-1474.