1
|
Blakeslee B, McCourt ME. Isolation of brightness induction effects on target patches from adjacent surrounds and remote backgrounds. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 16:1082059. [PMID: 36998921 PMCID: PMC10043223 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1082059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The brightness (perceived intensity) of a region of visual space depends on its luminance and on the luminance of nearby regions. This phenomenon is called brightness induction and includes both brightness contrast and assimilation. Historically, and on a purely descriptive level, brightness contrast refers to a directional shift in target brightness away from the brightness of an adjacent region while assimilation refers to a brightness shift toward that of an adjacent region. In order to understand mechanisms, it is important to differentiate the descriptive terms contrast and assimilation from the optical and/or neural processes, often similarly named, which cause the effects. Experiment 1 isolated the effect on target patch (64 cd/m2) matching luminance (brightness) of six surround-ring widths (0.1°–24.5°) varied over 11 surround-ring luminances (32–96 cd/m2). Using the same observers, Experiment 2 examined the effect of the identical surround-ring parameters on target patch matching luminance in the presence of a dark (0.0 cd/m2) and a bright (96 cd/m2) remote background. By differencing the results of Experiment 1 (the isolated effect of the surround-ring) from those of Experiment 2 (the combined effect of the surround-ring with the dark and bright remote background) we further isolated the effect of the remote background. The results reveal that surround-rings and remote backgrounds produce brightness contrast effects in the target patch that are of the same or opposite polarity depending on the luminance polarity of these regions relative to target patch luminance. The strength of brightness contrast from the surround-ring varied with surround-ring luminance and width. Brightness contrast (darkening) in the target from the bright remote background was relatively constant in magnitude across all surround-ring luminances and increased in magnitude with decreasing surround-ring width. Brightness contrast (brightening) from the isolated dark remote background also increased in magnitude with decreasing surround-ring width: however, despite some regional flattening of the functions due to the fixed luminance of the dark remote background, induction magnitude was much reduced in the presence of a surround-ring of greater luminance than the target patch indicating a non-linear interaction between the dark remote background and surround-ring luminance.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rudd ME, Kavcar O, Crognale MA. Parabolic achromatic color matching functions: Dependence on incremental and decremental luminance. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. A, OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION 2023; 40:A57-A64. [PMID: 37133004 PMCID: PMC10156998 DOI: 10.1364/josaa.478694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Either the brightness or lightness of a disk surrounded by an annulus is characterized in the most general case by a parabolic function of the annulus luminance when plotted on a log-log scale. This relationship has been modeled with a theory of achromatic color computation based on edge integration and contrast gain control [J. Vis.10, 1 (2010)1534-736210.1167/10.14.40]. We tested predictions of this model in new psychophysical experiments. Our results support the theory and reveal a previously unobserved property of parabolic matching functions that depends on the disk contrast polarity. We interpret this property in terms of a neural edge integration model incorporating data from macaque monkey physiology that indicates different physiological gain factors for incremental and decremental stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E. Rudd
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
- Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
- Corresponding author:
| | - Osman Kavcar
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
- Graduate Program in Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
| | - Michael A. Crognale
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
- Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rudd ME. Neurocomputational Lightness Model Explains the Appearance of Real Surfaces Viewed Under Gelb Illumination. JOURNAL OF PERCEPTUAL IMAGING 2020; 3:105021-1050216. [PMID: 36968520 PMCID: PMC10038117 DOI: 10.2352/j.percept.imaging.2020.3.1.010502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
One of the primary functions of visual perception is to represent, estimate, and evaluate the properties of material surfaces in the visual environment. One such property is surface color, which can convey important information about ecologically relevant object characteristics such as the ripeness of fruit and the emotional reactions of humans in social interactions. This paper further develops and applies a neural model (Rudd, 2013, 2017) of how the human visual system represents the light/dark dimension of color-known as lightness-and computes the colors of achromatic material surfaces in real-world spatial contexts. Quantitative lightness judgments conducted with real surfaces viewed under Gelb (i.e., spotlight) illumination are analyzed and simulated using the model. According to the model, luminance ratios form the inputs to ON- and OFF-cells, which encode local luminance increments and decrements, respectively. The response properties of these cells are here characterized by physiologically motivated equations in which different parameters