Guidelines for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Treatment

Feasibility and safety of 1-min sit-to-stand test in acute decompensated heart failure confirmed by lung ultrasound

Aim

This study innovatively proposed the 1-min sit-to-stand test (1-min STST) as an assessment tool for functional capacity in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), in which its feasibility and safety were investigated.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center cohort study. The 1-min STST was performed after the first 48 h of admission when vital signs and Borg score were collected. Lung ultrasound was used to measure pulmonary edema by B-lines before and after the test.

Results

Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 40% were in functional class IV on admission. The mean age was 58.3 ± 15.7 years and 40% of the patients were male. 95% patients accomplished the test and the average number of repetitions was 18 ± 7. No adverse event was recorded during or after the 1-min STST. Blood pressure, heart rate, and degree of dyspnea were increased after the test (all p < 0.001), while oxygen saturation was slightly decreased (97.0 ± 1.6 vs. 96.3 ± 2.0%, p = 0.003). The degree of pulmonary edema (χ2 = 8.300, p = 0.081) was not significantly changed, while there was a reduction in the absolute number of B-lines [9 (3, 16) vs. 7 (3, 13), p = 0.008].

Conclusion

The application of the 1-min STST in early stage of ADHF appeared to be safe and feasible, which induce neither adverse event nor pulmonary edema. It may serve as a new tool of functional capacity assessment, as well as a reference of exercise rehabilitation.

System Design for Optimizing Drug Infusions Using Cardiovascular Space Mapping for Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure is caused by various factors and requires multiple drug therapies to remedy underlying causes. Due to the complexity of pharmacologic effects of cardiovascular agents, few studies have theoretically addressed the multidrug optimization problem. This paper proposes a drug infusion system for acute heart failure that controls cardiovascular performance metrics (cardiac output, left atrial pressure, and mean arterial pressure) within desired ranges as dictated by the cardiovascular parameters (systemic vascular resistance, cardiac contractility, heart rate, and stressed blood volume). The key to our system design is modeling and controlling cardiovascular parameters to yield the desired cardiovascular metrics. A 'tailored drug infusion' technique controls parameters by solving the optimization problem in order to conquer the complexity of multi-dependencies and the different dosage limits among multiple drugs. A 'cardiovascular space mapping' technique identifies the desired parameters from the desired metrics by deriving the analytical solutions of the metrics as functions of the parameters. To facilitate clinical discussions, parameters were set to realistic values in 5,600 simulated patients. Our results showed not only that the optimized drug combinations and dosages controlled the cardiovascular metrics to within the desired ranges, but also that they mostly corresponded to the recommended clinical use guidelines. An additional value of our system is that it proactively predicts the limitations of the tailored drug therapy, which supports the clinical decision of pivoting to alternative treatment strategies such as mechanical circulatory support.

Hospital Policies for Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Background:

It is unclear to what extent hospitals use guidelines or protocols in treating acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and whether nesiritide is included in these guidelines or protocols.

Objective:

To assess the formulary status of currently used drugs, therapeutic guidelines, and perceptions about the appropriateness of treatment of ADHF in community hospitals.

Methods:

A Web-based survey of pharmacy directors at community hospitals that were part of a national group purchasing organization was conducted.

Results:

One hundred seven hospitals participated in the survey (response rate 47.1%). Diuretics such as furosemide and bumetanide were more commonly included (100% and 94.4%, respectively) on hospital formularies than was torsemide (69.2%). Dopamine and dobutamine were more common (94.4% each) on the formulary than was milrinone (68.2%), Nitroprusside and nitroglycerin were listed on the formularies of more than 90% of participating institutions, while nesiritide was listed on the formularies in only 48.6% of hospitals and was placed on restricted status in 36.4% of hospitals. Guidelines for care of patients with ADHF were used in the emergency department (ED), inpatient care units, and outpatient clinics in 18.6%, 43.0%, and 8.5% of hospitals, respectively. Overall, ADHF care, including general treatment as well as specific use of nesiritide, was deemed appropriate in the majority of patients, but nearly twice as many respondents perceived the management of ADHF and specific use of nesiritide as inappropriate in the ED compared with inpatient treatment. Only 41.1% of the respondents reported following Braunwald recommendations for the use of nesiritide.

Conclusions:

A sizable percentage of responding community hospitals do not have guidelines for treatment of ADHF despite the existence of such guidelines in the literature. There are opportunities for improvement in the general treatment of ADHF as well as for the use of nesiritide in ADHF, especially in the ED or observation unit versus inpatient units.

Neurogenic stunned myocardium in subarachnoid hemorrhage

"Stunned myocardium," characterized by reversible left ventricular dysfunction, was first described via animal models using transient coronary artery occlusion. However, this phenomenon has also been noted with neurologic pathologies and collectively been labeled "neurogenic stunned myocardium" (NSM). Neurogenic stunned myocardium resulting from subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a challenging pathology due to its diagnostic uncertainty. Traditional diagnostic criteria for NSM after SAH focus on electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities and troponemia. However, tremendous heterogeneity still exists. Traditional pathophysiological mechanisms for NSM encompassed hypothalamic and myocardial perivascular lesions. More recently, research on pathophysiology has centered on myocardial microvascular dysfunction and genetic polymorphisms. Catecholamine surging as a mechanism has also gained attention with particular focus placed on the role of adrenergic blockade in both the prehospital and acute settings. Management remains largely supportive with case reports acknowledging the utility of inotropes such as dobutamine and milrinone and intra-aortic balloon pump when NSM is accompanied by cardiogenic shock. Neurogenic stunned myocardium that follows SAH can result in many complications such as arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, and prolonged intubation, which can negatively impact long-term recovery from SAH and increase morbidity and mortality. This necessitates the need to accurately diagnose and treat NSM.

