Total elbow replacement for the management of the ankylosed or fused elbow

Treatment of post-traumatic complete bony ankylosed elbow using total arthroplasty and hernia patch - A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

The elbow is one of the most mobile joints, and its movement is very important. Bony ankylosed elbow is an uncommon condition leading to complete loss of activity of elbow, and then lead to severe disability and limitation in activities of daily living.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old woman sustained comminuted fracture of left distal humerus. She underwent open reduction and internal fixation by plates. After the plates were removed in 2016，stiffness developed.The elbow was stable but fixed at 90°，there was no vascular injury or deficit in sensory and motor function of the ulnar nerve. She hopes to eliminate pain and restore normal mobility compatible with ADL.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Complete bony ankylosis of the elbow joint may be caused by trauma, rheumatic disease, burns, congenital stiffness and other conditions. Even with the compensation of shoulder and wrist, it will still have a great impact on upper limb function. Whether to treat mainly depends on whether the patient has the require to improve the functionality and return to daily activities. Treatment methods are very limited, including interposition arthroplasty and TEA. Defect of soft tissue appeared was seen in our case, Hernia Patch was innovatively applied to reconstruct the defect of soft tissue and maintain continuity of elbow extension mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Patients with post-traumatic elbow joint ankylosis were suffered from severe bony abnormalities, but also soft tissue contracture or defects due to multiple operations and trauma. We present a case of complete bony ankylosed elbow treated with total elbow arthroplasty and Hernia Patch.

Outcome of unlinked total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in patients younger than 50 years old

AIMS

There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal.

RESULTS

The mean MEPS significantly improved from 47 (15 to 70) points preoperatively to 95 (70 to 100) points at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications were noted in six elbows (23%) in six patients, and of these, four with an ulnar neuropathy and one elbow with postoperative traumatic fracture required additional surgeries. There was no revision with implant removal, and there was no radiological evidence of loosening around the components. With any revision surgery as the endpoint, the survival rates up to 25 years were 78.1% (95% confidence interval 52.8 to 90.6) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcome of primary unlinked TEA for young patients with RA was satisfactory and comparable with that for elderly patients. A favourable survival rate without implant removal might support the use of unlinked devices for young patients with this disease entity, with a caution of a relatively high complication rate regarding ulnar neuropathy.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IVCite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):19-26.

Conversion of Elbow Arthrodesis to Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review

Elbow arthrodesis is a salvage operation designed to relieve pain and enable weight bearing in young patients with painful arthritic joints who have failed all other treatment modalities. Unfortunately, elbow arthrodesis is poorly tolerated by many patients because there is no fusion position that accommodates all activities of daily living. As indications for elbow arthroplasty expand and implant design improves, patients living with elbow arthrodesis may seek conversion to arthroplasty to regain a functional range of motion. Only one case of elbow arthrodesis to elbow arthroplasty conversion has been reported in the English literature to date. We present the case of a 58 year old male, five years status post elbow arthrodesis, unable to perform his ADLs adequately, who was successfully converted to a total elbow arthroplasty. Indications, contraindications, and technical pearls are discussed.

Triceps Insufficiency After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of triceps insufficiency after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) varies in the literature, and a consensus on treatment strategy is lacking. We review the incidence, the risk factors, the clinical presentation, and the diagnosis and treatment of triceps insufficiency after TEA. Based on this information, we have formulated recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2020 to identify studies that investigated triceps function following TEA by searching the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Eligible studies (1) reported on triceps function following primary or revision TEA for every indication, regardless of technique (e.g., bone grafts), (2) included ≥6 adult patients, (3) had the full-text article available, and (4) had a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

