Argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hepato-renal failure and CVVHD

Approaches to Precision-based Anticoagulation management in the critically Ill

Anticoagulant therapy is commonly associated with a high incidence of avoidable adverse events, especially in the acute care setting. This has led to several initiatives by key national health care stakeholders, including specific attention to The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals, to improve anticoagulation management. The subject of special populations has long been identified as challenging by clinicians with the use of anticoagulants. This is driven in part by numerous variables that can contribute to hard outcomes such as bleeding, thrombosis, length of stay, hospital re-admission, morbidity, and mortality. Despite the notable effort to improve the use of anticoagulants with numerous clinical trials, guidelines, guidance statements, and other sources of published evidence, notable difficulties continue to challenge practitioners in managing this class of medications. This is especially the case with very diverse critically ill populations where countless variables exist, many of which were never explored in trials or have historically been frequently excluded. Trials evaluating anticoagulation therapy often can only account for small portions of variables that may affect thrombosis and hemostasis, and study methods often do not reflect the constantly changing dynamic conditions seen in unique critically ill patients. Clinicians providing care to the numerous critically ill populations are faced with conditions that lead to relatively small therapeutic windows, which makes designing safe optimal anticoagulation management plans difficult when dealing with complex patients and mechanical support devices. The approach to crafting a successful management plan for anticoagulant therapy must incorporate the numerous variables that are continuously assessed and revised during the patient's time in the intensive care unit. We explore considerations and approaches when developing, assessing, and implementing an individualized or precision-based management plan that involves the use of anticoagulants in the critically ill. The skills and thought process provided will assist clinicians in managing this unique, variable, and challenging population.

Argatroban versus Lepirudin in critically ill patients (ALicia): a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Critically ill patients often require renal replacement therapy accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia during heparin anticoagulation may be due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with need for alternative anticoagulation. Therefore, we compared argatroban and lepirudin in critically ill surgical patients.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval and written informed consent, critically ill surgical patients more than or equal to 18 years with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were randomly assigned to receive double-blind argatroban or lepirudin anticoagulation targeting an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) of 1.5 to 2 times baseline. In patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy we compared the life-time of hemodialysis filters. We evaluated in all patients the incidence of bleeding and thrombembolic events.

RESULTS

We identified 66 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 28 requiring renal replacement therapy. Mean filter lifetimes did not differ between groups (argatroban 32 ± 25 hours (n = 12) versus lepirudin 27 ± 21 hours (n = 16), mean difference 5 hours, 95% CI -13 to 23, P = 0.227). Among all 66 patients, relevant bleeding occurred in four argatroban- versus eleven lepirudin-patients (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 14.0, P = 0.040). In the argatroban-group, three thromboembolic events occurred compared to two in the lepirudin group (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.4, P = 0.639). The incidence of confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was 23% (n = 15) in our study population.

CONCLUSIONS

This first randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing two direct thrombin inhibitors showed comparable effectiveness for renal replacement therapy, but suggests fewer bleeds in surgical patients with argatroban anticoagulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov NCT00798525. Registered 25 November 2008.

Argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for anticoagulation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT; in several countries) and in patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; in the USA). HIT is a relatively common extreme prothrombotic condition. When HIT is reasonably suspected, an alternative anticoagulant should be promptly initiated. In historical controlled studies, argatroban reduced new thrombosis, mortality from thrombosis and the composite of death, amputation or thrombosis, without increasing bleeding. With intravenous infusion, advantages include short half-life, easy monitoring and elimination primarily by hepatobiliary (rather than renal) means. In patients undergoing PCI, argatroban with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition leads to high rates of procedural success with low bleeding risk. Herein we review argatroban therapy for HIT and for PCI.

