Risk factors for early dislocation of the hip after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis

Novel positioning guiders accurately assist in situ acetabular reconstruction for patients undergoing pelvic bone tumor resection

PURPOSE

Acetabular reconstruction in situ after extensive pelvic resection is technically challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of positioning guiders for acetabular reconstruction following pelvic tumor resection and the clinical benefit brought by the approach.

METHODS

The study included patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis. In the guider-assisted group (n = 14), guiders were designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 18), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the guiders. The displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery was calculated. The complications and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society-93 scores were documented.

RESULTS

The overall displacement of the hip rotation center was significantly reduced in the guider-assisted group compared with the traditional operation group (13.83 ± 4.06 vs. 22.95 ± 9.18 mm in P = 0.000, 95%CI 3.90-12.96), especially in the anteroposterior axis (3.77 ± 3.03 versus 13.51 ± 9.43 mm in P = 0.000, 95%CI 3.45-13.09). Guider-assisted acetabular reconstruction reduced the risk of prosthesis dislocation compared with the traditional operation (dislocation risks: 1/14, 7.1% vs. 4/18, 22.2%).

CONCLUSION

Positioning guiders can effectively and conveniently help place the modular hemipelvic prosthesis at the native position, which might potentially reduce the risk of prosthesis dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

LUMiC Endoprosthetic Reconstruction of Periacetabular Tumor Defects: A Multicenter Follow-up Study

UPDATE

This article was updated on July 17, 2024 because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. The byline that had read "Richard E. Evenhuis, MD 1 , Michiel A.J. van de Sande, MD, PhD 1,2 , Marta Fiocco, PhD 2,3,4 , Demien Broekhuis, MD 1 , Michaël P.A. Bus, MD, PhD 1 , and the LUMiC® Study Group*" now reads "Richard E. Evenhuis, MD 1 , Michiel A.J. van de Sande, MD, PhD 1,2 , Marta Fiocco, PhD 2,3,4 , Edwin F. Dierselhuis, MD, PhD 5 , Demien Broekhuis, MD 1 , Michaël P.A. Bus, MD, PhD 1 , and the LUMiC® Study Group*". The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, has been added as the affiliation for Edwin F. Dierselhuis, MD, PhD.

BACKGROUND

We previously reported promising early results for periacetabular tumor reconstructions using the LUMiC prosthesis. The current study evaluates mid-term complications, revision rates, cumulative incidence of implant revision, and risk factors for complications in a multicenter cohort.

METHODS

We assessed patients in whom a tumor defect after type P1b+2, P2, P2+3, or P1b+2+3 internal hemipelvectomy was reconstructed with a LUMiC prosthesis during the period of 2008 to 2022. Complications were reported according to the Henderson classification. Competing risks models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of implant revision for mechanical and nonmechanical reasons, and reoperations for any complication. Cox models were used to study the effect of risk factors on dislocation and infection.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six patients (median follow-up, 4.2 years [interquartile range, 2.6 to 7.6 years]) were included. A total of 114 (69%) were treated for a primary malignant tumor, 46 (28%) for metastatic carcinoma, 5 (3%) for a benign aggressive lesion, and 1 (1%) for another reason. One hundred and sixty-five reoperations were performed in 82 (49%) of the patients; 104 (63%) of the reoperations were within 6 months. Thirty-two (19%) of 166 implants were revised: 13 (8%) for mechanical reasons, mainly dislocation (n = 5, 3%), and 19 (11%) for nonmechanical reasons, mainly periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 15, 9%). The cumulative incidences of revision for mechanical reasons and PJI (Henderson 1 to 4) at 2, 5, and 10 years were 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 17%), 18% (12% to 25%), and 24% (16% to 33%), respectively. Previous surgery at the same site was associated with an increased dislocation risk (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR CS ], 3.0 [95% CI, 1.5 to 6.4]; p < 0.01), and resections involving the P3 region were associated with an increased infection risk (HR CS , 2.5 [95% CI, 1.4 to 4.7]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a substantial reoperation risk, the LUMiC prosthesis demonstrated its durability in the mid-term, with a low mechanical revision rate and most patients retaining their primary implant. Most complications occur in the first postoperative months. Patients with previous surgery at the same site had an increased dislocation risk and might benefit from more conservative rehabilitation and aftercare. Measures should be aimed at reducing the PJI risk, especially in resections involving the P3 region.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical outcomes in patients with neurological disorders following periacetabular tumor removal and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis

Background

Surgical treatment of musculoskeletal tumors in the periacetabular region present extremely difficult due to the complex anatomy and need for reconstruction. Orthopedic surgeons face more difficulties in patients with neurological conditions, which can cause increased muscle tone, an elevated risk of fractures, and compromised bone quality. There is limited evidence regarding endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumors in individuals with neurological disorders.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study to examine the outcomes of patients with preexisting neurological conditions who underwent surgery to remove periacetabular tumors and who underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction. Clinical presentation, detailed neurological conditions, complications, and functional outcomes were studied.

