An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry

Midterm Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Delta Ceramic Liner with a Titanium Taper Locking Band

Backgroud

This retrospective midterm study aimed to analyze seating properties, fracture types, noisy hips, and survivorship of a delta ceramic liner with a titanium taper locking band.

Methods

A total of 451 patients (538 hips) underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using the same design delta ceramic liner. Patients' clinical functions were evaluated using Harris Hip score, and the radiological migration or loosening of cementless cups was recorded. Component survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with failure defined as revision of any component or ceramic bearing for any reason. The worst-case survival scenario for noisy hip revision recommendations was estimated.

Results

A total of 475 patients (514 hips) were evaluated with an average follow-up of 9.5 years (range, 5-13.9 years). One hip (0.19%) had intraoperative asymmetric seating. No hips had loosening, osteolysis, wear, or delta ceramic liner or head fracture. Three patients (0.58%) reported reproducible squeaking. Two cups were revised due to recurrent dislocation, 2 femoral stems were revised for periprosthetic fractures, and 1 hip was treated for deep periprosthetic joint infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed a 10-year cup survival rate of 97.8% (95% CI, 95.2%-99.9%), with any revision as the endpoint. The worst-case scenario showed a 10-year survival rate of 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2%-99.2%).

Conclusions

The Delta ceramic liner with a titanium locking band on the mutlibearing cementless cup offered secure intraoperative seating properties with fewer ceramic-related complications at the midterm follow-up.

Two-Year Results of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Resurfacing in an International Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic HRA in an international multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients undergoing HRA between September 2018 and January 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr., Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score, and University of California, Los Angeles, Activity Score were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis or loosening, and heterotopic ossification formation.

RESULTS

The study identified 200 patients who reached a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.5 years). Of these, 185 completed PROMs follow-up at 2 years. There was a significant improvement in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < .001) and Oxford Hip Score (P < .001) between the preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes. Patients had improved activity scores on the University of California, Los Angeles, Active Score (P < .001), with 45% reporting a return to high-impact activity at 2 years. At 1 and 2 years, the Forgotten Joint Score was not significantly different (P = .38). There was no migration, osteolysis, or loosening of any of the implants. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up, with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There were 2 revisions, 1 for unexplained pain at 3 months due to acetabular component malposition and 1 at 33.5 months for acetabular implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The ceramic-on-ceramic resurfacing at 2 years postoperation demonstrates promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMs. Further long-term data are needed to support the widespread adoption of this prosthesis as an alternative to other HRA bearings.

[Tribology in arthroplasty : Friction and wear, a key to a long lifetime]

This article is intended to highlight one of the key roles in endoprosthetic treatment with artificial implants and the extension of service life. Like every joint, artificial joints are subject to the physical laws of friction and wear-in short, tribology. Material pairings, surfaces and mechanisms of action in particular play a decisive role here. The special features and current findings relating to the three largest synovial joints (hip, knee and shoulder) will be discussed in detail and suggestions will be made for future developments. Continuous developments in the field of the tribology of artificial joints can massively improve care for patients. The revision figures and reasons already show the success of individual improvements in recent years.

Factors Influencing Noise Following Primary Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The noise associated with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a concerning issue, while its underlying causes remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 119 patients (174 primary CoC THAs) who had a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12 to 106). A questionnaire was designed to collect information on nature, frequency, onset, duration, and impact of the noise. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated. Clinical evaluations, including Harris and Oxford hip scores, were documented at follow-up time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year).

RESULTS

Of the 174 hips, 31.6% reported noise, including 26 popping (14.9%), 24 clicking (12.1%), and 5 grinding (2.9%). No patients reported squeaking. Noisy hips had lower age (P = .009) and body mass index (P = .019). Among patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, 17 of 55 hips reported noise associated with smaller cup anteversion angle (P = .004), greater body height (P = .022), and larger acetabular cup size (P = .049). Noise typically began at a mean of 193 days (range, 1 to 2,598) after surgery and disappeared spontaneously in 50.9% of hips before final follow-up, with an average disappearance time of 211 days (range, 60 to 730). Noise did not affect daily life in 74.5% of patients, while 26.9% of patients who had popping reported painful sensations. One patient experienced joint dislocation, and another experienced a ceramic liner fracture during follow-up. No statistical difference was observed in outcome scores between noise and silent groups at 4 follow-up time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of noise after primary CoC THA is relatively high. Smaller cup anteversion and larger acetabular cup size were associated with noise production in patients who had developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Ceramic-related noise as an adverse outcome in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction Ceramic hip replacement bearings have shown to be low wearing and biocompatible. The last two generations of Biolox Forte and Biolox Delta ceramics have have established themselves as durable bearings. However, squeaking and noise from ceramic bearing THRs is well recognised in the 21st century.

The objective was to explore the problem of noise in the ceramic bearing of THA based on the analysis of the foreign and Russian literature.

Material and methods In presented the analysis of Foreign and Russian literature searches for the review were produced according to PRISMA recommendations using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, eLibrary. MINOR was used to assess the methodological quality of articles.

Results and Discussion Noise in ceramics is observed in 37.7 %. There are many theories on the origin and mechanism of noise including liner impingement and loading, film disruption, third body, microseparation and resonance. However, there is still no consensus on what is noise in the ceramic bearing and how to solve this problem.

Conclusion Literature review of ceramic bearing indicated enough unanswered questions. The noise may play a role as a predictor of improper use of endoprosthesis with accumulated database resulting in better understanding of the phenomenon, methods of the correction and timely prevention of ceramic breakage.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: I Can Hear You

Background

Squeaking is a known complication of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet there is a lack of studies specifically quantifying its loudness. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the incidence of squeaking in CoC THAs at long-term follow-up; (2) to identify risk factors; and (3) to quantify the loudness of the squeaking.

Methods

A specifically designed prospective questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and loudness of squeaking in 130 (110 patients) primary THAs with fourth-generation CoC bearings at a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. The loudness of the squeaking was determined by the decibel (dB) scale from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results

Overall, 28% of the CoC hips experienced squeaking. The mean onset was 5.7 years postoperatively, with 39% of the cases having their onset more than 5 years after their THA. Patients with a lower body mass index were more likely to report squeaking (P = .009). The mean loudness of the squeak was 35 dB (range, 10-70 dB) and was loud in 36% of the hips. Patients who developed squeaking early postoperatively had louder squeaking than those with a later onset (P = .007). The loudness of the squeaking sound progressed in 25% of the cases, and these hips had louder squeaking (P = .04).

Conclusions

Squeaking after CoC THA is not uncommon, can be relatively loud, and increases over time. This needs to be considered in young patients that are candidates for CoC THAs.

A Nomogram That Characterizes a Patient's Odds of Developing Squeaking After Fourth-generation Ceramic-on-ceramic THA

BACKGROUND

Although ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings result in the lowest wear rate of any bearing combination, postoperative squeaking remains worrisome. However, data concerning squeaking in long-term follow-up studies are still lacking, especially for fourth-generation CoC THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) After keeping the prosthesis in place for 10 years, what percentage of patients treated with fourth-generation CoC THA implants report squeaking, and are there points in time when squeaking occurs more frequently? (2) What are the characteristics, association with hip function, and factors associated with squeaking? (3) Can we create a nomogram that characterizes a patient's odds of experiencing squeaking based on the factors associated with it?

