Improving the clinical relevance of a mouse pregnancy model of antiretroviral toxicity; a pharmacokinetic dosing-optimization study of current HIV antiretroviral regimens

Animal models can be useful tools for the study of HIV antiretroviral (ARV) safety/toxicity in pregnancy and the mechanisms that underlie ARV-associated adverse events. The utility and translatability of animal model-based ARV safety/toxicity data is improved if ARVs are tested in clinically relevant concentrations. The objective of this work was to improve the clinical relevance of our mouse pregnancy model of ARV toxicity, by determining the doses of currently prescribed ARV regimens that would yield human therapeutic plasma concentrations. Pregnant mice were administered increasing doses of ARV combinations by oral gavage, followed by measurement of drug concentrations in the maternal plasma and amniotic fluid. Concentrations of ten different ARVs in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid samples of pregnant mice are presented, with dosing optimization to yield human pregnancy-relevant plasma drug concentrations. We have proposed optimal dosing for different regimen component drugs to achieve human therapeutic plasma levels, so that a clinically relevant standard dosing is established. A review of related ARV pharmacokinetic studies in (pregnant/non-pregnant) rodents and human pregnancy is also shown. We hope these data will inform and encourage the use of mouse pregnancy models in the study of ARV safety/toxicity.

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase polymorphism A98S improves the response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate+emtricitabine-containing HAART both in vivo and in vitro

The impact of baseline HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) polymorphisms on response to first-line modern HAART containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) was evaluated. The impact of each RT polymorphism on virological success (VS) was evaluated in 604 HIV-1 subtype B-infected patients starting TDF+FTC-containing HAART. TDF and FTC antiviral activity was also tested in PBMCs infected by mutagenised HIV. Structural analysis based on docking simulations was performed. A98S was the only mutation significantly correlated with an increased proportion of patients achieving VS at 24 weeks (94.0% vs. 84.3%; P=0.03). Multivariate regression and Cox model analyses confirmed this result. At concentrations close to the minimal concentration achieved in patient plasma, TDF and FTC exhibited higher potency in the presence of A98S-mutated virus compared with wild-type (IC_90,TDF, 8.6±1.1 vs. 19.3±3.5nM; and IC_90,FTC, 12.4±7.7 vs. 16.8±9.8nM, respectively). The efficacy of FTC, abrogated by M184V, was partially restored by A98S (IC_90,FTC, 5169±5931nM for A98S+M184V vs. 18477±12478nM for M184V alone). Docking analysis showed the higher potency of TDF and FTC in the presence of A98S-mutated virus was mainly due to higher binding affinity between drugs and mutated RT compared with wild-type. In the presence of FTC, A98S also partially restored the RT binding affinity impaired by M184V alone. A98S polymorphism improves virological response to TDF+FTC-containing HAART. This may help clinicians in the choice of the optimal NRTI backbone aimed at achieving maximal virological inhibition.

Changes in bone mineral density after 96 weeks of treatment with atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir DF/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: the CASTLE body composition substudy

: Antiretroviral therapy initiation is associated with declines in bone mineral density (BMD), which seem greatest with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)-containing regimens. Data comparing protease inhibitors are limited. This CASTLE substudy compared paired baseline with week 96 BMD in patients initiating tenofovir DF/emtricitabine plus atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 106) vs lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 70). In both groups, week 96 BMD declined significantly in arm, leg, trunk, and total body regions. Atazanavir/ritonavir was associated with smaller 96-week trunk and total body BMD declines compared with lopinavir/ritonavir [multivariate-adjusted least squares mean difference +2.00% (95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 3.45; P = 0.008) and +1.24% (95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 2.35; P = 0.029), respectively]. In addition, low baseline CD4 cell count (<50 cells per microliter) and increasing age were associated with larger declines in BMD.

Ritonavir boosting dose reduction from 100 to 50 mg does not change the atazanavir steady-state exposure in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and safety of 300 mg of atazanavir boosted with 100 or 50 mg of ritonavir, both once daily, at steady state.

METHODS

This was a single-blind, multiple-dose, crossover, sequence-randomized trial. Thirteen healthy HIV-1-negative men received witnessed once-daily doses of atazanavir (300 mg) and 100 or 50 mg of ritonavir for 10 days (15 day washout). Atazanavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were determined for 24 h on day 10. Log-transformed individual pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between treatments (analysis of variance); the difference between treatments on the log scale and 95% CIs were calculated. Fasting cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose and bilirubin plasma levels were measured at the beginning and end of each period and compared (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Gastrointestinal symptoms and other events were recorded.

