1
|
Zagt AC, Bos N, Bakker M, de Boer D, Friele RD, de Jong JD. A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 118:108030. [PMID: 37897867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In order to improve the degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by patients, it is necessary to gain insight into the explanations for the differences in these degrees. METHODS A scoping review of the literature on the explanations for differences in the degree of SDM experienced by patients was conducted. We assessed 21,329 references. Ultimately, 308 studies were included. The explanations were divided into micro, meso, and macro levels. RESULTS The explanations are mainly related to the micro level. They include explanations related to the patient and healthcare professionals, the relationship between the patient and the physician, and the involvement of the patient's relatives. On the macro level, explanations are related to restrictions within the healthcare system such as time constraints, and adequate information about treatment options. On the meso level, explanations are related to the continuity of care and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS SDM is not an isolated process between the physician and patient. Explanations are connected to the macro, meso, and micro levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This scoping review suggests that there could be more focus on explanations related to the macro and meso levels, and on how explanations at different levels are interrelated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Zagt
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Nanne Bos
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dolf de Boer
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roland D Friele
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; Tranzo Scientifc Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Hulst FJP, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. How is enrollees' trust in health insurers associated with choosing health insurance? PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292964. [PMID: 37917768 PMCID: PMC10621964 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In a healthcare system based on managed competition, health insurers are intended to be the prudent buyers of care on behalf of their enrollees. Equally, citizens are expected to be critical consumers when choosing a health insurance policy. The choice of a health insurance policy may be related to trust in the health insurer, as enrollees must believe that the health insurer will make the right choices for them when it comes to purchasing care. This study aims to investigate how enrollees' trust in health insurers is associated with their choice of a health insurance policy in the Netherlands. We will focus on the switching behaviour of enrollees and the choice of a policy with restrictive conditions. In February 2022, a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample regarding gender and age of the adult Dutch population. In total 1,125 enrollees responded, a response rate of 56%. Respondents were asked about the choices they made in choosing health insurance. Trust in health insurers was measured using the Health Insurer Trust Scale (HITS), a validated multiple item scale. Descriptive statistics, a paired t-test and logistic regression models were conducted to analyse the results. Of all respondents, 35% indicated that they agree, or completely agree, with the statement that they trust health insurers completely. In addition, trust in enrollees' own insurer is slightly higher than trust in other insurers (36.29 vs. 33.59, p<0.001). Furthermore, we found no significant associations between trust in health insurers, and whether enrollees have either switched health insurers or have chosen a policy with restrictive conditions. This study showed that enrollees' trust in health insurance in the Netherlands is relatively low and that trust in their own insurer is slightly higher than trust in other insurers. Furthermore, this study does not show a relationship between trust in health insurers and, either switching health insurers, or choosing a policy with restrictive conditions. Nevertheless, attention for increasing the trust in health insurers might still be important, as low trust may have negative consequences for other elements of the functioning of the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel, The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Nivel, The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meijer MA, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291530. [PMID: 37708164 PMCID: PMC10501638 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards solidarity-based systems. The high willingness to contribute to the healthcare costs of others in the Netherlands suggests that support is generally high. However, there are differences between groups. Previous research has focused on mechanisms at the individual and institutional level to explain these differences. However, people's social context may also play a role. Little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we examined the role of perceived social support and social norms in order to explain differences in the willingness to contribute to other people's healthcare costs. In November 2021, we conducted a survey study in which a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1,500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. This was returned by 837 panel members (56% response rate). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that people who perceive higher levels of social support are more willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. We also found that the willingness to contribute is higher when someone's social context is more supportive of healthcare systems that are financed according to the principles of solidarity. This effect does not differ between people who perceive low and high levels of social support. Our results suggest that, next to the individual and institutional level, the social context of people has to be taken into consideration in policy and research addressing support for solidarity in healthcare financing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes A. Meijer
