High-volume revision surgeons have better outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty

"Is every revision the same?" definition of complexity in knee revision surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to define a subset of complex rTKA in terms of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes and complications. The secondary outcome of the authors is to propose a simple and easy-to-use guide for clinical network in rTKA management.

METHODS

Complex rTKAs were defined according to the presence of at least two of the following features: periprosthetic joint infection, re- revision, femoral and/or tibial massive bone defects, soft tissue impairment, stiffness, fracture requiring fixed component revision.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent a standard rTKA (group A) while 24 had a complex rTKA (group B). The mean follow-up was 50.2 ± 16.4 months in group A and 49.5 ± 16.8 in group B (p = 0.44). The operative time was longer in group B (200.4 ± 131.4 min vs 110.2 ± 59.8 min). A greater intraoperative total blood loss (3014.2 ± 740.0 vs 2328.5 ± 620.6 ml, p < 0.001), intra and postoperative blood infusion (3.6 ± 1.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.2 units, p < 0.001) was reported in group B. Significant difference was obtained for global complication rate (11.5% group A vs 37.5% group B, p = 0.04), reoperation (7.7% group A vs 33.3% group B, p = p = 0.03) and re-revision (3.8% group A vs 25% group B, p = p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study describes a specific entity of rTKA that require higher surgical effort and increased surgical challenge (measured as increased surgical time, need of transfusions and complications). The proposed classification could provide an easy-to-use tool for quick grading of complexity in rTKA.

Acetabular Distraction: Promising 5-Year Outcomes for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity

BACKGROUND

Severe acetabular bone loss encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) poses a clinical challenge. In cases involving pelvic discontinuity, where the ilium is separated superiorly from the inferior ischiopubic segment through the acetabulum, acetabular distraction may be used to restore the biomechanics of the hemipelvis. This technique allows for correct sizing of the acetabulum, and the subsequent peripheral distraction and medial compression at the discontinuity provide initial mechanical stability and biological fixation as bone in growth occurs. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess long-term 5-year outcomes following acetabular distraction across 2 institutions.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent revision THA in which the acetabular distraction technique was performed for the treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity between 2002 and 2018. Demographic, operative, and clinical postoperative data were collected. Clinical endpoints included postoperative radiographic outcomes, complications requiring additional surgery, and reoperation for all causes. Only patients who had a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients (Paprosky IIC: one patient, 6.7%; Paprosky IIIA: 5 patients, 33.3%; Paprosky IIIB: 9 patients, 60%) who had a mean follow-up time of 9 years (range, 5.1 to 13.5) were analyzed. Porous tantalum augments were used in 11 (73.3%) cases to primarily address posteriorsuperior defects (100%). There were 4 (26.7%) patients that required reoperation, only 2 of which were for indications related to the acetabular construct, leading to an overall survivorship of 86.7%. Both patients had a prior revision THA before the implementation of the distraction technique. Evidence of bridging callus formation was reported radiographically for 14 (93.3%) patients at the time of the last clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who have chronic pelvic discontinuity, acetabular distraction shows promising long-term outcomes. Even so, larger multi-center studies are needed to better support the efficacy of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster than Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains underexplored regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), particularly in terms of time to reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). This study addresses this gap by comparing the time to achieve MCID between primary TKA (pTKA) and rTKA patients, providing valuable insights into their recovery trajectories.

METHODS

A total of 8,266 TKAs (7,618 pTKA and 648 rTKA) were retrospectively studied in a multi-institutional arthroplasty registry. Patients who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical, PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF-10a), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Survival curves with and without interval-censoring were utilized to evaluate the time to achieve MCID.

