1
|
Mack DP, Greenhawt M, Bukstein DA, Golden DBK, Settipane RA, Davis RS. Decisions With Patients, Not for Patients: Shared Decision-Making in Allergy and Immunology. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024:S2213-2198(24)00577-4. [PMID: 38851489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is an increasingly implemented patient-centered approach to navigating patient preferences regarding diagnostic and treatment options and supported decision-making. This therapeutic approach prioritizes the patient's perspectives, considering current medical evidence to provide a balanced approach to clinical scenarios. In light of numerous recent guideline recommendations that are conditional in nature and are clinical scenarios defined by preference-sensitive care options, there is a tremendous opportunity for SDM and validated decision aids. Despite the expansion of the literature on SDM, formal acceptance among clinicians remains inconsistent. Surprisingly, a significant disparity exists between clinicians' self-reported adherence to SDM principles and patients' perceptions of its implementation during clinical encounters. This discrepancy underscores a fundamental issue in the delivery of health care, where clinicians may overestimate their integration of SDM, while patients' experiences suggest otherwise. This review critically examines the factors contributing to this inconsistency, including barriers within the health care system, clinician attitudes and behaviors, and patient expectations and preferences. By elucidating these factors in the fields of food allergy, asthma, eosinophilic esophagitis, and other allergic diseases, this review aims to provide insights into bridging the gap between clinician perception and patient experience in SDM. Addressing this discordance is crucial for advancing patient-centered care and ensuring that SDM is not merely a theoretical concept but a tangible reality in the.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas P Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Don A Bukstein
- The Inner City Milwaukee Clinic, Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Center, Milwaukee, Wisc
| | - David B K Golden
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md
| | - Russell A Settipane
- Department of Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ray S Davis
- Division of Allergy Immunology & Pulmonary Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luck CC, Bass SB, Chertock Y, Kelly PJA, Singley K, Hoadley A, Hall MJ. Understanding perceptions of tumor genomic profile testing in Black/African American cancer patients in a qualitative study: the role of medical mistrust, provider communication, and family support. J Community Genet 2024; 15:281-292. [PMID: 38366313 PMCID: PMC11217212 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00700-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) examines genes and somatic mutations specific to a patient's tumor to identify targets for cancer treatments but can also uncover secondary hereditary (germline) mutations. Most patients are unprepared to make complex decisions related to this information. Black/African American (AA) cancer patients are especially at risk because of lower health literacy, higher levels of medical mistrust, and lower awareness and knowledge of genetic testing. But little is known about their TGP attitudes or preferences. Five in-person focus groups were conducted with Black/AA cancer patients (N = 33) from an NCI-designated cancer center and an affiliated oncology unit in an urban safety-net hospital located in Philadelphia. Focus groups explored participants' understanding of TGP, cultural beliefs about genetics, medical mistrust, and how these perceptions informed decision-making. Participants were mostly female (81.8%), and one-third had some college education; mean age was 57 with a SD of 11.35. Of patients, 33.3% reported never having heard of TGP, and 48.5% were not aware of having had TGP as part of their cancer treatment. Qualitative analysis was guided by the principles of applied thematic analysis and yielded five themes: (1) mistrust of medical institutions spurring independent health-information seeking; (2) genetic testing results as both empowering and overwhelming; (3) how provider-patient communication can obviate medical mistrust; (4) how unsupportive patient-family communication undermines interest in secondary-hereditary risk communication; and (5) importance of developing centralized patient support systems outside of treatment decisions. Results improve understanding of how Black/AA patients perceive of TGP and how interventions can be developed to assist with making informed decisions about secondary hereditary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caseem C Luck
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| | - Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Yana Chertock
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Patrick J A Kelly
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Katie Singley
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Ariel Hoadley
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coylewright M, Otero D, Lindman BR, Levack MM, Horne A, Ngo LH, Beaudry M, Col HV, Col NF. An interactive, online decision aid assessing patient goals and preferences for treatment of aortic stenosis to support physician-led shared decision-making: Early feasibility pilot study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302378. [PMID: 38771808 PMCID: PMC11108138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend shared decision making when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis but implementation has lagged. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a novel decision aid for severe aortic stenosis at point-of-care. METHODS This prospective multi-site pilot cohort study included adults with severe aortic stenosis and their clinicians. Patients were referred by their heart team when scheduled to discuss treatment options. Outcomes included shared decision-making processes, communication quality, decision-making confidence, decisional conflict, knowledge, stage of decision making, decision quality, and perceptions of the tool. Patients were assessed at baseline (T0), after using the intervention (T1), and after the clinical encounter (T2); clinicians were assessed at T2. Before the encounter, patients reviewed the intervention, Aortic Valve Improved Treatment Approaches (AVITA), an interactive, online decision aid. AVITA presents options, frames decisions, clarifies patient goals and values, and generates a summary to use with clinicians during the encounter. RESULTS 30 patients (9 women [30.0%]; mean [SD] age 70.4 years [11.0]) and 14 clinicians (4 women [28.6%], 7 cardiothoracic surgeons [50%]) comprised 28 clinical encounters Most patients [85.7%] and clinicians [84.6%] endorsed AVITA. Patients reported AVITA easy to use [89.3%] and helped them choose treatment [95.5%]. Clinicians reported the AVITA summary helped them understand their patients' values [80.8%] and make values-aligned recommendations [61.5%]. Patient knowledge significantly improved at T1 and T2 (p = 0.004). Decisional conflict, decision-making stage, and decision quality improved at T2 (p = 0.0001, 0.0005, and 0.083, respectively). Most patients [60%] changed treatment preference between T0 and T2. Initial treatment preferences were associated with low knowledge, high decisional conflict, and poor decision quality; final preferences were associated with high knowledge, low conflict, and high quality. CONCLUSIONS AVITA was endorsed by patients and clinicians, easy to use, improved shared decision-making quality and helped patients and clinicians arrive at a treatment that reflected patients' values. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial ID: NCT04755426, Clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Coylewright
