1
|
Ebina K, Etani Y, Noguchi T, Nakata K, Okada S. Clinical effects of teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 2024:10.1007/s00774-024-01536-0. [PMID: 39009890 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01536-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
In the management of osteoporosis, anti-resorptive agents serve as a primary therapeutic approach. However, in cases where individuals exhibit an increased susceptibility to fractures, such as those characterized by severe low bone mass or a history of vertebral or hip fractures that markedly diminish life expectancy, the immediate reduction of fracture risk through the administration of osteoanabolic agents could be beneficial. Teriparatide, available in daily, once-weekly, or twice-weekly dosages, along with abaloparatide and romosozumab, constitutes a trio of such agents. Each of these medications is defined by unique characteristics, distinct efficacy profiles, and specific adverse effects. There is growing evidence to suggest that these agents have a superior effect on enhancing bone mineral density and reducing fracture incidence when compared to traditional bisphosphonate therapies. Nonetheless, their employment demands thorough consideration of clinical indications, which includes evaluating economic factors, the frequency of injections required, and the potential for adverse effects. The objective of this review is to consolidate the current evidence focusing primarily on the efficacy of these agents, with the goal of enhancing understanding and aiding in making more informed treatment decisions, particularly for those individuals who are at an elevated risk of fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Ebina
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
- Department of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yuki Etani
- Department of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takaaki Noguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Ken Nakata
- Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Seiji Okada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gielen E, Aldvén M, Kanis JA, Borgström F, Senior E, Willems D. Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Belgium. Osteoporos Int 2024; 35:1173-1183. [PMID: 38565690 PMCID: PMC11211114 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07043-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide-to-alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate for osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture in Belgium. PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide followed by alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture, from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab is reimbursed in Belgium since December 2021. METHODS A Markov microsimulation model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and to teriparatide-to-alendronate over a lifetime horizon. Patients transition between five different health states every 6 months based on fracture risks or death. The model was populated with Belgium-specific epidemiological and cost data, where available. The fracture risk reduction of romosozumab treatment was collated from the ARCH study, and from a published network meta-analysis. Costs were included from a healthcare perspective (NIHDI). Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), reported in Euro (€) 2022. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS Romosozumab-to-alendronate was associated with 0.12 additional QALYs at an additional cost of €2314 compared to alendronate monotherapy, resulting in an ICER of €19,978. Compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate, romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be dominant, with higher QALYs and lower costs. The base-case results were robust to uncertainty in the input parameters when conducting the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION Sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide followed by alendronate for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Gielen
- Department of Geriatrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Geriatrics & Gerontology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | | | - John A Kanis
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Mary MacKillop Health Institute, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam F, Alsaed O, Abdulla N, Abdulmomen I, Lutf A, Al Emadi S. Guidelines for fracture risk assessment and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50 in Qatar. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:34. [PMID: 38698101 PMCID: PMC11065783 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01389-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
We present comprehensive guidelines for osteoporosis management in Qatar. Formulated by the Qatar Osteoporosis Association, the guidelines recommend the age-dependent Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening, emphasizing risk-based treatment strategies and discouraging routine dual-energy X-ray scans. They offer a vital resource for physicians managing osteoporosis and fragility fractures nationwide. PURPOSE Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures are a growing public health issue with an impact on individuals and the healthcare system. We aimed to present guidelines providing unified guidance to all healthcare professionals in Qatar regarding the management of osteoporosis. METHODS The Qatar Osteoporosis Association formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50. A panel of six local rheumatologists who are experts in the field of osteoporosis met together and conducted an extensive review of published articles and local and international guidelines to formulate guidance for the screening and management of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years in Qatar. RESULTS The guidelines emphasize the use of the age-dependent hybrid model of the Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening osteoporosis and risk categorization. The guidelines include screening, risk stratification, investigations, treatment, and monitoring of patients with osteoporosis. The use of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan without any risk factors is discouraged. Treatment options are recommended based on risk stratification. CONCLUSION Guidance is provided to all physicians across the country who are involved in the care of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiaz Alam
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Omar Alsaed
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nabeel Abdulla
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ibrahim Abdulmomen
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Abdo Lutf
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Samar Al Emadi
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cosman F, Langdahl B, Leder BZ. Treatment Sequence for Osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 2024; 30:490-496. [PMID: 38311211 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is a chronic progressive disease that requires lifelong monitoring and treatment. Sequencing from one treatment to another at different ages and stages of disease is an approach that can maximize benefits and avoid potential risks from long-term treatment with a single agent. OBJECTIVE This article reviews clinical trial data in postmenopausal women that evaluate the effects of antiresorptive agents followed by other antiresorptives, osteoanabolic agents followed by antiresorptives, and antiresorptives followed by osteoanabolic medications. METHODS Literature review and discussion. RESULTS When medications are discontinued, in the absence of sequential therapy, bone turnover rates return to baseline or above baseline, and bone loss occurs. The rate of bone loss differs for different treatments, with a very slow decline after stopping bisphosphonates and a particularly rapid decline after stopping denosumab. Careful attention to osteoporosis medication transitions can mitigate bone density loss and its consequences. For women who remain at high risk, switching from bisphosphonates to the more potent antiresorptive, denosumab, will result in further improvement in bone mineral density (BMD). When indicated, stopping denosumab can be accomplished safely by transition to an adequate bisphosphonate regimen. For high- and very-high-risk patients, treating with osteoanabolic agents first, followed by antiresorptive agents, produces substantially larger BMD gains than the reverse treatment sequence, with the biggest differences seen for BMD of the hip. CONCLUSION Awareness of the importance of treatment sequences can help improve osteoporosis care across the postmenopausal lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Cosman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
| | - Bente Langdahl
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Benjamin Z Leder
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fassio A, Gatti D, Biffi A, Ronco R, Porcu G, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Cianferotti L, Frediani B, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Brandi ML, Corrao G, Tarantino U. The sequential antifracturative treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2024; 16:1759720X241234584. [PMID: 38654732 PMCID: PMC11036926 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x241234584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Subjects with a fragility fracture have an increased risk of a new fracture and should receive effective strategies to prevent new events. The medium-term to long-term strategy should be scheduled by considering the mechanisms of action in therapy and the estimated fracture risk. Objective A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the sequential strategy in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were investigated up to February 2021 to update the search of a recent systematic review. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the sequential therapy of antiresorptive, anabolic treatment, or placebo in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture were eligible. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias in the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using fixed-effects models. The primary outcome was the risk of refracture, while the secondary outcome was the bone mineral density (BMD) change. Results In all, 17 RCTs, ranging from low to high quality, met our inclusion criteria. A significantly reduced risk of fracture was detected at (i) 12 or 24 months after the switch from romosozumab to denosumab versus placebo to denosumab; (ii) 30 months from teriparatide to bisphosphonates versus placebo to bisphosphonates; and (iii) 12 months from romosozumab to alendronate versus the only alendronate therapy (specifically for vertebral fractures). In general, at 2 years after the switch from anabolic to antiresorptive drugs, a weighted BMD was increased at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck site. Conclusion The Task Force formulated recommendations on sequential therapy, which is the first treatment with anabolic drugs or 'bone builders' in patients with very high or imminent risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Fassio
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Piazzale A Scuro, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona 37134, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Achille P. Caputi
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Frediani
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione Nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell’Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Nicoletti
- Coordinamento Nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, ‘Policlinico Tor Vergata’ Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Giovanni Corrao
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano–Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, ‘Policlinico Tor Vergata’ Foundation, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramchand SK, Leder BZ. Sequential Therapy for the Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 109:303-311. [PMID: 37610985 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic condition characterized by decreased bone mass, loss of skeletal integrity, and increased susceptibility to fracture. Drugs used to treat osteoporosis can be classified as those that block bone resorption (antiresorptive), stimulate bone formation (anabolic), or do both. While all currently approved medications reduce the risk of fragility fractures in high-risk populations, they are generally unable to fully restore bone strength in most patients with established disease. Thus, the majority of patients require disease management over many years. Unfortunately, the continuous use of a single drug has limitations, both in terms of efficacy and safety, and so sequential therapy is commonly required. Given the expanding list of pharmacological agents currently available, careful consideration needs to be given as to which drugs to use and in what sequence. This review will evaluate the differential effects of antiresorptive, bone-forming, and dual-acting drugs when used in specific sequences and will explore the current evidence favoring the initial use of bone-forming/dual-acting drugs followed by antiresorptive medications. This review will also examine the notion that long-term treatment with an antiresorptive drug may diminish the efficacy of subsequent treatment with a bone-forming/dual-acting drug. Finally, this review will explore the current evidence pertaining to the specific issue of how to best prevent the clinical ramifications of denosumab cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabashini K Ramchand
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Benjamin Z Leder
