1
|
Venkataramanan R, Pradhan A, Kumar A, Alajlani M, Arvanitis TN. Role of digital health in coordinating patient care in a hub-and-spoke hierarchy of cancer care facilities: a scoping review. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1605. [PMID: 37799945 PMCID: PMC10550326 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Coordinating cancer care is complicated due to the involvement of multiple service providers which often leads to fragmentation. The evolution of digital health has led to the development of technology-enabled models of healthcare delivery. This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of the use of digital health in coordinating cancer care via hub-and-spoke models. Methods A scoping review of the literature was undertaken using the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. Research articles published between 2010 and 2022 were retrieved from four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Reviews and Global Health Library). The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for the scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist were followed to present the findings. Result In total, 311 articles were found of which 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. The use of videoconferencing was predominant across all the studies. The number of spokes varied across the studies ranging from 1 to 63. Three studies aimed to evaluate the impact on access to cancer care among patients, two studies were related to capacity building of the health care workers at the spoke sites, one study was based on a peer review of radiotherapy plans, and one study was related to risk assessment and patient navigation. The introduction of digital health led to reduced travel time and waiting period for patients, and standardisation of radiotherapy plans at spokes. Tele-mentoring intervention aimed at capacity-building resulted in higher confidence and increased knowledge among the spoke learners. Conclusion There is limited evidence for the role of digital health in the hub-and-spoke design. Although all the studies have highlighted the digital components being used to coordinate care, the bottlenecks, Which were overcome during the implementation of the interventions and the impact on cancer outcomes, need to be rigorously analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramachandran Venkataramanan
- Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK
- Strategy and Research Wing, Karkinos Healthcare, Mumbai 400086, India
| | - Akash Pradhan
- Strategy and Research Wing, Karkinos Healthcare, Mumbai 400086, India
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Strategy and Research Wing, Karkinos Healthcare, Mumbai 400086, India
| | - Mohannad Alajlani
- Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL Coventry, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Q, Zhang H, Chen Z, Guo Y, George TJ, Chen Y, Wang F, Bian J. Validation of Real-World Data-based Endpoint Measures of Cancer Treatment Outcomes. AMIA ... ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS. AMIA SYMPOSIUM 2022; 2021:716-725. [PMID: 35308944 PMCID: PMC8861715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Recently, there has been a growing interest in using real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence that complements clinical trials. To quantify treatment effects, it is important to develop meaningful RWD-based endpoints. In cancer trials, two real-world endpoints are of particular interest: real-world overall survival (rwOS) and real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT). In this work, we identified ways to calculate these real-world endpoints with structured electronic health record (EHR) data and validate these endpoints against the gold-standard measurements of these endpoints derived from linked EHR and tumor registry (TR) data. In addition, we examined and reported data quality issues, especially inconsistencies between the EHR and TR data. Using a survival model, we show that the presence of next treatment was not significantly associated with rwOS, but patients who had longer rwTTNT had longer rwOS, validating the use of rwTTNT as a real-world surrogate marker for measuring cancer endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Li
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Yi Guo
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Yong Chen
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Fei Wang
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bayard S, Fasano G, Tamimi RM, Oh PS. Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Address Breast Cancer Disparities. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022; 14:199-204. [PMID: 36091940 PMCID: PMC9440449 DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00457-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, and the leading cause of cancer death. However, racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as rural and underserved populations, face disparities that limit their access to specialty care for breast cancer. To address these disparities, health care providers can leverage an electronic health record (EHR). Recent Findings Few studies have evaluated the potential benefits of using EHRs to address breast cancer disparities, and none of them outlines a standard approach for this effort. However, these studies outline that EHRs can be used to identify and notify patients at risk for breast cancer. These systems can also automate referrals and scheduling for screening and genetic testing, as well as recruit eligible patients for clinical trials. EHRs can also provide educational materials to reduce risks associated with modifiable risk factors, such as physical activity, obesity, and smoking. These systems can also support telemedicine visits and centralize inter-institutional communication to improve treatment adherence and the quality of care. Summary EHRs have tremendous potential to increase accessibility and communication for patients with breast cancer by augmenting patient engagement, improving communication between patients and providers, and strengthening communication among providers. These efforts can reduce breast cancer disparities by increasing breast cancer screening, improving treatment adherence, expanding access to specialty care, and promoting risk-reducing habits among racial and ethnic minority groups and other underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Bayard
