Increasing rates of surgical treatment for paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a National Database Study from 2000 to 2012

Epidemiology of Brachial Plexus Birth Injury and the Impact of Cesarean Section on Its Incidence

BACKGROUND

While prior research provided thorough analysis of the epidemiology of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) from 1997 to 2012, recent trends are unknown. The goal of this study was to update the understanding of the epidemiology and risk factors for BPBI.

METHODS

Installments of the Kids' Inpatient Database (1997 to 2019) were used to estimate BPBI incidence in the United States in comparison to several independent variables over time. An interaction between cesarean (C-) section and newborn weight was explored by defining BPBI rates in a stratified manner. A logistic regression model accounting for this interaction was developed to produce odds ratios for independent factors. Lastly, the temporal relationship between BPBI rates and C-section rates was explored using linear regression.

RESULTS

BPBI rates were steady around 0.9 to 1.1 per 1000 live births between 2006 and 2019. C-section rates were similarly stable between 32.3% and 34.0% over this period. Stratified analysis indicated C-section delivery was protective against BPBI across newborn weight classes, but the magnitude of this protective value was highest among newborns with macrosomia. Shoulder dystocia was the strongest risk factor for BPBI in the logistic regression model [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 56.9, P<0.001]. The AOR for a newborn with macrosomia born through C-section (AOR: 0.581, 95% CI: 0.365-0.925) was lower than that for a normal weight newborn born vaginally (AOR: 1.000, P=0.022). Medicaid insurance coverage (AOR: 1.176, 95% CI: 1.124-1.230, P<0.001), female sex (AOR: 1.238, 95% CI: 1.193-1.283, P<0.001), and non-White race (AOR: 1.295, 95% CI: 1.237-1.357, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for BPBI. Over time, the rate of BPBI correlated very strongly with the rate of C-section (R2=0.980).

CONCLUSIONS

While BPBI and C-section rates were relatively stable after 2006, BPBI incidence strongly correlated with C-section rates. This highlights the need for close surveillance of BPBI rates as efforts to lower the frequency of C-section evolve. Female, Black, and Hispanic newborns and children with Medicaid insurance experience BPBI at a higher rate, a finding which could direct future research and influence policy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Intramedullary versus plate fixation of both bone forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both bone forearm fractures (BBFFs) are a common injury amongst the pediatric population. The main indications of surgical fixation are open, irreducible, or unstable fractures. The two most commonly used surgical techniques are closed or open reduction with intramedullary fixation (IMF) and open reduction with plate fixation (PF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine which fixation method is superior for BBFFs.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing IMF and PF. We extracted data on union rates, complications, early hardware removal rates, reoperation rates, and radiographic, clinical, and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 922 patients (539 IMF and 383 PF). Similar union rates were achieved by both fixation technique. IMF was associated with a higher incidence of symptomatic hardware, and early hardware removal. Better restoration of the radial bow was observed with the PF group, especially in older children and adolescents. The rate of excellent function was comparable between groups, whereas better cosmesis was reported with the IMF group. Despite shorter fluoroscopy time and immobilization time, PF demonstrated longer tourniquet time, operating time, and hospital stay compared to IMF.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference between IMF and PF in terms of union rates and functional outcomes taking in consideration the merits and demerits of each technique. High-quality randomized controlled trials are, therefore, necessary to determine the superiority of one fixation technique over the other.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Pediatric Forearm Fractures: Investigating the Functional Outcomes of Titanium Elastic Nailing for Unstable Both-Bone Fractures

Introduction

Diaphyseal forearm fractures pose a common challenge in children and adolescents, impacting forearm function due to rotational deformities and angulation. The landscape of pediatric forearm fracture treatment has seen limited progression, with increased surgical intervention adoption driven by factors such as functional implications, technological advancements, societal expectations, and legal concerns.

Materials and Methods

This study enrolled consecutive children aged 5-16 years with forearm fractures presenting between August 2018 and January 2020, requiring surgical intervention. The study assessed functional outcomes and complications in children treated with titanium elastic nailing.

