Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis

The evolving role and technique of hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents

Hip Arthroscopy in the pediatric and adolescent hip has evolved from its role as a diagnostic tool to a primary modality of management of variety of hip pathologies in children and adolescents. This article reviews current concepts and advances in hip arthroscopy in this population. We discuss the indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications of hip arthroscopy in children and adolescents. We explore the newer indications of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of SCFE (Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis) deformity correction, borderline hip dysplasia, septic arthritis, infantile developmental dysplasia, Perthes disease, and the existing and developing evidence. Finally, we address the challenges and future directions in research, education, and training, unique to the pediatric and adolescent population.

Key Concepts

(1)Hip arthroscopy has significant surgical applications in the pediatric and adolescent population, and can be used to help address several intra-articular as well as extra-articular pathologies.(2)The indications and potential for arthroscopic interventions and associated arthroscopic techniques is growing and developing rapidly, along with improving technology, techniques, and training.(3)FAI (Femoro Acetabular Impingement) and labral pathology are the most common indications for surgery in the adolescent, and clinical outcome studies show excellent results. However, nonoperative optimization should be strongly emphasized before surgical consideration.(4)Hip arthroscopy is minimally invasive and relatively low risk, though main risks and complications to be aware of is the potential need for revision or further surgery, transient neuropraxia of the pudendal nerve, surgical site infection, implant/tool-related breakage or failure, failed surgery, and venous thromboembolism.(5)Continued research and innovation in the field of pediatric hip arthroscopy are essential for further improving outcomes and expanding treatment options for young patients with hip disorders, and more pediatric-specific clinical research is needed.

Do Osteochondroplasty Alone, Intertrochanteric Derotation Osteotomy, and Flexion-Derotation Osteotomy Improve Hip Flexion and Internal Rotation to Normal Range in Hips With Severe SCFE? - A 3D-CT Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) leads to femoroacetabular impingement and restricted hip motion. We investigated the improvement of impingement-free flexion and internal rotation (IR) in 90 degrees of flexion following a simulated osteochondroplasty, a derotation osteotomy, and a combined flexion-derotation osteotomy in severe SCFE patients using 3D-CT-based collision detection software.

METHODS

Preoperative pelvic CT of 18 untreated patients (21 hips) with severe SCFE (slip-angle>60 degrees) was used to generate patient-specific 3D models. The contralateral hips of the 15 patients with unilateral SCFE served as the control group. There were 14 male hips (mean age 13±2 y). No treatment was performed before CT. Specific collision detection software was used for the calculation of impingement-free flexion and IR in 90 degrees of flexion and simulation of osteochondroplasty, derotation osteotomy, and combined flexion-derotation osteotomy.

RESULTS

Osteochondroplasty alone improved impingement-free motion but compared with the uninvolved contralateral control group, severe SCFE hips had persistently significantly decreased motion (mean flexion 59±32 degrees vs. 122±9 degrees, P <0.001; mean IR in 90 degrees of flexion -5±14 degrees vs. 36±11 degrees, P <0.001). Similarly, the impingement-free motion was improved after derotation osteotomy, and impingement-free flexion after a 30 degrees derotation was equivalent to the control group (113± 42 degrees vs. 122±9 degrees, P =0.052). However, even after the 30 degrees derotation, the impingement-free IR in 90 degrees of flexion persisted lower (13±15 degrees vs. 36±11 degrees, P <0.001). Following the simulation of flexion-derotation osteotomy, mean impingement-free flexion and IR in 90 degrees of flexion increased for combined correction of 20 degrees (20 degrees flexion and 20 degrees derotation) and 30 degrees (30 degrees flexion and 30 degrees derotation). Although mean flexion was equivalent to the control group for both (20 degrees and 30 degrees) combined correction, the mean IR in 90 degrees of flexion persisted decreased, even after the 30 degrees combined flexion-derotation (22±22 degrees vs. 36 degrees±11, P =0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation of derotation-osteotomy (30 degrees correction) and flexion-derotation-osteotomy (20 degrees correction) normalized hip flexion for severe SCFE patients, but IR in 90 degrees of flexion persisted slightly lower despite significant improvement. Not all SCFE patients had improved hip motion with the performed simulations; therefore, some patients may need a higher degree of correction or combined treatment with osteotomy and cam-resection, although not directly investigated in this study. Patient-specific 3D-models could help individual preoperative planning for severe SCFE patients to normalize the hip motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

