Additional distal femoral resection increases mid-flexion coronal laxity in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with flexion contracture : a computational study

Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Resection on Gap Balancing in Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is one of the most controversial issues while performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PCL resection on flexion-extension gaps, femoral component rotation, and bone resection amounts during robot-assisted TKA.

METHODS

This prospective study included 40 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent robot-assisted posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA between September 2021 and February 2022. Of the patients, 75% were women (30/40) with a mean age and BMI of 72.6 years and 27.4 kg/m2, respectively. The guidance module and camera stand assembly were used to capture gaps before and after PCL resection. Measurements of femoral component rotation and bone resection amounts were made in cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA mode and PS-TKA mode.

RESULTS

After PCL resection, the mean change in the medial and lateral compartments of flexion gaps increased by 2.0 and 0.6 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with the CR-TKA mode group, the bone resection amounts of the medial posterior condyle and the lateral posterior condyle in the PS-TKA mode group decreased by 2.0 ± 1.1 and 1.1 ± 1.1 mm, respectively, and the external rotation of the femoral prosthesis relative to the posterior condylar axis and trans-epicondylar line was reduced by 1.0° ± 1.3° and 1.2° ± 1.6°, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The release of the PCL did not affect the extension gap, but significantly increased the flexion gap. Moreover, the increases in the medial flexion gap were greater than those of the lateral flexion gap. After PCL resection, less external rotation of the femoral prosthesis and fewer bone cuts of the posterior femur were needed in PS-TKA.

Management of fixed flexion contracture in primary total knee arthroplasty: recent systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to systematically review the literature and identify the surgical management strategy for fixed flexion contracture in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery, pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. Secondary endpoints were etiologies and factors favoring flexion contracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches were carried out in November 2023 in several databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) using the following keywords: "flexion contracture AND TKA", "fixed flexion deformity AND TKA", "posterior capsular release AND TKA", "posterior capsulotomy in TKA", "distal femoral resection AND TKA". Study quality was assessed using the STROBE checklist and the Downs and Black score. Data concerning factors or strategies leading to the development or prevention of flexion contracture after TKA were extracted from the text, figures, and tables of the included references. The effect of each predictive factor on flexion contracture after TKA was recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies described a variety of preoperative and intraoperative factors that contribute to the development or correction of postoperative flexion contracture. The only clearly identified predictor of postoperative flexion contracture was preoperative flexion contracture. Intraoperative steps described to correct flexion contracture were: soft-tissue balancing (in posterior and medial compartments), distal femoral resection, flexion of the femoral component, and posterior condylar resection. However, no study has investigated these factors in a global model.

DISCUSSION

This review identified various pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors predictive of post-operative flexion contracture. In practice, these factors are likely to interact, and it is therefore crucial to further investigate them in a comprehensive model to develop an algorithm for the management of flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with comparable functional outcomes but improved forgotten joint scores compared with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty at five-year follow-up

PURPOSE

This study reports the five-year functional outcomes from a prospective cohort study comparing robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) versus conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CO TKA).

METHODS

This prospective single-surgeon study included 120 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee arthritis undergoing primary TKA. This included 60 consecutive patients undergoing CO TKA followed by 60 consecutive patients undergoing RO TKA using a semi-automated robotic device. Study patients were reviewed at one, two, and five years after surgery and the following outcomes recorded: The University of California at Los Angeles activity-level (UCLA), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and any complications.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences between RO TKA and CO TKA in the median UCLA score (p = N.S), median KSS (p = N.S), and median OKS (p = N.S) at five-year follow-up. RO-TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS at one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.003), and five (p = 0.025) years of follow-up compared with CO TKA. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia between the two treatment groups (p = N.S).

CONCLUSION

Patients in both treatment groups had excellent functional outcomes with comparable patient reported outcomes at five-year follow-up. RO TKA was associated with statistically significant improvements in the FJS compared with CO TKA, but these differences did not reach the minimal clinically important difference at any follow-up interval. There was no overall difference in complications between the two treatment groups at five-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Prospective cohort study).