Hospital Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalizations for elderly adults in the United States. One in 5 Americans will be >65 years of age by 2050. Because of the high prevalence of HF in this group, the number of Americans requiring hospitalization for this disorder is expected to rise significantly. We reviewed the most recent and ongoing studies and recommendations for the management of patients hospitalized due to decompensated HF. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry, together with the 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association heart failure guidelines, earlier retrospective and prospective studies including the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE), the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in the Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF), the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF), the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT) and the Comparison of Medical, Pacing and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial were reviewed for current practices pertaining to these patients. Gaps in our knowledge of optimal use of patient-specific information (biomarkers and comorbid conditions) still exist.

Nesiritide: Trials and Tribulations

Standard therapy for acute decompensated heart failure, a major health problem, consists of intravenous diuretics, vasodilators, and positive inotropic agents. Nesiritide, a recombinant form of human B-type natriuretic peptide, is the only drug specifically approved for this indication. Recent meta-analyses have reported an increased risk of worsening renal function and 30-day mortality with nesiritide administration. These data understandably require physicians to carefully reevaluate their current use of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. In performing this reevaluation, it is important to consider our understanding of the underlying disease state, the limitations and results of these meta-analyses, and new data that provide additional insight into the possible risks and benefits associated with nesiritide therapy. Until additional therapeutic trials are conducted, therapeutic choices must be based on symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement and limited, imperfect available data, which may continue to support the use of nesiritide for its established indication.

Intravenous Nitroglycerin in the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure: Potential Benefits and Limitations

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a common cause of hospitalizations. Intravenous nitroglycerin is widely used in the treatment of this condition. The use of this drug is based on its nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory effect, which can lead to beneficial hemodynamic effects as well as improvement of myocardial ischemia and reduction of mitral regurgitation. However, information regarding the use of nitroglycerin for ADHF is limited to mostly hemodynamic evaluations in small groups of patients without cardiovascular outcome data. A single randomized, placebo controlled study that evaluated commonly used doses of nitroglycerin in patients with ADHF was disappointing and failed to show a significant hemodynamic effect or improvement of symptoms compared with placebo. The potential benefit of nitroglycerin seems to be limited by a decreased vasodilatory response in patients with heart failure, which requires an active titration of the drug and the use of high doses (>120 µg/min). In addition, the initial beneficial hemodynamic effect achieved with the appropriate dose of nitroglycerin is associated with neurohumoral activation and limited by an early development of nitrate tolerance that leads to a marked attenuation of the initial effect. More information obtained in large-scale studies that are appropriately designed to evaluate the effect of variable doses of nitroglycerin on short- and long-term cardiovascular outcome, with and without interventions shown to prevent nitrate tolerance, is needed before intravenous nitroglycerin can be recommended as a standard therapy for ADHF.

Nitrates for acute heart failure syndromes

BACKGROUND

Current drug therapy for acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) consists mainly of diuretics supplemented by vasodilators or inotropes. Nitrates have been used as vasodilators in AHFS for many years and have been shown to improve some aspects of AHFS in some small studies. The aim of this review was to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of nitrate vasodilators in AHFS.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect of different nitrate preparations (isosorbide dinitrate and nitroglycerin) and the effect of route of administration of nitrates on clinical outcome, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nitrates in the management of AHFS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to July week 2 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to week 28 2011). We searched the Current Controlled Trials MetaRegister of Clinical Trials (compiled by Current Science) (July 2011). We checked the reference lists of trials and contacted trial authors. We imposed no language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing nitrates (isosorbide dinitrate and nitroglycerin) with alternative interventions (frusemide and morphine, frusemide alone, hydralazine, prenalterol, intravenous nesiritide and placebo) in the management of AHFS in adults aged 18 and over.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed data extraction. Two authors performed trial quality assessment. We used mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to measure effect sizes. Two authors independently assessed and rated the methodological quality of each trial using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies (634 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Two of the included studies included only patients with AHFS following acute myocardial infarction (AMI); one study excluded patients with overt AMI; and one study included participants with AHFS with and without acute coronary syndromes.Based on a single study, there was no significant difference in the rapidity of symptom relief between intravenous nitroglycerin/N-acetylcysteine and intravenous frusemide/morphine after 30 minutes (fixed-effect MD -0.30, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.05), 60 minutes (fixed-effect MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.25), three hours (fixed-effect MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.67) and 24 hours (fixed-effect MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.31). There is no evidence to support a difference in AHFS patients receiving intravenous nitrate vasodilator therapy or alternative interventions with regard to the following outcome measures: requirement for mechanical ventilation, systolic blood pressure (SBP) change after three hours and 24 hours, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) change after 30, 60 and 90 minutes, heart rate change at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, three hours and 24 hours, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) change after three hours and 18 hours, cardiac output (CO) change at 90 minutes and three hours and progression to myocardial infarction. There is a significantly higher incidence of adverse events after three hours with nitroglycerin compared with placebo (odds ratio 2.29, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.16) based on a single study. There was no consistent evidence to support a difference in AHFS patients receiving intravenous nitrate vasodilator therapy or alternative interventions with regard to the following secondary outcome measures: SBP change after 30 and 60 minutes, heart rate change after 90 minutes, and PAOP change after 90 minutes. None of the included studies reported healthcare costs as an outcome measure. There were no data reported by any of the studies relating to the acceptability of the treatment to the patients (patient satisfaction scores).Overall there was a paucity of relevant quality data in the included studies. Assessment of overall risk of bias in these studies was limited as three of the studies did not give sufficient detail to allow assessment of potential risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no significant difference between nitrate vasodilator therapy and alternative interventions in the treatment of AHFS, with regard to symptom relief and haemodynamic variables. Nitrates may be associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects after three hours compared with placebo. However, there is a lack of data to draw any firm conclusions concerning the use of nitrates in AHFS because current evidence is based on few low-quality studies.

