Pharmacogenetic screening for susceptibility to fetal malformations in women

Drug target-gene signatures that predict teratogenicity are enriched for developmentally related genes

Drugs prescribed during pregnancy affect two populations simultaneously: fetuses and their mothers. Drug-induced fetal injury (teratogenicity) has a significant impact on current and future public health. Teratogenic risk designation of many drugs relies on associating rare fetal events with rare environmental exposures. Therefore we aim to develop preclinical predictive models of clinical teratogenicity. We collated public databases for drug-target-gene relationships for 619 drugs spanning the 5 pregnancy risk classes. Genes targeted by high risk but not low risk drugs demonstrated 79% accuracy (p < 0.0001 vs. random) for predicting high vs. low fetal risk on cross validation. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that target genes of drugs known to be safe in pregnancy contained no developmentally related terms, while target genes of known teratogens contained 85 developmentally related terms. Drug target gene signatures that are enriched for known developmental genes may provide valuable preclinical predictive information regarding drug pregnancy risk.

Teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs: role of drug metabolism and pharmacogenomics

The approach to clinical decision-making pertaining to the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy has relied on previous accumulated experience and, since the 1990s, on data from pregnancy registries. The limitations of this process are that no information regarding the chemical attributes of the AED under consideration, nor the role of a number of enzyme systems that are known to interact with foreign compounds to modify their potential for harm, are included. The role of the hepatic mixed function oxidase system may be especially important in conferring teratogenic risk. However, systems such as epoxide hydrolase, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase and other toxin-scavenging systems may be important modifiers that lower the risk. Knowledge is also accumulating on the interactions of AEDs with molecular targets such as histone deacetylase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors that may play important roles in teratogenesis. While our knowledge of these factors are incomplete, progress can be achieved by beginning to include these concepts in our discussion on the topic and by promoting research that may improve our ability to individualize the analysis of risk for a specific patient with regards to specific AEDs.

Effects of drugs on the fetus

Most drugs are not labelled for use in pregnancy. Consequently, large numbers of women expose their fetus to potential risks, either because they do not know that they are pregnant or because they require treatment for gestational pathologies. The present review focuses on drug classes for which the risk:benefit ratio during pregnancy has been discussed recently based on human data. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have gained wide acceptance in the treatment of depression and data on their risk for neonatal adaptation after late exposure are reviewed. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptors antagonists interact with the renin-angiotensin system, although with different mechanisms, and might cause severe fetal tubular dysgenesis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antiviral drugs and recreational drugs are also presented.

Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

Genetic variability in drug response occurs as a result of molecular alterations at the level of drug-metabolising enzymes, drug targets/receptors, and drug transport proteins. In this paper, we discuss the possibility that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the future will involve not the mere measurement and interpretation of drug concentrations but will include both traditional TDM and pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM. In contrast to traditional TDM, which cannot be performed until after a drug is administered to the patient. pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM can be conducted even before treatment begins. Other advantages of genotyping over traditional TDM include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) it does not require the assumption of steady-state conditions (or patient compliance) for the interpretation of results; (ii) it can often be performed less invasively (with saliva, hair root or buccal swab samples); (iii) it can provide predictive value for multiple drugs [e.g. a number of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, CYP2C 19 or CYP2C9 substrates] rather than a single drug; (iv) it provides mechanistic, instead of merely descriptive, information; and (v) it is constant over an individual's lifetime (and not influenced by concurrent drug administration, alteration in hormonal levels or disease states). Pharmacogenetic information can be applied a priori for initial dose stratification and identification of cases where certain drugs are simply not effective. However, traditional TDM will still be required for all of the reasons that we use it now. In current clinical practice, pharmacogenetic testing is performed for only a few drugs (e.g. mercaptopurine, thioguanine, azathioprine, trastuzumab and tacrine) and in a limited number of teaching hospitals and specialist academic centres. We propose that other drugs (e.g. warfarin, phenytoin, codeine, oral hypoglycaemics, tricyclic antidepressants, aminoglycosides, digoxin, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, theophylline and clozapine) are potential candidates for pharmacogenetics-oriented TDM. However, prospective studies of phaymacogenetics-oriented TDM must be performed to determine its efficacy and cost effectiveness in optimising therapeutic effects while minimising toxicity. In the future, in addition to targeting a patient's drug concentrations within a therapeutic range, pharmacists are likely to be making dosage recommendations for individual drugs on the basis of the individual patient's genotype. As we enter the era of personalised drug therapy, we will be able to identify not only the best drug to be administered to a particular patient, but also the most effective and safest dosage from the outset of therapy.

Pharmacogenetic tactics and strategies: implications for paediatrics

Genetic diversity exerts profound effects on variation in human drug response in adults, but comparatively little research that specifically relates to genetically abnormal responses in infancy and childhood has been reported. Specific genetic changes in human enzymes, receptors and other proteins that are implicated in drug response and their associated phenotypic correlates provide needed data for construction of profiles individualised to predict susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. If therapy adheres to such guidelines, failure to respond to drug therapy and drug toxicity among genetically susceptible persons can be greatly minimised or averted.

Implications of the Human Genome Project for obstetrics and gynecology

The initial sequencing of the human genome should be regarded as a milestone in a road that stretches years into the future; the full ramifications of the Human Genome Project are still only being theorized. Researchers will benefit from the catalog of human genes in studies of the genetics of disease susceptibility and the cell biology of gene interactions. Clinicians will increasingly offer genetic or biochemical testing to identify those at highest risk for a number of diseases. Drug discovery will eventually follow newly possible studies of gene expression and protein function. However the Human Genome Project eventually shapes medicine, it is certain that physicians, particularly obstetricians and gynecologists, will need to be well versed in the scientific and ethical issues involved, inasmuch as we will likely be at the center of the most heated debates.