How Can Osteoporosis Patients Benefit More from Their Therapy? Adherence Issues with Bisphosphonate Therapy

Vague sensations. About the background and consequences of discordance between actual and perceived physiological changes

Empirical evidence consistently shows that discordance, also called dissociation or discrepancy, between actual physiological (mainly visceral) events and their perceived counterparts is substantial. On the one hand, we typically do not perceive actual visceral events occurring in our bodies; on the other hand, sometimes we do perceive bodily changes that do not really take place. This narrative review presents the available empirical findings on the discordance, and summarizes possible explanations that approach the phenomenon from the viewpoint of evolution, cognitive development, and predictive processing. Also, the role of top-down factors, such as expectations and experiences is discussed. Finally, practically relevant consequences of the discordance are presented using the examples of mind-body practices, the placebo and nocebo phenomenon, and medically unexplained symptoms. It is concluded that the discordance between actual and perceived body changes can have a negative impact on health, mainly through issues with adherence and other behavioral factors. The existence of actual-perceived discordance should be taught and demonstrated in the elementary and high school, as well as in many areas of higher education.

Assessment of medication adherence among Lebanese adult patients with non-communicable diseases during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional study

Background

Medical treatment is considered a cornerstone in non-communicable diseases (NCDs) management, lack of adherence remains the main challenge that may compromise optimal therapeutic outcome achievement.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate treatment adherence levels and associated factors among Lebanese adult patients with non-communicable diseases.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional survey conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown imposed by the Lebanese Government (between September 2020 and January 2021) enrolled 263 adult patients through an anonymous online questionnaire to assess adherence to medications using the Lebanese Medication Adherence Scale (LMAS-14).

Results

Of the total sample, 50.2% showed low adherence with a total mean adherence score of 4.41 ± 3.94. The results showed that depression (β = 1.351) and peptic ulcer (β = 1.279) were significantly associated with higher LMAS scores (lower adherence). However, age between 50 and 70 (β = -1.591, p = 0.011), practicing physical exercise (β = -1.397, p = 0.006), having kidney disease (β = -1.701, p = 0.032), and an intermediate (β = -1.336, p = 0.006) to high income (β = -3.207, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower LMAS scores (higher adherence).

Conclusion

Our study shed light on the factors affecting medication adherence in patients with non-communicable diseases. It showed that depression and peptic ulcer were associated with lower adherence, contrary to older age, exercising, having chronic kidney disease, and a higher socioeconomic status.

Effectiveness of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density in osteopenic postmenopausal women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Various bisphosphonate agents have been proven to be effective in preventing bone loss and fracture in osteopenic postmenopausal women. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of various BPs on preventing the loss of bone mineral density (BMD) for postmenopausal women with osteopenia.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were screened up to identify randomized controlled trails comparing effectiveness of BPs or placebo on the BMD of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Network meta-analysis and standard pair-wise meta-analyses were performed. The main outcomes include the percentage changes of 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month BMD at lumbar, total hip and femoral neck, and frequencies of new fractures and severe adverse events.

RESULTS

Fourteen randomized controlled trials were eligible, involving 11,540 participants. No significant difference was presented among the available interventions for the 6-month BMD at 3 different sites, but the magnitudes of differences among the treatment regimens became gradually increased along with the extending of follow-up periods. Daily aledronate of more than 5 mg provided the maximal percentage increase on BMD of femoral neck and lumbar spine, while zoledronate provided maximal change on BMD of total hip, at different follow-up periods. This network meta-analysis also demonstrated similar frequencies of new clinical fractures and severe adverse events among different interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

A ranking spectrum depicting the effectiveness on BMD percentage change following interventions with different bisphosphonate regimens was provided. Generally, regimens with zoledronate and aledronate were found to be the most effective interventions in the 3 sites at different end points.

Understanding the Experience of Osteoporosis Risk in Bariatric Surgical Patients

Despite what is known about risk factors, preventive treatment, and increased prevalence of fragility fractures in post-bariatric surgical patients, little is known about how patient perspectives of osteoporosis risk inform their commitment to bone health. The purpose of this study was to examine the lived experience of osteoporosis risk in people who have had bariatric surgery. Interpretive phenomenology was used to explore osteoporosis from the perspectives of patients who have had bariatric surgery. Eligibility criteria included female, age older than 18 years, and able to understand and speak English. This research provided an understanding of the risk of osteoporosis from the constructed realities and experiences of those who have had bariatric surgery. Participants in this study incorrectly felt they had little to no risk for osteoporosis after bariatric surgery. Patients need to be aware of an increased risk for osteoporosis leading to the potential for fragility fractures after bariatric surgery; nurses are well positioned to enhance osteoporosis prevention efforts in this population through pre- and postoperative education.

Randomized trial comparing efficacies of zoledronate and alendronate for improving bone mineral density and inhibiting bone remodelling in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonates are the first-line medications for treating osteoporosis. The aim of our prospective study was to compare the efficacy of zoledronate with that of alendronate in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis based on the evaluations of bone mineral density (BMD) and serum levels of biochemical markers of bone remodelling.

