The hidden costs of the intercollegiate membership of the Royal College of surgeons examinations: Can trainees afford it?

BACKGROUND

The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is a mandatory requirement for higher specialty surgical training in the UK. However, there is a significant economic impact on trainees which raises the question of whether the costs of this exam hinder surgical career progression. This study explores the burden of these exams on trainees.

METHODS

A 37-point questionnaire was distributed to all trainees who were preparing for or have sat MRCS examinations. Univariate analyses included the cost of the preparatory resources, extra hours worked to pay for these and the examinations, and the number of annual leave (AL) days taken to prepare. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to identify possible correlation between monetary expenditure and success rate.

RESULTS

On average, trainees (n ​= ​145) spent £332.54, worked 31.2 ​h in addition to their rostered hours, and used 5.8 AL days to prepare for MRCS Part A. For MRCS Part B/ENT, trainees spent on average £682.92, worked 41.7 extra hours, and used 5 AL days. Overall, the average trainee spent 5-9% of their salary and one-fifth of their AL allowance to prepare for the exams. There was a positive correlation between number of attempts and monetary expenditure on Part A preparation (r(109)=0.536, p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable financial and social toll of the MRCS examination on trainees. Reducing this is crucial to tackle workforce challenges that include trainee retention and burnout. Further studies exploring study habits can help reform study budget policies to ease this pressure on trainees.

Motivators and deterrents for early career female doctors applying to surgical training programmes in the UK National Health Service: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES

To perform a mixed-methods study identifying motivators and deterrents to female doctors interested in core surgical training (CST). To provide tangible implementations based on the findings.

DESIGN

This study used quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (semistructured interviews (SSIs)) analyses. Participants completed online questionnaires on Qualtrics and SSIs were conducted remotely on Microsoft Teams. Questions were derived from previous studies and a novel term, the gender impact rating (GIR), was coined to assess the impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application.

SETTING

Participants were working in the UK National Health Service and data collected from December 2020 to January 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 100 female surgical trainees in the UK ranging from Foundation Year 2 to Core Training Year 2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants ranked factors by their influence on their CST application. Of the 100 trainees, 21 were randomly selected for an SSI to explore their questionnaire responses. Statistical analyses were performed using MATLAB and SPSS, alongside a thematic analysis of the interviews.

RESULTS

A total of 44 out of 100 questionnaire respondents ranked early exposure to surgery as the most influential motivator, while 43% selected work-life balance as the greatest deterrent and 33% suggested mentoring schemes to encourage women to apply to CST. The median GIR was 3 out of 5, indicating a moderate perceived impact of gender on opportunities available during CST application. Qualitative analysis found four overarching themes: institutional factors (including mentorship schemes), organisational culture (including active engagement), social factors and personal factors.

CONCLUSION

Thematic analysis suggested that seniors involving women in theatre and a supportive work environment would encourage entry of more female surgeons. Therefore, the proposed implementations are the active engagement of women in theatre and destigmatising less than full-time training. Further research into ethnicity and personality on motivations to enter surgery is advised.

Surgical training in the UK: is cost a barrier to entry?

BACKGROUND

There is good quality evidence linking socioeconomic background and the likelihood of a surgical career. Additionally, training in surgery is more expensive than in other specialties. Our aim was to assess the awareness and perceptions of trainees and medical students of the relative costs of surgical training and to determine whether perceptions of cost deter potential surgical trainees.

METHODS

Medical students, foundation doctors and core trainees in England were surveyed over a 2-week period. χ² tests of independence were used to assess statistically significant associations between measured variables MAIN FINDINGS: A total of 284 responses were received. More than half of respondents (54%) were not previously aware of the high costs of surgical training. More than a quarter of respondents (27%) did not take out a student loan. There was a significant association (p=0.003) between familial income and being less likely to consider a surgical career due to the costs. Respondents who reported receipt of a student loan were also significantly less likely to consider a surgical career due to the costs (p=0.033).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates an important relationship between perceived costs of surgical training and future career aspirations. This suggests that access to surgical training may still be difficult for many. This study also highlights a general lack of awareness of high surgical training costs. It is important that surgical training is accessible. Financial status should not be a significant disincentive and widening access to surgical training can only serve to enrich and advance the specialty.

Performance anxiety amongst trauma and orthopaedic surgical trainees

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess performance anxiety amongst orthopaedic trainees. Operating is equivalent in its skill level, both dexterous and mental, to that of elite sport. This study uses a slightly altered version of the validated Sports Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT), making it relevant to operating, rather than to sport, to evaluate peri-operative stress and anxiety in orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

The SCAT questionnaire was sent to trainees across 3 UK. deaneries via email. A score of <17 suggests low-levels of anxiety, 17-24 suggests medium-levels of anxiety and >24 suggest high-levels of anxiety. Data was anonymised except from training grade and sex.

RESULTS

109 of 273 (40%) responded to the survey, 71% of respondents were male (n = 77). The mean SCAT score amongst Core Surgical Trainees was 16.9 (n = 21, range 12-23), Specialist Trainees years 3-5 was 18.7 (n = 51, range 12-28), Specialist Trainees years 6-8 was 16.8 (n = 26, range 11-24) and consultants was 16 (n = 11, range 11-28). Across all groups, when sub-divided by sex, females had higher mean scores, this was statistically significant for Specialist Trainees years 3-5 (p = 0.029) and Specialist Trainees years 6-8 (p = 0.042) groups.

DISCUSSION

Surgical performance anxiety exists amongst orthopaedic surgeons, with females scoring higher than males. Five respondents scored "high-levels of anxiety" including 2 consultants level surgeons, suggesting experience does not entirely eliminate anxiety. Stress and anxiety are known to lead to surgical mistakes and "burnout" amongst surgeons which is highly topical at present. It is important to highlight this significant issue and it could be taken forward as a national survey to evaluate further.

A survey on the cost of oral surgery dental speciality training

Background Following graduation, training costs for an individual trainee to achieve completion of specialist surgical training has been estimated to be between £20,000 to £71,431, and is expected to rise. Furthermore, there are other non-monetary costs to consider, including poor work-life balance and the burden of training on home life.Methods A 22-question online survey using SurveyGizmo was developed and emailed to all current UK and Ireland oral surgery trainees from 2016-2019. The survey consisted of open free text, binomial and variable scale responses related to the cost of training.Results A total of 43 (96%) oral surgery trainees responded to the survey. Sixty-eight percent had enrolled on a postgraduate degree, or other higher qualification, during their training. Of these, only 4.5% were fully funded and nearly half received no funding at all. Trainees reported vast disparities in financial support across deaneries, with an overall average study budget of £687. Annual obligatory costs of up to £4,142 and a mean average spend of £9,240 on courses and £2,830 on conferences were reported. Childcare, relocating and textbooks were listed as additional costs incurred.Conclusion A standardised, transparent and more substantial financial support system is required for dental specialty trainees.

Listening to core surgical trainees who drop out

What can we learn from surgeons who leave?