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Genevieve Fasano
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Rulla M. Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Pilyung Stephen Oh
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pennington JW, Ruth B, Miller JM, Peterson J, Xu B, Masino A, Krantz I, Manganella J, Gomes T, Stiles D, Kenna M, Hood LJ, Germiller J, Crenshaw EB. Perspective on the Development of a Large-Scale Clinical Data Repository for Pediatric Hearing Research. Ear Hear 2021; 41:231-238. [PMID: 31408044 PMCID: PMC7007829 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The use of "big data" for pediatric hearing research requires new approaches to both data collection and research methods. The widespread deployment of electronic health record systems creates new opportunities and corresponding challenges in the secondary use of large volumes of audiological and medical data. Opportunities include cost-effective hypothesis generation, rapid cohort expansion for rare conditions, and observational studies based on sample sizes in the thousands to tens of thousands. Challenges include finding and forming appropriately skilled teams, access to data, data quality assessment, and engagement with a research community new to big data. The authors share their experience and perspective on the work required to build and validate a pediatric hearing research database that integrates clinical data for over 185,000 patients from the electronic health record systems of three major academic medical centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey W. Pennington
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Byron Ruth
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Miller
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joy Peterson
- Center for Childhood Communication, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Baichen Xu
- Center for Childhood Communication, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aaron Masino
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children’s Hospital Of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ian Krantz
- Division of Human Genetics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Juliana Manganella
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tamar Gomes
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derek Stiles
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret Kenna
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda J. Hood
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John Germiller
- Division of Otolaryngology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E. Bryan Crenshaw
- Center for Childhood Communication, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma Q, Mack M, Shambhu S, McTigue K, Haynes K. Characterization of bariatric surgery and outcomes using administrative claims data in the research network of a nationwide commercial health plan. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:116. [PMID: 33541346 PMCID: PMC7860025 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06074-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The supplementation of electronic health records data with administrative claims data may be used to capture outcome events more comprehensively in longitudinal observational studies. This study investigated the utility of administrative claims data to identify outcomes across health systems using a comparative effectiveness study of different types of bariatric surgery as a model. Methods This observational cohort study identified patients who had bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2015 within the HealthCore Anthem Research Network (HCARN) database in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) common data model. Patients whose procedures were performed in a member facility affiliated with PCORnet Clinical Research Networks (CRNs) were selected. The outcomes included a 30-day composite adverse event (including venous thromboembolism, percutaneous/operative intervention, failure to discharge and death), and all-cause hospitalization, abdominal operation or intervention, and in-hospital death up to 5 years after the procedure. Outcomes were classified as occurring within or outside PCORnet CRN health systems using facility identifiers. Results We identified 4899 patients who had bariatric surgery in one of the PCORnet CRN health systems. For 30-day composite adverse event, the inclusion of HCARN multi-site claims data marginally increased the incidence rate based only on HCARN single-site claims data for PCORnet CRNs from 3.9 to 4.2%. During the 5-year follow-up period, 56.8% of all-cause hospitalizations, 31.2% abdominal operations or interventions, and 32.3% of in-hospital deaths occurred outside PCORnet CRNs. Incidence rates (events per 100 patient-years) were significantly lower when based on claims from a single PCORnet CRN only compared to using claims from all health systems in the HCARN: all-cause hospitalization, 11.0 (95% Confidence Internal [CI]: 10.4, 11.6) to 25.3 (95% CI: 24.4, 26.3); abdominal operations or interventions, 4.2 (95% CI: 3.9, 4.6) to 6.1 (95% CI: 5.7, 6.6); in-hospital death, 0.2 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.27) to 0.3 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.38). Conclusions Short-term inclusion of multi-site claims data only marginally increased the incidence rate computed from single-site claims data alone. Longer-term follow up captured a notable number of events outside of PCORnet CRNs. The findings suggest that supplementing claims data improves the outcome ascertainment in longitudinal observational comparative effectiveness studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06074-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinli Ma
- Translational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore, Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA.
