The significance of low-level plasma HIV viral load on COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 assays for patients with undetectable plasma viral load on COBAS Amplicor monitor version 1.5

HIV-1 variability and viral load technique could lead to false positive HIV-1 detection and to erroneous viral quantification in infected specimens

OBJECTIVES

Viral load (VL) testing is used for early HIV diagnosis in infants (EID) and for detecting early therapeutic failure events, but can be affected by HIV genetic variability. Dried blood samples (DBS) increase VL access and EID in remote settings and when low blood volume is available.

METHODS

This study compares VL values using Siemens VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 1.0 kPCR assay (kPCR) and Roche CAP/CTM Quantitative test v2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0) in 176 DBS carrying different HIV-1 variants collected from 69 Equatoguinean mothers and their infants with known HIV-1 status (71 infected, 105 uninfected).

RESULTS

CAP/CTM v2.0 provided false positive VLs in 11 (10.5%) cases. VL differences above 0.5 log10 were observed in 42/49 (87.5%) DBS, and were above 1 log10 in 18 cases. CAP/CTM v2.0 quantified all the 41 specimens with previously inferred HIV-1 variant by phylogenetic analysis (68.3% recombinants) whereas kPCR only identified 90.2% of them, and was unable to detect 14.3% of 21 CRF02_AG viruses. CAP/CTM v2.0 showed higher sensitivity than kPCR (95.8% vs. 70.1%), quantifying a higher rate of viruses in infected DBS from subjects under antiretroviral exposure at sampling time compared to kPCR (94.7% vs. 96.2%, p-value<0.001). kPCR showed maximum specificity (100%) whereas for CAP/CTM v2.0 was 89.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

VL assays should increase their sensitivity and specificity to avoid overestimated HIV-1 quantifications, which could be interpreted as virological failure events, or false negative diagnostic results due to genetic variability. We recommend using the same VL technique for each patient during antiretroviral therapy monitoring.

Comparison of the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test v1.0 with v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load quantification

Roche modified the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) test version 1.0 (CAP/CTM v1.0), resulting in the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CAP/CTM v2.0 and to compare this performance with that of the CAP/CTM v1.0. The study was conducted in a small local study group in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. A total of 86 plasma samples from HIV-1-seropositive patients were tested using the two assays. The correlation and concordance of results between the two assays were calculated. The CAP/CTM v2.0 generated higher values than did the CAP/CTM v1.0, and five samples (5.8%) yielded a difference of > 1 log10 copies/mL. In addition, our data show that CAP/CTM v1.0 and CAP/CTM v2.0 yielded relatively consistent values for 23 samples with low viral loads (< 200 copies/mL). Furthermore, when viral loads were in a medium range (2-5 log10 copies/mL), the results of the two assays were more compatible. This study shows a good correlation between CAP/CTM v1.0 and v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load measurement. Further attention must be paid to those cases in which measured viral loads present larger differences between the two assays.

HIV drug resistance detected during low-level viraemia is associated with subsequent virologic failure

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of emergent HIV drug resistance on samples with low-level viraemia (LLV <1000 copies/ml) remain unclear. We undertook the present analysis to evaluate the impact of emergent HIV drug resistance at LLV on the risk of subsequent virologic failure.

METHODS

One thousand, nine hundred and sixty-five patients had genotype results at LLV. Risk of virologic failure (≥1000 copies/ml) after LLV was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Resistance was assessed using the Stanford algorithm or virtual phenotypes. Patients were grouped into four susceptibility categories ('GSS' or 'vPSS') during LLV, corresponding to the number of 'active' drugs prescribed: <1; 1-1.5; 2-2.5; and ≥3.

RESULTS

A total of 1702 patients with follow-up on constant therapy were eligible for analysis. Participants excluded due to changing therapy or loss to follow-up before their next observation had mostly similar characteristics to included participants. There was a 'dose-dependent' increase in the hazard ratio for virologic failure with susceptibility categories at LLV. Compared with a GSS of at least 3, hazard ratios for virologic failure were 1.4 for GSS 2-2.5; 2.0 for GSS 1-1.5; and 3.0 for GSS less than 1 (P < 0.001). Numerous sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that emergent HIV drug resistance at LLV is strongly associated with subsequent virologic failure. Furthermore, we uncovered a 'dose-dependent' increase in the hazard ratio for virologic failure with decreasing GSS estimated at the time of LLV. On the basis of these findings, we propose that resistance genotyping be encouraged for HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy experiencing low-level viraemia.

