Napsin A: Another milestone in the subclassification of ovarian carcinoma

Clinical and molecular features of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of all the gynecological tumors despite remarkable advances in our understanding of its molecular biology. The cornerstone treatment remains cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, the addition of targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors, as first-line maintenance has led to outstanding improvements, mainly in BRCA mutated and homologous recombination deficient tumors. However, a significant proportion of patients will experience recurrence, primarily due to platinum resistance, which ultimately result in fatality. Among these patients, primary platinum-resistant have a particularly dismal prognosis due to their low response to current available therapies, historical exclusion from clinical trials, and the absence of validated biomarkers. In this review, we discuss the concept of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer, the clinical and molecular characteristics of this resistance, and the current and new treatment options for these patients.

Trefoil factor family proteins as potential diagnostic markers for mucinous invasive ovarian carcinoma

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related death. Of the main OC histologic subtypes, invasive mucinous carcinomas (MC) account for only 3% of OC cases and are frequently associated with favorable prognosis. Nevertheless, MCs differ greatly from the other OC histotypes in clinical, pathological, and biological behavior. However, the origin and molecular pathogenesis of MC are not yet fully understood. Therefore, identification of novel diagnostic markers could potentially facilitate early diagnosis of OC, particularly the MC histotype, thereby leading to the development of histotype-specific treatment regimens and improved survival rates.

Methods

In the present study, Trefoil factor gene family members (TFF1, TFF2 and TFF3) were identified as MC histotype-specific biomarkers using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data for 95 stage I-II OCs. The diagnostic value of TFF1, TFF2 and TFF3 was then evaluated by immunohistochemistry on 206 stage I-II OCs stratified by histotype (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], clear cell carcinoma [CCC], and MC).

Results

We showed significantly elevated intracytoplasmic protein expression levels for TFF1, TFF2 and TFF3 in MC samples, thereby revealing an association between expression of Trefoil factor gene family members and the MC histotype. Taken together, these findings suggest that the TFF proteins may play a pivotal role in tumor initiation and progression for the MC histotype.

Conclusion

Taken together, these findings suggest that the TFF proteins may play a pivotal role in tumor initiation and progression for the MC histotype. Moreover, these novel histotype-specific diagnostic biomarkers may not only improve patient stratification of early-stage ovarian carcinomas but may also be candidates for the development of molecular targeted therapies.

Primary retroperitoneal nodal endometrioid carcinoma associated with Lynch syndrome: A case report

We report a rare case of primary nodal, poorly differentiated endometrioid carcinoma associated with Lynch syndrome. A 29-year-old female patient was referred by her general gynecologist for further imaging with suspected right-sided ovarian endometrioid cyst. Ultrasound examination by an expert gynecological sonographer at tertiary center revealed unremarkable findings in the abdomen and pelvis apart from three iliac lymph nodes showing signs of malignant infiltration in the right obturator fossa and two lesions in the 4b segment of the liver. During the same appointment ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy was performed to differentiate hematological malignancy from carcinomatous lymph node infiltration. Based on the histological findings of endometrioid carcinoma from lymph node biopsy, primary debulking surgery including hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Endometrioid carcinoma was confirmed only in the three lymph nodes suspected on the expert scan and primary nodal origin of endometroid carcinoma developed from ectopic Müllerian tissue was considered. As a part of the pathological examination immunohistochemistry analysis for mismatch repair protein (MMR) expression was done. The findings of deficient mismatch repair proteins (dMMR) led to additional genetic testing, which revealed deletion of the entire EPCAM gene up to exon 1-8 of the MSH2 gene. This was unexpected considering her insignificant family history of cancer. We discuss the diagnostic work-up for patients presenting with metastatic lymph node infiltration by cancer of unknown primary and possible reasons for malignant lymph node transformation associated with Lynch syndrome.

