1
|
Teng MJ, Zadro JR, Pickles K, Copp T, Shaw MJ, Khoudair I, Horsley M, Warnock B, Hutchings OR, Petchell JF, Ackerman IN, Drayton A, Liu R, Maher CG, Traeger AC. RECITAL: a non-inferiority randomised control trial evaluating a virtual fracture clinic compared with in-person care for people with simple fractures (study protocol). BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080800. [PMID: 38316591 PMCID: PMC10859974 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most simple undisplaced fractures can be managed without surgery by immobilising the limb with a splint, prescribing medication for pain, and providing advice and early rehabilitation. Recent systematic reviews based on retrospective observational studies have reported that virtual fracture clinics can deliver follow-up care that is safe and cost-effective. However, no randomised controlled trial has investigated if a virtual fracture clinic can provide non-inferior physical function outcomes compared with an in-person clinic for patients with simple fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 312 participants will be recruited from 2 metropolitan hospitals located in Sydney, Australia. Adult patients will be eligible if they have an acute simple fracture that can be managed with a removable splint and is deemed appropriate for follow-up at either the virtual or in-person fracture clinic by an orthopaedic doctor. Patients will not be eligible if they have a complex fracture that requires a cast or surgery. Eligible participants will be randomised to receive their follow-up care either at the virtual or the in-person fracture clinic. Participants at the virtual fracture clinic will be reviewed within 5 days of receiving a referral through video calls with a physiotherapist. Participants at the in-person fracture clinic will be reviewed by an orthopaedic doctor within 7-10 days of receiving a referral. The primary outcome will be the patient's function measured using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, patient-reported experiences, pain, health cost, healthcare utilisation, medication use, adverse events, emergency department representations and surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone) (X23-0200 and 2023/ETH01038). The trial results will be submitted for publication in a reputable international journal and will be presented at professional conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12623000934640.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Jiat Teng
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joshua R Zadro
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristen Pickles
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tessa Copp
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Miranda J Shaw
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Isabella Khoudair
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Horsley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benjamin Warnock
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Owen R Hutchings
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey F Petchell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ilana N Ackerman
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Drayton
- Consumer Representative, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rong Liu
- RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spierings J, Willinge G, Kokke M, Twigt B, de Lange W, Geerdink T, van der Velde D, Repping S, Goslings C. Health Care Professionals' Experiences With a Mobile Self-Care Solution for Low Complex Orthopedic Injuries: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12:e51510. [PMID: 38306162 PMCID: PMC10873799 DOI: 10.2196/51510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To cope with the rising number of patients with trauma in an already constrained Dutch health care system, Direct Discharge (DD) has been introduced in over 25 hospitals in the Netherlands since 2019. With DD, no routine follow-up appointments are scheduled after the emergency department (ED) visit, and patients are supported through information leaflets, a smartphone app, and a telephone helpline. DD reduces secondary health care use, with comparable patient satisfaction and primary health care use. Currently, little is known about the experiences of in-hospital health care professionals with DD. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of health care professionals with the DD protocol to enhance durable adoption and improve the protocol. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods study parallel to the implementation of DD in 3 hospitals. Data were collected through a preimplementation survey, a postimplementation survey, and semistructured interviews. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, and qualitative data were reported using thematic analysis. Outcomes included the Bowen feasibility parameters: implementation, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, demand, and applicability. Preimplementation expectations were compared with postimplementation experiences. Health care professionals involved in the daily clinical care of patients with low-complex, stable injuries were eligible for this study. RESULTS Of the 217 eligible health care professionals, 128 started the primary survey, 37 completed both surveys (response rate of 17%), and 15 participated in semistructured interviews. Health care professionals expressed satisfaction with the DD protocol (median 7.8, IQR 6.8-8.9) on a 10-point scale, with 82% (30/37) of participants noting improved information quality and uniformity and 73% (27/37) of patients perceiving reduced outpatient follow-up and imaging. DD was perceived as safe by 79% (28/37) of participants in its current form, but a feedback system to reassure health care professionals that patients had recovered adequately was suggested to improve DD. The introduction of DD