Ultrafiltration in the management of acute decompensated heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Admissions to hospital for acute decompensated heart failure continue to increase and represent a significant burden on both patients' and healthcare resources. The majority of these admissions are for the control of volume overload; however, standard treatment with intravenous diuretics is not always effective and can lead to increased renal morbidity. One alternative to standard therapy is mechanical fluid removal with ultrafiltration, this review will highlight the current evidence and efficacy regarding ultrafiltration use in acute heart failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple recent clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of ultrafiltration in the management of acute heart failure. Ultrafiltration may be more effective at removing fluid than standard diuretic therapy and has been associated with beneficial long-term results. However, it remains to be determined whether ultrafiltration is truly nephroprotective and when and how this therapy is best utilized.

SUMMARY

Ultrafiltration is an attractive alternative to standard diuretic therapy in the management of volume overload from acute heart failure. Further research is needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness and to determine long-term impacts on morbidity and mortality.

A retrospective, observational cohort analysis of a nationwide database to compare heart failure prescriptions and related health care utilization before and after publication of updated treatment guidelines in the United States

BACKGROUND

The current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) clinical guidelines for heart failure (HF), published September 20, 2005, provide a summary of the best evidence for treatment, but these recommendations are not always reflected in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to compare 6-month prescribing habits in the United States before and after the publication of updated clinical guidelines for the evaluation and management of HF and the impact of these prescribing habits on health care resource use.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort analysis used the Humana nationwide health insurance administrative claims database that includes -3.5 million covered members from all 50 states and Puerto Rico who are enrolled in a health maintenance organization, a preferred provider organization, or a Medicare plan. The data included demographics (age, sex, type of insurance, and geographic location), medical information with up to 9 diagnostic codes per encounter, codes for procedures and medical equipment, laboratory tests, and pharmacy-dispensed medications. HF medication prescriptions and health care utilization were evaluated for 2 cohorts: those identified from claims before guideline publication (January 1, 2005-June 30, 2005) and those identified from claims after publication (October 1, 2006-March 31, 2007). Patients were eligible if they were aged ≥45 years, had 12 months of continuous enrollment (6 months before and 6 months after the index date, defined as the date of diagnosis or hospitalization for HF), and had ≥1 claim for HF. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received prescriptions for HF medications individually or in combination. Secondary outcomes were adherence to medication, all-cause and HF-specific hospitalizations, and emergency department and outpatient physician visits.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age in the before-publication cohort (n = 29,784) was 75 (11) years; in the after-publication cohort (n = 33,598), it was 74 (11) years (P < 0.001). Half of all patients in each cohort were female (50% [n = 14,796 and n = 16,803, respectively]); 9% (n = 2539) of the before-publication cohort and 7% (n = 2283) of the after-publication cohort were classified as having moderate to severe HF based on the baseline number of hospitalizations (P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the before-publication cohort received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (43% [12,811/29,784] vs 44% [14,776/33,598]; P = 0.01), β-blockers (37% [10,901/29,784] vs 41% [13,639/33,598]; P < 0.01), angiotensin receptor blockers (10% [3008/29,784] vs 13% [4378/33,598]; P < 0.01), or hydralazine (3% [865/29,784] vs 4% [1378/33,598]; P < 0.01). Among those with moderate to severe HF, there were no significant differences between groups in the use of combination therapy (ie, β-blockers with any combination of isosorbide dinitrate, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or hydralazine; all combinations, P = NS between cohorts), except for less use of a β-blocker with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker among the before-publication cohort (23% [595/2539] vs38% [875/2283]; P = 0.005). Therewere significantly fewer all-cause and HF-related outpatient visits, all-cause and HF-related hospitalizations, and all-cause and HF-related emergency department visits in the after-publication cohort (all, P < 0.001); however, the absolute differences in the proportions of patients in each cohort who required such services were relatively small.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this analysis of real-world prescribing patterns, only small differences in prescribing practices were found before and after the 2005 publication of the ACC/AHA guidelines for HF treatment. Health care utilization was slightly, but significantly, reduced after publication of the guidelines.

Natriuretic and neurohormonal responses to nesiritide, furosemide, and combined nesiritide and furosemide in patients with stable systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure, few data describe the neurohormonal response to nesiritide and furosemide either alone or in combination. This study systematically compared the effects of nesiritide, furosemide, and their combination on natriuresis/diuresis and plasma aldosterone in patients with chronic stable heart failure who were relatively diuretic resistant.

HYPOTHESIS

Natriuretic, diuretic, and neurohormonal responses to furosemide and nesiritide will differ when these agents are administered alone vs. in combination.

METHODS

Twenty-eight subjects completed a multicenter, open-label, three-arm crossover study. Each subject received the following treatments in random order on alternate days: (1) furosemide, 40 mg intravenous bolus; (2) nesiritide, 2 microg/kg intravenous bolus followed by a 0.01 microg/kg/min infusion for 6 hours; (3) both furosemide and nesiritide, with furosemide given at least 15 minutes after initiation of nesiritide.

RESULTS

Plasma aldosterone increased by 2.2 +/- 1.6 ng/dL after furosemide alone, decreased by 3.9 +/- 1.6 ng/dL after nesiritide alone (P = 0.005 vs furosemide alone and P = 0.56 vs furosemide plus nesiritide), and decreased by 2.8 +/- 1.6 ng/dL after furosemide plus nesiritide (P = 0.02 vs furosemide alone).

CONCLUSIONS

Furosemide alone produced natriuresis/diuresis and a prompt rise in plasma aldosterone values. Nesiritide alone produced no significant natriuresis/diuresis, but decreased plasma aldosterone values. When furosemide was administered on a background of nesiritide infusion, the observed natriuresis/diuresis was similar to that seen with furosemide alone, without the anticipated increase in plasma aldosterone observed with furosemide alone.