Comparing HIV viral load assays and frequency of low level virological rebound in clinical practice

Research suggests that some low-level virological rebound results occurring for no obvious clinical cause, in patients stable on antiretroviral therapy (ART), may be a consequence of the viral load assay used. We compared the relative frequency of clinically unexplained low-level virological rebound results when using the Roche HIV Taqman version-1 (CTM v1), the Roche HIV Taqman version-2 (CTM v2) and the Abbott RealTime (Abbott RT) assays in clinical practice. In all, 247 patients from our centre who had their viral loads measured by the three different assays over a period of 3 consecutive years (each assay used for a period of 1 year each) were included in the study. Low-level virological rebound was defined as <1000 copies/ml. Over similar time periods, there was significant discrepancy between the three assays when considering the proportion of clinically unexplained low-level virological rebound results in patients stable on ART: the CTM v2 assay produced the highest percentage (93%), CTM v1 much lower (65%) and Abbott RT even less (35%). There is further research required regarding what, if any, implications this has for patients who experience clinically unexplained low-level virological rebound on the more sensitive assays.

Comparative performances of HIV-1 RNA load assays at low viral load levels: results of an international collaboration

Low-level viremia during antiretroviral therapy and its accurate measurement are increasingly relevant. Here, we present an international collaboration of 4,221 paired blood plasma viral load (pVL) results from four commercial assays, emphasizing the data with low pVL. The assays compared were the Abbott RealTime assay, the Roche Amplicor assay, and the Roche TaqMan version 1 and version 2 assays. The correlation between the assays was 0.90 to 0.97. However, at a low pVL, the correlation fell to 0.45 to 0.85. The observed interassay concordance was higher when detectability was defined as 200 copies/ml than when it was defined as 50 copies/ml. A pVL of ∼100 to 125 copies/ml by the TaqMan version 1 and version 2 assays corresponded best to a 50-copies/ml threshold with the Amplicor assay. Correlation and concordance between the viral load assays were lower at a low pVL. Clear guidelines are needed on the clinical significance of low-level viremia.

Markers associated with persisting low-level viraemia under antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection

OBJECTIVES

To identify host and viral characteristics associated with long-term persisting low-level viraemia (PLLV) under antiretroviral therapy (ART).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one ART-treated patients with long-term PLLV (20-250 copies/mL) and 102 control patients with systematically undetectable viral load (VL) were selected retrospectively from ART-treated patients followed at the Ghent HIV reference centre. Host and viral characteristics were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Higher plasma VL at therapy initiation (OR 3.52; 95% CI 1.86-6.65; P < 0.001), therapy re-initiation after an interruption (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.70-9.16; P = 0.001), male gender (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.40-13.00; P = 0.011), a protease inhibitor-based regimen (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.20-6.97; P = 0.017) and predicted CCR5 co-receptor tropism (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.05-6.11; P = 0.039) were independently associated with PLLV.

CONCLUSIONS

VL at ART initiation, therapy history, gender, ART regimen and co-receptor tropism were independently associated with PLLV. Gender, therapy history, co-receptor tropism and VL at ART initiation could be valuable predictive markers to identify patients at risk for PLLV.

Quantification of viral loads lower than 50 copies per milliliter by use of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, version 2.0, can predict the likelihood of subsequent virological rebound to >50 copies per milliliter

After 1 year of follow-up, patients on HAART with a baseline viral load (VL) of <20 copies/ml showed significantly lower odds of virological rebound to two consecutive VLs of >50 copies/ml than those with baseline VLs of 20 to 39 and 40 to 49 (P < 0.001). The time to virological rebound was also significantly shorter (P < 0.001) for the groups with baseline VLs of 20 to 39 and 40 to 49.

