1
|
Walsh A, Zhang Y, McGough J, Kim J, Hausman M. Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Simple Versus Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2023; 48:1059.e1-1059.e9. [PMID: 35545488 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current teaching suggests that modified Mason type III and IV fractures of the radial head involving more than 3 fragments should be treated with radial head arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of simple (2 or fewer intra-articular pieces) versus comminuted (3 or more intra-articular pieces) radial head fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS This was a retrospective review of 35 patients with modified Mason type III and IV fractures treated with ORIF. For the purpose of our study, simple fractures were defined as having 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Comminuted fractures were defined as having 3 or more intra-articular fragments. The primary outcomes were Broberg and Morrey rating system and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Reoperation rates and complications were also noted. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 39.3 months. Thirteen patients had radial head fractures consisting of 2 or fewer intra-articular fragments. Twenty-two patients had radial head fractures consisting of 3 or more intra-articular fragments. Ages and follow-up times were similar in the 2 groups. Similar QuickDASH and Broberg and Morrey scores were seen when evaluating subgroups of 2, 3, and 4 fragment fractures. One patient from each group underwent revision surgery for symptomatic hardware. CONCLUSIONS In our series, we found similar clinical outcome scores and reoperation rates between simple and comminuted radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Fractures with more than 3 intra-articular fragments can be considered for ORIF. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jaehon Kim
- Pan Am Clinic, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heifner JJ, Mercer DM. Improved Understanding of Traumatic Complex Elbow Instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023; 7:01979360-202309000-00014. [PMID: 37747701 PMCID: PMC10519515 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-23-00041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Recent advancements in surgical treatment have improved clinical results in complex traumatic elbow injury. There is increasing recognition that conservative treatment and inadequate surgical fixation carry high risk of substantial morbidity in many of these cases. Recent literature displays improved outcomes in complex elbow instability, in part, because of a more complete comprehension of the injury patterns and fixation methods. Prompt surgical management with stable internal fixation, which permits immediate postoperative mobilization, has been a consistent variable across the reports leading to more satisfactory outcomes. This applies to both acute and chronic cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J. Heifner
- From the Miami Orthopaedic Research Foundation, Miami, FL (Dr. Heifner), and the University of New Mexico Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Albuquerque, NM (Dr. Mercer)
| | - Deana M. Mercer
- From the Miami Orthopaedic Research Foundation, Miami, FL (Dr. Heifner), and the University of New Mexico Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Albuquerque, NM (Dr. Mercer)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klug A, Sauter M, Hoffmann R. [Terrible triad injuries]. UNFALLCHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 126:679-686. [PMID: 37115205 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01321-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
The complex injury pattern of a posterior elbow dislocation with concomitant radial head and coronoid fractures is usually referred to as a terrible triad injury. Due to the concomitant compromise of several osteoligamentous structures of the elbow joint relevant for stability, these injuries pose a particularly major challenge to the treating trauma surgeons. For this reason, a careful preoperative analysis of all relevant injury components is mandatory in order to make an adequate treatment decision. In most cases, surgical treatment addressing all elements relevant for stability is necessary to achieve a stable and congruent elbow joint. Only this enables early functional follow-up treatment and minimizes the complication rate. Delayed or even insufficient treatment with persistent (sub)dislocation must be avoided at all costs, otherwise there is a high risk of serious posttraumatic functional disorders of the elbow with rapid progression of osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Klug
- BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Deutschland.
| | - Matthias Sauter
- BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klug A, Nagy A, Hagebusch P, Fischer S, Gramlich Y, Hoffmann R. Coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries can be safely treated without fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023:10.1007/s00402-023-04889-9. [PMID: 37101086 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04889-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow (TTI) remains topic of ongoing discussion. The aim of this study was to determine whether different treatment strategies for coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries influences the clinical and radiological results in a mid-term follow-up. METHODS A total of 62 patients with surgical treatment of a TTI including a coronoid tip fracture (37 women, 25 men; mean age, 51 years) were available for follow-up assessment after an average of 4.2 years (range 24-110 months). Thirteen patients had O'Driscoll 1.1 and 49 O'Driscoll 1.2 coronoid fractures, of which 26 were treated with and 36 without fixation. Range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score as well as grip strength were evaluated. Radiographs were analyzed for all participants. RESULTS No significant benefit in outcome variables could be detected between patients, whose coronoid had been fixed, compared to patients without fixation of the coronoid. In the coronoid fixation group, patients had mean outcome scores of 81.5 ± SD 19.1 (range 35-100) for MEPS, 31.0 ± SD 12.5 (range 11-48) for OES and 27.7 ± SD 23 (range 0-61) for DASH score, while in the no-fixation group, mean MEPS was 90.8 ± SD 16.5 (range 40-100), mean OES was 39.0 ± SD 10.4 (range 16-48) and mean DASH score was 14.5 ± SD 19.9 (range 0-48). Mean range of motion was 116° ± SD 21° (range 85-140°) versus 124° ± SD 24° (range 80-150°) in extension-flexion and 158° ± SD 23° (range 70-180°) versus 165° ± SD 12° (range 85-180°) in pronation-supination. Overall complication rate was 43.5% and revision rate was 24.2%, with no significant differences between both groups. Suboptimal results were more frequently seen in patients who had degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph. CONCLUSIONS Sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most patients with TTI and coronoid tip fractures. Although some bias in treatment allocation and group heterogeneity cannot be completely omitted, our analysis detected no significant benefit in outcome when the coronoid tip fracture has been fixed compared to patients with non-fixed coronoid tip. Therefore, we would suggest a no-fixation approach for coronoid tip fractures as primary treatment in TTI of the elbow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Klug
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Angela Nagy
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Paul Hagebusch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sebastian Fischer
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Yves Gramlich