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2011, 1050 patients received primary THAs at our institution, 97% (1017) of whom received fourth-generation CoC THAs because this was the preferred bearing during this period. Of the 1017 eligible patients, 5% (54) underwent THAs performed by low-volume surgeons, 3% (30) were implanted with cemented prostheses, 2% (22) died, 1% (10) were immobile, 1% (six) underwent revision surgery, and 17% (169) were lost to follow-up before 10 years, leaving 726 patients for analysis here at a mean of 11 ± 1 years. In the study cohort, 64% (464) were male and 36% (262) were female, with a mean age of 44 ± 13 years at primary THA. We extracted data about articular noise from follow-up records in our institutional database and used a newly developed questionnaire to ascertain the percentage of patients who reported squeaking at the latest follow-up interval. Although not validated, the questionnaire was modeled on previous studies on this topic. The longitudinal pattern for squeaking was explored to find timepoints when squeaking occurs more frequently. Based on the questionnaire data, we calculated the percentages of frequent, reproducible, and avoidable squeaking. Hip function was evaluated with the Harris Hip Score and WOMAC score and compared between the squeaking and nonsqueaking groups. Factors associated with squeaking, which were examined in a multivariate analysis, were used to develop a nomogram.

RESULTS

At 10 years, 16% (116 of 726) of patients reported squeaking. Two squeaking peaks were determined, at 0 to 1 year and 8 to 10 years. Frequent, reproducible, and avoidable squeaking accounted for 42% (36 of 86), 20% (17 of 86), and 41% (35 of 86), respectively. The mean Harris Hip Score (93 ± 4 versus 94 ± 5; p = 0.81) and WOMAC score (16 ± 13 versus 15 ± 13; p = 0.23) did not differ between patients with squeaking and those without. After controlling for potential confounding variables such as etiology and head offset, we found that patients younger than 46 years (odds ratio 2.5 [95% confidence interval 1.5 to 5.0]; p < 0. 001), those who were male (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.5]; p = 0.04), those having a total flexion and extension arc of less than 50° (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.2 to 3.3]; p = 0.02), and those with the Corail hip implant (OR 4.1 [95% CI 2.1 to 7.7]; p < 0. 001) were more likely to report squeaking. We created a nomogram that can be used at the point of care that can help clinicians identify patients at a higher risk of experiencing squeaking; this nomogram had good performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77%).

CONCLUSION

As a potential late complication, squeaking after fourth-generation CoC THA is of concern and may be related to increased stripe wear. We recommend that surgeons use this nomogram to assess the odds of squeaking before selecting a bearing, especially in patients at high risk, to facilitate shared decision-making and improve patient satisfaction. Future external validation of the model is still needed to enhance its applicability.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Are CPR (Contact Patch to Rim) distance anomalies associated with the occurrence of abnormal noises from ceramic-on-ceramic THA?

INTRODUCTION

The ceramic-on-ceramic couple in total hip arthroplasties (THA) has the advantage of excellent wear resistance and the bioinert nature of its debris. Noise occurring from this friction torque is a common complication, the contributing factors of which are debated. The noise is caused by a lack of lubrication, due in most part to the positioning of the acetabular cup. The study of metal-on-metal couples identified that the calculation of the Contact Patch to Rim (CPR) distance provides information on lubrication defects and also that it is correlated with the wear of metal-on-metal implants. This CPR distance is not recognized to be correlated with the occurrence of noise for the ceramic-on-ceramic couple at a caliber ≤ 36mm. We therefore conducted a retrospective case-control study to assess: 1) The influence of the CPR distance on noise occurrence; 2) Whether other factors associated to noise occurrence exist?

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that a low CPR distance was correlated with noise occurrence.

METHOD

This was a case-control study with 3 controls for each case, analyzing 21 THAs (21 patients) with noise compared to 63 THAs without noise (63 patients) matched for age, sex and body mass index. These patients were taken from a continuous retrospective series of 96 patients for 104 total hip arthroplasties (THA) with a single operator and 4^th generation Biolox Delta ceramic-on-ceramic single implant, performed between 2007 and 2012. The calculation of the CPR distance was then performed for both groups using measurements of inclination angles, anteversion angles, and implant data regarding the head/insert contact angle, head/insert diameter and clearance.

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 7.1 years±1.2 [5 to 9.6], the mean CPR distance was lower in the noise group 10mm±3.3 [3.8 to 16.4] than in the control group 14.8mm±4.3 [7.3 to 24.4] (p=0.0007). The mean inclination angle was higher in the noise group 45.1°±7.8 [31 to 62] than in the control group 41.2°±7.2 [26 to 56] (p=0.04). The occurrence of noise was independent of anteversion, head caliber, cup diameter, neck length and stem size, and stem type (standard or lateralized).

CONCLUSION

A low CPR distance was correlated with the occurrence of noises, similarly a steep inclination was correlated with the occurrence of noises.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; Retrospective case-control study.

The occurrence of squeaking under wear testing standards for ceramic on ceramic total hip replacements

Ceramic on ceramic total hip replacement clinical reports may on occasion note a noise or squeaking. There is much debate on whether this is an actual concern, but some medical centres want to avoid any possible negative impact on the patients' wellbeing due to the noise generated. The aim of this study was to determine what sound frequencies can be picked up from hip testing standards for ceramic on ceramic under different lubrication conditions. The ISO-14242-1 (35° cup angle) and ISO-14242-4 (55° cup angle with a 4 mm translational mismatch) standards were used for testing with dry, water and serum lubrication conditions up to 10000 cycles. No sound was detected for water and serum conditions under standard walking (ISO-14242-1) testing. An audible noise with a frequency range of 0.4-0.8 kHz was picked up within 600 cycles under water and edge loading (ISO-14242-4) conditions. All dry testing produced a high pitch squeak when the frequency was higher than 2 kHz. One sample under dry edge loading conditions had an audible noise of 0.8 kHz, considered not as squeaking, as it was not high pitch. Dry testing for both, standard walking (ISO-14242-1) and edge loading (ISO-14242-4) conditions, which resulted in a high pitch noise, had a frequency range of 2-8 kHz and 5-9 kHz respectively. One sample tested with edge loading and serum produced a faint squeak noise after 6000 cycles with a frequency of 7 kHz. Edge loading due to ISO-14242-4 conditions had an increased torque which may be playing a role in increased friction leading to noise. Edge loading conditions were more prone to the generation of audible noise and squeaking whilst under lubricated conditions.

The impact of failed novel technology and technical errors on the revision burden in total hip arthroplasty: what percentage of revision hip arthroplasty was potentially avoidable?

BACKGROUND

Despite the high success rate of total hip arthroplasty (THA), new implant technologies continue to be developed. Although potentially useful, such novel developments may result in unintended consequences, leading to revision surgery, often prematurely. In several instances, new technology that appeared promising was later found to be inferior to existing technology and resulting in early revision surgery. Additionally, technical surgical errors may also lead to early revisions. Some have argued that revisions related to such phenomena are potentially avoidable. The present analysis investigates to what extent the contribution of "failed new technology" and "technical errors" contributes to the revision burden and to the need for premature revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 432 revision THAs and categorised them as either "late revisions" based on survivorship of 10 years or "premature revisions". Among both cohorts, we determined what percentage of revisions were potentially avoidable and due to failed novel technologies and technical errors, and what percent were "unavoidable".

RESULTS

Of the 432 revisions, 267 (62%) were considered premature and 38% were considered late. Of the premature revisions, 108 were considered potentially avoidable (81 failed novel technologies, 27 technical errors).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrates that new technology and surgical techniques can result in premature failure of THA. Surgeons should take caution when incorporating new implant technology or surgical techniques into their practice.