Results

Sixteen patients underwent surgery for both-bone forearm fractures. Elastic nailing was the primary intervention, with 75% undergoing closed nailing. Patients' ages ranged from 5 to 15 years, with 87.5% being male. The study evaluated fracture characteristics, surgical procedures, post-operative care, and complications.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates promising outcomes for flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric forearm fractures. Despite the observed complications, the majority of cases achieved excellent results in fracture union and patient recovery, supporting the efficacy of this technique. Larger cohorts are needed for a comprehensive understanding of its applicability and outcomes in pediatric forearm fracture management.

To Bury or Not to Bury the K-wires After Fixation of Both Bone Forearm Fractures in Patients Younger Than 11 Years Old: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to compare the re-fracture incidence of both radius and ulna fracture in 2 groups treated using intramedullary Kirschner wires (K-wires) where the wires were exposed in group I and buried in group II. The secondary objective was to compare the final functional outcomes and complications incidence.

METHODS

Between March 2019 and February 2021, 60 pediatric patients with unstable radius and ulna fractures amenable to surgical intervention using intramedullary K-wires were randomized into group I (K-wires were exposed above the skin by 2 cm) or group II (K-wires were buried under the skin). In group I, K-wires were removed in the outpatient clinic, while in group II, they were removed under general anesthesia as a day-case procedure. Functional outcome per Price criteria was reported at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Included patients had a mean age of 7.6 years (range: 5 to 10 y). The mean operative time was significantly higher in group II (32.33±7.51 vs. 36.77±8.70 min, P =0.03), with no difference regarding intraoperative x-ray exposure (43.12±15.52 vs. 41.6±11.96 s, P =0.67). Fracture union was achieved after a mean of 44±2.6 days in group I and 43±1.87 days in group II, with no difference between both groups ( P =0.34). One patient had re-fracture in group I and no patients in group II; however, the difference was insignificant ( P =0.12). Infection occurred in 2 patients in each group. All patients reported excellent scores per Price criteria and achieved full wrist and elbow range of motion compared with the contralateral noninjured side.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposed implants are a safe option when dealing with forearm fractures in patients younger than 11 years old, with the added advantage of fewer hospital admissions. Furthermore, it had a similar complication rate and functional outcomes compared with buried implants.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03906929.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Girl predominance in trampoline-related forearm shaft fractures and their increasing incidence since 2000

BACKGROUND

There are reports of increasing incidence of forearm shaft fractures in children. Their treatment has been preferably nonoperative but surgical fixation has gained popularity due to elastic stable intramedullary nailing. We aimed to study whether the incidence of pediatric both-bone forearm shaft fractures and their operative care have changed since year 2000. Trampoline injuries, in particular, and their treatment, re-displacement and short-term outcomes were the secondary outcomes of the study.

METHODS

A population-based study in the geographic catchment area of Oulu University Hospital district in 20-years of time period (2000 - 2019) was performed. Altogether 481 diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children (< 16 years) were included. Age- and sex-related incidence rates were determined, by using the official numbers of the population-in-risk by Statistics Finland. Trampoline jumping and other types of injury were reviewed, as well as particulars of treatment and outcomes.

RESULTS

The incidence of diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures increased from 9.4/100 000 in 2000-2001 to 41.7/100 000 in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). Surgical treatment increased respectively (from 8.8/100 000 in 2000-2001 to 35.3/100 000 in 2018-2019, P < 0.0001). Trampoline injuries explained one in three (29%) of all fractures; they increased from 0% in 2000-2001 to 36.6% in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). During the last four years of the study (2016-2019), most trampoline-related injuries occurred among girls (61.2%), compared to boys (38.8%) (P = 0.031). Trampoline-related injuries comprised 46.9% of all fractures in girls, compared to 26.0% among boys (Diff. 20.8%, 4.7% to 36.1%, P = 0.009). The mean age of the patients elevated from 6.4 years (2000-2001) to 8.6 years (2018-2019) (P = 0.015). Boys predominated (69.6%) in 2000-2009 but during the last ten years, there was no statistical difference in distribution between the genders (males 54.6%, P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

During the twenty-year's of study period, the incidence of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures increased fivefold. Trampolining was the most usual single reason for the fractures. More attention should be focused to increase the safety of trampoline jumping, in particular among the girls.