Early vasoactive drugs improve heart failure outcomes

Vasoactive therapy is often used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The authors sought to determine whether clinical outcomes are temporally associated with time to vasoactive therapy (vasoactive time) in ADHF. Using the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHERE) Registry, the authors examined the relationship between vasoactive time and inpatient mortality within 48 hours of hospitalization. Vasoactive agents were used early (defined as <6 hours) in 22,788 (63.8%) patients and late in 12,912 (36.2%). Median vasoactive time was 1.7 and 14.7 hours in the early and late groups, respectively. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the early group (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.96; P=.006), and the adjusted odds of death increased 6.8% for every 6 hours of treatment delay (95% confidence interval, 4.2-9.6; P<.0001). Early vasoactive initiation is associated with improved outcomes in patients hospitalized for ADHF.

Cardiorenal syndrome: still not a defined entity

Because of the increasing incidence of cardiac failure and chronic renal failure due to the progressive aging of the population, the extensive application of cardiac interventional techniques, the rising rates of obesity and diabetes mellitus, coexistence of heart failure and renal failure in the same patient are frequent. More than half of subjects with heart failure had renal impairment, and mortality worsened incrementally across the range of renal dysfunctions. In patients with heart failure, renal dysfunction can result from intrinsic renal disease, hemodynamic abnormalities, or their combination. Severe pump failure leads to low cardiac output and hypotension, and neurohormonal activation produces both fluid retention and vasoconstriction. However, the cardiorenal connection is more elaborate than the hemodynamic model alone; effects of the renin-angiotensin system, the balance between nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species, inflammation, anemia and the sympathetic nervous system should be taken into account. The management of cardiorenal patients requires a tailored therapy that prioritizes the preservation of the equilibrium of each individual patient. Intravascular volume, blood pressure, renal hemodynamic, anemia and intrinsic renal disease management are crucial for improving patients' survival. Complications should be foreseen and prevented, looking carefully at basic physical examination, weight and blood pressure monitoring, and blood, urine urea and electrolytes measurement.

Risk and safety assessment of exogenous human brain natriuretic peptide in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)--a subchronic study

Safety evaluation of synthetic human brain natriuretic peptide (shBNP) was carried out in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) by 2-week intravenous toxicity studies. System exposure was also assessed throughout the whole administration. Three test groups received doses of 432, 1440 and 4320 microg/kg/day of shBNP, with a high infusion rate of 36 mL/kg/hr for 30 min compared to the clinical protocol of continuous infusion over 24h. Commercially available recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) of 1440 microg/kg/day was used as positive control. The 2-week repeated intravenous doses of shBNP resulted in reversible increased serum LDH and CPK in monkeys receiving 1440 and 4320 microg/kg/day dose with no pertinent histopathological changes. Some changes related to the pharmacologic effects of BNP including hypotension was observed after administration. No treatment-related mortalities or renal dysfunction were found. Controversy about the safety issue of BNP as an exogenous hormone concerning ventricular remodeling and myocardial cell apoptosis, coupled with our results, were also discussed. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was considered to be 432 microg/kg /day, which is about 20 times higher than the commonly used clinical dose. The results of the present study advocate the safety of shBNP in cynomolgus monkeys at levels used in the study.

Bridging the gap between evidence and practice in acute decompensated heart failure management

Registry data indicate a gap between evidence-based guidelines and current management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Bridging this gap is crucial given the frequency and cost of hospitalization for this disorder. Patients with ADHF require rapid assessment to determine appropriate treatment location and initial therapy. Patients with impending respiratory failure or cardiogenic shock should be managed in an intensive care setting, patients with congestion that is expected to require prolonged intravenous therapy should be admitted to the hospital, and patients with congestion that is likely to respond within 12-24 hours can be managed in an observation unit. Clinical status should guide selection of initial therapy. Initially, therapeutic response should be assessed every couple of hours. Once effective acute therapy has been established, it is important to implement strategies to improve long-term outcomes. These strategies include ensuring that care complies with established core performance measures, providing patient education in a manner suited to ensure comprehension and retention, and arranging for appropriate outpatient follow-up, ideally in a comprehensive heart failure disease management program. The purpose of this review is (1) to examine evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of ADHF, (2) to present a practical algorithm for patient assessment and treatment derived from these guidelines and personal experience, and (3) to discuss systems to enhance the ultimate transition of patient care from the inpatient to outpatient setting.

Hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure: recognition, risk stratification, and treatment review

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has emerged as a major healthcare problem. It causes approximately 3% of all hospitalizations in the United States, with the direct medical cost of these hospitalizations estimated at $18.8 billion per year. Early recognition, risk stratification, and evidence-based treatment are crucial in reducing the morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with this disorder. Classic signs and symptoms of ADHF, such as rales, dyspnea, and peripheral edema, may be absent at hospital presentation and, even when present, are not specific to this disorder. As a result, serum B-type natriuretic peptide level is now used to rapidly and accurately detect ADHF. Multivariate analyses have identified renal dysfunction, hypotension, advanced age, hyponatremia, and comorbidities as significant and independent mortality risk factors. Based on these factors, mortality risk can be stratified from very low to very high using published algorithms that have been validated in independent populations. Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of ADHF are available from both the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Failure Society of America. In general, an intravenous loop diuretic, either alone or in combination with a vasodilator, is recommended as initial therapy in patients with volume overload, depending on the patient's clinical status. Use of inotropic agents should be limited to the small subset of patients with low-output syndrome and significant hypotension. In any event, frequent monitoring of clinical response is essential, with subsequent therapy determined by this response. Finally, focused patient education during hospitalization may help reduce readmissions for ADHF.