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine-Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Diana Otero
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Brian R. Lindman
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Melissa M. Levack
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Aaron Horne
- Department of Medicine, Summit Health, Berkeley Heights, NJ, United States of America
| | - Long H. Ngo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Melissa Beaudry
- Central Vermont Medical Center, Berlin, Vermont, United States of America
| | - Hannah V. Col
- Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Nananda F. Col
- Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richardson BT, Jackson J, Marable G, Barker J, Gardiner H, Igarabuza L, Leasy M, Matthews E, Zisman-Ilani Y. The Role of Black Churches in Promoting Mental Health for Communities of Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Black Americans. Psychiatr Serv 2024:appips20230263. [PMID: 38595118 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Churches in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods serve as safe havens in many Black communities. Churches provide faith and charitable services but often have limited resources to address the mental health needs of their communities. This article reports on a collaborative effort, driven by members of a Black church, to understand mental health needs, coping strategies, and resilience factors in a community of socioeconomically disadvantaged Black Americans. METHODS A community-based participatory research effort was established among a church, a community mental health organization, clinicians, and researchers to interview and survey individuals residing near the church. RESULTS The sample consisted of 59 adults, most of whom were ages 46-65 years, men (N=34, 58%), and unemployed (N=46, 78%). Mean scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (9.2±7.7) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (9.4±6.7) were almost three times higher than those reported by studies of other Black populations in the United States. Five themes emerged: prolonged poverty and daily exposure to violence trigger emotional distress, mental health stigma affects help seeking, spirituality promotes mental relief and personal recovery, spirituality helps in coping with poverty and unsafe neighborhoods, and church-based programs are needed. CONCLUSIONS Uptake of traditional mental health services was low, and reliance on faith and resource distribution by the church was high. Church-led interventions are needed to promote mental health at the individual and community levels. Mental health stigma, and negative attitudes toward mental health promotion in the community, may be addressed by integrating traditional mental health services in church-based recreational and leisure activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana T Richardson
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Jacqueline Jackson
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Grace Marable
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Jessica Barker
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Heather Gardiner
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Laura Igarabuza
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Menachem Leasy
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Elizabeth Matthews
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| | - Yaara Zisman-Ilani
- Office of Community-Engaged Research and Practice (Richardson, Barker, Gardiner) and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Gardiner, Zisman-Ilani), College of Public Health, and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine (Igarabuza, Leasy), Temple University, Philadelphia; Bethel Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia (Jackson, Marable); Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City (Matthews); Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London (Zisman-Ilani)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karlin D, Pham C, Furukawa D, Kaur I, Martin E, Kates O, Vijayan T. State-of-the-Art Review: Use of Antimicrobials at the End of Life. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:e27-e36. [PMID: 38301076 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Navigating antibiotics at the end of life is a challenge for infectious disease (ID) physicians who remain deeply committed to providing patient-centered care and engaging in shared decision making. ID physicians, who often see patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings and maintain continuity of care for patients with refractory or recurrent infections, are ideally situated to provide guidance that aligns with patients' goals and values. Complex communication skills, including navigating difficult emotions around end-of-life care, can be used to better direct shared decision making and assist with antibiotic stewardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Karlin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christine Pham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daisuke Furukawa
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Ishminder Kaur
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Emily Martin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Olivia Kates
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tara Vijayan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zagt AC, Bos N, Bakker M, de Boer D, Friele RD, de Jong JD. A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 118:108030. [PMID: 37897867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In order to improve the degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by patients, it is necessary to gain insight into the explanations for the differences in these degrees. METHODS A scoping review of the literature on the explanations for differences in the degree of SDM experienced by patients was conducted. We assessed 21,329 references. Ultimately, 308 studies were included. The explanations were divided into micro, meso, and macro levels. RESULTS The explanations are mainly related to the micro level. They include explanations related to the patient and healthcare professionals, the relationship between the patient and the physician, and the involvement of the patient's relatives. On the macro level, explanations are related to restrictions within the healthcare system such as time constraints, and adequate information about treatment options. On the meso level, explanations are related to the continuity of care and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS SDM is not an isolated process between the physician and patient. Explanations are connected to the macro, meso, and micro levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This scoping review suggests that there could be more focus on explanations related to the macro and meso levels, and on how explanations at different levels are interrelated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Zagt
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Nanne Bos
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dolf de Boer
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roland D Friele
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; Tranzo Scientifc Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|