Change in treatment preferences in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a Danish nationwide register study of 36,244 fractures between 1997 and 2016

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The choice between invasive and non-invasive treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children can be difficult. We investigated the trends in choice of treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures over a 20-year period.  Patients and methods: This is a population-based register study with data from 1997 to 2016 retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry. The primary outcome was choice of primary treatment within 1 week divided into non-invasive treatment (casting only or closed reduction including casting) and invasive (Kirshner wires, intramedullary nailing [IMN], and open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]). The secondary outcomes were further sub-analyses on invasive treatment and age groups.

RESULTS

36,244 diaphyseal forearm fractures were investigated, yielding a mean incidence of 172 per 105/year. The proportion of fractures treated invasively increased from 1997 to 2016, from 4% to 23%. The use of Kirschner wires increased from 1% to 9%, IMN increased from 1% to 14%, and ORIF decreased from 2% to 1%. The changes were evident in all age groups but smaller in the 0-3-year age group.

CONCLUSION

We found an increase in invasive treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures over the investigated period. A change in invasive methods was also found, as the rate of IMN increased over the investigated period and became the predominant surgical treatment choice.

Pediatric Floating Elbow Caused by a Novel Mechanism: A Case Report

A pediatric floating elbow is a rare condition in which there is a humeral supracondylar fracture with an ipsilateral fracture of one or both bones of the forearm. We report a case caused by an unusual mechanism of a semi-automatic washing machine. This injury, on its own, involves the risk of compartment syndrome, however, this particular child came late. We present our approach to this challenging injury along with the controversial management in the literature.

Prolonged Operative Time Associated with Increased Healthcare Utilization after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-Articular and Extra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: An Analysis of 17,482 Cases

Background  The current literature does not contain a quantitative description of the associations between operative time and adverse outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radial fractures (DRF). Questions/Purpose  We aimed to quantify associations between DRF ORIF operative time and 1) 30-day postoperative health care utilization and 2) the incidence of local wound complications. Methods  The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for DRF ORIF cases (January 2012-December 2018). A total of 17,482 cases were identified. Primary outcomes included health care utilization (length of stay [LOS], discharge dispositions, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations) per operative-time category. Secondary outcome was incidence of wound complications per operative-time category. Multivariate regression was conducted to determine operative-time categories associated with increased risk while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and fracture type. Spline regression models were constructed to visualize associations. Results  The 121 to 140-minute category was associated with significantly higher risk of a LOS > 2 days (odds ration [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1-2.45; p  = 0.014) and nonhome discharge (OR: 1.72; 95% CI:1.09-2.72; p  = 0.02) versus 41 to 60-minute category. The ≥ 180-minute category exhibited highest odds of LOS > 2 days (OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.33-3.26; p  = 0.001), nonhome discharge disposition (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.05-3.33; p  = 0.035), and 30-day reoperation occurrence (OR: 3.52; 95% CI: 1.59-7.79; p  = 0.002). There was no association between operative time and 30-day readmission ( p  > 0.05 each). Higher odds of any-wound complication was first detected at 81 to 100-minute category (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.08-8.4; p  = 0.035) and peaked ≥ 181 minutes (OR: 9.62; 95% CI: 2.57-36.0; p  = 0.001). Spline regression demonstrated no increase in risk of adverse outcomes if operative times were 50 minutes or less. Conclusion  Our findings demonstrate that prolonged operative time is correlated with increased odds of health care utilization and wound complications after DRF ORIF. Operative times greater than 60 minutes seem to carry higher odds of postoperative complications.