Non-recovery of ACT in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II during mitral valve replacement using argatroban anticoagulation

Argatroban was used as the anticoagulant during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II undergoing mitral valve replacement. Dosage was reduced because of preoperative congestive liver disorder. Perioperative coagulability was poor, and, ultimately, failure of hemostasis led to a fatal outcome. Although argatroban use as an anticoagulant for HIT is reported, the optimal dose has not been established. During long-term CPB, increasing the total dosage may extend anticoagulant ability, leading to dose dependence. Because no antagonist for argatroban exists, failure of hemostasis might occur.

An Official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF Statement: Prevention and Management of Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Patient: an international consensus conference in intensive care medicine

OBJECTIVES

To address the issues of Prevention and Management of Acute Renal Failure in the ICU Patient, using the format of an International Consensus Conference.

METHODS AND QUESTIONS

Five main questions formulated by scientific advisors were addressed by experts during a 2-day symposium and a Jury summarized the available evidence: (1) Identification and definition of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI), this terminology being selected by the Jury; (2) Prevention of AKI during routine ICU Care; (3) Prevention in specific diseases, including liver failure, lung Injury, cardiac surgery, tumor lysis syndrome, rhabdomyolysis and elevated intraabdominal pressure; (4) Management of AKI, including nutrition, anticoagulation, and dialysate composition; (5) Impact of renal replacement therapy on mortality and recovery.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Jury recommended the use of newly described definitions. AKI significantly contributes to the morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients, and adequate volume repletion is of major importance for its prevention, though correction of fluid deficit will not always prevent renal failure. Fluid resuscitation with crystalloids is effective and safe, and hyperoncotic solutions are not recommended because of their renal risk. Renal replacement therapy is a life-sustaining intervention that can provide a bridge to renal recovery; no method has proven to be superior, but careful management is essential for improving outcome.

Clinical experience with argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a large teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for the prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The product monograph does not guide clinicians beyond specifying the initial dose of 2 μg/kg per minute (or 0.5 μg/kg per minute for patients with hepatic impairment). Some authors have suggested that in the intensive care unit (ICU) and for patients with acute cardiac disease and those with renal or hepatic dysfunction, this dose may result in a supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of argatroban in adult patients with suspected HIT in a large teaching hospital, and to review dosing for patients in the ICU, patients with acute cardiac disease, and patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction.

METHODS

Charts of patients with suspected HIT who had received argatroban for at least 24 h between October 1, 2005, and October 1, 2007, at the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria, with charts available for review. Of these, 21 (70%) patients had an initial argatroban dose of 2 μg/kg per minute and 4 (13%) had an initial dose of 0.5 μg/kg per minute. The median duration of therapy was 6 days, and the mean dose was 2.14 μg/kg per minute. There were 122 dosage adjustments, the most common change being 0.5 μg/kg per minute, followed by adjustments of 1 and 0.1 μg/kg per minute. Six patients had supratherapeutic aPTT values (above 100 s), and none experienced major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that an initial argatroban dose of 2 μg/kg per minute is appropriate for patients with no hepatic dysfunction. Patients with acute cardiac disease and critically ill patients may require lower doses of argatroban; however no dosage adjustments are required for patients with renal dysfunction.

Reducing harm associated with anticoagulation: practical considerations of argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a hepatically metabolized, direct thrombin inhibitor used for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and for patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this review is to summarize practical considerations of argatroban therapy in HIT. The US FDA-recommended argatroban dose in HIT is 2 microg/kg/min (reduced in patients with hepatic impairment and in paediatric patients), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline (not >100 seconds). Contemporary experiences indicate that reduced doses are also needed in patients with conditions associated with hepatic hypoperfusion, e.g. heart failure, yet are unnecessary for renal dysfunction, adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity. Argatroban 0.5-1.2 microg/kg/min typically supports therapeutic aPTTs. The FDA-recommended dose during PCI is 25 microg/kg/min (350 microg/kg initial bolus), adjusted to achieve activated clotting times (ACTs) of 300-450 sec. For PCI, argatroban has not been investigated in hepatically impaired patients; dose adjustment is unnecessary for adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity, and lesser doses may be adequate with concurrent glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Argatroban prolongs the International Normalized Ratio, and published approaches for monitoring the argatroban-to-warfarin transition should be followed. Major bleeding with argatroban is 0-10% in the non-interventional setting and 0-5.8% periprocedurally. Argatroban has no specific antidote, and if excessive anticoagulation occurs, argatroban infusion should be stopped or reduced. Improved familiarity of healthcare professionals with argatroban therapy in HIT, including in special populations and during PCI, may facilitate reduction of harm associated with HIT (e.g. fewer thromboses) or its treatment (e.g. fewer argatroban medication errors).