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang D, Li J, Xu G, Zhang W, Li L, Tang P, Zhang L. Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question. Front Surg 2022; 9:890744. [PMID: 35983557 PMCID: PMC9379141 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.890744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daofeng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
| | - Jiantao Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
| | - Gaoxiang Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
| | - Wupeng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peifu Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Peifu Tang Licheng Zhang
| | - Licheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Peifu Tang Licheng Zhang
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun Z, Liu W, Liu H, Li J, Hu Y, Tu B, Wang W, Fan C. A new prognostic nomogram for heterotopic ossification formation after elbow trauma : the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction (STEHOP) model. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:963-971. [PMID: 35909382 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b8.bjj-2022-0206.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries. METHODS This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation. RESULTS Male sex, obesity, open wound, dislocations, late definitive surgical treatment, and lack of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as adverse predictors and incorporated to construct the STEHOP model. It displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.84). A high C-index value of 0.77 could still be reached in the internal validation. The calibration plot showed good agreement between nomogram prediction and observed outcomes. CONCLUSION The newly developed STEHOP model is a valid and convenient instrument to predict HO formation after surgery for elbow trauma. It could assist clinicians in counselling patients regarding treatment expectations and therapeutic choices. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):963-971.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixuan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Hang Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Juehong Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuehao Hu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing Tu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| | - Cunyi Fan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Orthopaedic Material Innovation and Tissue Regeneration, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li XY, Wang YL, Yang S, Han PF. Radial head arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update. Exp Ther Med 2022; 24:592. [PMID: 35949335 PMCID: PMC9353546 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE) is a severe high-energy injury to the elbow, mainly including elbow dislocation, coronoid fracture and radial head fracture. It is difficult to maintain the stability of the elbow joint using traditional conservative treatment, and there is a high risk of redislocation and various complications. Therefore, surgical treatment is currently advocated, mainly for repairing damaged ligaments and reconstructing bony structures, but there is still controversy about the treatment plan for the radial head. The current meta-analysis was conducted to compare the differences in efficacy of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of TTIE. Published literature related to the treatment (either ORIF or RHA) of TTIE was searched for in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. According to the search strategy, a total of 1,928 related publications were retrieved. The patient must have been diagnosed with TTIE and required surgery on the radial head. The interventions were RHA and ORIF. Non-case-control studies, case reports, review articles, letters, duplicate reports and literature without sufficient relevant data were excluded. The quality of the literature was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology and the Jadad scale. After data extraction, meta-analysis was performed using ReviewManager 5.4 software (Cochrane). A total of 15 studies involving 455 patients (189 who underwent RHA and 266 who underwent ORIF) were included. Range of motion (ROM) of the forearm (pronation-supination arc) after surgery in the RHA group [95% CI (0.28, 9.59); P=0.04] was found to be significantly superior to the ORIF group, with a lower incidence of complications [95% CI (0.22, 0.84); P=0.01]. However, there was no statistically significant difference for the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score nor for ROM of the elbow (flexion-extension arc). Overall, compared with the ORIF group, the RHA group had better forearm rotational ROM and fewer complications after surgery. Therefore, RHA was found to be superior to ORIF in the treatment of TTIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi-Yong Li
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China
| | - Yun-Lu Wang
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China
| | - Su Yang
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China
| | - Peng-Fei Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weissman JP, Plantz MA, Gerlach EB, Cantrell CK, Butler B. 30-Day outcomes analysis of surgical management of radial head fractures comparing radial head arthroplasty to open reduction internal fixation. J Orthop 2022; 30:36-40. [PMID: 35241885 PMCID: PMC8857409 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation are two commonly utilized treatment options for radial head fractures. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of and risk factors for short-term complications following radial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation of radial head fractures. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients that underwent radial head arthroplasty or open reduction internal fixation for radial head fractures between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2017. The incidence of various 30-day complications, including unplanned readmission, reoperation, non-home discharge, mortality, surgical/medical complications, and extended length-of-stay were compared between the two propensity matched groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for various short-term complications. RESULTS After propensity matching, a total of 435 patients were included in our analysis. 250 patients underwent radial head arthroplasty, and 185 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation. Arthroplasty treated patients had a significantly longer mean total operative time (p = .031) and length-of-stay (p = .003). No significant 30-day complications differences were found for unplanned readmission, reoperation, non-home discharge, mortality, surgical complications or medical complications. Independent risk factors for any complications of both procedures included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. Significant risk factors for length-of-stay greater than two days included a history of bleeding disorder and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. CONCLUSION Our study revealed there were no significant differences in 30-day perioperative surgical or medical complications from either surgical treatment of radial head fractures; however, radial head arthroplasty treated patients were met with a significantly longer length-of-stay and longer duration of operating time. We also identified risk factors that were independently associated with higher rates of complications regardless of treatment type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P. Weissman
- Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 676 North Saint Clair-Suite 1350, Chicago, IL, 60611.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|