| | - Michael Mack
- Translational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore, Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Sonali Shambhu
- Translational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore, Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kathleen McTigue
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kevin Haynes
- Translational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore, Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson CA, Jin A, Luft HS, Lichtensztajn DY, Allen L, Liang SY, Schumacher BT, Gomez SL. Population-Based Registry Linkages to Improve Validity of Electronic Health Record-Based Cancer Research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:796-806. [PMID: 32066621 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is tremendous potential to leverage the value gained from integrating electronic health records (EHR) and population-based cancer registry data for research. Registries provide diagnosis details, tumor characteristics, and treatment summaries, while EHRs contain rich clinical detail. A carefully conducted cancer registry linkage may also be used to improve the internal and external validity of inferences made from EHR-based studies. METHODS We linked the EHRs of a large, multispecialty, mixed-payer health care system with the statewide cancer registry and assessed the validity of our linked population. For internal validity, we identify patients that might be "missed" in a linkage, threatening the internal validity of an EHR study population. For generalizability, we compared linked cases with all other cancer patients in the 22-county EHR catchment region. RESULTS From an EHR population of 4.5 million, we identified 306,554 patients with cancer, 26% of the catchment region patients with cancer; 22.7% of linked patients were diagnosed with cancer after they migrated away from our health care system highlighting an advantage of system-wide linkage. We observed demographic differences between EHR patients and non-EHR patients in the surrounding region and demonstrated use of selection probabilities with model-based standardization to improve generalizability. CONCLUSIONS Our experiences set the foundation to encourage and inform researchers interested in working with EHRs for cancer research as well as provide context for leveraging linkages to assess and improve validity and generalizability. IMPACT Researchers conducting linkages may benefit from considering one or more of these approaches to establish and evaluate the validity of their EHR-based populations.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Thompson
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
- Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Anqi Jin
- Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California
| | - Harold S Luft
- Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California
| | - Daphne Y Lichtensztajn
- Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Laura Allen
- Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Su-Ying Liang
- Sutter Health Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California
| | - Benjamin T Schumacher
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Scarlett Lin Gomez
- Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hernandez-Boussard T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD. Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:816-822. [PMID: 32066619 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care. METHODS This study includes patients seeking care at an academic medical center, 2008 to 2018. Digital data sources are combined to address missingness, inaccuracy, and noise common to EHR data. Clinical concepts were identified and extracted from EHR unstructured data using natural language processing (NLP) and machine/deep learning techniques. All models are trained, tested, and validated on independent data samples using standard metrics. RESULTS We provide use cases for using EHR data to assess guideline adherence and quality measurements among patients with cancer. Pretreatment assessment was evaluated by guideline adherence and quality metrics for cancer staging metrics. Our studies in perioperative quality focused on medications administered and guideline adherence. Patient outcomes included treatment-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Advanced technologies applied to EHRs present opportunities to advance population-level quality assessment, to learn from routinely collected clinical data for personalized treatment guidelines, and to augment epidemiologic and population health studies. The effective use of digital data can inform patient-valued care, quality initiatives, and policy guidelines. IMPACT A comprehensive set of health data analyzed with advanced technologies results in a unique resource that facilitates wide-ranging, innovative, and impactful research on prostate cancer. This work demonstrates new ways to use the EHRs and technology to advance epidemiologic studies and benefit oncologic care.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California. .,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Douglas W Blayney
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - James D Brooks