are assumed for the two cell types. Under non-saturating conditions, ON-cells respond in proportion to a compressive power law of the local incremental luminance in the image that causes them to respond, while OFF-cells respond linearly to local decremental luminance. ON- and OFF-cell responses to edges are log-transformed at a later stage of neural processing and then integrated across space to compute lightness via an edge integration process that can be viewed as a neurally elaborated version of Land's retinex model (Land & McCann, 1971). It follows from the model assumptions that the perceptual weights-interpreted as neural gain factors-that the model observer applies to steps in log luminance at edges in the edge integration process are determined by the product of a polarity-dependent factor 1-by which incremental steps in log luminance (i.e., edges) are weighted by the value <1.0 and decremental steps are weighted by 1.0-and a distance-dependent factor 2, whose edge weightings are estimated to fit perceptual data. The model accounts quantitatively (to within experimental error) for the following: lightness constancy failures observed when the illumination level on a simultaneous contrast display is changed (Zavagno, Daneyko, & Liu, 2018); the degree of dynamic range compression in the staircase-Gelb paradigm (Cataliotti & Gilchrist, 1995; Zavagno, Annan, & Caputo, 2004); partial releases from compression that occur when the staircase-Gelb papers are reordered (Zavagno, Annan, & Caputo, 2004); and the larger compression release that occurs when the display is surrounded by a white border (Gilchrist & Cataliotti, 1994).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Rudd
- Department of Psychology and Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557-0296
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zavagno D. The Influence of Physical Illumination on Lightness Perception in Simultaneous Contrast Displays. Iperception 2018; 9:2041669518787212. [PMID: 30046432 PMCID: PMC6055112 DOI: 10.1177/2041669518787212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Three experiments investigated the role of physical illumination on lightness perception in simultaneous lightness contrast (SLC). Four configurations were employed: the classic textbook version of the illusion and three configurations that produced either enhanced or reduced SLC. Experiment 1 tested the effect of ambient illumination on lightness perception. It simulated very dark environmental conditions that nevertheless still allowed perception of different shades of gray. Experiment 2 tested the effect of the intensity of Gelb lighting on lightness perception. Experiment 3 presented two conditions that integrated illumination conditions from Experiments 1 and 2. Our results demonstrated an illumination effect on both lightness matching and perceived SLC contrast: As the intensity of illumination increased, the target on the black background appeared lighter, while the target on the white background was little affected. We hypothesize the existence of two illumination ranges that affect lightness perception differently: low and normal. In the low range, the SLC contrast was reduced and targets appeared darker. In the normal range, the SLC contrast and lightness matchings for each background were little changed across illumination intensities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Zavagno
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Retinal Lateral Inhibition Provides the Biological Basis of Long-Range Spatial Induction. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0168963. [PMID: 28030651 PMCID: PMC5193432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Retinal lateral inhibition is one of the conventional efficient coding mechanisms in the visual system that is produced by interneurons that pool signals over a neighborhood of presynaptic feedforward cells and send inhibitory signals back to them. Thus, the receptive-field (RF) of a retinal ganglion cell has a center-surround receptive-field (RF) profile that is classically represented as a difference-of-Gaussian (DOG) adequate for efficient spatial contrast coding. The DOG RF profile has been attributed to produce the psychophysical phenomena of brightness induction, in which the perceived brightness of an object is affected by that of its vicinity, either shifting away from it (brightness contrast) or becoming more similar to it (brightness assimilation) depending on the size of the surfaces surrounding the object. While brightness contrast can be modeled using a DOG with a narrow surround, brightness assimilation requires a wide suppressive surround. Early retinal studies determined that the suppressive surround of a retinal ganglion cell is narrow (< 100–300 μm; ‘classic RF’), which led researchers to postulate that brightness assimilation must originate at some post-retinal, possibly cortical, stage where long-range interactions are feasible. However, more recent studies have reported that the retinal interneurons also exhibit a spatially wide component (> 500–1000 μm). In the current study, we examine the effect of this wide interneuron RF component in two biophysical retinal models and show that for both of the retinal models it explains the long-range effect evidenced in simultaneous brightness induction phenomena and that the spatial extent of this long-range effect of the retinal model responses matches that of perceptual data. These results suggest that the retinal lateral inhibition mechanism alone can regulate local as well as long-range spatial induction through the narrow and wide RF components of retinal interneurons, arguing against the existing view that spatial induction is operated by two separate local vs. long-range mechanisms.