Results

Sixteen out of the 838 patients were identified (1.91%), with a mean follow-up time of 33 months. The primary neurological conditions encompassed Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cerebral ischemic stroke. Every patient was diagnosed with periacetabular lesions that were either primary or oligometastatic. They underwent tumor resection and subsequently received endoprosthetic reconstruction of the hemipelvis. Three patients developed metastasis lesions later, and two patients experienced tumor recurrence. Five cases experienced hip dislocation-one with periprosthetic fracture and one with surgical site infection. The position of the prosthetic rotating center was not correlated with dislocation. The reoperation rate was 31.25%. The cohort of patients all presented with more extended hospital stays and rehabilitation. In 3 patients, the general functional score was good, while in 6 patients, it was fair; in 7 patients, it was regarded as poor. The average MSTS93 score was 49.71%.

Conclusion

Endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection is an effective way to eliminate tumors and salvage limbs. However, this group of patients has an increased likelihood of secondary surgery, complications, extended hospital stay, and no significant improvement in functional outcomes. Despite the diverse nature of the cohort, it is recommended to consider enhanced soft tissue reconstruction, supervised functional recovery and rehabilitation training.

Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes

Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis with pedicle screw-rod system and sacral tray using finite element analysis. Methods: Four models that included one intact pelvis were established for validation. Forces of 500 N and 2,000 N were applied, respectively, to simulate static bipedal standing and the most loaded condition during a gait cycle. Biomechanical analysis was performed, and the results were compared; the preliminary outcomes of four patients were recorded. Results: For the reconstructed hemipelvis, stress was mainly concentrated on the sacral screws, bone-prosthesis interface, and upper endplate of the L5 vertebra. The optimization of the design with the sacral tray structure could decrease the peak stress of the sacral screws by 18.6%, while the maximal stress of the prosthesis increased by 60.7%. The addition of the lumbosacral pedicle-rod system further alleviated stress of the sacral screws and prosthesis by 30.2% and 19.4%, respectively. The site of peak stress was contemporaneously transferred to the connecting rods within an elastic range. In the retrospective clinical study, four patients who had undergone prosthetic reconstruction were included. During a follow-up of 16.6 ± 7.5 months, the walking ability was found preserved in all patients who are still alive and no prosthesis-related complications had occurred except for one hip dislocation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was found to be 19.5 ± 2.9. Conclusion: The novel reconstructive system yielded favorable biomechanical characteristics and demonstrated promising preliminary outcomes. The method can be used as a reference for reconstruction after type I + II + III hemipelvectomy.

3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis combined with a dual mobility bearing in patients with primary malignant neoplasm involving the acetabulum: clinical outcomes and finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage reconstruction for pelvic tumors, especially periacetabular tumors, is challenging. We combined the use of dual mobility bearing and 3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis to improve function and reduce the probability of complications after hemi-pelvic resection in patients with primary acetabular malignancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination.

METHODS

Between October 2011 and May 2021, 11 patients with malignancies involving the acetabulum received hemipelvic replacement with a 3D-printed prosthesis and dual mobility bearing. Follow-up of postoperative survival, complications, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS-93) lower limb functional scores were carried out. A finite element model of the postoperative pelvis was developed and input into the finite element analysis software. The Von Mises equivalent stress formula was used to analyze the stress distribution of each part of the pelvis under one gait cycle and the stress distribution at different angles of the hip joint.

RESULTS

By the last follow-up, 9 of the 11 patients (81.8%) were still alive, and 2 patients had local tumor recurrence. The complications including 1 deep infection and 1 dislocation of the artificial joint. Excluding 1 amputation patient, the average score of the remaining 8 patients at the last follow-up was 21.4/30 (71.3%) on the MSTS-93. In the reconstructed pelvis, stress distributions were concentrated on the junction between hemipelvic prosthesis and screw and iliac bone on the resected side, and between femoral prosthesis stem and femoral bulb, while the stress of polyethylene lining was small. Before impact, the polyethylene lining will rotate at a small angle, about 3°. The inner stress of polyethylene liner is greater than the outer stress in all conditions. The polyethylene liner has no tendency to slide out.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction using 3D-printed hemipelvic prosthesis combined with dual mobility bearing was an effective treatment for pelvic tumors. Our patients achieved good early postoperative efficacy and functional recovery. The dual mobility bearing is beneficial to prevent dislocation, and the mechanical distribution and wear of the prosthesis are acceptable.