Effect of Short Call Admission on Length of Stay and Quality of Care for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Background— In response to residency work hour restrictions, programs restructured call schedules, increasing the use of short call (daytime admitting teams). Few data exist on the effect of short call on quality of patient care. Our objective was to examine the effect of short call admission on length of stay and quality of care for patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Methods and Results— We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 218 patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure to the Nashville VA Medical Center between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2005. The primary exposure was short call, and the primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes—diuretic dosing, weight monitoring, and hospital complications—were determined through a combination of administrative data and chart review. Patients admitted to short call had a longer median length of stay than patients admitted to long call (5.2 days [25% to 75%, 3.2 to 8 days] versus 3.9 days [interquartile range, 2.7 to 6.5 days]; P =0.0004). After adjustment for covariates, short call had a 44% increase in length of stay (95% CI, 15 to 80) compared with long call. Short call patients received fewer diuretic doses in the first 24 hours of hospitalization (1.80 versus 2.12; P =0.014) and had a longer median time to the second dose of loop diuretics compared with long call patients (17.9 hours versus 16.2 hours; P =0.044).

Conclusions— Admission to short call is predictive of increased length of stay, a decreased number of diuretic doses, and delays in the timing of diuretics among patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Additional studies are needed to clarify the impact of short call admission on inpatient quality of care.

Impact of Treatment Guidelines on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Background:

No data exist that demonstrate the impact of comprehensive acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) treatment guidelines on clinical and economic outcomes in hospitalized patients with this condition.

Objectives:

To compare clinical and economic outcomes before and after implementation of treatment guidelines for ADHF.

Methods:

A single-center, retrospective, chart review study was conducted in a university hospital. ADHF treatment guidelines were developed and implemented on January 1, 2004. Patients hospitalized for ADHF between January 2003 and November 2004 were identified using the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Registry. Study periods were 12 months prior to and the 11 months following guideline implementation.

Results:

This cohort was comprised of 683 ADHF hospitalizations (357 preguideline, 326 postguideline); several patients were admitted more than once. There was a trend toward increased use of intravenous vasoactive drugs (VADs) following guideline implementation (19.9% vs 24.2%; p = 0.05). The duration of intravenous VAD use decreased by more than 40% following guideline implementation, but this was not statistically significant after risk adjustment (p = 0.22). The need for intensive care unit monitoring decreased from 45.1% before guideline implementation to 25.3% following guideline implementation (p < 0.02) in patients treated with intravenous VADs. The need for mechanical ventilation was reduced by nearly 80% (p = 0.04) following guideline implementation. Significantly more patients of the postguideline cohort were prescribed β-blockers at discharge (54.9% vs 75.2%; p = 0.0001). Costs were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions:

Implementation of ADHF treatment guidelines was associated with reduced need for mechanical ventilation, improved utilization of β-blockers at discharge, and trends toward increased use of intravenous VADs, while not significantly changing total costs. More rigorous studies need to be conducted to estimate the true effect of treatment guidelines on ADHF care and outcomes.

German guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis

This Gudelines are the translation of the German Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis, which were prepared by the Working Group on Infective Endocarditis of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society and the German Society for Cardiology, Heart, and Circulatory Research in cooperation with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Thorax-, Herz und Gefässchirurgie (DGTHG; German Society for Thorax-, Cardiac-, and Vascular Surgery), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Infektiologie (DGI; German Society for Infectious Diseases), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DGIIN; German Society for Internal Intensive Care Medicin and Emergency Medicine), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie (DGHM; German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin (DGIM; German Society for Internal Medicine) (Naber CK et al. [S2 Guideline for diagnosis and therapy of infectious endocarditis] Z Kardiol. 2004;93:1005-21). The Guidelines provide recommendations for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis.

Clinical and economic implications of new strategies for heart failure management in the managed care setting

Clinical pharmacists in all settings see a large number of patients with heart failure, many of whom are Medicare recipients. Clinical studies have identified appropriate drug therapy for patients with heart failure, and several professional organizations have compiled excellent guidelines. Regardless, many patients are not benefiting from treatment with drugs proven to help reduce morbidity and mortality. Following the evidence-based or consensus guidelines can reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with heart failure.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Nesiritide in the Treatment of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Nesiritide is a recombinant form of human B-type natriuretic peptide, a naturally occurring endogenous hormone released by cardiac ventricles in response to an increase in ventricular wall stress. Its use in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has been evaluated in a series of randomised controlled clinical trials. It is currently approved in the US for the treatment of ADHF. Nesiritide induces a balanced vasodilation and an indirect increase in cardiac output, but has no actual inotropic effects and exerts a neutral effect on heart rate. In addition, it inhibits adverse neurohormonal activation and, in some individuals, promotes natriuresis and diuresis. In adults with ADHF, nesiritide reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance; decreases symptoms of heart failure; and enhances global clinical status. Important questions regarding the risks of nesiritide therapy have recently been raised, and resolution of the safety of nesiritide is a process that remains in evolution. The most frequently reported adverse effect is dose-related hypotension. In addition, nesiritide may cause an acute increase in serum creatinine concentration. This increase seems to be a haemodynamic response to a combination of volume depletion, vasodilation and neurohormonal inhibition. Nesiritide-induced changes in renal function have not been definitively shown to negatively affect mortality. The effect of nesiritide on all-cause mortality is currently unresolved. Recent meta-analyses of existing databases have raised concerns regarding adverse effects of the drug on 30-day mortality. However, reviews of large, observational, registry databases do not suggest an adverse inpatient mortality effect compared with other vasodilator therapies. Further resolution of the mortality question awaits completion of pending randomised controlled clinical trials. When used for approved indications and according to recommended dosage and administration regimens, nesiritide represents a reasonable treatment adjunct for ADHF.