METHODS

Chinese women with post-menopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to the zoledronate (n = 52) or alendronate (n = 53) group, and were treated with 5 mg zoledronate intravenously once per year and 70 mg alendronate orally once per week, respectively. During a 3-year follow-up period, the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were examined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry every 12 months to assess BMD, and the serum levels of amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP) and carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type 1 collagen (CTX) were measured to evaluate bone formation and resorption, respectively.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Greater increases in BMD occurred in the zoledronate group over the 3-year follow-up period, with increases in BMD of 41·3%, 13·5% and 20·0% at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, respectively, compared with 16·9%, 5·88% and 8·93% in the alendronate group, respectively (P < 0·05 for all). At the 3-year follow-up, P1NP and β-CTX levels were reduced by 42·1% and 50·5% in the zoledronate group, respectively, whereas the levels of each were reduced by 19·5% and 19·4% in the alendronate group, respectively (P < 0·05 for all).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Once yearly zoledronate administered intravenously was more efficacious for improving BMD and reducing the serum levels of P1NP and β-CTX in Chinese women with post-menopausal osteoporosis than alendronate administered orally once per week. The incidence of adverse events after the second and third zoledronate treatments was substantially lower than that in the alendronate group, suggesting a substantially lower risk of adverse events with long-term use of zoledronate in Chinese women, compared with that of alendronate use.

Medical specialty-related adherence to anti-osteoporotic regimens in fragility hip fracture patients

There is poor adherence in the management of osteoporotic fractures. We designed a study to investigate adherence to osteoporotic regimens among osteoporotic hip fracture patients and to analyze the risk factors associated with poor compliance. This retrospective chart-review study was carried out using a database of osteoporotic hip fracture patients at a medical center in Taiwan for the period 2001-2007. Adherence was assessed using compliance and persistence. Compliance was calculated by the medication possession ratio (MPR) and persistence by the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation. The MPR and corresponding risk factors for poor compliance (MPR < 80 %) were evaluated for year 1. The year 2 results were analyzed only for those subjects with good compliance (MPR ≥ 80 %) at the end of year 1. There were 366 osteoporotic hip fracture patients (323 women, 43 men) with a mean age of 73.9 ± 7.6 years. Of these, 53.8 % had good compliance for year 1 and 68.5 % for year 2. During 2 years of follow-up, the overall persistence ratio was 33.1 %. The risk factor associated with poor compliance in the first year was index prescription by orthopedists [odds ratio (OR) 1.69, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.59]. Subjects with hypertension (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.46-0.99) had good compliance. Index prescription by orthopedists (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.31-4.51) was the sole risk factor for poor compliance in year 2. In conclusion, although adherence to osteoporotic regimens was sub-optimal in hip fracture patients, the majority of patients' decreased adherence occurred within the first year. Medical specialties showed different adherences in both year 1 and year 2.

Impact of the training on the compliance and persistence of weekly bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled study

Long-term patient adherence to osteoporosis treatment is poor despite proven efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of active patient training on treatment compliance and persistence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In the present national, multicenter, randomized controlled study, postmenopausal osteoporosis patients (45-75 years) who were on weekly bisphosphonate treatment were randomized to active training (AT) and passive training (PT) groups and followed-up by 4 visits after the initial visit at 3 months interval during 12 months of the treatment. Both groups received a bisphosphonate usage guide and osteoporosis training booklets. Additionally, AT group received four phone calls (at 2(nd), 5(th), 8(th), and 11(th) months) and participated to four interactive social/training meetings held in groups of 10 patients (at 3(rd), 6(th), 9(th), and 12(th) months). The primary evaluation criteria were self-reported persistence and compliance to the treatment and the secondary evaluation criteria was quality life of the patients assessed by 41-item Quality of Life European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) questionnaire. Of 448 patients (mean age 62.4±7.7 years), 226 were randomized to AT group and 222 were randomized to PT group. Among the study visits, the most common reason for not receiving treatment regularly was forgetfulness (54.9% for visit 2, 44.3% for visit 3, 51.6% for visit 4, and 43.8% for visit 5), the majority of the patients always used their drugs regularly on recommended days and dosages (63.8% for visit 2, 60.9% for visit 3, 72.1% for visit 4, and 70.8% for visit 5), and most of the patients were highly satisfied with the treatment (63.4% for visit 2, 68.9% for visit 3, 72.4% for visit 4, and 65.2% for visit 5) and wanted to continue to the treatment (96.5% for visit 2, 96.5% for visit 3, 96.9% for visit 4, and 94.4% for visit 5). QUALEFFO scores of the patients in visit 1 significantly improved in visit 5 (37.7±25.4 vs. 34.0±14.6, p<0.001); however, the difference was not significant between AT and PT groups both in visit 1 and visit 5. In conclusion, in addition to active training, passive training provided at the 1(st) visit did not improve the persistence and compliance of the patients for bisphosphonate treatment.

Adherence to osteoporosis regimens among men and analysis of risk factors of poor compliance: a 2-year analytical review

BACKGROUND

To investigate adherence and patient-specific factors associated with poor compliance with osteoporosis regimens among men.

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review study, we collected data on male patients with osteoporosis treated in accordance with therapeutic recommendations. Adherence was determined by the compliance and persistence of those patients who had been dispensed an osteoporosis regimen after an index prescription. All osteoporosis regimens were considered equivalent for the purpose of investigating adherence.

