Radiographic failure and rates of re-operation after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparison of surgical techniques

Fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case series

Background

Suture anchors have been used in surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. While some reports indicate favorable results, others emphasize less promising outcomes. This case series reports our experience with suture anchors for surgical treatment of ACJ dislocation.

Methods

Clinical and radiographic outcomes in three patients treated operatively for ACJ dislocations were reviewed. In all patients, two suture anchors were inserted in the coracoid (unicortical) and #5 nonabsorbable suture from the suture anchor was shuttled through drill holes in the clavicle and tied over two button devices. The coracoclavicular ligaments were reconstructed using a figure of eight semitendinosus allograft around the coracoid and clavicle. Postoperatively, sling immobilization was used for 6 weeks, and physical therapy was initiated at 6 weeks with contact activity allowed at 6 months.

Results

Three male patients underwent treatment for Rockwood type 3 (chronic; n = 1) and type 5 (n = 2) ACJ dislocations. Loss of reduction was noted within 6 weeks postoperatively. Two patients exhibited failure due to complete suture anchor pullout and the third patient had partial pull out of one of the anchors. Additionally, the third patient also suffered a coracoid fracture adjacent to the anchor's placement after sustaining direct trauma to his shoulder, one-year postoperatively.

Conclusion

In our case series, we found a high rate of fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for the treatment of ACJ dislocation. These findings should be taken into consideration when selecting an appropriate implant for fixation of ACJ dislocation.

Clavicular tunnel widening in chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities after primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization

Purpose

To evaluate joint reduction (loss of reduction [LOR]; dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) in patients treated with arthroscopically-assisted acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment.

Methods

Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization (bidirectional tendon allograft with a low-profile TightRope) after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment were included retrospectively. Bilateral anteroposterior stress views served for evaluating LOR (side-comparative coracoclavicular distance [CCD]) and cTW at a 6-weeks- and 6-months-follow-up (FU) and for evaluating the filling ratio (FR, vertical device insertion depth relative to clavicle height) at the 6-weeks-FU. Postoperative DPT was assessed on Alexander's views.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (20 male, mean age 46.1 ± 14.8 years) were included (prior treatment: nonoperative: n = 15; surgical: n = 12). There were no differences in LOR, DPT or cTW between groups postoperatively. Initial CCD-symmetry at the 6-weeks-FU (CCD: -0.1 mm [95% confidence interval, CI, -2 to 1.4 mm]) was followed by LOR at the 6-months-FU (CCD: -3.5 mm [95% CI, -5.2 to -1.9 mm]; p < 0.001). cTW increased towards the inferior cortex, compared to the superior cortex and the intermediate level (p < 0.001, respectively). cTW at the inferior cortex was associated with more LOR (r = -0.449; p = 0.024) and DPT (r = 0.421; p = 0.036), dependent on a smaller FR (r = -0.430; p = 0.032).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization for chronic bidirectional ACJ instabilities showed comparable radiologic results after previous nonoperative versus surgical treatment. cTW increased towards the inferior cortex and was associated with recurrent vertical and horizontal instability, related to a smaller FR. More research into reduced cTW, for example, by a more filling device, should be performed.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Current trends in surgical treatment of the acromioclavicular joint injuries in 2023: a review of the literature

Background

This article examines the wide range of surgical reconstruction options available for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, the lack of consensus regarding the most suitable surgical techniques is attributed to the high and variable failure rates observed with current approaches.

Methods

This article presents a comprehensive overview of the current surgical principles and techniques used by renowned experts in the field of AC shoulder injury management.

Results

It emphasizes the significance of addressing horizontal and rotational instability in AC injuries and highlights the impact of impaired scapular biomechanics.

Conclusion

By exploring these emerging concepts and strategies, the article aims to lay the foundation for future studies aimed at improving treatment outcomes and patient management.

Surgical Pearls and Pitfalls for Anatomic Acromioclavicular/Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common shoulder injuries in contact/collision athletes. There are a number of different surgical options that can be used to treat these injuries. The majority of these injuries can be treated nonoperatively with an early return to play for type I and II injuries. Surgical intervention and AC/CC (coracoclavicular) ligament reconstruction have excellent postoperative outcomes if complications can be avoided. This review will focus on the pearls and pitfalls for anatomic AC and CC ligament reconstruction for high-grade AC joint injuries.

Complications after operative treatment of high-grade acromioclavicular injuries

BACKGROUND

Treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries remains controversial. Numerous reconstruction techniques have been proposed. The purpose of this study was to describe the complication profile in a large cohort of patients who underwent surgical management of AC joint separations using a variety of reconstruction strategies.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgery for AC joint injuries from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution were identified. Chart review was performed to capture patient demographics, radiographic measurements, operative techniques, postoperative complications, and revision surgery. Structural failure was defined as a radiographic loss of reduction of greater than 50% when comparing immediate and final postoperative imaging. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complications and revision surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 279 patients included in the study, 66 (24%) had type III separations, 20 (7%) type IV, and 193 (69%) type V. Fifty-three percent underwent surgery acutely (<6 weeks of injury), and 40% were chronic (>3 months). A total of 252 of the 279 surgeries (90%) were performed open and 27 (10%) were arthroscopically assisted. Allograft was used in 164 of 279 (59%) cases. Specific operative techniques (with or without allograft) included hook plating (1%), modified Weaver Dunn (16%), cortical button fixation (18%), and suture fixation (65%). At mean 28-week follow-up, 108 complications were identified in 97 patients (35%). Complications were identified at mean 20 ± 21 weeks. Sixty-nine structural failures (25%) were identified. Persistent AC joint pain requiring injection, clavicle fracture, adhesive capsulitis, and hardware complications were the other most common complications. Twenty-one patients (8%) underwent unplanned revision surgery at mean 38 ± 28 weeks after the index procedure, with the most common indication for structural failure, hardware complications, or fracture of the clavicle or coracoid. Patients who had surgery after 6 weeks from injury had a significantly greater risk of having a complication (odds ratio [OR] 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-7.77, P = .009) and a significantly greater risk of having structural failure (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.38-5.28, P = .004). Patients who had an arthroscopic technique had a greater risk of structural failure (P = .002). Complications, structural failure, and revision surgery were not significantly correlated with use of allograft or specific operative techniques.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of AC joint injuries is associated with a relatively high complication profile. Loss of reduction in the postoperative period is common. However, the revision surgery rate is low. These findings are important for patient preoperative counseling.

Anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization with chemically sterilized tendon allografts: A retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze whether chemically sterilized tendon allografts perform as well as other non-sterilized allografts and autografts as described in the literature for anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization for the treatment of Rockwood III-V. Allografts are still described as a factor for higher re-rupture rates.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 21 acromioclavicular joint stabilizations performed by a single surgeon and performed between 2011 and 2014 using sterilized semitendinosus allografts. The primary endpoints were re-rupture and complication rates. Secondary endpoints were AC-joint stability, pain level, return to work and sport and the range of motion.

Results

No re-ruptures occurred during the mean follow-up time of 33 months. Zero complications occurred directly after surgery, but three complications later than three weeks after surgery. All cases resolved without further surgery. After surgery, stability significantly improved for all patients. Post-surgery, 19 patients had stable acromioclavicular joints and only two patients showed minor instabilities. Range of motion returned to the range of the healthy shoulders for all patients.

Conclusion

Chemically sterilized semitendinosus allograft use for anatomic AC-joint stabilization is equivalent to the use of other allografts or autografts and required no hardware removal. No donor age or graft size dependence was observed, due to zero re-ruptures.

Subject-specific computational modeling of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments

BACKGROUND

Disruption of the acromioclavicular joint is a common injury. Despite the different surgical procedures described for treating this injury, complications such as loss of reduction and failure of fixation remain unacceptably high. We developed a computer model of the acromioclavicular joint to better understand the biomechanical contributions of the ligaments that are typically injured.

METHODS

Six fresh frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tested on an AMTI VIVO 6-degree of freedom test platform to measure force-displacement in inferior translation, anteroposterior translation, and internal rotation before and after sequentially transecting the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. These data were used to construct computer models of each specimen. Three-dimensional computed tomographic scans were used to generate a rigid-body dynamics model using the AnyBody Modeling System. The scapula and clavicle were connected by the acromioclavicular joint capsule, the conoid ligament, and the trapezoid ligament. Subject-specific ligament properties were calculated by matching computer predictions to experimental force-displacement data.

RESULTS

The calculated free lengths of the conoid, trapezoid, and acromioclavicular ligaments were 13.5 (±3.2), 11.8 (±2.4), and 11.0 (±2.7) mm, respectively. The calculated stiffnesses of the conoid, trapezoid, and acromioclavicular ligaments were 34.3 (±6.3), 28.4 (±3.2), and 33.8 (±8.2) N/mm, respectively. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) of predicted force-displacement curves relative to experimental force-displacement curves (during inferior and anteroposterior translation) was less than 1 mm. For validation of subject-specific models, after ligament properties were calculated, the RMSD of the predicted torque over 15° of internal rotation was 12% of maximum rotational torque (average for 6 specimens).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Acromioclavicular disruption results in multidirectional instability, which requires careful consideration of the individual contributions of the injured ligaments. In addition, variations in patient anatomy can significantly affect the biomechanical stability of the reconstruction. Subject-specific models can enhance our understanding of the individual and collective biomechanical contributions of the injured soft tissues to the multiaxial stability of the acromioclavicular joint. These models may also be useful for analyzing and assessing biomechanical stability after various types of surgical reconstruction.

Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopy-assisted cortical fixation devices have been increasingly used in the operative management of both acute and chronic cases of acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI). It has been hypothesized that delayed surgical management leads to inferior clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to acute treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes, scapula dyskinesia, and failure or revision rates of arthroscopically treated acute and chronic ACJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included all surgically treated patients with grade IIIb and V chronic ACJI between 2013 and 2017, matched 1:1 to a group of acute grade IIIb and V ACJI patients treated during the same time period. Chronic ACJI was defined as delayed surgical treatment >21 days after injury. Chronic cases received an additional hamstring autograft next to the suture pulley systems. Follow-up was obtained at an average of 3.2 years (range: 1.4-6.2). Clinical outcome scores included the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TF), Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), ACJI Score, Sick Scapula Score (SSS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, and the visual analog scale pain score. Radiologic follow-up was obtained pre- and postoperatively and at final follow-up. The 2-year results were compared to the results of a 1:1 matched-pair group comprising patients who were treated with an acute ACJI during the same period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (80.5%) of 41 chronic ACJI cases were available for follow-up and were compared with 33 matched-pair cases of acute ACJI (of 41). The clinical scores were significantly better in the acute cohort for the CMS (92 ± 8 vs. 88 ± 8, P = .030), ASES (91 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13, P = .002), SSS (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.5, P = .0004), NCS (86 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 13, P = .049), TF (9.9 ± 1.9 vs. 9.0 ± 2.1, P = .030), and ACJI (83 ± 13 vs. 75 ± 1, P = .003). In contrast to the chronic cohort, the acute cohort illustrated a significant loss of reduction at follow-up (P = .020).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, early arthroscopy-assisted operative treatment of grade IIIb and V ACJIs seems superior to delayed surgical intervention of grade IIIb and V ACJIs. Furthermore, an additional autograft loop leads to less loss of reduction compared with suture pulley/suspensory loop fixation standalones.

Delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a modern suspensory device does not increase the risk of fixation failure or major complications

BACKGROUND

Management of displaced acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remains contentious. It is unclear if delayed vs. acute reconstruction has an increased risk of fixation failure and complications. The primary aim of this study was to compare complications of early vs. delayed reconstruction. The secondary aim was to determine modes of failure of ACJ reconstruction requiring revision surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all patients who underwent operative reconstruction of ACJ injuries over a 10-year period (Rockwood III-V) using suspensory devices with or without hamstring allograft. Reconstruction was classed as early (<12 weeks from injury) or delayed (≥12 weeks). Patient demographics, fixation method, and postoperative complications were noted, with 1-year follow-up a minimum requirement for inclusion. Patient-reported outcomes with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and EuroQol-5 Dimension were undertaken. Fixation failure was defined as loss of reduction requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were analyzed (n = 59 early and n = 45 delayed). The mean age was 42.0 (standard deviation: 11.2; 17-70 years); 84.6% were male and 15.4% were smokers. No difference was observed between fixation failure (P = .39) or deep infection (P = .13) with regard to acute vs. delayed reconstruction. No patient demographic or timing of surgery was predictive of fixation failure on regression modeling. Overall, 11 patients underwent revision surgery for loss of reduction and implant failure (n = 5 suture fatigue, n = 2 endobutton escape, n = 2 coracoid stress fracture, and n = 2 deep infection). The EuroQol-5 Dimension (P = .084) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (P = .062) were comparable for early and delayed groups respectively and below the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

This study found that delayed surgical management of ACJ injuries using a modern device has comparable functional outcomes and is not associated with a higher incidence of fixation failure or major complications.

Early loss of radiographic reduction after acute acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: Comparison of open Double Endobutton fixation vs. Nottingham Surgilig

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment is usually recommended for the acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Among the wide variety of different surgical techniques, the Double Endobutton and the Nottingham Surgilig technique are two of the most widely acceptable and well described techniques. The aim of this study was to offer a direct comparison of the above techniques in question, analysing the patients outcomes and assessing the risk of early loss of radiographic reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 48 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients were categorised in two groups (Endobutton and Nottingham Surgilig group) and post operative assessment of the patients was performed using the Oxford Shoulder (OSS) and Constant Murley (CMS) scores. Patient demographics, hand dominance, ACJ classification and co-morbidities were included in the analysis and radiographic evaluation was conducted for both groups.

RESULTS

Both techniques provide a good outcome in the management of unstable ACJ dislocations but the risk of early radiographic failure remains higher in the double Endobutton technique (26% vs. 17.39% for the Nottingham Surgilig group). Factors such as patients' demographics, hand dominance, co-morbidities and grade of ACJ separation do not seem to contribute to radiographic loss of reduction, whereas the incorrect positioning of the coracoid endobutton is a significant factor predisposing to early radiographic failure, P < 0.001.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of early loss of radiographic reduction still remains high in both groups. In order to reduce this common complication, accurate placement of the coracoid endobutton under fluoroscopic intra-operative control is strongly recommended.

Treatment of Failed Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstructions: Primary Acromioclavicular Ligament and Capsular Reconstruction and Revision Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a common injury affecting 2 of every 10,000 people in the general population and comprise 9% to 12% of all injuries to the shoulder. Most injuries occur through contact activity, which drives the acromion inferiorly with the clavicle remaining in its anatomic position, initiating a cascade of injury propagating from the AC ligament followed by failure of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Many techniques have been described for AC joint injuries, without a consensus gold standard. The revision setting offers even less consensus on treatment options and countless difficulties for surgeons. There have been more than 60 described procedures regarding AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions, with significant controversy regarding the optimal intervention for each injury. When these techniques fail, it is important to pinpoint the mechanism of failure to construct a successful plan for revision. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred method of primary AC and revision coracoclavicular reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft semitendinosus as well as TightRope fixation.

Combination of Surgical Techniques Restores Multidirectional Biomechanical Stability of Acromioclavicular Joint

PURPOSE

To measure the multiaxial stability of the acromioclavicular joint before and after transection of the acromioclavicular capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments and after sequential repair of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.

METHODS

Biomechanical testing was performed on fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (N = 6). Translational and rotational stability in the vertical and horizontal planes was measured in intact specimens, after transecting the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments, and after sequentially performing the following procedures: single-bundle coracoclavicular repair (CCR), modified Weaver-Dunn procedure (WD), and acromioclavicular stabilization (ACS).

RESULTS

Resecting the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular significantly reduced translational stiffness in the inferior and anteroposterior directions, as well as rotational stiffness about the vertical and anteroposterior axes. All 3 surgical procedures increased inferior translational stiffness relative to the intact condition (Intact: 38 ± 9 N/mm, CCR: 54 ± 23 N/mm (P = .03), CCR+WD 52 ± 20 N/mm (P = .07), CCR ± WD+ACS 50 ± 21 N/mm (P = .17)). However, the combination of CCR, modified WD, and ACS resulted in the greatest increase in stiffness in internal rotation (Intact: 12.5 ± 7.4 cNm/deg, CCR: 1.2 ± 1.1 cNm/deg, CCR+WD 7.2 ± 3.0 N∗m/deg [P = .023], CCR+WD+ACS 11.6 ± 4.9 cNm/deg [P = .055]).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative stability of CCR, WD reconstruction, and ACS appears to be additive. Our findings provide a biomechanical justification for combining all three techniques. Biomechanical studies assessing the performance of various acromioclavicular repairs and reconstructions should therefore incorporate multiaxial testing in their protocols.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Multiple points of fixation that provide multidirectional stability have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce failure rates of acromioclavicular joint repair or stabilization.

Arthroscopic Anatomical Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction using a Button Device and a Semitendinosus Graft

Objective

To report a new technique for anatomical acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction.

