Atorvastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemias

Cholesterol-Related lncRNAs as Response Predictors of Atorvastatin Treatment in Chilean Hypercholesterolemic Patients: A Pilot Study

Statins are currently the treatment of choice for hypercholesterolemia. However, wide interindividual variability has been observed in the response to treatment. Recent studies have reported the role of lncRNAs in the metabolism of lipids; nevertheless, there are few studies to date that show their role in the response to treatment with statins. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the levels of expression of three lncRNAs (RP1-13D10.2; MANTIS; lncHR1) associated with genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis in leukocyte cells of hypercholesterolemic patients after treatment with atorvastatin and compare them with levels in subjects with normal cholesterol levels. A secondary aim was to assess the levels of expression in monocytic THP-1 cells differentiated to macrophages. The study included 20 subjects with normal cholesterol (NC) levels and 20 individuals with hypercholesterolemia (HC). The HC patients were treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day/4 weeks). THP-1 cells were differentiated to macrophages with PMA and treated with different doses of atorvastatin for 24 h. Expression of lncRNAs was determined by RT-qPCR. The lncRNAs RP1-13D10.2 (p < 0.0001), MANTIS (p = 0.0013) and lncHR1 (p < 0.0001) presented increased expression in HC subjects compared with NC subjects. Furthermore, atorvastatin had a negative regulatory effect on the expression of lncHR1 (p < 0.0001) in HC subjects after treatment. In vitro, all the lncRNAs showed significant differences in expression after atorvastatin treatment. Our findings show that the lncRNAs tested present differential expression in HC patients and play a role in the variability reported in the response to atorvastatin treatment. Further research is needed to clarify the biological impact of these lncRNAs on cholesterol homeostasis and treatment with statins.

Identification of target and pathway of aspirin combined with Lipitor treatment in prostate cancer through integrated bioinformatics analysis

PURPOSE

Our previous studies have confirmed that aspirin combined with Lipitor inhibited the development of prostate cancer (PCa), but the mechanisms need to be comprehensively expounded. The study aims to screen out the hub genes of combination therapy and to explore their association with the pathogenesis and prognosis of PCa.

METHODS

Gene expressions were quantified by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Altered biological function, pathways of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), protein-protein interaction network, the filtering of hub genes, gene co-expression and the pathogenesis and prognosis were revealed by bioinformatics analysis. The correlation between hub gene expression and patient survival was validated by Kaplan-Meier. The effects of silent DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion 1 (siDSCC1) combined with Lipitor and aspirin on DSCC1 expression, viability, invasion and migration of PCa cells were detected by qRT-PCR, Wound healing and transwell assays.

RESULTS

157 overlapped DEGs involved in FoxO, PI3K-Akt and p53 signaling pathways were identified. Ten hub genes (NEIL3, CDC7, DSCC1, CDC25C, PRIM1, MCM10, FBXO5, DTL, SERPINE1, EXO1) were verified to be correlated with the pathology and prognosis of PCa. DSCC1 silencing not only inhibited the viability, migration and invasion of PCa cells, but also strengthened the suppressing effects of Lipitor and aspirin alone or in combination on PCa cells.

CONCLUSION

The enrichment pathways and targets of Lipitor combined with aspirin in PCa are discovered, and DSCC1 silencing can potentiate the effect of Lipitor combined with aspirin in the treatment of PCa.

Identification of an individual with a SYGNAP1 pathogenic mutation in India

Exome sequencing is a prominent tool to identify novel and deleterious mutations which could be non-sense, frameshift, and canonical splice-site mutations in a specific gene. De novo mutations in SYNGAP1, which codes for synaptic RAS-GTPase activating the protein, causes Intellectual disability (ID) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). SYNGAP1 related ASD/ID is one of the rare diseases that are detrimental to the healthy neuronal developmental and disrupts the global development of a child. We report the first SYNGAP1 heterozygous patient from Indian cohort. We report a case of a child of 2-year old with global developmental delay, microcephaly subtle dysmorphism, absence seizures, disrupted sleep, delay in learning a language, and eating problems. Upon further validation, the child has a few traits of ASD. Here, based on focused exome sequencing, we report a de novo heterozygous mutation in SYNGAP1 exon 11 with c. 1861 C > T (p.arg621ter). Currently, the child is on Atorvastatin, a RAS inhibitor, already available in the market for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and has shown considerable improvement in global behaviour and cognitive development. The long-term follow up of the child's development would contribute to the already existing knowledge of the developmental trajectory in individuals with SYNGAP1 heterozygous mutation. In this report, we discuss the finding of a novel mutation in one of the genes, SYNGAP1, implicated in ASD/ID. Besides, we discuss the current treatment prescribed to the patient and the progress of global developmental of the child.