[Argatroban: pharmacological properties and anaesthesiological aspects]

Argatroban is a direct, selective and reversible active site thrombin inhibitor derived from L-arginine. It is a representative of a new class of antithrombotic drugs which offer inhibition of clot-bound as well as fluid-phase thrombin. Argatroban is characterised by favourable pharmacokinetics (beta-elimination half-time approximately 40-50 min) undergoing hepatic metabolism and mainly biliary excretion. Renal impairment will not result in altered or delayed elimination. For many years, argatroban has been used in Japan and in the United States and is approved by the FDA for anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). The ease of monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time, lack of induction of antibodies and adequate safety in renal failure patients, make this drug a favourable mode therapy in comparison with other anticoagulants such as lepirudin or heparinoids. Since June 2005 argatroban has been approved in Germany for the treatment of patients with HIT type II. The main characteristics of the drug with special considerations for anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians are presented in this review.

Safety, efficacy, and dosing requirements of bivalirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dosing requirements of bivalirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven adults with a diagnosis or history of HIT who were treated with bivalirudin between January 1, 2004, and March 31, 2007.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients had a mean +/- SD age of 50 +/- 16 years and weighed 80 +/- 20 kg; 62% were male, 73% were Caucasian, and 95% were treated in the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into three renal function groups for assessment of bivalirudin dosing requirements: creatinine clearance (Cl(cr)) greater than 60 ml/minute (12 patients, group 1); Cl(cr) 30-60 ml/minute (11 patients, group 2); and Cl(cr) lower than 30 ml/minute or receiving continuous renal replacement therapy ([RRT] 14 patients, group 3). Except for renal function, baseline demographic characteristics were similar among groups. A total of 19 (51%) of the 37 patients achieved goal activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) with initial mean +/- SD bivalirudin doses of 0.14 +/- 0.04 (median 0.15), 0.1 +/- 0.07 (median 0.08), and 0.05 +/- 0.05 (median 0.05) mg/kg/hour in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Doses remained similar over the study period and were 0.13 +/- 0.04 (median 0.15), 0.1 +/- 0.06 (median 0.1), and 0.04 +/- 0.02 (median 0.03) mg/kg/hour for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean +/- SD aPTT value after achieving goal range was 64 +/- 9 seconds (all patients). Bivalirudin dosing requirements correlated with Cl(cr) (r(2) = 0.37, p<0.0001). Therapy duration was a mean +/- SD of 11 +/- 13 days (median 7 days). Systemic thrombosis and bleeding while receiving bivalirudin were also evaluated. Thrombosis occurred in one patient; clinically significant bleeding occurred in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin dosing requirements correlated with renal function; therefore, dosage reduction is required in patients with moderate or severe renal dysfunction. Starting bivalirudin at 0.15 mg/kg/hour in patients with Cl(cr) greater than 60 ml/minute, 0.08-0.1 mg/kg/hour in patients with Cl(cr) 30-60 ml/minute, and 0.03-0.05 mg/kg/hour in patients with Cl(cr) below 30 ml/minute or receiving continuous RRT is effective at achieving goal aPTT values in most patients.