Fourth‐Generation Ceramic‐on‐Ceramic THA in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Minimum 10‐Year Follow‐Up

Objective

To report the long‐term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fourth‐generation ceramic‐on‐ceramic (CoC) bearing in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

We retrospectively identified 180 primary THAs performed in 110 patients with AS, including 100 (90.9%) men and 10 women (9.1%), from 2009 to 2011.The mean age of the patients at surgery was 33 years (range, 16 to 65 years). Cementless prostheses with fourth‐generation CoC bearings were used in all patients. Survivorship of the implants and postoperative complications were calculated. Functional improvement was assessed by the hip flexion‐extension range of motion (ROM) and Harris hip score (HHS). A special noise assessment questionnaire was performed at the last follow‐up. The cumulative incidence of noise was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Clinical characteristics and functional outcomes were compared in the hips with noise to those without noise.

Results

The mean follow‐up was 11 years (range, 10 to 12 years), and survivorship of the implants was 99.4% at the most recent follow‐up. The complications included dislocation (one hip, 0.6%), periprosthetic joint infection (one hip, 0.6%), mild to moderate pain (five hips, 2.8%), heterotopic ossification (12 hips, 6.7%), and noise (52 hips, 28.9%). The flexion‐extension ROM improved significantly with a median from 10° (range, 0 ~ 130°) to 100° (30 ~ 130°) after THA (p < 0.001), and the HHS increased significantly from 41 ± 20 to 90 ± 8 (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of noise at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 6.1% (95% CI, 2.6 ~ 9.6), 16.7% (95% CI, 11.2 ~ 22.1), and 28.9% (95% CI, 22.2 ~ 35.5), respectively, and that of squeaking at 0.5, 5, and 10 years was 4.4% (95% CI, 1.4 ~ 7.4), 13.3% (95% CI, 8.4 ~ 18.3), and 23.9% (95% CI, 17.6 ~ 30.1), respectively. None of the patients with noise generation in the hip reported it affecting daily activities or causing dissatisfaction. No differences in age, sex, BMI, disease duration, bilateral THA, the frequency of bony ankylosis, the proportion of using a 36‐mm‐diameter femoral head, pre/postoperative flexion‐extension ROM, or pre/postoperative HHS were found between hips with noise and those without noise (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

THAs with fourth‐generation CoC bearings exhibit excellent long‐term survival and clinical outcomes in patients with AS, with a very low dislocation rate. The incidence of noise associated with CoC bearings in THA performed in patients increases over time, but it does not affect postoperative hip function or daily activities.

Third-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A 10- to 16-year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term follow-up results of ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA), specifically, in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) are unknown. We evaluated (1) clinical results and radiological outcomes, (2) ceramic-related complications: noise and ceramic fracture, (3) osteolysis, and (4) survivorship after alumina COC THA in ONFH patients with longer than 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

From May 2003 to June 2009, 325 ONFH patients (403 hips) underwent primary THAs at our department. Among them, 231 patients (293 THAs) were followed for 10 to 16 (mean, 12.9) years. There were 148 men and 83 women, their mean age at the time of THA was 47.2 years, and their mean body index was 24.0 kg/m2. The postoperative CT scans were done in 160 hips.

RESULTS

Grinding sensation or squeak was noted in 6.8% (20/293), ceramic head fracture occurred in 2.4% (7/293) and acetabular osteolysis developed in 0.7% (2/293). All 7 ceramic fractures occurred in 28-mm short-neck heads. There was no detectable wear or prosthetic loosening, and the 16-year survivorship was 96.0% (95% confidence interval; 93.8% to 98.2%). The mean Harris hip score was 91.7 (range, 84 to 100) points at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10- to 16-year results of alumina COC THAs were encouraging with an excellent survivorship. However, ceramic fracture and noise still remain matters of concern. We recommend not to use 28-mm short-neck ceramic head to avoid ceramic head fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Typing and particle analysis of squeaking hip endoprostheses : First histopathological analysis to examine the squeaking pathogenesis of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings]

BACKGROUND

Since the use of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) hip endoprostheses complications in the form of squeaking noises have occasionally occurred.

OBJECTIVES

This is the first histopathological analysis of the synovia-like interface membrane (SLIM) of ceramic squeaking hip endoprostheses with the aim to gain new insights into the squeaking pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven CoC hip endoprostheses with squeaking pathogenesis are analyzed by SLIM consensus classification, particle algorithm, CD3 quantification, semiquantitative CD68 macrophages, Oil-Red positive macrophages, hemosiderin evaluation and in two cases by energy dispersive X‑ray spectroscopy (EDX).

RESULTS

In 1733 hip joint prosthesis pathology cases, a squeaking revision incidence of 0.40% was determined. In addition to SLIM type I (1/7), only SLIM type IV (6/7) was detected. 4/7 CoC cases showed combinations of micro, macro and, for the first time, supramacro (166.5 µm) ceramic wear particles. The EDX analysis confirmed the ceramic and an additional metallic abrasion. Increased focal concentrated low inflammatory markers (CD3/CD68) with hemosiderin (5/7) and lipid depositions (Oil-Red positive macrophages) (6/7) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A pathogenetic connection between SLIM type I/IV and squeaking can be assumed. SLIM types showed a partly light microscopic ceramic particle-dependent, partly independent predominantly low-grade inflammation. Hemosiderin and Oil-Red positive macrophages are signs of synovial tissue damage and indicate biomechanical misload (impingement) and dysfunction as cause of the squeaking pathogenesis.

Articular Noise After THA Using Delta CoC Bearings Has Little Impact on Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

To report clinical outcomes and survival at a minimum of 10 years of a consecutive series of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings and determine the incidence of articular noises, their risk factors, and impact on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

From a series of 456 CoC THAs, there were 25 revisions, 38 deceased, and 36 lost to follow-up. The remaining 357 hips were assessed at 11.1 ± 0.7 years (range, 10-14) using the Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Hip Score, and a questionnaire on articular noises. Kaplan-Meier survival was calculated, and multivariable analysis was performed to determine associations between articular noise and patient/surgical factors.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival was 96.3% for the cup, 96.5% for the stem, and 94.2% for all components. The Forgotten Joint Score was 79 ± 26 (range, 0-100), and Oxford Hip Score was 16 ± 7 (range, 12-60). The mean impact of articular noises on QoL was 1.8 ± 2.9 (range, 0-9): considered negligible in 60 hips (16%), moderate in 27 hips (7%), and severe in only 13 hips (4%). Multivariable analyses revealed that the incidence of articular noise decreased with age (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; P = .001), body mass index (OR, 0.85; P = .001), and in hips implanted with 32-mm (vs 36 mm) heads (OR, 0.18; P = .030).

CONCLUSION

Of 100 hips (28%) that reported some articular noises 10 years after CoC THA, the impact of articular noises on QoL was negligible for most patients. Although larger heads can improve mobility and reduce risks of dislocations, surgeons must be aware that increasing head size could also increase risks of articular noises, notably in young and active patients.

Correction of a Squeaky Knee After ACL Reconstruction Surgery: A Case Report

CASE

We report a squeaking knee complication on weight-bearing and active flexion-extension because of a migrating nonabsorbable FiberWire suture in a 16-year-old boy who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Although not physically limiting, the noise caused psychological distress in our patient as a young adult. As the noise did not resolve with nonsurgical treatment, we performed arthroscopic surgical correction and removed loose FiberWire strands protruding from the femoral tunnel which completely eliminated the sound.

