Acute pulmonary emboli in a patient on long-term dabigatran therapy

Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?

Anticoagulants are potent therapeutics widely used in medical and surgical settings, and the amount spent on anticoagulation is rising. Although warfarin remains a widely prescribed oral anticoagulant, prescriptions of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have increased rapidly. Heparin-based parenteral anticoagulants include both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). In clinical practice, anticoagulants are generally well tolerated, although interindividual variability in response is apparent. This variability in anticoagulant response can lead to serious incident thrombosis, haemorrhage and off-target adverse reactions such as heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT). This review seeks to highlight the genetic, environmental and clinical factors associated with variability in anticoagulant response, and review the current evidence base for tailoring the drug, dose, and/or monitoring decisions to identified patient subgroups to improve anticoagulant safety. Areas that would benefit from further research are also identified. Validated variants in VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 constitute biomarkers for differential warfarin response and genotype-informed warfarin dosing has been shown to reduce adverse clinical events. Polymorphisms in CES1 appear relevant to dabigatran exposure but the genetic studies focusing on clinical outcomes such as bleeding are sparse. The influence of body weight on LMWH response merits further attention, as does the relationship between anti-Xa levels and clinical outcomes. Ultimately, safe and effective anticoagulation requires both a deeper parsing of factors contributing to variable response, and further prospective studies to determine optimal therapeutic strategies in identified higher risk subgroups.

Rivaroxaban Pharmacokinetics in Obese Subjects: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The direct oral anticoagulants, including rivaroxaban, are relatively novel therapeutic options in the treatment and prevention of VTE. There is a conflicting and inconclusive evidence surrounding the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban in patients with VTE who are obese.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review to provide an overview, and to synthesize the available evidence in the current literature pertaining to rivaroxaban PK in obese subjects who are healthy or diseased.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Rayyan, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from 1 May 2021 through 28 February 2022. Studies investigating rivaroxaban PK in adult obese subjects were included in the review. Pertinent data, including anthropometric parameters, rivaroxaban dosage regimen, PK parameters, PK model, and outcome measures were extracted. Reference values of rivaroxaban PK parameters in the general population were used for comparison purposes. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020177770).

RESULTS

In the 11 studies included in this systematic review, over 7140 healthy or diseased subjects received rivaroxaban therapy, with varying clinical indications in the diseased population. The reported PK parameters of rivaroxaban in obese subjects compared with reference values in the general population were variable. The reported values of the volume of distribution (V_d) among obese subjects (73.4-82.8 L) fell within the range of values reported/calculated for the general population (59.4-104 L), assuming complete bioavailability. However, some of the reported values of clearance (CL) in obese subjects (7.86-16.8 L.h^-1) do not fall within the range of values reported/calculated for the general population (5.57-11.3 L.h^-1). The reported maximum plasma concentrations in obese subjects versus the general population following a 10 mg dose were 149 vs. 143-180 µg.L^-1, and following a 20 mg dose were 214-305 vs. 299-360 µg.L^-1, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) over different intervals in obese subjects versus the general population following a 10 mg dose were 1155 (AUC from time zero to infinity [AUC_∞]) vs. 1029 (AUC_∞) µg.h.L^-1; and 1204-2800 (AUC from time zero to 24 h [AUC₂₄]) vs. 3200 (AUC₂₄) µg.h.L^-1, respectively, following a 20 mg dose. The reported values of half-life and time to reach the maximum plasma concentration in obese subjects versus the general population were not consistent across studies.

CONCLUSION

Variable changes and inconsistencies in different rivaroxaban PK parameters were reported in obese subjects. Further well-designed studies are warranted to better characterize the PK and clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban in subjects with obesity.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Obesity: An Updated Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

To review literature on the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high body weight (BW) and/or high body mass index (BMI) and to make recommendations regarding use in this patient population.

DATA SOURCES

A search using PubMed was conducted (inception to April 13, 2020) using the term DOAC AND the terms obesity OR body weight. A separate search was also conducted with individual DOACs (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) and the aforementioned terms.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies included examined the effect of BW and/or BMI on DOAC pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety. Included studies had DOAC indications of prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, or treatment or long-term prevention of venous thromboembolism.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with high BW/BMI has not yet been elucidated by randomized trials; however, 2016 international guidelines suggest avoiding their use in patients with a BW >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m². Since 2016, several studies have been published examining use of DOACs in this patient population.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review thoroughly discusses the literature on DOACs in patients with a BW >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m² pre-2016 and post-2016 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates that each DOAC may have differences in outcomes when used in patients with a high BW/BMI. Currently, low-quality data are available that support avoiding dabigatran and considering apixaban or rivaroxaban; lack of sufficient data preclude a recommendation for edoxaban use in this patient population.