Risk factor investigation for hip dislocation after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction via thin-slice CT-based 3D model

AIMS

Dislocation of the hip remains a major complication after periacetabular tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The position of the acetabular component is an important modifiable factor for surgeons in determining the risk of postoperative dislocation. We investigated the significance of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal displacement of the hip centre of rotation (COR) on postoperative dislocation using a CT-based 3D model, as well as other potential risk factors for dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients who underwent reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumour between January 2011 and January 2020 were studied. The risk factors for dislocation were investigated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on patient-specific, resection-specific, and reconstruction-specific variables.

RESULTS

The dislocation rate was 13.9% (n = 17). The hip COR was found to be significantly shifted anteriorly and inferiorly in most patients in the dislocation group compared with the non-dislocation group. Three independent risk factors were found to be related to dislocation: resection of gluteus medius (odds ratio (OR) 3.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 19.70); p = 0.039), vertical shift of COR > 18 mm (OR 24.8 (95% CI 6.23 to 128.00); p = 0.001), and sagittal shift of COR > 20 mm (OR 6.22 (95% CI 1.33 to 32.2); p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Among the 17 patients who dislocated, 70.3% (n = 12) were anterior dislocations. Three independent risk factors were identified, suggesting the importance of proper restoration of the COR and the role of the gluteus medius in maintaining hip joint stability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1180-1188.

[Application of modified Gibson combined with modified ilioinguinal approach in treatment of Enneking + pelvic malignant tumors with three-dimensional printed hemipelvic prosthesis replacement]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the surgical skills of modified Gibson combined with modified ilioinguinal (MGMII) approach in the treatment of Enneking Ⅱ+Ⅲ pelvic malignant tumors in the three-dimensional (3D) printed customized integrated hemipelvic prosthesis, and to evaluate the convenience and accuracy of the surgical approach and the short-term effectiveness.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and March 2019, 7 patients with Enneking Ⅱ+Ⅲ pelvic malignant tumors were treated with tumor resection and 3D printed hemipelvic prosthesis replacement via MGMII approach. There were 6 males and 1 female. The age ranged from 23 to 68 years, with an average of 43.7 years. There was 1 chondrosarcoma, 1 Ewing's sarcoma, 1 osteosarcoma, 1 malignant Schwannoma, 2 metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma, and 1 metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. The Enneking stage of 4 cases of primary malignant tumor was stage ⅡB. The disease duration was 6-12 months, with an average of 9.5 months. The preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was 82.1±1.4 and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21.4±1.1. The tumor size by imaging examination was 5.1-9.1 cm, with an average of 6.9 cm. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion volume, and postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative pathological examination confirmed tumor residue according to R classification criteria. The lower limb length, acetabular height, acetabular eccentricity, abduction angle, and anteversion angle were measured and the bone integration was observed by imaging review. Bilateral abductor muscle strengths were measured, and joint function was evaluated by MSTS score and HHS score.

RESULTS

All operations were successfully completed. The operation time was 210-360 minutes (mean, 280.0 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 1 300-2 500 mL (mean, 1 785.7 mL); the postoperative blood transfusion volume was 0-11 U (mean, 6.1 U). Postoperative pathological examination confirmed R0 resection assisted by osteotomy guide plate. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 30-48 months (mean, 41.3 months). At last follow-up, the imaging review showed the good osseointegration in all 7 cases. There was no significant difference in the lower limb length, acetabular height, acetabular eccentricity, abduction angle, and anteversion angle between the affected side and the healthy side ( P>0.05), all of which met the requirements of anatomical reconstruction. At 3 months after operation, the ratios of muscle strength between the affected side and the healthy side was 68.29%±7.41% at 3 months and 89.86%±2.79% at 12 months, showing a significant difference between the two time points ( t=8.242, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the MSTS score and HHS score were 27.3±0.8 and 96.6±1.4, respectively, which significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). None of the patients had assisted walking at last follow-up. There was no recurrence, death, or complications such as deep infection, dislocation of the prosthesis, or fracture of the prosthesis or screw.