RESULTS

Comparing the time to achieve MCID, rTKAs were significantly faster than pTKA for PROMIS Global Physical (3.5 versus 3.7 months, P = 0.004) and KOOS-PS (3.3 versus 4.2 months, P < 0.001), but similar for PROMIS PF-10a (4.4 versus 4.8 months, P = 0.057). Interval-censoring also showed similar trends with earlier times to achieve MCID for rTKAs for PROMIS Global Physical (0.6 to 0.61 versus 0.97 to 0.97 months, P = 0.009) and KOOS-PS (0.97 to 0.97 versus 1.47 to 1.47 months, P < 0.001), but not for PROMIS PF-10a (2.43 to 2.54 versus 1.90 to 1.91 months, P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that the time to achieve MCID was faster in patients undergoing rTKA compared to those undergoing pTKA. These findings allow surgeons to reassure preoperative revision TKA patients that their recovery to a minimal clinically important difference postoperatively may be quicker than expected, especially when compared to their initial recovery after primary TKA.

Fellowship-Trained Surgeons Experience a Learning Curve Performing Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) require considerable surgical proficiency, but are frequently delegated to the least experienced surgeons. This study examined the influence of surgeon experience on revision outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective data on confirmed aseptic rTHAs (n = 122) and rTKAs (n = 195) performed by 4 fellowship-trained surgeons in the same practice were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeons were grouped based on years in practice (inexperienced [IE] first 2 years, early experience [EE] 4 to 6 years, and senior experience [SE] 15 to 17 years). Procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and reoperation rates were compared, controlling for potential covariates.

RESULTS

Procedure durations varied based on surgeon experience for 3 of 4 rTHA diagnoses (P ≤ 0.001). Relative to the SE surgeon, procedure duration was 80.0 (95% confidence interval 61.7 to 98.4, P < 0.001) minutes longer for IE surgeons and 30.9 (95% confidence interval 17.5 to 44.3, P < 0.001) minutes longer for the EE surgeon. Procedure durations also varied based on surgeon experience for 3 of 4 rTKA diagnoses (P < 0.001), with the longest durations for IE surgeons. Procedure durations varied based on the interaction of surgeon experience, patient age, and body mass index. The EBL did not differ in rTHA based on surgeon experience (P = 0.978), but did differ for rTKA (P = 0.004). There were 25% of rTHAs performed by IE surgeons compared to 15.5% for the EE surgeon and 3.6% for the SE surgeon that underwent reoperation within a year of the index procedure (P = 0.064), with significantly more reoperations for the same indication among IE and EE surgeons (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Complex procedures completed by less experienced surgeons may result in longer procedures, higher EBL, and more early reoperations. Study findings implicate a learning curve for revision arthroplasty that continues for several years, warranting consideration of existing patient allocation and referral patterns.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51).

RESULTS

The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted.

Impact of surgeon volume, experience, and training on outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a nationwide analysis of 1489 surgeons

Background

Given the complexity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and increasing prevalence, there is a need for comprehensive, large-scale studies that investigate potential correlations between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes after ARCR. This study examines how surgeon-specific factors including case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice impact two-year reoperation rates, conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse), and 90-day post-ARCR hospitalization.

Methods

The PearlDiver Mariner database was used to collect surgeon-specific variables and query patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018. Patient outcomes were tracked for two years, including reoperations, hospitalizations, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) laterality. Hospitalizations were defined as any emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 90 days after primary ARCR. Surgeon-specific factors including surgeon case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice were analyzed in relation to postoperative outcomes using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

94,150 patients underwent ARCR by 1489 surgeons. On multivariate analysis, high-volume surgeons demonstrated a higher risk for two-year total reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.12, P = .03) and revision RCR (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = .02) compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons showed higher rates of 90-day ED visits (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78, P < .001) and hospital readmission (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, P = .006) compared to mid- and late-career surgeons. Sports medicine and/or shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated lower two-year reoperation risk (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.91-0.99, P = .04) and fewer 90-day ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88-0.98, P = .002). Academic surgeons experienced higher readmission rates compared to community surgeons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = .03). Surgeons practicing in the Northeast demonstrated lower two-year reoperation (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93, P < .001) and revision (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .001) RCR risk compared to surgeons in the Southern United States.