had varying effects on workload and job satisfaction among different occupations. Health care professionals expressed intentions to continue using DD due to increased efficiency, patient empowerment, and self-management. CONCLUSIONS Health care professionals perceive DD as an acceptable, applicable, safe, and efficacious alternative to traditional treatment. A numerical in-app feedback system (eg, in-app communication tools or recovery scores) could alleviate health care professionals' concerns about adequate recovery and further improve DD protocols. DD can reduce health care use, which is important in times of constrained resources. Nonetheless, both advantages and disadvantages should be considered while evaluating this type of treatment. In the future, clinicians and policy makers can use these insights to further optimize and implement DD in clinical practice and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle Spierings
- Department of Traumasurgery, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gijs Willinge
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, The Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marike Kokke
- Department of Traumasurgery, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Twigt
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, The Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wendela de Lange
- The Healthcare Innovation Center, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Thijs Geerdink
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, The Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd Repping
- Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carel Goslings
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, The Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spierings JF, Willinge GJA, Schuijt HJ, Smeeing DPJ, Kokke MC, Colaris JW, Goslings JC, Twigt BA. Direct discharge for children with a greenstick or torus fracture of the wrist is a non-inferior satisfactory solution to traditional treatment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024:10.1007/s00068-023-02391-w. [PMID: 38217672 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02391-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Direct Discharge protocols (DD) can alleviate strain on healthcare systems by reducing routine outpatient follow-up. These protocols include low-complex musculoskeletal injuries, such as isolated greenstick fractures or torus fractures of the wrist in children. While there is consensus on the effectiveness of DD, there is a lack of injury-specific powered studies. This study compares treatment satisfaction between DD and traditional treatment in children with a greenstick fracture or torus fractures of the wrist. METHODS Children with isolated torus or greenstick fractures of the distal radius or ulna were eligible for inclusion before (pre-DD cohort) and after (DD cohort) the implementation of DD in four hospitals. Traditionally, patients receive a (soft) cast and minimally one routine outpatient follow-up appointment. With DD, patients are discharged directly from the ED after receiving a brace and information, summarized in a smartphone app and a helpline for questions during recovery. The primary outcome was patient or proxy treatment satisfaction (0 to 10), and a power analysis was performed to assess non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included complications, functional outcomes measured in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE), primary healthcare utilisation, and secondary healthcare utilisation (follow-up appointments and imaging). RESULTS In total, 274 consecutive children were included to analyse the primary endpoint. Of these, 160 (58%) were male with a median age of 11 years (IQR 8 to 12). Pre-DD and DD treatment satisfaction did not vary statistically significantly for greenstick fractures (p = 0.09) and torus fractures (p = 0.93). No complications were observed. PROMIS UE showed no statistically significant differences before and after implementation of direct discharge protocol for torus (p = 0.99) or greenstick (p = 0.45) fractures. Secondary healthcare utilisation regarding follow-up was significantly lower in the DD-torus cohort compared to the pre-DD torus cohort, with a mean difference (MD) of - 1.00 follow-up appointments (95% Confidence Interval (CI) - 0.92 to - 1.13). Similar results were found in the pre DD-greenstick cohort compared to the pre-DD-greenstick cohort (MD): - 1.17 follow-up appointments, 95% CI - 1.09 to - 1.26). CONCLUSION Direct Discharge is non-inferior to traditional treatment in terms of treatment satisfaction for paediatric patients with greenstick or torus fractures of the wrist compared to children treated with rigid immobilisation and routine follow-up. Furthermore, the results demonstrate no complications, comparable functional outcomes, and a statistically significant reduction of secondary healthcare utilisation, making DD a good solution to cope with strained resources for children with an isolated greenstick fracture or torus fracture of the wrist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle Friso Spierings
- Department of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Henk Jan Schuijt
- Department of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marike Cornelia Kokke
- Department of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Willem Colaris
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Carel Goslings
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Anne Twigt