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ye Z, Wang Y, Xiang B, Wang H, Tao H, Zhang C, Zhang S, Sun D, Luo F, Song L. Roles of the Siglec family in bone and bone homeostasis. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 165:115064. [PMID: 37413904 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Tremendous progress has been seen in the study of the role of sialic acid binding im-munoglobulin type lectins (Siglecs) in osteoimmunology in the past two decades. Interest in Siglecs as immune checkpoints has grown from the recognition that Siglecs have relevance to human disease. Siglecs play important roles in inflammation and cancer, and play key roles in immune cell signaling. By recognizing common sialic acid containing glycans on glycoproteins and glycolipids as regulatory receptors for immune cell signals, Siglecs are expressed on most immune cells and play important roles in normal homeostasis and self-tolerance. In this review, we describe the role that the siglec family plays in bone and bone homeostasis, including the regulation of osteoclast differentiation as well as recent advances in inflammation, cancer and osteoporosis. Particular emphasis is placed on the relevant functions of Siglecs in self-tolerance and as pattern recognition receptors in immune responses, thereby potentially providing emerging strategies for the treatment of bone related diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi Ye
- The Fourth Corps of Students of the Basic Medical College, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
| | - Yetong Wang
- The Fourth Corps of Students of the Basic Medical College, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
| | - Binqing Xiang
- Department of Surgical Anesthesia, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Heng Wang
- Army Border Defense 331st Brigade, Dandong 118000, China
| | - Haiyan Tao
- Health Management Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Chengmin Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Shuai Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Dong Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
| | - Fei Luo
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
| | - Lei Song
- Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ramchand SK, David NL, Lee H, Bruce M, Bouxsein ML, Tsai JN, Leder BZ. The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength after Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration: DATA-HD Study Extension. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38:26-34. [PMID: 36333954 PMCID: PMC10098948 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The combination of denosumab and teriparatide is an effective treatment strategy in postmenopausal osteoporosis, though skeletal gains are promptly lost when these agents are discontinued. In the DATA-HD study, we reported that a single dose of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintains the increases in areal spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) achieved with this combination for at least 12 months. The capacity of ZOL to maintain corresponding improvements in peripheral volumetric BMD and microarchitecture, however, has not been reported. In the 15-month DATA-HD study, 76 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive 9 months of teriparatide (20-μg or 40-μg daily) overlapped with denosumab (60 mg at months 3 and 9). In the Extension study, 53 participants received a single dose of ZOL (5 mg intravenously) 24-35 weeks after the last denosumab dose. We measured volumetric BMD and microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography at months 27 and 42. Despite ZOL administration, total and cortical BMD gradually decreased over 27 months resulting in values similar to baseline at the radius but still significantly above baseline at the tibia. At both sites, cortical porosity decreased to values below pretreatment baseline at month 27 but then increased from month 27 to 42. There were no significant changes in trabecular parameters throughout the 27-month post-ZOL observation period. Stiffness and failure load, at both sites, decreased progressively from month 15 42 though remained above baseline at the tibia. These findings suggest that in contrast to the largely maintained gains in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived spine and hip BMD, a single dose of ZOL was not as effective in maintaining the gains in volumetric peripheral bone density and microarchitecture produced by 15 months of overlapping treatment with denosumab and teriparatide. Alternative therapeutic approaches that can fully maintain improvements in peripheral bone parameters require further study. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabashini K Ramchand
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie L David
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hang Lee
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Bruce
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joy N Tsai
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Z Leder
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Cianferotti L, Frediani B, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Tarantino U, Brandi ML. Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1137671. [PMID: 37143730 PMCID: PMC10151776 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field. Purpose This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline. Methods The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations. Results Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione Nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell’Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Michieli
- Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care Società Italiana di Medicina Generale e delle cure primarie (SIMG), Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Nicoletti
- CnAMC, Coordinamento nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bandeira L, Lewiecki EM. Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis: update on efficacy and safety. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM 2022; 66:707-716. [PMID: 36382760 PMCID: PMC10118815 DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Anabolic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis increase bone density, improve bone strength, and reduce fracture risk. They are distinguished from antiresorptive drugs by their property of increasing osteoblastic bone formation. Teriparatide and abaloparatide are parathyroid hormone receptor agonists that increase bone remodeling with bone formation increasing more than bone resorption. Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to sclerostin that has a "dual effect" of increasing bone formation while decreasing bone resorption. The bone forming effects of anabolic therapy appear to be self-limited, making it imperative that it be followed by antiresorptive therapy to enhance or consolidate the beneficial effects achieved. Teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab each have unique pharmacological properties that must be appreciated when using them to treat patients at high risk for fracture. Clinical trials have shown a favorable balance of expected benefits and possible risks. Anabolic therapy is superior to bisphosphonates for high-risk patients, with greater benefit when initial treatment is with an anabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive drug, rather than the reverse sequence of therapy. Recent clinical practice guidelines have included recommendations with examples of patients who are candidates with anabolic therapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Curtis EM, Reginster JY, Al-Daghri N, Biver E, Brandi ML, Cavalier E, Hadji P, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Hiligsmann M, Javaid MK, Kanis JA, Kaufman JM, Lamy O, Matijevic R, Perez AD, Radermecker RP, Rosa MM, Thomas T, Thomasius F, Vlaskovska M, Rizzoli R, Cooper C. Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:695-714. [PMID: 35332506 PMCID: PMC9076733 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02100-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis care has evolved markedly over the last 50 years, such that there are now an established clinical definition, validated methods of fracture risk assessment and a range of effective pharmacological agents. Currently, bone-forming (anabolic) agents, in many countries, are used in those patients who have continued to lose bone mineral density (BMD), patients with multiple subsequent fractures or those who have fractured despite treatment with antiresorptive agents. However, head-to-head data suggest that anabolic agents have greater rapidity and efficacy for fracture risk reduction than do antiresorptive therapies. The European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) convened an expert working group to discuss the tools available to identify patients at high risk of fracture, review the evidence for the use of anabolic agents as the initial intervention in patients at highest risk of fracture and consider the sequence of therapy following their use. This position paper sets out the findings of the group and the consequent recommendations. The key conclusion is that the current evidence base supports an "anabolic first" approach in patients found to be at very high risk of fracture, followed by maintenance therapy using an antiresorptive agent, and with the subsequent need for antiosteoporosis therapy addressed over a lifetime horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman B23, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nasser Al-Daghri
- Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Emmanuel Biver
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- F.I.R.M.O, Italian Foundation for the Research on Bone Diseases, Florence, Italy
| | - Etienne Cavalier
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liege, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany
- Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean-Marc Kaufman
- Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Olivier Lamy
- University of Lausanne, UNIL, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Radmila Matijevic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Adolfo Diez Perez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona and CIBERFES, Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Régis Pierre Radermecker
- Department of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liege, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Thierry Thomas
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
- INSERM U1059, Université de Lyon, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Mila Vlaskovska
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - René Rizzoli
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsuda E, Fukuda C, Okada A, Karibe T, Hiruma Y, Takagi N, Isumi Y, Yamamoto T, Hasegawa T, Uehara S, Koide M, Udagawa N, Amizuka N, Kumakura S. Characterization, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of anti-Siglec-15 antibody and its potency for treating osteoporosis and as follow-up treatment after parathyroid hormone use. Bone 2022; 155:116241. [PMID: 34715394 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have established the idea that Siglec-15 is involved in osteoclast differentiation and/or function, and it is anticipated that therapies suppressing Siglec-15 function can be used to treat bone diseases such as osteoporosis. We have produced rat monoclonal anti-Siglec-15 antibody (32A1) and successively generated humanized monoclonal anti-Siglec-15 antibody (DS-1501a) from 32A1. Studies on the biological properties of DS-1501a showed its specific binding affinity to Siglec-15 and strong activity to inhibit osteoclastogenesis. 32A1 inhibited multinucleation of osteoclasts and bone resorption (pit formation) in cultured mouse bone marrow cells. 32A1 also inhibited pit formation in cultured human osteoclast precursor cells. Maximum serum concentration and serum exposure of DS-1501a in rats were increased in a dose-dependent manner after single subcutaneous or intravenous administration. Furthermore, single administration of DS-1501a significantly suppressed bone resorption markers with minimal effects on bone formation markers and suppressed the decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. In histological analysis, the osteoclasts distant from the chondro-osseous junction of the tibia tended to be flattened, shrunken, and functionally impaired in 32A1-treated rats, while alkaline phosphatase-positive osteoblasts were observed throughout the metaphyseal trabeculae. In addition, we compared the efficacy of 32A1 with that of alendronate (ALN) as follow-up medicine after treatment with parathyroid hormone (PTH) using mature established osteoporosis rats. The beneficial effect of PTH on bone turnover disappeared 8 weeks after discontinuing the treatment. The administration of 32A1 once every 4 weeks for 8 weeks suppressed bone resorption and bone formation when the treatment was switched from PTH to 32A1, leading to the maintenance of BMD and bone strength. Unlike with ALN, the onset of suppression of bone resorption with 32A1 was rapid, while the suppression of bone formation was mild. The improvement of bone mass, beneficial bone turnover balance, and suppression of osteoclast differentiation/multinucleation achieved by 32A1 were supported by histomorphometry. Notably, the effects of 32A1 on bone strength, not only structural (extrinsic) but also material (intrinsic) properties, were significantly greater than those of ALN. Since the effect of 32A1 on BMD was moderate, its effect on bone strength could not be fully explained by the increase in BMD. The beneficial balance of bone turnover caused by 32A1 might, at least in part, be responsible for the improvement in bone quality. This is the first report describing the effects of anti-Siglec-15 antibody in OVX rats; the findings suggest that this antibody could be an excellent candidate for treating osteoporosis, especially in continuation therapy after PTH treatment, due to its rapid action and unprecedented beneficial effects on bone quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eisuke Tsuda
- Specialty Medicine Research Laboratories I, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
| | - Chie Fukuda
- Specialty Medicine Research Laboratories I, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan.