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shi Q, Shambhu S, Marshall A, Rose-Kennedy E, Robertson H, Paullin M, Jones WS, Cziraky M, Haynes K. Role of health plan administrative claims data in participant recruitment for pragmatic clinical trials: An Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) example. Clin Trials 2020; 17:212-222. [DOI: 10.1177/1740774520902989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate HealthCore/Anthem Research Network recruitment strategies, compare response and enrollment rates for different recruitment strategies, and describe demographic and clinical characteristics of responders and enrollees. Methods: HealthCore/Anthem Research Network, a part of the Health Plan Research Network of the Patient-Centered Clinical Data Research Network, used administrative claims data to identify eligible health plan members for potential participation in the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness study. We approached health plan members, identified with a validated Patient-Centered Clinical Data Research Network common data model computable phenotype, and their clinical providers during November 2017 to August 2018. Providers were offered the option to exclude their patients’ participation in Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness prior to our direct patient (member) outreach. Member identification was in two phases: Phase 1: 1 January 2006 to 1 April 2017, and Phase 2: 1 January 2006 to 2 February 2018. Phase 1 consisted of two batches of mail and one phone call per patient. In Phase 2, which included two similar batches of patients, outreach was via either mail or brochure and one phone call. Results: Phase 1 and Phase 2 included 133,373 and 51,777 members, respectively. We engaged 28,593 providers in Phase 1, and 5077 in Phase 2. In Phase 1, 264,158 mixed email/mail messages were delivered to 133,373 members, followed by 90,481 phone calls from November 2017 to February 2018. In Phase 2, after simple randomization to letter or brochure, 51,777 members were sent email/mail or mailed brochure in three waves from May 2018 to July 2018. In this 9-week period, 51,623 communications were sent to 25,914 members in the email/mail group, and 50,160 brochures to 25,863 in the brochure group. Following email/mail or mailed brochure outreach, 16,624 and 16,580 calls were made to the groups, respectively. Overall, 1549 health plan members visited the study portal by 1 September 2018; 355 electronically signed the Informed Consent Form and enrolled. Mailed brochures drove more portal visits in Phase 2, but a lower percentage of responders enrolled. Recruitment was better in Phase 2—2.3 enrollees per 1000 outreach members versus 1.8 in Phase 1. Conclusion: This study showed the ability of a health plan within Patient-Centered Clinical Data Research Network to identify potential study participants with administrative claims, and use different outreach methods to facilitate recruitment and enrollment for pragmatic clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Holly Robertson
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salvucci M, Zakaria Z, Carberry S, Tivnan A, Seifert V, Kögel D, Murphy BM, Prehn JHM. System-based approaches as prognostic tools for glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1092. [PMID: 31718568 PMCID: PMC6852738 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evasion of apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer. Understanding this process holistically and overcoming apoptosis resistance is a goal of many research teams in order to develop better treatment options for cancer patients. Efforts are also ongoing to personalize the treatment of patients. Strategies to confirm the therapeutic efficacy of current treatments or indeed to identify potential novel additional options would be extremely beneficial to both clinicians and patients. In the past few years, system medicine approaches have been developed that model the biochemical pathways of apoptosis. These systems tools incorporate and analyse the complex biological networks involved. For their successful integration into clinical practice, it is mandatory to integrate systems approaches with routine clinical and histopathological practice to deliver personalized care for patients. RESULTS We review here the development of system medicine approaches that model apoptosis for the treatment of cancer with a specific emphasis on the aggressive brain cancer, glioblastoma. CONCLUSIONS We discuss the current understanding in the field and present new approaches that highlight the potential of system medicine approaches to influence how glioblastoma is diagnosed and treated in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Salvucci
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Zaitun Zakaria
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Steven Carberry
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Amanda Tivnan
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Volker Seifert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Donat Kögel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Brona M. Murphy
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Jochen H. M. Prehn