Collapse
|
6
|
The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks. Behav Res Methods 2015; 48:306-12. [PMID: 25761392 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.
Collapse
|
7
|
Domijan D. A Neurocomputational account of the role of contour facilitation in brightness perception. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9:93. [PMID: 25745396 PMCID: PMC4333805 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
A new filling-in model is proposed in order to account for challenging brightness illusions, where inducing background elements are spatially separated from the gray target such as dungeon, cube and grating illusions, bullseye display and ring patterns. This model implements the simple idea that neural response to low-contrast contour is enhanced (facilitated) by the presence of collinear or parallel high-contrast contours in its wider neighborhood. Contour facilitation is achieved via dendritic inhibition, which enables the computation of maximum function among inputs to the node. Recurrent application of maximum function leads to the propagation of the neural signal along collinear or parallel contour segments. When a strong global-contour signal is accompanied with a weak local-contour signal at the same location, conditions are met to produce brightness assimilation within the Filling-in Layer. Computer simulations showed that the model correctly predicts brightness appearance in all of the aforementioned illusions as well as in White's effect, Benary's cross, Todorović's illusion, checkerboard contrast, contrast-contrast illusion and various variations of the White's effect. The proposed model offers new insights on how geometric factors (contour colinearity or parallelism), together with contrast magnitude contribute to the brightness perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dražen Domijan
- Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daneyko O, Zavagno D, Stucchi N. The size illusion and lightness contrast effect in Delboeuf-like displays: possible evidence of percept-percept coupling. Perception 2014; 43:705-10. [PMID: 25223113 DOI: 10.1068/p7677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
We conducted two experiments to test the relationship between Delboeuf's size-contrast illusion and a concomitant lightness contrast effect that can be observed when achromatic disks are employed as targets. In experiment 1 participants were asked to adjust the diameter of a target (D1) surrounded by a small circular size-inducer (C1) to match in size a comparison target (D2) surrounded by a circular size-inducer (C2) either equal or greater in diameter than C1. Experiment 2 was similar to experiment 1, except that D1 and D2 were physically equal in size, and participants were asked to adjust the luminance of D1 to match D2 in lightness. Results confirm an effect of the difference in diameter between C1 and C2 on the magnitude of the size illusion but not on the magnitude of the lightness effect, the emergence of which is linked to the appearance of the size illusion. Results support a percept-percept coupling relationship.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rudd ME. A cortical edge-integration model of object-based lightness computation that explains effects of spatial context and individual differences. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8:640. [PMID: 25202253 PMCID: PMC4141467 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous work has demonstrated that perceived surface reflectance (lightness) can be modeled in simple contexts in a quantitatively exact way by assuming that the visual system first extracts information about local, directed steps in log luminance, then spatially integrates these steps along paths through the image to compute lightness (Rudd and Zemach, 2004, 2005, 2007). This method of computing lightness is called edge integration. Recent evidence (Rudd, 2013) suggests that human vision employs a default strategy to integrate luminance steps only along paths from a common background region to the targets whose lightness is computed. This implies a role for gestalt grouping in edge-based lightness computation. Rudd (2010) further showed the perceptual weights applied to edges in lightness computation can be influenced by the observer's interpretation of luminance steps as resulting from either spatial variation in surface reflectance or illumination. This implies a role for top-down factors in any edge-based model of lightness (Rudd and Zemach, 2005). Here, I show how the separate influences of grouping and attention on lightness can be modeled in tandem by a cortical mechanism that first employs top-down signals to spatially select regions of interest for lightness computation. An object-based network computation, involving neurons that code for border-ownership, then automatically sets the neural gains applied to edge signals surviving the earlier spatial selection stage. Only the borders that survive both processing stages are spatially integrated to compute lightness. The model assumptions are consistent with those of the cortical lightness model presented earlier by Rudd (2010, 2013), and with neurophysiological data indicating extraction of local edge information in V1, network computations to establish figure-ground relations and border ownership in V2, and edge integration to encode lightness and darkness signals in V4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Rudd
