Influence of surround proximity on induction of brown and darkness

Perception of brown with variation in center chromaticity and surround luminance

Brown is a contrast color that depends on complex combinations of chromatic and achromatic signals. We measured brown perception with variations in chromaticity and luminance in center-surround configurations. In Experiment 1, the dominant wavelength and saturation in terms of S-cone stimulation were tested with five observers in a fixed surround luminance (60c d/m ²). A paired-comparison task required the observer to select the better exemplar of brown in one of two, simultaneously presented, stimuli (1.0° center diameter; annulus of 9.48° outer-diameter). In Experiment 2, the same task was tested with five observers in which surround luminance was varied (from 13.1 to 99.6c d/m ²) for two center chromaticities. The results were a set of win-loss ratios for each stimulus combination and converted to Z-scores. An ANOVA did not reveal a significant main effect of the observer factor but revealed a significant interaction with red/green (a ^∗) [but not with the dominant wavelength and the S-cone stimulation (or b ^∗)]. Experiment 2 revealed observer variation in interactions with surround luminance and S-cone stimulation. The averaged data plotted in 1976 L ^∗ a ^∗ b ^∗ color space indicate that high Z-score values widely distribute in the area of a ^∗ from 5 to 28 and b ^∗ over 6. The balance of the strength between yellowness and blackness differs among observers owing to the amount of induced blackness required for the best brown.

Invariant categorical color regions across illuminant change coincide with focal colors

Are there regions in a color space where color categories are invariant across illuminant changes? If so, what characteristics make them more stable than other regions? To address these questions, we asked observers to give a color name to 424 colored surfaces, presented one at a time, under various chromatic illuminants. Results showed a high degree of categorical color constancy, especially under illuminants that occur in the natural environment. It was also shown that surfaces selected as a focal color (the best example of a color category) are more resistant to illuminant change than nonfocal color samples. We additionally ran an asymmetric color matching experiment to quantify the shift of color appearance induced by illuminant changes using surfaces that were all named gray, thereby disentangling the appearance-based color constancy from the categorical color constancy (which are often confounded). Results suggested that the appearance of color samples largely shifted owing to illuminant changes, even though all samples were named gray; showing that the constancy of a color category is substantially more robust than the constancy of color appearance.

Relative contributions of melanopsin to brightness discrimination when hue and luminance also vary

A large number of studies have shown the effect of melanopsin-dependent retinal ganglion cells on humans performing brightness discrimination tasks. These studies often utilized targets that only differ in their melanopsin activation levels, and not in their luminance or hue, which are both factors that make large contributions to brightness discrimination. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative contribution of melanopsin activation to brightness discrimination when luminance and hue are also varying in addition to melanopsin activation. Using an apparatus consisting of three separate high luminance projectors, we were able to manipulate melanopsin-isolating stimulation, and L-, M-, and S-cone stimulation separately, thus allowing us to vary stimuli in their melanopsin activation, luminance, and hue category independently. We constructed three sets of target stimuli with three different levels of melanopsin activation (100%, 131%, and 167% relative melanopsin excitation) and five levels of luminance. We then had subjects do a two-alternative forced choice task where they compared the previously described target stimuli set to a set of four comparison stimuli that varied in their hue category but had identical luminances. We found that in our stimuli set the overall contribution of melanopsin activity to brightness discrimination was small (an average of 6% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus) when luminance and hue also varied. However, a significant interaction showed that when the comparison was between stimuli differing only in melanopsin stimulation (with luminance and hue unchanged) the contribution of melanopsin to brightness judgments was about 3 times larger (an average of 18% increase in likelihood to call a high melanopsin activity stimulus brighter compared to a low melanopsin activity stimulus). This suggests that although luminance and hue have large effects on brightness discrimination such that the melanopsin contribution can become hard to detect, when there are minimal cone-dependent signals available, melanopsin can make a large contribution to brightness discrimination.