RESULTS

Eighty studies with a total of 4,825 TEAs were included. The quality was low in 15 studies, moderate in 64 studies, and high in 1 study. The mean incidence of triceps insufficiency was 4.5%. The rates were highest in patients after revision TEA (22%), in those with posttraumatic arthritis as an indication for surgery (10.2%), and after a triceps-reflecting approach (4.9%). Most studies used the Medical Research Council scale to score triceps function, although cutoff points and the definition of triceps insufficiency differed among studies. Surgical treatment showed favorable results with anconeus tendon transfer and Achilles allograft repair when compared with direct repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of triceps insufficiency varies greatly, probably due to a lack of consensus on the definition of the term. Therefore, we recommend the guidelines for clinical practice that are presented in this article. These guidelines assist clinicians in providing the best possible treatment strategy for their patients and help researchers optimize their future study designs in order to compare outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Osteosynthesis of fractures after elbow ankylosis treated with an Ilizarov external ring fixator: A case report

Treatment with an Ilizarov ring external fixator is less invasive of soft tissues than is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgery. Operative treatment of fractures with an Ilizarov ring external fixator after elbow ankylosis has not been reported. We describe our experience with this surgical treatment (i.e., placement of an Ilizarov external ring fixator) for a fracture that occurred after elbow ankylosis. A 63-year-old Japanese woman fell from standing height onto her left elbow. A transverse fracture was observed at the ankylosed site and the patient underwent surgery 8 days after the injury. The surgery was performed in the prone position under general anesthesia. Four months postoperatively, the fracture showed bone union and the fixator was removed. At the 1-year follow-up, she had no pain and no nerve palsy, can could perform the same activities as before the injury. Thus, treatment with an Ilizarov ring external fixator for a fracture around the elbow joint is a minimally invasive procedure that affords firm fixation and achieves fracture-site compression. Osteosynthesis of fractures after elbow ankylosis treated with an Ilizarov external ring fixator has not been reported previously. This technique was less invasive to the soft tissues and was considered to be a good surgical treatment to achieve osteosynthesis of fractures after elbow ankylosis.

Outcomes following total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus post-traumatic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) undertaken for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with TEA performed for post-traumatic conditions with regard to implant failure, functional outcome, and perioperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We completed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nine cohort studies investigated the outcome of TEA between RA and post-traumatic conditions. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)) guidelines and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were applied to assess the quality of the included studies. We assessed three major outcome domains: implant failures (including aseptic loosening, septic loosening, bushing wear, axle failure, component disassembly, or component fracture); functional outcomes (including arc of range of movement, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire), and perioperative complications (including deep infection, intraoperative fracture, postoperative fracture, and ulnar neuropathy).

RESULTS

This study included a total of 679 TEAs for RA (n = 482) or post-traumatic conditions (n = 197). After exclusion, all of the TEAs included in this meta-analysis were cemented with linked components. Our analysis demonstrated that the RA group was associated with a higher risk of septic loosening after TEA (odds ratio (OR) 3.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 14.12), while there was an increased risk of bushing wear, axle failure, component disassembly, or component fracture in the post-traumatic group (OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.37 to 9.35). A higher MEPS (standardized mean difference 0.634, 95% CI 0.379 to 0.890) was found in the RA group. There were no significant differences in arc of range of movement, DASH questionnaire, and risk of aseptic loosening, deep infection, perioperative fracture, or ulnar neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The aetiology of TEA surgery appears to have an impact on the outcome in terms of specific modes of implant failures. RA patients might have a better functional outcome after TEA surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1489-1497.

Treatment of complete ankylosed elbow with total arthroplasty

We reported the case of a 38-year-old patient who in 2017 presented to our institution after post-traumatic complete ankylosis of the elbow. He complained of stiffness and pain, and the radiographs revealed complete fusion of the humeroulnar joint. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) on admission was 31, and the elbow was fused at 90° flexed position. The patient underwent semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty with Bryan-Morrey approach; after a 2.1 years follow-up, active arc of movement was 120°. The MEPS was excellent with a 100 points score, the patient was able to complete all activities of daily living. We did not report any complications. Total elbow arthroplasty has shown to be a good therapeutic option that make it possible to restore adequate functional range of motion and relieve pain in young patients with post-traumatic stiffness/arthritis of the elbow.

Megaprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus: still a challenge in limb salvage

BACKGROUND

The distal humerus is a rare location of bone tumors. Because of the complexity of the elbow joint, poor soft-tissue coverage, and proximity of nerves and vessels, resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction are demanding.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the clinical results after distal humeral resection and megaprosthetic reconstruction in 12 patients with an average age of 46 years. All patient files were reviewed for clinical information, and postoperative function and patients' contentment were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.