Outcomes in Pediatric Hip FAI Surgery: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Femoracetabular impingement (FAI) is a common source of hip pain in children and adolescents. While nonoperative therapies and open surgical procedures can be effective, hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive treatment option with substantial benefit. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the current role of hip arthroscopy in treating FAI within the pediatric population. This article examines its efficacy through a review of hip arthroscopy outcomes in the contemporary orthopaedic literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Morphologic changes in the acetabulum and proximal femur seen in FAI can be attributed to a multitude of etiologies-including idiopathic FAI, Legg-Calve-Perthes, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In general, arthroscopic treatment of FAI secondary to these conditions leads to statistically significant improvements in pain and patient-reported outcomes in the short and long term. In the pediatric athlete, repetitive stress on the hip perpetuates FAI and can drastically hinder performance. Hip arthroscopy allows for a high rate of return to sport with minimal morbidity in this population. Overall, pediatric hip arthroscopy is effective in treating FAI secondary to a wide variety of conditions. Despite its clinical benefits, patients and their families should be counseled regarding alternative treatments, potential complications, and return to play.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Screw Impingement and Associated Hip Pathology

Background

Screw impingement is an infrequently reported sequelae following in situ pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis, but it may result in significant bony and chondrolabral degeneration. Hip arthroscopy may offer the advantage of screw removal in a minimally invasive manner under direct visualization, as well as providing the opportunity for management of concomitant hip pathology.

Indications

A healthy, active 27-year-old woman with right hip dysfunction secondary to screw impingement and concomitant chondrolabral pathology following previous in situ pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Technique Description

The patient elected to undergo arthroscopic removal of hardware, osteochondroplasty, and management of hip labrum pathology. After the screw was localized, a 2.8-mm pin was inserted down the cannulated center of the screw to prevent intraarticular displacement during removal. The screw and washer were removed intact, and femoroplasty was performed to remove the reactive bone and resolve the cam-type impingement. Acetabuloplasty was then performed to remove pincer-type impingement and provide an appropriate rim of bone for labral reconstruction. The pathologic labrum was then debrided and reconstructed with a semitendinosus allograft.

Results

There were no immediate complications following surgery. Surgical management led to resolution of the patient's mechanical symptoms and provided pain relief, which allowed return to prior baseline level of function.

Discussion/Conclusion

Symptomatic screws that impinge the osteochondral and soft tissue anatomy of the hip require removal. Historically, these screws have been removed by open, mini-open, or percutaneous techniques. This case demonstrates the advantages of arthroscopic removal, as it affords the surgeon the ability to perform a dynamic examination, safely remove the screw, and directly visualize and manage concomitant hip pathology that may not be otherwise be recognizable. Further studies will be required to determine the ability of this technique to more clearly illustrate long-term improvement in function and prevention of the development of osteoarthritis.

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Osteochondroplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement Secondary to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Embase, PubMed (Medline), and Cochrane Library up to November 1, 2019. Data including patient demographics, slip severity according to Southwick, outcomes, and complications were retrieved from eligible studies that reported a minimum 3-month follow-up of arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for FAI secondary to SCFE. Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria was used to assess quality of studies. Heterogeneity and quality were evaluated using P values and the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Six studies (90 hips) were analyzed. The range of MINORS scores was 8 to 11. Most studies were level of evidence 4 (n = 4, 66.7%), with more men than women (n = 5, 83.3%). The ranges of age, body mass index, and follow-up length after surgery were 10 to 42 years, 17.5 to 32.3 kg/m2, and 3 to 56 months, respectively. The Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was the most commonly used score to report on clinical outcomes (n = 2 studies, 28 hips) with a significant improvement following surgery. Three studies reported an improvement in internal rotation (IR) of the hip with a range of improvement of 17° to 32°, with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0% and P = .531). Five studies reported a significant correction of the α angle, with range of improvement of 19.9° to 37.3°. The range of postoperative α angle was 32° to 67°, and 3 studies achieved appropriate postoperative α angle (40° to 50°), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 8.4% and P = .336). The total number of complications was 8 (1 major complication) and there were 6 revisions, with low heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for FAI secondary to SCFE provides good short- to medium-term outcomes and improves IR of the hip, with the ability to potentially correct the α angle with a low rate of complications and revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Does a History of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Patients Undergoing Femoroacetabular Osteoplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement Affect Outcomes Scores or Risk of Reoperation?

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can occur after slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) regardless of slip severity and even after in situ pinning. These patients represent a rare and unique demographic that is largely unreported on. It is important to further characterize the clinical presentation of these patients, associated treatment modalities, and the efficacy of these treatment modalities.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How do patients with post-SCFE FAI typically present in terms of radiographic and surgical findings? (2) How do their hip-specific and general-health outcomes scores after mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty compare with those obtained in a matched group of patients with FAI caused by other etiologies? (3) How do those groups compare in terms of the proportion who undergo conversion to THA?