CONCLUSION

MGMII approach can expose the posterior column of the acetabulum, especially the ischial tubercle, which is helpful to avoid tumor rupture during tumor resection and preserve the muscle functions such as gluteus medius and iliac muscle while ensuring the resection scope.

New adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis replacement with 3D-print osteotomy guide plate used in periacetabular malignant tumors: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular malignant tumor seriously endangers the life and health of patients. Hemipelvic replacement provides a good method for patients who want complete resection of the tumor while retaining or restoring the function of the affected limb.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance and clinical application of the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis and to compare the effects of three kinds of hemipelvic prosthesis.

METHODS

In this study, 23 patients, with an average age of 44.6 years (21-75 years), were collected, who received hemipelvic replacement with new adjustable, modular, and screw-rod system hemipelvic prosthesis. Preoperative preparation was conducted on them, and operative complications were recorded. Postoperative functional follow-up was performed regularly.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 319 min (170-480 min), and the average blood loss was 2813 ml (1000 mL-8000 ml). The incidence of complications was 47.8%, and type A (wound-related complications) had the highest incidence (34.8%). Postoperative dislocation occurred in 3 cases (13.0%), and no dislocation occurred in the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis group. The average MSTS score of the patients was 18.6 (10-23), and the average Harris score was 73.7 (53-87).

CONCLUSIONS

The new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis has the feasibility of reconstruction and good functional outcome, making it ideal for periacetabular tumors. Furthermore, preoperative tumor-feeding artery embolization and abdominal aortic balloon implantation may be an effective choice to reduce intraoperative blood loss and facilitate the operation of tumor resection.

[Biomechanical analysis and effectiveness evaluation of zone ++ reconstruction of hemipelvis with rod-screw prosthesis]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the biomechanical properties of the rod-screw prosthesis based on a pelvic three-dimensional finite element model including muscle and ligament, and evaluate the effectiveness of zoneⅠ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ reconstruction of hemipelvis with rod-screw prosthesis in combination with clinical applications.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients who underwent hemipelvic tumor resection (zoneⅠ+Ⅱ+Ⅲ) and rod-screw prosthesis reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. Among them, there were 11 males and 10 females; the age ranged from 16 to 64 years, with an average age of 39.2 years. There were 9 cases of chondrosarcoma, 7 cases of osteosarcoma, 3 cases of Ewing sarcoma, and 2 cases of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. According to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) staging, there were 19 cases of stage ⅡB and 2 cases of stage Ⅲ. Preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and MSTS score were 54.4±3.1 and 14.1±2.0, respectively. Intraoperative 15 cases underwent extensive resection, 5 cases underwent marginal resection, and 1 case underwent intralesional resection. The CT image of 1 patient after reconstruction was used to establish a three-dimensional solid model of the pelvis via Mimics23Suite and 3-matic softwares. At the same time, a mirror operation was used to obtain a normal pelvis model, then the two solid models were imported into the finite element analysis software Workbench 2020R1 to establish three-dimensional finite element models, and the biomechanical properties of the standing position were analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and operation-related complications were recorded, and the postoperative evaluation was carried out with HHS and MSTS scores. Finally, the local recurrence and metastasis were reviewed.

RESULTS

Finite element analysis showed that the peak stress of the reconstructed pelvis appeared at the fixed S_{1, 2} rod-screw connections; the peak stress without muscles was higher than that after muscle construction, but much smaller than the yield strength of titanium alloy. The operation time was 250-370 minutes, with an average of 297 minutes; the amount of intraoperative blood loss was 3 200-5 500 mL, with an average of 4 009 mL. All patients were followed up 8-72 months, with an average of 42 months. There were 7 cases of pulmonary metastasis, of which 2 cases were preoperative metastasis; 5 cases died, 16 cases survived, and the 5-year survival rate was 72.1%. There were 3 cases of local recurrence, all of whom did not achieve extensive resection during operation. The function of the affected limbs significantly improved, and the walking function was restored. The HHS and MSTS scores were 75.2±3.0 and 20.4±2.0 at last follow-up, respectively, and the differences were significant when compared with those before operation (t=22.205, P<0.001; t=11.915, P<0.001). During follow-up, 2 cases of delayed incision healing, 2 cases of deep infection, 1 case of screw loosening, and 1 case of prosthesis dislocation occurred, and no other complication such as prosthesis or screw fracture occurred.

CONCLUSION

The stress and deformation distribution of the reconstructed pelvis are basically the same as normal pelvis. The rod-screw prosthesis is an effective reconstruction method for pelvic malignant tumors.