RESULTS

The prescriptions of 333 males met the inclusion criteria for data collection. The mean age was 68.6 ± 10.4 years. The median medication possession ratio (MPR, %) at years 1 and 2 was 90.1% (interquartile range (IQR) 19-100) and 53.7% (IQR 10.4-100), respectively; 52.3% of male patients at year 1 and 37.5% at year 2 had good compliance (defined as a MPR≧80%). The 1- and 2-year persistence rates were 45.9% and 30.0%, respectively. Patient-specific factors associated with poor compliance (MPR < 80%) during year 1 were first prescriptions given by orthopedists (odds ratio (OR) = 2.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.58-4.53; adjusted OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.26-4.22, p = 0.007). Male patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.78, adjusted OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.04-0.81, p = 0.025) and baseline bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.32-0.85; adjusted OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.28-0.93, p = 0.029) were less likely to have poor compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to osteoporosis regimens in males was suboptimal in our study. Poor compliance was more likely in prescription of the first anti-osteoporotic regimen by an orthopedist. Men with RA and BMD measurements before therapy had a lower risk of non-adherence. Healthcare professionals need to target patients with specific factors to improve adherence to osteoporotic regimens.

Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews

PURPOSE

A number of potential determinants of medication non-adherence have been described so far. However, the heterogenic quality of existing publications poses the need for the use of a rigorous methodology in building a list of such determinants. The purpose of this study was a systematic review of current research on determinants of patient adherence on the basis of a recently agreed European consensus taxonomy and terminology.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, IPA, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for systematic reviews published between 2000/01/01 and 2009/12/31 that provided determinants on non-adherence to medication. The searches were limited to reviews having adherence to medication prescribed by health professionals for outpatient as a major topic.

RESULTS

Fifty-one reviews were included in this review, covering 19 different disease categories. In these reviews, exclusively assessing non-adherence to chronic therapies, 771 individual factor items were identified, of which most were determinants of implementation, and only 47-determinants of persistence with medication. Factors with an unambiguous effect on adherence were further grouped into 8 clusters of socio-economic-related factors, 6 of healthcare team- and system-related factors, 6 of condition-related factors, 6 of therapy-related factors, and 14 of patient-related factors. The lack of standardized definitions and use of poor measurement methods resulted in many inconsistencies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides clear evidence that medication non-adherence is affected by multiple determinants. Therefore, the prediction of non-adherence of individual patients is difficult, and suitable measurement and multifaceted interventions may be the most effective answer toward unsatisfactory adherence. The limited number of publications assessing determinants of persistence with medication, and lack of those providing determinants of adherence to short-term treatment identify areas for future research.

Evaluation of persistence and adherence to teriparatide treatment in patients affected by severe osteoporosis (PATT): a multicenter observational real life study

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition leading to an increased risk of developing fractures, with high morbidity and mortality in aging population. Efficacy of anti-osteoporotic treatment is based on drug potency but also on compliance and persistence to treatment regimen, which is very low, as already described for other diseases. Teriparatide (TPTD) is the first anabolic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis. Since it appears that persistence to Teriparatide declines over time, aim of this pilot multicenter observational study was to evaluate persistence and adherence to TPTD (20 μg daily injection regimen for 18 months) treatment (PATT) in patients affected by severe osteoporosis in an every day clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients affected by severe osteoporosis were selected among those who referred to 5 different specialized centers for osteoporosis in North, Center and South of Italy. A sample of 475 women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with TPTD in accordance to the Italian osteoporosis guidelines was included. At the beginning of TPTD treatment patients were instructed on the use of the device by the referring specialist of the center, a resident fellow or a nurse. Bone biochemical markers were evaluated the same morning and after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Patients were visited at time 0 and after 6, 12 and 18 months for clinical follow up.

RESULTS

The results included observations of 441/475 patients (98% women) who completed the 18 months treatment; mean age for women was 73±8 and for men 65±9. After 6 months of TPTD treatment persistence was of 89,79%, 87,75% after 12 months and 86,85% after 18 months. Adherence was of 100% at 6,12 and 18 months. Total dropouts were 13,15% (71/441), which was usually higher within the first 6 months of TPTD treatment. Most common adverse events (arthralgies 2,7%, dizziness 1,8%, migraine 1,8%, depression 1,6%, hypertension 1,1%) were reported in 62/441 patients (14%) of patients, but were not reason for stopping treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The persistence and adherence to TPTD treatment obtained in this multicenter observational real life study was very high as compared to studies performed by others. These encouraging results suggest that different key factors such quality of information, frequency of visits, motivations given to patients, opportunity to call the doctor might play a pivotal role in the high persistence and adherence to TPTD treatment obtained in our study and need to be carefully considered before prescribing chronic anti-osteoporotic therapy.