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhuang X, Cao D. Contrast magnitude and polarity effects on color filling-in along cardinal color axes. J Vis 2013; 13:19. [PMID: 23814074 DOI: 10.1167/13.7.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Color filling-in is the phenomenon in which the color of a visual area is perceived as the color that is only presented in an adjacent area. In a stimulus with multiple edges, color filling-in can occur along any edge and in both centripetal and centrifugal directions when maintaining steady fixation. The current study aimed to investigate the role of chromatic contrast magnitude and polarity along the two chromaticity cardinal axes and the interaction of the axes in the color filling-in process. In Experiment 1, the color filling-in process was examined using stimuli with three different regions and two edges. The three regions had chromaticities that varied only in one of the chromaticity axes. In Experiment 2, the regions along both edges differed in chromaticity along both axes. The results showed that the contrast magnitudes and polarity relationship of the two edges worked together to determine the filled-in direction and time course of the filled-in percepts. Further, the results pointed to a common mechanism mediating the color filling-in process along the two cardinal axes, and the two axes did not act independently in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohua Zhuang
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vladusich T. A reinterpretation of transparency perception in terms of gamut relativity. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. A, OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION 2013; 30:418-426. [PMID: 23456117 DOI: 10.1364/josaa.30.000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Classical approaches to transparency perception assume that transparency constitutes a perceptual dimension corresponding to the physical dimension of transmittance. Here I present an alternative theory, termed gamut relativity, that naturally explains key aspects of transparency perception. Rather than being computed as values along a perceptual dimension corresponding to transmittance, gamut relativity postulates that transparency is built directly into the fabric of the visual system's representation of surface color. The theory, originally developed to explain properties of brightness and lightness perception, proposes how the relativity of the achromatic color gamut in a perceptual blackness-whiteness space underlies the representation of foreground and background surface layers. Whereas brightness and lightness perception were previously reanalyzed in terms of the relativity of the achromatic color gamut with respect to illumination level, transparency perception is here reinterpreted in terms of relativity with respect to physical transmittance. The relativity of the achromatic color gamut thus emerges as a fundamental computational principle underlying surface perception. A duality theorem relates the definition of transparency provided in gamut relativity with the classical definition underlying the physical blending models of computer graphics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Vladusich
- Institute for Telecommunications Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Simultaneous contrast and gamut relativity in achromatic color perception. Vision Res 2012; 69:49-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2011] [Revised: 07/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
13
|
ZAVAGNO DANIELE, DANEYKO OLGA, SAKURAI KENZO. What can pictorial artifacts teach us about light and lightness?1. JAPANESE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2011. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00488.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
14
|
Daneyko O, Zavagno D, Zanuttini L. Lightness effects in Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus size-contrast illusions. Perception 2011; 40:464-73. [PMID: 21805921 DOI: 10.1068/p6622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
We examined lightness effects observed in Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus size-contrast illusions. Results of four experiments are reported. Experiment 1 was conducted with Delboeuf-like stimuli and shows that the disk that appears bigger appears either lighter or darker than the disk that appears smaller, depending on the contrast polarity between disks and background. Experiment 2 shows that the direction of these lightness effects is not influenced by the luminance of the size-contrast inducers. Experiment 3 shows that a similar lightness effect is also observed in modified Ebbinghaus size-contrast displays. Experiment 4 tested the presence of the size-contrast illusion in the stimuli used in experiments 2 and 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Daneyko
