Open elbow arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: an update

Does tranexamic acid diminish hemorrhage and pain in open elbow arthrolysis? a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Effective hemostasis has the potential to reduce inflammation and pain, leading to potential benefits in the early rehabilitation of patients who undergo elbow arthrolysis. In the present study, we aim to assesse the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) on elbow arthrolysis postoperative blood loss, patients' pain perception according to the visual analog scale (VAS), elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library. We included controlled trials, either randomized (RCT) or non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) comparing the effects of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) treatment with placebo/no treatment on postoperative blood loss, pain VAS score, elbow ROM, and complications, in patients who underwent open or closed elbow arthrolysis surgery.

RESULTS

One RCT, and three NRSIs met eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis determined that tranexamic acid application reduced drain output 34 mm on average (WMD: -34.00; 95% CI: -49.45, -18.55). There was a discrepancy among included articles in terms of intra-operative blood loss; although the study with the largest sample size (291 and 296 patients in the case and control groups, respectively) reported reduced intra-operative blood loss in patients who received TXA. The pooled estimation for the pain VAS score on the first day post-operatively indicates a reduction in pain among patients in the TXA group (WMD: -0.82; 95% CI: -1.36, -0.28). Results for ROM, and complications' rate such as hematoma and ulnar nerve palsy were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TXA may be beneficial to reduce elbow arthrolysis bleeding volume. However, it dose not seem to affect final elbow ROM and patients' pain score. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to draw a robust conclusion on this topic.

Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) may substantially affect the patient's functional range of motion and quality of life. Open elbow release has been extensively studied, but arthroscopic techniques are limited, particularly in differentiating between post-traumatic and non-traumatic stiffness. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic release of PTES regarding the range of motion (ROM), pain, functional assessment, and complications.

METHODS

A prospective cohort was conducted on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis for PTES, with 32 patients included in the final analysis. The ROM was measured using the orthopedic goniometer. Grip strength was measured using the Camry digital hand dynamometer (Camry, CA, USA) and compared to their contralateral side. The functional status of the patients was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)andthe Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). All measurements were done before surgery and at the last follow-up visit. Pre-operative and post-operative changes in MEPI, ASES, and visual analog (VAS) scores were compared with the paired t-test.

RESULTS

After surgery, the ROM significantly improved from 74 ± 11 to 110 ± 15 degrees (p<0.001). Additionally, the ASES score and MEPI index both significantly improved from 69 ± 3.4 to 79 ± 6.3 and from 64 ± 5.7 to 82 ± 8, respectively (p<0.001). VAS scores also significantly improved from 1.1 ± 0.87 to 0.31 ± 0.53 at rest (p<0.001). The complication rate was 12%, including three transient ulnar nerve paresthesia and one superficial infection. Post-traumatic elbow release was more offered in distal humerus fractures (53%), followed by proximal ulna fracture/dislocations (25%).

CONCLUSION

We believe that arthroscopic arthrolysis is a safe and reliable treatment of PTES, which improves joint visibility and reduces pain. Patients can be counseled regarding the risk of a secondary surgery following distal humerus or proximal ulna fractures, including the expected recovery and complication rate.

A new prognostic nomogram for heterotopic ossification formation after elbow trauma : the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction (STEHOP) model

AIMS

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries.

METHODS

This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.

RESULTS

Male sex, obesity, open wound, dislocations, late definitive surgical treatment, and lack of use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were identified as adverse predictors and incorporated to construct the STEHOP model. It displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.84). A high C-index value of 0.77 could still be reached in the internal validation. The calibration plot showed good agreement between nomogram prediction and observed outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed STEHOP model is a valid and convenient instrument to predict HO formation after surgery for elbow trauma. It could assist clinicians in counselling patients regarding treatment expectations and therapeutic choices. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):963-971.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for open elbow arthrolysis : the Shanghai Prediction model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram to predict the probability of gaining a functional range of motion (ROM ≥ 120°) after open arthrolysis of the elbow in patients with post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow.

METHODS

We developed the Shanghai Prediction Model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome (SPESSO) based on a dataset of 551 patients who underwent open arthrolysis of the elbow in four institutions. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize the selection of relevant features. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to build the SPESSO. Its prediction performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration graph. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.

RESULTS

BMI, the duration of stiffness, the preoperative ROM, the preoperative intensity of pain, and grade of post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow were identified as predictors of outcome and incorporated to construct the nomogram. SPESSO displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.81). A high C-index value of 0.70 could still be reached in the interval validation. The calibration graph showed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and the outcome.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed SPESSO is a valid and convenient model which can be used to predict the outcome of open arthrolysis of the elbow. It could assist clinicians in counselling patients regarding the choice and expectations of treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):486-494.