Evaluation of quantification of HIV-1 RNA viral load in plasma and dried blood spots by use of the semiautomated Cobas Amplicor assay and the fully automated Cobas Ampliprep/TaqMan assay, version 2.0, in Kisumu, Kenya

In Kenya, HIV-1 viral load monitoring is commonly performed with the Cobas Amplicor using plasma specimens. Interest is growing in transitioning to real-time PCR (RT-PCR), such as the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM), using dried blood spots (DBS). Before implementation, direct evaluation of the two assays using DBS field specimens is required. This study compares the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV, respectively), concordance, and agreement between HIV-1 viral load measurements using plasma and DBS specimens obtained from 512 HIV-1-infected pregnant females enrolled in the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study and tested with the Cobas Amplicor and CAP/CTM assays. The sensitivity and NPV of viral load detection in DBS specimens were higher with CAP/CTM (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 99.1 to 100.0%; NPV, 100%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 100.0%) than the Cobas Amplicor (sensitivity, 96.6%; 95% CI, 94.3 to 98.1%; NPV, 58.8%; 95% CI, 40.7 to 75.4%). The PPVs were comparable between both assays when using DBS. The specificity of viral load detection in DBS specimens was lower with CAP/CTM (77.8%; 95% CI, 40.0 to 97.2%) than that of the Cobas Amplicor (95.2%; 95% CI, 76.2 to 99.9%). Good concordance and agreement were observed when paired plasma and DBS specimens were tested with both assays. Lower specificity with the CAP/CTM is likely due to proviral HIV-1 DNA amplification and lower detection limits with RT-PCR. However, the CAP/CTM has better sensitivity and higher throughput than the Cobas Amplicor. These findings suggest that DBS may be a suitable alternative to plasma when using RT-PCR, which could increase access to viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Technical and regulatory shortcomings of the TaqMan version 1 HIV viral load assay

Background

The lower limit of detection of the original Roche Amplicor HIV plasma viral load (pVL) assay (50 copies/mL) has defined HIV treatment success. The Amplicor assay, however, has been replaced by the Roche TaqMan assay(s). Changes to the limits of detection and calibration have not been validated for clinical utility. Sudden increases in the number of patients with detectable pVL have been reported following the introduction of the TaqMan version 1 assay.

Methods

Between October 2009 and April 2010 all routine pVL samples from British Columbia, Canada, with 40–250 copies/mL by TaqMan were re-tested by Amplicor (N = 1198). Subsequent short-term virological and resistance outcomes were followed in patients with unchanged therapy (N = 279; median 3.2 months follow-up).

Results

TaqMan and Amplicor values correlated poorly at low pVL values. Low-level pVL by TaqMan was not associated with impending short-term virological failure; only 17% of patients with 40–250 copies/mL by TaqMan had detectable pVL by Amplicor at follow-up. During the follow-up period only 20% of patients had an increase in pVL by TaqMan (median [IQR]: 80 [36–283] copies/mL). In addition, in ∼2.4% of samples pVL was dramatically underestimated by TaqMan due to poor binding of the proprietary TaqMan primers.

Conclusions

The replacement of Amplicor with the TaqMan assay has altered the previously accepted definition of HIV treatment failure without any evidence to support the clinical relevance of the new definition. Given the systematic differences in measurement in the low pVL range the British Columbia HIV treatment guidelines now use a threshold of >250 copies/mL by TaqMan to define treatment failure.

Comparative frequencies of HIV low-level viremia between real-time viral load assays at clinically relevant thresholds

BACKGROUND

The introduction of new real-time PCR HIV-1 assays with higher sensitivity and broader dynamic range has resulted in detection of low-level viremia (LLV) (≥ 50 copies/mL) in some patients who previously had undetectable HIV-1 viral load (VL) (<50 copies/mL) with end-point PCR assays. It is therefore important to compare the performance of end-point and newer real-time PCR assays at medically relevant decision points.

OBJECTIVES

The study compared the results obtained with the end-point COBAS(®) AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, v1.5 to those obtained by three real-time PCR assays COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HIV-1 Test; the COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HIV-1 Test, v2.0; and the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 test.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 391 plasma specimens from HIV-1-infected patients from three US cities were tested with all four assays. The correlation and concordance of results between real-time and end-point PCR assays were calculated.

RESULTS

There was a consistent and similar proportion (11.8-14.0%) of HIV-1 VL ≥ 50 copies/mL with the three real-time PCR assays for specimens recording <50 copies/mL on the end-point PCR assay. The real-time PCR assays correlated with the end-point PCR assay within generally accepted limits, but consistently quantified higher than the end-point PCR assay between 50 and 200 copies/mL. Discrepancies in results were associated with patient CD4+ cell count and antiviral medication class.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical interpretation of VL results from real-time PCR assays should take into account their higher sensitivity at the lower quantitation range when assessing patients for disease progression and monitoring response to therapy in HIV-1-infected patients, in line with current treatment guidelines.