Practical applications of intravenous diuretic therapy in decompensated heart failure

Intravenous (IV) loop diuretics play an important role in the treatment of decompensated heart failure (DHF). They inhibit the Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) reabsorptive pump in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle, and the resultant natriuresis and diuresis decreases volume load, improves hemodynamics, and reduces DHF symptoms. However, loop diuretics have a short half-life and their efficacy may be limited by postdiuretic sodium rebound during the period between doses in which the tubular diuretic concentration is subtherapeutic. Moreover, they can produce electrolyte abnormalities, neurohormonal activation, intravascular volume depletion, and renal dysfunction. Several studies have reported an association between diuretic therapy and increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, many patients, especially those with more advanced forms of heart failure (HF), are resistant to standard doses of loop diuretics. These high-risk, resistant patients may benefit from pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic interventions to improve hemodynamic performance, treatment of renovascular disease, discontinuation of aspirin and other sodium-retaining drugs, manipulation of the route of delivery or combination of diuretic classes, or hemofiltration. Despite >50 years of use, many questions regarding the use of intravenous diuretic agents in patients with DHF are still unanswered, and there remains a compelling need for well-designed randomized, controlled clinical trials to establish appropriate treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefit while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

The confounding issue of comorbid renal insufficiency

The United States is currently beleaguered by twin epidemics, heart failure (HF) and renal insufficiency (RI). HF and RI frequently coexist in the same patient, and this conjunction, often called the "cardiorenal syndrome," has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Approximately 60% to 80% of patients hospitalized for HF have at least stage III renal dysfunction as defined by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), and this comorbid RI is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality risk. Numerous studies have demonstrated that in patients with HF, indices of renal function are the most powerful independent mortality risk predictors. Comorbid RI can result from both intrinsic renal disease and inadequate renal perfusion. Atherosclerosis, renal vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are significant precursors of both HF and RI. Moreover, diminished renal perfusion is frequently a consequence of the hemodynamic changes associated with HF and its treatment. Both HF and RI stimulate neurohormonal activation, increasing both preload and afterload and reducing cardiac output. Inotropic agents augment this neurohormonal activation. In addition, diuretics can produce hypovolemia and intravenous vasodilators can cause hypotension, further diminishing renal perfusion. Management of these patients requires successfully negotiating the delicate balance between adequate volume reduction and worsening renal function. Despite this, few evidence-based data are available to guide management decisions, indicating a compelling need for additional studies in this patient population.

Beyond diuretics: management of volume overload in acute heart failure syndromes

Diuretics are an established foundation of therapy for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) as well as for those hospitalized for treatment of acute HF syndromes. Despite the accepted use of diuretics in acute HF syndromes, treatment patterns with diuretics vary widely, and there are no data from randomized studies on the benefit of diuretics on morbidity or mortality in patients hospitalized with acute HF syndromes. Additional pharmacologic therapies that complement or replace diuretics in this setting, especially in patients with diuretic resistance, include positive inotropes, nitrovasodilators, and natriuretic peptides, but data are likewise lacking on important clinical outcomes. Ultrafiltration has also been used as a nonpharmacologic strategy to treat patients with acute HF syndromes who exhibit resistance to diuretics. Effective monitoring of volume status with newer modalities may allow more selective use of diuretics and diuretic-like modalities, but additional randomized trial data are clearly needed to establish ideal strategies to promote volume removal in acute HF syndromes.

Short and long-term mortality with nesiritide

BACKGROUND

Nesiritide (recombinant human B-type natriuretic peptide) has been shown to provide symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement in acute decompensated heart failure. A previous meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials has suggested an increased short-term risk of death with nesiritide use. We performed a meta-analysis of 7 available randomized controlled trials to evaluate the short- and long-term risk of death with nesiritide use for acute decompensated heart failure.

METHODS

Seven large randomized controlled nonmortality trials on nesiritide with available data on 30-day mortality were included. Data on 180-day mortality were available only in 4 trials. Mortality data in nesiritide and control arms were extracted from the selected trials and the nesiritide database (Scios Inc, Fremont, CA).

RESULTS

The pooled estimate of the relative risks (RRs) for unadjusted 30- and 180-day mortality revealed no significant differences between the nesiritide arm (RR 1.243, 95% CI 0.798-1.935) and control arm (RR, 0.002, 95% CI 0.798-1.259), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike a previous analysis, our meta-analysis indicates that nesiritide is not associated with a higher 30- or 180-day mortality. Further analysis of mortality adjusted for confounding variables such as nesiritide dose, duration of infusion, concurrent use of inotropes, heart failure stage, and arrhythmias may reveal subgroups in jeopardy. Large-scale randomized controlled trials powered to evaluate mortality are required to conclusively address these findings.

Perioperative management of chronic heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the few cardiac conditions that is increasing. Despite a better understanding of how hormones and other signaling systems underlie the pathophysiology, and despite improved outcomes from pharmacologic therapy, many HF patients receive no effective treatment. Patients with HF commonly require medical diagnosis and management in operating rooms and critical care units; thus anesthesiologists are obliged to remain up-to-date both with advances in outpatient (chronic) medical management and with inpatient treatments for acute exacerbations of HF. Accordingly, we reviewed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, and aldosterone antagonists because these drugs prolong life and are included in current clinical practice guidelines for treating patients with chronic HF. We also reviewed the implications of chronic HF for patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia and discuss how best to provide intensive treatment for acute exacerbations of symptoms, such as might be caused by excessive intravascular volume, inappropriate drug "holidays," or worsening of the underlying cardiac disease.

Optimizing treatment and outcomes in acute heart failure: beyond initial triage

Heart failure contributes substantially to health care costs in the United States due to its prevalence and frequent necessity for repeat hospitalizations to manage episodes of acute decompensation. Heart failure overwhelmingly impacts Medicare costs, as the highest proportion of heart failure patients are older than 65 years of age. Efforts to reduce morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilization have been achieved successfully through emergency department-based heart failure observation units. For select patients, the observation unit can provide care with effective oral agents, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, and diuretics, as well as administration of other vasoactive agents, followed by a discharge plan of effective heart failure education and rigorous follow-up management. As advanced pharmacologic and diagnostic therapies continue to emerge, the observation unit staff can play an integral role in the critical education and self-management tools that are needed by the patient to ultimately improve outcomes and quality of life.

Dobutamine versus milrinone after subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Neurogenic stunned myocardium is a well-recognized complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Dobutamine and milrinone are both used for neurogenic stunned myocardium, but there are few data comparing them after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

We compared the physiological dose response of dobutamine and milrinone in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring a pulmonary artery catheter. We located 11 patients who received either inotrope. Physiological data were fitted to a mixed model accounting for drug, dose, and between-patient variation.