- Department of Trauma Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Das A, Xi Tan J, Pillai A. The Efficacy of Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs) and the Impact of Physician Risk Appetite on Discharge Rates. Cureus 2024; 16:e51798. [PMID: 38187019 PMCID: PMC10771814 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) allow the triage of emergency department referrals to identify those requiring further care and those that are suitable for discharge. Appropriate discharge from VFC benefits the patient and the healthcare provider by avoiding unnecessary face-to-face appointments. This study investigates factors associated with VFC discharge rates at our hospital and detects potential areas for improvement. Methodology A retrospective review was conducted on 4819 consecutive VFC referrals between March 17, 2021, and March 16, 2022, from a single hospital. Patient demographics, referral outcomes, and triaging consultant data were collected. Sixteen consultants conducted daily VFCs during the study period. Eleven consultants completed the DOSPERT psychometric test to measure their attitude toward risk. The data was analysed using Spearman's rho and Chi-square tests. Results The mean discharge from VFC was 35.4% (29.6-41.0%). The highest rates of discharge were for back pain (100%), followed by fractures of the pubic ramus (100%), the base of the fifth metatarsal (86.89%), the acetabulum (75%), and the proximal radius (73.03%). Consultant experience was significantly negatively correlated with discharge rate (p<0.05). The frequency of conducting a VFC was not associated with the discharge rate (p=0.758). In subspecialty analysis, 90% of lower limb consultants discharged more lower limb presentations from VFC, compared with upper limb consultants (p=0.001). There was no significant correlation between DOSPERT scores and discharge rates (p=0.65). Conclusions VFC remains an important tool for patient care. Consultant experience is associated with a more cautious approach to discharge; however, there was no relationship between a consultant's risk attitude and their VFC discharge rate in this study. Lower-limb consultants appear to discharge lower-limb injuries more readily when compared with their upper-limb colleagues. These insights could be used to improve emergency department and VFC efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhirun Das
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Jie Xi Tan
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Manchester, Manchester, GBR
| | - Anand Pillai
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Waite E, Ahmed Z. How safe and effective are paediatric virtual fracture clinics? A systematic review. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1261035. [PMID: 37964895 PMCID: PMC10641786 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1261035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) involve a consultant-led multidisciplinary team meeting where cases are reviewed before a telephone consultation with the patient. VFCs have the advantages of reducing waiting times, outpatient appointments and time off school compared to face-to-face (F2F) fracture clinics. There has been a surge in VFC use since the COVID-19 pandemic but there are still concerns over safety in the paediatric population. Fractures make up a large burden of paediatric injuries, therefore research is required on the safety and efficacy of paediatric VFCs. This systematic review will look at the safety and effectiveness of paediatric VFCs, as well as determine the cost-effectiveness and parent preferences. Methods As per the PRISMA guidelines two independent reviewers searched the following databases: Medline, Embase and Web of Science. Studies were included if children under 18 years old presented to A&E with a suspected or confirmed simple un-displaced fracture and were referred to a VFC. The primary outcomes assessed were effectiveness and safety, with the secondary outcomes of cost-effectiveness and parent satisfaction. Results Six studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. There was a high rate of direct discharge from the VFC leading to reduced outpatient appointments. All patients were seen within 72 h of presentation. There were limited incidences of missed fractures and the rates of re-presentation were similar to that of F2F orthopaedic clinics. There were significant cost savings for the hospitals and high parent satisfaction. Discussion VFCs have shown to be safe and effective at managing most stable, low operative risk paediatric fractures. Safety must be ensured with a telephone helpline and an open return to fracture clinic policy. More research is needed into specific paediatric fracture types to be managed in the VFC. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#searchadvanced, identifier: CRD42023423795.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Waite
- College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zubair Ahmed
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fokkema CB, Janssen L, Roumen RMH, van Dijk WA. Optimizing the pathway for simple stable fractures. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:728-734. [PMID: 37777203 PMCID: PMC10541994 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.410.bjo-2023-0079.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) can request radiographs. After a radiologically diagnosed fracture, patients are immediately referred to the emergency department (ED). Since 2020, the Máxima Medical Centre has implemented a new care pathway for minor trauma patients, referring them immediately to the traumatology outpatient clinic (OC) instead of the ED. We investigated whether this altered care pathway leads to a reduction in healthcare consumption and concomitant costs. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients were included if a radiologist diagnosed a fracture on a radiograph requested by the GP from August to October 2019 (control group) or August to October 2020 (research group), on weekdays between 8.30 am and 4.00 pm. The study compared various outcomes between groups, including the length of the initial hospital visit, frequency of hospital visits and medical procedures, extent of imaging, and healthcare expenses. Results A total of 634 patients were included. The results show a median reduction of 25 minutes in duration of initial hospital visits, one fewer hospital visit, overall fewer medical procedures, and a decrease in healthcare costs of €303.40 per patient in the research group compared to the control group. No difference was found in the amount of imaging. Conclusion The implementation of the new care pathway has resulted in a substantial reduction in healthcare use and costs. Moreover, the pathway provides advantages for patients and helps prevent crowding at the ED. Hence, we recommend immediately referring all minor trauma patients to the traumatology OC instead of the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B. Fokkema
- Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Rudi M. H. Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bakhiet A, Passmore W, Nath U, Das A, Pillai A. Can a Fully Electronic Patient Record-Based Virtual Fracture Clinic Increase Compliance With British Orthopaedic Association Guidelines for the Assessment of Acute Orthopaedic Trauma Patients? Cureus 2023; 15:e46942. [PMID: 37841983 PMCID: PMC10570870 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is clear guidance for the follow-up of acute orthopaedic trauma patients within 72 hours of presentation as per British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) model has been adopted nationwide to increase compliance with these guidelines. Traditionally our VFC was paper-based, but recently it has been made completely electronic with the introduction of Hive which is a comprehensive electronic patient record (EPR). The aim of this audit was to assess the effectiveness of the Hive VFC and to see the impact it has on improving the patient experience. Methods Data was collected retrospectively by looking at referrals to the Hive VFC across a seven-month period from its date of introduction. No patients were excluded and data was collected for 2,158 patients. Patient demographics, referral details, and outcomes were recorded on a Microsoft Excel version 16.0 for Windows spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States). Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results Data was collected for 2,158 patients between September 9, 2022, and March 31, 2023, in the Hive VFC. The largest proportion of injuries was found in the foot and ankle region with 32% of referrals (n=688), followed by hand and wrist with 30% (n=651), upper limb with 28% (n=595), and lower limb with 7% (n=142). There was a 50.4% (n=125) increase in the number of patients seen in the VFC across the study period with 248 patients being seen in September 2022, increasing to 373 in March 2023. The number of patients with acute traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were assessed within 72 hours on average was 94.5% per month. There was an increase of 7.3% during the study period from September 2022 to March 2023, 89.9% to 96.5%, respectively. Conclusion We believe that Hive VFC is a clinically sound and effective way of assessing acute traumatic orthopaedic patients and increasing compliance with BOA and NICE guidelines. The number of patients needing acute orthopaedic assessment is rising steadily, and this should alert us to find more convenient, time and cost-saving methods of delivering safe and effective patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelwakeel Bakhiet
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - William Passmore
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Manchester, Manchester, GBR
| | - Upamanyu Nath
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Abhirun Das
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Anand Pillai
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Menyah E, Garcia SM, McCormack A, Taiwo B, Aly M, Kamel W, Dhinsa BS. Assessing Referrals to a Trauma and Orthopaedic Department: Evaluation of a Traffic Light System for Virtual Fracture Clinic in the Emergency Department and Urgent Care. Cureus 2023; 15:e41316. [PMID: 37539403 PMCID: PMC10395551 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) on-call service receives referrals from the emergency department (ED), general practice (GP) and urgent treatment centres (UTCs) and requests for inpatient reviews. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) pathway allows ED and UTC clinicians to assess, discharge and refer when necessary. For VFC, the on-call orthopaedic consultant reviews the cases the next working day and makes an appropriate plan. This pathway consists of a traffic light system, in which practitioners can either safely discharge with written advice (green), refer to the VFC (yellow) or refer to the on-call team (red). Method The aim of this study was to assess how the VFC pathway was being utilised. All referrals to the T&O on-call team over three weeks were evaluated retrospectively. The following referrals were excluded: fractured femur, head injury, trauma calls and back pain pathway. The following data were collected: patient details, diagnosis, referral source, reason for referral, plan, double booking with VFC and appropriateness. Results A total of 191 referrals were analysed. Most referrals are from the ED (51%) and UTC (23%). Of the referrals, 39% were deemed to be inappropriate. Of the inappropriate referrals, 35% should have been referred directly to the VFC rather than the on-call team. A significant minority (7%) of inappropriate referrals were referred to the on-call team and VFC. Conclusion Education and collaboration are required with the ED and UTC to ensure the proper use of the VFC pathway. Immediate radiograph reporting may also be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effie Menyah
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | - Sean M Garcia
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | - Ann McCormack
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | - Babajide Taiwo