Adherence and persistence with once-daily teriparatide in Japan: a retrospective, prescription database, cohort study

Adherence and persistence with osteoporosis treatments are essential for reducing fracture risk. Once-daily teriparatide is available in Japan for treating osteoporosis in patients with a high risk of fracture. The study objective was to describe real-world adherence and persistence with once-daily teriparatide 20 μg during the first year of treatment for patients who started treatment during the first eight months of availability in Japan. This prescription database study involved patients with an index date (first claim) between October 2010 and May 2011, a preindex period ≥6 months, and a postindex period ≥12 months and who were aged >45 years. Adherence (medication possession ratio (MPR)) and persistence (time from the start of treatment to discontinuation; a 60-day gap in supply) were calculated. A total of 287 patients started treatment during the specified time period; 123 (42.9%) were eligible for inclusion. Overall mean (standard deviation) adherence was 0.702 (0.366), with 61.0% of patients having high adherence (MPR > 0.8). The percentage of patients remaining on treatment was 65.9% at 180 days and 61.0% at 365 days. Our findings suggest that real-world adherence and persistence with once-daily teriparatide in Japan are similar to that with once-daily teriparatide in other countries and with other osteoporosis medications.

Poncirin prevents bone loss in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vivo and in vitro

Poncirin, a flavonoid isolated from the fruit of Poncirus trifoliata, possesses anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory activities. However, the action of poncirin in bone biology is unclear. In this study, the in vivo and in vitro effects of poncirin in a glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) mouse model were investigated. Seven-month-old male mice were assigned to the following five groups: (1) sham-implantation (sham), (2) prednisolone 2.1 mg/kg/day (GC), (3) GC treated with 10 mg/kg/day of genistein, (4) GC treated with 3 mg/kg/day of poncirin, (5) and GC treated with 10 mg/kg/day of strontium (GC + SrCl(2)). After 8 weeks, bone loss was measured by microcomputed tomography. Osteocalcin (OC) and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) were evaluated in sera. Runx2 protein, OC and osteoprotegerin (OPG) mRNA expression, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and mineral nodule assay were performed in C3H10T1/2 or primary bone marrow stromal cells. Poncirin significantly increased the bone mineral density and improved the microarchitecture. Poncirin increased serum OC, Runx2 protein production, expression of OC and OPG mRNA, ALP activity, and mineral nodule formation; and decreased serum CTX. These effects were more prominent in the poncirin group compared to the other positive control groups (genistein and strontium). The poncirin-mediated restoration of biochemical bone markers, increased bone mineral density, and improved trabecular microarchitecture likely reflect increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption in GIO mice.

Assessing adherence to teriparatide therapy, causes of nonadherence and effect of adherence on bone mineral density measurements in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fracture

OBJECTIVES

To determine (a) adherence rates at 6, 9 and 18 months amongst patients receiving teriparatide treatment for severe osteoporosis and (b) causes of therapy discontinuation and the effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) in adherent and nonadherent patients at different time intervals.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 111 patients receiving teriparatide from September 2004 to June 2007 was performed. Patients self-reports were used to record adherence and causes of nonadherence at 6, 9 and 18 months. BMDs for all patients were measured using the same DXA scanner at baseline and follow up.

RESULTS

Of 111 participants, 17 were male (mean age 60 years) and 94 were female (mean age 69 years). Of these, 12 did not initiate therapy and 4 were lost to follow up. Reported adherence was 89.6% at 6 months, 87.6% at 9 months and 74.7% at 18 months. Causes of nonadherence included cost (n = 4), no benefit (n = 1) and adverse events (n = 8). Common adverse events were leg cramps (n = 9), headache (n = 5) and myalgia (n = 4). Mean spine and femur BMD changes were 3.30% and 0.67% at 4-9 months respectively, and 5.39% and 0.77% at 10-18 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to teriparatide was almost 90% at 9 months and decreased to 75% at 18 months. Adverse events led to nonadherence in 20% of patients. Those who were nonadherent had lower baseline BMD values than those who were adherent. Changes in BMD at the lumbar spine were greater than changes observed at the femoral neck.

Impact of a pharmacist-directed intervention in postmenopausal women after fracture

PURPOSE

The impact of decentralized clinical pharmacy services on the implementation of appropriate care in postmenopausal women with a recent history of a fracture was assessed.

METHODS

Women 67 years of age or older with a documented fracture between January 1 and December 31, 2007, were identified in two geographic regions. At the intervention site, a decentralized clinical-pharmacy-based osteoporosis management service (CPOMS) intervened on postmenopausal women following fracture, while the comparison group utilized a centralized registered nurse to manage this population. In both groups, interventions included initiation of either osteoporosis medication or bone mineral density (BMD) screening.

RESULTS

Of the 827 women in the CPOMS group, 65% (523) initiated a medication for osteoporosis or completed BMD screening within 6 months of the fracture, compared with 46% (139) of the 302 women in the comparison group (p < 0.001; cumulative incidence ratio [CIR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.12). CPOMS patients were nearly twice as likely as comparison group patients to purchase osteoporotic medications (42% [347 of 827] versus 24% [73 of 302]; CIR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.50-2.40) and equally likely to undergo BMD testing (35% [289 of 827] versus 31% [94 of 302]; CIR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.91-1.39). Both interventions achieved results substantially higher than national averages. Of patients receiving a medication and continuous membership for 12 months, adherence was also significantly higher in the CPOMS group (46% [39 of 291] versus 28% [20 of 71], respectively; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

An integrated pharmacist-run osteoporosis management service demonstrated a substantial increase in the rate of osteoporosis drug initiation among post-menopausal women who experienced a fracture compared with a centrally located nurse-run service. BMD screening rates did not significantly differ between groups.