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Offerhaus P, van Haaren-Ten Haken TM, Keulen JKJ, de Jong JD, Brabers AEM, Verhoeven CJM, Scheepers HCJ, Nieuwenhuijze M. Regional practice variation in induction of labor in the Netherlands: Does it matter? A multilevel analysis of the association between induction rates and perinatal and maternal outcomes. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286863. [PMID: 37289749 PMCID: PMC10249899 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice variation in healthcare is a complex issue. We focused on practice variation in induction of labor between maternity care networks in the Netherlands. These collaborations of hospitals and midwifery practices are jointly responsible for providing high-quality maternity care. We explored the association between induction rates and maternal and perinatal outcomes. METHODS In a retrospective population-based cohort study, we included records of 184,422 women who had a singleton, vertex birth of their first child after a gestation of at least 37 weeks in the years 2016-2018. We calculated induction rates for each maternity care network. We divided networks in induction rate categories: lowest (Q1), moderate (Q2-3) and highest quartile (Q4). We explored the association of these categories with unplanned caesarean sections, unfavorable maternal outcomes and adverse perinatal outcomes using descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression analysis corrected for population characteristics. FINDINGS The induction rate ranged from 14.3% to 41.1% (mean 24.4%, SD 5.3). Women in Q1 had fewer unplanned caesarean sections (Q1: 10.2%, Q2-3: 12.1%; Q4: 12.8%), less unfavorable maternal outcomes (Q1: 33.8%; Q2-3: 35.7%; Q4: 36.3%) and less adverse perinatal outcomes (Q1: 1.0%; Q2-3: 1.1%; Q4: 1.3%). The multilevel analysis showed a lower unplanned caesarean section rate in Q1 in comparison with reference category Q2-3 (OR 0.83; p = .009). The unplanned caesarean section rate in Q4 was similar to the reference category. No significant associations with unfavorable maternal or adverse perinatal outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION Practice variation in labor induction is high in Dutch maternity care networks, with limited association with maternal outcomes and no association with perinatal outcomes. Networks with low induction rates had lower unplanned caesarean section rates compared to networks with moderate rates. Further in-depth research is necessary to understand the mechanisms that contribute to practice variation and the observed association with unplanned caesarean sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pien Offerhaus
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judit K. J. Keulen
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Nivel–Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel–Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Corine J. M. Verhoeven
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, Inholland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Division of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hubertina C. J. Scheepers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meijer MA, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. Has public support for solidarity in healthcare financing in the Netherlands changed over time? A repeated cross-sectional study. Health Policy 2023; 131:104762. [PMID: 36933452 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
It is argued that solidarity-based healthcare systems are under pressure and that public support is decreasing. It can, therefore, be expected that support for solidarity in healthcare financing has diminished over time. However, little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we used survey data from 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, and 2021 to examine changes in public support for solidarity in healthcare financing in the Netherlands over time. This was operationalised as the own willingness and the expected willingness of others to contribute to other people's healthcare costs. Using logistic regression analysis, we found that the own willingness to contribute has slightly increased among the general population over time, although this was not observed in all subgroups. No change in the expected willingness of others to contribute was observed. Our results suggest that the willingness to contribute to other people's healthcare costs has, at least, not decreased over time. A majority of the Dutch population remains willing to share the burden of healthcare costs, indicating support for the principles of the solidarity-based healthcare system. However, not all people are willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. In addition, we do not know how much people want to pay. Further research into these topics is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes A Meijer
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, the Netherlands; Maastricht University. Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Hulst FJP, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. The relation between trust and the willingness of enrollees to receive healthcare advice from their health insurer. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:52. [PMID: 36653840 PMCID: PMC9850786 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-09016-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a healthcare system based on managed competition, it is important that health insurers are able to channel enrollees to preferred providers. This results in incentives for healthcare providers to improve the quality and reduce the price of care. One of the instruments to guide enrollees to preferred providers is by providing healthcare advice. In order to use healthcare advice as an effective instrument, it is important that enrollees accept the health insurer as a healthcare advisor. As trust in health insurers is not high, this may be an obstacle for enrollees to be receptive to the health insurer's advice. This study aims to investigate the association between trust in the health insurer and the willingness to receive healthcare advice from the health insurer in the Netherlands. In terms of receiving healthcare advice, we examine both enrollees' willingness to approach the health insurer themselves and their willingness to be approached by the health insurer. METHODS In February 2021, a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of the Dutch population. The questionnaire was completed by 885 respondents (response rate 59%). Respondents were asked about their willingness to receive healthcare advice, and trust in the health insurer was measured using a validated multiple item scale. Logistic regression models were conducted to analyse the results. RESULTS Enrollees with more trust in the health insurer were more willing to approach their health insurer for healthcare advice (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00). In addition, a higher level of trust in the health insurer is significantly associated with the odds that enrollees would like it/really appreciate it if their health insurer actively approached them with healthcare advice (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00). The role of trust in the willingness to receive healthcare advice is not proven to differ between groups with regard to educational levels, health status or age. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that trust plays a role in the willingness to receive healthcare advice from the health insurer. The association between the two emphasizes the importance to increase enrollees' trust in the health insurer. As a result, health insurers may be better able to fulfil their role as healthcare advisor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank J. P. van der Hulst