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | - Mohamed Aly
- Orthopaedics, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | - Walid Kamel
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Howard A, Robinson T, Lind A, Pepple S, Chloros GD, Giannoudis PV. Opportunities arising from the COVID-19: an international orthopaedic surgeons' perspective. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:1959-1964. [PMID: 36053293 PMCID: PMC9438355 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03334-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The unprecedented COVID-19 experience has posed severe challenges to the health care system and several of these are documented in orthopaedic surgery; however, although the pandemic has also brought positive changes, these have not been precisely documented. The purpose of this survey is to identify positive perceptions by orthopaedic surgeons at an international level. METHODS A cross-sectional, web-based survey inviting 120 orthopaedic surgeons was conducted in April 2020 querying about the positive lessons COVID-19 would teach us. From all responses, thematic codes were obtained and an exploratory thematic analysis was carried out to determine the prevalent themes. RESULTS A total of 100 responses (83% response rate) from a total of seven countries were received. The variety of responses received were grouped into 13 different thematic codes. The thematic analysis generated two major themes: "Virtual reorganization" and "Wellness and sustainability". Fifty-four per cent of the participants reported positive changes in service reorganization and virtual consultation, whereas 30% replied with an increased feeling of well-being which overlapped with environmental benefits, including reduced paperwork, reduced travelling and increased quality time for family and reflection. CONCLUSIONS Despite the negative aspects of the pandemic, responders reported several positive changes particularly relating to service reorganization and personal well-being. This study prompts further larger scale research to unravel further detail in those positive aspects and strongly enhance our future orthopaedic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Howard
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospital, University of Leeds, George Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - Tom Robinson
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Amy Lind
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospital, University of Leeds, George Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Sophanit Pepple
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - George D Chloros
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospital, University of Leeds, George Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Peter V Giannoudis
- Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospital, University of Leeds, George Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Galloway R, Zahan N, Patil A, Stimler B, Patel A, Parker L, Romans FM, Jeyaseelan L. Short term clinical and patient reported outcomes following Virtual Fracture Clinic management of fifth metatarsal fractures. Injury 2023:110853. [PMID: 37308337 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fracture clinics are experiencing increased referrals and decreased capacity. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for specified injury presentations. There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of a VFC model in the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in VFC. We hypothesise that it is both safe and cost effectiveness. METHODS Patients presenting to VFC at our major trauma centre with a 5th metatarsal base fracture, between January 2019 and December 2019, were included. Patient demographics, clinic appointments, complication and operative rates were analysed. Patients received standardised VFC treatment; walker boot/full weight bearing, rehabilitation information and instructions to contact VFC if symptoms of pain persist after 4 months. Minimum follow-up was one year; Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ) were distributed. A basic cost analysis was performed. RESULTS 126 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 41.6 years (18-92). Average time from ED attendance to VFC review was 2 days (1 - 5). Fractures were classified according to the Lawrence and Botte Classification with 104 (82%) zone 1 fractures, 15 (12%) zone 2 fractures and 7 (6%) zone 3 fractures. At VFC, 125/126 were discharged. 12 patients (9.5%) arranged further follow-up after initial discharge; pain the reason in all cases. There was 1 non-union during the study period. Average MOXFQ score post 1 year was 0.4/64, with only 11 patients scoring more than 0. In total, 248 face-to-face clinic visits were saved. CONCLUSION Our experience demonstrates that the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in the VFC setting, with a well-defined protocol, can prove safe, efficient, cost effective and yield good short term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Galloway
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP United Kingdom.
| | - Nusrat Zahan
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| | - Amogh Patil
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| | - Batya Stimler
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| | - Amit Patel
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| | - Lee Parker
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| | | | - Luckshmana Jeyaseelan