Unrestricted kinematic alignment corrects fixed flexion contracture in robotically aligned total knees without raising the joint line in extension

PURPOSE

Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (MA TKA) typically addresses fixed flexion contractures (FFC) by raising the joint line during extension. However, in unrestricted Kinematically Aligned TKA (KA TKA) utilizing a caliper-based resection technique, the joint line is not raised. This study aims to determine the efficacy of KA TKA in restoring full extension in patients with FFC without increasing distal femoral resection, considering tibial bone resection and sagittal component positioning.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted by a single surgeon, involving patients who underwent primary robotically assisted cruciate retaining unrestricted KA TKA between June 1, 2021, and December 1, 2022. Complete intraoperative resection and alignment data were recorded, including the thickness of distal femoral and proximal tibial bone cuts. Patients with a preoperative FFC ≥ 5° (study group) were compared to those with FFC < 5° (control group). The impact of variations in tibial resection and sagittal component positioning was assessed by comparing the heights of medial and lateral resections, sagittal femoral component flexion, and tibial slope. Group comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 48 KA TKA procedures met the inclusion criteria, with 24 performed on women. The mean preoperative FFC in the study group was 11.2° (range: 5-25°), while the control group exhibited 1° (range: 0-4°) (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences observed between the study and control groups in terms of distal femoral resections, both medially (p = 0.14) and laterally (p = 0.23), as well as tibial resection heights, both medially (p = 0.66) and laterally (p = 0.74). The alignment of the femoral component flexion and tibial slope was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.31 and p = 0.54, respectively). All patients achieved within 5 degrees of full extension at closure.

CONCLUSION

Robotic arm-assisted unrestricted KA TKA effectively restores full extension without raising the joint line during extension for patients with a preoperative fixed flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Referencing the center of the femoral head during robotic or computer-navigated primary total knee arthroplasty results in less femoral component flexion than the traditional intramedullary axis

BACKGROUND

During robotic and computer-navigated primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the center of the femoral head is utilized as the proximal reference point for femoral component position rather than the intramedullary axis. We sought to analyze the effect on femoral component flexion-extension position between these two reference points.

METHODS

We obtained CT 3D-reconstructions of 50 cadaveric intact femurs. We defined the navigation axis as the line from center of the femoral head to center of the knee (lowest point of the trochlear groove) and the intramedullary axis as the line from center of the knee to center of the canal at the isthmus. Differences between these axes in the sagittal plane were measured. Degree of femoral bow and femoral neck anteversion were correlated with the differences between the two femoral axes.

RESULTS

On average, the navigated axis was 1.4° (range, -1.4° to 4.1°) posterior to the intramedullary axis. As such, the femoral component would have on average 1.4° less flexion compared with techniques referencing the intramedullary canal. A more anterior intramedullary compared with navigated axis (i.e., less femoral flexion) was associated with more femoral bow (R2 = 0.7, P < 0.001) and less femoral neck anteversion (R2 = 0.5, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Computer-navigated or robotic TKA in which the center of the femoral head is utilized as a reference point, results in 1.4° less femoral component flexion than would be achieved by referencing the intramedullary canal. Surgeons should be aware of these differences as they may ultimately influence knee kinematics.

Patellar resurfacing versus retention in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Aims

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed.

Results

There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA.

Conclusion

Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this.

Fixed Flexion Contracture Can Successfully Be Addressed with Exact Preservation of the Femoral Joint Line and Only Minimal Increase of Tibia Resection in the Concept of Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing kinematic alignment (KA) robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with and without preoperative fixed flexion contracture (FFC) and address whether additional resection of the proximal tibia is required to address FFC. A retrospective review from 147 consecutive patients who received an RA-TKA with KA and a minimum one-year follow-up was performed. Preop and postop clinical and surgical data were collected. Groups were set based on preoperative extension deficits: group 1 (0-4°) (n = 64), group 2 (5-10°) (n = 64) and group 3 (>11°) (n = 27). There were no differences in patient demographics among the three groups. In group 3, the mean tibia resection was 0.85 mm thicker than group 1 (p < 0.05) and the preoperative extension deficit was improved from -17.22° (SD 3.49) preop to -2.41° (SD 4.47) postop (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that FFC can successfully be addressed in the RA-TKA with KA and rKA and that no additional femoral bone resection is needed to achieve full extension in patients with preoperative FFC when compared with patients without FFC. Only a slight increase in the amount of tibial resection was observed, but this was less than one millimetre.

Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Alignment goals in total knee replacement (TKR) is a topical subject. This study compares the short-term functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of two philosophies for knee arthroplasty alignment: measured resection (MR) and an individualised alignment philosophy, with the tibia mechanically aligned and an instrumented gap balancer (GB) to align the femur in both flexion and extension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

94 knees were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial. The surgical protocol used a MR technique for mechanical alignment or a GB technique for individualised alignment. Primary outcome was quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes included validated functional tests and PROMs as well as patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in the change from baseline mean quadriceps peak torque between the two groups (p = 0.988). Significant improvement in the change in range of motion (ROM) in the GB group compared to the MR group at 3 months (13° vs 6° p = 0.028) but this improvement was not significant at 1 year (20° vs 17° p = 0.21). The functional test of balance showed statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks (p = 0.03) in the GB group but this difference was not maintained. PROMs favoured the GB group, with the KOOS pain scoring statistically better (p ≤ 0.05) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualised alignment philosophy utilising a GB technique did not demonstrate an improvement in the primary outcome measure quadriceps peak torque. Improvement was seen in the GB group in PROM pain scores that was significant, both statistically and clinically, out to at least 1 year. Gains that were seen in functional assessment with GB, although significant at some time points, were no longer significant at 1 year and no difference was seen in quads strength. Compared to a MR technique, the individualised GB technique appears to confer some improvement in pain, ROM and some functional tests following TKR in the short-term.

Novel Arthrometer for Quantifying In Vivo Knee Laxity in Three Planes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Knee instability is a leading cause of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Instability can involve abnormal laxity in multiple directions including varus-valgus (VV) angulation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and internal-external rotation (IER). No existing arthrometer objectively quantifies knee laxity in all three of these directions. The study objectives were to verify the safety and assess reliability of a novel multiplanar arthrometer.

METHODS

The arthrometer utilized a five degree-of-freedom instrumented linkage. Two examiners each conducted two tests on the leg that had received a TKA of 20 patients (mean age 65 years (range, 53-75); 9 men, 11 women), with nine and eleven distinct patients tested at 3-month and 1-year postoperative time points, respectively. AP forces from -10 to 30 Newtons, VV moments of ±3 Newton-meters, and IER moments of ±2.5 Newton-meters were applied to each subject's replaced knee. Severity and location of knee pain during testing were assessed using a visual analog scale. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities were characterized using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

All subjects successfully completed testing. Pain during testing averaged 0.7 (out of possible 10; range, 0-2.5). Intraexaminer reliability was >0.77 for all loading directions and examiners. Interexaminer reliability and 95% confidence intervals were 0.85 (0.66-0.94), 0.67 (0.35-0.85), and 0.54 (0.16-0.79) in the VV, IER, and AP directions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The novel arthrometer was safe for evaluating AP, VV, and IER laxities in subjects who had received TKA. This device could be used to examine relationships between laxity and patient perceptions of knee instability.

Additional Distal Femoral Resection Minimally Improves Terminal Knee Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Challenging the Dogma

Background

Additional distal femoral resection is a common technique to address a flexion contracture during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but can lead to midflexion instability and patella baja. Prior reports regarding the magnitude of knee extension obtained with additional femoral resection have varied. This study sought to systematically review research describing the effect of femoral resection on knee extension and to perform meta-regression to estimate this relationship.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases by combining the terms ("flexion contracture" OR "flexion deformity") AND ("knee arthroplasty" OR "knee replacement") to identify 481 abstracts. In total, 7 articles reporting change in knee extension after additional femoral resection or augmentation across 184 knees were included. The mean value for knee extension, its standard deviation, and the number of knees tested were recorded for each level. Meta-regression was performed using weighted mixed-effects linear regression.