Methods

In order to minimize such complications, the authors describe a new anatomical and biological AC joint repair. This technique aims to provide greater stability by using two anatomically placed clavicular tunnels and a combined construct with a double endobutton cortical fixation for primary stabilization, and to be biologically advantageous by using an autologous semitendinosus (ST) tendon graft. Additionally, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is complemented with an AC joint cerclage and capsular reinforcement, which will protect the biological construction in its initial stage of healing.

Results

This technique provides adequate primary and secondary biomechanical stability by passing both a semitendinosus autogenous graft and a double endobutton device, through anatomically placed and small diameter clavicle holes, without the need for coracoid drilling. Our technique showed encouraging results regarding pain resolution, range of motion, and function. At final follow‐up we experienced excellent results with average pain score of 1.6, and average ROM of 159° of forward flexion, 160° of abduction, 68° of external rotation, and internal rotation level at T11. Postoperative function also showed great improvements with average ASES of 85 points, an average Constant Score of 87 and a Subjective Shoulder Value of 89 points. This technique also achieved perfectly acceptable radiographic results, with an average coracoclavicular distance increase of 0.8 mm. Regarding complications, our sample showed one case of AC join subluxation, two cases of internal saphenous nerve injury, and two partial graft tears at the suture‐button interface, with none of these requiring surgical revision.

Conclusion

This technique is advantageous in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and can be performed in both the subacute and chronic setting.

A Technique for a More Accurate Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction in Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Stabilization of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Loss of reduction is the most common complication following acromioclavicular dislocations treatment, with literature showing greater postoperative coracoclavicular distances associated with worse clinical results. We present a surgical gesture that aims to help surgeons achieve and secure an anatomic acromioclavicular reduction during coracoclavicular fixation. This technique has the possibility to improve radiological and functional results of acromioclavicular dislocation treatment.

Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist.

RESULTS

Fourty-four studies were included for a total of 1020 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 38 years. Mean follow-up was 32.9 months. Arthroscopic techniques showed better results than open approach (p < 0.0001). Synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to internal fixation and biologic techniques (p < 0.0001). Among biologic techniques, combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments reconstruction showed better Constant (p = 0.0270) and ASES (p = 0.0113) scores compared to isolated coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction; anatomic biologic non-augmented graft reconstruction showed better Constant (p < 0.0001), VAS (p < 0.0001) and SSV (p = 0.0177) results compared to augmented techniques. No differences in functional outcomes could be found between anatomic biologic non-augmented graft versus synthetic reconstructions. Overall, methodological quality of the included studies was low.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic reconstructions, both synthetic and biologic, showed the best functional results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to compare clinical and radiological outcome of acromio-clavicular joint reconstruction with allografts versus autografts.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and WEB OF SCIENCE databases were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines until February 2020 using the terms: 'coracoclavicular' OR 'coraco-clavicular' OR 'acromioclavicular' OR 'acromio-clavicular joint', AND 'reconstruction'. All studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcome as well as complications after ACJ reconstruction using allo- and/or autografts were included.

RESULTS

A total of 29 articles, including 2 prospective and 27 retrospective studies, involving 622 patients, reconstructed with either allo- (n = 360) or auto-grafts (n = 262), for acromio-clavicular joint instability were identified and included in this review. The majority of studies had low sample sizes (66.7% below n = 20), were retrospective (93.3%), with short-term follow-ups (average 26.2 ± 12.6 months; range 6-186). The study with the largest sample size (n = 128) did not report clinical outcome. A comparison between allo- and auto-graft showed no significant differences regarding age, gender, and follow-up times. Clinical outcome was comparable in both groups, loss of reduction (LOR) and complication rates were higher in the allograft group. Overall a reduction of LOR was shown if additional horizontal stabilization was performed. Also a higher LOR and revision rate was documented in allografts without suture or suture-tape augmentation. The use of more clavicular drill-holes correlated with a higher frequency of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature addressing allograft and autograft reconstruction of unstable coracoclavicular ligaments shows that the published studies are generally of low quality with low levels of evidence. The published literature shows no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the use of autografts or allografts in ACJ reconstruction surgery. Surgical techniques utilizing additional horizontal stabilization may contribute to lower rates of LOR. In cases where allograft tissue is used for ACJ reconstruction the use of suture/tape augmentation may reduce LOR rates as well as revision rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To compare the stability and cost of the used implants in nonanatomic and anatomic acromioclavicular joint repair/reconstruction (ACCR) techniques tested in cadaveric shoulder biomechanical studies during the last decade.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library databases. Studies evaluating 3-direction stability under 70-N loads and load-to-failure protocols with servohydraulic testing systems were included. A meta-analysis of the mean differences of anterior, posterior, and superior direction; relative stability value in 3 directions; superior direction load-to-failure; stability/cost index; and load-to-failure/cost index was performed using a continuous random-effects model and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Eighteen articles were included. Both non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and load-to-failure. ACCR techniques were biomechanically better in terms of anterior stability (P = .04) and relative stability value (mean difference 64.08%, P = .015). However, supraphysiological stability and failure loads were achieved with non-ACCR techniques at a lower cost of implants. Techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes had the greatest stability/cost index and load-to-failure/cost index among the included techniques (confidence interval 99%).

Conclusions

Non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and failure loads in controlled biomechanical testing. However, non-ACCR and techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes provide supraphysiologic stability and failure loads at a lower cost of implants.

Clinical Relevance

Non-ACCR and suture-based techniques may provide more cost-effective and greater value treatment for acromioclavicular joint injury and could be considered in the surgical management of normal activity individuals and cost-sensitive populations.