RESULTS

Ritonavir C(max) and the AUC₀₋₂₄ were lower after the 50 mg booster dose than after 100 mg [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (95% CI), 0.40 (0.31-0.51) and 0.35 (0.29-0.42), respectively]. No differences were observed in atazanavir exposure with 50 or 100 mg of ritonavir [GMR C(max) (95% CI), 1.00 (0.79-1.28); GMR AUC₀₋₂₄ (95% CI), 0.98 (0.79-1.21)]. Atazanavir trough concentration was >0.15 mg/L in all volunteers. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased 0.40 mM (P = 0.01) and 0.37 mM (P = 0.003) from their corresponding baseline value during the 100 mg dosing period; there were no significant changes on 50 mg. Mild increases in bilirubin were detected on day 10 after both treatments without differences between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of higher exposure to ritonavir with 100 mg, atazanavir exposure was equivalent; the lipid profile was better under the lower booster dose (50 mg).

Abacavir, didanosine and tenofovir do not induce inflammatory, apoptotic or oxidative stress genes in coronary endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

The use of abacavir and didanosine in HAART has been associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients. The aim of this study was to address the development of endothelial dysfunction in cultivated coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) in response to abacavir, didanosine and tenofovir. We examined the impact of these drugs on the expression levels of the proinflammatory, oxidative stress and apoptosis regulating genes in HCAECs.

METHODS

We tested gene and protein expression changes in HCAECs in response to abacavir, didanosine and tenofovir using quantitative real-time reverse transciptase PCR, FACS and ELISA. The assessed genes/proteins included the proinflammatory molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1, RANTES and IL-6. In addition, we assessed the gene expression of the intracellular reactive oxygen producing NADPH oxidase subunit gp91(PHOX) and the apoptosis regulating molecules Bcl-2 and BAD.

RESULTS

Exposure of HCAECs to abacavir, didanosine and tenofovir resulted in no statistically significant changes in any of the tested genes/proteins at any time point or at any concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that abacavir, didanosine or tenofovir had direct in vitro effects on coronary endothelial cell gene transcription and protein expression of the selected mediators. If abacavir or didanosine increase cardiovascular risk, it is likely not through the direct endothelial activation pathways tested in these experiments. However, further studies are needed to completely exclude the toxicity of abacavir or didanosine on endothelial cells.

Acceptable plasma concentrations of raltegravir and etravirine when administered by gastrostomy tube in a patient with advanced multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus infection

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the absorption of four antiretroviral agents-raltegravir, etravirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir-is compromised when administered by gastrostomy tube.

DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic analysis.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENT

A 52-year-old African-American man coinfected with advanced multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and chronic hepatitis B, who was receiving treatment with raltegravir, etravirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir, and developed ulcerative esophagitis with perforation, requiring a gastrostomy tube.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Due to the patient's esophageal perforations, all nutrition and drug therapy had to be provided by gastrostomy tube. As his antiretroviral regimen of raltegravir, etravirine, and emtricitabine-tenofovir was not available in liquid or powder formulations, the oral tablets were crushed or dispersed and mixed with water, then administered by gastrostomy tube. To ensure that the absorption of the drugs was sufficient for antiretroviral response, plasma samples were collected at 2 hours and 12 hours after dosing, and drug concentrations were quantitated by using validated assays. The 2- and 12-hour postdose plasma concentrations were 1220 and 446 ng/ml for raltegravir, 212 and 274 ng/ml for etravirine, 1148 and 164 ng/ml for emtricitabine, and 320 and 94 ng/ml for tenofovir, respectively. The patient's plasma concentrations were then compared with those in published pharmacokinetic studies of oral regimens administered to HIV-infected persons and healthy volunteers. Overall, the plasma concentrations of the antiretrovirals administered by gastrostomy tube were similar to published values. No drug toxicities were observed in this patient.

CONCLUSION

These pharmacokinetic data suggest that absorption of raltegravir, etravirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir was not compromised when the drugs were administered by gastrostomy tube. These findings provide a basis for further investigation of the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerance, and antiretroviral response to raltegravir, etravirine, and emtricitabine-tenofovir when the oral route of administration is not possible.