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, 20 patients had femoroacetabular osteoplasty for post-SCFE FAI. During that time, general indications for this procedure were symptomatic FAI demonstrated on radiographs and physical exam. Of those, none was lost to follow-up before a minimum of 2 years, leaving all 20 available for matching, and all 20 had suitable matches in our database for patients who underwent femoroacetabular osteoplasty for other diagnoses. Matching was performed by surgeon, patient age, patient gender, and BMI. The matching group was drawn from a large database of patients who had the same procedure during the same period. We matched in a 1:3 ratio to arrive at 60 randomly selected control patients in this retrospective, comparative study. Patient demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, radiographic parameters, and intraoperative findings were compared between the two groups. At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, the latest clinical functional outcome scores (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr and SF-12) and proportions of conversion to THA were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A greater percentage of patients with a history of SCFE than those without prior SCFE demonstrated full chondral lesions intraoperatively (90% [18 of 20] versus 32% [19 of 60], odds ratio 7 [95% confidence interval 1 to 178]; p < 0.01). A greater percentage of patients with a history of SCFE also demonstrated labral calcifications intraoperatively compared with those without prior SCFE (65% [13 of 20] versus 35% [21 of 60], OR 3 [95% CI 1 to 10]; p = 0.04). Radiographically, patients with SCFE had greater preoperative alpha angles than did patients without SCFE (94° ± 13° versus 72° ± 22°; p = 0.01) as well as lower lateral center-edge angles (25° ± 8° versus 31° ± 8°; p = 0.04). There was no difference in postoperative follow-up between patients with a history of SCFE and patients without a history of SCFE (4 ± 2 years versus 4 ± 2 years; p = 0.32). There was no difference in the mean postoperative outcome scores between patients with a history of SCFE and patients without (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr: 75 ± 28 points versus 74 ± 17 points; p = 0.95; SF-12 physical score: 40 ± 11 points versus 39 ± 8 points; p = 0.79). There was no difference with the numbers available in the percentage of patients who underwent conversion to THA (15% [3 of 20] versus 12% [7 of 60], OR 1.36 [95% CI 0 to 6]; p = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

Patients with FAI after SCFE present with a greater degree of labral and chondral disease than do patients without a history of SCFE. However, at short-term follow-up, the proportion of patients who underwent conversion to THA and patients' postoperative outcome scores did not differ in this small, comparative series between patients with and without SCFE. Further evaluation with long-term follow-up is needed, especially given the more severe chondral damage we observed in patients with SCFE at the time of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

How Common Is Femoral Retroversion and How Is it Affected by Different Measurement Methods in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

BACKGROUND

Although femoral retroversion has been linked to the onset of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), and may result from a rotation of the femoral epiphysis around the epiphyseal tubercle leading to femoral retroversion, femoral version has rarely been described in patients with SCFE. Furthermore, the prevalence of actual femoral retroversion and the effect of different measurement methods on femoral version angles has yet to be studied in SCFE.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do femoral version and the prevalence of femoral retroversion differ between hips with SCFE and the asymptomatic contralateral side? (2) How do the mean femoral version angles and the prevalence of femoral retroversion change depending on the measurement method used? (3) What is the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of these measurement methods?

METHODS

For this retrospective, controlled, single-center study, we reviewed our institutional database for patients who were treated for unilateral SCFE and who had undergone a pelvic CT scan. During the period in question, the general indication for obtaining a CT scan was to define the surgical strategy based on the assessment of deformity severity in patients with newly diagnosed SCFE or with previous in situ fixation. After applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 79 patients. The mean age was 15 ± 4 years, 48% (38 of 79) of the patients were male, and 56% (44 of 79) were obese (defined as a BMI > 95th percentile (mean BMI 34 ± 9 kg/m2). One radiology resident (6 years of experience) measured femoral version of the entire study group using five different methods. Femoral neck version was measured as the orientation of the femoral neck. Further measurement methods included the femoral head's center and differed regarding the level of landmarks for the proximal femoral reference axis. From proximal to distal, this included the most-proximal methods (Lee et al. and Reikerås et al.) and most-distal methods (Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al.). Most proximally (Lee et al. method), we used the most cephalic junction of the greater trochanter as the landmark and, most distally, we used the center base of the femoral neck superior to the lesser trochanter (Murphy et al.). The orientation of the distal femoral condyles served as the distal reference axis for all five measurement methods. All five methods were compared side-by-side (involved versus uninvolved hip), and comparisons among all five methods were performed using paired t-tests. The prevalence of femoral retroversion (< 0°) was compared using a chi-square test. A subset of patients was measured twice by the first observer and by a second orthopaedic resident (2 years of experience) to assess intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability; for this assessment, we used intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The mean femoral neck version was lower in hips with SCFE than in the contralateral side (-2° ± 13° versus 7° ± 11°; p < 0.001). This yielded a mean side-by side difference of -8° ± 11° (95% CI -11° to -6°; p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of femoral retroversion in hips with SCFE (58% [95% CI 47% to 69%]; p < 0.001) than on the contralateral side (29% [95% CI 19% to 39%]). These differences between hips with SCFE and the contralateral side were higher and ranged from -17° ± 11° (95% CI -20° to -15°; p < 0.001) based on the method of Tomczak et al. to -22° ± 13° (95% CI -25° to -19°; p < 0.001) according to the method of Murphy et al. The mean overall femoral version angles increased for hips with SCFE using more-distal landmarks compared with more-proximal landmarks. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was higher in hips with SCFE for the proximal methods of Lee et al. and Reikerås et al. (91% [95% CI 85% to 97%] and 84% [95% CI 76% to 92%], respectively) than for the distal measurement methods of Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al. (47% [95% CI 36% to 58%] and 60% [95% CI 49% to 71%], respectively [all p < 0.001]). We detected mean differences ranging from -19° to 4° (all p < 0.005) for 8 of 10 pairwise comparisons in hips with SCFE. Among these, the greatest differences were between the most-proximal methods and the more-distal methods, with a mean difference of -19° ± 7° (95% CI -21° to -18°; p < 0.001), comparing the methods of Lee et al. and Tomczak et al. In hips with SCFE, we found excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, ICC 0.93 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.95 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods. Analogously, we found excellent agreement (ICC > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, range 0.91 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (range 0.89 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods in healthy contralateral hips.