Clinical management of HIV drug resistance

Combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection has resulted in profound reductions in viremia and is associated with marked improvements in morbidity and mortality. Therapy is not curative, however, and prolonged therapy is complicated by drug toxicity and the emergence of drug resistance. Management of clinical drug resistance requires in depth evaluation, and includes extensive history, physical examination and laboratory studies. Appropriate use of resistance testing provides valuable information useful in constructing regimens for treatment-experienced individuals with viremia during therapy. This review outlines the emergence of drug resistance in vivo, and describes clinical evaluation and therapeutic options of the individual with rebound viremia during therapy.

Long-Term Resolution of Viral Breakthrough after Changing HIV Viral Load Assay

BACKGROUND

Viral load (VL) measurement assays differ in their sensitivity with polymerase chain reaction assays (PCR) being more sensitive than branched DNA (bDNA) assays. We evaluated virologic outcomes of patients and physicians' response to increased VL after a switch from bDNA to PCR assay.

METHOD

Retrospective, case-control study on 65 HIV+ patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Cases included patients with undetectable VL by bDNA that became detectable after the switch; controls were patients that remained undetectable. Records were reviewed up to 1 year after the switch.

RESULTS

A total of 58.5% patients had detectable VL after the switch. Repeat VL testing and resistance testing were ordered in 15.4% and 23.1% of these patients, respectively. By 1 year, VL was undetectable in 82.8% of cases and 92% of controls (P = .30), without change in HAART.

CONCLUSION

Transient viremia after changing VL assay reflects the different sensitivity of these assays with no impact on patients' outcomes compared to controls.

Lack of correlation between three commercial platforms for the evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral load at the clinically critical lower limit of quantification

BACKGROUND

Concordance in plasma HIV-1 viral load quantification at the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is crucial for current commercial assays.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of three commercial viral load assays and carry out a correlation study with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, the Roche Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 MONITOR test, and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay.

STUDY DESIGN

Assay agreement was analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots. Concordance near the clinically critical LLOQ was measured by Cohen's kappa statistics. Intra-assay precision was assessed, and assay reproducibility was measured at 50copies/mL across all three platforms.

RESULTS

While good overall correlation was observed between the assays (r≥0.93), quantitative differences exceeded 0.5log(10)copies/mL among paired results in 3.7 to 8.3% of specimens. The degree of concordance between the assays near the LLOQ was unsatisfactory, with Cohen's kappa ranging from 0.14 to 0.38. The intra-assay precision of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay ranged from 0.04 to 0.15 (SD log(10)) and 1.34% to 8.37% (CV). Reproducibility at 50copies/mL for RealTime HIV-1, TaqMan, and Amplicor was 10.05, 11.04 and 5.07 (% CV), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although good correlation was observed between the assays across their linear range, their concordance at the clinically critical LLOQ was poor. The accurate quantification of low-level viremia remains elusive, and the lack of correlation of these assays presents a challenge to the interpretation of such results and in the clinical management of HIV-infected patients.

Initial evaluation of the Roche COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 assay for determining viral load in HIV-infected individuals

BACKGROUND

HIV type-1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity poses a challenge for the development of diagnostic tests based on nucleic acid amplification, which can be overcome, at least in part, by targeting multiple genomic regions. The new Roche Diagnostics COBAS TaqMan (CTM) HIV-1 v2.0 assay uses multiplex real-time PCR detection of sequences in the long terminal repeat and gag regions within the HIV-1 genome.

METHODS

We conducted initial comparative testing of HIV-1 viral load values in plasma samples from HIV-1-infected individuals using the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 (Abbott RT HIV-1), and the Roche CTM v1.0 and CTM v2.0 real-time PCR amplification systems, with a particular focus on patients previously undetectable or underestimated with the CTM v1.0 assay.

