Comparing the incidence of major cardiovascular events and severe microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative evaluation of clinical outcomes of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in type-2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors provide additional benefits besides glycemic control.

AIM

This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated data retrieved from medical records of patients who were under follow-up with the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and were started on dapagliflozin or empagliflozin treatment between January 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020. Demographic features, comorbidities, clinical features, duration of diabetes, baseline, and follow-up laboratory test results were recorded. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

This study comprised 342 patients who are on the treatment with dapagliflozin (n = 228) or empagliflozin (n = 114). The glycosylated hemoglobin a1c (HBA1C) level was significantly decreased in both the dapagliflozin (8.18-7.59, p < 0.001) and empagliflozin (8.35-7.58, p < 0.001) groups. The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was also decreased in both groups. A decrease in urine ACR was observed independent of using a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocker both in the whole group and in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The time to addition of a new anti-diabetic agent to the treatment was shorter in the dapagliflozin group (14.4 months vs 17.7 months, p = 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dapagliflozin and empagliflozin are the drugs to choose for renoprotection in diabetics independent of the use of a RAAS blocker. Even the time to addition of a new anti-diabetic agent is longer in the empagliflozin group, head-to-head comparative trials are needed to asess the potential differences in this regard.

Association Between Parental Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Major Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Adult Offspring: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous research suggests an intergenerational influence of diabetes on bone health. We examined the association between parental diabetes and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk in offspring.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used de-identified administrative health data from Manitoba, Canada, which capture population-level records of hospitalizations, physician visits and drug dispensations. The cohort included individuals 40⁺ years with at least 1 parent identified in the data between 1997 and 2015. The exposure was parental diagnosis of diabetes since 1970; the outcome was offspring incident MOF diagnosis of the hip, forearm, spine or humerus. Both measures were identified from hospital and physician visit records using validated case definitions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models tested the association of parental diabetes and offspring MOF risk.

RESULTS

The cohort included 279,085 offspring; 48.5% were females and 86.8% were ≤44 years of age. Both parents were identified for 89.4% of the cohort; 36.7% had a parental diabetes diagnosis. During a median follow up of 12.0 (interquartile range, 6.0 to 18.0) years, 8,762 offspring had a MOF diagnosis. After adjusting for fracture risk factors, parental diabetes diagnosis was not associated with MOF risk, whether diagnosed in fathers (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08), mothers (aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.07) or both parents (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.11). The results remained consistent in a stratified analysis by offspring sex, secondary analysis based on MOF site and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate parental diabetes is not associated with offspring MOF risk.