- Centre for Systems Medicine, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ling AY, Kurian AW, Caswell-Jin JL, Sledge GW, Shah NH, Tamang SR. Using natural language processing to construct a metastatic breast cancer cohort from linked cancer registry and electronic medical records data. JAMIA Open 2019; 2:528-537. [PMID: 32025650 PMCID: PMC6994019 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Most population-based cancer databases lack information on metastatic recurrence. Electronic medical records (EMR) and cancer registries contain complementary information on cancer diagnosis, treatment and outcome, yet are rarely used synergistically. To construct a cohort of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, we applied natural language processing techniques within a semisupervised machine learning framework to linked EMR-California Cancer Registry (CCR) data. Materials and Methods We studied all female patients treated at Stanford Health Care with an incident breast cancer diagnosis from 2000 to 2014. Our database consisted of structured fields and unstructured free-text clinical notes from EMR, linked to CCR, a component of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER). We identified de novo MBC patients from CCR and extracted information on distant recurrences from patient notes in EMR. Furthermore, we trained a regularized logistic regression model for recurrent MBC classification and evaluated its performance on a gold standard set of 146 patients. Results There were 11 459 breast cancer patients in total and the median follow-up time was 96.3 months. We identified 1886 MBC patients, 512 (27.1%) of whom were de novo MBC patients and 1374 (72.9%) were recurrent MBC patients. Our final MBC classifier achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.917, with sensitivity 0.861, specificity 0.878, and accuracy 0.870. Discussion and Conclusion To enable population-based research on MBC, we developed a framework for retrospective case detection combining EMR and CCR data. Our classifier achieved good AUC, sensitivity, and specificity without expert-labeled examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albee Y Ling
- Biomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - George W Sledge
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Nigam H Shah
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, CA
| | - Suzanne R Tamang
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ma Q, Chung H, Shambhu S, Roe M, Cziraky M, Jones WS, Haynes K. Administrative claims data to support pragmatic clinical trial outcome ascertainment on cardiovascular health. Clin Trials 2019; 16:419-430. [PMID: 31081367 DOI: 10.1177/1740774519846853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Health plan administrative claims data present a cost-effective complement to traditional trial-specific ascertainment of clinical events typically conducted through patient report or a single health system electronic health record. We aim to demonstrate the value of health plan claims data in improving the capture of endpoints in longitudinal pragmatic clinical trials. METHODS This retrospective cohort study paralleled the design of the ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) trial designed to compare the effectiveness of two doses of aspirin. We applied the ADAPTABLE identification query in claims data from Anthem, an American health insurance company, and identified health plan members who met the ADAPTABLE trial criteria. Among the ADAPTABLE eligible members, we selected overlapping members with PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks in the 2 years prior to the index date (1 April 2014). PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks consist of network partners (or healthcare systems) that store their electronic health record data in the same format to support multi-institutional research. ADAPTABLE outcome events-cardiovascular hospitalizations including admissions for myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiac procedures; hospitalizations for major bleeding; and in-hospital deaths-were evaluated for a 2-year follow-up period. Events were classified as within or outside PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks using facility identifiers affiliated with each hospital stay. Patient characteristics were examined with descriptive statistics, and incidence rates were reported for available Clinical Data Research Networks and claims data. RESULTS Among 884,311 ADAPTABLE eligible health plan members, 11,101 patients overlapped with PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks. Average age was 70 years, 71% were male, and average follow-up was 20.7 months. Patients had 1521 cardiovascular hospitalizations (571 (37.5%) occurred outside PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks), 710 for major bleeding (296 (41.7%) outside PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks), and 196 in-hospital deaths (67 (34.2%) outside PCORnet Clinical Data Research Networks). Incidence rates (events per1000 patient-months) differed between available network partners and claims data: cardiovascular hospitalizations, 4.1 (95% confidence interval: 3.9, 4.4) versus 6.6 (95% confidence interval: 6.3, 7.0), major bleeding, 1.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.6, 2.0) versus 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.9, 3.3), and in-hospital death, 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.47, 0.67) versus 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.98), respectively. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the value of supplementing longitudinal site-based clinical studies with administrative claims data. Our results suggest that claims data together with network partner electronic health record data constitute an effective vehicle to capture patient outcomes since >30% of patients have non-fatal and fatal events outside of enrolling sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinli Ma