CONCLUSION

We showed that femoral neck version is asymmetrically decreased in unilateral SCFE, and that differences increase when including the femoral head's center. Thus, to assess the full extent of an SCFE deformity, femoral version measurements should consider the position of the displaced epiphysis. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was high in patients with SCFE and increased when using proximal anatomic landmarks. Since the range of femoral version angles was wide, femoral version cannot be predicted in a given hip and must be assessed individually. Based on these findings, we believe it is worthwhile to add evaluation of femoral version to the diagnostic workup of children with SCFE. Doing so may better inform surgeons as they contemplate when to use isolated offset correction or to perform an additional femoral osteotomy for SCFE correction based on the severity of the slip and the rotational deformity. To facilitate communication among physicians and for the design of future studies, we recommend consistently reporting the applied measurement technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysiolysis: A Case Report

Slipped capital femoral epiphysiolysis (SCFE) may result in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) of the hip in up to one third of the cases. Residual deformity of the cam-type, or “pistol-grip”, is associated with chondrolabral injury, resulting in pain, functional disability, and early osteoarthritis. The arthroscopic treatment with osteochondroplasty proved to be beneficial in a selected case of FAI secondary to SCFE.

Hip arthroscopy following slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation: chondral damage and labral tears findings

PURPOSE

This study investigated the association between chondrolabral damage and time to arthroscopic surgery for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

METHODS

This was a descriptive retrospective study that enrolled patients with SCFE who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoral osteochondroplasty after SCFE fixation. SCFE type, time from SCFE symptom onset or slip fixation surgery to hip arthroscopy and intraarticular arthroscopic findings were recorded. Acetabular chondrolabral damage was evaluated according to the Konan and Outerbridge classification systems. Nested analysis of variance and the chi-squared test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

We analyzed 22 cases of SCFE in 17 patients (five bilateral). The mean age at the time of hip arthroscopy was 13.6 years-old (8-20), and mean time from SCFE fixation to arthroscopy was 25.1 months (3 weeks to 8 years). Labral frying was present in 20 cases, labral tears in 16 and acetabular chondral damage in 17. The most frequent lesion was type 3 (41%) (Konan classification). Two cases had a grade III and 1 had a grade II acetabular chondral lesion (Outerbridge classification). Positive associations were observed between time from SCFE to hip arthroscopy and hip intraarticular lesions evaluated using Konan (p = 0.004) and Outerbridge (p = 0.000) classification systems. There was no association between SCFE severity (chi-squared = 0.315), stability (chi-squared = 0.558) or temporality (chi-squared = 0.145) type and hip intraarticular lesions.

CONCLUSION

A longer time from SCFE symptom onset and fixation to hip arthroscopy is associated with greater acetabular chondrolabral damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Extracorporal shock wave therapy for the treatment of arthrodesis non-unions

INTRODUCTION

Non-union is a regular complication of arthrodeses. Standard treatment includes revision surgery with frequent need for re-revision due to persistent non-union. Particularly patients with concomitant diseases are at risk of secondary complications. There is a need for evaluation of alternative treatment options. The aim of this study is to provide first evidence on union-rate and pain course after focussed extracorporeal shock-wave therapy of arthrodesis non-unions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective single-centre study, 25 patients with non-union following arthrodesis received one session of focussed extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (energy flux density 0.36 mJ/mm², 3000 impulses, 23 kV, 4 Hz). Radiographic and clinical results were recorded 6, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

24 patients were followed-up. After 24 weeks arthrodeses of the hand healed in 80%, of the upper ankle in 50%, of subtalar joint in 27.2% and of the midfoot in 0% of the cases. Pain decreased from 4.8 (± 2.8) points on the visual analogue scale to 3.4 (± 2.3), 2.9 (± 2.5) and 2.4 (± 2.8) points after 6, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that the effect of focussed, high-energy shock wave therapy depends on body region and is effective for the treatment of non-unions of the hand as well as for pain relief.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Causes of Delayed Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Importance of the Frog Lateral Pelvis Projection