Pediatric Orthopedic Trauma Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered the practice of pediatric orthopedic trauma surgery in both outpatient and inpatient settings. While significant declines in patient volume have been noted, the impact on surgeon decision-making is unclear. Purpose: We sought to investigate changes in pediatric orthopedic trauma care delivery as a result of COVID-19 and determine their implications for future orthopedic practice. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to all members (N = 1515) of the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America (POSNA) in March to April 2021; only members who provided care for pediatric orthopedic trauma patients were asked to complete it. The survey included questions on hospital trauma call, inpatient care, outpatient clinic practice, and 3 unique fracture case scenarios. Results: A total of 147 pediatric orthopedic surgeons completed the survey, for a 9.7% response rate, with 134 (91%) taking trauma call at a hospital as part of their practice. Respondents reported significant differences across institutions regarding COVID-19 testing, hospital rounding, and employee COVID-19 screening. Changes in outpatient fracture management were observed, including a decreased number of follow-up visits for nondisplaced clavicle fractures, distal radius buckle fractures, and toddler's fractures. Of respondents who changed their fracture follow-up schedules due to COVID-19, over 75% indicated that they would continue these outpatient treatment schedules after the pandemic. Conclusions: This survey found changes in pediatric orthopedic trauma care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of telemedicine and abbreviated follow-up practices for common fracture types are likely to persist following the resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Do We Need to Stabilize All Reduced Metaphyseal Both-bone Forearm Fractures in Children with K-wires?

BACKGROUND

Short-term follow-up studies have shown that reduced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children should be treated with K-wires to prevent redisplacement and inferior functional results. Minimum 5-year follow-up studies are limited. Range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, and radiographic parameters at minimum 5-year follow-up should be evaluated because they could change insights into how to treat pediatric metaphyseal forearm fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does K-wire stabilization of reduced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children provide better forearm rotation at minimum 5-year follow-up? (2) Do malunions (untreated redisplaced fractures) of reduced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children induce worse functional results? (3) Which factors lead to limited forearm rotation at minimum 5-year follow-up?

METHODS

We analyzed the extended minimum 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in which children with a reduced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fracture were randomized to either an above-elbow cast (casting group) or fixation with K-wires and an above-elbow cast (K-wire group). Between January 2006 and December 2010, 128 patients were included in the original randomized controlled trial: 67 in the casting group and 61 in the K-wire group. For the current study, based on an a priori calculation, it was determined that, with an anticipated mean limitation in prosupination (forearm rotation) of 7° ± 7° in the casting group and 3° ± 5° in the K-wire group, a power of 80% and a significance of 0.05, the two groups should consist of 50 patients each. Between January 2014 and May 2016, 82% (105 of 128) of patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 6.8 ± 1.4 years: 54 in the casting group and 51 in the K-wire group. At trauma, patients had a mean age of 9 ± 3 years and had mean angulations of the radius and ulna of 25° ± 14° and 23° ± 18°, respectively. The primary result was limitation in forearm rotation. Secondary outcome measures were radiologic assessment, patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDASH and ABILHAND-kids), handgrip strength, and VAS score for cosmetic appearance. Assessments were performed by the first author (unblinded). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze which factors led to a clinically relevant limitation in forearm rotation.

RESULTS

There was a mean limitation in forearm rotation of 5° ± 11° in the casting group and 5° ± 8° in the K-wire group, with a mean difference of 0.3° (95% CI -3° to 4°; p = 0.86). Malunions occurred more often in the casting group than in the K-wire group: 19% (13 of 67) versus 7% (4 of 61) with an odds ratio of 0.22 for K-wiring (95% CI 0.06 to 0.80; p = 0.02). In patients in whom a malunion occurred (malunion group), there was a mean limitation in forearm rotation of 6° ± 16° versus 5° ± 9° in patients who did not have a malunion (acceptable alignment group), with a mean difference 0.8° (95% CI -5° to 7°; p = 0.87). Factors associated with a limited forearm rotation ≥ 20° were a malunion after above-elbow casting (OR 5.2 [95% CI 1.0 to 27]; p = 0.045) and a refracture (OR 7.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 37]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

At a minimum of 5 years after injury, in children with a reduced metaphyseal both-bone forearm fracture, there were no differences in forearm rotation, patient-reported outcome measures, or radiographic parameters between patients treated with only an above-elbow cast compared with those treated with additional K-wire fixation. Redisplacements occurred more often if treated by an above-elbow cast alone. If fracture redisplacement is not treated promptly, this leads to a malunion, which is a risk factor for a clinically relevant (≥ 20°) limitation in forearm rotation at minimum 5-year follow-up. Children with metaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures can be treated with closed reduction and casting without additional K-wire fixation. Nevertheless, a clinician should inform parents and patient about the high risk of fracture redisplacement (and therefore malunion), with risk for limited forearm rotation if left untreated. Weekly radiographic monitoring is essential. If redisplacement occurs, remanipulation and fixation with K-wires should be considered based on gender, age, and direction of angulation. Future research is required to establish the influence of (skeletal) age, gender, and the direction of malunion angulation on clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Trends in Operative Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Forearm Fractures Among American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates

BACKGROUND

Pediatric and adolescent forearm fractures are among the most common injuries treated by orthopaedic surgeons. Recent literature shows that there has been an increased interest in operative management for these injuries. The purpose of the current study was to examine the trends in case volume, patient age, surgeon fellowship training, and postoperative complications of surgically treated pediatric forearm fractures over >15-year period of American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination candidates.

METHODS

ABOS Part II candidates' Oral Examination Case List data from 2003 to 2019 was queried for all pediatric and adolescent (19 y of age and below) forearm fractures treated operatively. Patient demographics, fracture type, complications, and candidate fellowship type were identified for each case. Linear regression was used to delineate annual trends in patient age, complication rates, and case volume by fellowship type. Analysis of variance was performed to evaluate complication rates by fellowship type. Statistical significance for all comparative analyses was set at P-value <0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 4178 pediatric and adolescent forearm fractures (mean age: 12.6 y; SD: 3.7 y) were treated surgically among ABOS Part II Oral Examination candidates during their 6-month collection periods from 2003 to 2019. The mean patient age decreased significantly (P<0.001) over the study timeframe, while complication rates increased (P<0.001). Pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons performed significantly more cases than general orthopaedic surgeons over recent years (P<0.001). No significant trends were identified between fellowship type and complication rates. The overall surgical complication rate was 17%. The complication rate of open fractures was 24%, which was significantly >15% complication rate of closed fractures (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are performing an increasing number of pediatric and adolescent forearm fracture fixation when compared with other orthopaedic surgeons. The mean age of surgically managed pediatric forearm fracture patients has decreased from 2003 to 2019. There has been an increase in the rate of overall reported complications following pediatric forearm fracture surgery over recent years, without any significant association to any particular subspecialty. Future studies should evaluate the comparative effectiveness of surgical treatment of pediatric forearm fractures compared with closed management.

National trends in the treatment of femur fractures in the preschool population: Age and geography play a role

BACKGROUND

Spica casting and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) are options for diaphyseal femur fractures in preschool-age children (ages 3-6 years). Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are only of moderate or limited strength, which may lead to variation in practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the epidemiology of children undergoing these procedures in the United States.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System, a national database consisting of 49 children's hospitals, was queried for patients between the ages of 3 and 6 years undergoing spica casting or ESIN for a diaphyseal femur fracture between 2011 and 2017. Non-diaphyseal fractures, subjects with associated syndromes or neuromuscular disorders, and pathologic fractures were excluded. Census guidelines were used to categorize hospitals geographically into regions and divisions. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Analysis included 4059 subjects. Spica casting was performed in 2878 children (71%) and ESIN in 1181 (29%). The median age of those undergoing spica casting was 3.0 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1 year] compared to 5.0 years for ESIN (IQR 2 years; p<0.01). When adjusting for covariates in a multivariate model, each year of increasing age resulted in 4.4 times higher odds that ESIN would be performed (95% CI 4.0-4.8, p<0.01). Compared to the Northeast, a child in the Midwest had 3.6 times higher odds of undergoing ESIN rather than spica casting (95% CI 2.6-5.1, p<0.01). Age at time of ESIN was lowest in the Midwest and highest in the Northeast (4.8±1.0 versus 5.3±0.9 years; p<0.01). There was no variation in the ratio of spica casting to ESIN performed in this age group between 2011 and 2017, including after release of the 2015 CPG.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, there is substantial variation in the chosen treatment for diaphyseal femur fractures in preschool-age children. ESIN is more likely to be chosen for older children. It is also most likely to be performed in the Midwest and least likely in the Northeast. These findings may have implications in terms of cost and resource utilization and suggest the need for more clinical data to guide surgical indications.