Effect of dietary n-3 fatty acids supplementation on fatty acid metabolism in atorvastatin-administered SHR.Cg-Leprcp/NDmcr rats, a metabolic syndrome model

The effects of cholesterol-lowering statins, which substantially benefit future cardiovascular events, on fatty acid metabolism have remained largely obscured. In this study, we investigated the effects of atorvastatin on fatty acid metabolism together with the effects of TAK-085 containing highly purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) ethyl ester on atorvastatin-induced n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid lowering in SHR.Cg-Lepr^cp/NDmcr (SHRcp) rats, as a metabolic syndrome model. Supplementation with 10mg/kg body weight/day of atorvastatin for 17 weeks significantly decreased plasma total cholesterol and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Atorvastatin alone caused a subtle change in fatty acid composition particularly of EPA and DHA in the plasma, liver or erythrocyte membranes. However, the TAK-085 consistently increased both the levels of EPA and DHA in the plasma, liver and erythrocyte membranes. After confirming the reduction of plasma total cholesterol, 300mg/kg body weight/day of TAK-085 was continuously administered for another 6 weeks. Supplementation with TAK-085 did not decrease plasma total cholesterol but significantly increased the EPA and DHA levels in both the plasma and liver compared with rats administered atorvastatin only. Supplementation with atorvastatin alone significantly decreased sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c, Δ5- and Δ6-desaturases, elongase-5, and stearoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) desaturase-2 levels and increased 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase mRNA expression in the liver compared with control rats. TAK-085 supplementation significantly increased stearoyl-CoA desaturase-2 mRNA expression. These results suggest that long-term supplementation with atorvastatin decreases the EPA and DHA levels by inhibiting the desaturation and elongation of n-3 fatty acid metabolism, while TAK-085 supplementation effectively replenishes this effect in SHRcp rat liver.

Atorvastatin treatment modulates the interaction between leptin and adiponectin, and the clinical parameters in patients with type II diabetes

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of atorvastatin treatment on levels of leptin, adiponectin and insulin resistance, and their correlation with clinical parameters, in patients with type II diabetes. Patients with diabetes (n=394) were divided into two groups, comprising 161 patients who received 20 mg/day atorvastatin (statin group), and 233 patients who did not receive statins (statin-free group). The results showed that atorvastatin treatment of patients with diabetes was not associated with changes in leptin, adiponectin, the leptin/adiponectin (L/A) ratio or homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). However, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (Tchol) were positively correlated with leptin and L/A ratio in the statin group only (P<0.05). By contrast, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) showed a significant positive correlation with adiponectin in the statin and statin-free groups (P<0.05). Additionally, a positive correlation was found between HOMA-IR and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and TG, in both groups, whereas Tchol was positively correlated with HOMA-IR in the statin group only (P<0.05). When multivariate analysis was performed with HOMA-IR as the dependent variable, and with adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, HbA1c was found to be a significant predictor of HOMA-IR or insulin resistance. In conclusion, atorvastatin treatment may have several effects on the interaction between leptin and adiponectin, and on clinical parameters in patients with type II diabetes.

Newer therapeutic strategies to alter high-density lipoprotein level and function

Measurements of low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been identified as a risk factor for premature coronary artery disease, however, to date, current pharmacologic approaches for raising HDL have provided little benefit, if at all, in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. It has been shown that HDL can modify many aspects of plaque pathogenesis. Its most established role is in reverse cholesterol transportation, but HDL can also affect oxidation, inflammation, cellular adhesion, and vasodilatation. Considering these potential benefits of HDL, newer treatments have been developed to modify HDL activity, which include the use of oral cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, apolipoprotein (apo)A-I infusions, apoA-I mimetics, drugs to increase apoA-I synthesis, and agonists of the liver X receptor. These new therapies are reviewed in this article.