Results

Meta-regression estimated that each 1mm resected from the joint line produced a 2.5° gain of extension (95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.2). Sensitivity analyses excluding outlying observations estimated each 1mm resected from the joint line produced a 2.0° gain of extension (95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 2.2).

Conclusions

Each millimeter of additional femoral resection is likely to produce only a 2° improvement in knee extension. Thus, an additional resection of 2 mm is likely to improve knee extension by less than 5°. Alternative techniques, including posterior capsular release and posterior osteophyte resection, should be considered in correcting a flexion contracture during TKA.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for flexion instability : a concise follow-up of a previous report

AIMS

We have previously reported the mid-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for flexion instability. At a mean of four years, there were no re-revisions for instability. The aim of this study was to report the implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of the same cohort of of patients at a mean follow-up of ten years.

METHODS

The original publication included 60 revision TKAs in 60 patients which were undertaken between 2000 and 2010. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 65 years, and 33 (55%) were female. Since that time, 21 patients died, leaving 39 patients (65%) available for analysis. The cumulative incidence of any re-revision with death as a competing risk was calculated. Knee Society Scores (KSSs) were also recorded, and updated radiographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of any re-revision was 13% at a mean of ten years. At the most recent-follow-up, eight TKAs had been re-revised: three for recurrent flexion instability (two fully revised to varus-valgus constrained implants (VVCs), and one posterior-stabilized (PS) implant converted to VVC, one for global instability (PS to VVC), two for aseptic loosening of the femoral component, and two for periprosthetic joint infection). The ten-year cumulative incidence of any re-revision for instability was 7%. The median KSS improved significantly from 45 (interquartile range (IQR) 40 to 50) preoperatively to 70 (IQR 45 to 80) at a mean follow-up of ten years (p = 0.031). Radiologically, two patients, who had not undergone revision, had evidence of loosening (one tibial and one patellar). The remaining components were well fixed.

CONCLUSION

We found fair functional outcomes and implant survivorship at a mean of ten years after revision TKA for flexion instability with a PS implant. Recurrent instability and aseptic loosening were the most common indications for re-revision. Components with increased constraint, such as a VVC or hinged, should be used in these patients in order to reduce the risk of recurrent instability.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1126-1131.

Restricted kinematic alignment achieves similar relative lateral laxity and greater joint line obliquity compared to gap balancing TKA

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare ligament balance and laxity profiles achieved throughout flexion in restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) and gap balancing (GB). rKA and GB both aim to improve soft tissue balance and reduce ligament releases in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One surgeon performed 68 rKA, another performed 73 GB TKAs using the same CR implant and robotic system. rKA limited femoral valgus and tibial varus to 6°, with tibial recuts performed to achieve balance. GB limited tibial varus and femoral valgus to 2°, with femoral resections adjusted to achieve mediolateral balance throughout flexion using predictive-gap planning software. Final joint laxity was measured using a robotic ligament tensioner. Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in mediolateral balance and joint laxity throughout flexion. Further analyses compared alignment, joint line elevation and orientation (JLO), and frequency of ligament releases and bone recuts.

RESULTS

Both techniques reported greater lateral laxity throughout flexion, with GB reporting improved mediolateral balance from 10° to 45° flexion. GB resected 1.7 mm more distal femur (p ≤ 0.001) and had greater overall laxity than rKA throughout flexion (p ≤ 0.01). rKA increased JLO by 2.5° and 3° on the femur and tibia (p ≤ 0.001). Pre-operative and post-operative coronal alignment were similar across both techniques. rKA had a higher tibial recut rate: 26.5% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

rKA and GB both report lateral laxity but with different JLO and elevation. Use of a predictive-gap GB workflow resulted in greater mediolateral gap symmetry with fewer recuts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Similar outcomes to primary total knee arthroplasty achievable for aseptic revision using the same primary posterior-stabilised prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 49 months