Contrast-dependent red-green balance shifts depend on S-cone activity

Previous research from our lab has established that red-green-balanced yellow targets become greenish-brown as surround luminance increases, while red-green-balanced brown targets become reddish-yellow as surround luminance decreases. To help assess the generality and underlying processes of this contrast-dependent red-green hue shift, we investigated red-green hue shifts for target stimuli that appeared achromatic or blue as well as yellow/brown. Results confirmed that the red-green hue shift was largest for yellow/brown targets and was progressively reduced for achromatic and blue targets as target excitation of S cones increased. The magnitude of the hue shift could be predicted by the S/(L+M) excitation of the target when bright white surrounds are used. The hue shift also requires that the target and surround are presented to the same eye, consistent with processing in monocular pathways. Increased S-cone excitation by the surround was associated with red-green hue shifts for all targets equally. Thus, S-cone signals from bright white surrounds might play a role in the contrast-dependent red-green hue shift, but the source of the variation of the magnitude of the hue shift with variations in target S-cone excitation when presented on those surrounds is unknown.

Contrast-dependent red-green hue shift

On bright surrounds, red-green-balanced yellow targets become greenish brown with decreased target luminance, and red-green-balanced brown targets become reddish yellow with increased target luminance. These effects imply luminance- and/or contrast-dependent weighting of M- and L-cone signals in post-receptoral pathways. We show psychophysically that luminance contrast between the surround and the target is the primary determinant of the magnitude of red-green hue shift, requiring surround luminance at least twice the target luminance and increasing with further increases of surround/target contrast. There is a much smaller effect of absolute stimulus luminance, with dimmer stimuli showing slightly larger hue shifts. To evaluate a possible retinal origin of the changes in cone-signal weightings underlying the hue shift, we recorded spike responses from both ON- and OFF-center midget ganglion cells in peripheral primate retina. We found no evidence that the relative strength of L- and M-cone post-receptoral responses changed systematically with change of surround irradiance. Nor was there any systematic difference between ON- and OFF-subtypes. This suggests that the change in cone signal weighting occurs later in the visual system.

Coral reef fish perceive lightness illusions

Visual illusions occur when information from images are perceived differently from the actual physical properties of the stimulus in terms of brightness, size, colour and/or motion. Illusions are therefore important tools for sensory perception research and from an ecological perspective, relevant for visually guided animals viewing signals in heterogeneous environments. Here, we tested whether fish perceived a lightness cube illusion in which identical coloured targets appear (for humans) to return different spectral outputs depending on the apparent amount of illumination they are perceived to be under. Triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus) were trained to peck at coloured targets to receive food rewards, and were shown to experience similar shifts in colour perception when targets were placed in illusory shadows. Fish therefore appear to experience similar simultaneous contrast mechanisms to humans, even when targets are embedded in complex, scene-type illusions. Studies such as these help unlock the fundamental principles of visual system mechanisms.

Dichoptic perception of brown

Two experiments assessed mechanisms underlying brown induction by presenting a foveal target disk and concentric annular surround stimuli that varied in contrast relative to larger backgrounds. Stimuli were presented under monocular, binocular, and dichoptic viewing conditions. Observers adjusted the luminance of the target disk to a criterion brown level. We found evidence for at least two separate mechanisms for brown induction: one mechanism that is dependent on physically contiguous contrast and operates in monocular pathways and another mechanism that responds to high luminance contrast anywhere in the visual field and can operate after convergence of signals from the two eyes.

Luminance-dependent long-term chromatic adaptation

There is theoretical and empirical support for long-term adaptation of human vision to chromatic regularities in the environment. The current study investigates whether relationships of luminance and chromaticity in the natural environment could drive chromatic adaptation independently and differently for bright and dark colors. This is motivated by psychophysical evidence of systematic difference shifts in red-green chromatic sensitivities between contextually bright- versus dark-colored stimuli. For some broad classes of scene content, consistent shifts in chromaticity are found between high and low light levels within images. Especially in those images in which sky and terrain are juxtaposed, this shift has direction and magnitude consistent with the observed psychophysical shifts in the red-green balance between bright and dark colors. Taken together, these findings suggest that relative weighting of M- and L-cone signals could be adapted, in a luminance-dependent fashion, to regularities in the natural environment.