Proteomic analysis of endothelial lipid rafts reveals a novel role of statins in antioxidation

As inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, statins have pleiotropic vascular-protective effects, such as anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects. We investigated the short-term beneficial effects of statins on modulating the translocation of lipid-raft-related proteins in endothelial cells (ECs). Human umbilical vein ECs were treated with atorvastatin for 30 min or 2 h; lipid-raft proteins were isolated and examined by quantitative proteome assay. Functional classification of identified proteins in lipid rafts revealed upregulated antioxidative proteins; downregulated proteins were associated with inflammation and cell adhesion. Among proteins verified by Western blot analysis, endoplasmic reticulum protein 46 (ERp46) showed increased level in lipid rafts with atorvastatin. Further, atorvastatin inhibited the activation of membrane-bound NADPH oxidase in both untreated and angiotensin II-treated ECs, as shown by reduced reactive oxygen species production. Co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence experiments revealed that atorvastatin increased the association of ERp46 and Nox2, an NADPH oxidase isoform, in lipid rafts, thereby inhibiting Nox2 assembly with its regulatory subunits, such as p47phox and p67phox. Our results reveal a novel antioxidative role of atorvastatin by promoting the membrane translocation of ERp46 and its binding with Nox2 to inhibit Nox2 activity in ECs, which may offer another insight into the pleiotropic functions of statins.

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol: leveraging practice-based biobank cohorts to characterize clinical and genetic predictors of treatment outcome

Over the past decade, large multicenter trials have unequivocally demonstrated that decreasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol can reduce both primary and secondary cardiovascular events in patients at risk. However, even in the context of maximal LDL lowering, there remains considerable residual cardiovascular risk. Some of this risk can be attributed to variability in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. As such, there is tremendous interest in defining determinants of HDL homeostasis. Risk prediction models are being constructed based upon (1) clinical contributors, (2) known molecular determinants and (3) the genetic architecture underlying HDL cholesterol levels. To date, however, no single resource has combined these factors within the context of a practice-based data set. Recently, a number of academic medical centers have begun constructing DNA biobanks linked to secure encrypted versions of their respective electronic medical record. As these biobanks combine resources, the clinical community is in a position to characterize lipid-related treatment outcome on an unprecedented scale.

Atorvastatin accelerates extracellular nucleotide degradation in human endothelial cells

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) exert pleiotropic effects in the cardiovascular system beyond its cholesterol-lowering action. We aimed to investigate how atorvastatin affects extracellular nucleotide degradation in human endothelial cells, as increased activity of this pathway would facilitate conversion of pro-inflammatory nucleotides into anti-inflammatory adenosine. Primary cultures of human endothelial cells were treated with 1 microM, 10 microM and 100 microM atorvastatin for 24 h. Enzyme assays were performed as well as intact cell studies, to evaluate capacity of cells to degrade ATP to adenosine. Atorvastatin significantly increased ATP breakdown and adenosine formation in the medium of intact cells in a dose-dependent manner. The activities of ATPase, ADPase and ecto-5'-nucleotidase (eN) in cell homogenates following Atorvastatin treatment were also increased while no change was observed in the lactate dehydrogenase activity. We suggest a new mechanism of protective effect of atorvastatin by activation of endothelial enzymes involved in extracellular nucleotide degradation in human endothelial cells.

Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges

Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Some SADRs may be predictable, based upon a drug's pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Many, however, appear to be idiosyncratic. Genetic factors may underlie susceptibility to SADRs and the identification of predisposing genotypes may improve patient management through the prospective selection of appropriate candidates. Here we discuss three specific SADRs with an emphasis on genetic risk factors. These SADRs, selected based on wide-sweeping clinical interest, are drug-induced liver injury, statin-induced myotoxicity and drug-induced long QT and torsades de pointes. Key challenges for the discovery of predictive risk alleles for these SADRs are also considered.

