Transform Health Arkansas: A Transgender-Led Partnership Engaging Transgender/Non-Binary Arkansans in Defining Health Research Priorities

Diagnosing, managing, and studying long-COVID syndromes in children and adolescents in rural and underserved populations

The COVID-19 pandemic has arguably had its greatest impact in rural and other historically hard-to-reach populations. Families in rural and underserved communities experienced COVID-19 infections at a higher rate than did their peers in other groups and experienced disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Without careful design and implementation of resources, children in these areas are also at risk of being disproportionately affected by long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infections, such as "long COVID" syndromes. Increased frequency and severity of COVID-19 infections, decreased access to health care and supporting services, environmental and social structure factors that exacerbate post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, and increased baseline frequency of health disorders that may complicate post-COVID issues, such as higher rates of obesity, asthma, diabetes, and mental health disorders, all place children and adolescents in under-resourced areas at significant risk. Unfortunately, children and adolescents in these areas have been historically under-represented in clinical research. Not only are fewer studies published with participants in rural and underserved communities, but these studies more often exhibit lower quality, with fewer randomized controlled trials and multicenter studies. This gap not only deprives people in rural and underserved areas of the country of access to cutting-edge therapy, but it also risks "evidence-based" solutions that are not generalizable because they cannot be implemented in the areas disproportionately affected by many health conditions such as long COVID. These factors significantly impede our ability to provide appropriate medical care for underserved communities. This review will discuss the impact of COVID-19 in rural and underserved communities and the factors that must be considered in designing evidence-based long-COVID solutions for children and adolescents in these areas.

Common Patterns of Cisgender Use in Public Health Articles and Their Implications for Gender Inclusivity Efforts, 2013‒2020

Objectives. To identify how "cisgender" has been used in public health articles in recent years relative to the historical origins of the term to mark normative gender and describe systems of social power. Methods. I analyzed 352 US-focused public health articles (2013-2020) using a summative content analysis approach. I traced cisgender use by year and compared it by sample population (cisgender-only, mixed, not cisgender). Results. I identified 4 interlocking and mutually reinforcing patterns of cisgender use: limited and narrow use, undertheorized use, use as the default gender, and reinforcing binary categorization. These patterns largely result from the narrowing of cisgender to a demographic label. Conclusions. Cisgender is primarily used to categorize individual research participants as not transgender rather than to reflect participants' actual identity and experiences within gendered systems of power, which undermines cisgender's potential to support gender-inclusivity efforts and deepen understandings of gender-based health disparities. Public Health Implications. Two paths for creating more robust use of cisgender are (1) supporting gender inclusivity by clarifying and standardizing how and when the demographic category is used and (2) expanding the analytic potential of cisgender by returning to its historical origins as a framework for exposing and explaining patterns of power. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(2):202-208. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307441).

Facilitators and barriers to providing affirming care for transgender patients in primary care practices in Arkansas

PURPOSE

This study assessed factors affecting the provision of affirming-care best practices (ACBPs) for transgender individuals by primary care providers (PCPs) in a rural, southern state METHODS: We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in 2020, including a statewide survey (phase 1) and interviews (phase 2). Surveyed PCPs (phase 1) included Medical Doctors/Doctors of Osteopathy (MDs/DOs), nurse practitioners, and 1 physician assistant. Interview participants (phase 2) included providers and staff in 6 practices throughout the state. We used an exploratory approach to data collection and performed content analysis to classify interview data into categories representing overarching themes RESULTS: Among surveyed PCPs who reported they had provided care to transgender patients (n = 35), the most common reason for providing gender-affirming medical services was "because of my ethical obligation to treat patients equally" (n = 27, 77%). The most common reason for not providing such services was because the PCPs "have not been trained/don't feel competent to provide these services" (n = 12, 34%). Interviews revealed the following themes: (1) willingness to provide "culturally competent care"; (2) continuum of accepting to affirming attitudes toward transgender individuals; (3) basic understanding of stigma and an awareness of its impact; (4) changes needed to provide "culturally competent care"; and (5) preferred clinical support strategies.

CONCLUSION

Training and education to provide ACBPs are warranted and would meet the needs of patients and providers. Facilitating telemedicine visits for transgender patients with gender-affirming care experts was a favorable implementation strategy for clinical support and is recommended to address access to affirming care.

A Systematic Literature Review of Community-Based Participatory Health Research with Sexual and Gender Minority Communities

Purpose:

The objective was to review sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research studies to gain an understanding of how the community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework has been operationalized.

Methods:

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct a review of all SGM health research studies published in the past 10 years that cited a CBPR approach (PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42016036608). CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched in October 2020. Dimensions of community involvement (e.g., shared decision-making; flexibility to community needs and priorities) and the strength of evidence for each dimension were rated using guidance from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality.

Results:

The 48 eligible articles identified reported a range of 0–11 (out of 13) community elements. Seven studies reported zero elements. Qualitative studies (n=28; 58.3%) had an average quality score of 2.32 (range: 1.43–2.5). The 15 (31.3%) cross-sectional studies had an average quality score of 2.08 (range: 1.64–2.27).