A literature review to investigate the link between psychosocial characteristics and treatment adherence in cancer patients

Adherence to medication has been recognized as a key issue in health outcomes and efforts to improve patients' adherence are being made by the pharmaceutical industry, experts, and government bodies alike. This paper presents a review of these issues according to previous descriptive findings. Relevant studies written in English, published in 1976 or later, were identified through Medline, Embase and PsycInfo databases and reviewed. Review articles and clinical trials were excluded; all observational studies and surveys were considered. Articles were reviewed for any discussion of patients' characteristics and psychosocial characteristics affecting adherence to cancer treatment. The search strategy included a combination of key words adherence and cancer in titles. The major findings are summarized and presented under two main headings: i) patients' characteristics; and ii) psychosocial characteristics. In general, factors associated with increased likelihood of adherence to cancer treatment included younger age, higher education, higher income and Caucasian ethnicity. With regards to the psychosocial factors, lower levels of depression and anxiety, optimism as well as social support seemed to have a positive effect on treatment adherence. Studies of patterns of care in cancer treatment can help identify challenges in health care provided to particular subgroups of cancer patients and can aid researchers in designing studies that account for such factors in clinical and outcomes' research.

Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic women

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease caused by a decrease in the bone mineral density. It is a major public health threat as it weakens bones, especially those in the wrist, spine, or hip, and causes them to break easily.

AIM

The study aimed to find how strictly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis adhere to a long-term therapy with bisphosphonates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted over a 24-month period. It included a total of 341 randomized patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis; the diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical and radiological evidence and a DXA T-score of the axial skeleton and the left hip less than -2.5 SD. Therapy included per os administration of alendonate 70 mg once a week or 50 mg of ibandronate once a month.

RESULTS

The patient medication persistence at the end of month 12 was 86.80%, and at the end of month 24 month - 58.94%. The medication possession ratio (MPR) in the bisphosphonate therapy at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months varied from 0.93 to 1.00. This suggests that there was a very good patient medication adherence of the study subjects to the 24-month treatment with bisphosphonates. The patient medication persistence dropped significantly at the end of month 12.

CONCLUSION

Compliance of patients with antiresorptive therapy depends on the specific socio-economic conditions and the attending physician's behaviour. Very rarely, treatment is discontinued because of adverse effects exerted by the drugs or because patients may not be convinced that they have osteoporosis.

A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change

The purpose of this literature review is to determine whether and to what extent current post-fracture osteoporosis interventions utilize theories of health behaviour change and whether those that are theory-based are more successful in producing desired behaviour changes. Studies were identified by applying additional criteria to the final selection stage of a systematic review of non-surgical osteoporosis interventions in the orthopaedic environment. We identified 42 primary studies targeted at patients and improving post-fracture osteoporosis care. As well as describing the studies (in terms of design, population, interventions, outcomes), we focused on theoretical framework and elements of behaviour change models. The 42 studies included in this review utilized a variety of post-fracture interventions; however, none of them reported using an underlying theoretical base. Only three studies drew on what we felt to be elements of a theoretical framework. The lack of theoretically based studies points to a currently under-utilized area of behaviour change research that could be applied to post-fracture interventions in order to make them more effective. Despite an abundance of literature supporting theories of behaviour change, post-fracture osteoporosis interventions do not report utilizing these theories. Theories of behaviour change could be applied to post-fracture osteoporosis interventions to explain why patients initiate osteoporosis management. Future research should explore the application of theories of health behaviour change to post-fracture interventions.

Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy following bone densitometry: importance of patient beliefs and understanding of DXA results

SUMMARY

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy remains low and identification of factors associated with better persistence is essential in preventing osteoporosis and fractures. In this study, patient understanding of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results and beliefs in effects of treatment were associated with treatment initiation and persistence.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to examine patient understanding of their DXA results and evaluate factors associated with initiation of and persistence with prescribed medication in first-time users of anti-osteoporotic agents. Self-reported DXA results reflect patient understanding of diagnosis and may influence acceptance of osteoporosis therapy. To improve patient understanding of DXA results, we provided written information to patients and their referring general practitioner (GP), and evaluated factors associated with osteoporosis treatment initiation and 1-year persistence.

METHODS

Information on diagnosis was mailed to 1,000 consecutive patients and their GPs after DXA testing. One year after, a questionnaire was mailed to all patients to evaluate self-report of DXA results, drug initiation and 1-year persistence. Quadratic weighted kappa was used to estimate agreement between self-report and actual DXA results. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of understanding of diagnosis, and correlates of treatment initiation and persistence.

RESULTS

A total of 717 patients responded (72%). Overall, only 4% were unaware of DXA results. Agreement between self-reported and actual DXA results was very good (κ = 0.83); younger age and glucocorticoid use were associated with better understanding. Correctly reported DXA results was associated with treatment initiation (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.2-15.1, p = 0.02), and greater beliefs in drug treatment benefits were associated with treatment initiation (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.006) and persistence with therapy (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that written information provides over 80% of patients with a basic understanding of their DXA results. Communicating results in writing may improve patient understanding thereby also improve osteoporosis management and prevention.