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- grid.416005.60000 0001 0681 4687Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tichler A, Hertroijs DFL, Ruwaard D, Brouwers MCGJ, Hiligsmann M, de Jong JD, Elissen AMJ. Preferred Conversation Topics with Respect to Treatment Decisions Among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:719-729. [PMID: 36960182 PMCID: PMC10029372 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s397647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Greater knowledge of individuals' needs and preferences can enhance shared decision-making, which is associated with improved quality of decisions and increased satisfaction. This study aimed to identify and prioritize the attributes (ie conversation topics) that individuals with type 2 diabetes find it most important to discuss with their healthcare provider regarding treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS First, small group interviews were organized with adults with type 2 diabetes (N=8) treated in primary care to identify the attributes that they find important to discuss regarding treatment decisions. A five-step nominal group technique was applied during the interviews. An object best-worst scaling (BWS) survey was subsequently distributed to individuals with self-reported diabetes participating in the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel of the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (N=600) to determine the relative importance score (RIS) of the identified attributes. A higher RIS indicates a higher level of perceived importance. Subgroup and latent class analyses were performed to explore whether individuals' demographic and disease characteristics influenced their attribute preferences. RESULTS A total of 21 attributes were identified during three small group interviews with individuals with type 2 diabetes. Respondents in the BWS survey (N=285) viewed "quality of life" (RIS=11.97), "clinical outcomes" (RIS=10.40), "long-term diabetes complications" (RIS=9.83) and "short-term adverse medication" (RIS=7.72) as the most important in the decision-making process for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Some differences in attribute preferences were identified according to demographic and disease characteristics. CONCLUSION In general, individuals with type 2 diabetes not only want to discuss the biological effects of treatments, but also the impact of treatment on their quality of life. Healthcare providers should be aware that attributes are viewed differently by different individuals. This emphasizes the need for tailor-made healthcare decisions, which means eliciting and responding to individual preferences in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Tichler
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Anna Tichler, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, the Netherlands, Tel +31433882193, Email
| | - Dorijn F L Hertroijs
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Ruwaard
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn C G J Brouwers
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Disease, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arianne M J Elissen
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schwenke M, van Dorst J, Zwakhalen S, de Jong JD, Brabers AM, Bleijenberg N. Measures to improve patient needs assessments and reduce practice variation in Dutch home care organizations. Nurs Open 2022; 10:3052-3063. [PMID: 36504333 PMCID: PMC10077383 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Worldwide, long-term care tends to shift from institutional care towards home care. In order to deliver high-quality and adequate care, the type, amount and cost of care is determined by a patient needs assessment. However, there are indications that this patient needs assessment varies between comparable patients. In the Netherlands, some home care organizations aim to improve patient needs assessments by implementing improvement measures to reduce this practice variation. The goal of this study was to explore the type and perceived impact of those implemented improvement measures. DESIGN A cross-sectional explorative survey study was conducted among Dutch home care organizations between January and April 2021. METHODS An online questionnaire with 26 items was developed by the research team, which was distributed through Dutch nationwide home care sector organizations, the Dutch nurses' association (V&VN) and the Dutch society for home care nursing (NWG). RESULTS The survey was completed by 184 respondents, including home care nurses, managers and staff who are responsible for training, policy and quality of care. Intervision and peer review for home care nurses were the most common reported improvement measures that were implemented in home care organizations. The experiences of those improvement measures have been perceived as creating greater uniformity in the patient needs assessment, making home care nurses feel more supported and secure performing their patient needs assessment and that the provided care is more in line with patients' demand. Our findings give insights into type and perceived impact of improvement measures that Dutch home care organizations implemented. Further research is needed to find out whether improvement measures actually improve patient needs assessments and reduce practice variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Schwenke
- Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - José van Dorst
- Department of Health Services Research Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Zwakhalen
- Department of Health Services Research Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Department of Health Services Research Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute Maastricht The Netherlands
- Nivel – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Bleijenberg
- Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holst L, Rademakers JJDJM, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. Measuring health insurance literacy in the Netherlands - First results of the HILM-NL questionnaire. Health Policy 2022; 126:1157-1162. [PMID: 36180280 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several indications that citizens in the Netherlands struggle to make critical, well-considered decisions about which insurance policy best fits their needs and preferences. This can lead to citizens being sub-optimally insured, facing unexpected costs or suffering inadequate coverage. This study aims to examine how health insurance literacy (HIL) is distributed among citizens in the Netherlands; and to find out whether there are certain groups who have more difficulty choosing and using a health insurance policy. METHODS We measured health insurance literacy using the HILM-NL questionnaire, the validated Dutch version of the original health insurance literacy measure (HILM). In February 2020, the HILM-NL was sent to 1,500 members of the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel. The response rate was 54% (806). RESULTS There is a wide variation in HIL among citizens in the Netherlands. The average total HILM-NL score is 55.14 (on a range of 21-84). The level of education and the household net income are significantly related to HIL. CONCLUSIONS Citizens who completed less education or earn a lower income are relatively more likely to have difficulty choosing a health insurance policy or using policy benefits to pay for health services once enrolled. It is important to support these vulnerable groups properly in their choice and use of a health insurance policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens Holst
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, Utrecht 3500 BN, the Netherlands.