Management of pediatric forearm fractures: what is the best therapeutic choice? A narrative review of the literature

PURPOSE

This narrative review intends to summarize the most important and relevant data on diagnosis and treatment of pediatric forearm fractures and to describe the characteristics and advantage of each therapeutic option.

METHODS

We conducted a literature research considering peer-reviewed papers (mainly clinical trials or scientific reviews) using the string "forearm fracture AND epidemiology" or "forearm fracture AND diagnosis or " forearm fracture AND treatment" or "forearm fracture AND casting" or "forearm fracture AND surgery". Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) till April 2020 and reference lists of retrieved articles. Only English-language articles were included in the review.

RESULTS

Conservative management with cast immobilization is a safe and successful treatment option in pediatric forearm fractures. Surgical indication is recommended when an acceptable reduction cannot be obtained with closed reduction and casting. Surgical treatment options are intramedullary nail, plating and hybrid fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is not a unique consensus about fracture management and treatment. Further studies are necessary to create univocal guidelines about optimal treatment, considering new techniques and available technologies.

Inequalities in Pediatric Fracture Care Timeline Based on Insurance Type

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic and insurance status are often linked with limited access to health care. Despite several government-funded projects aimed at curtailing these barriers, pediatric orthopaedic patients continue to experience delays in receiving timely care for fracture treatments. This delay has been well-identified within the orthopaedic literature but, to our knowledge, has never been characterized based on timeline. Thus, the goal of this study is to evaluate the role of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance type on the timeline of pediatric patients to obtain orthopaedic care within our community.

METHODS

Pediatric patients presenting to our clinic for the treatment of one of 21 most common fractures were included. Patient demographics and the timeline of patient care were collected by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Government-funded insurance accounted for 60.6% of the 413 patients. These patients experienced significant (P < 0.001) delays in access to care when compared with commercial insurance patients; the time between injury and referral as well as the overall time from injury to orthopaedic evaluation was 2.8 and twofold greater at 4.4 days and 9.2 days, respectively. A strong correlation was established between income levels and insurance type.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric patients with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to rely on government-funded insurance and experience delays in fracture evaluation.

Tendency towards operative treatment is increasing in children's fractures: results obtained from patient databases, causes, impact of evidence-based medicine

Results of numerous studies assessing the national or the local patient databases in several countries have indicated that the overall rate of operative treatment in fractures, as well as the rate in certain upper and lower limb fractures, has significantly increased in children. The most prominent increase in the rate of operative treatment was observed in forearm shaft fractures.

Results of several survey studies have revealed that there was not a high level of agreement among paediatric orthopaedic surgeons concerning treatment preferences for several children’s fractures.

The reasons for the increasing tendency towards operative treatment are multifactorial and patient-, parent- and surgeon-dependent factors as well as technological, economic, social, environmental and legal factors seem to have an impact on this trend.

It is obvious that evidence-based medicine is not the only factor that leads to this tendency. A high level of scientific evidence is currently lacking to support the statement that operative treatment really leads to better long-term outcomes in children’s fractures. Properly designed multicentre clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatment options in many fractures in children.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:347-353. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200012

Radius and ulna locking intramedullary nails are safe and reliable after adolescent forearm fractures: a case-controlled study in adolescents

The aim of this study is to compare the radiological and functional results of newly designed radius and ulna intramedullary nails (IMNs) with those of titanium elastic nails (TENs) for forearm fractures in adolescents requiring surgery. Patients aged between 10 and 17 years who underwent surgery for forearm fractures between January 2011 and January 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 45 patients who met the study criteria, 18 patients received IMNs and 27 patients received TENs. The clinical results were evaluated according to the Price criteria. The mean age, mean follow-up period, fracture type, postoperative period, length of hospital stay, surgical reduction type, union time, implant diameter and radiological findings were evaluated. No differences were found between the groups in terms of mean age, mean follow-up time, type of fracture, length of hospitalization, reduction quality, complications or union time (P > 0.05). Significant differences were observed in implant diameter, angulation on early radiological examination and the formation of large bone calluses (P < 0.05). According to the Price criteria, among the patients who received IMNs, 16 patients had excellent results, while two patients had good results, and among the patients who received TENs, 20 patients had excellent results, while seven patients had good results. According to our study, radius and ulna locked intramedullary nailing treatments for adolescent forearm fractures are as safe and reliable as TEN treatment.