CONCLUSIONS

Squeaking knee complications because of migrating nonabsorbable sutures post-ACL reconstruction surgery do not heal with time and can be corrected surgically.

Cementless total hip arthroplasty with delta-on-delta ceramic bearing in patients younger than 30 years

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the mechanical properties of alumina ceramics, the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients remains a matter of concern. We evaluated the results of cementless THA with the use of the delta ceramic bearing, and determined the prevalence of osteolysis, squeaking, and ceramic fracture in patients aged < 30 years at mid-term.

METHODS

From March 2008 to January 2012, 76 consecutive patients (91 hips), younger than 30 years, underwent cementless THA with Delta ceramic bearings. In each follow-up, the clinical evaluation including noise and radiological evaluations were recorded.

RESULTS

Among them, 72 patients (86 THAs) were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years (mean 70.8; 60-95.9 months). There were 44 men (47 hips) and 28 women (39 hips). The mean age at the time of the index arthroplasty was 25.9 (16-30) years and the mean preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 59.4 (23-79) points. HHS improved to 96.3 (64-100) points at the final follow-up evaluation. 8 hips (9.3%) exhibited grinding or squeaking. No hip had aseptic loosening and no hip was revised. No osteolysis was detected around any acetabular or femoral components.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cementless THA with the use of Delta ceramic bearing provides satisfactory results without osteolysis or ceramic fracture in patients aged <30 years at a mid-term follow-up.Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System (trial no. NCT01838096).

Mid-term outcomes of the R3™ delta ceramic acetabular system in total hip arthroplasty

Background

Whilst bony fixation of hip replacement has stable solutions, there remains controversy over which bearing best optimizes longevity and function. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing combinations are associated with lower risk of revision due to aseptic loosening and dislocation. Evidence for long-term functional outcomes of modern, 4th generation CoC bearings is limited. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes and complications of the R3™ Acetabular System (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Cordova, TN, USA) in combination with BIOLOX® Delta ceramic femoral head in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Between June 2009 and May 2011, 175 patients (178 hips) were enrolled into a prospective, study at 6 sites in Europe and prospectively followed-up at 3 months and 1, 3, 5, and 7 years postoperative.

Results

Total WOMAC score improved from 63 (range, 22–91) preoperative to 8 (range, 0–8) at 1-year follow-up and remained unchanged at 7-year follow-up. Modified Harris hip score improved from 45 (range, 10–87) preoperative to 83 (range, 25–100) at 3 months, 91 (range, 42–100) at 1 year, and 92 (range, 46, 100) at 7 years. UCLA Activity Rating Scale score improved from 3.3 (range, 1–8) preoperative to 6.2 (range, 2–8) at 1 year; it marginally declined to 5.8 (range, 3–8) at 7-year follow-up. There were 4 trochanteric fractures and 5 patients died of unrelated reasons. Three hips were revised (2 periprosthetic fractures and 1 subluxation). The 7-year cumulative survival rate was 98.3%.

Conclusion

Clinical and functional improvements of THA with CoC bearing are maintained at 7 years postoperative.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03566082, Registered 10 January 2018—retrospectively registered,

Recommendations for return to sports after total hip arthroplasty are becoming less restrictive as implants improve

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries are expected to exponentially increase in the upcoming years, likely because of the overall broader indication of THAs. With these developments, an increasing number of younger (< 50 years) and active patients will receive surgical interventions, and expectations for an active lifestyle will accordingly increase. In addition, surgeons now have a growing array of techniques and implant materials to choose from. Despite these developments, evidence to provide the best standard-of-care to patients with high expectations for return to sports (RTS) is scarce and urgently needed. What recommendations do arthroplasty surgeons currently make to patients with high return to sports expectations, what factors may influence their recommendations and what surgical techniques and implant specifications are considered favorable in the treatment of patients with a more active lifestyle? This study was conducted to analyze the current recommendations, patient assessment, and patient counseling after THA to identify trends and relevant factors for surgical decision-making in patients with high-RTS expectations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We designed a questionnaire comprising five general items and 19 specific items that included 46 sub-items for hip arthroplasty and conducted a survey among 300 German surgeons specialized in arthroplasty at the German Arthroplasty Society (AE) to assess expert opinions, recommendations, surgical decision-making, and patient counseling for patients with high expectations for RTS after THA.

RESULTS

The majority of surgeons (81.9%) were in favor of RTS after THA. Risks associated with sports after THA were considered minimal (1%), with periprosthetic fractures ranking highest, followed by hip dislocation and polyethylene wear. Some surgical decision-making was influenced by high-RTS expectations in regard to implant fixation, stem type, femoral head diameter, and bearing-surface tribology. We observed an increasingly liberal counseling of patients for high-impact sports.

CONCLUSION

With the improvement of implants and surgical techniques, surgeons are more willing to encourage patients to adopt a more active lifestyle. However, the true long-term limitations need further investigation in future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Expert opinions.

Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of a squeaking hip. A case report

Background

Squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is an unexpected complication which occurs in 1- 30% of patients. Revision surgery is required in 0.2% of the cases, when a ceramic fracture is suspected, or in case of severe malposition of the implants, subluxation, or impingement. Hip arthroscopy may be a useful diagnostic and therapeutic option in squeaking hips.

Case presentation

A patient presenting with a pain-free squeaking underwent hip arthroscopy to examine the sliding surfaces and the rim of the acetabulum, and to search for signs of impingement. Thorough lavage and debridement of hip synovitis and fibrous tissue was performed. The squeaking noise immediately disappeared after the surgery. The patient was allowed to fully weight bear as tolerated with 2 crutches for 2 weeks. Two years after the arthroscopy, the patient remained symptom-free.

Conclusions

The potential reasons for hip squeaking in our patient are discussed. Hip arthroscopy may prove useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic option for some patients presenting with a squeaking ceramic-on ceramic hip replacement.

Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching

BACKGROUND

With the development of 4th generation ceramic bearing, the large ceramic head is available for ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head to those with 3rd generation 28 mm head using propensity score matching.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 4th generation 36 mm ceramic head in 129 patients and 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs identified from 405 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 3rd generation 28 mm head by propensity score matching. There were 83 males and 50 females in both groups with a mean age of 55 years. There was no significant difference in other demographic features except for follow-up period (4.2 years in the 36 mm group and 6.4 years in the 28 mm group, p < 0.001). Clinical and radiological results and occurrence of complication were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Harris Hip Score was increased significantly from 46.4 to 92.1 in the 36 mm group and from 46.7 to 93.6 in the 28 mm group. No loosening or osteolysis was observed in the 36 mm group. However, one hip showed radiologic sign of loosening in the 28 mm group. As for complication, postoperative dislocation was more frequent in the 28 mm group (6 in the 28 mm group vs. 0 in the 36 mm group, p = 0.03). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in other results including inguinal pain, squeaking or ceramic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head significantly reduced postoperative dislocation rate without increasing the rate of inguinal pain, squeaking, or ceramic fracture compared to that with 3rd generation 28 mm head.

Third generation delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearing for total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up

Purpose

to evaluate the results of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) for total-hip-arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

261 THA using Delta-CoC, retrospectively analyzed. A 36 mm head was used in 189 cases and a 32/40 mm in the others. The series have been compared to a group of 89 THA with Forte-CoC.