Weight-based argatroban dosing nomogram for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Manufacturer recommendations for argatroban use in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) state that the dosage should be titrated to a goal activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 1.5-3 times the baseline aPTT. The lack of a clear dosing strategy with argatroban may result in delayed stabilization of aPTT. There are no published nomograms to guide the dosing of argatroban.

OBJECTIVE

To study the anticoagulant effect and incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events in patients receiving argatroban, with doses determined using a weight-based nomogram.

METHODS

Patients with suspected or documented HIT at an 800-bed teaching community hospital were prospectively treated, in a nonrandomized, nonblinded manner, with argatroban; dosage adjustments were made according to 1 of 2 variations of a dosing nomogram: standard or hepatic/critically ill. The primary outcomes were time to aPTT stabilization and percentage of patients whose aPTTs were within the therapeutic range of 45-90 seconds at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients whose aPTTs were subtherapeutic, supratherapeutic, or above the therapeutic threshold of 45 seconds at each time interval; incidence of thrombotic events; number of dosage adjustments to achieve stabilization; and number of major bleeding events.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were prospectively treated using the standard (n = 34) and hepatic/critically ill (n = 17) nomograms. Mean time to aPTT stabilization was 16.25 hours with the standard nomogram and 27.05 hours with the hepatic/critically ill nomogram. The percentages of patients with aPTTs within the therapeutic range at each time interval were 82.4%, 82.4%, 88.2%, 96.4%, 100%, and 100% with the standard nomogram and 58.8%, 82.4%, 76.5%, 93.3%, 100%, and 90.9% with the hepatic/critically ill nomogram. There were no thrombotic events after the initiation of argatroban. Three cases of major bleeding occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram is an effective dosing tool for achieving and maintaining therapeutic levels of anticoagulation.

Role of citrate and other methods of anticoagulation in patients with severe liver failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy

Anticoagulation is required during continuous renal replacement therapy to prevent filter clotting and optimize filter performance. However, anticoagulation may also be associated with serious bleeding complications. Patients with liver failure often suffer from underlying coagulopathy and are especially prone to anticoagulation complications. The aim of this review is to present the unique features of patients with hepatic injury in terms of anticoagulation disorders and to analyze data on safety and efficacy of the different anticoagulation methods for liver failure patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy

Premature circuit clotting is a major problem in daily practice of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), increasing blood loss, workload, and costs. Early clotting is related to bioincompatibility, critical illness, vascular access, CRRT circuit, and modality. This review discusses non-anticoagulant and anticoagulant measures to prevent circuit failure. These measures include optimization of the catheter (inner diameter, pattern of flow, and position), the settings of CRRT (partial predilution and individualized control of filtration fraction), and the training of nurses. In addition, anticoagulation is generally required. Systemic anticoagulation interferes with plasmatic coagulation, platelet activation, or both and should be kept at a low dose to mitigate bleeding complications. Regional anticoagulation with citrate emerges as the most promising method.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Argatroban is considered to be an alternative anticoagulant of choice in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and renal impairment. The recommended initial dose in HIT is 2 microg/kg/min (0.5 microg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline. Although argatroban is predominantly hepatically metabolized with minimal renal clearance, recent limited data have suggested that a patient's renal function should also be considered when initiating argatroban therapy for HIT. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in HIT patients with normal hepatic function, with the goal of refining dosing guidance, if needed.

