HYDROXYAPATITE IN REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS WITH MASSIVE ACETABULAR DEFECTS

Alternating Layers of Morselized Allograft and Injectable Ceramic Bone Graft Substitute in Acetabular Reconstruction: A Novel 'Sandwich' Technique

BACKGROUND

Impaction of morselized allograft is an appealing procedure for addressing the bone defects. However, concerns remain about its suitability for massive defects. We used a novel "sandwich" technique by impacting the morselized allograft in layers with an intervening layer of injectable bone graft substitute for restoring bone defects during acetabular reconstruction in total hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

From August 2015 to June 2017, 17 revisions, 4 rerevisions, and 3 complex primary total hip arthroplasties were operated by this novel technique. Postoperatively, serial X-rays were evaluated at regular intervals. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed by the Harris hip score. To examine if introducing an injectable bone substitute into allograft stock increased its load-bearing capability, simulated mechanical testing using Synbone samples was conducted in the laboratory.

RESULTS

The mean Harris hip score significantly improved from 54.6 preoperatively to 86.8 at the latest follow-up. Graft incorporation was seen in all the cases. There was no evidence of component migration or loosening as compared to the X-rays at 3 weeks and 3 months in all the cases. With revision of component as end point, the survivorship was 100% at 82 months. The mechanical testing reported a higher capability of allograft samples when compared to those without bone substitutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirms that the use of the "sandwich" technique is a reliable option for major acetabular reconstruction. Early weight bearing is a significant value addition, and short-term results confirm good clinical and functional outcome. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess the status of the construct in the long term.

(Bio)manufactured Solutions for Treatment of Bone Defects with Emphasis on US-FDA Regulatory Science Perspective

Bone defects, with second highest demand for surgeries around the globe, may lead to serious health issues and negatively influence patient lives. The advances in biomedical engineering and sciences have led to the development of several creative solutions for bone defect treatment. This review provides a brief summary of bone graft materials, an organized overview of top-down and bottom-up (bio)manufacturing approaches, plus a critical comparison between advantages and limitations of each method. We specifically discuss additive manufacturing techniques and their operation mechanisms in detail. Next, we review the hybrid methods and promising future directions for bone grafting, while giving a comprehensive US-FDA regulatory science perspective, biocompatibility concepts and assessments, and clinical considerations to translate a technology from a research laboratory to the market. The topics covered in this review could potentially fuel future research efforts in bone tissue engineering, and perhaps could also provide novel insights for other tissue engineering applications.

Minimum 10 years clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revisions of total hip arthroplasties with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is the most frequent indication for revision of total hip arthroplasty. Revision arthroplasty of acetabular component is a challenge for every surgeon because they have to simultaneously deal with the reconstruction of bone defects, adequate implant geometry and stable fixation. Allografts are the most frequently used materials in reconstruction of bone loss during revision surgeries. Because of an increasing number of revision hip arthroplasties and poor availability of allografts, we decided to use bone graft substitutes in acetabular revisions.

METHODS

Between September 2005 and January 2010, 44 revision arthroplasties in 43 patients were performed with the use of bone graft substitutes for acetabular defect reconstruction in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone defects were classified according to Paprosky. Seventeen hips were classified as IIA, 3 hips IIB, 3 hips IIC, 10 hips IIIA and 11 hips IIIB. Acetabular bone defects were reconstructed with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute - BoneSave. Clinical and radiological examination was performed after 3 months, 1 year and then annually. Harris hip score was used for clinical evaluation. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method with aseptic loosening as the definition of endpoint.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period is 12 (range from 10 to 15) years. During the follow-up, three patients died after 24 months because of causes not related to surgery. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. The evaluation of clinical results revealed an increase in pre-operative HHS from average 38.3 (range 25 to 55) points to average 86.3 (range 45 to 95) points at the most recent follow-up. Radiographic evaluation showed the migration of one revision cage 12 months after surgery. Revision arthroplasty performed after 14 months revealed the partial incorporation of bone graft substitute. There were not any cases of loosening of revision acetabular cup at the most recent follow up examination in the remaining 39 patients. Bone graft substitute was not absorbed in all of these patients. The survival after 10 years amounted to 97.56%.