Conclusion

High-volume surgeons exhibit higher two-year reoperation rates after ARCR compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons demonstrate increased hospitalizations. Sports medicine or shoulder and elbow surgery fellowships correlate with reduced two-year reoperation rates and 90-day ED visits.

Optimizing Interhospital Transfers in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery: Challenges, Insights, and Proposals for Standardized Care in Germany

BACKGROUND

Germany's high density of under-equipped hospitals and anticipated surge in orthopedic and trauma surgery-related diseases by 2030, combined with personnel shortages, are expected to increase patient transfers between hospitals, an issue that urgently needs standardized protocols. Despite some existing cooperative agreements, such as between joint-replacement centers or within the Trauma Network DGU®, these measures do not adequately address the full range of patient-transfer cases, including those due to a lack of specialization or staff shortages, resulting in delayed treatment and potential health risks. This study aims to dissect the intricacies of interhospital transfers in orthopedics and trauma surgery across Germany, focusing on understanding the underlying reasons for transfers, comparing the operational structures of small and large hospitals, and laying the groundwork for future standardized protocols to enhance patient care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the form of an online survey via SoSci Survey, which was directed at orthopedic surgeons and trauma surgeons working in hospitals in Germany. The 22-question survey gathered information on participants' clinic roles, departmental details, transfer processes, frequent diagnoses, perceptions of transfer quality, and improvement areas. The survey was sent to orthopedic and trauma surgeons in Germany by the specialist society. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to ensure a comprehensive insight into interhospital transfer practices.

RESULTS

The study involved 152 participants from various hospital ranks and located in different hospital sizes and types across rural and urban areas. A significant difference was observed between the care structures of basic/regular care and central/maximum care hospitals, especially regarding the available facilities and specialties. These findings suggest improvements such as better patient documentation, increased digital communication, optimized patient distribution, and standardization of transfer requests, among others.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the urgent need for improved protocols and resource allocation to eliminate inequalities in transfers between hospitals in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany.

Effect of Surgeon Volume on Mechanical Complications after Resection Arthroplasty with Articulating Spacer

Two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer is a standard treatment for chronic prosthetic knee infection (PKI); however, mechanical complications can occur during the spacer period. There is limited evidence on the association between surgeon volume and mechanical complications after resection arthroplasty (RA) using an articulating spacer. This study aimed to compare the rates of mechanical complications and reoperation after RA with articulating spacers by surgeons with high volumes (HV) and low volumes (LV) of RA performed and analyzed the risk factors for mechanical failure. The retrospective study investigated 203 patients treated with PKIs who underwent RA with articulating spacers and were divided according to the number of RAs performed by the surgeons: HV (≥14 RAs/year) or LV (<14 RAs/year). Rates of mechanical complications and reoperations were compared. Risk factors for mechanical complications were analyzed. Of the 203 patients, 105 and 98 were treated by two HV and six LV surgeons, respectively. The mechanical complication rate was lower in HV surgeons (3.8%) than in LV surgeons (36.7%) (p < 0.001). The reoperation rate for mechanical complications was lower in HV surgeons (0.9%) than in LV surgeons (24.5%) (p < 0.001). Additionally, 47.2% of patients required hinge knees after mechanical spacer failure. Medial proximal tibial angle < 87°, recurvatum angle > 5°, and the use of a tibial spacer without a cement stem extension were risk factors for mechanical complications. Based on these findings, we made the following three conclusions: (1) HV surgeons had a lower rate of mechanical complications and reoperation than LV surgeons; (2) mechanical complications increased the level of constraint in final revision knee arthroplasty; and (3) all surgeons should avoid tibial spacer varus malalignment and recurvatum deformity and always use a cement stem extension with a tibial spacer.

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with comparable functional outcomes but improved forgotten joint scores compared with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty at five-year follow-up

PURPOSE

This study reports the five-year functional outcomes from a prospective cohort study comparing robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) versus conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CO TKA).