Results

The Harris-Hip-Score improved from 49.1 ± 14.3 to 92.0 ± 8.9 (P < 0.001). In the Delta group there were one ceramic fracture and 2 dislocations. Two hips underwent revision. There were one revision in the Forte group for instability and one squeaking hip.

Conclusions

The new ceramic bearings provides a safe bearing for THA, with rare complications.

Data for registry and quality review can be retrospectively collected using natural language processing from unstructured charts of arthroplasty patients

Aims

Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers an automated method to extract data from unstructured free text fields for arthroplasty registry participation. Our objective was to investigate how accurately NLP can be used to extract structured clinical data from unstructured clinical notes when compared with manual data extraction.

Methods

A group of 1,000 randomly selected clinical and hospital notes from eight different surgeons were collected for patients undergoing primary arthroplasty between 2012 and 2018. In all, 19 preoperative, 17 operative, and two postoperative variables of interest were manually extracted from these notes. A NLP algorithm was created to automatically extract these variables from a training sample of these notes, and the algorithm was tested on a random test sample of notes. Performance of the NLP algorithm was measured in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) by calculating the accuracy of the variables collected, the ability of the algorithm to collect the correct information when it was indeed in the note (sensitivity), and the ability of the algorithm to not collect a certain data element when it was not in the note (specificity).

Results

The NLP algorithm performed well at extracting variables from unstructured data in our random test dataset (accuracy = 96.3%, sensitivity = 95.2%, and specificity = 97.4%). It performed better at extracting data that were in a structured, templated format such as range of movement (ROM) (accuracy = 98%) and implant brand (accuracy = 98%) than data that were entered with variation depending on the author of the note such as the presence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) (accuracy = 90%).

Conclusion

The NLP algorithm used in this study was able to identify a subset of variables from randomly selected unstructured notes in arthroplasty with an accuracy above 90%. For some variables, such as objective exam data, the accuracy was very high. Our findings suggest that automated algorithms using NLP can help orthopaedic practices retrospectively collect information for registries and quality improvement (QI) efforts. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):99–104.

Maximizing the Lubricant Film Thickness Between a Rigid Microtextured and a Smooth Deformable Surface in Relative Motion, Using a Soft Elasto-Hydrodynamic Lubrication Model

We design a pattern of microtexture features to increase hydrodynamic pressure and lubricant film thickness in a hard-on-soft bearing. We use a soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication model to evaluate the effect of microtexture design parameters and bearing operating conditions on the resulting lubricant film thickness and find that the maximum lubricant film thickness occurs with a texture density between 10% and 40% and texture aspect ratio between 1% and 14%, depending on the bearing load and operating conditions. We show that these results are similar to those of hydrodynamic textured bearing problems because the lubricant film thickness is almost independent of the stiffness of the bearing surfaces in full-film lubrication.

Squeaking and other noises in patients with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Noise in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a potential symptom of abnormal bearing wear. Squeaking and other prosthetic hip noises are multi-factorial phenomena that can be analysed and may provide prognostic information.

METHODS

46 patients with noisy CoC bearings were investigated using X-ray, computed tomography and joint fluid analysis, and classified into either high or low risk of ceramic liner fracture groups according to previously published guidelines. Noise events from the bearings of 16 high risk cases which were subsequently revised were compared with 30 patients in the low risk control group who did not undergo revision. Noise events were analysed for their physical characteristics using a standardised protocol and classified as either low frequency and short duration 'clicking' or long duration and high frequency 'squeaking'.

RESULTS

The peak frequency of squeaking during forward walking was significantly higher for patients in the case group who were revised, compared with the control group. The patient-reported onset of squeaking (46 months postoperatively) was earlier than short-noise emissions (82 months). In the standardised sequence of movements, short-noise always occurred more frequently than squeaking. Small heads (28 mm) were more likely to develop short-noise, while large heads (⩾32 mm) were more likely to develop squeaking.

DISCUSSION

Noise evaluation may provide additional value for predicting failure of CoC bearings, though some questions should be better investigated in a dedicated prospective trial.

The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR): a clinical quality registry to monitor and improve care in upper gastrointestinal cancers

PURPOSE

The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR) was developed to monitor and improve the quality of care provided to patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

It supports four cancer modules: pancreatic, oesophagogastric, biliary and primary liver cancer. The pancreatic cancer (PC) module was the first module to be implemented, with others being established in a staged approach. Individuals are recruited to the registry if they are aged 18 years or older, have received care for their cancer at a participating public/private hospital or private clinic in Australia and do not opt out of participation.

FINDINGS TO DATE

The UGICR is governed by a multidisciplinary steering committee that provides clinical governance and oversees clinical working parties. The role of the working parties is to develop quality indicators based on best practice for each registry module, develop the minimum datasets and provide guidance in analysing and reporting of results. Data are captured from existing data sources (population-based cancer incidence registries, pathology databases and hospital-coded data) and manually from clinical records. Data collectors directly enter information into a secure web-based Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data collection platform. The PC module began with a pilot phase, and subsequently, we used a formal modified Delphi consensus process to establish a core set of quality indicators for PC. The second module developed was the oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) module. Results of the 1 year pilot phases for PC and OGC modules are included in this cohort profile.

FUTURE PLANS

The UGICR will provide regular reports of risk-adjusted, benchmarked performance on a range of quality indicators that will highlight variations in care and clinical outcomes at a health service level. The registry has also been developed with the view to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which will further add to our understanding of the care of patients with these cancers.

Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients Within a 90-Day Bundled Payment Period?

BACKGROUND

We analyzed whether the total hospital cost in a 90-day bundled payment period for ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearings was changing over time, and whether the cost differential between ceramic bearings and metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE) bearings was approaching the previously published tipping point for cost-effectiveness of US$325.

METHODS

A total of 245,077 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative hospital claims database. The total inpatient cost, calculated up to 90 days after index discharge, was computed using cost-to-charge ratios, and hospital payment was analyzed. The differential total inpatient cost of C-PE and COC bearings, compared to metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE), was evaluated using parametric and nonparametric models.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient and clinical factors, and the year of surgery, the mean hospital cost up to 90 days for primary THA with C-PE or COC was within ±1% of the cost for primary THA with M-PE bearings (P < .001). From the nonparametric analysis, the median total hospital cost was US$296-US$353 more for C-PE and COC than M-PE. Cost differentials were found to decrease significantly over time (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patient and clinical factors had a far greater impact on the total cost of inpatient THA surgery than bearing selection, even when including readmission costs up to 90 days after discharge. Our findings indicate that the cost-effectiveness thresholds for ceramic bearings relative to M-PE are changing over time and increasingly achievable for the Medicare population.

Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing increase the rate of squeaking after THA?: A retrospective study

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications in a single center of 135 delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and explore the occurrence rate of squeaking in 4th generation COC THAs and collate the risk factors for squeaking.We retrospectively analyzed consecutive cohorts of 127 patients (135 hips) who had primary THA with delta COC bearings in our hospital between April 2010 and April 2012. Preoperative Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. We also evaluated ceramic fracture, squeak, mid-term results, and survival.In our study, the final patient final follow-up date was July 31, 2016. The mean preoperative HHS improved from 39.5 to 93.1 points. Mean preoperative UCLA score was 3.2 points, improving to 8.2 points. The mean preoperative total WOMAC score was 55.5 points and the mean total WOMAC score was 13.3 points at the final follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot of revision for any reason as the end point was 98.5% and survival with ceramic fracture as the end point was 99.2% at a mean of 70 months' follow-up. One post-operative ceramic liner rim fracture occurred at 50 months after surgery. Thirteen of the 135 hips produced a squeaking sound. There were no significant differences in gender (P = .56), age (P = .20), body mass index (BMI) (P = .11), diagnosis (P = .46), cup inclination (P = .36), or cup anteversion (P = 1.0) between the squeaking and non-squeaking groups. However, the incidence of squeaking in the 36 mm COC femoral head bearings was higher than in the 28 mm size (13.6% vs 2.1%, P = .033).The 4th generation COC bearing performed well and provides an encouraging rate of survival with no osteolysis or loosening. However, we found that a squeaking sound associated with use of the delta ceramic occurred at a rate of 9.6%, with the larger-diameter heads having significantly higher incidence.

Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the cost for ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) was changing over time, and if the cost differential between ceramic bearings and metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE) bearings was approaching the previously published tipping point for cost-effectiveness of $325.

METHODS

A total of 245,077 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative hospital claims database. The inpatient hospital cost, calculated using cost-to-charge ratios, and hospital payment were analyzed. The differential cost of C-PE and COC bearings, compared to M-PE, were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric models.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient and clinical factors, and the year of surgery, the mean hospital cost and payments for primary THA with a C-PE or COC was within ±1% of the cost for primary THA with M-PE bearings (P < .001). From the nonparametric analysis, the median hospital cost was $318-$360 more for C-PE and COC than M-PE. The differential in median Medicare payment for THA with ceramic bearings compared to M-PE was <$100. Cost differentials were found to decrease significantly over time (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patient and clinical factors had a far greater impact on the cost of inpatient THA surgery than bearing selection. Because we found that costs and cost differentials for ceramic bearings were decreasing over time, and approaching the tipping point, it is likely that the cost-effectiveness thresholds relative to M-PE are likewise changing over time and should be revisited in light of this study.

Increasing Burden of Total Hip Arthroplasty Revisions in Patients Between 45 and 64 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions in the U.S. from 2007 to 2013.

METHODS

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify all THA revisions in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2007 to 2013. The diagnoses leading to the revisions, types of revisions, major inpatient complications, and hospital and patient characteristics were compared between 2007 and 2013. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for complications in 2013 versus 2007.

RESULTS

This study identified 320,496 THA revisions performed between 2007 and 2013. From 2007 to 2013, the THA revision rate adjusted for U.S. population growth increased by 30.4% in patients between 45 and 64 years of age and decreased in all other age groups. The rate of surgically treated THA dislocations decreased by 14.3% from 2007 to 2013 (p < 0.0001). The mean length of the hospital stay and hospital costs for THA revision were significantly lower in 2013 than in 2007 (4.6 versus 5.8 days and $20,463 versus $25,401 both p < 0.0001). A multivariable model showed that the odds of a patient undergoing THA revision having the following inpatient complications were significantly lower in 2013 than in 2007: deep vein thrombosis (OR = 0.57, p = 0.004), pulmonary embolism (OR = 0.45, p = 0.047), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.52, p = 0.003), transfusion (OR = 0.64, p < 0.0001), pneumonia (OR = 0.56, p < 0.0001), urinary tract infection (OR = 0.66, p < 0.0001), and mortality (OR = 0.50, p = 0.0009). Notably, the odds of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility were also lower in 2013 than in 2007 (OR = 0.71, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The THA revision rate has significantly increased in patients between 45 and 64 years of age. However, the rate of surgically treated THA dislocations has decreased significantly. This may indicate that evolving techniques and implants are improving stability. The rate of inpatient complications following THA revision also decreased significantly from 2007 to 2013.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

3^rd generation ceramic bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the potential to have better mechanical strength and wear properties than their predecessors. At present, there are few studies looking at the long-term results of this latest generation of ceramic bearings. The purpose of our study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of 3^rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA and the incidence of ceramic specific complications such as squeaking and bearing surface fracture.

METHODS

The database of the senior author (J.D.W.) was reviewed. A total of 126 hip replacements performed in 108 patients (average age 39.6 years) with an average follow-up of 12.1 years (10-16 years) was identified. Clinical notes and plain radiographs were reviewed. To measure function, patients were contacted and an Oxford Hip Questionnaire was completed. Patients were also directly questioned about the presence of squeaking or any other sounds from the hip. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of wear, osteolysis, loosening and heterotopic ossification. The abduction angle of the acetabular component was measured.

RESULTS

The average Oxford Hip Score was 39.8 out of 48. Survivorship at 10 years was 94.6% (95% CI) with revision for any cause as the endpoint. There was 1 femoral head fracture, no osteolysis, no squeaking and no detectable wear.

CONCLUSIONS

The good clinical and radiographic results for this series of patients are similar to other recent long-term studies looking at 3^rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA. The results compare favourably with other bearing surfaces. The lack of osteolysis associated with this articulation is encouraging and may also make it a good choice for younger patients requiring total hip replacement.

Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: What is the evidence?

Wear, corrosion and periprosthetic osteolysis are important causes of failure in joint arthroplasty, especially in young patients.

Ceramic bearings, developed 40 years ago, are an increasingly popular choice in hip arthroplasty. New manufacturing procedures have increased the strength and reliability of ceramic materials and reduced the risk of complications.

In recent decades, ceramics made of pure alumina have continuously improved, resulting in a surgical-grade material that fulfills clinical requirements.

Despite the track record of safety and long-term results, third-generation pure alumina ceramics are being replaced in clinical practice by alumina matrix composites, which are composed of alumina and zirconium.

In this review, the characteristics of both materials are discussed, and the long-term results with third-generation alumina-on-alumina bearings and the associated complications are compared with those of other available ceramics.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:7-14. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170034

Mechanical tests, wear simulation and wear particle analysis of carbon-based nanomultilayer coatings on Ti6Al4V alloys as hip prostheses

Carbon-based nanomultilayer coatings were deposited on medical-grade Ti₆Al₄V alloy using a magnetron sputtering technique under a graded bias voltage.

Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomised trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

The primary aim of this independent prospective randomised trial was to compare serum metal ion levels for ceramic-on-metal (CoM) and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our one-year results demonstrated elevation in metal ion levels above baseline with no significant difference between the CoM and MoM groups. This paper reviews the five-year data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The implants used in each patient differed only in respect to the type of femoral head (ceramic or metal). At five-year follow-up of the 83 enrolled patients, data from 67 (36 CoM, 31 MoM) was available for comparison.

RESULTS

The mean serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels remained above baseline in both groups (CoM: Co 1.16 μg/l (0.41 to 14.67), Cr 1.05 μg/l (0.16 to 12.58); MoM: Co 2.93 μg/l (0.35 to 30.29), Cr 1.85 μg/l (0.36 to 17.00)) but the increase was significantly less in the CoM cohort (Co difference p = 0.001, Cr difference p = 0.002). These medium-term results, coupled with lower revision rates from national joint registries, suggest that the performance of CoM THA may be superior to that of MoM.

CONCLUSION

While both bearing combinations have since been withdrawn these results provide useful information for planning clinical surveillance of CoM THAs and warrants continued monitoring. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1298-1303.

Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: No evidence of contribution from the trunnion morse taper

Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) was investigated with an acoustic monitoring device to distinguish between squeaking emanating from the trunnion morse taper (TMT) connection versus the articular surface. 82 patients with implant problems scheduled for revision were selected and acoustic emissions (AE) with simple movements monitored. Five of these patients with CoC implants underwent surgery and their retrieved implant components were analyzed in vitro. In vivo recordings of all 82 patients found audible squeaks produce frequency content across the entire 0-50 kHz spectrum. Of the five CoC implants the in vivo peak frequency range of flexion/extension motions was 0.8 kHz and comparable to the range of in vitro testing (0.2 kHz). In vitro TMT connection motions were very large comparatively, producing a higher average peak frequency range of 22.5 kHz. All retrieved implants showed evidence of wear at the TMT connection. These findings suggest, the TMT connection does not directly cause audible squeaking. Wear occurring at this junction may contribute to debris which disrupt lubrication, increase friction, and produce noise. This observation supports current evidence suggesting that squeaking is from the bearing surface. Our findings are the first to demonstrate that in CoC THA the recordable noise of a hip squeak does not originate nor have contribution from the TMT connection. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1793-1798, 2017.

3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

3rd generation ceramic bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the potential to have better mechanical strength and wear properties than their predecessors. At present, there are few studies looking at the long-term results of this latest generation of ceramic bearings.The purpose of our study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA and the incidence of ceramic specific complications such as squeaking and bearing surface fracture.

METHODS

The database of the senior author (J.D.W.) was reviewed. A total of 126 hip replacements performed in 108 patients (average age 39.6 years) with an average follow-up of 12.1 years (10-16 years) was identified. Clinical notes and plain radiographs were reviewed. To measure function, patients were contacted and an Oxford Hip Questionnaire was completed. Patients were also directly questioned about the presence of squeaking or any other sounds from the hip. Radiographs were evaluated for signs of wear, osteolysis, loosening and heterotopic ossification. The abduction angle of the acetabular component was measured.

RESULTS

The average Oxford Hip Score was 39.8 out of 48. Survivorship at 10 years was 94.6% (95% CI) with revision for any cause as the endpoint. There was 1 femoral head fracture, no osteolysis, no squeaking and no detectable wear.

CONCLUSIONS

The good clinical and radiographic results for this series of patients are similar to other recent long-term studies looking at 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA. The results compare favourably with other bearing surfaces. The lack of osteolysis associated with this articulation is encouraging and may also make it a good choice for younger patients requiring total hip replacement.

It Is a Brave New World: Alternative Payment Models and Value Creation in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Creating Value for TJR, Quality and Cost-Effectiveness Programs

BACKGROUND

The increasing cost of our country's healthcare is not sustainable. To address this crisis, the federal government is transiting healthcare reimbursement from the traditional volume-based system to a value-based system. As such, increasing healthcare value has become an essential point of discussion for all healthcare stakeholders.

METHODS

The purpose of this study is to discuss the importance of healthcare value as a means to achieve this goal of value-based medicine and 3 methods to create value in total joint arthroplasty.

RESULTS

These methods are to: (1) improve outcomes greater than the increased costs to achieve this improvement, (2) decrease costs without affecting outcomes, and (3) decrease costs while simultaneously improving outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Following these guidelines will help practitioners thrive in a bundled care environment.

Do Changes in the Production Process Affect the Outcome of Ceramic Liners: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

In 2011, the current liner was withdrawn from the market because of the potential risk for liner fracture secondary to increased pressures used to assemble the metal locking ring. The present study provides a short-term follow-up of patients with this implant.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 63 consecutive hips in 53 patients operated by a single surgeon using a recalled ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. There were 30 women and 23 men with an average age of 50.6 years (range 20.3-63.5 years). The mean follow-up was 36.8 months.

RESULTS

Six hips in 6 patients were revised (9.5%) because of a liner-fracture during the follow-up period. All liner fractures were identified on computer tomography imaging. Nine patients had self-reported episodes of squeaking (14.3%). All 6 patients that underwent revision surgery for liner fracture described squeaking before revision. There were no revisions for other causes. Two of the revised patients had a subsequent dislocation (33%).

CONCLUSION

The recalled ceramic liner lots have an increased liner fracture rate. Patients with mechanical symptoms or squeaking should undergo computer tomography to rule out liner facture.

Tribology of total hip arthroplasty prostheses: What an orthopaedic surgeon should know

Articulating components should minimise the generation of wear particles in order to optimize long-term survival of the prosthesis.

A good understanding of tribological properties helps the orthopaedic surgeon to choose the most suitable bearing for each individual patient.

Conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene articulating either with metal or ceramic, ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal are the most commonly used bearing combinations.

All combinations of bearing surface have their advantages and disadvantages. An appraisal of the individual patient’s objectives should be part of the assessment of the best bearing surface.

Cite this article: Rieker CB. Tribology of total hip arthroplasty prostheses: what an orthopaedic surgeon should know. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:52-57. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000004.

Outcomes of Ceramic Bearings After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of ceramic bearings used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the Medicare population.

METHODS

A total of 315,784 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2005 and 2014 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative hospital claims database. Outcomes of interest included infection, dislocation, revision, or mortality at any time point after primary surgery. Propensity scores were developed to adjust for selection bias in the choice of bearing type at index primary surgery.

RESULTS

For primary THA patients treated with ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) bearings and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings, there was significantly reduced risk of infection relative to metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE) bearings (C-PE hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, P = .001; COC HR: 0.74, P = .01). For the C-PE cohort, we also observed reduced risk of dislocation (HR: 0.81, P < .001) and mortality (HR: 0.92, P < .001). There was no significant difference in risk of revision for either the C-PE or COC bearing cohorts when compared with M-PE. For the COC cohort, there was no significant difference in dislocation or mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

As in previous studies, we found that ceramic bearings have similar overall revision risk as M-PE bearings in primary THA at 8-9 years of follow-up. The results indicate that, after adjusting for selection bias and various confounding patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-related factors, Medicare primary THA patients treated with ceramic bearings exhibit lower risk of infection than those treated with M-PE bearings. In addition, C-PE bearings were associated with lower risk of dislocation and mortality.

Hip Squeaking after Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective:

The present study aimed to review the characteristics and influencing factors of squeaking after ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to analyze the possible mechanisms of the audible noise.

Data Sources:

The data analyzed in this review were based on articles from PubMed and Web of Science.

Study Selection:

The articles selected for review were original articles and reviews found based on the following search terms: “total hip arthroplasty”, “ceramic-on-ceramic”, “hip squeaking”, and “hip noise.”

Results:

The mechanism of the squeaking remains unknown. The possible explanations included stripe wear, edge loading, a third body, fracture of the ceramic liner, and resonance of the prosthesis components. Squeaking occurrence is influenced by patient, surgical, and implant factors.

Conclusions:

Most studies indicated that squeaking after CoC THA was the consequence of increasing wear or impingement, caused by prosthesis design, patient characteristics, or surgical factors. However, as conflicts exist among different articles, the major reasons for the squeaking remain to be identified.

High prevalence of noise following Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Aims

We evaluated the short-term functional outcome and prevalence of bearing-specific generation of audible noise in 301 patients (336 hips) operated on with fourth generation (Delta) medium diameter head, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs).

Patients and Methods

There were 191 female (63%) and 110 male patients (37%) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 78) and mean follow-up of 2.1 years (1.3 to 3.4). Patients completed three questionnaires: Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Research and Development 36-item health survey (RAND-36) and a noise-specific symptom questionnaire. Plain radiographs were also analysed. A total of three hips (0.9%) were revised.