CONCLUSION

Bone graft substitute Bone Save may be suitable for acetabular revision surgery, however preoperative bone defect is critical for success and determining of a surgical technique, so this is multifactorial in this challenge surgery.

Mid-term result of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with hydroxyapatite impaction

The aim of this study is to investigate the mid-term results of 29 hips in 26 patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and impaction with hydroxyapatite (HA) granules. The acetabular bone defects were AAOS type II for six hips and type III for 23 hips. The mean Merle d’Aubigné clinical scores were significantly improved after operation. Six hips developed implant migration and breakage, and five of six hips were revised after an average of 5.5 (range 2.0–8.8) years. All hips with thickness of the grafted HA less than 10 mm were stable. As the HA became thicker, the failure rate were significantly increased. The Kaplan–Meier survival rates at 10 years were 73.2%, with 100% and 67.0% for AAOS type II and III defect respectively as the end point was failure condition. Reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and impaction with HA granules was an alternative method in the absence of adequate allografts.

Synthetic Bone Grafting in Aseptic Loosening of Acetabular Cup: Good Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Contained Bone Defects at Medium-Term Follow Up

Restoring bone loss is one of the major challenges when facing hip revision surgery. To eliminate the risk of disease transmission and antigenicity of allografts and donor-morbidity of autografts, the use of synthetic bioceramics has become popular in the last decade. Our study investigated the effectiveness of impaction bone grafting (IBG) of contained acetabular defects (Paprosky 2 and 3a) using a porous ceramic-based hydroxyapatite bone substitute (Engipore, provided by Finceramica Faenza S.p.A., Faenza, Italy) mixed with a low percentage of autologous bone (obtained from reaming when available). We retrospectively assessed 36 patients who underwent acetabular revision using IBG using a porous ceramic-based hydroxyapatite bone substitute with cementless implants with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. We evaluated, at regular intervals, patients clinically (using the Hip Harris Score and Oxford Score) and radiologically to evaluate the rate of incorporation of the graft, the presence of radiolucent lines or migrations of the cup. Clinical scores significantly improved (WOMAC improved from 49.7–67.30, and the HSS from 56–89). The rate of implants’ survival was 100% at our medium follow-up (4.4 years). We reported five cases of minor migration of the cup, and radiolucent lines were visible in seven patients at the last-follow up. The graft was well-incorporated in all patients. The results presented in this study suggest the HA bone substitute is an effective and safe bone graft when facing hip revision surgery; thus, longer follow-up studies are required.

11-Year Mean Follow-Up of Acetabular Impaction Grafting With a Mixture of Bone Graft and Hydroxyapatite Porous Synthetic Bone Substitute

BACKGROUND

We report an 11-year mean follow-up of the effectiveness of bone impaction grafting with bone and hydroxyapatite (HA) for large, uncontained acetabular defects in primary and revision hip surgeries.

METHODS

Over 5 years, 47 total hip arthroplasties with uncontained acetabular deficiencies were performed by augmentation using an impaction graft with 50:50 mixture of freeze-dried bone allograft and HA. Ten were primary total hip arthroplasties and 37 revision procedures. X-rays were taken postoperatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then annually to assess incorporation of the graft, radiolucent lines, resorption, or migration of components. Functional outcomes were assessed by annual pain and function parts of the Harris Hip Score.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 10 years, the survivorship was 100%. All patients were accounted for; 6 had died. The Harris Hip Score for pain improved from 9 and 17 (primaries and revisions, respectively) to 39 and 41. For function, there was an improvement from 20 and 19 to 32 (both groups). There were lucent lines in 8 cases, 3 cups had minor/stable migration, and one cup had significant migration (>15 mm). Graft incorporation had occurred in 20 hips.

CONCLUSION

This is the longest survivorship of bone impaction grafting with morcellised bone and HA substitute. Although 11-year survivorship, function and pain are excellent, radiological findings of lysis in 8 and migration in 4 cases may be of concern for the immediate future and will need close monitoring. Even in these cases, revision may be easier because of restoration of bone stock.