Evaluation of the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in comparison to warfarin in morbidly obese patients

Purpose: There is limited clinical data evaluating anticoagulation with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese patients. We sought to examine the efficacy in preventing stroke or other systemic embolic events and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, in comparison to warfarin in patients with either a body-mass index (BMI) over 40 kg/m2 and/or a weight over 120 kg.Methods: After approval from IRB, we collected retrospective data from our institution's records on 180 patients. We analyzed the rates of stroke and systemic embolic events as defined as ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and myocardial infarction (MI) as well as major bleeding in morbidly obese patients receiving apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in comparison to warfarin for anticoagulation due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, postoperative thrombus prophylaxis, or DVT/PE treatment and/or reduction in risk for recurrence.Results: The final analysis included 90 patients in both arms. Fifty-two percent (n = 41) of patients in the DOAC group were on apixaban therapy, 12% (n = 11) on dabigatran, and 37% (n = 33) on rivaroxaban. The average BMI and weight in the DOAC group were 46.7 kg/m2 and 139.3 kg, respectively. In the warfarin group, average BMI and weight were 45.8 kg/m2 and 135.9 kg, respectively. There were 11 patients who developed a stroke or thromboembolic event in the DOAC group and 10 in the warfarin group (OR 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-2.78; p = 0.82). The events in the DOAC group consisted of three patients who developed ischemic stroke, three patients who developed DVTs, one who developed a PE, and four patients who developed MIs. There were two major bleeding events in the DOAC group and three events in the warfarin group (p = 0.65).Conclusions: Anticoagulation therapy with DOACs in morbidly obese patients may be a safe and effective alternative to warfarin for prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events. However, additional studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Anticoagulation at the extremes of body weight: choices and dosing

INTRODUCTION

The landscape of therapeutic anticoagulation has changed dramatically over the past decade, with availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. However, the optimal anticoagulant agent and dosing strategy for patients at both extremes of body weight has not been established for any anticoagulant, including DOACs, vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and the various heparin options. Areas covered: This paper reviews available evidence to assist clinicians in prescribing of anticoagulation therapy at the extremes of body weight. Expert commentary: There are limited data to guide prescribing of all available anticoagulants at the extremes of weight and further research regarding efficacy and safety outcomes in these groups is required. Laboratory monitoring to guide dosing of traditional anticoagulants provides reassurance of 'predictable' efficacy. In contrast agents that are not routinely monitored by laboratory testing provide greater challenges. For example, underweight patients are at risk of receiving higher drug exposures of DOACs, whereas the use of fixed dose DOACs in obese patients may be associated with lower drug exposures.

A review of the fixed dose use of new oral anticoagulants in obese patients: Is it really enough?

Obesity is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and it is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. Altered pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of drugs in obese patients require dose adjustment according to body weight. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are more frequently used for anticoagulation, are recommended to be used at a fixed dose based on data derived from phase 2 and 3 studies. However, the representation of obese patients [>100 kg or a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m²] in subgroups with a small sample size and reports of various emboli cases under drug treatment have raised suspicions about the adequacy of fixed dose use. To address this issue, we analyzed several patients with a body weight of >100 kg or BMI of >30 kg/m² participating in NOAC studies and evaluated whether these numbers were sufficient to enable an accurate recommendation of fixed dose use in obese patients.

Management of rivaroxaban in relation to bodyweight and body mass index

Being overweight or obese is associated with a higher individual risk of venous thromboembolism and poorer postprocedural outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery. In addition, there is evidence that obesity represents a significant driving factor for the current and projected prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban and other direct oral anticoagulants offer fixed-dose regimens for these indications. They do not require therapeutic drug monitoring or dose adjustment according to the weight of the patient. However, primary care physicians seem to be hesitant to accept the concept of a fixed-dose regimen for patients at extremes of weight, perhaps because of familiarity with weight-based dosing of other drugs including low molecular weight heparins. The main concerns related to unadjusted dosing are increased exposure in underweight patients leading to a risk of excessive bleeding and conversely to underanticoagulation of overweight patients. Rivaroxaban has shown similar efficacy and a similar or better safety profile compared with standard treatment for several venous and arterial indications, including venous thromboembolism, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and acute coronary syndrome. Prespecified subgroup analyses of patients stratified by weight or body mass index demonstrated outcomes that were consistent with the overall analysis and within each weight and body mass index group. The results suggest that standard-dose rivaroxaban can be safely prescribed in adult patients of all weights.