Delayed diagnosis and treatment is a universally reported problem that impairs the prognosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Quite frequently, a delayed diagnosis of SCFE is observed in spite of serial admissions and examinations of the limping adolescent. Why do health professionals globally fail to make a definitive diagnosis of SCFE during the first examination of the patient? A retrospective study of 36 adolescents treated for stable SCFE and two adolescents treated for unstable SCFE has been performed. In more than half of the delayed diagnosed stable slips (13/25, 52%), the diagnosis was set after serial examinations of the patient. Health professionals commonly order only the anteroposterior (AP) X-ray view of the pelvis when examining a non-traumatic limping adolescent. The frog lateral (FL) projection is usually spared in an attempt to limit the radiation exposure of the patient, especially in ambulating adolescents with mild symptoms. It is proposed that in the non-traumatic limping adolescent, the FL projection instead of the AP pelvis view should be requested by the health professional in order to timely diagnose a surgical emergency of the adolescent hip such as SCFE.

Surgical treatment of symptomatic post-slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity: a comparative study between hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation with or without intertrochanteric osteotomy

PURPOSE

Our primary research question was to investigate the severity of deformity and articular damage as well as outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy compared with open surgery for the treatment of symptomatic slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) deformity.

METHODS

Retrospective review of surgical treatment of symptomatic SCFE deformity with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups: the arthroscopic group, surgical hip dislocation(SHD) group and SHD with femoral osteotomy (SHD+ITO) group. Deformity severity was quantified. Hip outcome was assessed by the modified Merle d'Aubigné Postel (MDP) scores.

RESULTS

There were more severe slips treated by SHD and SHD+ITO. There was more severe deformity in the SHD+ITO group than the arthroscopy group (p < 0.001). There were more full thickness acetabular cartilage defects in the SHD and the SHD+ITO groups (> 40%) compared with the arthroscopy group (11%; p = 0.03). The SHD+ITO and SHD group had lower MDP scores compared with the arthroscopy group both before and after surgery but no difference was detected in the amount of improvement from surgery across groups (p > 0.05). Moderate and severe SCFEs had worse preoperative scores but improvement was not different compared with mild SCFEs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing open treatment had more severe SCFE deformity with more extensive articular damage at reconstructive surgery compared with patients undergoing arthroscopy. All groups with SCFE deformity had improved pain and hip function postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Outside-In Technique for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Safe and Reproducible Approach in Hip Arthroscopy

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome caused by slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can be successfully treated arthroscopically and with the minimally invasive, outside-in surgical technique. The advantages of the technique are that the residual cam-type deformity caused by the slippage can be corrected and reconstructed reliably and reproducibly before distracting the hip joint; and radiation with fluoroscopy is used for only definitive reduction and reconstruction, which is obtained with cannulated screws. In addition, this safe technique allows distraction of the hip after screw placement, without affecting the reconstruction, to address labral tears and chondrolabral delaminations caused by the impingement.

Factors Affecting Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a frequent cause of nontraumatic painful hip of the adolescence. It is the result of the separation of the proximal femoral growth cartilage at the level of the hypertrophic cell zone. The femoral neck metaphysis rotates externally and migrates proximally relative to the femoral head epiphysis, which is stably seated in the acetabulum; early diagnosis and in situ stabilization grants the best long term results. Numerous factors affect treatment outcomes. Not all implants have the same effect on the slipped physis. Application of the traditionally used implants, such as non-threaded pins and cannulated screws, is questioned. Modern implants are available, which stabilize the slip without accelerating physis fusion. This allows femoral head and neck growth and remodeling to limit the post-slip sequellae on hip anatomy and function. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) complicates almost all slips. It causes progressive labral and articular cartilage damage and leads to early hip osteoarthritis and total hip replacement, approximately ten years earlier compared to the general population. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a dramatic complication, seen almost exclusively in unstable slips. It develops within months after the slip and leads to immediate articular joint degeneration and the need for total hip replacement. Another serious complication of SCFE is chondrolysis, which is a rapid progressive articular cartilage degeneration leading to a narrow joint space and restriction of hip motion. Implant-related complications, such as migration and loosening, may lead to the progression of the slip. Though bilateral disease is quite frequent, there is no consensus about the need for preventive surgery on the healthy contralateral hip. Diagnosis of SCFE is frequently missed or delayed, leading to slips of higher severity. Silent slippage of the capital femoral epiphysis is highly suspected as an underlying cause of cam-type FAI and early-onset hip osteoarthritis. There is controversy, whether asymptomatic implants should be removed. Novel surgical techniques, such as the modified Dunn procedure and hip arthroscopy, seem to be effective modalities for the prevention of FAI in SCFE.