Grafting with hydroxyapatite granules for defects of acetabular bone at revision total hip replacement

The long-term results of grafting with hydroxyapatite granules for acetabular deficiency in revision total hip replacement are not well known. We have evaluated the results of revision using a modular cup with hydroxyapatite grafting for Paprosky type 2 and 3 acetabular defects at a minimum of ten years’ follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed 49 acetabular revisions at a mean of 135 months (120 to 178). There was one type 2B, ten 2C, 28 3A and ten 3B hips. With loosening as the endpoint, the survival rate was 74.2% (95% confidence interval 58.3 to 90.1). Radiologically, four of the type 3A hips (14%) and six of the type 3B hips (60%) showed aseptic loosening with collapse of the hydroxyapatite layer, whereas no loosening occurred in type 2 hips. There was consolidation of the hydroxyapatite layer in 33 hips (66%). Loosening was detected in nine of 29 hips (31%) without cement and in one of 20 hips (5%) with cement (p = 0.03, Fisher’s exact probability test). The linear wear and annual wear rate did not correlate with loosening.

These results suggest that the long-term results of hydroxyapatite grafting with cement for type 2 and 3A hips are encouraging.

Impaction grafting of the acetabulum with a mixture of frozen, ground irradiated bone graft and porous synthetic bone substitute (Apapore 60)

The clinical and radiological results of 50 consecutive acetabular reconstructions in 48 patients using impaction grafting have been retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 mixture of frozen, ground irradiated bone graft and Apapore 60, a synthetic bone graft substitute, was used in all cases. There were 13 complex primary and 37 revision procedures with a mean follow-up of five years (3.4 to 7.6). The clinical survival rate was 100%, with improvements in the mean Harris Hip Scores for pain and function. Radiologically, 30 acetabular grafts showed evidence of incorporation, ten had radiolucent lines and two acetabular components migrated initially before stabilising.

Acetabular reconstruction in both primary and revision surgery using a 1:1 mixture of frozen, ground, irriadiated bone and Apapore 60 appears to be a reliable method of managing acetabular defects. Longer follow-up will be required to establish whether this technique is as effective as using fresh-frozen allograft.

The role of impaction grafting: the when and how

The challenges of acetabular revision include bone loss and poor bone biology. Favorable 10-year reports exist of uncemented acetabular revision using hemispherical uncemented sockets. In the presence of bone stock deficiency, adjunctive morsellized impaction bone grafting is a recognized means of restoring bone stock. We attempt to restore bone stock with impaction grafting beneath a cementless cup for contained defects, defects that can be rendered contained, and whenever there is capacity for rim fixation. The technique of bone graft preparation is important. We use a mixture of bone milling and bone chips of various sizes. Morsellized allograft is inserted, packed, and/or reverse reamed into any defects. The reconstruction relies on the ability to gain biological fixation of the component to the underlying host bone. This requires intimate host bone contact and rigid implant stability. The fixation is therefore augmented with screws in all cases. It is important to achieve host bone contact in a least part of the dome and posterior column. When this is possible, and particularly when there is a good rim fit, we have not found it absolutely necessary to have contact with host bone over >50% of the surface. Stability of primary fixation is a better predictor of outcome than volume of graft or percentage of host bone contact. The advantages of bone grafting in acetabular reconstruction include the ability to restore bone stock, rebuild a normal hip center and hip biomechanics, and increase bone stock for future revisions.

Osteogenic protein-1 increases the fixation of implants grafted with morcellised bone allograft and ProOsteon bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs

Impacted bone allograft is often used in revision joint replacement. Hydroxyapatite granules have been suggested as a substitute or to enhance morcellised bone allograft. We hypothesised that adding osteogenic protein-1 to a composite of bone allograft and non-resorbable hydroxyapatite granules (ProOsteon) would improve the incorporation of bone and implant fixation. We also compared the response to using ProOsteon alone against bone allograft used in isolation. We implanted two non-weight-bearing hydroxyapatite-coated implants into each proximal humerus of six dogs, with each implant surrounded by a concentric 3 mm gap. These gaps were randomly allocated to four different procedures in each dog: 1) bone allograft used on its own; 2) ProOsteon used on its own; 3) allograft and ProOsteon used together; or 4) allograft and ProOsteon with the addition of osteogenic protein-1. After three weeks osteogenic protein-1 increased bone formation and the energy absorption of implants grafted with allograft and ProOsteon. A composite of allograft, ProOsteon and osteogenic protein-1 was comparable, but not superior to, allograft used on its own. ProOsteon alone cannot be recommended as a substitute for allograft around non-cemented implants, but should be used to extend the volume of the graft, preferably with the addition of a growth factor.