Adherence and profile of non-persistence in patients treated for osteoporosis--a large-scale, long-term retrospective study in The Netherlands

SUMMARY

We analyzed 12-month compliance for all ten oral osteoporosis drugs in the Netherlands by medication possession ratio (MPR ≥ 80%) in 105,506 patients, and persistence in 8,626 starters indicated high MPR (91%), low persistence (43%), and no restart in 78% of the stoppers after 18 months.

INTRODUCTION

We studied compliance and persistence for all available oral osteoporosis medications on a national scale in the Netherlands.

METHODS

We analyzed the IMS Health's longitudinal prescription database, which represents 73% of all pharmacies in the Netherlands. Twelve-month compliance was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) in a cross-sectional cohort of 105,506 patients who received at least three prescriptions. Twelve-month persistence (no gap in refills for >6 months) was measured in all 8,626 consecutive patients starting therapy, with a further follow-up in non-persistent patients during an additional 18 months for evaluation of switching, restart, or definitive stopping oral medication. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of characteristics of non-persistence.

RESULTS

MPR of ≥80% was found in 91% of patients. Persistence was 43% (range, 29-52%). Persistence was related to age >60 years (ORs, 1.41 to 1.64), pharmacy outside very dense urban area (ORs, 1.39 to 1.44), additional use of calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation (OR, 1.26 and CI, 1.13, 1.39) and use of glucocorticoids (OR, 0.65 and CI, 0.59, 0.72) or cardiovascular medication (OR, 0.88 and CI, 0.79, 0.97). Of non-persistent patients, 22% restarted within 18 months with oral osteoporosis drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year compliance for all available oral osteoporosis medications was high, but 1-year persistence was low. Most stoppers did not restart or switch during an additional 18-month follow-up. These data indicate a major failure to adequately treat patients at high risk for fractures in daily practice.

Factors affecting adherence to osteoporosis medications: a focus group approach examining viewpoints of patients and providers

PURPOSE

This qualitative study uses a focus group approach to determine factors influencing adherence to osteoporosis medications among older adults. Thirty-two patients aged 65 to 85 years from the Greater Boston area who were prescribed an osteoporosis medication, 11 general medicine physicians, and 1 nurse practitioner were recruited from Boston-based hospitals affiliated with a large health care system.

METHOD

Focus groups consisting of 6 to 8 subjects including men and women were held separately for providers and patients and conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Responses were obtained from patients and providers during the focus group interviews conducted by a trained focus group moderator. All interviews were audio taped and transcribed by a medical transcriptionist.

RESULTS

According to patients, factors affecting adherence to osteoporosis drugs included lack of knowledge about osteoporosis, dissatisfaction with their doctor visits, side effects, and difficulty or failure to remember instructions for taking medications. Physicians reported lack of patient knowledge, structural barriers, medication side effects, and the inability to track patients' adherence to their medications as barriers to adherence.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the extent of and reasons for nonadherence as perceived by patients and providers and provides insights into strategies to modify treatment plans to address nonadherence. The results from this study were used to develop a randomized controlled trial to conduct and evaluate patient- and physician-targeted interventions to improve adherence to osteoporosis medications and to examine cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies.

Strontium ranelate: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

This is a review of the pharmacology of strontium ranelate (Protelos, Protos, Protaxos, Bivalos, Osseor), and its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate is a divalent strontium salt of ranelic acid that is capable of increasing bone formation and reducing bone resorption, thereby uncoupling and rebalancing bone turnover in favour of bone formation. The drug is effective in reducing the risk of fractures, including both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, according to data from two large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials of 5 years' duration, and reduced the risk of hip fracture in high-risk patients in a post hoc analysis of one trial. Moreover, data from patients who continued to receive the drug during the 3-year extension phases of these trials indicate that strontium ranelate continues to provide protection against new vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures for up to 8 years of therapy. It also improves bone mineral density at numerous sites and both increases markers of bone formation and decreases markers of bone resorption. Strontium ranelate is administered orally as a suspension and is generally well tolerated. The nature of adverse events was generally similar regardless of treatment duration in clinical trials, with the most commonly reported being nausea and diarrhoea over 5 years of treatment, and memory loss and diarrhoea during longer-term treatment. Although an increased risk of venous thromboembolism was associated with strontium ranelate relative to placebo over 5 years of treatment in a pooled analysis of clinical trials, postmarketing data have not confirmed this finding. Overall, the clinical data available suggest that strontium ranelate is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The BMD muddle: the disconnect between bone densitometry results and perception of bone health

We conducted a phenomenological qualitative study to examine fracture patients' interpretations of their most recent bone densitometry results and perceptions of their current bone health. English-speaking outpatients who had sustained a fragility fracture in the previous 18-24 mo and reported having at least 1 previous bone mineral density (BMD) test were eligible. Data were collected through semistructured interviews in patients' homes. Patients were asked to describe their most recent BMD test results and perception of their bone health status based on these results. Eighteen patients (14 women and 4 men) aged 49-82 yr were recruited. BMD results showed bone density in patients to be normal (n=4), osteopenic (n=9), and osteoporotic (n=5). A correct diagnosis was recalled by 6 patients. Two common interpretations of BMD test results emerged: (1) no news was considered to be good news (n=9) and (2) evidence of compromised bone health was not considered to be serious or accurate (n=6). Medication adherence did not appear to be associated with perception of bone health or actual BMD results. Patients' perceptions of their current bone health did not correspond to the results of their most recent BMD test. Standardized bone densitometry reporting may improve patients' understanding of their bone health.