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between primary and aseptic revision TKAs using the same posterior-stabilised (PS) prosthesis. The authors hypothesised similar outcomes between both groups for selected patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, case-control study assessed 36 patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA compared to a match group of 72 primary TKA. Both groups had the same PS design implant (ANATOMIC®, Amplitude, Valence, France). The International Knee Society (IKS) score, radiological outcomes (postoperative alignment, patellar tilt and radiolucent lines), re-intervention and revision rate were compared between the two groups with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 29 patients and 63 patients respectively in the revision and primary group, with a mean follow-up of 49.1 months (range 36.1-69). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in IKS scores between the two groups [169.8 for the revision group and 179.6 for the primary group (p = 0.09)]. No statistical difference was observed for post-operative satisfaction 86.2% versus 92.1% (p = 0.46). Between the two groups, there was no difference in mean radiological assessment, including radiolucent lines (p = 0.7). There was no significant difference for overall implant survivorship 96.5% versus 100% (p = 0.13) at 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Similar clinical, radiological and survivorship outcomes were found between rTKA and primary TKA groups using the same PS level of constraint in patients undergoing revision surgery for aseptic indications at 3-year follow-up. Use of PS implants in rTKA for the correct indication suggests this to be a safe approach at least in the medium term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case-control study.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis Underestimates Slope Compared to Traditional Intramedullary Axis

BACKGROUND

Tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) impacts knee flexion, balance, and ligament strain. Implants were initially designed with tibial slope recommendations based on the intramedullary axis. However, technology-assisted TKA, such as robotics or navigation, determines slope from the ankle-knee axis connecting the center of the transmalleolar line to the proximal exit point of the tibial shaft axis. We sought to quantify the difference in tibial slope between the traditional intramedullary and transmalleolar sagittal tibial axes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 40 TKAs with preoperative computed tomography scans. We reconstructed the 3-dimensional geometry of the tibia and fibula and determined the intramedullary axis as the best fit cylinder to the tibial shaft. We defined the transmalleolar axis according to accepted industry standards. We measured the angular difference between both axes in the sagittal plane.

RESULTS

The transmalleolar axis was radiographically posterior to the intramedullary axis in 39 knees. Utilizing the transmalleolar axis to set posterior tibial slope would reduce the posterior tibial slope by a mean of 1.9° ± 1.3° compared to the intramedullary axis. Furthermore, the posterior slope would be reduced between 0° and 2° in 24 knees (60%), between 2° and 4° in 10 knees (25%), and more than 4° in 5 knees (13%).

CONCLUSION

Tibial components implanted with technology assistance referencing the transmalleolar axis to set posterior slope will show an average of 1.9° less posterior slope when measured in sagittal plain radiographs, potentially concerning for knee kinematics.

A Mid-Level Constrained Insert Reduces Coupled Axial Rotation but Not Coronal Mid-Flexion Laxity Induced by Joint Line Elevation in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Computational Study

BACKGROUND

Surgeons may resect additional distal femur during primary posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture. However, the resultant joint line elevation (JLE) increases mid-flexion laxity. We determined whether a mid-level constraint (MLC) insert reduced mid-flexion laxity after JLE.

METHODS

Six computational knee models were developed using computed tomography scans and average soft tissue properties yielding balanced extension gaps but with a 10° flexion contracture. Distal femoral resections of +2 and +4 mm were simulated with PS and MLC inserts. Varus-valgus ±10 Nm moments were applied at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus-valgus angulation) and coupled axial rotation (the sum of internal/external rotation) were measured and compared between insert models.

RESULTS

At 30° of flexion, coronal laxities with the PS insert at the +2 and +4 mm resections averaged 7.9° ± 0.6° and 11.3° ± 0.6°, respectively, and decreased by 0.8° (P = .06) and 1.0° (P = .07), respectively, with the MLC insert. PS rotational laxities at the +2 and +4 mm resections averaged 11.1° ± 3.9° and 12.5° ± 4.6°, respectively, and decreased by 5.6° (P = .01) and 7.1° (P = .02), respectively, with the MLC insert. Similar patterns were observed at 45° and 60° of flexion.

CONCLUSION

With additional distal femoral resections to alleviate a flexion contracture, utilizing an MLC insert substantially reduced coupled axial rotation but had a minimal impact on coronal laxity compared to a PS insert. Efforts should be taken to avoid JLE in primary total knee arthroplasty as even MLC inserts may not mitigate coronal laxity.