A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind 14-week extension study examining the long-term safety and efficacy profile of the ezetimibe/simvastatin combination tablet

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) tablet and SIMVA monotherapy. This was an extension study of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Protocol-compliant patients who completed the 12-week base study were eligible to enter a randomised, double-blind, 14-week extension study and were administered 1 of 8 daily treatments: EZE/SIMVA 10/10-, 10/20-, 10/40- or 10/80-mg, or SIMVA 10-, 20-, 40- or 80-mg. Patients receiving these treatments during the base study remained on the same treatment in the extension. Patients administered placebo or EZE 10-mg monotherapy during the base study were re-randomised to EZE/SIMVA 10/10 mg or SIMVA 80 mg. The primary analysis was mean per cent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to extension study end-point. Mean changes from baseline in LDL-C of -38.8% and -53.7% were observed for pooled SIMVA and pooled EZE/SIMVA respectively. The between treatment difference of -14.9% (95% confidence interval: -16.4, -13.3) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The incremental LDL-C lowering effect of EZE/SIMVA compared with the corresponding dose of SIMVA alone was consistent across the dose range (p < 0.001 for each between-group comparison). More patients receiving EZE/SIMVA than SIMVA achieved LDL-C concentrations < 100 mg/dl and < 70 mg/dl (p < 0.001 for both goals). EZE/SIMVA was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to SIMVA monotherapy. There were no significant between-group differences in the incidences of clinically significant elevations in liver transaminase or creatine kinase levels. In conclusion, EZE/SIMVA had a comparable safety and tolerability profile and was more efficacious than SIMVA monotherapy for up to 6 months.

Cytochrome P450 gene-based drug prescribing and factors impacting translation into routine clinical practice

Pharmacogenetics represents a rapidly advancing, competitive field of investigation. Due to the potential for clinically recognizable interactions between a set of old polymorphic genes and a relatively new environmental insult (drugs), many human geneticists believe that variability in the drug-metabolizing enzyme systems will soon translate into clinical practice across entire populations. Despite this, the field has not yet received widespread clinical acceptance. This article will review the common cytochrome P450 gene polymorphisms and discuss the factors that may facilitate (or attenuate) their translation into clinical practice.

Current status of lipid management of hypertensive patients

Hypertensives, in addition to requiring strict blood pressure control, need lipid management to prevent cardiovascular disease. To assess the current status of lipid management of hypertensives, we reviewed the profiles of 830 hypertensives. The quality of lipid management was assessed using the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperlipidemia in Japanese Adults announced in 1997. Hyperlipidemia was diagnosed in 45.2% of hypertensives and in 56.6% of patients in category C (a group of patients with coronary heart disease). Lipid-lowering drugs were used in 63.5% of all hypercholesterolemic patients and in 78.1% of category C patients. Statins were administered to more than 80% of hypercholesterolemic patients. Only 39.4% of hypertensives achieved the target total cholesterol level and only a very small percentage (17.1%) of patients in category C reached the target levels. The elderly hypertensives were the single largest group (42.2% of all hypertensives) in this study population, and the target cholesterol level for this group has been elevated from 200 mg/dl to 220 mg/dl in the JAS Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases announced in 2002 (new guidelines). In conclusion, in hypertensives requiring lipid management, the lipid-lowering approach appeared insufficient, as the target achievement rate was relatively low despite a high treatment rate. This was most marked for patients in category C.

Effects of Atorvastatin on LDL sub-fractions and peroxidation in type 1 diabetic patients: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of both developing and dying from cardiovascular disease, and, currently, more aggressive lipid-lowering targets are being recommended for these patients. Statins are widely and successfully used to correct dyslipidemia and prevent acute coronary episodes, but their effects on lipoprotein composition and peroxidation have not been fully investigated. We aimed to address this issue in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