RESULTS

The predominant diagnoses were bone and soft-tissue sarcoma (n = 6), giant cell tumor (n = 2), and renal cell carcinoma metastasis (n = 2). Local recurrence was the reason for secondary amputation in all cases (n = 3). The prosthetic survival rate after surgery was 82% at 2 years and 64% at 5 years. Reconstruction failure was mainly caused by aseptic loosening of the humeral stem, occurring in 27% (n = 3), followed by aseptic loosening of the ulnar stem in 9% (n = 1) and periprosthetic infection in 9% (n = 1). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24 points (range, 20-30 points). An extension lag of more than 10° was noted in 6 patients (55%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that limb salvage with a distal humeral replacement can achieve good functional results in most patients, although the complication rate with special emphasis on the loosening rate of the humeral stem is high. However, limb salvage was not achieved in 27% of patients because of local recurrence.

Heterotopic ossification after total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication that can arise after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In most cases, it is asymptomatic; however, in some patients, it can limit range of motion and lead to poor outcomes. The objective of this review was to assess and report the incidence, risk factors, prophylaxis, and management of HO after TEA.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating the occurrence of HO after TEA. The search was performed in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all included studies was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1907 studies were retrieved, of which 45 were included involving 2256 TEA patients. HO was radiographically present in 10% of patients and was symptomatic in 3%. Fewer than 1% of patients went on to undergo surgical excision of HO, with outcomes after surgery reported as good or excellent as assessed by range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. HO appears more likely to develop in patients undergoing TEA because of ankylosis, primary osteoarthritis, and distal humeral fractures. Surgical intervention is more likely to be required in patients in whom HO develops after TEA performed for ankylosis and post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

HO is an uncommon complication after TEA, with most patients in whom HO develops being asymptomatic and requiring no surgical management. Routine HO prophylaxis for TEA is not supported by the literature. The effectiveness of prophylaxis in high-risk patients is uncertain, and future studies are required to clarify its usefulness.

Post-traumatic stiff elbow

Post-traumatic and post-operative stiffness of the elbow joint is relatively common and may in pronounced cases markedly interfere with normal upper extremity function.Soft-tissue contractures and heterotopic bone formation are two major causes of limited movement.Extensive recent research has elucidated many of the pathways contributing to these conditions, but the exact mechanisms are still unknown.In the early phase of soft-tissue contractures conservative treatment may be valuable, but in longstanding cases operative treatment is often necessary.Several different options are available depending on the severity of the condition and the underlying offending structures. Surgical treatment may allow significant gains in movement but rarely complete restoration, and complications are not uncommon.The following presentation reviews the recent literature on pathomechanisms and treatment alternatives. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170062.

Total elbow arthroplasty under unfavourable soft tissue conditions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and soft tissue reconstruction.

METHODS

We investigated six patients who underwent TEA and soft tissue reconstruction (two elbows with 1-stage surgery and four elbows with 2-stage surgery). The mean patient age at the time of the surgical procedure was 43.2 years; the mean follow-up duration was 88.2 months.

RESULTS

The mean pain visual analogue scale (VAS) during motion was improved from 6.3 pre-operatively to 0.7 at the last follow-up. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) improved from 26.7 pre-operatively to 81.7 at the last follow-up. The mean flexion-extension arcs of the 1- and 2-stage surgery groups increased from 12.5° and 13.8° pre-operatively to 72.5° and 100° at the last follow-up, respectively. The mean MEPS of the one and two stage surgery groups were 75 and 85, respectively, at the last follow-up. One of the six elbows had loosening on the simple radiograph at the last follow-up, and there were no cases with bushing wear. Three elbows needed additional skin debridement owing to wound complications (2/2 elbows in the 1-stage surgery group and 1/4 elbows in the 2-stage surgery group).