The Frequency and Prognostic Significance of the Histologic Type in Early-stage Ovarian Carcinoma: A Reclassification Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO)

The frequency and prognostic significance of the histologic type in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) is not as well established as in advanced stages. In addition, histologic typing based only on morphologic features may be difficult, especially in high-grade tumors. In this study, we have analyzed a prospective cohort of 502 early-stage OCs to investigate their frequency, immunohistochemical characteristics, and survival of the 5 main histologic types. Histotype was assigned according to not only the morphologic features but also according to the expression pattern of WT1, p53, Napsin A, and progesterone receptors. In addition, an extended panel including p16, β-catenin, HER2, Arid1A, HINF1B, CK7, CDX2, and CK20 was used to refine the diagnosis in difficult cases. In this series, the frequency of the 5 major histologic types was as follows: endometrioid carcinoma, 32.7%; clear cell carcinoma, 25.1%; high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), 24.7%; mucinous carcinoma, 10.2%; low-grade serous carcinoma, 4.6%; and others, 2.8%. The combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry allowed the reclassification of 23% of OCs. The lowest concordance was found between samples initially diagnosed as endometrioid, but finally classified as high-grade serous tumors (22% error rate). Endometrioid carcinoma was the most favorable histologic type, whereas HGSC and low-grade serous carcinoma had the worst prognosis. Clear cell carcinoma with abnormal p53 immunostaining pattern also had poor prognosis. Although histologic grade was not a prognostic factor among early-stage endometrioid OCs, distinction between grade 3 endometrioid OC and HGSC is recommended, taking into account differences in prognosis and molecular alterations that can guide different treatments.

Napsin-A, a Possible Diagnostic Marker for Differentiating Clear Cell Ovarian Carcinoma From Other High-grade Ovarian Carcinomas

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is divergent from other types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma in terms of clinicopathologic and molecular features. It should be separated from other high-grade carcinomas of the ovary for appropriate treatment. Napsin A is a reliable marker for adenocarcinoma of the lungs, but its role in ovarian epithelial carcinomas is vague. We investigated the expression of a panel of TTF-1, paired box 8, estrogen receptor, Wilms tumor 1, and Napsin A in 100 cases of high-grade ovarian carcinomas. All the examined cases were TTF-1 negative and paired box 8 positive. The 2 biomarkers estrogen receptor together with Wilms tumor 1 can separate CCC from endometriod carcinoma, yet this cannot be carried out in the case of serous and mucinous carcinomas of high grade. Napsin A can differentiate CCC with high sensitivity and specificity. It can be concluded that Napsin A is a sensitive and specific marker for CCC of the ovary. However, an entire marker panel may be useful for distinguishing ovarian CCC from other mimics.

The expression of IMP3 in 366 cases with ovarian carcinoma of high grade serous, endometrioid and clear cell subtypes

The clear cell (CCC), high grade serous (HGSC) and endometrioid (EC) ovarian carcinomas share overlapping histological features. The oncogene IMP3 is implicated in CCC with an elusive utility in differential diagnosis. We collected 366 cases with ovarian primary carcinomas to detect IMP3, Napsin-A and HNF-1β by immunochemistry. In 351 cases, the positive expression rate of IMP3 in CCC was significantly higher than that either in EC or HGSC (p < 0.01). The sensitivity of IMP3 in CCC was higher than Napsin-A but lower than HNF-1β (p < 0.01). The specificity of IMP3 in CCC was lower than Napsin-A but higher than HNF-1β (p < 0.01). The composite markers Napsin-A+/IMP3+ and the IMP3+/HNF-1β+/Napsin-A+ offered the highest odds ratio (p < 0.001), the highest specificity, the highest positive predictive value and the highest positive likelihood ratio. The ROC analysis showed that the combination of Napsin-A, HNF-1β and IMP3 offered the biggest AUC compared with either the singular marker performances or the other binary combinations (p < 0.001). In 15 cases of EC mixed with CCC, IMP3 showed a better discrimination value than the other two markers. Consequently, adding IMP3 to the diagnostic panel might provide some help with the pathological diagnosis of ovarian CCC.

[Recommendations for biomarker testing in epithelial ovarian cancer. A national consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

Advances in the understanding of the histological and molecular characteristics of ovarian cancer now allow 5subtypes to be identified, leading to a more refined therapeutic approach and improved clinical trials. Each of the subtypes has specific histological features and a particular biomarker expression, as well as mutations in different genes, some of which have prognostic and predictive value. CA125 and HE4 are examples of ovarian cancer biomarkers used in diagnosis and follow-up. Currently, somatic or germinal mutations on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most important biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer, having prognostic and predictive value. In this article, a group of experts from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology review the histological and molecular characteristics of the 5subtypes of ovarian cancer and describe the most useful biomarkers and mutations for diagnosis, screening and tailored treatment strategy.

Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Immunohistochemistry is widely used to support a pathology diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma despite the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published data. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry biomarkers in the tissue-based diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma histotypes compared with normal endocervix and benign glandular lesions. The systematic review and meta-analysis used a PICOT framework and QUADAS-2 to evaluate the quality of included studies. The literature search spanned 40 years and ended June 30, 2015. Abstracts of identified records were independently screened by 2 of the authors who then conducted a full-text review of selected articles. Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry expression in malignant glandular lesions of the cervix classified per WHO 2003 compared with 5 benign comparators (normal/benign endocervix, and benign endocervical, endometrioid, gastric, and mesonephric lesions) were calculated. Of 902 abstracts screened, 154 articles were selected for full review. Twenty-five articles with results for 36 biomarkers were included. The only biomarker with enough studies for a meta-analysis was p16 and the definition of positive p16 staining among them was variable. Nevertheless, any positive p16 expression was sensitive, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 with narrow confidence intervals (CIs), for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical and endometrioid lesions. Specificity for AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas was also high with narrow CIs compared with benign endocervical lesions. The specificity was high for AIS, 0.99 (0.24, 1.0), and mucinous adenocarcinoma, 0.95 (0.52, 1.0), compared with normal/benign endocervix but with wider CIs, and low with very wide CIs compared with benign endometrioid lesions: 0.31 (0.00, 0.99) and 0.34 (0.00, 0.99), respectively. Results from single studies showed that p16, p16/Ki67 dual stain, ProExC, CEA, ESA, HIK1083, Claudin 18, and ER loss in perilesional stromal cells were useful with high (≥0.75) sensitivity and specificity estimates in ≥1 malignant versus benign comparisons. None of the biomarkers had highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for AIS, mucinous adenocarcinomas, or minimal deviation adenocarcinoma/gastric adenocarcinoma compared with benign gastric or mesonephric lesions or for mesonephric carcinoma compared with normal/benign endocervix, benign endocervical, endometrial, or mesonephric lesions. Any expression of p16 supports a diagnosis of AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical lesions. The majority of studies did not separate mosaic/focal p16 staining from diffuse staining as a distinct pattern of p16 overexpression and this may have contributed to the poor performance of p16 in distinguishing AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas from benign endometrioid lesions. Single studies support further investigation of 8 additional biomarkers that have highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for ≥1 malignant glandular lesions compared with ≥1 of the 5 benign comparators.

Recommendations for biomarker testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: a National Consensus Statement by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Because of advances in the understanding of histological and molecular characteristics in ovarian cancer, it is now possible to recognize the existence of five subtypes, which in turn has allowed a more refined therapeutic approach and better design of clinical trials. Each of these five subtypes has specific histological features and a particular biomarker expression, as well as mutations in different genes, some of which have prognostic and predictive value. CA125 and HE4 are examples of ovarian cancer biomarkers used in the diagnosis and follow-up of these malignancies. Currently, somatic or germinal mutations on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most important biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer having prognostic and predictive value. This article will review the histological and molecular characteristics of the five subtypes of ovarian cancer, describing the most important biomarkers and mutations that can guide in diagnosis, screening and tailored treatment strategy.

Clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas: are their differences attributable to distinct cells of origin?

Endometrial epithelium is the presumed tissue of origin for both eutopic and endometriosis-derived clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas. We had previously hypothesized that the morphological, biological and clinical differences between these carcinomas are due to histotype-specific mutations. Although some mutations and genomic landscape features are more likely to be found in one of these histotypes, we were not able to identify a single class of mutations that was exclusively present in one histotype and not the other. This lack of genomic differences led us to an alternative hypothesis that these cancers could arise from distinct cells of origin within endometrial tissue, and that it is the cellular context that accounts for their differences. In a proteomic screen, we identified cystathionine γ-lyase (CTH) as a marker for clear cell carcinoma, as it is expressed at high levels in clear cell carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium. In the current study, we analysed normal Müllerian tissues, and found that CTH is expressed in ciliated cells of endometrium (both eutopic endometrium and endometriosis) and fallopian tubes. We then demonstrated that other ciliated cell markers are expressed in clear cell carcinomas, whereas endometrial secretory cell markers are expressed in endometrioid carcinomas. The same differential staining of secretory and ciliated cells was demonstrable in a three-dimensional organoid culture system, in which stem cells were stimulated to differentiate into an admixture of secretory and ciliated cells. These data suggest that endometrioid carcinomas are derived from cells of the secretory cell lineage, whereas clear cell carcinomas are derived from, or have similarities to, cells of the ciliated cell lineage. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.