Physician perception of patient adherence compared to patient adherence of osteoporosis medications from pharmacy claims

OBJECTIVE

This study explored physicians' perceptions of patient adherence to medications compared with patient adherence derived by administrative data in the treatment of osteoporosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A study involving written questionnaires from prescribers treating patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) compared the questionnaire responses to pharmacy claims of these prescribers' patients' refill patterns. Approximately 2000 physicians from a large US health plan were faxed or mailed a survey. Data from the physician survey were merged with administrative claims data of the participating physicians' patients.

RESULTS

A total of 412 physicians (21.8%) responded. Although a low response rate, there were no significant demographic differences between participating and non-participating physicians. Surveyed physicians reported that 66% of their patients had private/commercial coverage and over 60% reported seeing their PMO patients annually. Overall, physicians estimated that 69.2% of patients were adherent 80% of the time after 12 months of therapy. Yet, pharmacy claims data for those physicians' patients indicated 48.7% of patients were adherent (defined as having an MPR of >or=80%) after 12 months of therapy. Physicians overestimated their patients' adherence regardless of medication class and across physician specialties. Regression modeling revealed that physicians who have been in practice longer estimated fewer patients as adherent, whereas those who prescribe more PMO treatments estimate a greater number of patients as adherent. Providers cited side effects and affordability of medication as the most frequent reasons for non-adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians overestimate patient adherence to PMO therapies. Improving physician awareness of medication non-adherence to PMO therapies may facilitate physician-patient dialogue, with the aim of identifying patient-centered reasons for non-adherence. These discussions are important because patients with poorer adherence have a higher risk of fracture. Future research should focus on reasons for patient non-adherence to osteoporosis regimens and intervention strategies that improve communication between the provider and patient. Findings must be considered within the limitations of this claims database analysis. Some degree of incomplete or incorrect coding may exist, and the presence of a claim for a filled prescription does not indicate that the medication was consumed or taken as prescribed. Patients included in the study are not necessarily representative of all patients being treated for osteoporosis.

Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy

Background

Adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is poor, and linked with patient perceptions of the benefits of, and barriers to taking these treatments. To better understand the association between patient perceptions and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, we generated thirteen items that may tap into patient perceptions about the benefits of, and barriers to osteoporosis treatment; and included these items as part of a standardized telephone interview of women aged 65–90 years (n = 871). The purpose of this paper is to report the psychometric evaluation of our scale.

Findings

Upon detailed analysis, six of the thirteen items were omitted: four redundant, one did not correlate well with any other item and one factorial complex. From the remaining seven items, two distinct unidimensional domains emerged (variance explained = 78%). Internal consistency of the 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits domain was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and was supported by construct validity; women reporting a physician-diagnosis or taking osteoporosis pharmacotherapy had higher osteoporosis treatment benefit scores compared to those reporting no osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment respectively. Because only two items were identified as tapping into treatment barriers, we recommend they each be used as a separate item assessing potential barriers to adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, rather than combined into a single scale.

Conclusion

The 5-item osteoporosis drug treatment benefits scale may be useful to examine perceptions about the benefits of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Further research is needed to develop scales that adequately measure perceived barriers to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe

Fragility fractures associated with osteoporosis constitute a significant public health concern. Clinical trials have shown that a variety of agents--bisphosphonates, raloxifene, calcitonin, hormone replacement therapy, teriparatide, and strontium ranelate--can reduce the risk of osteoporosis-related fragility fractures. However, low levels of compliance and persistence in the real-life setting mean that efficacy benefits observed in clinical trials with these agents may not translate into equivalent effectiveness in daily practice. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of compliance and persistence data from retrospective/observational studies, with particular reference to studies that consider the effects on fracture rates. PubMed of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Web of Science databases were searched for publications detailing observational or retrospective analyses of adherence, compliance, and persistence with osteoporosis therapies. In addition, authors provided relevant studies that were not retrieved using the search criteria. In total, 17 unique publications were identified. Analysis of the publications indicated that low compliance and persistence rates for osteoporosis therapies in the real-life setting result in increased rates of fragility fractures. The results emphasize the importance of good treatment compliance and persistence with osteoporosis therapies in order to achieve a significant therapeutic benefit and thereby reduce the burden that osteoporosis and associated fractures place on individuals and healthcare systems.

[Patient education in rheumatologic care--a review]

Patient education is a medical intervention for patients with chronic diseases to increase knowledge of their disease, self-efficacy, self-management and consumer behaviour. The goal is to improve their disease outcome, social participation and quality of life. This article reviews concepts, modalities and knowledge on effectiveness of patient education. The results of different studies in different rheumatic diseases on efficacy will be summarized including a small number of cost-benefit analyses. Most studies report on significant and relevant improvements of knowledge, self-efficacy and health status. With respect to disease specific outcomes low to moderate effect sizes with a short duration have been observed. Especially good results have been reported when physical training or other methods of rehabilitation were included. There are marked improvements in consumer behaviour of health measures and sickness leave. A better understanding of information needs and baseline characteristics of patients is necessary to develop more appropriate educational interventions focussed on relevant outcomes that can be improved by educational measures.