| | - Akiko Okada
- Biological Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Karibe
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
| | - Yoshiharu Hiruma
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8426, Japan
| | - Nana Takagi
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 3-5-1 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8426, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Isumi
- Oncology Research Laboratories I, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
| | - Tomomaya Yamamoto
- Developmental Biology of Hard Tissue, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Nishi 7 Chome, Kita 13 Jo, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan
| | - Tomoka Hasegawa
- Developmental Biology of Hard Tissue, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Nishi 7 Chome, Kita 13 Jo, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Uehara
- Department of Oral Biochemistry, Matsumoto Dental University, 1780 Gobara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-0781, Japan
| | - Masanori Koide
- Division of Hard Tissue Research, Institute for Oral Science, Matsumoto Dental University, 1780 Gobara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-0781, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Udagawa
- Department of Oral Biochemistry, Matsumoto Dental University, 1780 Gobara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-0781, Japan; Division of Hard Tissue Research, Institute for Oral Science, Matsumoto Dental University, 1780 Gobara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-0781, Japan
| | - Norio Amizuka
- Developmental Biology of Hard Tissue, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Nishi 7 Chome, Kita 13 Jo, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Kumakura
- Translational Medicine Function, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 140-8710, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Indirli R, Lanzi V, Mantovani G, Arosio M, Ferrante E. Bone health in functional hypothalamic amenorrhea: What the endocrinologist needs to know. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:946695. [PMID: 36303862 PMCID: PMC9592968 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.946695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In the original definition by Klinefelter, Albright and Griswold, the expression "hypothalamic hypoestrogenism" was used to describe functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea (FHA). Given the well-known effects of estrogens on bone, the physiopathology of skeletal fragility in this condition may appear self-explanatory. Actually, a growing body of evidence has clarified that estrogens are only part of the story. FHA occurs in eating disorders, overtraining, and during psychological or physical stress. Despite some specific characteristics which differentiate these conditions, relative energy deficiency is a common trigger that initiates the metabolic and endocrine derangements contributing to bone loss. Conversely, data on the impact of amenorrhoea on bone density or microarchitecture are controversial, and reduced bone mass is observed even in patients with preserved menstrual cycle. Consistently, oral estrogen-progestin combinations have not proven beneficial on bone density of amenorrheic women. Low bone density is a highly prevalent finding in these patients and entails an increased risk of stress or fragility fractures, and failure to achieve peak bone mass and target height in young girls. Pharmacological treatments have been studied, including androgens, insulin-like growth factor-1, bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, leptin, but none of them is currently approved for use in FHA. A timely screening for bone complications and a multidisciplinary, customized approach aiming to restore energy balance, ensure adequate protein, calcium and vitamin D intake, and reverse the detrimental metabolic-endocrine changes typical of this condition, should be the preferred approach until further studies are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Indirli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Rita Indirli,
| | - Valeria Lanzi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanna Mantovani
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Arosio
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Ferrante
- Endocrinology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Insufficient persistence to pharmacotherapy in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: an analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups in Japan. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:131. [PMID: 34515872 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00993-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In Japan, persistence and the 2-year MPR were inadequate in increasing fracture control efficacy despite a high adherence rate during the treatment period. Both factors were higher in females and those with polypharmacy but worsened with increasing age. PURPOSE Only a few large-scale studies have examined the care gap between the patients who need osteoporosis treatment and those who receive them in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in Japan. METHODS Continuation (persistence) rates and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy were investigated using medical insurance data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan, between April 2012 and March 2019. RESULTS The study included 528,806 male and 3,064,410 female patients. Persistence proportions were 56.6% in the first year and 46.3% in the second year. The medication possession ratio (MPR) from start to discontinuation of treatment (MPRdiscon) was 94.5%, and 92.7% of patients had an MPRdiscon ≥ 80%. The 2-year MPR (MPR730) was 61.9%, and 49.6% of patients had an MPR730 ≥ 80%. Both the persistence proportion and MPR730 were higher in females than in males, whereas MPRdiscon was higher in males. The persistence proportion and MPR730 were highest in the 70-79 years age group, whereas MPRdiscon improved with increasing age. The MPRdiscon and MPR730 were higher in the mixed-fracture and vertebral-fracture groups, respectively. The persistence proportion, MPRdiscon, and MPR730 were higher in patients with polypharmacy than in those without. CONCLUSION In Japan, persistence and the 2-year MPR were inadequate in increasing fracture control efficacy despite a high adherence rate during the treatment period. To bridge the care gap following osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, improvements are required for males, the elderly, and those without polypharmacy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim K, Won YY, Lee SW, Seo KD. The Effect of Teriparatide on the Hip: A Literature Review. Hip Pelvis 2021; 33:45-52. [PMID: 34141690 PMCID: PMC8190496 DOI: 10.5371/hp.2021.33.2.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Teriparatide (TPTD) is a bone-forming agent used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis. Since hip fractures are related to higher morbidity and mortality rates than other fractures, efficacious osteoporosis drugs for the hip are critical. We reviewed research articles reporting the efficacy of TPTD in terms of bone mineral density (BMD), fractures prevention, changes in the outer diameter, cortical thickness and porosity, post-operative periprosthetic BMD loss, and healing of typical and atypical fractures of the hip. Data meta-analyses indicated that TPTD not only increased the BMD of the proximal femur but also decreased the risk of hip fractures. Even though TPTD increases the cortical bone porosity of the proximal femur, the bone strength does not decrease as the majority of the porosity is located at the endocortex; further, it increases the outer diameter and thickens the cortical bone. TPTD stimulates bone remodeling and facilitates callus maturity and fracture healing. There have been many reports on improving the effect of TPTD on the healing of atypical fractures; therefore it is advisable to use TPTD considering the increase benefit compared to the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwangkyoun Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ye-Yeon Won
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Seok-Won Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kyung-Deok Seo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nakatoh S, Fujimori K, Tamaki J, Okimoto N, Ogawa S, Iki M. Insufficient persistence of and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 2021; 39:501-509. [PMID: 33403498 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-020-01188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Only a few large-scale studies have examined the care gap in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS The rates of continuation (persistence) of and adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy were investigated using medical insurance data, issued from July 2013 to December 2018, from the medical care system for elderly individuals in Hokkaido, Japan. RESULTS The study included 7918 male and 52,585 female patients. Persistence rates were 62.1% in the first year and 45.3% in the second year. There were 33,096 patients who discontinued medication; 8296 patients resumed medication during the observation period of 730 days. The median time to the discontinuation of medication for all the patients was 702 days. The 2-year medication possession ratio (MPR) was 63.8%; 30,989 patients (51.2%) had an MPR ≥ 80% and 20,788 (34.4%) had an MPR < 50%. Both the persistence and adherence were better in females than in males and worsened with increasing age. Comparisons of fracture history showed that persistence and MPR were higher in the no hip or vertebral fracture group, followed by hip fracture, vertebral fracture, and hip and vertebral fracture groups. Meanwhile, more patients in the hip fracture group had an MPR ≥ 80%. CONCLUSION Persistence of and adherence to osteoporotic pharmacotherapy are not very high in Japan. To bridge the care gap following osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, improvements are required for males, the elderly, and those with a history of vertebral fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Nakatoh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 477, Tomari, Asahimachi, Shimo-Niikawa-gun, Toyama, 939-0798, Japan.
| | - Kenji Fujimori
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Junko Tamaki
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Okimoto
- Okimoto Clinic, 185-4, Kubi, Yutaka-machi, Kure, Hiroshima, 734-0304, Japan
| | - Sumito Ogawa
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masayuki Iki
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kinki University, 377-2, Oono-Higashi, Osaka Sayama City, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramchand SK, David NL, Lee H, Eastell R, Tsai JN, Leder BZ. Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid in Maintaining Areal and Volumetric Bone Density After Combined Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration: DATA-HD Study Extension. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36:921-930. [PMID: 33507574 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Combined teriparatide and denosumab rapidly and substantially increases bone mineral density (BMD) at all anatomic sites. Discontinuation of denosumab however, results in high-turnover bone loss and increased fracture risk. The optimal way to prevent this bone loss remains undefined. This study is a preplanned extension of the DATA-HD study, where postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive 9 months of either 20 μg or 40 μg of teriparatide daily overlapping with denosumab (60 mg administered at months 3 and 9). At the completion of this 15-month study, women were invited to enroll in the DATA-HD Extension where they received a single dose of zoledronic acid (5 mg) 24 to 35 weeks after the last denosumab dose. Areal BMD and bone turnover markers were measured at month 27 and 42 (12 and 27 months after zoledronic acid, respectively) and spine and hip volumetric bone density by quantitative CT was measured at month 42. Fifty-three women enrolled in the DATA-HD Extension. At the femoral neck and total hip, the mean 5.6% and 5.1% gains in BMD achieved from month 0 to 15 were maintained both 12 and 27 months after zoledronic acid administration. At the spine, the mean 13.6% gain in BMD achieved from month 0 to 15 was maintained for the first 12 months but modestly decreased thereafter, resulting in a 3.0% reduction (95% CI, -4.0% to -2.0%, p < .0001) 27 months after zoledronic acid. The pattern of BMD changes between months 15 and 42 were qualitatively similar in the 20-μg and 40-μg groups. A single dose of zoledronic acid effectively maintains the large and rapid total hip and femoral neck BMD increases achieved with combination teriparatide/denosumab therapy for at least 27 months following the transition. Spine BMD was also largely, though not fully, maintained during this period. These data suggest that the DATA-HD Extension regimen may be an effective strategy in the long-term management of patients at high risk of fragility fracture. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabashini K Ramchand
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Natalie L David
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hang Lee
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Eastell
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Joy N Tsai
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Z Leder
- Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McClung MR. Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:775-791. [PMID: 33594648 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01708-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent evidence confirms the superiority of osteoanabolic therapy compared to anti-remodeling drugs for rapid improvement in bone density and fracture risk reduction, providing strong justification for the use of these anabolic agents as the initial therapy in high-risk patients, to be followed by anti-remodeling therapy. This review will highlight the results of recent studies and define the current status of osteoanabolic therapy for osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.
- Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chiba K, Yamada S, Yoda I, Era M, Yokota K, Okazaki N, Ota S, Isobe Y, Miyazaki S, Tashiro S, Nakashima S, Morimoto S, Sato S, Tsukazaki T, Watanabe T, Enomoto H, Yabe Y, Yonekura A, Tomita M, Ito M, Osaki M. Effects of monthly intravenous ibandronate on bone mineral density and microstructure in patients with primary osteoporosis after teriparatide treatment: The MONUMENT study. Bone 2021; 144:115770. [PMID: 33249321 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of sequential therapy with monthly intravenous ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and microstructure in patients with primary osteoporosis who received teriparatide treatment. METHODS Sixty-six patients with primary osteoporosis who had undergone teriparatide treatment for more than 12 months (mean 18.6 months) received sequential therapy with 1 mg/month intravenous ibandronate for 12 months. The patients were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative ultrasound, bone turnover markers, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at baseline and 6 and 12 months after beginning administration. RESULTS At 12 months after beginning sequential therapy, the bone resorption marker, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, decreased by 39.5%, with 82.3% of the patients exhibiting levels within the normal limit. DXA revealed that the BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 3.2%, with 79.0% of the patients exhibiting a response, and 40.3% experiencing an increase in BMD over 5%. HR-pQCT revealed that the cortical thickness of the distal tibia was increased by 2.6%. The cortical area increased by 2.5%, and the buckling ratio (an index of cortical instability) decreased by 2.5%. Most parameters of the trabecular bone showed no significant changes. These changes in the cortical bone were observed in both the distal radius and tibia and appeared beginning 6 months after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS Sequential therapy with monthly intravenous ibandronate increased the BMD and improved the cortical bone microstructure of osteoporotic patients who had undergone teriparatide treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Chiba
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan.
| | - Shuta Yamada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | | | - Makoto Era
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Yokota
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Narihiro Okazaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Shingo Ota
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Yusaku Isobe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Satsuki Miyazaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Shigeki Tashiro
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan
| | | | | | - Shuntaro Sato
- Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Akihiko Yonekura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | - Masato Tomita
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| | | | - Makoto Osaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Söreskog E, Lindberg I, Kanis JA, Åkesson KE, Willems D, Lorentzon M, Ström O, Berling P, Borgström F. Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:585-594. [PMID: 33409591 PMCID: PMC7929944 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05780-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Romosozumab is a novel bone-building drug that reduces fracture risk. This health economic analysis indicates that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. PURPOSE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate ("romosozumab-to-alendronate") compared with alendronate alone in patients with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Sweden. METHODS A microsimulation model with a Markov structure was used to simulate fractures, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), for women treated with romosozumab-to-alendronate or alendronate alone. Patients aged 74 years with a recent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were followed from the start of treatment until the age of 100 years or death. Treatment with romosozumab for 12 months was followed by alendronate for up to 48 months or alendronate alone with a maximum treatment duration of 60 months. The analysis had a societal perspective. Efficacy of romosozumab and alendronate were derived from phase III randomized controlled trials. Resource use and unit costs were collected from the literature. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with QALYs as effectiveness measures. RESULTS The base case analysis showed that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate treatment was associated with 0.089 additional QALYs at an additional cost of €3002 compared to alendronate alone, resulting in an ICER of €33,732. At a Swedish reference willingness-to-pay per QALY of €60,000, romosozumab-to-alendronate had a 97.9% probability of being cost-effective against alendronate alone. The results were most sensitive to time horizon, persistence assumptions, patient age, and treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - J A Kanis
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - K E Åkesson
- Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - M Lorentzon
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Geriatric Medicine Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - O Ström
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - F Borgström
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oser S, Häuselmann HJ. [Different Perspectives of Drug Holiday and Combination Therapies When Treating Osteoporosis]. PRAXIS 2021; 110:975-983. [PMID: 34875857 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Different Perspectives of Drug Holiday and Combination Therapies When Treating Osteoporosis Abstract. Sequential and combined therapy for osteoporosis is challenging because of the many options, and difficult because robust fracture data are not available, especially for combination therapies, mostly because the studies are too small. The principle of sequential and combined therapy for osteoporosis is that osteoanabolic therapy (teriparatide [TPTD]), whether sequential or combined, leads to an increase in bone mineral density (BMD), especially in the lumbar spine. The only exception is the sequence of TPTD after denosumab (Dmab), which leads to a loss (transient) of BMD in both the lumbar spine and the hip; for this reason, this sequence should be avoided at all costs. A second principle is that the stronger and longer the antiresorptive pretreatment was, the more delayed and reduced the effect of osteoanabolic therapy (TPTD). A third principle is the need for antiresorptive retreatment after therapies with TPTD and Dmab or their combination to prevent vertebral fractures (Dmab) and maintain bone density (TPTD). An effect of osteoanabolic therapy with TPTD on BMD of the hip is expected only in combination with antiresorptive therapy (bisphosphonates, Dmab). If the antiresorptive therapy is not continued, there is a transient loss in the first months of osteoanabolic monotherapy, the more so the stronger the antiresorptive pretreatment was.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Oser
- Zentrum für Rheuma- und Knochenerkrankungen, Klinik Im Park, Zürich
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shin HH, Choi HW, Lim JH, Kim JW, Chung BG. Near-Infrared Light-Triggered Thermo-responsive Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide)-Pyrrole Nanocomposites for Chemo-photothermal Cancer Therapy. NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS 2020; 15:214. [PMID: 33180229 PMCID: PMC7661614 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-020-03444-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The combination therapy based on multifunctional nanocomposites has been considered as a promising approach to improve cancer therapeutic efficacy. Herein, we report targeted multi-functional poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM)-based nanocomposites for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy toward breast cancer cells. To increase the transition temperature, acrylic acid (AAc) was added in synthetic process of PNIPAM, showing that the intrinsic lower critical solution temperature was changed to 42 °C . To generate the photothermal effect under near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation (808 nm), polypyrrole (ppy) nanoparticles were uniformly decorated in PNIPAM-AAc. Folic acid (FA), as a cancer targeting ligand, was successfully conjugated on the surplus carboxyl groups in PNIPAM network. The drug release of PNIPAM-ppy-FA nanocomposites was efficiently triggered in response to the temperature change by NIR laser irradiation. We also confirmed that PNIPAM-ppy-FA was internalized to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by folate-receptor-mediated endocytosis and significantly enhanced cancer therapeutic efficacy with combination treatment of chemo-photothermal effects. Therefore, our work encourages further exploration of multi-functional nanocarrier agents for synergistic therapeutic approaches to different types of cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha Hee Shin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Woo Choi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Lim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Woon Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong Geun Chung
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Langdahl B. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with bone-forming and antiresorptive treatments: Combined and sequential approaches. Bone 2020; 139:115516. [PMID: 32622871 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the most commonly used antiresorptive therapies. Despite differences in the increase in bone mineral density seen with these drugs, the reductions in fracture risk are similar; 50-70%, 20%, and 40% for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, respectively. The bone-forming treatments; teriparatide and abaloparatide increase bone mineral density more than the antiresorptives and the reductions in fracture risk are 85% and 40-50% for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively, compared to placebo. The VERO study demonstrated a >50% reduction in vertebral and clinical fractures in women treated with teriparatide compared to risedronate. The dual-action treatment; romosozumab leads to more pronounced increases in BMD than other treatment modalities and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures by 73% and 36% compared to placebo after 12 months and the sequential treatment regime; romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate reduced the risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures by 48%, 20% and 38%, respectively compared to alendronate after 2-3 years. The evidence for combination therapy targeting both resorption and formation is limited as only short-term studies with BMD as the endpoint have been performed. All bone-forming and dual-action treatments increase BMD and reduce the fracture risk, however, the effect wears off with time and treatment is therefore only temporary and should be followed by antiresorptive treatment with a bisphosphonate or denosumab. The sequence of treatment matters as the BMD response to teriparatide is reduced in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates; however, based on the findings of the VERO trial, the anti-fracture efficacy of bone-forming treatment in comparison with risedronate seems to be preserved after bisphosphonate therapy. The DATA study suggested that transitioning from denosumab to teriparatide is problematic due to the increase in bone resorption occurring after stopping denosumab. Studies have shown further improvements in BMD when transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to zoledronic acid or denosumab. Management of osteoporosis will in many patients include a long-term treatment plan. This will often include sequential therapy which in severe cases preferably should start with bone-forming followed by antiresorptive treatment. The severity of osteoporosis, reaching a treatment goal, and responding to treatment failure are important factors determining the treatment sequence in the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Langdahl
- Aarhus University Hospital, Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Palle Juul Jensen Boulevard 115, DK8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dell'Aquila E, Armento G, Iuliani M, Simonetti S, D'Onofrio L, Zeppola T, Madaudo C, Russano M, Citarella F, Ribelli G, Pantano F, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Santini D. Denosumab for cancer-related bone loss. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020; 20:1261-1274. [PMID: 32835531 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1814731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prolonged use of anti-cancer treatments in breast and prostate tumors alters physiological bone turnover leading to adverse skeletal related events, such as osteoporosis, loss of bone mass, and increased risk of fractures. These complications known as cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) should be managed with bone targeting agents such as the bisphosphonates and denosumab. The latter is a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) that suppresses osteoclasts function and survival increasing bone mass. AREAS COVERED This review will focus on the mechanisms associated with bone loss induced by cancer treatments and the most recent evidence about the use of denosumab as preventive and therapeutic strategy to protect bone health. Moreover, we will discuss several key aspects regarding the clinical practical use of denosumab to optimize the management of CTLIB in breast and prostate cancer. EXPERT OPINION Denosumab treatment strongly prevents cancer therapies-related skeletal issues in breast and prostate cancer with a good safety profile. Adjuvant six-monthly denosumab delays the time to first fracture onset in early stage breast cancer patients with normal or altered bone mineral density (BMD). Similarly, denosumab treatment is able to prevent fractures and BMD loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grazia Armento