- 1 HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | | | - Matthew Roe
- 2 Duke Heart Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - W Schuyler Jones
- 2 Duke Heart Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Illustrating Informed Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records Data: How Patient Interactions with a Health System Can Impact Inference. EGEMS 2017; 5:22. [PMID: 29930963 PMCID: PMC5994954 DOI: 10.5334/egems.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Electronic health record (EHR) data are becoming a primary resource for clinical research. Compared to traditional research data, such as those from clinical trials and epidemiologic cohorts, EHR data have a number of appealing characteristics. However, because they do not have mechanisms set in place to ensure that the appropriate data are collected, they also pose a number of analytic challenges. In this paper, we illustrate that how a patient interacts with a health system influences which data are recorded in the EHR. These interactions are typically informative, potentially resulting in bias. We term the overall set of induced biases informed presence. To illustrate this, we use examples from EHR based analyses. Specifically, we show that: 1) Where a patient receives services within a health facility can induce selection bias; 2) Which health system a patient chooses for an encounter can result in information bias; and 3) Referral encounters can create an admixture bias. While often times addressing these biases can be straightforward, it is important to understand how they are induced in any EHR based analysis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinaire J, Azé J, Bringay S, Landais P. Patient healthcare trajectory. An essential monitoring tool: a systematic review. Health Inf Sci Syst 2017; 5:1. [PMID: 28413630 PMCID: PMC5390363 DOI: 10.1007/s13755-017-0020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient healthcare trajectory is a recent emergent topic in the literature, encompassing broad concepts. However, the rationale for studying patients' trajectories, and how this trajectory concept is defined remains a public health challenge. Our research was focused on patients' trajectories based on disease management and care, while also considering medico-economic aspects of the associated management. We illustrated this concept with an example: a myocardial infarction (MI) occurring in a patient's hospital trajectory of care. The patient follow-up was traced via the prospective payment system. We applied a semi-automatic text mining process to conduct a comprehensive review of patient healthcare trajectory studies. This review investigated how the concept of trajectory is defined, studied and what it achieves. METHODS We performed a PubMed search to identify reports that had been published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2015. Fourteen search questions were formulated to guide our review. A semi-automatic text mining process based on a semantic approach was performed to conduct a comprehensive review of patient healthcare trajectory studies. Text mining techniques were used to explore the corpus in a semantic perspective in order to answer non-a priori questions. Complementary review methods on a selected subset were used to answer a priori questions. RESULTS Among the 33,514 publications initially selected for analysis, only 70 relevant articles were semi-automatically extracted and thoroughly analysed. Oncology is particularly prevalent due to its already well-established processes of care. For the trajectory thema, 80% of articles were distributed in 11 clusters. These clusters contain distinct semantic information, for example health outcomes (29%), care process (26%) and administrative and financial aspects (16%). CONCLUSION This literature review highlights the recent interest in the trajectory concept. The approach is also gradually being used to monitor trajectories of care for chronic diseases such as diabetes, organ failure or coronary artery and MI trajectory of care, to improve care and reduce costs. Patient trajectory is undoubtedly an essential approach to be further explored in order to improve healthcare monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Pinaire
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Place R Debré, 30 029 Nîmes, France
- UPRES EA 2415, Clinical Research University Institute, 641 av du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34 093 Montpellier, France
- LIRMM, UMR 5506, Montpellier University, 860 rue de Saint Priest – Bât 5, 34 095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Jérôme Azé
- LIRMM, UMR 5506, Montpellier University, 860 rue de Saint Priest – Bât 5, 34 095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Sandra Bringay
- LIRMM, UMR 5506, Montpellier University, 860 rue de Saint Priest – Bât 5, 34 095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
- AMIS, Paul Valéry University, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul Landais