T1DM patients with atherogenic index (total/HDL-cholesterol > 4) were randomised double-blindly to group A (n = 12) that received Atorvastatin 40 mg/day and group P (n = 12) that received placebo. They were monitored for blood biochemistry, LDL sub-fractions and lipid peroxidation at inclusion, after 6 and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In group A, the 40% decrease in serum total and LDL cholesterol and 20% decrease in triglycerides was accompanied by a decrease in serum alpha-tocopherol from 46.4 +/- 16.3 (mean +/- SD) at inclusion to 32.2 +/- 11.8 and 32.6 +/- 14.0 micromol/L after 6 and 12 weeks respectively (p < 0.001 compared to group P by repeated-measures ANOVA). Relative to LDL + VLDL cholesterol, alpha-tocopherol increased by 40% (p < 0.001). Copper-induced LDL + VLDL peroxidation increased from 4891 +/- 1325 at inclusion to 6821 +/- 2291 and 7040 +/- 1712 nmol TBARS/mg LDL + VLDL cholesterol produced in 3 h (p = 0.004). LDL sub-fractions shifted towards the less dense regions (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that Atorvastatin lowers the antioxidant capacity of LDL and VLDL in T1DM. The mechanisms underlying these changes merit further investigation and should be taken into account when planning long-term primary prevention of CHD in diabetes.

Hemostatic effects of atorvastatin versus simvastatin

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with primary hypercholesterolemia without coronary heart disease were treated with atorvastatin 10-20 mg/d or simvastatin 10-20 mg/d. At baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, lipid levels such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), and hemostatic parameters such as platelet counts, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) prothrombin time (PT), and fibrinogen levels were measured.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, the doses of the statins were increased to 20 mg/d in 10 of 35 (28.5%) patients treated with atorvastatin and 18 of 26 (69.2%) patients treated with simvastatin when the target level of LDL-C (130 mg/dL) was not reached. Mean doses were atorvastatin 12.8 mg/d and simvastatin 16.9 mg/d. After 24 weeks, 5 patients (14.3%) in the atorvastatin group and 4 patients (15.3%) in the simvastatin group had not reached the goal. In patients with diabetes, target level (LDL-C <100 mg/dL) was not reached in 35.7% of patients in the atorvastatin group and 44.4% of patients in the simvastatin group. Both simvastatin and atorvastatin were effective in lowering TC and LDL-C levels (p < 0.001). Atorvastatin lowered TGs significantly (p < 0.01). Neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin significantly reduced VLDL-C levels. HDL-C levels increased with atorvastatin, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Platelet counts decreased with both statins nonsignificantly. Moreover, fibrinogen levels decreased with simvastatin and atorvastatin, but these reductions were significant only for simvastatin (p < 0.05). We detected prolongation of the PT with both drugs (p < 0.05); however, prolongation of the PTT was significant only with simvastatin (p < 0.001). Effectiveness of both statins on lipid and hemostatic parameters was dose related. Adverse effects were seen in 5 patients (14.2%) treated with atorvastatin and 3 patients (11.5%) treated with simvastatin. Elevations in serum transaminase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal and in creatine phosphokinase >5 times the upper limit of normal were not observed in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin on lipid parameters, although statistically insignificantly, while simvastatin produced more significant changes than atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters. The mean dose of simvastatin was greater than that of atorvastatin. Both statins had increased effects on lipid and hemostatic parameters when doses were increased. Atorvastatin and simvastatin were well tolerated. Different effects of statins on lipid levels and on coagulation parameters should be considered in patients with hypercholesterolemia and tendency to coagulation, especially in preventing thrombotic events. Further studies in larger trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Effect of atorvastatin on intracellular calcium uptake in coronary smooth muscle cells from diabetic pigs fed an atherogenic diet