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Michele Iuliani
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Sonia Simonetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Loretta D'Onofrio
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Tea Zeppola
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Cristina Madaudo
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Marco Russano
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Fabrizio Citarella
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Giulia Ribelli
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Francesco Pantano
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| | - Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology Department, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome , Rome, Itlay
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
With increasing longevity of the population globally, the prevalence of osteoporosis will rise, associated with significant morbidity, disability and increased mortality. Adequate intake of calcium, vitamin D, increasing physical activity, a strategy of avoiding falls, cessation of smoking and avoiding excessive alcohol intake are pivotal in maintaining healthy bones in all age groups. Oral bisphosphonates remain the most cost-effective first line of treatment. Better methods of identifying patients with high fracture risk is needed as there is adequate effective treatment for osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
26
|
Davis S, Simpson E, Hamilton J, James MMS, Rawdin A, Wong R, Goka E, Gittoes N, Selby P. Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-314. [PMID: 32588816 PMCID: PMC7357239 DOI: 10.3310/hta24290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of non-bisphosphonates {denosumab [Prolia®; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA], raloxifene [Evista®; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan], romosozumab [Evenity®; Union Chimique Belge (UCB) S.A. (Brussels, Belgium) and Amgen Inc.] and teriparatide [Forsteo®; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA]}, compared with each other, bisphosphonates or no treatment, for the prevention of fragility fracture. DATA SOURCES For the clinical effectiveness review, nine electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched up to July 2018. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review and network meta-analysis of fracture and femoral neck bone mineral density were conducted. A review of published economic analyses was undertaken and a model previously used to evaluate bisphosphonates was adapted. Discrete event simulation was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years for a simulated cohort of patients with heterogeneous characteristics. This was done for each non-bisphosphonate treatment, a strategy of no treatment, and the five bisphosphonate treatments previously evaluated. The model was populated with effectiveness evidence from the systematic review and network meta-analysis. All other parameters were estimated from published sources. An NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Fracture risk was estimated from patient characteristics using the QFracture® (QFracture-2012 open source revision 38, Clinrisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and FRAX® (web version 3.9, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK) tools. The relationship between fracture risk and incremental net monetary benefit was estimated using non-parametric regression. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were used to assess uncertainty. RESULTS Fifty-two randomised controlled trials of non-bisphosphonates were included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review and an additional 51 randomised controlled trials of bisphosphonates were included in the network meta-analysis. All treatments had beneficial effects compared with placebo for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, with hazard ratios varying from 0.23 to 0.94, depending on treatment and fracture type. The effects on vertebral fractures and the percentage change in bone mineral density were statistically significant for all treatments. The rate of serious adverse events varied across trials (0-33%), with most between-group differences not being statistically significant for comparisons with placebo/no active treatment, non-bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were > £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for all non-bisphosphonate interventions compared with no treatment across the range of QFracture and FRAX scores expected in the population eligible for fracture risk assessment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for denosumab may fall below £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year at very high levels of risk or for high-risk patients with specific characteristics. Raloxifene was dominated by no treatment (resulted in fewer quality-adjusted life-years) in most risk categories. LIMITATIONS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are uncertain for very high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Non-bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are generally greater than the commonly applied threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018107651. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 29. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Davis
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma Simpson
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marrissa Martyn-St James
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Rawdin
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Goka
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Neil Gittoes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Langdahl BL. Overview of treatment approaches to osteoporosis. Br J Pharmacol 2020; 178:1891-1906. [PMID: 32060897 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Efficient therapies are available for the treatment of osteoporosis. Anti-resorptive therapies, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of fractures by 20-70%. Bone-forming or dual-action treatments stimulate bone formation and increase BMD more than the anti-resorptive therapies. Two studies have demonstrated that these treatments are superior to anti-resorptives in preventing fractures in patients with severe osteoporosis. Bone-forming or dual-action treatments should be followed by anti-resorptive treatment to maintain the fracture risk reduction. The BMD gains seen with bone-forming and dual-action treatments are greater in treatment-naïve patients compared to patients pretreated with anti-resorptive treatments. However, the antifracture efficacy seems to be preserved. Treatment failure will often lead to switch of treatment from orally to parentally administrated anti-resorptives treatment or from anti-resorptive to bone-forming or dual-action treatment. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition and therefore needs a long-term management plan with a personalized approach to treatment. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The molecular pharmacology of bone and cancer-related bone diseases. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.9/issuetoc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente L Langdahl
- Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Le QA, Delevry D. The Authors Respond. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2020; 26:335-336. [PMID: 32105177 PMCID: PMC10391098 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.3.335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
DISCLOSURES Funding for the original study referred to in this letter was received through the PhRMA Foundation Value Assessment Challenge Award. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang A Le
- Western University of Health Sciences College of Pharmacy
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Yavropoulou MP, Makras P. Combination and sequential treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:477-490. [PMID: 31990595 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1717468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Since postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic, potentially disabling condition requiring long-term treatment, the physician is expected to decide the optimal treatment strategy, e.g. how to use the available osteoanabolic and antiresorptive agents, sequentially or in combination, in the most effective and safe way, based on personalized patient care.Areas covered: Herein, the authors outline clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of various sequential treatment strategies. More specifically, they compare the efficacy of osteoanabolic agents when they precede or follow antiresorptive treatment, as well as the efficacy of antiresorptives following other antiresorptives. Finally, the authors quote and discuss available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the co-administration of osteoanabolics and antiresorptives in comparison with monotherapies.Expert opinion: Initiation with an osteoanabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive seems to be the optimal treatment sequence, at least in patients with severe osteoporosis. Osteoanabolic treatment following antiresorptives seems to lead in more modest responses in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. Combination therapy with teriparatide and denosumab or zoledronate has achieved higher BMD gains compared to each agent alone; however, due to the high cost, combination therapy is rarely compensated. On the contrary, the combination of teriparatide with alendronate results in smaller BMD increases than TPTD monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stergios A Polyzos
- First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria P Yavropoulou
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Polyzois Makras
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Invernizzi M, de Sire A, Renò F, Cisari C, Runza L, Baricich A, Carda S, Fusco N. Spinal Cord Injury as a Model of Bone-Muscle Interactions: Therapeutic Implications From in vitro and in vivo Studies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:204. [PMID: 32351450 PMCID: PMC7174687 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) represent a variety of conditions related to the damage of the spinal cord with consequent musculoskeletal repercussions. The bone and muscle tissues share several catabolic pathways that lead to variable degrees of disability in SCI patients. In this review article, we provide a comprehensive characterization of the available treatment options targeting the skeleton and the bone in the setting of SCI. Among the pharmacological intervention, bisphosphonates, anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies, hydrogen sulfide, parathyroid hormone, and RANKL pathway inhibitors represent valuable options for treating bone alterations. Loss phenomena at the level of the muscle can be counteracted with testosterone, anabolic-androgenic steroids, and selective androgen receptor modulators. Exercise and physical therapy are valuable strategies to increase bone and muscle mass. Nutritional interventions could enhance SCI treatment, particularly in the setting of synergistic and multidisciplinary interventions, but there are no specific guidelines available to date. The development of multidisciplinary recommendations is required for a proper clinical management of SCI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Invernizzi
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- *Correspondence: Marco Invernizzi
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- Rehabilitation Unit, “Mons. L. Novarese” Hospital, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Filippo Renò
- Innovative Research Laboratory for Wound Healing, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Carlo Cisari
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Letterio Runza
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Baricich
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
| | - Stefano Carda
- Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience. Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, IEO - European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yamashita J, McCauley LK. Effects of Intermittent Administration of Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein on Fracture Healing: A Narrative Review of Animal and Human Studies. JBMR Plus 2019; 3:e10250. [PMID: 31844831 PMCID: PMC6894727 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) stimulates skeletal remodeling and is a potent anabolic agent in bone. PTH‐related protein (PTHrP) is anabolic acting on the same PTH1 receptor and is in therapeutic use for osteoporosis. The body of literature for PTH actions in fracture healing is emerging with promising yet not entirely consistent results. The objective of this review was to perform a literature analysis to extract up‐to‐date knowledge on the effects of intermittent PTH and PTHrP therapy in bone fracture healing. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed. Clinical case studies and articles related to “regeneration,” “implant,” and “distraction osteogenesis” were excluded. A narrative review was performed to deliberate the therapeutic potential of intermittent PTH administration on fracture healing. A smaller number of studies centered on the use of PTHrP or a PTHrP analog were also reviewed. Animal studies clearly show that intermittent PTH therapy promotes fracture healing and revealed the strong therapeutic potential of PTH. Human subject studies were fewer and not as consistent as the animal studies yet provide insight into the potential of intermittent PTH administration on fracture healing. Differences in outcomes for animal and human studies appear to be attributed partly to variable doses, fracture sites, age, remodeling patterns, and bone architectures, although other factors are involved. Future studies to examine the dose, timing, and duration of PTH administration will be necessary to further delineate the therapeutic potential of PTH for fracture healing in humans. © 2019 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junro Yamashita