METHODS

This prospective single-surgeon study included 120 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee arthritis undergoing primary TKA. This included 60 consecutive patients undergoing CO TKA followed by 60 consecutive patients undergoing RO TKA using a semi-automated robotic device. Study patients were reviewed at one, two, and five years after surgery and the following outcomes recorded: The University of California at Los Angeles activity-level (UCLA), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and any complications.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between RO TKA and CO TKA in the median UCLA score (p = N.S), median KSS (p = N.S), and median OKS (p = N.S) at five-year follow-up. RO-TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS at one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.003), and five (p = 0.025) years of follow-up compared with CO TKA. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia between the two treatment groups (p = N.S).

CONCLUSION

Patients in both treatment groups had excellent functional outcomes with comparable patient reported outcomes at five-year follow-up. RO TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS compared with CO TKA, but these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference at any follow-up interval. There was no overall difference in complications between the two treatment groups at five-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Prospective cohort study).

No Association Between Hospital Volume and Early Second Revision Rate in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Dutch Orthopaedic Register

BACKGROUND

Revision knee arthroplasty (R-KA) is rising globally. Technical difficulty of R-KA varies from liner exchange to full revision. Centralization has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity rates. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between hospital R-KA volume and overall second revision rate, as well as revision rate for different types of revision.

METHODS

The R -KAs between 2010 and 2020 with available data on the primary KA in the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register were included. Minor revisions were excluded. Implant data and anonymous patient characteristics were obtained from the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register. Survival analyses and competing risk analysis were performed per volume category (≤12, 13 to 24, or ≥25 cases/year) at 1, 3, and 5 years following R-KA. There were 8,072 R-KA cases available. Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range 0 to 13.7 years). There were a total of 1,460 second revisions (18.1%) at the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between second revision rates of the three volume groups. Adjusted hazard ratio for second revision were 0.97 (Confidence Interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.11) for hospitals with 13 to 24 cases/year and 0.94 (CI 0.83 to 1.07) with ≥25 cases/year compared to low volume (≤12 cases/year). Type of revision did not influence second revision rate.

CONCLUSION

Second revision rate of R-KA does not seem to be dependent on hospital volume or type of revision in the Netherlands.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Observational registry study.

Declining Geographic Access to High-Volume Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgeons: A National Medicare Analysis

BACKGROUND

While trends in the economics of revision THA (revTHA) procedures have been well-described from the standpoint of both hospitals and surgeons, their population-level effects of these trends on patient access are not well-understood.

METHODS

The Medicare fee-for-service provider utilization and payment public use files were used to extract data for primary and revTHA for beneficiaries between 2013 and 2019. Primary and revTHA procedures were identified using the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code; 27130 for primaries and 27132, 27134, 27137, or 27138 for revisions. Geospatial analyses were performed by aggregating surgeon practice locations at the level of individual counties, hospital service areas, and hospital referral regions.

RESULTS

The number of high-volume primary THA surgeons within the Medicare population increased by 17.6% over the study period (3,838 in 2013 to 4,515 in 2019). Conversely, the number of high-volume revTHA surgeons decreased by 36.1% (178 in 2013 to 129 in 2019). Linear regression revealed a significant increase and decrease in high-volume primary (β = 109.07, P ≤ .001) and revision (β = -13.04, P = .011) THA surgeons, respectively. Over the study period, the number of counties with at least 1 high-volume primary THA surgeon increased by 6.1% (1,194 to 1,267), while the number of counties with at least 1 high-volume revTHA surgeon decreased by 30.2% (159 to 111).

CONCLUSION

The present findings of declining geographic access may represent a consequence of shifting economic incentives and declining reimbursements for the care of complicated revTHA patients.