What are the prevalence of and factors independently associated with depression and anxiety among patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness? A cross-sectional, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Joint stiffness is a common complication after articular-related trauma in the elbow, resulting in significant limb disability, psychological stress, and a negative impact on daily life. No previous study has reported the impact of post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) on psychological health. This study aims to (1) investigate the depression and anxiety levels and (2) identify factors independently associated with depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with PTES.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with PTES presenting to 4 collaborative municipal hospitals were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected through questionnaires and medical records. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 was used to assess depression and anxiety status. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with depression and anxiety symptoms.

RESULTS

The detection rates of mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety are 40.7% and 27.8%, and severe-to-extremely severe levels are 23.1% and 25.9%, respectively. Regression results show that factors independently associated with depression include elbow flexion (odds ratio [OR]_{per 1° loss} = 1.021, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.041, P = .035), elbow pain on movement (OR_{per 1 point increase} = 1.236, 95% CI: 1.029-1.484, P = .023), family relationship (OR_{less close/very close} = 10.059, 95% CI: 2.170-46.633, P = .003), and self-care ability (OR_unable/able = 3.858, 95% CI: 1.244-11.961, P = .019). Factors independently associated with anxiety are elbow flexion (OR_{per 1° loss} = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.009-1.052, P = .005), elbow pain on movement (OR_{per 1 point increase} = 1.212, 95% CI: 1.003-1.465, P = .047), and clinically significant heterotopic ossification around elbow (OR_yes/no = 2.344, 95% CI: 1.048-5.243, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PTES exhibit significant depression and anxiety symptoms. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are independently associated with depression and anxiety levels. Identifying and addressing these factors may be of particular benefit during PTES management. Future research might address whether depression and anxiety affect the outcome after stiff elbow surgery.

How effective is periarticular multimodal drug injection in open elbow arthrolysis? A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) in open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) is limited. This study aimed to investigate differences in postoperative pain, blood loss, and range of motion (ROM) between PMDI vs. no injection among patients undergoing OEA, and the presence of PMDI-related complications.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial included 59 patients who underwent OEA. Patients randomly received PMDI (ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketoprofen) before wound closure or no injection. The primary outcomes were elbow pain over the first postoperative week at rest and during motion, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS scores were compared to attain the 20-mm threshold values for a minimum clinically important difference. Parecoxib consumption on OEA night and postoperative days (PODs) 1-3 and total consumption during the first postoperative week were recorded. Blood loss was recorded every 24 hours until POD 3. ROM during rehabilitation was measured daily from day 1 to day 7 after surgery, as well as at 3-month follow-up. Medication-related side effects were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

The mean VAS score showed clinically important differences between PMDI and control groups at rest on OEA night (mean difference [MD], 25 mm; P < .001) and first 3 PODs with motion (POD 1: MD, 28 mm, P < .001; POD 2: MD, 21 mm, P < .001; POD 3: MD, 21 mm, P < .001) but not in other postoperative assessments. Parecoxib consumption was lower in the PMDI group on OEA night and PODs 1-3. Total parecoxib consumption during the first postoperative week was lower in the PMDI group vs. the control group (MD, 148 mg; P < .001). Blood drainage was less in the PMDI group vs. the control group on POD 1 (MD, 38 mL; P = .016) but not on POD 2 (P = .950), POD 3 (P = .259), or total (P = .184). The PMDI group exhibited significantly better ROM during the first 4 PODs than the control group, whereas there was no difference at 3-month follow-up. No medication-related side effects were noted in the PMDI group.

CONCLUSION

PMDI effectively relieves pain and reduces analgesic consumption for OEA patients, without an apparent increase in risks.

Heterotopic ossification formation after fractures about the elbow

INTRODUCTION

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known sequela after an elbow injury and is widely studied given the associated morbidity. The anatomic location of HO development for specific elbow injuries has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to describe the precise, anatomic location of HO development after different peri-articular elbow injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with peri-articular elbow fracture and/or dislocation who underwent an elbow contracture release. The injuries were grouped into coronal shear distal humerus/AO 13.B3 (CSDH), distal humerus/AO 13.A, 13.B1, B2 or 13.C (DH), olecranon/AO 21.B1 (OL), radial head/AO 21.B2 (RH), extra-articular proximal radius and ulna/AO 21.A (EAPRU) fractures and elbow dislocations (DL). The HO location was determined by reviewing elbow radiographs and CT scans and were classified as anterior capsule, medial or lateral collateral ligaments, and posterior capsule/triceps insertion.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 49 patients, such as 6 CSDH, 13 DH, 6 OL, 21 RH, 4 EAPRU fractures and 20 elbow DL. All CSDH and RH fractures and 19/20 elbow DL developed HO in the collateral ligaments, while 12/13 DH fractures developed an anterior capsule HO. All 6 OL fractures developed HO posteriorly, and 3/4 EAPRU fractures developed a proximal radioulnar synostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the location of HO development is specific to the injury type and is influenced by the soft tissues involved. This is consistent with the understanding that HO is the abnormal ossification of normal structures.