METHODS

From case records of previous prospective studies of argatroban in clinically diagnosed HIT, we identified patients who had baseline laboratory data on liver and renal function. Individuals with abnormal hepatic function (serum total bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dl or ALT or AST > 100 U/l) were excluded. Patients were stratified according to their estimated creatinine clearance (CL(cr)): normal or mild impairment (CL(cr) > 60 ml/min), moderate impairment (CL(cr) 30-60 ml/min), or severe impairment (CL(cr) < 30 ml/min). Argatroban doses, aPTTs, and clinical outcomes were summarized overall and by group. By-patient relationships between CL(cr) and dose or aPTT during therapy were explored using regression analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis population included 260 patients with normal to mild (n = 144), moderate (n = 80), or severe (n = 36) renal impairment. Argatroban was initiated at a mean infusion dose of 1.8 +/- 0.7 microg/kg/min (overall), titrated to achieve aPTTs 1.5-3 times baseline. Among renal function groups, no significant differences occurred in argatroban dose during therapy (overall value, 1.9 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min), duration of therapy (7 +/- 6 days), or aPTTs (63 +/- 17 s). Regression analyses showed a 0.1 microg/kg/min increase in dose (r2 = 0.02) for each 30 ml/min increase in CL(cr). Within a 37 day follow-up, 46 (17.7%) patients died, most often when severe renal impairment was present. New thrombosis (11.5% overall) and major bleeding (5.0%) did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of HIT patients with normal hepatic function and varying levels of renal function, argatroban administered in accordance with current recommendations provided adequate levels of anticoagulation and was well tolerated. Altered renal function did not clinically significantly affect argatroban doses, aPTT responses, or rates of thrombosis or bleeding. These findings further support argatroban as an alternative anticoagulant of choice, without need for initial dose adjustment, in most patients with HIT and renal impairment.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

We retrospectively evaluated the effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in HIT patients with normal hepatic function, with the goal of refining current dosing guidance, if needed. From previous prospective studies of argatroban in HIT, we identified 260 patients with clinically diagnosed HIT, normal hepatic function, and varying degrees of renal function. Among patients whose renal function was normal or mildly impaired (estimated creatinine clearance, CL(cr) > 60 ml/min); moderately impaired (CL(cr) 30-60 ml/min), or severely impaired (CL(cr) < 30 ml/min), no significant differences occurred in the argatroban dose, aPTT response, duration of therapy, or rates of thrombosis or major bleeding. By regression analysis, there was a clinically insignificant 0.1 microg/kg/min increase in dose for each 30 ml/min increase in CL(cr). Overall, argatroban administered in accordance with current recommendations provided adequate levels of anticoagulation and was well tolerated, supporting its use as an alternative anticoagulant of choice, without need for initial dose adjustment, in most patients with HIT and renal impairment.

Argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with hepatic dysfunction

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the dosing requirements in argatroban-treated patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and hepatic dysfunction, and compared efficacy and safety outcomes with historical control patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Inpatient setting.

PATIENTS

Patients with hepatic dysfunction, defined as total bilirubin > 25.5 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase >100 IU/L, and/or alanine aminotransferase >100 IU/L, were identified from previous multicenter, historical-controlled studies of argatroban therapy in HIT.

INTERVENTIONS

Argatroban, adjusted to maintain activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5 to 3 times baseline in the experimental group, vs no direct thrombin inhibition in the historical control patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The analysis population included 82 argatroban patients and 34 historical control patients with hepatic impairment, of whom approximately 50% in each group had renal dysfunction (defined as a serum creatinine level > 1.3 mg/dL). The argatroban dosage was 1.6 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min (mean +/- SD) over a mean 5-day course of therapy. Significantly lower doses were used in patients with elevated vs normal total bilirubin levels (0.8 +/- 0.6 microg/kg/min vs 1.7 +/- 0.8 microg/kg/min, p = 0.0063) and in patients with hepatic/renal dysfunction vs hepatic dysfunction alone (1.2 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min vs 2.0 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min, p < 0.001). The aPTT 24 h after argatroban initiation was 69 +/- 22 s, with 80% of patients having a therapeutic level of anticoagulation. Thirty-four argatroban-treated patients (41.5%) and 17 control patients (50.0%) experienced the 37-day composite end point of death, amputation, or new thrombosis (p = 0.32). Argatroban significantly reduced new thrombosis (8.5% vs 26.5%, p = 0.012). Major bleeding was similar between treatment groups (4.9% vs 2.9%, p = 0.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic dysfunction affects argatroban dosing, with reduced doses required particularly in patients with serum total bilirubin levels > 25.5 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL) or combined hepatic/renal dysfunction. Individual mean aPTT-adjusted doses typically remain > or = 0.5 microg/kg/min, supporting the recommendation of 0.5 microg/kg/min as a conservative initial dose for most patients with hepatic impairment. Argatroban, with proper initial dosing and monitoring, can provide safe and effective antithrombotic therapy in patients with HIT and hepatic impairment.