CONCLUSIONS

Under unfavorable soft tissue conditions, performing soft tissue reconstruction with TEA provides satisfactory functional improvement and pain relief. The two stage surgery provided a lower rate of wound complication and better elbow function than the one stage surgery, which led to high patient satisfaction post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Discovery Elbow System: clinical and radiological results after 2- to 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Discovery Elbow System (DES) is a semi-constrained prosthesis, mainly used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Records from 79 patients with RA (90 DES arthroplasties) were reviewed; 47 patients with 55 DES elbows were re-examined. Range of motion (ROM) of both elbows, upper limb function, and quality of life (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS], and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey [RAND-36]) were assessed. Cementing quality was assessed, and radiolucent lines measured from plain radiographs. Mean follow-up was 64 (range 24-123) months.

RESULTS

Pre-operatively to post-operatively, mean elbow flexion improved from 120° to 146° (p < 0.001) and mean extension lag improved from 29° to 24° (p = 0.02), respectively. At follow-up, mean supination was 66°, mean pronation was 69°, and mean grip strength was 14 kg. Grip strength and ROM (except supination) were similar between the DES elbow and contralateral un-operated elbow. Mean post-operative MEPS was 93 points (excellent, n = 38; good, n = 14; fair, n = 2; and poor, n = 1). Mean DASH score was 43 points. The RAND-36 showed that physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health were lower than the Finnish reference values. Primary cementing was challenging, and radiolucent lines appeared during follow-up. Four prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening (n = 3) and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

DES provides significant improvement in patient's flexion-extension arc. Cementing of the elbow prosthesis was challenging; radiolucent lines appeared during the 5-year follow-up, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. First-generation locking screws may loosen over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

[Post-traumatic arthritis in the young patient : Treatment options before the endoprosthesis]

BACKGROUND

In the young patient, treatment of post-traumatic elbow arthritis remains difficult. Total elbow arthroplasty must be delayed for as long as possible. Therapy starts with nonoperative treatment. If this fails, operative options can be discussed.

TREATMENT AIM

The aim of surgery is to provide a functional range of motion with acceptable pain without obstructing future treatment options.

THERAPY

Patients with pain at terminal extension and/or flexion may benefit from arthroscopic or open debridement. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis and pain throughout the complete range of motion, who are too young for total elbow arthroplasty, are offered interposition arthroplasty or arthrodesis. Arthrodesis of the elbow leads to significant restrictions in daily life due to the complete loss of extension/flexion. Therefore, arthrodesis is only offered as treatment in exceptional circumstances. Interposition arthroplasty is a reasonable option for the young patient without significant bony defects, which may provide a stable, functional flexion arc with an acceptable pain level. Interposition arthroplasty preserves the revision options of re-interposition arthroplasty as well as the withdrawal to total elbow arthroplasty. Partial and total elbow arthroplasty are treatment options of elbow arthritis but are not subjects of this article.

The posttraumatic stiff elbow: an update

Posttraumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging to treat despite improvement of our understanding of the pathogenesis of posttraumatic contractures and new treatment regimens. This review provides an update and overview of the etiology of posttraumatic elbow stiffness, its classification, evaluation, nonoperative and operative treatment, and postoperative management.

Clinical Outcomes of Semiconstrained Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Who Were Forty Years of Age or Younger

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty is not commonly used in young patients with advanced arthritis because of concerns regarding implant loosening and clinical failure. Until now, to our knowledge, there have only been a few studies on the outcome in younger patients undergoing total elbow arthroplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-three elbows in patients forty years of age or younger who underwent total elbow arthroplasty were reviewed retrospectively. There were nine elbows with posttraumatic arthritis and fourteen elbows with nontraumatic arthritis. The mean patient age at the time of the surgical procedure was thirty-three years (range, twenty to forty years), and the mean follow-up duration was 129 months (range, eighty-five to 227 months).