What Are the Primary Cost Drivers of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States? A Cost-Minimization Analysis of 14,713 Patients

PURPOSE

To analyze the individual costs associated with anterior crucial ligament reconstruction (ACLR), accounting for patient demographics, perioperative decision making, and location of the surgical procedure (hospital vs ambulatory surgery center), utilizing a cost-minimization analysis in a large national database.

METHODS

Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to determine which patient and surgical variables were the largest cost drivers for ACLR in the United States according to the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database.

RESULTS

The average cost for ACLR (n = 14,713) was $24,707 (standard deviation, $15,644). When patient variables were considered, younger age (P < .001), male sex (P < .001), Hispanic ethnicity (P < .001), number of chronic medical conditions (P < .001), Medicare insurance (P < .001), and quartile of household income (P < .001) were all associated with higher costs after ACLR. For operative variables, time spent in the operating room (P < .001), meniscal repair (P < .001), and use of general anesthesia alone (P < .001) were all associated with higher costs for ACLR. There was no significant difference between cost of surgery performed at a private surgery center and cost at a hospital-owned center. In the multivariate regression, the 3 variables with the greatest influence on cost of ACLR were use of isolated general anesthesia (associated with an increase of $2,049), Hispanic ethnicity ($1,828), and >1 chronic medical condition ($1,749). Male sex, time in operating room, and older age also significantly increased ACLR cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest contributor to cost of ACLR was the use of general anesthesia alone. Time spent in the operating room increased ACLR cost by $108 per minute. Patient factors included greater age, male sex, Hispanic ethnicity, number of chronic medical conditions, Medicare insurance, and annual income. Meniscal repair and regional nerve block did not significantly affect cost as determined by multivariate regression.

An alternative to plaster cast treatment in a pediatric trauma center using the CAD/CAM technology to manufacture customized three-dimensional-printed orthoses in a totally hospital context: a feasibility study

The aim of this study is to implement the clinical use of the three-dimensional (3D) design and printing technology in pediatric pathologies requiring immobilization. We describe the manufacturing process of the 3D device in place of the plaster cast usually applied to a child 48/72 h after the access to the Trauma Center Traumatology Hub. This procedure had already been performed at Level II, Trauma Center, Campania Region, Orthopaedic Division of Santobono Children's Hospital, Naples, Italy. The operative phase was performed by two 3D printers and a scanner in the bioengineering laboratory of the hospital's outpatient area. The phase of software elaboration requires close cooperation among physicians and engineers. We decided to use a model with a double-shell design and holes varying in width to ensure complete ventilation and lightness of the device. We chose to treat nondisplaced metaphyseal distal fractures of the radius in 18 patients enrolled from January 2017 to November 2017. The flow chart includes clinical and radiological examinations of every enrolled child, collecting information required by the program and its elaboration by bioengineers, and then transfer of the results to 3D printers. The child, immobilized by a temporary splint, wore his 3D device after 12/24 h. Then, he underwent serial check-ups in which the effectiveness and appropriateness of the treatment were clinically monitored and evaluated using subjective scales: visual analogue scale and patient-rated wrist evaluation. All the fractures consolidated both radiologically and clinically after the treatment, with no complications reported. Only one partial breakage of the device happened because of an accidental fall. The statistical analysis of the visual analogue scale and patient-rated wrist evaluation data shows that children's activities of everyday life improved during the immobilization thanks to this treatment. This first study shows that using a 3D device instead of a traditional plaster cast can be an effective alternative approach in the treatment of pediatric nondisplaced metaphyseal distal radius fractures, with high overall patient satisfaction. We believe that 3D technology could be extended to the treatment of more complex fractures; this will be the subject of our second study.