Intracellular Ca(2+) store loading has been shown to alter proliferation and apoptosis of several cell types. In addition, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (i.e. atorvastatin) are effective in treating diabetic dyslipidemic patients. Thus, we hypothesized that chronic atorvastatin treatment would prevent increased Ca(2+) uptake into intracellular Ca(2+) stores in vascular smooth muscle cells from diabetic dyslipidemic pigs. Male Yucatan pigs were divided into four groups for 20 weeks-- (1) low fat fed (control); (2) hyperlipidemic (F); (3) alloxan-induced diabetic dyslipidemic (DF); and (4) diabetic dyslipidemic pigs treated with atorvastatin (DFA). The F, DF, and DFA groups were fed a high fat/cholesterol diet. Cells were isolated from the coronary artery and the myoplasmic Ca(2+) (Ca(m)) response measured using single cell fura-2 imaging. The Ca(m) response to caffeine (5 mM to release Ca(2+) from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, SR) and ionomycin (10 microM; to release the total Ca(2+) store) was determined in either the presence of low Na (19Na; inhibits Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchange), thapsigargin (TSG; inhibits the SR Ca(2+) pump), and a 19Na+TSG solution. Low Na induced the uptake of Ca(2+) into both SR and non-SR Ca(2+) stores in the DF group, but not the DFA group. Furthermore, after depletion of the SR Ca(2+) store with TSG, 19Na evoked Ca(2+) uptake into non-SR Ca(2+) stores in all three groups except in the DFA group. In summary, this study demonstrates that atorvastatin prevents the enhanced uptake of Ca(2+) by SR and non-SR Ca(2+) stores in diabetic dyslipidemic pigs.

Statin-fibrate combination therapy

BACKGROUND

Precautionary warnings for severe myopathy and rhabdomyolysis from the coadministration of statins and fibrates have been well publicized. However, a recent cerivastatin labeling change made the combined use with fibric acid derivatives a contraindication. Practical recommendations for clinicians who care for patients with refractory mixed hyperlipidemia are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for clinicians in the treatment of refractory mixed hyperlipidemia.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive MEDLINE (1966-July 2000) and bibliographic search was performed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Thirty-six published clinical trials and 29 case reports involving combination therapy with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors and fibric acid derivatives regarding the occurrence of rhabdomyolysis or myopathy were reviewed. The literature review demonstrated that combination therapy with a statin and fibrate increases the risk of muscle damage, with an incidence of 0.12%. Risk factors that predispose patients to myopathy caused by combination statin-fibrate therapy include increased age, female gender, renal or liver disease, diabetes, hypothyroidism, debilitated status, surgery, trauma, excessive alcohol intake, and heavy exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with a statin and fibrate offers significant therapeutic advantage for the treatment of severe or refractory mixed hyperlipidemia. Although such a combination does increase the risk of myopathy, with an incidence of approximately 0.12%, this small risk of myopathy rarely outweighs the established morbidity and mortality benefits of achieving lipid goals. Nevertheless, a higher incidence of myopathy has been reported with statin monotherapy. When monotherapy with a statin fails to control mixed hyperlipidemia, combination therapy may be considered. Niacin may be added before a fibrate is considered, as it appears to have less risk of myopathy. Statin-fibrate combination therapy must be undertaken cautiously and only after careful risk-benefit analysis. Patient counseling on the risks and warning signs of myopathy is extremely important.

Safety profiles for the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: treatment and trust

Hypercholesterolaemia is a chronic condition that often requires life-long treatment, making the safety of lipid-lowering drugs a critical issue. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors ('statins') are commonly used as the pharmacotherapeutic treatment of choice for patients with hypercholesterolaemia. These agents have consistently demonstrated a positive safety and tolerability profile, and are recommended by the US National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines and by the European Joint Task Force for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease to be used after, or in addition to, a first-line approach with diet. Several large-scale clinical trials have shown HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to be efficacious and well tolerated, and to be associated with a low rate of treatment withdrawal due to adverse events. These studies included mortality and morbidity end-points, and comprised both primary- and secondary-prevention trials. Hepatic, renal and muscular systems are rarely affected during HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy and the few drug interactions that can occur with concomitantly administered drugs are well documented. There is no conclusive evidence linking HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to the development of cancer in humans. In long term studies with various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, there was no increase in cancer rates compared with placebo. Thus, it can be concluded that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are well tolerated, effective treatments for hypercholesterolaemia.

Randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in 1,030 hypercholesterolemic patients. The Cerivastatin Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy and safety of cerivastatin and pravastatin in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study, hypercholesterolemic patients were randomized to treatment with cerivastatin, 0.3 mg (n=250) or 0.4 mg (n=258), or pravastatin, 20 mg (n=266) or 40 mg (n=256), for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, was significantly more effective than pravastatin, 20 mg, in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline (-29.6% vs -26.8%; P=.008). Cerivastatin, 0.4 mg, was significantly more effective than pravastatin, 40 mg, in reducing LDL cholesterol (-34.2% vs -30.3%; P<.001). A larger proportion of cerivastatin-treated patients had greater than 40% reductions in LDL cholesterol than those receiving pravastatin (11.1% vs 6.0%). The percentage of patients who achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target was 71.3% with cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, compared with 67.5% with pravastatin, 20 mg, and 74.0% with cerivastatin, 0.4 mg, compared with 71.1% with pravastatin, 40 mg (no significant difference). Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg, reduced total cholesterol to a greater extent than did pravastatin, 20 mg (P<.03). Both agents reduced triglycerides and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to a similar degree (no significant differences). Cerivastatin and pravastatin were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerivastatin, 0.3 mg and 0.4 mg, showed greater efficacy than pravastatin, 20 mg and 40 mg, respectively, in lowering LDL cholesterol. Cerivastatin is safe and effective for patients with hypercholesterolemia who require aggressive LDL cholesterol lowering to achieve NCEP-recommended targets.

Short-term effect of atorvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic renal-transplant patients unresponsive to other statins

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerosis associated with hyperlipidaemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Atorvastatin is a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that has shown a favourable profile of lipid reduction when compared with other statins. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic renal transplant patients who had previously been on statins with little or no effect.

METHODS

Atorvastatin, 10 mg/day, was administered to 10 renal transplant recipients with persistent hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol >240 mg/dl) for a period of 3 months. All of them had already been on statins for at least 3 months.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin exerted a satisfactory lipid-lowering effect in seven of 10 patients. On average, serum total cholesterol (311+/-36.2 vs 253+/-48.8 mg/dl; P:<0.05) and serum LDL cholesterol (184+/-30.9 vs 136+/-22.9 mg/dl; P:<0.05) significantly decreased after atorvastatin therapy, whereas serum HDL cholesterol (86+/-14.6 vs 84+/-22.1 mg/dl) remained unchanged. In five subjects with a baseline serum triglyceride level above 150 mg/dl, a marked reduction in triglycerides was also observed (261+/-80.3 vs 193+/-53.3 mg/dl; P:<0.05). Lp(a) did not significantly change (13+/-16.3 vs 15+/-23.9 mg/dl, P:=NS). Serum creatinine, transaminases, creatinine phosphokinase (55+/-21.3 vs 56+/-29.4 IU/l) and fasting cyclosporin A levels were unaffected. The drug was generally well tolerated and neither myositis nor rhabdomyolysis was reported.

CONCLUSION

Short-term therapy with the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, appears to be effective in lowering atherogenic lipids in renal transplant patients who had had little or no response to other statins.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Lipid-Lowering Effects of Atorvastatin

Objective:

To evaluate the lipid-lowering effects, particularly changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, associated with atorvastatin use in a typical outpatient family medicine practice.

Design:

Retrospective case series.

Setting:

A community-based family medicine residency program.

Patients:

One hundred twenty-three patients with hyperlipidemia.

Interventions:

Treatment with atorvastatin to meet National Cholesterol Education Program (Adult Treatment Program) II goals.

Main Outcome Measures:

Fasting lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides.

Results:

Atorvastatin lowered total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. HDL cholesterol was essentially unchanged from baseline to follow-up. In a subset of patients (∼50%), HDL cholesterol decreased by 13.1%. In the remainder of patients, HDL cholesterol increased by 10.7%. The decrease of HDL cholesterol was as much as 24 mg/dL.

Conclusions:

Atorvastatin is an effective agent for lowering total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In a subset of patients, atorvastatin appeared to lower HDL cholesterol. Close monitoring of HDL cholesterol concentrations while patients are receiving atorvastatin is important.