The impact of a revision arthroplasty network on patient outcomes

Aims

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are complex procedures with higher rates of re-revision, complications, and mortality compared to primary TKA and THA. We report the effects of the establishment of a revision arthroplasty network (the East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network; EMSON) on outcomes of rTKA and rTHA.

Methods

The revision arthroplasty network was established in January 2015 and covered five hospitals in the Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire areas of the East Midlands of England. This comprises a collaborative weekly multidisciplinary meeting where upcoming rTKA and rTHA procedures are discussed, and a plan agreed. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics database, revision procedures carried out between April 2011 and March 2018 (allowing two-year follow-up) from the five network hospitals were compared to all other hospitals in England. Age, sex, and mean Hospital Frailty Risk scores were used as covariates. The primary outcome was re-revision surgery within one year of the index revision. Secondary outcomes were re-revision surgery within two years, any complication within one and two years, and median length of hospital stay.

Results

A total of 57,621 rTHA and 33,828 rTKA procedures were performed across England, of which 1,485 (2.6%) and 1,028 (3.0%), respectively, were conducted within the network. Re-revision rates within one year for rTHA were 7.3% and 6.0%, and for rTKA were 11.6% and 7.4% pre- and postintervention, respectively, within the network. This compares to a pre-to-post change from 7.4% to 6.8% for rTHA and from 11.7% to 9.7% for rTKA for the rest of England. In comparative interrupted time-series analysis for rTKA there was a significant immediate improvement in one-year re-revision rates for the revision network compared to the rest of England (p = 0.024), but no significant change for rTHA (p = 0.504). For the secondary outcomes studied, there was a significant improvement in trend for one- and two-year complication rates for rTHA for the revision network compared to the rest of England.

Conclusion

Re-revision rates for rTKA and complication rates for rTHA improved significantly at one and two years with the introduction of a revision arthroplasty network, when compared to the rest of England. Most of the outcomes studied improved to a greater extent in the network hospitals compared to the rest of England when comparing the pre- and postintervention periods.

The unquantifiable benefits of modern arthroplasty networks

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):590–592.

Is the Centralization of Complex Surgical Procedures an Unintended Spillover Effect of Global Capitation? - Insights from the Maryland Global Budget Revenue Program

OBJECTIVE

To determine if global budget revenue (GBR) models incent the centralization of complex surgical care.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND

In 2014, Maryland initiated a statewide GBR model. While prior research has shown improvements in cost and outcomes for surgical care post-GBR implementation, the mechanism remains unclear.

METHODS

Utilizing state inpatient databases, we compared the proportion of adults undergoing elective complex surgeries (gastrectomy, pneumonectomy/lobectomy, proctectomies, and hip/knee revision) at high-concentration hospitals (HCHs) in Maryland and control states. Annual concentration, per procedure, was defined as hospital volume divided by state volume. HCHs were defined as hospitals with a concentration at least at the 75 th percentile in 2010. We estimated the difference-in-differences (DiD) of the probability of patients undergoing surgery at HCHs before and after GBR implementation.

FINDINGS

Our sample included 122,882 surgeries. Following GBR implementation, all procedures were increasingly performed at HCHs in Maryland. States satisfied the parallel trends assumption for the centralization of gastrectomy and pneumonectomy/lobectomy. Post-GBR, patients were more likely to undergo gastrectomy (DiD: 5.5 p.p., 95% CI [2.2, 8.8]) and pneumonectomy/lobectomy (DiD: 12.4 p.p., 95% CI [10.0, 14.8]) at an HCH in Maryland compared with control states. For our hip/knee revision analyses, we assumed persistent counterfactuals and noted a positive DiD post-GBR implementation (DiD: 4.8 p.p., 95% CI [1.3, 8.2]). No conclusion could be drawn for proctectomy due to different pre-GBR trends.

CONCLUSIONS

GBR implementation is associated with increased centralization for certain complex surgeries. Future research is needed to explore the impact of centralization on patient experience and access.