RESULTS

At the time of the latest follow-up, pain during motion decreased from a mean visual analog scale score (and standard deviation) of 5.8 ± 1.8 cm preoperatively to 1.6 ± 1.1 cm postoperatively (p < 0.001), and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score increased from 32.0 ± 9.4 points preoperatively to 81.1 ± 13.7 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean subjective patients' satisfaction score was 83.5 ± 11.7 points. The mean flexion-extension arc in the posttraumatic arthritis group increased from 37.8° ± 30.3° preoperatively to 120.6° ± 11.3° at the time of the latest follow-up, whereas that in the nontraumatic arthritis group increased from 24.3° ± 27.6° to 96.4° ± 21.2° (p < 0.001 for both). At the time of the latest follow-up, the loosening rate was 13% and mild-to-moderate bushing wear was observed in four elbows (17%). A revision surgical procedure was performed in five elbows (22%), of which three had revision surgery after fifteen postoperative years. The overall implant survival rates were 95% at the eight-year follow-up and 89% at the fifteen-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite concerns regarding the longevity of total elbow replacements in young patients, long-term follow-up after total elbow arthroplasty showed significant functional improvement and pain relief. Although a desirable range of motion after the surgical procedure was difficult to achieve in patients with preoperative ankylosis, total elbow arthroplasty in selected young patients showed acceptable loosening, reoperation, and implant survival rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Limited extension after linked total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has become an established procedure to relieve pain and to increase the range of motion of the destructed elbow in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients still have limited extension after TEA, and the causes of limited extension after TEA have yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

To examine whether widening of the joint space can cause such limited extension, we retrospectively analyzed 55 cases of linked TEA in patients with RA. There were seven male and 40 female with a mean age of 63.8 years (range, 30-80 years) and a mean follow-up of 7.5 ± 4.2 years (range, 2.5-15.6 years). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and radiological measurements were recorded. Widening of the joint space was calculated by subtracting the length measured on postoperative radiograph from preoperative radiograph.

RESULTS

MEPS and range of motion were significantly improved after surgery except for extension. The degree of extension was significantly correlated with radiological widening of the joint space in the limited extension group. Correlation analyses showed that postoperative limited extension was correlated with lower MEPS daily function.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited extension after linked TEA is partly derived from perioperative widening of the joint space and potentially limits daily function in patients with RA.

Conversion of a surgical elbow arthrodesis to total elbow arthroplasty

Arthrodesis of the elbow joint addresses pain due to intra-articular pathology, but with significant functional limitations. Loss of motion at the elbow is not completely compensated by the wrist and shoulder joints and elbow fusion is thus purely a salvage procedure. Advances in joint arthroplasty have allowed surgeons to address the functional limitations of arthrodesis, but despite these advances the elbow is still one of the joint replacements with higher complication rate. Conversion of a joint fusion to arthroplasty has been reported for the hip, knee, shoulder, and ankle. The takedown of a surgically fused elbow was reported in German literature in 2013. We present the first such case report in the English literature with a 49-year-old male whose status is elbow fusion performed for trauma 31 years prior.

The effect of using a cement gun with a narrow nozzle on cement penetration for total elbow arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

To compare the cement mantle characteristics associated with use of a narrow nozzle cement gun versus the use of a 60-mL catheter tip syringe.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric distal humeri were cemented with either a cement gun or a syringe without canal occlusion. The humeri were sectioned and photographed. The corticocancellous junction and the outer margin of the cement mantle were analyzed digitally. The corticocancellous junction defined the available area for cement penetration. The outline of the cement mantle defined the actual area of penetration. The ratio of penetration to the available area was recorded for each slice. The mean ratio for each humerus was multiplied by the number of slices in that sample containing cement to calculate a cement index.

RESULTS

The cement penetration ratios observed in cross-sections at the same level and the cement index were significantly greater with the use of the cement gun than with the use of the syringe. There was no difference in the number of slices that contained cement.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a cement gun with a narrow nozzle improved cement mantle characteristics compared with the use of a syringe when measured in a cadaveric model in the absence of canal occlusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Improving cement mantle characteristics may decrease the incidence of aseptic loosening after total elbow arythroplasty.

The outcome of total elbow arthroplasty in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (juvenile rheumatoid arthritis) patients

BACKGROUND

Elbow prosthetic replacement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can be complicated and technically challenging. Thus, we sought to evaluate the clinical benefit and the prosthetic longevity of primary semiconstrained linked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) performed to treat these patients.