Argatroban in Post-Cardiovascular Surgery Patient with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Requiring Hemodialysis and Continuous Hemofiltration

Objective:

To describe the use of argatroban in a postoperative cardiovascular surgery patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring hemodialysis and continuous veno-veno hemofiltration (CVVH).

Case Summary:

A 23-year-old white woman with HIT developed acute renal failure after cardiovascular surgery. Argatroban was used as a substitute for heparin during hemodialysis and CVVH. Both activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) were used to guide the dosage of argatroban. The patient was successfully dialyzed without clotting of the circuit. The dosage required in our patient was much lower than the manufacturer's recommendation.

Discussion:

Argatroban is a selective thrombin inhibitor that does not cross-react with heparin-induced antibodies. It is metabolized by the liver, and dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment. The correct dosage for patients with unstable hemodynamics is not known. Our patient had apparently normal hepatic function at the initiation of therapy, but the dosage of argatroban recommended by the manufacturer resulted in prolonged elevation of the aPTT and ACT with associated gastrointestinal bleeding. This may be due to hepatic congestion secondary to poor cardiac function and/or severe generalized edema.

Conclusions:

When argatroban is considered for therapy in place of heparin for CVVH, it needs to be used with extreme caution since the correct initial dosage in patients with mild hepatic impairment and unstable hemodynamics is unclear.

The Management of Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Anticoagulant Therapy

For patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), reexposure to heparin is generally not recommended. However, these patients are likely to require anticoagulation therapy at some point in the future. During acute HIT, when thrombocytopenia and anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies (or HIT antibodies) are present, therapy with heparin must be avoided. In patients with subacute HIT, when platelets have recovered but HIT antibodies are still present, therapy with heparin should be avoided. In patients with a remote history of HIT, when HIT antibodies have cleared, heparin reexposure may be safe, although recurrent HIT has been described in some patients. For all of these patients, the use of alternate anticoagulant agents, including direct thrombin inhibitors and anti-Xa agents, is preferable. There is an increasing amount of data supporting the use of these alternative agents in a wide variety of clinical circumstances, including thromboprophylaxis and treatment of acute thrombosis. Except for a few clinical situations, it is generally possible to avoid heparin reexposure in patients with a history of HIT.

Argatroban and Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND:

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is an effective anticoagulant for patients who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Anticoagulation is usually required for renal replacement therapy (RRT).

OBJECTIVE:

To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of argatroban during RRT in hospitalized patients with or at risk for HIT.

METHODS:

Five patients with known or suspected HIT underwent hemodialysis (n = 4) or continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH, n = 1), while receiving a continuous infusion of argatroban 0.5–2 μg/kg/min. Activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), activated clotting times (ACTs), argatroban concentrations (plasma, dialysate, CVVH effluent), and safety were assessed before, during, and after a 4-hour session of RRT. Systemic and dialytic argatroban clearances were calculated.

RESULTS:

Among the 4 hemodialysis patients, aPTT, ACT, and plasma argatroban concentrations remained stable during RRT, with respective mean ± SD values of 74.3 ± 34.2 seconds, 198 ± 23 seconds, and 499 ± 353 ng/mL before RRT, and 70.6 ± 21.4 seconds, 181 ± 12 seconds, and 453 ± 295 ng/mL 2 hours after starting RRT (p values NS). Systemic clearance was 17.7 ± 12.8 L/h before hemodialysis and 17.0 ± 9.5 L/h during hemodialysis (n = 2). The dialyzer clearance (dialysate recovery method) was 1.5 ± 0.4 L/h (n = 4). Generally similar responses occurred in the CVVH patient: systemic argatroban clearance was 4.8 L/h before CVVH and 4 L/h during CVVH. The hemofilter argatroban clearance was 0.9 L/h. No bleeding or thrombosis occurred.