Treatment for Post-Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Deformity

In situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a safe and effective treatment modality, but often results in residual deformity leading to femoroacetabular impingement, which may limit patient activities and predispose to early onset arthritis. Enhanced understanding of the implications of femoroacetabular impingement and new surgical techniques have prompted interest in treating post-slipped capital femoral epiphysis deformity to both improve current symptoms and delay or prevent hip arthrosis.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Depth of Resection During Femoral Neck Osteoplasty for Anterior Impingement Following Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement as a result of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been treated traditionally with a proximal femoral osteotomy, but open and arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty is becoming increasingly popular. Cam lesions result from excess bone primarily at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction. SCFEs result from posterior and inferior slippage of the femoral epiphysis, causing the metaphysis to move anteriorly. This study's purpose was to compare fourth-generation sawbones standard femurs with SCFE femurs to determine whether bone resection from the anterior metaphysis results in similar biomechanical properties.

METHODS

A custom fourth-generation composite SCFE sawbone was created with a 30-degree slip angle. Control group consisted of fourth-generation composite standard nondeformed medium femurs. The femoral neck at the head-neck junction was divided into 4 quadrants. All resections were done in the anterolateral quadrant. Twenty SCFE sawbones and 20 standard sawbones were divided into 4 subgroups based on resection depths of 0%, 10%, 30%, and 50% of the metaphysis at the head-neck junction. After resection, all proximal femurs were loaded to failure in an Instron testing machine to determine the ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and energy to failure.

RESULTS

The standard femurs were significantly stronger than the SCFE femurs (P<0.001) and the strength of the femurs decreased significantly as the resection amount increased (P<0.001). Similarly, the standard femurs withstood significantly more energy before failing than the SCFE femurs (P<0.001) and the energy to failure decreased significantly with varying resection amounts (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SCFE femurs demonstrate a significant reduction in strength and energy to failure after osteoplasty compared with nondeformed femurs in a sawbone model. Strength and energy to failure are inversely proportional to the depth of bone resection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Aggressive femoral neck osteoplasty for treatment of a SCFE deformity may lead to increased risk of fracture. Further studies are necessary to determine the safe depth of resection in a clinical setting.

Patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by the modified Dunn procedure have low rates of avascular necrosis, good outcomes, and little osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up

AIMS

The modified Dunn procedure has the potential to restore the anatomy in hips with severe slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE). However, there is a risk of developing avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN). In this paper, we report on clinical outcome, radiological outcome, AVN rate and complications, and the cumulative survivorship at long-term follow-up in patients undergoing the modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis involving 46 hips in 46 patients treated with a modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE (slip angle > 60°) between 1999 and 2016. At nine-year-follow-up, 40 hips were available for clinical and radiological examination. Mean preoperative age was 13 years, and 14 hips (30%) presented with unstable slips. Mean preoperative slip angle was 64°. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was calculated.

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up, the mean Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score was 17 points (14 to 18), mean modified Harris Hip Score was 94 points (66 to 100), and mean Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was 91 points (67 to 100). Postoperative slip angle was 7° (1° to 16°). One hip (2%) had progression of osteoarthritis (OA). Two hips (5%) developed AVN of the femoral head and required further surgery. Three other hips (7%) underwent implant revision due to screw breakage or change of wires. Cumulative survivorship was 86% at ten-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE resulted in a low rate of AVN, low risk of progression to OA, and high functional scores at long-term follow-up. The slip deformities were mainly corrected but secondary impingement deformities can develop in some hips and may require further surgical treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:403-414.

Moderate and severe SCFE (Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis) arthroscopic osteoplasty vs open neck osteotomy-a retrospective analysis of results

AIM

We intend to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic osteoplasty with open neck osteotomy for correction of the hip impingement and improvement of hip function in children with moderate to severe healed Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE). Our aim is to verify if arthroscopic osteoplasty could achieve the same outcome as open procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the hospital hip database retrieved 187 cases of SCFE from 2006 to 2013. We found 12 patients underwent open neck osteotomy and deformity correction for moderate/ severe healed SCFE and ten underwent arthroscopic osteoplasty of the hip. We compared the outcomes between these groups.

