Evaluation of Four Qualitative Third-Generation HIV Antibody Assays and the Fourth-Generation Abbott HIV Ag/Ab Combo Test

Evaluation of the vitros hiv combo 4th generation test for the identification of HIV infections

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous detection of HIV 1 and 2 antibodies and HIV-1 p-24 antigen in the 4th generation tests is particularly effective for the identification of early acute HIV infections while maintaining accurate detection of long-established infections.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the new 4th generation VITROS HIV Combo test from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics by comparing its results with those obtained using a 3rd generation HIV 1/2 antibody test (VITROS Anti HIV 1 + 2 from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics) and a 4th generation test (LIAISON XL HIV Ab/Ag, DiaSorin) currently used in the Microbiology Unit of Legnano Hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

One thousand and three samples of the normal daily routine (Group 1) were analyzed simultaneously with the three systems. The concordant and discordant sample results were further tested using Western blot and HIV-RNA assay (Roche). One hundred samples (Group 2) of known HIV positive subjects (63 of subtype B, 37 subtype non-B, and 51 with positive viraemia) and 50 samples (Group 3) with indeterminate Western blot were also examined using the three systems. From Group 3, 24 samples were collected from patients diagnosed with acute infection.

RESULTS

The overall agreement between the three systems was 99.4% (99.5% in group 1, 100% in group 2 and 96.6% in group 3) with a coefficient Fleiss Kappa of 0.9814. Notably, the VITROS HIV Combo test was positive in all known HIV positive samples of group 2 without any statistically significant difference in the values of the sample/cut off ratios between the B and non-B subtypes and between the positive and negative viraemia samples in established infections. The VITROS HIV Combo test was also positive in all samples of patients with acute infection in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The VITROS HIV Combo test has shown comparable performance to the other two assays in use of 3rd and 4th generation tests and is able to correctly identify both acute and established HIV infections independently of viraemia and HIV subtype.

Performance of a fourth-generation HIV screening assay and an alternative HIV diagnostic testing algorithm

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the performance of the GS fourth-generation antigen/antibody assay and compared Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) proposed alternative algorithm [repeatedly reactive fourth-generation immunoassay followed by an HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation immunoassay and, if needed, nucleic acid test (NAT)] with the current algorithm (repeatedly reactive third-generation immunoassay followed by HIV-1 western blot).

DESIGN

A convenience sample of the following four specimen sets was acquired: 10 014 from insurance applicants, 493 known western blot-positive, 20 known western blot-indeterminate specimens, and 230 specimens from 26 HIV-1 seroconverters.

METHODS

Specimens were tested with the GS third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays, the Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation immunoassay, NAT, and western blot. We applied the two algorithms using these results.

RESULTS

Among insurance specimens, 13 (0.13%) specimens were immunoassay repeatedly reactive: two were HIV-positive (repeatedly reactive by third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays, and western blot and Multispot positive); two third-generation repeatedly reactive and nine fourth-generation repeatedly reactive specimens were false-positive. Third-generation and fourth-generation specificities were 99.98% [95% confidence interval (CI) 99.93-100%] and 99.91% (95% CI 99.84-99.96%), respectively.All HIV-1 western blot-positive specimens were repeatedly reactive by third-generation and fourth-generation immunoassays. By Multispot, 491 (99.6%) were HIV-1-positive and two (0.4%) were HIV-2-positive.Only eight (40%) western blot-indeterminate specimens were fourth-generation repeatedly reactive: six were Multispot and NAT-negative and two were Multispot HIV-1-positive but NAT-negative.The alternative algorithm correctly classified as positive 102 seroconverter specimens with the third-generation immunoassay and 130 with the fourth-generation immunoassay compared with 56 using the western blot with either immunoassay.

CONCLUSION

The alternative testing algorithm improved early infection sensitivity and identified HIV-2 infections. Two potential false-positive algorithm results occurred with western blot-indeterminate specimens.