Adherence to alendronate in male veterans

In one Veterans Affairs' medical center, alendronate non-adherence was more likely in male veterans who smoke or report side effects, and less likely in men undergoing bone densitometry during therapy. Providers urgently need programs to increase adherence to osteoporosis medications. Initial programs should target patients with risk factors for non-adherence.

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to osteoporosis therapy in men is unknown. We hypothesized that ca. 50% of men at one center would be adherent to alendronate and one or more patient-specific factors would associate with adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review study of male veterans to determine the rates and predictors of alendronate adherence over two years. We excluded women, men who received primary care elsewhere and those who took alendronate for indications other than low bone mass. We defined adherence as a medication possession ratio > or =80% in the first 24 months of therapy.

RESULTS

Adherence in the first 12 and 24 months of therapy was 59% and 54%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, non-adherence was more likely in men using tobacco (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.13, 3.84, p = 0.02) and reporting side effects (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.14, 3.73, p = 0.02) and less likely in men undergoing bone density during therapy (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26, 0.90, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate non-adherence is more likely in male veterans who smoke or report side effects, and less likely in men having bone densitometry during therapy. Providers urgently need programs to increase adherence to osteoporosis medications. Initial programs should target patients with risk factors for non-adherence.

Persistence with bisphosphonate therapy including treatment courses with multiple sequential bisphosphonates in the real world

The real cumulative persistence probabilities with bisphosphonates after 5 years was 51.7%. Prescriptions by specialists other than gynecologists and rheumatologists (p < 0.001), male sex (p < 0.001), older age (> or =65 years) (p = 0.001), and cyclical etidronate (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with low persistence. Success rates of switching bisphosphonate were 75.6%.

INTRODUCTION

Many patients discontinue daily bisphosphonate therapy prematurely due to the stringent dosing procedures and adverse events. Consequently, some patients are receiving two or more sequential bisphosphonates in daily practice. Our objective was to study factors associated with the real cumulative persistence with bisphosphonate therapy including treatment courses with multiple sequential drugs in the real world setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1,307 patients (male 197, female 1110) newly prescribed with bisphosphonates between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2005.

RESULTS

The real cumulative persistence probabilities with bisphosphonates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 74.8%, 60.6%, and 51.7%, respectively. Switching of bisphosphonates was observed 168 times in 146 patients. Adverse events occurred 126 times in 124 patients including 86 events with gastrointestinal complaints. Univariate analysis showed that prescriptions by specialists other than gynecologists and rheumatologists (p < 0.001), male sex (p < 0.001), older age (> or =65 years) (p = 0.001), and cyclical etidronate (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with low persistence. Success rates of switching bisphosphonate were 75.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching of bisphosphonates was not uncommon. Despite switching bisphosphonates to improve persistence, the real cumulative persistence with bisphosphonate was suboptimal, especially among patients of certain physician specialties and male sex.

Osteoporosis and depression: a historical perspective

In the early 1980s, researchers studying osteoporosis noted that depression was one of the major negative consequences of bone loss and fractures. These researchers believed that osteoporosis and fractures occurred first, causing a reactive depression. Meanwhile, a similar but distinct psychiatry literature noted that osteoporosis or bone loss appeared to be an undesirable consequence of major depression. Here, depression was seen as the causal factor, and osteoporosis was the outcome. The psychiatric perspective is more biological, based on the presence of hypercorticoidism in depressed individuals. Those who believe that osteoporosis leads to depression point out that depression is a consequence of many chronic illnesses. Regardless of the correct causal order, the strong positive relationship between osteoporosis and depression merits further clinical and research attention in the future.

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of osteoporosis

Fractures that occur as a result of osteoporosis are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. A treatment regimen consisting of both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions can be used to decrease the risk of fracture. Nonpharmacologic interventions include calcium and vitamin D supplementation, weight-bearing exercise, muscle strengthening, and fall prevention. Pharmacologic options include: the bisphosphonates, estrogen therapy, raloxifene, salmon calcitonin, and the anabolic agent teriparatide. Although bone mineral density is used clinically to diagnose osteoporosis, it is of limited value when evaluating pharmacologic treatment; the primary indicator of treatment efficacy is fracture risk reduction. The bisphosphonates are the preferred therapy for osteoporosis. Studies have demonstrated that in postmenopausal women, both risedronate and alendronate are associated with reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk. The newest approved bisphosphonate, ibandronate, reduces vertebral fracture risk. Studies also support a reduction in fracture risk when alendronate and risedronate are used in men with osteoporosis and patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. When used appropriately, the bisphosphonates are well tolerated. Estrogen and raloxifene decrease fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis but are associated with thromboembolic events. Use of estrogen therapy is also limited by concerns about the safety of this type of therapy. Although the anabolic agent teriparatide is associated with reductions in vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, its use has been limited by the necessity of subcutaneous administration and its cost relative to other agents. Regardless of which treatment regimen is selected, health care providers need to emphasize the importance of compliance and adherence to improve persistence with therapy, and subsequent fracture reduction efficacy.