METHODS

Between 1983 and 2005, 29 elbows in 24 patients (20 women and 4 men) had been replaced because of JIA. The mean age was 37 years (range, 24-68 years). Because of underlying deformity, the implant contour was modified for 9 elbows (31%) and a customized implant was inserted in 5 elbows (17%). The mean follow-up duration was 10.5 years (range, 4.6-20.1 years).

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 8 elbows underwent reoperation, including 6 (21%) that underwent implant revision. At most recent follow-up, 22 elbows (76%) subjectively had a satisfactory overall functional result. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 78 points (range, 50-100 points), with 18 elbows graded as having an excellent or good result. Compared with preoperative range of motion, the mean extension-flexion arc improved from 65° ± 44° to 89° ± 35° (P = .01), mean flexion improved from 113° ± 23° to 126° ± 26° (P = .02), and mean extension improved from 48° ± 25° to 37° ± 26° (P = .08). By use of the Kaplan-Meier survivorship method, the rate of TEA survival from any revision was 96.4% (95% confidence interval, 89.8%-100%) and 79.9% (95% confidence interval, 65.1%-97.5%) at 5 years and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Primary TEA for JIA patients is technically challenging and frequently requires implant modification or custom designs. These patients might have high complication and revision rates. However, most benefit from the intervention for a long term.

[Conversion of elbow arthrodesis to total elbow arthroplasty]

A 44-year-old patient was treated with elbow arthrodesis at a position of 90° due to primary osteoarthritis. Seven years later he was introduced to us due to progressive pain of both elbows. Although the arthrodesis had consolidated uneventfully, the patient felt massive restrictions due to eliminated extension/flexion and persistent pain. The right elbow developed primary osteoarthritis likewise. We performed arthroscopic debridement and arthrolysis of the right elbow. After a recovery phase of 2 months we converted the arthrodesis of the left elbow to total elbow arthroplasty. Three months later he achieved active flexion/extension of 0-30-100°, had no pain and was able to perform most activities of daily living again with his left elbow. Movement against resistance was possible, whereas strength was limited compared to the right side. After 9 months the flexion-extension arc was 0-25-110°. This case shows that conversion of arthrodesis to arthroplasty is possible at the elbow. Despite the long arthrodesis period of 7 years the patient was able to activate the elbow extensors and flexors.

Prevention and treatment of elbow stiffness: a 5-year update

Elbow stiffness is a challenging and common problem faced by upper extremity surgeons. Although functional improvements can be made with both nonsurgical and surgical management strategies, physicians must remain vigilant with efforts to prevent stiffness before it starts. Recent advancements in the biology and pathology of elbow contracture have led to improved understanding of this difficult problem, and they may lead to future breakthroughs in the prevention and treatment of elbow stiffness. This article serves as an update to our previous review of elbow stiffness, focusing on recent advancements in the past 5 years, as well as updating our current algorithm for treatment.

Experience with the Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty: 78 consecutive total elbow arthroplasties reviewed with an average 5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty is a linked implant. This study investigated the hypotheses that reliable results can be obtained in rheumatoid patients and in traumatic conditions and that the survival rate is similar to or better than what has been published for nonlinked implants.

METHODS

Surgery was performed on 70 consecutive patients (78 elbows) for an inflammatory arthritis (45 elbows) or a traumatic condition (33 elbows: 18 acute fractures of the distal humerus, 10 nonunions, and 5 post-traumatic arthritis).

RESULTS

At an average of 5 years of follow-up (2 to 11 years), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score for the group that had inflammatory arthritis (89 ± 13 points) was significantly higher than that for the group with a traumatic condition (80 ± 17 points). The QuickDASH score was not significantly different according to the etiology. Radiolucencies were observed in 17 cases around the humeral component and in 14 cases around the ulnar component. Bushing wear was observed in 14 cases. There were 27 complications, and 9 of them went to a revision procedure. The survival rate was 97.7% at 5 years and 91.0% at 10 years if we consider revision for aseptic loosening as an endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

The Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty allows treatment of a large spectrum of causes with satisfactory results. Better results have been obtained for rheumatoid patients than for patients with trauma. The rate of complication remains high even if the rate of implant revision stays low. However, the increased incidence of lucent lines around the ulnar component with follow-up and bushing wear are of concern.