RESULTS

There were 11 patients who had 152 pulmonary artery catheter measurements. Two received both inotropes (but not within 4 h of each other), 2 only milrinone, and 7 only dobutamine. The groups had similar clinical and physiological characteristics. After adjustment for vasopressin, milrinone was significantly more potent in increasing cardiac output (P <0.0001) and stroke volume (P=0.03), while decreasing vascular resistance (P <0.0001) and systolic blood pressure (P=0.008), than dobutamine.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that milrinone and dobutamine should be used in different clinical situations. Milrinone may be more effective in patients with severely depressed systolic function but who have at least normal vascular resistance and blood pressure and in whom raising cardiac output is the primary goal. Dobutamine may be superior when vascular resistance or blood pressure is low.

Nesiritide in cardiovascular anesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute heart failure has become a major medical issue in the western population. Because mortality is still as high as 50%, the treatment of these patients has been the focus of many studies. A new approach has recently been proposed, including B-type natriuretic peptide as a medication. The purpose of this review is to discuss these new developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide may serve as a marker for the severity of acute decompensated heart failure. Nesiritide, which is the recombinant equivalent of B-type natriuretic peptide, is a vasodilator, acting by increasing cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate in the vascular smooth muscle cells. It is mainly considered to be an alternative for nitroglycerin, because it has fewer side-effects, and its activity is more prolonged. Treatment with nesiritide has shown fewer arrhythmias and a lower mortality rate compared with dobutamine and milrinone. In cardiac surgery, nesiritide is mainly administered to patients awaiting heart transplantation, but intraoperatively the doses of nesiritide and anesthetics must be adjusted because of a potential interaction. A few anecdotal reports have shown the advantageous effects of nesiritide in the early post-bypass period.

SUMMARY

Anesthesiologists will be confronted with increasing numbers of patients with heart failure, who require new forms of medication. Nesiritide is a promising new tool, and its application, which is still mainly restricted to the preoperative period, will probably soon be extended to the early post-bypass period.

Contemporary Issues in the Pharmacologic Management of Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure is an evolving syndrome that continues to be defined by ongoing studies and registries. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and places a huge economic burden on health care systems. Improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic processes has prompted interest into understanding the implications of current and future pharmacologic management strategies beyond hemodynamics. Diuretics, vasodilators, and inotropes remain the mainstays of therapy with several new classes of agents on the horizon. Clinicians should understand the rationale for use and limitations of each therapy to maximize benefit and cost-effectiveness, while minimizing the potential for adverse outcomes.

Acute Congestive Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

Acute heart failure and cardiogenic pulmonary edema is a common cause of respiratory distress among patients presenting to the emergency department. The emergency department is frequently the primary entry point into the health care system for these patients and is the site of initial stabilization, evaluation, and management of the patient.Emergency physicians, alongside cardiologists, play a critical role as these patients are treated in the emergency department and transferred to the cardiac ICU. The approach to the critically ill patient who has heart failure should be multidisciplinary and involve the emergency physician and the cardiologist who will care for the patient.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: diagnosis and management

Heart failure remains a common diagnosis, especially in older individuals. It continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, but major advances in both diagnosis and management have occurred and will continue to improve symptoms and other outcomes in patients. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society published its first consensus conference recommendations on the diagnosis and management of heart failure in 1994, followed by two brief updates, and reconvened this consensus conference to provide a comprehensive review of current knowledge and management strategies. New clinical trial evidence and meta-analyses were critically reviewed by a multidisciplinary primary panel who developed both recommendations and practical tips, which were reviewed by a secondary panel. The resulting document is intended to provide practical advice for specialists, family physicians, nurses, pharmacists and others who are involved in the care of heart failure patients. Management of heart failure begins with an accurate diagnosis, and requires rational combination drug therapy, individualization of care for each patient (based on their symptoms, clinical presentation and disease severity), appropriate mechanical interventions including revascularization and devices, collaborative efforts among health care professionals, and education and cooperation of the patient and their immediate caregivers. The goal is to translate best evidence-based therapies into clinical practice with a measureable impact on the health of heart failure patients in Canada.

Overview of acute decompensated heart failure in Argentina: lessons learned from 5 registries during the last decade

BACKGROUND

The acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is not as well characterized as the chronic phase, particularly in Latin American countries. Thus, the aim of this overview was to describe the clinical profile, treatment, and inhospital course of ADHF during the last decade in Argentina.

METHODS

Results obtained from 5 Argentinean prospective and multicenter registries, involving 2974 patients admitted for ADHF, were assessed. These registries were performed and published between 1992 and 2004.

RESULTS

The mean age was 65 to 70 years, and nearly 40% were female. Coronary artery disease was the main etiology in nearly 30% of the patients. Between 1992 and 2004, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased from 29.9% to 53.4% before admission and from 48.5% to 69.3% before discharge; the use of beta-blockers rose from 4.2% to 33.2% at admission and from 2.5% to 42.4% at predischarge (all P < .0001). Inhospital mortality rates in the first to the fifth registries were 12.1%, 4.6%, 10.5%, 8.9%, and 4.7% (P [trend] = .006). However, there were 98 (7.7%) deaths among 1272 patients before 2002, compared with 129 (7.6%) among 1702 since 2002 (P = .9).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical profile of this largest sample of ADHF reported from a Latin American country is different from that observed in clinical trials and comparable to registries worldwide. Although an improvement in the use of recommended drugs was observed in the last decade, the average mortality has not changed. These findings might have implications in the design of multinational clinical trials.