Conclusion:

Adhering to the CBPR framework is challenging. The benefits of striving toward its principles, however, can move us toward transformative and sustainable social change within SGM communities.

Setting a research agenda in trans health: An expert assessment of priorities and issues by trans and nonbinary researchers

Background

This article is by a group of trans and nonbinary researchers and experts in the field of trans health who have conducted an analysis of trans health research needs.

Aims

To highlight topics that need further research and to outline key considerations for those conducting research in our field.

Methods

The first author conducted semi-structured interviews with all coauthors, and these were used to create a first draft of this manuscript. This draft was circulated to all authors, with edits made until consensus was reached among the authors.

Results

More comprehensive long-term research that centers trans people's experiences is needed on the risks and benefits of gender affirming hormones and surgeries. The trans health research field also needs to have a broader focus beyond medical transition or gender affirmation, including general health and routine healthcare; trans people's lives without, before, and after medical gender affirmation; and sexuality, fertility, and reproductive healthcare needs. More research is also needed on social determinants of health, including ways to make healthcare settings and other environments safer and more supportive; social and legal gender recognition; the needs of trans people who are most marginalized; and the ways in which healing happens within trans communities. The second part of this article highlights key considerations for researchers, the foremost being acknowledging trans community expertise and centering trans community members' input into research design and interpretation of findings, in advisory and/or researcher roles. Ethical considerations include maximizing benefits and minimizing harms (beneficence) and transparency and accountability to trans communities. Finally, we note the importance of conferences, grant funding, working with students, and multidisciplinary teams.

Discussion

This article outlines topics and issues needing further consideration to make the field of trans health research more responsive to the needs of trans people. This work is limited by our authorship group being mostly White, all being Anglophone, and residing in the Global North.

Experiences of Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Patients in the Emergency Department and Recommendations for Health Care Policy, Education, and Practice

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender nonbinary (trans/NB) individuals face many barriers to accessing health care in the United States due to systemic and clinician discrimination. Such experiences can lead to avoidance or delays in seeking care. These issues are relevant for emergency department (ED) clinicians and staff because trans/NB patients may use the ED in times of crisis.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore experiences of trans/NB individuals accessing health care in the ED and provide recommendations for improvements.

METHODS

This study involved semi-structured qualitative interviews with nine trans/NB individuals living in Arkansas about their experiences when visiting local EDs.

RESULTS

Interviews revealed four main themes: 1) system and structural issues; 2) interactions with clinicians/staff influence care received; 3) perceptions of clinician knowledge and education about trans/NB health; and 4) impact on future health and health care access. Participants recommended education for current and future ED clinicians and staff to improve knowledge of best practices for trans/NB health care. Recommendations were also made to improve ED policy for inclusive and affirming intake processes, intake forms, and electronic health record (EHR) documentation, including documentation and use of patients' chosen name and pronouns.

CONCLUSION

The negative experiences and discrimination reported by trans/NB patients in ED visits underscores the importance of improving ED clinician knowledge of gender-affirming care practices, ED intake policies and practices, and EHR documentation in EDs.

Patient-centered practices for engaging transgender and gender diverse patients in clinical research studies

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this formative study was to assess barriers and facilitators to participation of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients in clinical research to solicit specific feedback on perceived acceptability and feasibility of research methods to inform creation of a multisite longitudinal cohort of primary care patients engaged in care at two community health centers.

METHOD

Between September-November 2018, four focus groups (FGs) were convened at two community health centers in Boston, MA and New York, NY (N = 28 participants across all 4 groups; 11 in Boston and 17 in New York). FG guides asked about patient outreach, acceptability of study methods and measures, and ideas for study retention. FGs were facilitated by TGD study staff, lasted approximately 90 min in duration, were audio recorded, and then transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. Thematic analyses were conducted by two independent analysts applying a constant comparison method. Consistency and consensus were achieved across code creation and application aided by Dedoose software.

RESULTS

Participants were a mean age of 33.9 years (SD 12.3; Range 18-66). Participants varied in gender identity with 4 (14.3%) men, 3 (10.7%) women, 8 (28.6%) transgender men, 10 (35.7%) transgender women, and 3 (10.7%) nonbinary. Eight (26.6%) were Latinx, 5 (17.9%) Black, 3 (10.7%) Asian, 3 (10.7%) another race, and 5 (17.9%) multiracial. Motivators and facilitators to participation were: research creating community, research led by TGD staff, compensation, research integrated into healthcare, research applicable to TGD and non-TGD people, and research helping TGD communities. Barriers were: being research/healthcare averse, not identifying as TGD, overlooking questioning individuals, research coming from a 'cisgender lens", distrust of how the research will be used, research not being accessible to TGD people, and research being exploitative.

CONCLUSION

Though similarities emerged between the perspectives of TGD people and research citing perspectives of other underserved populations, there are barriers and facilitators to research which are unique to TGD populations. It is important for TGD people to be involved as collaborators in all aspects of research that concerns them.