Results

There were 52 patients (54 hips, 17%) who reported noise, and in 25 (48%) of them the noise was frequently heard. In the multiple regression analysis, the only independent risk factor for noise was a specific THA brand, with a threefold increased risk (95% confidence intervals 1.39 to 6.45, p = 0.005) of noise compared with the reference THA brand. Patients with noisy hips had lower median OHS (43 versus 46.5, p = 0.002) and their physical functioning (p = 0.021) subscale in RAND-36 was reduced.

Conclusion

Noise was surprisingly common in this population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:44–50.

Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively?

Background and purpose - Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is recognized as an important tool for evaluating the outcome and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We wanted to compare patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores from patients with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THAs and those with metal-on-metal (MoM) THAs to scores from patients with metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THAs, and to determine the influence of THA-related noise on PROM scores. Patients and methods - We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey in a cohort of patients identified from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. The PROMs included were: hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), EQ-5D-3L, EQ VAS, UCLA activity score, and questions about noise from the THA. The response rate was 85% and the number of responders was 3,089. Of these, 45% had CoC THAs, 17% had MoM THAs, and 38% had MoP THAs, with a mean length of follow-up of 7, 5, and 7 years, respectively. Results - Compared to MoP THAs, the mean PROM scores for CoC and MoM THAs were similar, except that CoC THAs had a lower mean score for HOOS Symptoms than did MoP THA. 27% of patients with CoC THAs, 29% with MoM THAs, and 12% with MoP THAs reported noise from their hip. For the 3 types of bearings, PROM scores from patients with a noisy THA were statistically significantly worse than those from patients with a silent MoP THA. The exception was noisy CoC and MoM THAs, which had the same mean UCLA activity score as silent MoP THAs. Interpretation - A high proportion of patients reported noise from the THA, and these patients had worse PROM scores than patients with silent MoP THAs.

Primary total hip arthroplasty using 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulation

PURPOSE

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) is currently a popular bearing combination in young patients in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results and complications of cementless THA with 3rd generation CoC articulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2001 to January 2008, 310 primary THAs were performed in 300 patients using 3rd generation CoC articulation. The mean follow-up period was 8.9 years and the mean age at index surgery was 54.6 years. Patient clinical outcome was evaluated with the Harris Hip Score. Radiographic evaluations was performed to analyse osteolysis, implant fixation and loosening.

RESULTS

Mean Harris Hip Score at last follow-up was 95.4 (76-100). Radiographic analysis demonstrated no evidence of stem or cup loosening and there were no cases of osteolysis. Ceramic wear was not detectable on the plain radiograph. Complications requiring revision occurred in 12 cases; 2 ceramic head fractures, 4 dislocations, 2 deep infections and 4 cases of periprosthetic fracture. The cohort had an overall revision rate of 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes using cementless THA with 3rd generation CoC articulation were satisfactory. Although the mechanical properties of ceramic materials have improved, there are still problems such as ceramic fracture and squeaking. More clinical study and investigation for alternative bearing are necessary to reduce complications. 4th generation CoC or ceramic on cross linked polyethylene may address some of these issues.

National Trends in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Extremely Young Patients: A Focus on Bearing Surface Usage From 2009 to 2012

BACKGROUND

The ideal bearing surface for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients remains a debate. Data on recent national trends are lacking. The purpose of this study is to provide an analysis on the national epidemiologic trends of bearing surface usage in patients aged ≤30 years undergoing THA from 2009 through 2012.

METHODS

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2009 to 2012, 9265 THA discharges (4210 coded by bearing surface) were identified in patients aged ≤30 years. Prevalence of surface type was analyzed along with patient and hospital demographic data. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (SAS version 9.1; SAS, Inc, Cary, NC). Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing surfaces were most commonly used, representing 35.6% of cases, followed by metal-on-polyethylene (MoP; 28.0%), metal-on-metal (MoM; 19.3%), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC; 17.0%) bearing surfaces. Hard-on-hard bearing surfaces (MoM and CoC) represented only 36.4% of cases, a significant decrease from previously reported findings (2006-2009) where hard-on-hard bearing surfaces were the majority (62.2%; P < .05). Hard-on-hard bearing surface usage decreased from 2009 to 2012 (MoM: 29.7% to 10.2%; CoC: 20.0% to 14.7%), whereas hard-on-soft bearing surface usage (MoP and CoP) increased. CoP bearing surfaces saw the most significant increase from 25.7% in 2009 to 48.2% in 2012. A cost analysis revealed that CoP discharges were associated with higher hospital charges than other surface types, with an average charge of $66,457 (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Use of hard-on-hard surfaces has decreased significantly in this population, whereas CoP and MoP surfaces have become increasingly common. Determining the optimal bearing surface for extremely young patients continues to be a challenge for orthopedic surgeons as they weigh the risks and benefits of each.

Outcomes of Ceramic Bearings After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the utilization and outcomes of ceramic bearings used in revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) in the Medicare population.

METHODS

A total of 31,809 patients aged >65 years at the time of revision surgery who underwent R-THA between 2005 and 2013 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative claims database. Outcomes of interest included relative risk of readmission (90 days) or infection, dislocation, rerevision, or mortality at any time point after revision. Propensity scores were developed to adjust for selection bias in the choice of bearing type at revision surgery.

RESULTS

The utilization of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings in R-THA increased from 5.3% to 26.6% and from 1.8% to 2.5% in between 2005 and 2013, respectively. For R-THA patients treated with C-PE bearings, there was reduced risk of 90-day readmission (hazard ratio, HR: 0.90, P = .007). We also observed a trend for reduced risk of infection with C-PE (HR: 0.88) that did not reach statistical significance (P = .14). For R-THA patients treated with COC bearings, there was reduced risk of dislocation (HR: 0.76, P = .04). There was no significant difference in risk of rerevision or mortality for either the C-PE or COC bearing cohorts when compared with the metal-on-polyethylene bearing cohort.

CONCLUSION

Medicare patients treated in a revision scenario with ceramic bearings exhibit similar risk of rerevision, infection, or mortality as those treated with metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Conversely, we found an association between the use of specific ceramic bearings in R-THA and reduced risk of readmission (C-PE) and dislocation (COC).

Prospective evaluation of short and mid-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using the Accolade™ stem

PURPOSE

Cementless press-fit total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the Accolade stem (Stryker AccoladeTM TMZF, Mahwah, New Jersey) has demonstrated variable implant survivorship and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyse the: 1) implant survivorship; 2) complications; 3) functional outcomes; 4) overall quality of life; and 5) patient expectations and satisfaction following THA with this particular press-fit stem.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of 222 patients who underwent THA at 7 institutions between 2006 and 2009 using the Accolade stem (Stryker Inc. Mahwah, New Jersey) was evaluated. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and SF-12 were used to assess the outcomes at 2- and 5-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was calculated at 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The 5-year aseptic and all-cause survivorship rates were 99.4% (95% CI, 96.3 to 99.9%) and 97.9% (95% CI, 94.6 to 99.2%), respectively. At 2 and 5 years postoperatively, the patients demonstrated a mean HHS of approximately 89 points and 92 points, respectively. The mental and physical components of the SF-12 mean score increased with the physical component having a more marked increase. The mental and physical components of the SF-12 score increased to a mean of 46 and 45 points at 2 and 5 years, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, over 90% of patients were satisfied with their outcome in a majority of areas surveyed.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that the use of this press-fit construct results in tremendous improvements in functional and quality of life outcomes, along with excellent survivorship at short- and mid-term follow-up.