United States emergency department visits for acute decompensated heart failure, 1992 to 2001

Heart failure is a significant public health problem. The epidemiology and practice pattern of emergency department (ED) visits for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) have not been well characterized. A better description is essential to highlight areas in which improvements or additional research are needed. We analyzed all ED visits for ADHF of patients>or=40 years old using the data of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1992 to 2001. During this 10-year period, an estimated 10.5 million ED visits occurred for ADHF, representing 2.9% of all ED visits. The number of ADHF visits increased on average by 18,500 per year, for a 19.4% absolute increase during the decade. The rate per 1,000 United States population was unchanged. The average patient was 74 years old, and patients>or=65 years accounted for 79% of visits. Loop diuretics were administered in 63% and vasodilators in 29% of visits. The ED visit rate per 1,000 United States population was 53% higher in blacks than in whites (14.2 vs 9.3). In a multivariate model, white race was a significant predictor of hospitalization. In conclusion, during the past decade, the absolute number of ED visits for ADHF has increased owing to the aging population. Diuretics remain the most common treatment. Race-related differences in hospitalization merit additional study.

The benefits of early vasoactive therapy in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure

PURPOSE

To review current issues in the management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), focusing on the early initiation of intravenous (i.v.) vasoactive therapy and including the effects of vasoactive drugs on patient outcomes and the benefits and limitations of each medication class.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the worldwide scientific literature on ADHF.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ADHF may be improved by early initiation of i.v. vasoactive therapy, reduced use of inotropic agents, and judicious use of diuretics. Data to date suggest that early treatment with the natriuretic peptide nesiritide reduces duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and requirements for i.v. inotropes and diuretics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Advance practice nurses play an integral role in the management of patients with ADHF from initial triage in the emergency department through final discharge from the hospital. Because they are typically responsible for administering medications and monitoring patient status, nurses need to be familiar with the benefits and limitations of each class of vasoactive agent. They need to recognize that prompt initiation of i.v. vasodilator therapy is important for improving patient outcomes. Further, advance practice nurses should participate in team management that promotes the use of evidence-based ADHF care by developing, using, and assertively communicating the need for processes of care that facilitate best practices.

Strategies to reduce length of stay and costs associated with decompensated heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical problem in the United States, imposing significant economic burden on the health care system. Despite therapeutic advances, HF-associated morbidity and mortality continue to increase. Compliance with therapeutic guidelines for the management of chronic HF is far from ideal, increasing the likelihood that patients will experience multiple episodes of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during the course of HF disease. Prevention, streamlined inpatient care, effective vasoactive therapy, and initiation of proven long-term therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers, are all targets for improvement. Because of the chronic nature of heart failure, a successful disease management program for ADHF must also include effective outpatient care.

Factors that influence prescribing within a therapeutic drug class

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The decision to prescribe one drug instead of another within the same therapeutic class may be influenced by a variety of drug-related, direct, or indirect factors; but little is known about which considerations are most important in such choices. The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) represent a class of drugs that are commonly used and for which therapeutic equivalence has been debated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare factors perceived by doctors and clinical pharmacists to be influential in prescribing decisions among LMWHs.

METHODS

Doctors and clinical pharmacists were interviewed to elicit information and to rank factors that influence the prescribing and use of LMWHs in community hospitals in the United States. For each factor, the mean and median of the rating were determined along with the frequency distribution across ratings. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to examine differences between doctors and clinical pharmacists.

RESULTS

Both groups considered efficacy, formulary status, and policies restricting drug use to be highly influential in the decision to use one LMWH instead of another. Compared to clinical pharmacists, doctors rated personal experience as more influential, whereas they rated drug cost and prescribing guidelines lower.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that doctors and clinical pharmacists differentiate between LMWHs based on differences between products and because of hospital administrative programs (such as drug formularies). This information may be of value in designing programs to alter medication use.

Nesiritide in a pediatric oncology patient with renal insufficiency and myocardial dysfunction following septic shock

Nesiritide is a recombinant formulation of B-type natriuretic peptide used most commonly in the treatment of adults with decompensated congestive heart failure. The physiologic effects of BNP include natriuresis, diuresis, and smooth muscle relaxation. These physiologic effects result in its beneficial therapeutic effects, including a decrease in afterload, resulting in increased cardiac output with improved peripheral perfusion. The authors report on a 17-year-old with acute myelogenous leukemia who was admitted to the Pediatric ICU for treatment of septic shock, respiratory failure, myocardial dysfunction, and renal insufficiency. After the initial stabilization of his hemodynamic status, nesiritide was started and resulted in a stable balance of fluid intake versus output without the use of diuretics, improvement in myocardial function, and recovery of renal function manifested by a decrease of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine back to baseline values. The end-organ effects of nesiritide, previous reports regarding its use in the pediatric population, and its potential applications in the ICU setting are discussed.

Management of chronic heart failure: An old disease with a new face

Heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. It affects over 5 million patients annually. There are an estimated 400,000-700,000 new cases diagnosed each year. The management of heart failure has changed significantly over the last decade. This review focuses on the pharmacologic management of systolic heart failure, and provides current recommendations for the practicing acute care provider.

Medication Safety Issues in the Emergency Department

Medications used in emergency medicine are often "high alert" medications that have to be handled with deliberation. These medications, used every day in the emergency department, are associated with numerous errors. Even newer medications are prone to error. This makes it important for emergency department nurses and health care professionals to develop and implement mechanisms for preventing error. Safety data has shown that these "high alert" medications must be handled appropriately.

The Role of Hospitalists in the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart failure and episodes of acute decompensated heart failure have an important effect on the US health care system, especially the elderly Medicare population. Efforts to improve the quality of care for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure have focused on creating standardized treatment guidelines based on substantial clinical evidence, but inadequate implementation of these guidelines continues to result in excess morbidity and mortality from heart failure. Hospitalists specializing in inpatient treatment strategies may play an important role in implementing clinical guidelines because their main commitment is to overall clinical treatment of inpatients. This review focuses on current recommended guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure and the hospitalist's role in providing the oversight needed to adhere to these guidelines and manage this complex disease state.