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College Fukuoka Japan
| | - Laurie K McCauley
- Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA.,Department of Pathology, Medical School University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lyu H, Zhao SS, Yoshida K, Tedeschi SK, Xu C, Nigwekar SU, Leder BZ, Solomon DH. Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104:5611-5620. [PMID: 31265071 PMCID: PMC6785688 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Teriparatide and denosumab are effective treatments for osteoporosis and typically reserved as second-line options after patients have used bisphosphonates. However, limited head-to-head comparative effectiveness data exist between teriparatide and denosumab. OBJECTIVE We compared changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between groups treated with teriparatide or denosumab after using bisphosphonates, focusing on the change in BMD while on either drug over 2 years. DESIGN Observational cohort study using electronic medical records from two academic medical centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS The study population included osteoporotic patients >45 years who received bisphosphonates >1 year before switching to teriparatide or denosumab. OUTCOME MEASURES Annualized BMD change from baseline at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. RESULTS Patients treated with teriparatide (n = 110) were compared with those treated with denosumab (n = 105); the mean (SD) age was 70 (10) years and median duration (interquartile range) of bisphosphonate use was 7.0 (5.6 to 9.7) years. Compared with denosumab users, teriparatide users had higher annualized BMD change at the spine by 1.3% (95% CI 0.02, 2.7%) but lower at the total hip by -2.2% (95% CI -2.9 to -1.5%) and the femoral neck by -1.1% (95% CI -2.1 to -0.1%). Those who switched to teriparatide had a transient loss of hip BMD for the first year, with no overall increase in the total hip BMD over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who use long-term bisphosphonates, the decision of switching to teriparatide should be made with caution, especially for patients at high risk of hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houchen Lyu
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
- China National Clinical Research Center of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Beijing, China
- Correspondence and Reprint Requests: Houchen Lyu, MD, PhD, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 6016L, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail:
| | - Sizheng S Zhao
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Kazuki Yoshida
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara K Tedeschi
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chang Xu
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sagar U Nigwekar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Z Leder
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel H Solomon
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Le QA. Patient-Level Modeling Approach Using Discrete-Event Simulation: A Cost-Effectiveness Study of Current Treatment Guidelines for Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019; 25:1089-1095. [PMID: 31556816 PMCID: PMC10397705 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.10.1089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Decision tree and Markov models have been the most commonly used modeling methods in health economic evaluations. Both methods are known for their limitations. Discrete-event simulation (DES), an event-driven model in continuous time at the patient level, is a relatively new method in health economic evaluations that addresses some limitations of the common modeling techniques. Specifically, with the advent of personalized medicine, conventional methods for value assessment that are based on population-level measures might not be appropriate. The best treatment would depend on patient characteristics and clinical profiles. Value assessment of health interventions can vary substantially and may lead to different health decision making due to patient heterogeneity. As such, modeling at the patient level is an appropriate approach for value assessment of health interventions. The DES model has several advantages, such as flexibility, ability to reflect patient heterogeneity, increased precision, and better characterization of modeling uncertainty, that may be preferred to decision tree and Markov models. In addition, with increasing health care spending and drug prices, it is important to quantify value of available treatment options for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The purpose of this Viewpoints article was to describe and demonstrate an application of a DES model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the current treatment guidelines for women with PMO. In particular, the DES model indicated that the optimal treatment at the common willingness-to-pay thresholds between $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $150,000 per QALY was denosumab. Analysis of patient heterogeneity in terms of low, medium, high, and very high risk of fractures resulted in a similar conclusion. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was received through the PhRMA Foundation Value Assessment Challenge Award. The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang A. Le
- College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cardinal M, Tys J, Roels T, Lafont S, Ominsky MS, Devogelaer JP, Chappard D, Mabilleau G, Ammann P, Nyssen-Behets C, Manicourt DH. Sclerostin antibody reduces long bone fractures in the oim/oim model of osteogenesis imperfecta. Bone 2019; 124:137-147. [PMID: 31051315 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2018] [Revised: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta type III (OI) is a serious genetic condition with poor bone quality and a high fracture rate in children. In a previous study, it was shown that a monoclonal antibody neutralizing sclerostin (Scl-Ab) increases strength and vertebral bone mass while reducing the number of axial fractures in oim/oim, a mouse model of OI type III. Here, we analyze the impact of Scl-Ab on long bones in OI mice. After 9 weeks of treatment, Scl-Ab significantly reduced long bone fractures (3.6 ± 0.3 versus 2.1 ± 0.8 per mouse, p < 0.001). In addition, the cortical thickness of the tibial midshaft was increased (+42%, p < 0.001), as well as BMD (+28%, p < 0.001), ultimate load (+86%, p < 0.05), plastic energy (+184%; p < 0.05) and stiffness (+172%; p < 0.01) in OI Scl-Ab mice compared to OI vehicle controls. Similar effects of Scl-Ab were observed in Wild type (Wt) mice. The plastic energy, which reflects the fragility of the tissue, was lower in the OI than in the Wt and significantly improved with the Scl-Ab treatment. At the tissue level by nanoindentation, Scl-Ab slightly increased the elastic modulus in bones of both OI and Wt, while moderately increasing tissue hardness (+13% compared to the vehicle; p < 0.05) in Wt bones, but not in OI bones. Although it did not change the properties of the OI bone matrix material, Scl-Ab reduced the fracture rate of the long bones by improving its bone mass, density, geometry, and biomechanical strength. These results suggest that Scl-Ab can reduce long-bone fractures in patients with OI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mickaël Cardinal
- Pole of Morphology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Janne Tys
- Pole of Morphology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Thomas Roels
- Pole of Morphology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Sébastien Lafont
- Pole of Morphology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Michael S Ominsky
- Radius, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA, formerly at Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
| | - Jean-Pierre Devogelaer
- Pole of Rheumatic Pathologies, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | - Patrick Ammann
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Catherine Nyssen-Behets
- Pole of Morphology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Daniel H Manicourt
- Pole of Rheumatic Pathologies, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Haider IT, Simonian N, Saini AS, Leung FM, Edwards WB, Schnitzer TJ. Open-label clinical trial of alendronate after teriparatide therapy in people with spinal cord injury and low bone mineral density. Spinal Cord 2019; 57:832-842. [DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0303-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
36
|
Guañabens N, Moro-Álvarez MJ, Casado E, Blanch-Rubió J, Gómez-Alonso C, Díaz-Guerra GM, Del Pino-Montes J, Valero Díaz de Lamadrid C, Peris P, Muñoz-Torres M. The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment. Endocrine 2019; 64:441-455. [PMID: 30963388 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-019-01919-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Several antiresorptive drugs, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, are currently available for the treatment of osteoporosis due to their evidenced efficacy in reducing fracture risk at mid-term. Osteoanabolic therapies, like teriparatide, whose treatment duration is limited to 2 years, have also shown efficacy in the reduction of fracture risk. However, depending on the severity of osteoporosis and the presence of other associated risk factors for fracture, some patients may require long-term treatment to preserve optimal bone strength and minimize bone fracture risk. Given the limited duration of some treatments, the fact that most of the antiresorptive drugs have not been assessed beyond 10 years, and the known long-term safety issues of these drugs, including atypical femoral fractures or osteonecrosis of the jaw, the long-term management of these patients may require an approach based on drug discontinuation and/or switching. In this regard, interest in sequential osteoporosis therapy, wherein drugs are initiated and discontinued over time, has grown in recent years, although the establishment of an optimal and individualized order of therapies remains controversial. This review reports the currently available clinical evidence on the discontinuation effects of different anti-osteoporotic drugs, as well as the clinical outcomes of the different sequential treatment regimens. The objective of this article is to present up-to-date practical knowledge on this area in order to provide guidance to the clinicians involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Guañabens
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Enrique Casado
- Rheumatology Department, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | - Carlos Gómez-Alonso
- Bone and Mineral Metabolism Unit, Central University Hospital of Asturias (HUCA), University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid
- University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Research Institute Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Pilar Peris
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Muñoz-Torres
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio de Granada, Department of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (Ibs.GRANADA), CIBERFES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sølling ASK, Harsløf T, Langdahl B. Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:625-638. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00675-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
38
|
Takács I, Jókai E, Kováts DE, Aradi I. The first biosimilar approved for the treatment of osteoporosis: results of a comparative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:675-683. [PMID: 30357438 PMCID: PMC6422976 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4741-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED To demonstrate the clinical comparability between RGB-10 (a biosimilar teriparatide) and the originator, a comparative pharmacokinetic trial was conducted. The study was successful in establishing bioequivalence. Marketing authorisation for RGB-10 (Terrosa®) was granted by the European Medicines Agency in 2017. INTRODUCTION Teriparatide, the first bone anabolic agent, is the biologically active fragment of human parathyroid hormone. The imminent patent expiry of the originator will open the door for biosimilars to enter the osteology market, thereby improving access to a highly effective, yet prohibitively expensive therapy. METHODS Subsequent to establishing comparability on the quality and non-clinical levels between RGB-10, a biosimilar teriparatide, and its reference product (Forsteo®), a randomised, double-blind, 2-way cross-over comparative study (duration: four days) was conducted in 54 healthy women (ages: 18 to 55 years) to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) equivalence and comparable safety of these products. Extents of exposure (AUC0-tlast) and peak exposure (Cmax), as measured by means of ELISA, were evaluated as co-primary PK endpoints, and serum calcium levels, as measured using standard automated techniques, were assessed for PD effects. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS The 94.12% CIs for the ratio of the test to the reference treatments, used due to the two-stage design (85.20-98.60% and 85.51-99.52% for AUC0-tlast and Cmax, respectively), fell within the 80.00-125.00% acceptance range. The calcium PD parameters were essentially identical with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of 99.93% and 99.87% for AUC and Cmax, respectively. Analysis of the safety data did not reveal any differences between RGB-10 and its reference. CONCLUSION Based on the high level of similarity in the preclinical data and the results of this clinical study, marketing authorisation for RGB-10 (Terrosa®) was granted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Takács
- Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - E Jókai
- Gedeon Richter Plc, 19-21 Gyömrői út, Budapest, H-1103, Hungary.