Surgical treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Trauma to the elbow is a common cause of joint stiffness that might require surgical release. Release of the stiff elbow can be done by open or arthroscopic approach. There is no high-level evidence for the best surgical treatment modality for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The objective of this article was to review current available literature of studies reporting on open or arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed. All titles and abstracts of potentially relevant studies were reviewed, with a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the initial assessment for inclusion, 2 authors extracted data independently from the included articles.

RESULTS

Thirty articles were included, with an overall enrolment of 798 patients. No randomized controlled trials were retrieved. The first article was published in 1989 and the most recent in 2012. There were 4 different kinds of treatment modalities identified from the included studies: 1) open arthrolysis; 2) arthroscopic arthrolysis; 3) open arthrolysis with external fixation; and 4) open arthrolysis with distraction arthroplasty. The gain in range of motion was 51°, 40°, 88°, and 56° for groups 1-4, respectively. The average percentage of complications was 23, 5, 73, and 58 for groups 1-4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current literature is not sufficient enough to draw firm statistically based conclusions. However, as the amount of complications seems to rise with the extent of the surgical procedure, we would advise to treat as less invasive as possible (grade C).

[Classification of elbow stiffness and indications for surgical treatment]

An elbow can become stiff for a variety of reasons, such as intra-articular or extra-articular fractures, soft-tissue trauma, prolonged immobilization, thermal injury, infection, inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthrosis and heterotopic bone formation. Elbow stiffness is usually classified into extrinsic (affecting the capsule and extra-articular soft tissues), intrinsic (affecting the synovial and intra-articular structures) and mixed forms. Indications for operative treatment have to be considered in cases of failed conservative treatment with severe functional deficits. The choice of operative treatment has to be based on a thorough analysis of the underlying cause, the affected structures, the pathogenesis and the individual needs. Options are an arthroscopic or open arthrolysis, endoprostheses, hinged external fixators, interposition arthroplasty or combinations of these procedures.

Linked total elbow arthroplasty

This article provides an overview of the current state of linked total elbow arthroplasty. Discussed are the general indications for using a linked implant and currently available implants. Disease-specific indications, contraindications, surgical technique, and rehabilitation are discussed. The overall results and disease-specific results, as well as complications after a linked elbow arthroplasty, are reviewed.

Management of severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow by open arthrolysis and a monolateral hinged external fixator

Arthrolysis and dynamic splinting have been used in the treatment of elbow contractures, but there is no standardised protocol for treatment of severe contractures with an arc of flexion < 30 degrees . We present our results of radical arthrolysis with twin incisions with the use of a monolateral hinged fixator to treat very severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow. This retrospective study included 26 patients (15 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 30 years (12 to 60). The mean duration of stiffness was 9.1 months (5.4 to 18) with mean follow-up of 5.2 years (3.5 to 9.4). The mean pre-operative arc of movement was 15.6 degrees (0 degrees to 30 degrees ), with mean pre-operative flexion of 64.1 degrees (30 degrees to 120 degrees ) and mean pre-operative extension of 52.1 degrees (10 degrees to 90 degrees ). Post-operatively the mean arc improved to 102.4 degrees (60 degrees to 135 degrees ), the mean flexion improved to 119.1 degrees (90 degrees to 140 degrees ) and mean extension improved to 16.8 degrees (0 degrees to 30 degrees ) (p < 0.001). The Mayo elbow score improved from a mean of 45 (30 to 65) to 89 (75 to 100) points, and 13 had excellent, nine had good, three had fair and one had a poor result. We had one case of severe instability and one wound dehiscence which responded well to treatment. One case had deep infection with poor results which responded well to treatment. Our findings indicate that this method is very effective in the treatment of severe elbow contracture; however, a randomised controlled study is necessary for further evaluation.