Repair of bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty by implantation of a new bone-inducing material comprised of recombinant human BMP-2, Beta-TCP powder, and a biodegradable polymer: an experimental study in dogs

A recombinant BMP-2-retaining putty-form implant in combination with a hip prosthesis was used to reconstruct a canine hip joint with defects similar to those encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The bone defects were made by resecting the medial half of the proximal femur and the superior acetabular bone with inner iliac wall perforation in 10 dogs. In five dogs, hip prostheses were implanted with the putty material consisting of a synthetic polymer (poly D,L-lactic acid-polyethylene glycol block copolymer), beta-tricalcium phosphate powder, and recombinant human BMP-2 in each defect (BMP/Polymer/TCP group). In the remaining five dogs, the same material without rhBMP-2 (control group) was implanted. In the BMP/Polymer/TCP group, new radiopaque shadows began to appear 4 weeks after surgery at the defects around the hip prostheses on both the femoral and acetabular sides. At 12 weeks, the defects were completely filled with new bone in contact with the prosthesis. On histology, the rhBMP-2/Polymer/beta-TCP composite putty implants had been completely resorbed and replaced by new bone. Repair of the bone defects was not seen in the control group. The ability of this material to restore bone effectively eliminates the dependency on bone grafts of autogeneic or allogeneic origin for revision hip arthroplasty and thus opens up a potential new treatment approach in hip cases requiring this type of surgery.

No negative effects of bone impaction grafting with bone and ceramic mixtures

Reconstructing large loaded bone defects with ceramic bone graft extenders is tempting considering the expected future donor bone shortage. However, whether there are negative effects is unknown. Standardized large defects in the acetabulum of goats were created and subsequently reconstructed with metal mesh and impacted morselized cancellous bone grafts or a 50/50% volume mixture of tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules and morselized cancellous bone grafts using the bone impaction grafting technique. Subsequently, a cemented total hip prosthesis was inserted. Clinically, no differences were observed between groups. Most of the morselized cancellous bone graft had been resorbed and incorporated into new bone after 15 weeks. The large tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules were integrated, the smaller crushed tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite granules were surrounded by osteoclasts or engulfed by macrophages and giant cells. The cement penetration into the reconstructive layer and the quality of the bone based on a semiquantitative score were similar in both groups. We found no suggestion of tricalcium-hydroxyapatite granule-induced third-body wear in this short-term followup study. No negative effects were observed in this study, and therefore, it seems reasonable to use tricalcium-hydroxyapatite granules in a 50/50% volume mix with morselized cancellous bone graft as a bone graft extender in acetabular revision surgery with the bone impaction grafting technique.

Bone formation using novel interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic hybridized with cultured marrow stromal stem cells derived from Green rat

The clinical use of cultured marrow stromal stem cells (MSCs) has recently attracted attention in the field of tissue engineering. For the clinical use of the MSCs, a prominent scaffold is needed. A scaffold hybridized with MSCs is transformed into a "bioactive bone substitute," and this provides good osteoconduction. In this study, a novel calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic with an interconnected porous structure (IP-CHA) was used as a scaffold. MSCs were harvested from Green rats containing Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), and then these hybrids were implanted into the tibias of Sprague-Dawley rats. The purposes of this study were to examine the osteogenic ability of these hybrids without coculture, and to evaluate whether the resulting bone formation originated from the grafted MSCs or the recipient's cells. The hybridized group showed excellent bone formation compared with the IP-CHA-only implant group. Observation of the implanted MSCs revealed that they survived 8 weeks after surgery, and differentiated into osteoblast-like cells, thus providing bone formation. This implantation of the MSCs/IP-CHA composite provides excellent osteoconduction, and is expected to have extensive clinical applications.