- Barts Bone & Joint Health, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thomas-Jones I, Kocialkowski C, Dominguez E, Williams J. Lessons From the Virtual Fracture Clinic: An Efficient Model With Satisfied Patients. Cureus 2022; 14:e30413. [PMID: 36407215 PMCID: PMC9669813 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) can be an effective means of managing specific musculoskeletal injuries, including through protocol-driven direct discharge from the emergency department (ED) or minor injury unit (MIU). This study aimed to measure the efficiency of the VFC triage process while quantifying patient satisfaction after direct discharge from the VFC without routine face-to-face review. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database to ascertain VFC outcomes for 9064 patients from February 2017 to July 2018. We analysed consultant variation in VFC review and the mean time taken per patient. Patient satisfaction was investigated in 100 chronological patients initially managed via the VFC. Results The mean time to triage each patient was 74 seconds, and a mean of 503 patients was triaged each month. The telephone helpline received a mean of 0.9 calls per week. Seventy-seven percent of patients stated they were happy to be managed without a fracture clinic appointment, and 82% of patients received virtual leaflets in the ED or MIU as per protocol. The number of fracture clinic appointments was reduced by 24% as patients were discharged directly or seen instead by allied health professionals. The median patient satisfaction with VFC management was 90%, and the mean satisfaction with VFC communication was 80%. Conclusion Virtual review of fracture clinic referral enables stratification of patients according to clinical urgency and saves patients from attending unnecessary appointments. This is achieved in a patient population generally satisfied with their overall management. Our study results support the growing trend of VFCs as pivotal systems in streamlining the care of musculoskeletal injuries while adhering to British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma guidelines for Fracture Clinic Services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iolo Thomas-Jones
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, GBR
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | | | - Elizabeth Dominguez
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, GBR
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| | - James Williams
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Intervention rates are low after direct discharge from the Edinburgh trauma triage clinic: Outcomes of 6,688 patients. Injury 2022; 53:3269-3275. [PMID: 35965131 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM The Edinburgh Trauma Triage clinic (TTC) is an established form of Virtual Fracture clinic (VFC) that permits the direct discharge of simple, isolated fractures from the Emergency Department (ED). Small, short-term cohort studies of similar systems have been published, but to detect low rates of complications requires a large study sample and longer-term follow-up. This study details the outcomes of all patients with injuries suitable for a direct discharge protocol over a four-year period, reviewed at a minimum of three years after attendance. PATIENTS All TTC records between February 2014 and December 2017 were collated from a prospective database. Fractures of the radial head, little finger metacarpal, fifth metatarsal, toe phalanges and mallet finger injuries were included. TTC outcome, including any deviations from a well-established direct discharge protocol, were noted. All records were re-assessed at a minimum of 36 months after TTC triage (mean 54 months) to ascertain which injuries attended the trauma clinic after initial discharge. Reasons for attendance, the source of referral and any subsequent surgical procedures were identified. RESULTS There were 6688 patients with fractures of the radial head (1861), little finger metacarpal (1621), fifth metatarsal (1916), toe phalanges (920) and mallet finger injuries (370). 298 (6%) patients were re-referred after direct discharge and attended trauma clinic at a mean time after injury of 11.9 weeks, of whom 11 (0.2%) underwent a surgical intervention. Serious adverse events, defined as those in which a patient may not have come to harm if early clinical review had been undertaken, occurred in 1 patient (0.01%). CONCLUSION Intervention after direct discharge of simple pre-defined injuries of the elbow, hand and foot is low. Within a TTC system, patients with these injuries can be safely discharged without routine follow-up.
Collapse
|
13
|
Miller P, Hurley R, McCabe F, Turley L, O'Flanagan S, O'Shea K. Modified trauma assessment clinic: A rapid, scalable model. J Orthop 2022; 30:59-61. [PMID: 35241889 PMCID: PMC8857545 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trauma Assessment Clinic (TAC) has become a very useful tool in managing busy trauma clinics and reducing attendances. There is good evidence of safety and efficacy. Extension of pre-existing TAC during the COVID pandemic has proven successful. Rapid start-up models for establishing TACs are not well described in the literature. This study aimed to prove that a modified TAC has similar efficacy and can be initiated in rapid start-up manner with minimal cost. METHODS A new electronic pathway of referral with a template was created between the Emergency Department (ED) and the Orthopaedic department. RESULTS Following introduction of our modified TAC 32% of patients referred to the TAC did not require in-person review thereby avoiding any additional hospital visit. Average time to first in-person review appointment was 15 days. Combining these, the projected reduction in all fracture clinic attendance was 48%. CONCLUSION This paper describes the process of how a major teaching and tertiary referral orthopaedic unit developed an accelerated establishment process for a Trauma Assessment Clinic as an alternative to the traditional "Glasgow model". This can be instituted quickly, safely, and is scalable for use in a large hospital. The template provided can be used as a guide or "blueprint" should other orthopaedic departments require a rapid start-up of a Trauma Assessment Clinic.