Assessment of patient satisfaction following revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is becoming an increasingly important measure of healthcare quality. Satisfaction following RTKA is poorly described within the literature, resulting in difficulty for clinicians to manage patient expectations and obtain informed consent.

METHODS

We investigated postoperative satisfaction of RTKA patients by a single surgeon, using a single prosthesis, at a single institution. Patient satisfaction was assessed using structured telephone assessment questionnaires and review of orthopaedic/hospital records. The effect of patient and surgical characteristics on satisfaction was assessed using correlation coefficients and binary logistic regression in SPSS.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two RTKAs were performed in 178 patients between 2004 and 2015 inclusive. One hundred and twenty-four patients (143 RTKAs) were contactable to complete satisfaction assessment. Eighty-five percent of patients were satisfied and would have the RTKA again, 8% were unsure, 7% would not. Mean reported satisfaction on a numerical scale (1-10) was 8.17 (range 1-10), with 74% of patients scoring 8 or above, and 35% of patients scoring 10. The Mahomed Satisfaction Scale outcomes demonstrated a mean score of 87.7. High positive correlation was found between assessment tools. Logistic regression analysis identified factors contributing to satisfaction included ROM, OKS, BMI, and surgical time.

CONCLUSION

This cohort demonstrated high patient satisfaction rate following RTKA, utilizing simple and reliable outcome measurement tools. We found a high positive correlation between methods of assessment, and moderate positive correlation between satisfaction and functional outcomes. These results contribute to the understanding of satisfaction in RTKA patients, which may assist in informing patients of expected post-operative outcomes.

One- or two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee prosthesis?

A prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is possibly the most significant potential complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is associated with substantial morbidity and socioeconomic burden. It is a devastating complication for both the patient and the surgeon alike. A two-stage revision approach for infected TKA has been the standard for surgical management; however, there is growing interest in single-stage revision surgery due to fewer procedures, reduced inpatient hospital stay and reduced costs to healthcare systems. A one-stage exchange is indicated when there is no sign of systemic sepsis and in cases where a microorganism has been isolated. It involves removal of the old prosthesis, debridement of all infected tissue, a copious washout and re-draping, and finally, re-implantation of a new prosthesis. The two-stage approach involves the use of an antibiotic spacer before the second stage is carried out. The length of time between the stages is discussed. Patients with a PJI should be managed by a multidisciplinary team. We recommend these patients are managed in specialist arthroplasty centres by high volume revision arthroplasty specialists.

Posterior-Stabilized Antibiotic Cement Articulating Spacer With Endoskeleton-Reinforced Cam Reduces Rate of Post-Cam Mechanical Complications in Prosthetic Knee Infection: A Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

Posterior-stabilized antibiotic cement articulating spacers (PS spacers) reduce spacer mechanical complications in prosthetic knee infections (PKIs); however, joint dislocation after femoral cam fracture has been reported. We hypothesized that the rate of post-cam mechanical complications is lower in PS spacers with an endoskeleton-reinforced cam.

METHOD

A retrospective study of PKIs using PS spacers with or without a Kirschner wire-reinforced cam (K-PS or nK-PS spacers, respectively) was conducted between 2015 and 2019. The rates of post-cam mechanical complications and reoperation, as well as risk factors for post or cam failure, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 118 nK-PS and 49 K-PS spacers. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The rate of joint subluxation/dislocation after femoral cam fracture was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (17.8%; P = .002). The reoperation rate for spacer mechanical complications was lower in K-PS (0%) than in nK-PS spacers (11.9%; P = .008). The identified risk factors for femoral cam fractures were body mass index ≥25 kg/m², femoral spacer size ≤2, and surgical volume ≤12 resection arthroplasties per year.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study highlights that K-PS spacers have a lower rate of post-cam mechanical complications than nK-PS spacers. We recommend the use of PS spacers with endoskeleton-reinforced cam when treating PKIs performed by surgeons with lower surgical volumes, especially in patients with higher body mass index and smaller femoral spacer sizes.