Prognostic factors for predicting health-related quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures: a randomized controlled trial

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) in Severe Lower Extremity Trauma: Pooled Data from 7 Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is a well validated, widely used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for orthopaedic patients. Despite its widespread use and acceptance, this measure does not have an agreed upon minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The purpose of the present study was to create distributional MCIDs with use of a large cohort of research participants with severe lower extremity fractures.

METHODS

Three distributional approaches were used to calculate MCIDs for the Dysfunction and Bother Indices of the SMFA as well as all its domains: (1) half of the standard deviation (one-half SD), (2) twice the standard error of measurement (2SEM), and (3) minimal detectable change (MDC). In addition to evaluating by patient characteristics and the timing of assessment, we reviewed these calculations across several injury groups likely to affect functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 4,298 SMFA assessments were collected from 3,185 patients who had undergone surgical treatment of traumatic injuries of the lower extremity at 60 Level-I trauma centers across 7 multicenter, prospective clinical studies. Depending on the statistical approach used, the MCID associated with the overall sample ranged from 7.7 to 10.7 for the SMFA Dysfunction Index and from 11.0 to 16.8 for the SMFA Bother Index. For the Dysfunction Index, the variability across the scores was small (<5%) within the sex and age subgroups but was modest (12% to 18%) across subgroups related to assessment timing.

CONCLUSIONS

A defensible MCID can be found between 7 and 11 points for the Dysfunction Index and between 11 and 17 points for the Bother Index. The precise choice of MCID may depend on the preferred statistical approach and the population under study. While differences exist between MCID values based on the calculation method, values were consistent across the categories of the various subgroups presented.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessing the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in a low-income setting: a prospective study in Yemen

BACKGROUND

Tibial shaft fractures are common injuries that can be treated with various methods, including interlocked intramedullary nail (IMN). However, there is limited data on the clinical outcomes of IMN for tibial shaft fractures in Yemen.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary IMN for tibial shaft fractures in Yemen.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 134 patients who underwent primary IMN for tibial shaft fractures et al.-Thawra Modern General Hospital in Sana'a, Yemen, between June 2016 and June 2020. The patients were between 18 and 70 years old, and the fractures were classified according to the AO classification system. The fractures were treated with IMN using a standard technique. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The outcome measures included union time, complications, and functional scores.

RESULTS

The mean union time was 17 weeks. The overall complication rate was 18.7%. The most common complications were infection (8.2%), delayed union (6.7%), and nonunion (3.7%). The mean functional scores at the final follow-up were 91.4 for the Knee Society Score and 90.2 for the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score.

CONCLUSION

Primary IMN is an effective and reliable method for treating tibial shaft fractures in Yemen, with acceptable union time, complication rate, and functional outcomes.

Health disparities in orthopedic trauma: a qualitative study examining providers' perspectives on barriers to care and recovery outcomes

Social workers involved in interdisciplinary orthopedic trauma care can benefit from the knowledge of providers' perspectives on healthcare disparities in this field. Using qualitative data from focus groups conducted on 79 orthopedic care providers at three Level 1 trauma centers, we assessed their perspectives on orthopedic trauma healthcare disparities and discussed potential solutions. Focus groups originally aimed to detect barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a trial of a live video mind-body intervention to aid in recovery in orthopedic trauma care settings (Toolkit for Optimal Recovery-TOR). We used the Socio-Ecological Model to analyze an emerging code of "health disparities" during data analysis to determine at which levels of care these disparities occurred. We identified factors related to health disparities in orthopedic trauma care and outcomes at the Individual (Education- comprehension, health-literacy; Language Barriers; Psychological Health- emotional distress, alcohol/drug use, learned helplessness; Physical Health- obesity, smoking; and Access to Technology), Relationship (Social Support Network), Community (Transportation and Employment Security), and Societal level (Access- safe/clean housing, insurance, mental health resources; Culture). We discuss the implications of the findings and provide recommendations to address these issues, with a specific focus on their relevance to the field of social work in health care.

Surgical factors associated with symptomatic implant removal after patella fracture

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether certain types of fixation and other factors associated with the fixation could be identified that predict an increased risk of symptomatic implant removal.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at our urban academic level 1 trauma center. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent operative fixation for patella fracture were included. The primary outcome was symptomatic implant removal after operative fixation.

RESULTS

Of the 186 study patients (mean age, 44 [SD 17] years, 65% male), 53 patients (28.5%) underwent symptomatic implant removal. Modifiable risk factors for symptomatic implant removal included the use of Kirschner (k)-wires (OR: 4.93; 95% CI, 1.89-14.10; p < 0.001), and a trend towards significance for implant prominence >5 mm (OR: 2.57; 95% CI, 0.93-7.93; p = 0.07). Symptomatic implant removal was also less likely in patients >45 years of age (OR: 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34; p < 0.01), of a racial minority (OR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.88; p = 0.03), and a body mass index >25 kg/m² (OR: 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.84; p = 0.02). The final model demonstrated excellent prognostic performance, with an AUC of 0.83 (0.76-0.90).

CONCLUSION

We identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with symptomatic implant removal in patients with patella fractures. Surgeons should be aware that the use of k-wires and any implant prominence exceeding 5 mm might be associated with increased odds of symptomatic implant removal in patients with patella fractures.