Collapse
|
14
|
Merchant RM, Khan SA, Douglas C, Edel P, Khan T, Eastwood DM. A Virtual Clinic for DDH Pavlik Harness Monitoring. J Pediatr Orthop 2022; 42:e149-e153. [PMID: 34839312 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pavlik harness (PH) treatment is successful in treating over 90% of newborns with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). There is a need for close supervision, frequent adjustments, size changes, and monitoring of complications. This paper aims to provide a safe criterion for remote follow-up of DDH patients treated in a PH to reduce the risk of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) exposure to patients, parents, and health practitioners. METHODS All infants with stable hips (Graf I, IIa/b/c/d, treated III/IV) with consenting parents after appropriate counseling were enrolled in a virtual clinic. Clinics were conducted using the NHS "Attend anywhere" virtual link service by an extended scope practitioner-specialist physiotherapist and a clinical nurse specialist. The virtual clinic group was compared with a matched cohort of patients from 2018/2019. RESULTS A total of 141 patients were referred to the neonatal hip clinic; 45 patients were eligible for harness treatment and 20 patients were selected for virtual clinics. In total, there were 35 virtual clinic appointments. Each of the patients had an average of 1.7 virtual appointments ranging from 1 to 3 (26.3% of total number of clinics). Age at presentation of the treated group was 7±4.2 weeks and control group 5.7±5.5 weeks (P=0.59). PH duration of the study group was 9±2.6 weeks and the control group, 7.8±2.5 weeks (P=0.12). There were no missed complications at the follow-up face-to-face appointment. Patients saved an average of 76 km total travel distance. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates adequate evidence that children requiring routine follow-up appointments involving PH adjustment, skincare, and identification of clinical anomalies, can be treated and followed up safely using virtual clinics. Clinical triage of suitable patients for virtual clinic provision must always be made by experienced clinicians. Children presenting with Graf IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, as well as those with stable and improving Graf III at initial diagnoses, had successful treatment with virtual clinic follow-up appointments in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Penina Edel
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Tahir Khan
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Madhusudan N, Lewis T, Kunicki A, Hardie J, Macleod I, Marsland D. The introduction of the trauma triage clinic at a district general hospital: safety and efficacy during the first year of implementation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021; 104:340-345. [PMID: 34939841 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previously published work has shown that there are no missed injuries following the introduction of a trauma triage clinic (TTC). This study aimed to assess both the safety and efficacy of the TTC model in a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. We aimed to assess the rate of missed 'high-risk' injuries, including posterior shoulder dislocations, talar injuries, Lisfranc injuries and complex carpal instability. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively between November 2017 and October 2018 (inclusive). During this time, 3,721 patients were reviewed (mean age 38 years, SD 25.5, range 1-103 years). Case notes and x-rays were reviewed for all patients. Compliance was assessed against British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST 7) guidelines for fracture clinic services. The standard for adherence to guidelines was 100%. RESULTS Thirty-two of 3,721 patients had a missed injury during the study period, and 66% of these injuries were high risk. TTC was effective in reducing the number of patients seen in the fracture clinic, with 23% of patients discharged directly from the TTC. Eighty-nine per cent of patients were reviewed in clinic within 72 hours of presentation, with a median time to review of 2 days. CONCLUSION This study has shown that TTC is efficient in reducing the burden of patients seen in the fracture clinic, but it is not as safe as reported previously. Although the prevalence of missed injuries is low, hospitals introducing a TTC model should consider departmental processes to help accurately identify and triage high-risk injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Madhusudan
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - T Lewis
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Kunicki
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - J Hardie
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - I Macleod
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - D Marsland
- Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Geerdink TH, Verbist J, van Dongen JM, Haverlag R, van Veen RN, Goslings JC. Direct discharge of patients with simple stable musculoskeletal injuries as an alternative to routine follow-up: a systematic review of the current literature. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 48:2589-2605. [PMID: 34529086 PMCID: PMC9360121 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01784-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is growing evidence that patients with certain simple stable musculoskeletal injuries can be discharged directly from the Emergency Department (ED), without compromising patient outcome and experience. This study aims to review the literature on the effects of direct discharge (DD) of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries, regarding healthcare utilization, costs, patient outcome and experience. METHODS A systematic review was performed in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science using PRISMA guidelines. Comparative and non-comparative studies on DD of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries from the ED in an adult/paediatric/mixed population were included if reporting ≥ 1 of: (1) logistic outcomes: DD rate (proportion of patients discharged directly); number of follow-up appointments; DD return rate; (2) costs; (3) patient outcomes/experiences: functional outcome; treatment satisfaction; adverse outcomes; other. RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included (92% conducted in the UK). Seven studies (27%) assessed functional outcome, nine (35%) treatment satisfaction, and ten (38%) adverse outcomes. A large proportion of studies defined DD eligibility criteria as injuries being minor/simple/stable, without further detail. ED DD rate was 26.7-59.5%. Mean number of follow-up appointments was 1.00-2.08 pre-DD, vs. 0.00-0.33 post-DD. Return rate was 0.0-19.4%. Costs per patient were reduced by €69-€210 (ranging from - 38.0 to - 96.6%) post-DD. Functional outcome and treatment satisfaction levels were 'equal' or 'better' (comparative studies), and 'high' (non-comparative studies), post-DD. Adverse outcomes were low and comparable. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review supports the idea that DD of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries from the ED provides an opportunity to reduce healthcare utilization and costs without compromising patient outcomes/experiences. To improve comparability and facilitate implementation/external validation of DD, future studies should provide detailed DD eligibility criteria, and use a standard set of outcomes. Systematic review registration number: 120779, date of first registration: 12/02/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H Geerdink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J Verbist
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Haverlag
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R N van Veen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J C Goslings
- Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kennedy J, Blackburn C, Barrett M, O’Toole P, Moore D. One and done? Outcomes from 3961 patients managed via a virtual fracture clinic pathway for paediatric fractures. J Child Orthop 2021; 15:186-193. [PMID: 34211594 PMCID: PMC8223081 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this paper is to describe our experience with a virtual fracture management pathway in the setting of a paediatric trauma service. METHODS All patients referred to the virtual fracture clinic service from the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) were prospectively collected. Outcome data of interest (patients discharged, referred for urgent operative treatment, referred back to emergency department for further evaluation, referred for face-to-face clinical assessment and all patients who re-presented on an unplanned basis for further management of the index injury) were compiled and collated. Cost analysis was performed using established costing for a virtual fracture clinic within the Irish Healthcare System. RESULTS There were a total of 3961 patients referred to the virtual fracture clinic from the PED. Of these, 70% (n = 2776) were discharged. In all, 26% (n = 1033) were referred to a face-to-face appointment. Of discharged patients, 7.5% (n = 207) required an unplanned face-to-face evaluation. A total of 0.1% (n = 3) subsequently required operative treatment relating to their index injury. Implementation of the virtual fracture clinic model generated calculated savings of €254 120. CONCLUSION This prospective evaluation has demonstrated that a virtual fracture clinic pathway for minor paediatric trauma is safe, effective and brings significant cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Kennedy
- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland.,Correspondence should be sent to Mr Jim Kennedy, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland. E-mail:
| | - Carol Blackburn
- Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland
| | - Michael Barrett
- Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland
| | - Patrick O’Toole
- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland
| | - David Moore
- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12 N512, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ng ZH, Downie S, Makaram NS, Kolhe SN, Mackenzie SP, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, White TO. A multicentre national study of the effectiveness of virtual fracture clinic management of orthopaedic trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic (MAVCOV): a cross-sectional study protocol. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:211-215. [PMID: 33752474 PMCID: PMC8009904 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.23.bjo-2020-0191.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are advocated by recent British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOASTs) to efficiently manage injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary aim of this national study is to assess the impact of these standards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcome amid the pandemic. The secondary aims are to determine the impact of the pandemic on the demographic details of injuries presenting to the VFC, and to compare outcomes and satisfaction when the BOAST guidelines were first introduced with a subsequent period when local practice would be familiar with these guidelines. Methods This is a national cross-sectional cohort study comprising centres with VFC services across the UK. All consecutive adult patients assessed in VFC in a two-week period pre-lockdown (6 May 2019 to 19 May 2019) and in the same two-week period at the peak of the first lockdown (4 May 2020 to 17 May 2020), and a randomly selected sample during the ‘second wave’ (October 2020) will be eligible for the study. Data comprising local VFC practice, patient and injury characteristics, unplanned re-attendances, and complications will be collected by local investigators for all time periods. A telephone questionnaire will be used to determine patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes for patients who were discharged following VFC assessment without face-to-face consultation. Ethics and dissemination The study results will identify changes in case-mix and numbers of patients managed through VFCs and whether this is safe and associated with patient satisfaction. These data will provide key information for future expert-led consensus on management of trauma injuries through the VFC. The protocol will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed publication. This protocol has been reviewed by the South East Scotland Research Ethics Service and is classified as a multicentre audit. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):211–215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhan H Ng
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Navnit S Makaram
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shivam N Kolhe
- Newcastle University Medical School, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Samuel P Mackenzie
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicholas D Clement
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew D Duckworth
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Timothy O White
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|