RESULTS

In the arthroscopy cohort, the mean age at surgery was 15.8 years (range 13-19 years) and mean follow-up was 46.1 months (range 33-66 months). In the neck osteotomy group, the mean age at surgery was 14.6 years (11-20 years) and mean duration of follow-up was 49 months (36-60 months). The outcomes in arthroscopic osteoplasty group vs. open neck osteotomy were as follows: antero-posterior (AP) slip angle 9.2° (0.3°- 28.8°) vs 10.8° (1°-17.9°) (p = 0.0003), lateral slip angle 44.8° (36.5°-64.2°) vs 13.5° (1°-28.5°) (p = 0.00001), oblique plane deformity 47.1° (40.2°-53.5°) vs 16.7° (1°-28.6°) (p = 0.0003), alpha angle 61.88° (52.1°-123°) vs.34.6° (23.2°-45.6°) (p = 0.0003), anterior offset 0 mm (0 mm-2 mm) vs. 5 mm (2-13 mm) (p = 0.0003), modified Harris hip score (MHHS) 75.5 (58.75-96.8) vs. 90 (86.2-99) (p = 0.003), non-arthroplasty hip score (NAHS) 67.12 (18.75-100) vs. 92.1 (81.25-100) (p = 0.002), internal rotation 20° (0-20°) vs. 50° (30°-70°) (p = 0.0002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Even though the radiographic correction lagged behind in the arthroscopic group, the functional outcomes achieved did convey the gain of function in this cohort. In carefully selected cases, arthroscopy could be a less invasive procedure which has desirable outcomes.

Outcome of pinning in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: risk factors associated with avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and femoral impingement

Objective This study aimed to assess the principal risk factors that could lead to the most common long-term complications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, such as avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and hip impingement. Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study and evaluated patients (70 patients, 81 hips) who were treated for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 2010 to 2015 and who underwent pinning. We measured the severity of displacement radiologically using the Southwick angle. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for the most frequent long-term complications of avascular necrosis (AVN), chondrolysis, and femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). Results We found seven cases of AVN, 14 cases of chondrolysis, and 31 hips had an α angle of 60°. Sex, ambulation, and symptoms did not affect development of these complications. Patients with a normal weight were almost two times more likely to develop FAI. Patients with moderate and severe slips had a similar percentage of AVN. In severe slips, 85.7% of patients had an α angle higher than 60°. Conclusions This study shows that severe slips have a higher risk of developing AVN and hip impingement. Every patient who suffers from SCFE (even the mildest forms) should be regularly checked for FAI.

The natural alpha angle of the femoral head-neck junction

Aims

Asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction is common in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and usually quantified using the alpha angle on radiographs or MRI. The aim of this study was to determine the natural alpha angle in a large cohort of patients by continuous circumferential analysis with CT.

Methods

CT scans of 1312 femurs of 656 patients were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. There were 362 men and 294 women. Their mean age was 61.2 years (18 to 93). All scans had been performed for reasons other than hip disease. Digital circumferential analysis allowed continuous determination of the alpha angle around the entire head-neck junction. All statistical tests were conducted two-sided; a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean maximum alpha angle for the cohort was 59.0° (sd 9.4). The maximum was located anterosuperiorly at 01:36 on the clock face, with two additional maxima of asphericity at the posterior and inferior head-neck junction. The mean alpha angle was significantly larger in men (59.4°, sd 8.0) compared with women (53.5°, sd 7.4°; p = 0.0005), and in Caucasians (60.7°, sd 9.0°) compared with Africans (56.3°, sd 8.0; p = 0.007) and Asians (50.8°, sd 7.2; p = 0.0005). The alpha angle showed a weak positive correlation with age (p < 0.05). If measured at commonly used planes of the radially reconstructed CT or MRI, the alpha angle was largely underestimated; measurement at the 01:30 and 02:00 positions showed a mean underestimation of 4° and 6°, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides important data on the normal alpha angle dependent on age, gender, and ethnic origin. The normal alpha angle in men is > 55°, and this should be borne in mind when making a diagnosis of cam-type morphology. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:570–8.

Persisting CAM deformity is associated with early cartilage degeneration after Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: 11-year follow-up including dGEMRIC

OBJECTIVE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in adolescence is associated with increased risk of future osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to study clinical and radiographic risk factors for early cartilage degeneration after SCFE.

DESIGN

22 patients (44 hips) (mean age 24 years, range 18-27) treated with in situ fixation (The Hansson hook-pin) for stable SCFE on average 11 years previously were investigated. Cartilage status was assessed with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC). The alpha angle, reflecting femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and the original slip angle were measured. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS) and clinical examination.

RESULTS

The dGEMRIC index was lower in SCFE hips than unaffected hips 456 ms (CI 419-493) vs 521 ms (CI 476-567) (P = 0.03). The difference was larger (mean 21 ms) in anterior than posterior regions of the hip (P = 0.038). The alpha angle was higher in SCFE hips, 61.5° (CI 53.9-69.1) vs 45.6° (CI 43.6-47.6), (P < 0.001). The alpha angle, but not the original slip angle, correlated negatively with the dGEMRIC index (R = -0.40, P = 0.046). There was a positive correlation between HAGOS and the dGEMRIC-index (R = 0.41, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Early cartilage degeneration after SCFE seems related to persisting FAI in adulthood, rather than the initial slip severity. The correlation between dGEMRIC and HAGOS indicates a clinical relevance of the MRI findings. Our results suggest that FAI after SCFE should be evaluated already after physeal closure in order to predict and possibly prevent future OA development.

Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement after slipped capital femoral epiphysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) post slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) may lead to degenerative changes on the hip. We have reviewed the current procedures in the literature, aiming to correct the SCFE to prevent FAI and the ones that treat FAI post SCFE.

RECENT FINDINGS

The trends of managing moderated or severe SCFE is to correct the displacement by reduction and fixation with articular hematoma decompression in unstable hips and Dunn modified procedure even for unstable and stable situations. However, after FAI is settled, the options are osteochondroplasty by arthroscopy or surgical hip dislocation, associated or not to subtrocanteric osteotomy.

SUMMARY

Femoroacetabular impingement may occur in mild slips and certainly occur in cases of moderate and severe slips. The initial management depends on the severity and the stability of the slip.The modified Dunn procedure is a good option for the treatment of unstable SCFEs. Gentle closed reduction with capsulotomy (Parsch) may be considered whenever the surgeon is not comfortable with the modified Dunn procedure.Hips with open physis and stable moderate or severe SCFE, the modified Dunn procedure can be indicated. Cases with closed physis are managed with intertrochanteric osteotomy combined with osteoplasty.In the presence of symptomatic FAI secondary to SCFE, one should consider arthroscopic osteoplasty or surgical hip dislocation (with or without osteotomies) as treatment options.

Complications following arthroscopic surgery of the hip: a systematic review of 36 761 cases

AIMS

The number of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the hip has increased significantly during the past decade. It has now become an established technique for the treatment of many intra- and extra-articular conditions affecting the hip. However, it has a steep learning curve and is not without the risk of complications. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of complications during and following this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in designing this study. Two reviewers systematically searched the literature for complications related to arthroscopy of the hip. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Pertinent data were abstracted and analysed.

RESULTS

We found 276 relevant studies with a total of 36 761 arthroscopies that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 36.7 years (1.7 to 70) and the mean body mass index was 25.7 kg/m² (20.2 to 29.2). Femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears were the most common indications for the procedure. The total number of complications was 1222 (3.3%). Nerve injury (0.9%), mainly involving the pudendal and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves, and iatrogenic chondral and labral injury (0.7%), were the two most common complications. There were 58 major complications (0.2%), the most common being intra-abdominal extravasation of fluid, which was found in 13 cases (0.04%). There were three deaths (0.008%).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic surgery of the hip is a procedure with a relatively low rate of complications, although some may be significant in this young cohort of patients. This study relied on the reported complications only and the results should be interpreted with caution. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1577-83.

Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A systematic review

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existing literature from 2005 to 2016 reporting on the efficacy of surgical management of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) secondary to slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

Methods

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched and screened in duplicate. Data such as patient demographics, surgical technique, surgical outcomes and complications were retrieved from eligible studies.

Results

Fifteen eligible level IV studies were included in this review comprising 261 patients (266 hips). Treatment groups included arthroscopic osteochondroplasty, surgical hip dislocation, and traditional open osteotomy. The mean alpha angle corrections were 32.14° (standard deviation (sd) 7.02°), 41.45° (sd 10.5°) and 6.0° (sd 5.21°), for arthroscopy, surgical hip dislocation, and open osteotomy groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Each group demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes across their respective scoring systems. Major complication rates were 1.6%, 10.7%, and 6.7%, for arthroscopy, surgical dislocation and osteotomy treatments, respectively.

Conclusion

In the context of SCFE-related FAI, surgical hip dislocation demonstrated improved correction of the alpha angle, albeit at higher complication and revision rates than both arthroscopic and open osteotomy treatments. Further investigation, including high-quality trials with standardised radiological and clinical outcome measures for young patients, is warranted to clarify treatment approaches and safety.

Cite this article: K. O. Oduwole, D. de Sa, J. Kay, F. Findakli, A. Duong, N. Simunovic, Y. Yi-Meng, O. R. Ayeni. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement following slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:472–480. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2017-0018.R1.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of management in the hip impingement era

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains the most common adolescent hip disorder. Most cases present with stable slips, and in situ fixation is the most commonly adopted treatment worldwide. The introduction of the concept of femoroacetabular impingement and subsequent studies have revealed SCFE-related hip impingement to be a significant pre-arthritic condition, and the previously suggested remodeling of the proximal femur after in situ fixation has been called into question. Complex proximal femoral osteotomies and more recently intra-articular procedures via surgical hip dislocation have been employed. The literature is still lacking a strong evidence to undertake such aggressive procedures. Moreover, the application of a particular procedure regarding the nature of the slip, being stable or unstable, the degree of the slip, and the condition of the physis has not been extensively described in the literature. The purpose of this article is to outline the SCFE-related hip impingement, to review the best evidence for the current treatment options for both stable and unstable slips, and to develop an algorithm for decision making.