Transgender-Competent Health Care: Lessons from the Community

OBJECTIVES

Transgender (trans) individuals experience high discrimination levels when accessing medical and mental health care, resulting in poorer health outcomes compared with the general population and other minority populations. A community-based research design was used to elicit direct input from the trans community about critical trans-knowledgeable care components to address these disparities. The data collection included several focus groups with individuals recruited from the trans community. The information from this research guided the opening of the Gender Center, a centralized, multidisciplinary center of care for trans individuals within an urban safety-net hospital in Atlanta, Georgia.

METHODS

The research team conducted five focus groups with 27 self-identified trans individuals between December 2016 and April 2017. Focus groups solicited the negative and positive experiences of trans individuals in the healthcare system and sought input about how best to serve this population.

RESULTS

Analysis was done January through April 2020. Focus group participants identified financial difficulties, lack of insurance coverage, being underinsured, discrimination within the healthcare system and from providers, and a shortage of trans-competent providers as the most significant barriers to care. Participants emphasized the need to pay attention to creating a welcoming clinic environment, including trans-positive signage, and integrating trans staff members into the care team.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the importance of community-based research in addressing health disparities for trans people. It also offers insight into the unmet healthcare needs of the trans community, describes typical healthcare-related experiences of trans individuals, and identifies critical elements for providing high-quality trans-appropriate health care.

A review of top performing rural community and critical access hospitals' web resources for transgender patients in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of "LGBT" and "transgender" terminology and type of resources available to transgender patients on the websites of top performing rural/community hospitals and critical access hospitals in the U.S. The effect of hospital control (e.g. type of operating parent organization) on the presence of transgender resources on these websites was also evaluated.

METHODS

The rural and critical access hospitals selected for inclusion in this study were those published on the Chartis Group's 2020 "top performing" hospital lists. Each hospital website was reviewed for the presence of "transgender" and "LGBT" terminology, as well several control terms commonly found on hospital websites.

RESULTS

Findings suggest a lack of resources for sexual and gender minorities among rural community and critical access hospitals within this sample; the term "transgender" appeared on 26% of rural community hospitals and 21% of critical access hospitals (N = 200). There was no significant relationship between hospital classification and the type of transgender resources offered by the hospitals (p = 0.248). There was a significant relationship between hospital control and presence of the term "transgender" on the websites of critical access hospitals (p = 0.002, Fisher's Exact Test).

CONCLUSIONS

Few facilities provided links to external resources for transgender patients, advertised LGBT-friendly providers, or provided any information pertaining to gender-affirming healthcare. Additional research is needed to determine what barriers or social forces prevent these hospitals from using their websites to create a more inclusive environment for transgender patients within the communities they serve.

Community-Engaged Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Education Workshop on Gender-Affirming Care

Background: Transgender/nonbinary (trans/NB) patients face stigma in health care settings. Health care professionals' training on trans/NB issues has historically been lacking. Interprofessional education (IPE) provides an opportunity to improve knowledge and attitudes across health care professions. The purpose of this study was to: (a) describe the development and implementation of an IPE workshop on gender-affirming care through a trans/NB community-academic partnership and (b) examine the impact of the workshop on student knowledge and attitudes. Methods: The workshop included a slide presentation on basic terminology and concepts, video clips of trans/NB patient-provider interactions, facilitated discussions of affirming practices, and a trans/NB panel. Nonparametric statistical analysis of pre- and post-survey data from 58 workshop participants measured changes in student knowledge and attitudes. Findings: Students demonstrated statistically significant improvements in knowledge (t=-12.72; p<0.01) and interpersonal comfort (t=-2.06; p<0.05) as well as sex and gender beliefs (t=-3.06; p<0.05) on subscales from the Transgender Attitudes & Beliefs Scale. The results demonstrated no differences on the human value subscale (t=-0.69; p=0.49) or on health care professional questions (t=-1.23; p=0.23). Conclusions: A community-academic partnership developed and implemented this brief interactive educational intervention, which can improve both knowledge and attitudes about trans/NB individuals' health among health professional students.

Highest Priority Health and Health Care Concerns of Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals in a Southern State

Purpose: Transgender (trans) and nonbinary (NB) individuals experience a number of health and health care disparities when compared with cisgender individuals. While this has been reflected in nationwide surveys of trans/NB people in the United States, few studies capture the unique experiences of trans people living in the South, and fewer studies have collected qualitative data directly from trans/NB people. The purpose of this trans/NB-led initiative was to engage the trans/NB community in a southern state in defining their most pressing health and health care concerns and comparing those results with those reported by their cisgender allies, as well as national samples of trans individuals. Methods: Participants (n=125), who were trans/NB individuals (77%) and their cisgender allies (23%) living in a southern state, completed a survey with open-ended response options and/or participated in trans-led summits. Results: The top three health and health care concerns identified by participants, both trans/NB and cisgender allies, were insurance coverage for transition-related care, access to and availability of transition-related care, and education of health care providers about trans patients and issues. Conclusions: The top concerns from trans/NB participants and cisgender allies reflect health and health care issues frequently reported by the trans/NB community nationwide. Having qualitative data from trans/NB individuals and their allies living in the South enhances our understanding of these commonly reported concerns. Future research, education, and health care practice initiatives should focus on the concerns identified by the trans/NB community.