Efficacy and safety of cerivastatin 0.8 mg in patients with hypercholesterolaemia: the pivotal placebo-controlled clinical trial. Cerivastatin Study Group

This pivotal, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin 0.8 mg. Patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia were randomized, after 10 weeks' dietary stabilization on an American Heart Association (AHA) Step I diet, to treatment with cerivastatin 0.8 mg (n = 776), cerivastatin 0.4 mg (n = 195) or placebo (n = 199) once daily for 8 weeks. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg reduced mean low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by 41.8% compared with cerivastatin 0.4 mg (-35.6%, P < 0.0001) or placebo. In 90% of patients receiving cerivastatin 0.8 mg LDL-C was reduced by 23.9 -58.4% (6th - 95th percentile). Overall attainment of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal was achieved by 84% of patients receiving cerivastatin 0.8 mg and by 59% of those with coronary heart disease (CHD). In the sub-population meeting the NCEP criteria for pharmacological therapy for LDL-C reduction, 74.6% of patients, including the 59% with CHD, reached the goal with cerivastatin 0.8 mg. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg also reduced mean total cholesterol by 29.9%, apolipoprotein B by 33.2% and median triglycerides by 22.9% (all P < 0.0001). Mean high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A1 were elevated 8.7% (P < 0.0001) and 4.5% (P < 0.0001), respectively, by cerivastatin 0.8 mg. Reductions of triglyceride and elevation in HDL-C were dependent upon triglyceride baseline levels; in patients having baseline triglyceride levels 250 - 400 mg/dl, cerivastatin 0.8 mg reduced median triglycerides by 29.5% and elevated HDL-C by 13.2%. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg was well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events included headache, pharyngitis and rhinitis (4 - 6%). Symptomatic creatine kinase elevations > 10 times upper limit of normal occurred in 0%, 1% and 0.9% of patients receiving placebo, cerivastatin 0.4 mg or cerivastatin 0.8 mg, respectively. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg is an effective and safe treatment for patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia who need aggressive LDL-C lowering in order to achieve NCEP-recommended levels.

Safety of drugs commonly used to treat hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes (the metabolic syndrome): part 1

The benefits of blood pressure lowering, lipid lowering, and glycemic control on morbidity and mortality have been established in major long-term clinical trials. The most extensive information is available for diuretics or beta-blockers in hypertension, hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in dyslipidemia, and insulin or sulfonylureas in diabetes. Other drug classes provide similar improvements in blood pressure, lipid profile, and glycemic control, and thereby might be expected to provide comparable long-term benefits. As a result, national guidelines advocate treating patients aggressively in order to achieve control of blood pressure low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and blood glucose. The risks associated with drug treatment are generally class-specific. Among antidiabetic agents, sulfonylureas and insulin are associated with risk for severe hypoglycemia, metformin with risk for lactic acidosis, and troglitazone with risk for idiosyncratic hepatocellular injury. Similarly, widely used antihypertensive and lipid-lowering agents are associated with risk for serious complications, such as angioedema with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, possible increased risk for myocardial infarction and cancer with calcium antagonists, and myositis and liver dysfunction with statins. Physicians must take an aggressive approach to patient management in order to achieve a level of disease control that optimally reduces risk for morbidity and mortality. Serious adverse events may occur rarely with most drug classes; these events can be minimized by appropriately monitoring or selecting patients for treatment.

Primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease through applied genetics

Primordial prevention might be considered prevention of the development of disease at its earliest stages or early intervention on risk factors to eliminate increased risk in the first place. In this review we consider how knowledge of genetic causes of early cardiovascular disease can lead to directed screening and better treatment of high risk individuals. While gene therapy would be the most "primordial" approach to prevention of some diseases such as familial hypercholesterolemia, its practical application remains on the horizon. Nevertheless, there is much we can do now to prevent early deaths in genetically high risk patients. Here we consider epidemiology as the parent discipline for applied genetics and as integral to primordial prevention. With new knowledge of special susceptibility and new understanding of the interaction of genetics and exposures, prevention of individual high-risk in the first place is realizable. We summarize here the known and candidate genes influencing atherosclerosis, hypertension, and thrombosis; their diagnosis; and some useful preventive approaches. MEDPED, an international scheme for detection of risk in medical pedigrees, is described, along with the cost and social implications of its application as a preventive strategy.