| | - D E Kováts
- Gedeon Richter Plc, 19-21 Gyömrői út, Budapest, H-1103, Hungary
| | - I Aradi
- Gedeon Richter Plc, 19-21 Gyömrői út, Budapest, H-1103, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Le QA, Hay JW, Becker R, Wang Y. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Treatment of Abaloparatide Followed by Alendronate Versus Teriparatide Followed by Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis in the United States. Ann Pharmacother 2019; 53:134-143. [PMID: 30160186 PMCID: PMC6311620 DOI: 10.1177/1060028018798034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved abaloparatide (ABL) for treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) at high risk of fracture. With increasing health care spending and drug prices, it is important to quantify the value of newly available treatment options for PMO. OBJECTIVE To determine cost-effectiveness of ABL compared with teriparatide (TPTD) for treatment of women with PMO in the United States. METHODS A discrete-event simulation (DES) model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness of ABL from the US health care perspective. The model included three 18-month treatment strategies with either placebo (PBO), TPTD, or ABL, all followed by additional 5-year treatment with alendronate (ALN). High-risk patients were defined as women with PMO ⩾65 years old with a prior vertebral fracture. Baseline clinical event rates, risk reductions, and patient characteristics were based on the Abaloparatide Comparator Trial in Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE) trial. RESULTS Over a 10-year period, the DES model yielded average total discounted per-patient costs of $10 212, $46 783, and $26 837 and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 6.742, 6.781, and 6.792 for PBO/ALN, TPTD/ALN, and ABL/ALN, respectively. Compared with TPTD/ALN, ABL/ALN accrued higher QALYs at lower cost and produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $333 266/QALY relative to PBO/ALN. In high-risk women, ABL/ALN also had more QALYs and less cost over TPTD/ALN and yielded an ICER of $188 891/QALY relative to PBO/ALN. Conclusion and Relevance: ABL is a dominant treatment strategy over TPTD. In women with PMO at high risk of fracture, ABL is an alternative cost-effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quang A. Le
- Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - Joel W. Hay
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hiligsmann M, Reginster JY, Tosteson ANA, Bukata SV, Saag KG, Gold DT, Halbout P, Jiwa F, Lewiecki EM, Pinto D, Adachi JD, Al-Daghri N, Bruyère O, Chandran M, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Einhorn TA, Kanis JA, Kendler DL, Messina OD, Rizzoli R, Si L, Silverman S. Recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis: outcomes of an experts' consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the US branch of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:45-57. [PMID: 30382319 PMCID: PMC6331734 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Economic evaluations are increasingly used to assess the value of health interventions, but variable quality and heterogeneity limit the use of these evaluations by decision-makers. These recommendations provide guidance for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. INTRODUCTION This paper aims to provide recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis in order to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. METHODS A working group was convened by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis to make recommendations for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, to define an osteoporosis-specific reference case to serve a minimum standard for all economic analyses in osteoporosis, to discuss methodologic challenges and initiate a call for research. A literature review, a face-to-face meeting in New York City (including 11 experts), and a review/approval by a larger group of experts worldwide (including 23 experts in total) were conducted. RESULTS Recommendations on the type of economic evaluation, methods for economic evaluation, modeling aspects, base-case analysis and population, excess mortality, fracture costs and disutility, treatment characteristics, and model validation were provided. Recommendations for reporting economic evaluations in osteoporosis were also made and an osteoporosis-specific checklist was designed that includes items to report when performing an economic evaluation in osteoporosis. Further, 12 minimum criteria for economic evaluations in osteoporosis were identified and 12 methodologic challenges and need for further research were discussed. CONCLUSION While the working group acknowledges challenges and the need for further research, these recommendations are intended to supplement general and national guidelines for economic evaluations, improve transparency, quality, and comparability of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, and maintain methodologic standards to increase their use by decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - A N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - S V Bukata
- UCLA Orthopaedic Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D T Gold
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - F Jiwa
- Patients Societies at the International Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, Canada
| | - E M Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - D Pinto
- Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - J D Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - N Al-Daghri
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - O Bruyère
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Chandran
- Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- UKNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - T A Einhorn
- New York University Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D L Kendler
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - O D Messina
- Cosme Argerich Hospital and IRO medical research centre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Rizzoli
- Service of Bone Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NH, Australia
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S Silverman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine and the OMC Clinical Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:3-44. [PMID: 30324412 PMCID: PMC7026233 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 894] [Impact Index Per Article: 178.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women at risk from fractures due to osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2013. This manuscript updates these in a European setting. METHODS Systematic reviews were updated. RESULTS The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk; general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis; monitoring of treatment; assessment of fracture risk; case-finding strategies; investigation of patients; health economics of treatment. The update includes new information on the evaluation of bone microstructure evaluation in facture risk assessment, the role of FRAX® and Fracture Liaison Services in secondary fracture prevention, long-term effects on fracture risk of dietary intakes, and increased fracture risk on stopping drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Rizzoli
- University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Prince Mutaib Chair for Biomarkers of Osteoporosis, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chang B, Quan Q, Li Y, Qiu H, Peng J, Gu Y. Treatment of Osteoporosis, with a Focus on 2 Monoclonal Antibodies. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24:8758-8766. [PMID: 30508820 PMCID: PMC6289028 DOI: 10.12659/msm.912309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease characterized by bone loss and subsequent increased risk of fragility fractures. Recent advances in our mechanistic understanding of molecular communications among osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes give insight into the important roles of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway and the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in the process of bone remodeling. Due to the translation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway and the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in the regulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, new targets have been studied in recent years, such as sclerostin and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). In this review, we first introduce the signaling pathways involved in interactions among osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes. Next, we describe clinical trials of denosumab and romosozumab, which are monoclonal antibodies that target RANKL and sclerostin, respectively. We analyze the efficacy of these drugs and provide a profile for the management of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Chang
- Department of Laser Medicine, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Qi Quan
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yunqi Li
- Department of Laser Medicine, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Haixia Qiu
- Department of Laser Medicine, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jiang Peng
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Ying Gu
- Department of Laser Medicine, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Aloumanis K, Kapetanos G, Alexandridis T, Drossinos V, Papaioannou N. Conducting an observational study during an economic crisis: analysis of the treatment and follow-up phase of Greek patients participating in the ExFOS study. Hormones (Athens) 2018; 17:531-540. [PMID: 30430458 DOI: 10.1007/s42000-018-0077-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present the subanalysis of the Greek cohort of the Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS), a multicenter, non-interventional, prospective, observational study evaluating the effect of teriparatide on fractures, back pain (BP), health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and safety and compliance, in patients with osteoporosis treated for up to 24 months, with a post-treatment follow-up of at least 18 months. DESIGN A total of 439 osteoporotic patients (92.2% female) were enrolled in Greece. New or worsened fractures, based on their physicians' assessment, as well as patients' self-assessment of HR-QoL and BP, compliance, and safety profile, were captured by validated questionnaires. RESULTS In the ExFOS Greek cohort, fracture rates were low and mean bone mineral density (BMD) was numerically improved. Compliance with teriparatide remained high throughout the study, with 81.5% of subjects completing treatment. Only 0.7% of patients reported discontinuation due to adverse effects. A sustainable improvement in patient-perceived BP and HRQoL throughout treatment and follow-up was similar to that achieved by the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS). A lower than expected percentage of patients using antiresorptives following teriparatide was recorded. CONCLUSIONS ExFOS reproduces the outcomes of EFOS, with a 6.5-year time interval between studies, in comparable cohorts of osteoporotic patients. Data should be interpreted in the context of observational study data collection, although summary statistics computed at each time point may overstate drug effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriakos Aloumanis
- Department of Medical Research, Pharmaserve Lilly, 15th Km National Road Athens-Lamia, Kifissia, Greece.