Treatment of a Failed Type V Acromioclavicular Separation Due to Coracoid Fracture: Revision of Acromioclavicular-Coracoclavicular Reconstruction and Coracoid Fixation

Acromioclavicular (AC) injuries are common, especially in the young and active population. AC joint dislocations account for 8% of all joint dislocations and are even more common in contact sports. These injuries are graded as type I through type VI on the basis of the Rockwood classification method. Types I and II are generally treated without surgery whereas types IV, V, and VI are best treated operatively. Type III dislocations remain controversial in terms of treatment, and many surgeons recommend nonoperative treatment first and operative treatment in case of continued symptoms such as pain, instability, or shoulder girdle dysfunction. The goal of operative treatment is to restore AC joint stability, which involves addressing both the coracoclavicular and coracoacromial ligaments to achieve a desirable patient outcome. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe our technique for management of a failed acromioclavicular stabilization, treated with a coracoclavicular and AC joint capsular reconstruction using tibialis anterior and semitendinosus allografts.

Arthroscopically Assisted Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using the Infinity-Lock Button System With Allograft Augmentation

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are extremely common in the athletic population. Although most low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively, high-grade injuries often require reconstruction of the AC joint. Various reconstructive options have been described with varying risks and benefits to each. Implant or graft failure with loss of reduction as well as clavicle and coracoid fracture are a few of the more common complications following AC joint reconstruction surgery. Currently, no gold standard exists. This technical paper describes an arthroscopically assisted AC joint reconstruction technique using the Infinity-Lock Button System with hamstring allograft augmentation. This technique provides an anatomic, minimally invasive, low-profile reconstruction that may minimize risk of clavicle and coracoid fracture. It also provides augmented stabilization across the AC joint, which may also help resist naturally occurring horizontal and rotational displacing forces.

Review of Weaver and Dunn on treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation

This classic discusses the original publication "Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation" by Weaver and Dunn, which collaborated to develop a technique for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in 1972. Their surgical technique described resection of 2 cm of the distal clavicle and transfer of the acromial end of the coracoacromial ligament into the medullary canal of the distal clavicle. (modified) Weaver-Dunn procedures have been regarded as one of the most effective techniques to treat complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation for a long time. However, anatomic reconstructions have taken over this position since recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior results. Although the Weaver-Dunn procedure has fallen out of favour, it remains of historical significance. For this reason, this review will comprise the historical overview of the Weaver-Dunn procedure, the men behind the eponym and the clinical implication then and now.

Chronic acromioclavicular dislocations: multidirectional stabilization without grafting

Objective

Clinical and radiological evaluation of the surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations with triple button device and AC joint augmentation.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 21 patients with chronic AC dislocations. All patients underwent bilateral-weighted Zanca and Alexander views as well as the Constant score (CS) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Scoring System (ACJI).

Results

A total of 21 patients (19 men and 2 women) with the mean age of 30.7 ± 11.7 years (range, 19-62 years) were able to participate in clinical and radiographic follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 49.7 ± 17.1 months (range, 13-60 months), the results of the CS were 95.2 ± 5.5 (range, 85-100) and ACJI test 89.7 ± 7.9 (range, 75-100), showing no significant differences with the uninjured shoulder (CS, 96.2 ± 3.9; range, 85-100; ACJI, 95.7 ± 4.1; range, 85-100). At the final review, we observed that the preoperative coracoclavicular distance (Zanca view) improved from 12.8 ± 1.5 mm to 8.5 ± 1.3 mm and the AC distance (Alexander view) from 7.8 ± 2.3 mm to 0.99 ± 0.91 mm. Compared with healthy shoulder, these differences were not significant. Osteoarthritis or radiological calcifications were not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The triple button device is an acceptable alternative surgical method for chronic AC joint dislocations. The surgical technique is simple; it does not need a graft, nor does it present major complications, and material extraction is unnecessary.

Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To report radiographic features and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and the association of radiographic features with symptomatology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective picture archiving and communication system query (1/2012-8/2018) identified subjects with prior coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed with attention to the following: (1) acromioclavicular alignment, (2) coracoclavicular width, (3) distal clavicular osteolysis, (4) osseous tunnel widening, and (5) hardware complication or fracture. Medical records were reviewed to determine purpose of imaging follow-up (symptomatic versus routine). Statistical analysis determined associations between binary features and outcomes, and inter-reader agreement.

RESULT

Review of 55 charts identified 32 subjects (23 male, 9 females; age range 24-64; imaged 1-34 months following surgery) meeting inclusion criteria. Loss of acromioclavicular reduction was the most common imaging finding (n = 25, 78%), with 76% progressing to coracoclavicular interval widening. Distal clavicular osteolysis was seen in 21 cases (66%) and was significantly associated with loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction (p = 0.032). Tunnel widening occurred in 23 patients (82%) with more than one follow-up radiograph. Six (19%) had hardware complication or fracture. No radiographic feature or complication had significant correlation with symptomatology (p values 0.071-0.721). Inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial for coracoclavicular interval widening and hardware complication, fair to substantial for tunnel widening, and fair to moderate for loss of acromioclavicular reduction and distal clavicular osteolysis.

CONCLUSION

Loss of acromioclavicular joint reduction, coracoclavicular interval widening, distal clavicular osteolysis, and tunnel widening are common radiographic features after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; however, they do not necessarily correlate with symptomatology.

High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

Background

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint disrupting the AC and Coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments could lead to loss of clavicular strut function. A High-grade AC joint injury remain challenging because of highly variety of treatment and limited evidence exists comparing clinical outcomes and complications after surgery.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcome after arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular Joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Study design

Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with a high grade (Rockwood Type III-V) Acromioclavicular Joint Injury, operatively treated with arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction from 2012 to 2018. The clinical assessment consists of Specific AC Score (SACS) and Nottingham Score. The radiographic evaluations were performed to evaluate the stability of reduction and the complications are assessed.