RESULTS

The new Roche CTM v2.0 assay showed excellent agreement with the other two assays over a wide dynamic range (r=0.9685). The assay also allowed accurate determination of viral load levels in individuals infected with HIV-1 isolates that were found falsely negative or underestimated with the Roche CTM v1.0 assay because of mutations within the gag region.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability and accuracy of the CTM v2.0 assay is similar to the Abbott RT HIV-1 assay. The implementation of a multiplex real-time PCR approach in the CTM v2.0 is a significant improvement in viral load testing in comparison with the CTM v1.0 assay.

Correction of underquantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 load with the second version of the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan assay

Initial evaluations of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) test (CAP/CTM) demonstrated good performance but, afterwards, reports about underquantification were published. We investigated whether the problem was solved with a second version of this assay, the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0). The remaining plasma of 375 consecutive HIV-1 positive samples with a viral load of >or=4,000 copies/ml was collected in three laboratories. The samples were diluted and retested with our routine method Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 monitor test v1.5 in ultrasensitive mode (CAP/CA PHS), as well as with the CAP/CTM and CAP/CTM v2.0 tests. An absolute difference between the results of two methods of >or=0.71 log(10) copies/ml was defined as moderately discrepant, and an absolute difference of >or=0.93 log(10) copies/ml was defined as severely discrepant. In addition, criteria for considering the new methods equivalent to the routine method were formulated. (i) For CAP/CTM compared to CAP/CA PHS, 36 (9.5%) and 20 (5.3%) samples were, respectively, considered moderately and severely underquantified by CAP/CTM. The mean difference between CAP/CTM and CAP/CA PHS was -0.32 log(10) copies/ml. Eight of nineteen of the severely underquantified samples were from patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B strain. (ii) For CAP/CTM v2.0 compared to CAP/CA PHS, no sample was moderately or severely underquantified by CAP/CTM v2.0. A mean difference of 0.08 log(10) copies/ml was found with CAP/CTM v2.0 compared to CAP/CA PHS. The underquantification problem of the CAP/CTM kit was clearly demonstrated. The criteria for the equivalence of CAP/CTM v2.0 to the routine test CAP/CA PHS were fulfilled.

Performance evaluation of the new Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test version 2.0 for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA

Despite FDA approval and CE marking of commercial tests, manufacturer-independent testing of the technical aspects of newly developed tests is important. To evaluate the analytical performance and explore the clinical applicability of the new Roche COBAS AmpliPrep COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0), platform comparison was performed with the Roche CAP/CTM test, version 2.0, the COBAS Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, version 1.5 (CAP/CA v1.5), the COBAS AmpliPrep COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test (CAP/CTM v1.0), and the Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1 assay on panels and diagnostic samples. Specificity was tested for HIV-2 samples. Furthermore, samples from HIV-1-seropositive individuals with CAP/CA v1.5-measured viral loads below 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per ml (cp/ml) and replicates of HIV-1-seronegative plasma were tested in a checkerboard analysis. CAP/CTM v2.0 is HIV-1 specific, with broad genotype inclusivity and no serious underquantification of viral load relative to the other assays used. Low viral loads below the threshold of quantification for CAP/CA v1.5 are observed with CAP/CTM v2.0. A CAP/CTM v2.0-measured viral load of >50 copies/ml in these samples correlated with therapy failure. In conclusion, CAP/CTM v2.0 is an accurate and reliable test for HIV-1 viral load measurement relative to the other assays used with respect to specificity, sensitivity, and genotype inclusivity.

Viral load assay sensitivity and low level viremia in HAART treated HIV patients

BACKGROUND

The recent introduction of highly sensitive viral load assays resulted in a significant increase in number of treated HIV-infected patients with a detectable viral load. The significance of a viral load between 20 and 50 copies/mL remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of three viral load assays, with special attention for specificity and sensitivity at the lowest level of quantification.

STUDY DESIGN

Samples (n=181) were selected from 62 HIV-positive individuals that experience viral blips or episodes of low but detectable viremia under antiretroviral treatment, and from 216 HIV-negative individuals. Each sample was tested in at least two of three assays: the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (CAP/CA), the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 (CAP/CTM1) and the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2 (CAP/CTM2).

RESULTS

No false positive results were recorded. Kappa statistics revealed fair to moderate agreement between the results of the three assays, but important differences in sensitivity were observed, with the highest sensitivity reported for CAP/CTM2 followed by CAP/CTM1 and CAP/CA. The differences in sensitivity remained after equalization of the detection limit for all assays at 50 copies/mL. Analysis of samples collected over time showed that patients with single blips in CAP/CA present with recurrent blips in CAP/CTM1 and persistent detectable viremia in CAP/CTM2.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral load results between 20 and 50 copies/mL in either CAP/CTM1 or CAP/CTM2, indicate true viremia. The availability of highly sensitive assays force reconsideration of the terms 'undetectable' viral load and 'virological success' of antiretroviral treatment.