| | - G Kapetanos
- Papageorgiou General Hospital, 3rd Orthopedics University Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - T Alexandridis
- Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
| | - V Drossinos
- Department of Medical Research, Pharmaserve Lilly, 15th Km National Road Athens-Lamia, Kifissia, Greece
| | - N Papaioannou
- Musculoskeletal Diseases Research Laboratory, Athens General Hospital "KAT", Kifissia, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Osteoporosis increases the risk of fractures, which are associated with increased mortality and lower quality of life. Patients with prevalent fracture are at high risk to of sustaining another one. Optimal protein and calcium intakes, and vitamin D supplies, together with regular weight bearing physical exercise are the corner stones of fracture prevention. Evidence for anti-fracture efficacy of pharmacological interventions relies on results from randomised controlled trials in postmenopausal women with fractures as the primary outcome. Treatments with bone resorption inhibitors, like bisphosphonates or denosumab, and bone formation stimulator like teriparatide, reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk. A reduction in vertebral fracture risk can already be detected within a year after starting therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Rizzoli
- Service of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, Debiais F, Feron JM, Gauvain JB, Guggenbuhl P, Legrand E, Lehr-Drylewicz AM, Lespessailles E, Tremollieres F, Weryha G, Cortet B. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rhum.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
46
|
Napoli N, Langdahl BL, Ljunggren Ö, Lespessailles E, Kapetanos G, Kocjan T, Nikolic T, Eiken P, Petto H, Moll T, Lindh E, Marin F. Effects of Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis in Clinical Practice: 42-Month Results During and After Discontinuation of Treatment from the European Extended Forsteo® Observational Study (ExFOS). Calcif Tissue Int 2018; 103:359-371. [PMID: 29909449 PMCID: PMC6153867 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-018-0437-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients prescribed teriparatide and followed up for 18 months after stopping the drug in real-life conditions. The Extended Forsteo® Observational Study analysed incident clinical fractures in 6-month intervals using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes in back pain (visual analogue scale) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D questionnaire) were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Patients were analysed if they had a post-baseline visit, regardless of whether and for how long they took teriparatide. Of 1531 patients analysed (90.7% female, mean age: 70.3 years), 76 (5.0%) never took teriparatide. Median treatment duration was 23.6 months. The adjusted odds of clinical fracture decreased by 47% in the > 12- to 18-month treatment period (p = 0.013) compared with the first 6-month period, with no statistically significant reduction in the > 18- to 24-month interval. The clinical fracture rate remained stable during the 18 months' post-teriparatide, when approximately 98% of patients took osteoporosis medication (51% bisphosphonates). Clinical vertebral fractures were reduced at every time period compared with the first 6 months. Adjusted mean back pain scores decreased and EQ-5D scores increased significantly at each post-baseline observation. In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of clinical fractures declined during 24 months of teriparatide treatment. This reduction was maintained 18 months after stopping teriparatide. In parallel, patients reported significant improvements in back pain and HRQoL. The results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Napoli
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Östen Ljunggren
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eric Lespessailles
- University Orléans, Orléans, France
- Regional Hospital of Orléans, Orléans, France
| | | | | | | | - Pia Eiken
- Department of Cardiology, Nephrology and Endocrinology, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Kono T, Sudo A. Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial. JBMR Plus 2018; 2:289-294. [PMID: 30283910 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There is no consensus on an optimal treatment after daily teriparatide (TPTD). We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label, 12-month trial to investigate the efficacy of follow-up treatment after daily TPTD treatment for Japanese patients. Three-hundred patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral bisphosphonate (BP) including alendronate (ALN; 35 mg/week) and minodoronate (MINO; 50 mg/month), or subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg/6 month). The primary efficacy measure was bone mineral density (BMD) responses in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.3 ± 5.1% in the ALN subgroups, 0.5 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 4.3 ± 3.5% in the denosumab subgroups. Femoral neck BMD increased by 0.7 ± 4.6% in the ALN subgroups, 0.2 ± 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 1.4 ± 3.4% in the denosumab subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups. There were no significant differences in FN BMD increases among the three subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups, whereas FN BMD increases were not significant. Denosumab treatment was more effective in increasing BMD and therefore has the potential benefit of fracture prevention. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal treatment after daily TPTD. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Niimi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Tomidahama Hospital Mie Japan
| | - Toshibumi Kono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Tomidahama Hospital Mie Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Hasegawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Mie University Graduate School of Medicine Mie Japan
| | - Toshihiko Kono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Tomidahama Hospital Mie Japan
| | - Akihiro Sudo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Mie University Graduate School of Medicine Mie Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Usui T, Funagoshi M, Seto K, Ide K, Tanaka S, Kawakami K. Persistence of and switches from teriparatide treatment among women and men with osteoporosis in the real world: a claims database analysis. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13:54. [PMID: 29725863 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-018-0466-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This study investigated the real-world persistence rate and switches of teriparatide-treated patients using a claims database in Japan. The persistence rate of teriparatide at 12 months was 34.9%, and approximately one-third of the patients were not treated with any osteoporosis drugs after teriparatide. Improvement in persistence and switches are desired. PURPOSE We aimed to elucidate the persistence rates and switches before and after teriparatide treatment in real-world osteoporosis patients based on data from a medical claims database in Japan. METHODS We reviewed the records of patients with diagnoses of osteoporosis who were prescribed teriparatide at least once from January 2005 to June 2017. Patients with a follow-up ≤ 90 days before the first and ≤ 90 days after the last prescription of teriparatide were excluded. Discontinuation was defined as no treatment for > 90 days. We investigated treatment duration, compared characteristics of patients with persistence ≤ 12 and > 12 months, and osteoporotic medications before and after teriparatide by weekly or daily teriparatide. RESULTS Among the 553 patients extracted for the study, 81.9% were women, 45.6% were aged ≥ 65 years, and 67.3% had a fracture. The most common fracture site was the spine (39.2%). The overall persistence rate of teriparatide > 12 months was 34.9% (weekly, 23.5%; daily, 43.1%). The subjects with persistence > 12 months comprised a higher proportion of women and they had a higher prevalence of rib and sternum fractures than those with ≤ 12 months. After teriparatide, 38.2% were switched to active vitamin D3, 35.1% to bisphosphonates, and 13.7% to denosumab allowing duplication. However, 34.0% of the patients were not switched to any subsequent medication for osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS Persistence rate over 12 months of teriparatide treatment was 34.9% in Japan. Approximately one-third of patients had no subsequent treatment immediately after teriparatide. Monitoring persistence and considering subsequent drugs for osteoporosis are necessary for teriparatide treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoko Usui
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Masaru Funagoshi
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Kahori Seto
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Kazuki Ide
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.,Center for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Education and Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shiro Tanaka
- Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koji Kawakami
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, Debiais F, Feron JM, Gauvain JB, Guggenbuhl P, Legrand E, Lehr-Drylewicz AM, Lespessailles E, Tremollieres F, Weryha G, Cortet B. 2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2018; 85:519-530. [PMID: 29654947 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To update the 2012 recommendations on pharmacotherapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis, under the aegis of the Bone Task Force of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) and of the Osteoporosis Research and Information Group (GRIO), in collaboration with scientific societies (Collège national des généralistes enseignants, Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français, Fédération nationale des collèges de gynécologie médicale, Groupe d'étude de la ménopause et du vieillissement hormonal, Société française de chirurgie orthopédique, Société française d'endocrinologie, and Société française de gériatrie et de gérontologie). METHODS Updated recommendations were developed by a task force whose members represented the medical specialties involved in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The update was based on a literature review and developed using the method advocated by the French National Authority for Health (HAS). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The updated recommendations place strong emphasis on the treatment of women with severe fractures, in whom the use of osteoporosis medications is recommended. All the available osteoporosis medications are suitable in patients with severe fractures; zoledronic acid deserves preference as the fist-line drug after a hip fracture. In patients with or without non-severe fractures, the decision to use osteoporosis medications is based on bone mineral density values and in challenging cases, on probabilities supplied by prediction tools such as FRAX®. All osteoporosis medications are suitable; raloxifene should be reserved for patients at low risk for peripheral fractures. The fracture risk should be reevaluated every 2 to 3 years to decide on the best follow-up treatment. These updated recommendations discuss the selection of first-line osteoporosis medications and treatment sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Briot
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Cochin, 27, rue de Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Christian Roux
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Cochin, 27, rue de Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Thierry Thomas
- Inserm U1059, service de rhumatologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, 42100 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Hubert Blain
- Unité de soins aigus gériatriques, centre Antonin-Balmes, CHU de Montpellier, université Montpellier 1, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Roland Chapurlat
- Inserm U1033, service de rhumatologie, université de Lyon, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon, France
| | | | - Jean Marc Feron
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique de l'hôpital Saint-Antoine, hôpitaux universitaires Est-Parisiens, 75012 Paris, France
| | | | - Pascal Guggenbuhl
- Inserm U1241, Inra U1341, institut NUMECAN, 35000 Rennes, France; Service de rhumatologie, CHU, hôpital Sud, 35000 Rennes, France; Université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Eric Legrand
- Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | | | | | | | - Georges Weryha
- Service d'endocrinologie, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - Bernard Cortet
- EA 4490, service de rhumatologie, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nakatoh S. Effect of osteoporosis medication on changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers after 24-month administration of daily teriparatide: comparison among minodronate, raloxifene, and eldecalcitol. J Bone Miner Metab 2018; 36:221-228. [PMID: 28293779 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-017-0829-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Accepted: 02/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This study reveals the changes in bone mineral density (BMD), the turnover rate, and the balance [multiple of median formation/multiple of median resorption (MoMf/MoMr)] affected by the selection of different bone resorption inhibitors after 24-month daily teriparatide (20 µg/day) administration. The turnover rate was calculated as √(MoMf2 + MoMr2), where MoMf = bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) value/18.6 and MoMr = tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) value/463. One hundred and twenty-one osteoporotic women (mean age 82.4 years) were randomly administered minodronate (50 mg/28 days), raloxifene (60 mg/day), or eldecalcitol (0.75 µg/day) after teriparatide discontinuation. BMD was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks; BAP values and TRACP-5b were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after administration of bone resorption inhibitors. In the minodronate group, BMD increased significantly from week 0 to weeks 24 and 48. The turnover rate was significantly reduced at week 12, and remained so over the entire course in all three groups. The speed of change of turnover rate was greatest in the minodronate group. The balance in the minodronate group shifted significantly toward formation dominance at week 12 (to 0.97 from 0.87) and then again toward resorption dominance (to 0.84) at week 24. However, no further advancement in resorption dominance was observed until week 48. Conversely, the balance in the raloxifene and eldecalcitol groups shifted toward resorption dominance gradually over the entire course. In conclusion, the BMD-increasing effect was greatest with minodronate administration and depends not only on the decrease in turnover rate but also on changes in balance after teriparatide discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Nakatoh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, 477 Tomari, Asahimachi, Toyama, 939-0741, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|