Impact of obesity on operative treatment and inpatient outcomes of paediatric limb fractures

AIMS

The aim of this study was to utilize a national paediatric inpatient database to determine whether obesity influences the operative management and inpatient outcomes of paediatric limb fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was used to evaluate children between birth and 17 years of age, from 1997 and 2012, who had undergone open and closed treatment of humeral, radial and ulna, femoral, tibial, and ankle fractures. Demographics, hospital charges, lengths of stay (LOS), and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Obesity was significantly associated with increased rates of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for: distal humeral (odds ratio (OR) = 2.139, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92 to 3.44; p < 0.001); distal radius and ulna fractures (OR = 1.436, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.16; p < 0.05); distal femoral (OR = 2.051, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.60; p < 0.05); tibial and fibula shaft (OR = 2.101, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.50; p < 0.001); and ankle (OR = 1.733, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.39; p < 0.001). Older age was significantly associated with ORIF for all fractures (p < 0.05). LOS, hospital charges, and complications were significantly increased in obese patients following ORIF for upper and lower limb fractures (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Obese paediatric patients are more likely to undergo ORIF in both upper and lower limb fractures and have more inpatient complications. These findings may assist in informing obese paediatric fracture patients and their families regarding the increased risk for open operative fixation and associated outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:491-496.

Patient and Parent Satisfaction With Sling Use After Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Customized Cast-Sling Versus Standard Cast and Sling

BACKGROUND

Long arm cast immobilization after operative and nonoperative treatment of pediatric upper extremity fractures is common. The use of a sling to aid in carrying the casted extremity as well as provide further immobilization is also common practice. Off-the-shelf slings vary in quality and fit, can be confusing for parents/patients to apply, and lead to frustration and dissatisfaction with its use. The purpose of this investigation was to compare patient/parent centered outcomes after the use of a customized sling compared with a standard sling by utilizing a prospective, randomized-controlled trial. We hypothesized that patients and their parents would find the "Providence" Pedi Cast-Sling (PPCS) to be more convenient and be more satisfied with its use compare with a standard sling.

METHODS

Eligible subjects included patients 0 to 18 years old, evaluated at an urban, tertiary care pediatric emergency department (ED), who sustained an upper extremity fracture that required placement of a long-arm cast. Exclusion criteria were: open fractures; fractures at multiple levels; fractures requiring urgent/emergent surgery; admitted patients; bivalved casts. Patients were randomized to receive a standard sling or a PPCS. Questionnaires assessing patient/parent satisfaction, preferences, sling-use, and pain level were collected at patients' first follow-up visit.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were randomized with 71 questionnaires available for analysis (39 standard sling vs. 32 PPCS). There were statistically significant differences for satisfaction scores for all related questions between patients who received a PPCS compared with a standard sling. Patients and their parents were more likely to choose the PPCS (P=0.001), were more satisfied with the PPCS (P<0.006), and reported the PPCS to be more convenient than a standard sling (P<0.001). Patients who received a PPCS wore the sling for a greater number of hours during the day (10.3±7.1 h) compared with those who received a standard sling (5.9±5.0 h) (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The "Providence" Pedi Cast-Sling is a superior alternative to an off-the-shelf sling when used after the application of a long-arm cast providing greater convenience, compliance, and satisfaction to both patients and families.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I-Prospective randomized-controlled trial.

Inpatient surgical treatment of paediatric proximal humerus fractures between 2000 and 2012

PURPOSE

To estimate the rate of surgical treatment of paediatric proximal humerus fractures over time utilizing a large, publicly available national database.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database was evaluated between the years 2000 and 2012. Proximal humerus fractures were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9^th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) diagnosis codes. ICD-9 CM procedure codes were used to identify patients who received surgical treatment. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine variables associated with greater proportions of surgical treatment. All statistical analyses were performed utilizing SAS statistical software v.9.4. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 7520 proximal humerus fracture admissions were identified; 3247 (43.2%) were treated surgically. The percentage of patients receiving surgery increased from 39.3% in 2000 to 46.4% in 2012 (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, increased age, increased ICD-9 derived injury severity scores (ICISS) and more recent year were associated with an increased proportion of patients receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001). Medicaid payer status (p < 0.001) and admission to a children's hospital (p = 0.045) were associated with a lower proportion of surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The rate of operative treatment of paediatric proximal humerus fractures increased over time between 2000 and 2012. Increased surgical rates were independently associated with older age, increased ICISS, treatment at a non-children's hospital and non-Medicaid insurance status. Further study is needed to provide evidence to support improved outcomes after operative treatment of paediatric proximal humerus fractures.