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Place R Debré, 30 029 Nîmes, France
- UPRES EA 2415, Clinical Research University Institute, 641 av du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34 093 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Low YS, Daugherty AC, Schroeder EA, Chen W, Seto T, Weber S, Lim M, Hastie T, Mathur M, Desai M, Farrington C, Radin AA, Sirota M, Kenkare P, Thompson CA, Yu PP, Gomez SL, Sledge GW, Kurian AW, Shah NH. Synergistic drug combinations from electronic health records and gene expression. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24:565-576. [PMID: 27940607 PMCID: PMC6080645 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Using electronic health records (EHRs) and biomolecular data, we sought to discover drug pairs with synergistic repurposing potential. EHRs provide real-world treatment and outcome patterns, while complementary biomolecular data, including disease-specific gene expression and drug-protein interactions, provide mechanistic understanding. Method We applied Group Lasso INTERaction NETwork (glinternet), an overlap group lasso penalty on a logistic regression model, with pairwise interactions to identify variables and interacting drug pairs associated with reduced 5-year mortality using EHRs of 9945 breast cancer patients. We identified differentially expressed genes from 14 case-control human breast cancer gene expression datasets and integrated them with drug-protein networks. Drugs in the network were scored according to their association with breast cancer individually or in pairs. Lastly, we determined whether synergistic drug pairs found in the EHRs were enriched among synergistic drug pairs from gene-expression data using a method similar to gene set enrichment analysis. Results From EHRs, we discovered 3 drug-class pairs associated with lower mortality: anti-inflammatories and hormone antagonists, anti-inflammatories and lipid modifiers, and lipid modifiers and obstructive airway drugs. The first 2 pairs were also enriched among pairs discovered using gene expression data and are supported by molecular interactions in drug-protein networks and preclinical and epidemiologic evidence. Conclusions This is a proof-of-concept study demonstrating that a combination of complementary data sources, such as EHRs and gene expression, can corroborate discoveries and provide mechanistic insight into drug synergism for repurposing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen S Low
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - William Chen
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tina Seto
- Clinical Informatics, Stanford University
| | | | - Michael Lim
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University
| | - Trevor Hastie
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University.,Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University
| | - Maya Mathur
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University
| | | | | | | | | | - Pragati Kenkare
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Peter P Yu
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University.,Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA, USA
| | - George W Sledge
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University
| | - Nigam H Shah
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shang N, Weng C, Hripcsak G. A conceptual framework for evaluating data suitability for observational studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 25:248-258. [PMID: 29024976 PMCID: PMC7378879 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To contribute a conceptual framework for evaluating data suitability to satisfy the research needs of observational studies. Materials and Methods Suitability considerations were derived from a systematic literature review on researchers’ common data needs in observational studies and a scoping review on frequent clinical database design considerations, and were harmonized to construct a suitability conceptual framework using a bottom-up approach. The relationships among the suitability categories are explored from the perspective of 4 facets of data: intrinsic, contextual, representational, and accessible. A web-based national survey of domain experts was conducted to validate the framework. Results Data suitability for observational studies hinges on the following key categories: Explicitness of Policy and Data Governance, Relevance, Availability of Descriptive Metadata and Provenance Documentation, Usability, and Quality. We describe 16 measures and 33 sub-measures. The survey uncovered the relevance of all categories, with a 5-point Likert importance score of 3.9 ± 1.0 for Explicitness of Policy and Data Governance, 4.1 ± 1.0 for Relevance, 3.9 ± 0.9 for Availability of Descriptive Metadata and Provenance Documentation, 4.2 ± 1.0 for Usability, and 4.0 ± 0.9 for Quality. Conclusions The suitability framework evaluates a clinical data source’s fitness for research use. Its construction reflects both researchers’ points of view and data custodians’ design features. The feedback from domain experts rated Usability, Relevance, and Quality categories as the most important considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Shang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - George Hripcsak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionS (ACCESS) study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2017; 7:136-140. [PMID: 29473059 PMCID: PMC5819346 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality in the United States. Cancer screening and prevention services have contributed to improved overall cancer survival rates in the past 40 years. Vulnerable populations (i.e., uninsured, low-income, and racial/ethnic minorities) are disproportionately affected by cancer, receive significantly fewer cancer prevention services, poorer healthcare, and subsequently lower survival rates than insured, white, non-Hispanic populations. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aims to provide health insurance to all low-income citizens and legal residents, including an expansion of Medicaid eligibility for those earning ≤138% of federal poverty level. As of 2012, Medicaid was expanded in 32 states and the District of Columbia, while 18 states did not expand, creating a ‘natural experiment’ to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer prevention and care. Methods We will use electronic health record data from up to 990 community health centers available up to 24-months before and at least one year after Medicaid expansion. Primary outcomes include health insurance and coverage status, and type of insurance. Additional outcomes include healthcare delivery, number and types of encounters, and receipt of cancer prevention and screening for all patients and preventive care and screening services for cancer survivors. Discussion Cancer morbidity and mortality is greatly reduced through screening and prevention, but uninsured patients are much less likely than insured patients to receive these services as recommended. This natural policy experiment will provide valuable information about cancer-related healthcare services as the US tackles the distribution of healthcare resources and future health reform. Trial Registration Clinicaltrails.gov identifier NCT02936609.
Collapse
|
17
|
Afghahi A, Mathur M, Thompson CA, Mitani A, Rigdon J, Desai M, Yu PP, de Bruin MA, Seto T, Olson C, Kenkare P, Gomez SL, Das AK, Luft HS, Sledge GW, Sing AP, Kurian AW. Use of Gene Expression Profiling and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Study of Linked Electronic Medical Records, Cancer Registry Data, and Genomic Data Across Two Health Care Systems. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e697-709. [PMID: 27221993 PMCID: PMC4957259 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.009803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) identifies patients with breast cancer who derive little benefit from chemotherapy; it may reduce unwarranted variability in the use of chemotherapy. We tested whether the use of RS seems to guide chemotherapy receipt across different cancer care settings. METHODS We developed a retrospective cohort of patients with breast cancer by using electronic medical record data from Stanford University (hereafter University) and Palo Alto Medical Foundation (hereafter Community) linked with demographic and staging data from the California Cancer Registry and RS results from the testing laboratory (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of RS and chemotherapy use. RESULTS In all, 10,125 patients with breast cancer were diagnosed in the University or Community systems from 2005 to 2011; 2,418 (23.9%) met RS guidelines criteria, of whom 15.6% received RS. RS was less often used for patients with involved lymph nodes, higher tumor grade, and age < 40 or ≥ 65 years. Among RS recipients, chemotherapy receipt was associated with a higher score (intermediate v low: odds ratio, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.94 to 6.91). A total of 293 patients (10.6%) received care in both health care systems (hereafter dual use); although receipt of RS was associated with dual use (v University: odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.55), there was no difference in use of chemotherapy after RS by health care setting. CONCLUSION Although there was greater use of RS for patients who sought care in more than one health care setting, use of chemotherapy followed RS guidance in University and Community health care systems. These results suggest that precision medicine may help optimize cancer treatment across health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anosheh Afghahi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Maya Mathur
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Caroline A Thompson
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Aya Mitani
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Joseph Rigdon
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Manisha Desai
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Peter P Yu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Monique A de Bruin
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Tina Seto
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Cliff Olson
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Pragati Kenkare
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Amar K Das
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Harold S Luft
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - George W Sledge
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Amy P Sing
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto; San Diego State University, San Diego; Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|