- Department of Psychology, University of Trieste, via S Anastasio 12, I 34134 Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lightness, brightness and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy. Vision Res 2010; 51:652-73. [PMID: 20858514 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2010] [Revised: 09/03/2010] [Accepted: 09/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The past quarter century has witnessed considerable advances in our understanding of Lightness (perceived reflectance), Brightness (perceived luminance) and perceived Transparency (LBT). This review poses eight major conceptual questions that have engaged researchers during this period, and considers to what extent they have been answered. The questions concern 1. the relationship between lightness, brightness and perceived non-uniform illumination, 2. the brain site for lightness and brightness perception, 3 the effects of context on lightness and brightness, 4. the relationship between brightness and contrast for simple patch-background stimuli, 5. brightness "filling-in", 6. lightness anchoring, 7. the conditions for perceptual transparency, and 8. the perceptual representation of transparency. The discussion of progress on major conceptual questions inevitably requires an evaluation of which approaches to LBT are likely and which are unlikely to bear fruit in the long term, and which issues remain unresolved. It is concluded that the most promising developments in LBT are (a) models of brightness coding based on multi-scale filtering combined with contrast normalization, (b) the idea that the visual system decomposes the image into "layers" of reflectance, illumination and transparency, (c) that an understanding of image statistics is important to an understanding of lightness errors, (d) Whittle's logW metric for contrast-brightness, (e) the idea that "filling-in" is mediated by low spatial frequencies rather than neural spreading, and (f) that there exist multiple cues for identifying non-uniform illumination and transparency. Unresolved issues include how relative lightness values are anchored to produce absolute lightness values, and the perceptual representation of transparency. Bridging the gap between multi-scale filtering and layer decomposition approaches to LBT is a major task for future research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kramer P, Bressan P. Paradoxical lightness contrast. Vision Res 2009; 50:144-8. [PMID: 19896960 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2009] [Revised: 10/12/2009] [Accepted: 11/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The visual system's computation of lightness (perceived reflectance) leads to contrast effects in which a gray target region appears lighter on a black background than on a white one. Here we show a paradoxical contrast effect in which targets look lighter after adding regions that increase the scene's average luminance, and darker after adding regions that decrease this luminance. The paradoxical effect emerges if the target sits either on a black local background surrounded by a white remote background, or on a white local background surrounded by a black remote background. It does not occur if both backgrounds have the same luminance. The effect is consistent with Bressan's double-anchoring theory, and likely also with those edge-integration theories that assume gain control, but differs from previously reported effects of assimilation, articulation, reverse contrast, and remote contrast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kramer
- Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Metacontrast masking and the cortical representation of surface color: dynamical aspects of edge integration and contrast gain control. Adv Cogn Psychol 2008; 3:327-47. [PMID: 20517518 PMCID: PMC2864963 DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0034-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2006] [Accepted: 09/30/2006] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reviews recent theoretical and experimental work supporting the idea
that brightness is computed in a series of neural stages involving edge
integration and contrast gain control. It is proposed here that metacontrast and
paracontrast masking occur as byproducts of the dynamical properties of these
neural mechanisms. The brightness computation model assumes, more specifically,
that early visual neurons in the retina, and cortical areas V1 and V2, encode
local edge signals whose magnitudes are proportional to the logarithms of the
luminance ratios at luminance edges within the retinal image. These local edge
signals give rise to secondary neural lightness and darkness spatial induction
signals, which are summed at a later stage of cortical processing to produce a
neural representation of surface color, or achromatic color, in the case of the
chromatically neutral stimuli considered here. Prior to the spatial summation of
these edge-based induction signals, the weights assigned to local edge contrast
are adjusted by cortical gain mechanisms involving both lateral interactions
between neural edge detectors and top-down attentional control. We have
previously constructed and computer-simulated a neural model of achromatic color
perception based on these principles and have shown that our model gives a good
quantitative account of the results of several brightness matching experiments.
Adding to this model the realistic dynamical assumptions that 1) the neurons
that encode local contrast exhibit transient firing rate enhancement at the
onset of an edge, and 2) that the effects of contrast gain control take time to
spread between edges, results in a dynamic model of brightness computation that
predicts the existence Broca-Sulzer transient brightness enhancement of the
target, Type B metacontrast masking, and a form of paracontrast masking in which
the target brightness is enhanced when the mask precedes the target in time.
Collapse
|