Results

There were a significant different between groups with AC joint reconstruction and fixation group (20 vs. 8, p < 0.005) and (19 vs. 10, p < 0.005) in SAC score and Nottingham score, respectively. There were no significant different in CC dstance between two groups. At the last follow up 6 patient develop loss of reduction with CC percentage >50% in AC joint fixation. Complication developed in 5 patients (17%) including 2 mild osteolysis, 1 superficial infection, 1 implant failure, and 1 clavicle fracture.

Conclusion

Anatomic AC joint reconstruction was associated with functional and radiologic benefits and better restored the stability.

Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare two different tendon grafting techniques for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction from the data obtained using finite element analysis.

METHODS

Three different finite element models of the shoulder girdle were formulated using computerized tomography images: the reference model, coracoid loop technique (CLT), and drilling technique (DT) model. In all these models, forces were applied to the clavicle along three axes (x, y, and z) of the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Thereafter, data regarding the loading values of the tendon grafts, loads on the coracoid base, and coracoclavicular vertical distance were measured.

RESULTS

While the reference model yielded the lowest values for all the loading conditions as well as the shortest coracoclavicular distance, the DT model demonstrated the highest values for all the loading conditions and the largest coracoclavicular distance.

CONCLUSION

Different tendon grafting techniques may offer different loading values on both bone surface and tendon graft during coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. The drilling technique may be associated with increased loading on the tendon graft and bone surface, causing further loss of reduction and consequent complications.

Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematize the surgical outcomes of anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction in patients with chronic acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ) instability and determine which technique is superior.

METHODS

This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 30th, 2018 for original articles that assessed the outcomes of one or more surgical techniques of anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction in patients with chronic ACJ instability. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality. Pre-to-post meta-analysis was performed for both anatomic and non-anatomic reconstructions.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included comprising 799 patients (mean age of 36.6 years old and 84% males) with a mean follow-up of 34.6 months (range 13 to 74). Surgical techniques included anatomic (tendinous or synthetic grafts/constructs) and non-anatomic reconstruction (Weaver-Dunn or Modified Weaver-Dunn, conjoined tendon transfer, or temporary hook plate). There were significant pre-to-post improvements on the constant score with an average improvement ranging from 11.1 to 50.7 (p < 0.01). Average failure rate was 7.6% (7.5% for anatomic and 8.5% for non-anatomic reconstruction). Non-comparative studies had a mean MINORS score of 9 points (out of 16) and comparative studies 17 (out of 24) with excellent interrater agreement (k = 0.910).

CONCLUSION

Both anatomic and non-anatomic ACJ reconstructions provide significant post-operative improvements, but definitive conclusions on optimal technique remain elusive. Notwithstanding, comparative studies support the use of anatomic ACJ reconstruction which should be preferably used. However, until superiority is demonstrated by robust studies, surgeons should supplement their decision-making with experience and patient preference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Treatment of failed primary reconstruction of the unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint remains challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. When approaching revision cases, the reason for failure has to be precisely identified. The purpose of this manuscript was to perform a critical review of the literature regarding treatment options for failed AC joint stabilization techniques and to provide a treatment algorithm for salvage procedures.

METHODS

A thorough search included electronic databases for articles published up to April 15th, 2019. Inclusion criteria were set as (1) studies that reported on clinical outcomes following surgical or conservative treatment of AC joint dislocation; (2) studies reporting on failure or complications of primary treatment; (3) chronic instabilities caused by delayed or secondary treatment as well as (4) revision and salvage procedures.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified a total of 3269 citations. The final dataset comprised 84 studies published between 1954 and 2019. A total of 5605 patients (9.63% females) were involved with a mean age of 34.5 years. Overall, complication rates varied between 5 and 88.9% in patients with AC joint instability.

CONCLUSION

In the current literature, evidence for treatment of revision AC joint instability is still lacking, however, surgical treatment continues to evolve. The importance of failure analysis and clinically relevant algorithms were highlighted in this review. Adequately restoring native joint biomechanics is needed for ensuring an optimal healing environment that will translate into patient satisfaction and long-term stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Analysis of risk factors for loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the suture-button

BACKGROUND

The most commonly reported complication after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button is loss of reduction. Loss of reduction is a major factor influencing the patient's joint function and subjective satisfaction. The objective of this study is to analyze the risk factors causing loss of reduction after AC joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty patients with AC joint dislocation who were surgically treated the Suture-button in our hospital from February 2009 to February 2015, were recorded their age, sex, BMI, time from injury to surgery, Rockwood's classification, with or without osteoporosis, double or triple button technique, position of the clavicle tunnel, tunnel diameter, coracoid button position, alignment of the button, acromioclavicular ligament repair or not, different methods of postoperative limb immobilization, and so on. Mean comparisons or chi-square test was used for univariate analysis of the above factors, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict risk factors.

RESULTS

Reduction was lost in 23.1% of the patients. Univariate analysis showed that button alignment, double or triple button technique, coracoid button position, position of the clavicle tunnel, acromioclavicular ligament repair or not and osteoporosis had statistically significant association with loss of reduction for AC joint (P = 0.031, 0.034, 0.000, 0.042, 0.047 and 0.000 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that osteoporosis (P = 0.003), position of the clavicle tunnel (P = 0.032) and coracoid button position (P < 0.001) were the risk factors that significantly associated with the loss of reduction after AC joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button.

CONCLUSIONS

Clavicle tunnel location using relative ratio method, accurate placement of button plate under coracoid process (inside or outside deviation <20°), various reinforcement operations for patients with osteoporosis are important factors in preventing loss of reduction.

Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Evidence-based Treatment

Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common in the athletic patient population. Most AC joint injuries occur in young males, typically from a direct fall onto the superior aspect of the shoulder when the arm is adducted. Numerous publications describing joint anatomy and biomechanics, surgical techniques for reconstruction, and rehabilitation protocols are available to guide treatment strategies for injuries to the AC joint. Treatment is typically nonsurgical for type I and II injuries and surgical for type IV and VI injuries. Controversy surrounds the indications for nonsurgical versus surgical treatment of type III and V injuries. Multiple surgical techniques have been described, including coracoclavicular (CC) screw fixation, coracoacromial ligament transfer, and numerous methods of CC ligament reconstruction. Anatomic CC ligament reconstruction can be performed either open or arthroscopically, with and without graft augmentation. This article will discuss clinically relevant anatomy and biomechanical properties of the AC joint and will review decision-making principles and treatment options for common AC joint injuries. An updated summary of clinical outcomes after AC joint treatment will also be presented.

Current Concepts in the Operative Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular (AC) instability is a frequent injury affecting young and athletic populations. Symptomatic, high-grade dislocations may be managed by a myriad of operative techniques that utilize different grafts to achieve reduction. Comparative data are lacking on the ability of these techniques to achieve excellent patient outcomes and stable AC reduction and to minimize complications.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes and complications of different techniques of AC joint reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were accessed to perform a systematic review of the scientific literature from 2000 to 2018 using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following keywords: "acromioclavicular" and "reconstruction." Included articles were evaluated for loss of reduction, complication rate, revision rate, and change in coracoclavicular distance. Articles were stratified by graft and surgical material used: suture only, Endobutton with suture, TightRope, GraftRope, synthetic artificial ligament, tendon graft, and Weaver-Dunn coracoacromial ligament transfer. These outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model and stratified by surgical technique and arthroscopic versus open reconstruction.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles were included in the analysis, with 63 homogeneous populations composed of 1704 patients. The mean age was 37.1 years (range, 15-80 years) with a mean follow-up of 34.3 months (range, 1.5-186 months). The overall failure rate was 20.8% (95% CI, 16.9%-25.2%). The overall pooled complication rate was 14.2% (95% CI, 10.5%-18.8%). The most common complications were infection (6.3% [95% CI, 4.7%-8.2%]), fracture to the coracoid or distal clavicle (5.7% [95% CI, 4.3%-7.6%]), and hardware/button failure (4.2% [95% CI, 3.1%-5.8%]). There were no differences between arthroscopic and open techniques in regard to loss of reduction (P = .858), overall complication rate (P = .774), and revision rate (P = .390). Open surgery had a greater rate of clavicular/coracoid fractures than arthroscopic surgery (P = .048). Heterogeneity, best assessed from the pooled loss of reduction, was measured as I² = 64.0%.

CONCLUSION

Open and arthroscopic AC joint reconstruction techniques have no differences in loss of reduction, the complication rate, and the revision rate based on the available literature. Complications are significant, and profiles vary between surgical techniques, which should be evaluated in the decision making of selecting the technique.

Surgical Volume and Postoperative Complications of Acromioclavicular Joint Separations: Analysis of the ABOS Part II Examination

BACKGROUND

High-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations are relatively rare injuries that are often treated surgically, yet more information is needed about the risks of various surgical procedures in terms of considering and counseling patients regarding operative versus nonoperative treatment.

PURPOSE

To calculate whether the volume of surgical treatment of AC joint separations increased over a recent 12-year period; to examine the nature and frequency of complications, reoperations, and readmissions associated with these procedures; and to assess whether patient- and surgeon-specific factors or surgical technique affected these rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) database for orthopaedic surgeons taking the Part II examination was reviewed from 2005 to 2016 to identify surgical treatment of AC joint separations. The authors calculated the percentage of all surgical cases in the ABOS database and rates of complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Association of these sequelae with patient- and surgeon-specific factors and surgical techniques was assessed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the number or percentage of cases per year over the study period. There was an overall complication rate of 24.5%, a reoperation rate of 7.3%, and a readmission rate of 1.9%. Patients ≥40 years of age had significantly higher complication, reoperation, and readmission rates as compared with patients <40 years of age. There were significant differences in complication, reoperation, readmission, and displacement rates dependent on the type of surgical procedure performed. The highest complication rates were seen with open suspensory fixation, screw fixation, open reduction internal fixation, and arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament repair or reconstruction. The highest reoperation rates were seen with screw fixation, open reduction internal fixation, and open suspensory fixation.

CONCLUSION

The volume of surgical treatment for AC joint separations did not change significantly over the study period. Complication, reoperation, and readmission rates were dependent on the type of surgical procedure performed and patient age. This information should assist surgeons in discussing risks when considering and counseling patients regarding operative versus nonoperative treatment.

Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction With TightRope and FiberTape Loop

High-grade acromioclavicular (AC) injuries are frequent in the active population, and their treatment in the acute setting has reduced sequelae such as chronic pain, functional impairment, and inability to return to sports. Multiple techniques have been described to achieve reduction and fixation of the AC joint, but still there is no consensus. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe the reduction and internal fixation under arthroscopic assistance of the AC joint with the use of a double button implant plus high-strength tape in the acute setting.

Challenges in Treating Acromioclavicular Separations: Current Concepts

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint constitute approximately 3.2% of shoulder injuries. Although the overall goal of treatment continues to be return to activity with a pain-free shoulder, the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations has been fraught with conflict since the earliest reports in both ancient and modern literature. Accurate diagnosis and classification are important to determine the optimal treatment. Nonsurgical therapy remains the mainstay for treatment of low- and most mid-grade injuries, although recent biomechanical and biokinetic data might suggest that patients are more affected than traditionally thought. High-grade injuries often necessitate surgical intervention, although little consensus exists on the timing or technique. New surgical techniques continue to evolve as more biomechanical data emerge and kinematic understanding improves. Challenges associated with management of this injury abound from diagnosis to reconstruction.