CONCLUSIONS:

Argatroban provides effective alternative anticoagulation in patients with or at risk for HIT during RRT. Argatroban clearance by high-flux membranes during hemodialysis and CVVH is clinically insignificant, necessitating no dose adjustment.

Alternatives to Heparin Infusion

This article offers an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This disorder is an immune-mediated reduction of platelets with subsequently increased generation of thrombin and increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can occur as an isolated incident or with acute thrombosis (HIT with thrombosis syndrome [HITTS]). Proper recognition, cessation of all forms of heparin (and compounds that cross-react with heparin), and rapid initiation of nonheparin anticoagulation are essential steps in reducing the risk of death, limb amputation, and new thrombotic events. Current alternatives to heparin are reviewed.

Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy

Understanding the frequency, risk factors, and management of anticoagulant-induced adverse events will assist clinicians in optimizing patient outcomes. The most frequent adverse event of all anticoagulants is major bleeding. Risk factors for major bleeding have been identified with the heparin compounds, the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), fondaparinux, and warfarin therapy. Understanding these risk factors can help prevent bleeding events. For cases of clinically significant bleeding, reversal agents exist primarily for heparin and warfarin. Although less common, nonbleeding adverse events of anticoagulant therapy can also be life threatening. The heparin compounds are associated with the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. HIT can result in life-threatening thrombosis and is usually managed with a DTI. Nonbleeding adverse events with warfarin therapy include skin reactions and the development of venous limb gangrene. Appropriate initiation of warfarin therapy may decrease the risk of venous limb gangrene.

Ximelagatran: a new antithrombotic option in atrial fibrillation

Treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation typically involve pharmacologic or interventional invasive therapies to suppress the rhythm, control ventricular contraction rates, or prevent thromboembolic complications. Current therapies used for rhythm conversion in atrial fibrillation may have undesirable risks or side effects that limit this approach. Lifelong anticoagulation may be necessary to prevent the formation of thrombus in the left atrial chamber that can travel into the cerebral circulation to cause a stroke. Currently, warfarin is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for this purpose. Unfortunately, many patients with atrial fibrillation may not receive warfarin because of the difficulties in dosing and maintaining desirable target goals. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran has several pharmacologic properties that provide a unique and potentially desirable treatment option. Clinical studies have demonstrated that ximelagatran, administered in twice-daily doses of 36 mg, is non-inferior to warfarin for thromboprophylaxis against stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. The pharmacology of ximelagatran and clinical trials with its use in atrial fibrillation is reviewed.

Ximelagatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), and to review available comparative clinical trial data evaluating its efficacy and safety relative to other antithrombotic agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases (1995-August 2004), supplemented by a manual search of article bibliographies, conference abstracts, and data on file from the manufacturer, was conducted. Key search terms were ximelagatran, melagatran, H376/95, and direct thrombin inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from available clinical trials, including study design, patient demographics, dosing regimens, anticoagulant comparators, methods for evaluating effectiveness, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ximelagatran is an orally administered DTI under development for use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), long-term prevention of a second VTE event, stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation, prevention of VTE after orthopedic procedures, and recurrent ischemic events after acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ximelagatran, in twice-daily doses of 24 or 36 mg, is an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins or warfarin in thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic knee replacement, atrial fibrillation, or initial treatment of VTE. Improved outcomes versus placebo were seen in the long-term prevention of VTE in patients who completed an initial 6 months of treatment. Liver-related effects need further clarification.