Results of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay for specimens yielding "target not detected" results by the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 Test

No significantly discordant results were observed between the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay and the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test (CTM) among 1,190 unique clinical plasma specimens obtained from laboratories located in 40 states representing all nine U.S. geographic regions and previously yielding "target not detected" results by CTM.

Comparative evaluation of the ExaVir Load version 3 reverse transcriptase assay for measurement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 plasma load

In resource-limited settings, the virological monitoring of antiretroviral therapy is limited by high cost and the lack of infrastructure. The Cavidi ExaVir Load assay employs a simple and inexpensive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay format to measure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase activity, which correlates with plasma RNA load. The version 3 assay has been described as having improved precision and sensitivity. There are limited data on its performance relative to those of current real-time assays. Our objective was to compare HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA load measurement in plasma by ExaVir Load version 3 (designated ExaVir), Abbott M2000sp/M2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay (designated RealTime), and Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 assay (designated TaqMan). Plasma from 119 patients (34 with subtype B infection, 85 with non-subtype B infection [A-H, CRF01, CRF02, CRF06, CRF12, CRF14, and complex]; 48 subjects were treatment experienced, 71 were naive) and serial dilutions of the second international standard (IS) were tested. Assay relationship and agreement were determined by linear regression, correlation analysis, and the Bland-Altman method. The ExaVir assay quantified 77/83 (92.8%) samples with viral loads of >2.3 log10 copies/ml by the molecular assays. Results were linearly associated and strongly correlated with RealTime and TaqMan measurements (R of 0.94 and 0.92, respectively) for both subtype B (R of 0.97 and 0.95, respectively) and non-subtype B (R of 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) samples. Mean differences were 0.28 and 0.18 log10 copies/ml in favor of the two molecular assays; 7/119 (5.9%) and 5/119 (4.2%) samples were outside the 95% level of agreement. ExaVir underquantified the IS by a mean of 0.2 (range, 0.0 to 0.5) log10 copies/ml. The ExaVir assay showed excellent concordance with real-time molecular assays, offering a suitable option for virological monitoring in settings with limited infrastructure.

Increased reporting of detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at the critical threshold of 50 copies per milliliter with the Taqman assay in comparison to the Amplicor assay

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application of the new COBAS Ampliprep Taqman HIV-1 assay in comparison with the COBAS HIV-1 Ampliprep AMPLICOR MONITOR ultrasensitive assay version 1.5, with a particular focus on the most clinically relevant region near the lower limit of quantification.

METHODS

Scatterplots and the Bland-Altman plot were used to inspect the degree of agreement between the 2 assays when tested on samples from the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS monitoring and evaluation system. Consistency of clinically applicable values at low HIV-1 RNA copy number was assessed from samples from individuals with previously undetectable Amplicor results.

RESULTS

Despite general agreement of these assays over a wide dynamic range, the Taqman assay resulted in a nearly 2-fold increase (from 3.6% to 6.9%) in the number of patients experiencing a plasma HIV-1 RNA level >50 copies per milliliter after being suppressed to levels <50 copies per milliliter consistently during the previous year (P < 0.01). In addition, rare discrepancies between the 2 assays were observed to be as high as 0.7 log10 copies per milliliter. The kappa statistic was 0.19, indicating only slight agreement at the critical threshold of 50 HIV RNA copies per milliliter, with 43% of undetectable samples in the Amplicor assay testing detectable in the Taqman assay (median 70 copies/mL; interquartile range 60-83 copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased frequency of detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at the threshold of 50 copies per milliliter with the new Taqman assay has important implications for highly active antiretroviral therapy monitoring. Until there is clinical evidence that patients with detectable HIV by the Taqman assay (but undetectable HIV with Amplicor) have differential outcomes, it is unclear whether the Taqman assay is appropriate for routine management of HIV-1 therapy, and caution is required in the interpretation of low-level viremia by the Taqman assay until a clinical validation of a new cutoff is performed.