Shoulder Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint and coracoclavicular ligaments are common. Many of these injuries heal with nonoperative management. However, more severe injuries may lead to continued pain and shoulder dysfunction. In these patients, surgical techniques have been described to reconstruct the function of the coracoclavicular ligaments to provide stable relationship between the clavicle and scapula. These surgeries have been fraught with high complication rates including clavicle and coracoid fractures, infection, loss of reduction and fixation, hardware migration, and osteolysis. This article reviews common acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular repair and reconstruction techniques and associated complications, and provides recommendations for prevention and management.

Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the surgical outcomes of a hook plate with double-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction by conjoined tendon transfer versus single hook plate surgery for the repair of acute type of Rockwood type III and V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

METHODS

The study cohort included 62 patients with acute (within 6 weeks after trauma) Rockwood type III and V AC joint dislocations who underwent surgery from February 2012 to September 2015. The patients were randomly allocated to the ligament reconstruction group (LR group, n = 31) or the single hook plate group (HP group, n = 31). In both groups, reduction of the AC joint by hook plate and repair of the ruptured AC ligament with absorbable Vicryl sutures were performed homoplastically. The lateral half of the short tendon of the biceps brachii muscle and the lateral half of the flexor tendon were used to reconstruct the trapezoid and conoid ligaments, respectively. Differences in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and total cost were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score (VAS), postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score (CMS), Karlsson score, complication rates, and patient satisfaction at the last follow-up were compared to evaluate the curative effects of the surgical treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after hook plate removal was used to evaluate the reconstructed ligaments and tendon-bone interface.

RESULTS

In total, 25 patients in the LR group and 26 in the HP group completed the follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, Rockwood type, placing time, total cost, and follow-up duration between the LR and HP groups (p > 0.05). However, as compared with the HP group, the surgical duration and incision length were longer in the LR group (92.08 ± 19.25 vs. 56.54 ± 21.29 min and 13.64 ± 0.90 vs. 6.65 ± 1.01 cm, respectively, p < 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in preoperative VAS scores, but the postoperative VAS score was lower in LR group than in the HP group (2.52 ± 1.19 vs. 4.12 ± 1.45, respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in LR group had a remarkable higher CMS and ASES score (89.56 ± 2.80 vs. 79.31 ± 4.97 and 92.60 ± 2.79 vs. 82.35 ± 3.44, respectively, p < 0.05). The overall excellent or good result rate, as evaluated by the Karlsson score, was 92.00% (23/25) and 50.00% (13/26), respectively (p < 0.05). MRI findings revealed good condition of the reconstructed ligaments and tendon-bone interface. The incidence of complications was lower and the satisfaction rate was higher in the LR group than in the HP group (1/25 vs. 16/26 and 23/25 vs. 14/26, respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall surgical effect of the use of a hook plate combined with double-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction is superior to single hook plate surgery for the repair of acute Rockwood type III and V AC joint dislocations.

Functional Outcome of Modified Weaver Dunn Technique for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

BACKGROUND

The debate about the ideal surgical procedure for acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still unresolved and newer techniques are being evolved continuously. The present study evaluates functional outcome of ACJ reconstruction using the modified Weaver Dunn procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

35 patients (26 males, 9 females) with ACJ dislocation, between the age group of 18-48 years (mean age 31 years), were operated using modified Weaver Dunn procedure at our center from May 2005 to June 2010. The dominant side was involved in 25 patients (22 right, 13 left). The mean period from the time of injury to the surgery was 14 days (range 4-26 days). All the patients were assessed with Oxford shoulder score and the time required to return to preinjury level was recorded.

RESULTS

At the mean followup of 95 months (range 72-120 months), the mean Oxford Shoulder Score improved from 25 ± 7.2 to 43 ± 6.9. 85% (30 out of 35) patients had satisfactory results, while 15% (5 out of 35) had mild shoulder dysfunction using this scoring system. Five patients had radiological evidence of Grade 2 ACJ subluxation. Out of these five patients, two developed ossification around the coracoclavicular ligament. Three patients had intermittent mild pain without any functional disability, and one had a moderate restriction of shoulder movements.

CONCLUSION

ACJ reconstruction, using the modified Weaver Dunn procedure in ACJ dislocation, is a reproducible procedure and provides a good functional outcome.

Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation with that of hook plate fixation in patients with acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective case-control study of twenty-six patients with an acute ACJ dislocation who underwent surgical repair with either an arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation or a hook plate from 2013 to 2016. Clinical and radiological data were collected prospectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant Score, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score as well as the visual analogue scale. Radiological outcomes were assessed with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation, while 10 patients underwent hook plate fixation. There were no significant differences in the preoperative variables except for the mean UCLA 4b infraspinatus score (TightRope^® 2.8 vs. hook plate 3.8; p = 0.030). Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the TightRope^® group. At 1 year post-operatively, the TightRope^® group had a significantly better Constant Score and CCD with no complications. All patients with hook plate fixation had to undergo a second procedure for removal of implant, and 3 patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic TightRope^® fixation is a good option for the treatment of acute unstable ACJ dislocations. It has better short-term clinical and radiological outcomes as well as lesser complications when compared to hook plate fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Arthroscopic Technique for Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability With Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using a Gracilis Tendon Graft

We present an arthroscopic technique for stabilization of chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability using a transclavicular-transcoracoidal button technique, combined with a coracoclavicular and AC ligament reconstruction using the gracilis tendon. This arthroscopic technique achieves an anatomic reduction of the clavicle without further implant removal. It ensures vertical and horizontal stabilization of the AC joint. Using a horizontal drill hole through the clavicle and looping the gracilis tendon graft around the coracoid avoids weakening of the coracoid with the risk of fracture.