| | - Jany J D J M Rademakers
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, Utrecht 3500 BN, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, Utrecht 3500 BN, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, Utrecht 3500 BN, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rademaker MM, Stegeman I, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD, Stokroos RJ, Smit AL. Associations between Demographics, Tinnitus Specific-, Audiological-, General- and Mental Health Factors, and the Impact of Tinnitus on Daily Life. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154590. [PMID: 35956204 PMCID: PMC9369461 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to study associations between demographics, tinnitus specific-, audiological-, general- and mental health characteristics, and impact of tinnitus in the general population. In this cross-sectional survey study in the Dutch population, data were prospectively gathered. Tinnitus impact was assessed with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). We included participants who experienced tinnitus and for whom a total TFI score could be calculated (n = 212). We performed univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Due to logarithmical transformation, the B-scores were back-transformed to show the actual difference in points on the TFI. People who considered hyperacusis a small problem had a 12.5-point higher TFI score, those who considered it a mediocre problem had a 17.6-point higher TFI score and those who considered it a large problem had a 24.1-point higher TFI score compared to people who did not consider hyperacusis a problem. People who indicated having minor hearing problems had a 10.5-point higher TFI score, those with mediocre hearing problems had a 20.4-point higher TFI score and those with severe hearing problems had a 41.6-point higher TFI score compared to people who did not have subjective hearing problems. In conclusion, audiological risk factors, such as hearing problems and hyperacusis, have the largest association with the impact of tinnitus on daily life, compared to other assessed variables. The results of this study can be used in future research to find targeted interventions to diminish the impact of tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike M. Rademaker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Nivel-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana L. Smit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holst L, Rademakers JJDJM, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. The Importance of Choosing a Health Insurance Policy and the Ability to Comprehend That Choice for Citizens in the Netherlands. Health Lit Res Pract 2021; 5:e288-e294. [PMID: 34756120 PMCID: PMC8582231 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20211010-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In a health insurance system based on managed competition, such as in the Netherlands, it is important that all citizens can make well-informed decisions on which policy fits their needs and preferences best. However, partly due to the large variety of health insurance policies, there are indications that a significant group of citizens do not make rational decisions when choosing a policy. Objective: This study aimed to provide more insight into (1) how important it is for citizens in the Netherlands to choose a health insurance policy and (2) how easy it is for them to comprehend the information they receive. Methods: Data were collected by sending a survey to members of the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in February 2017. The response rate was 44% (N = 659). Key Results: Our results indicate that citizens in the Netherlands acknowledge the importance of choosing a health insurance policy, but they also point out that it is difficult to comprehend health insurance information. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a section of the citizens do not have the appropriate skills to decide which insurance policy best fits their needs and preferences. Having better insight into their level of health insurance literacy is an important step in the process of evaluating the extent to which citizens can fulfill their role in the health insurance system. Our results suggest that it is important to better tailor information on health insurances to the specific needs and skills of the individual. By doing this, citizens will be better supported in making well-informed decisions regarding health insurance policies, which should have a positive effect on the functioning of the Dutch health insurance system. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(4):e287–e294.] Plain Language Summary: The number of health insurance policy options to choose from is extensive in the Netherlands. This study explored to what extent citizens in the Netherlands find it important to choose a health insurance policy, and to what extent they comprehend the information they receive. The data were collected in 2017 using the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens Holst
- Address correspondence to Laurens Holst, MSc, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands;
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rademaker MM, Smit AL, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman I. Using Different Cutoffs to Define Tinnitus and Assess Its Prevalence-A Survey in the Dutch General Population. Front Neurol 2021; 12:690192. [PMID: 34456849 PMCID: PMC8386349 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.690192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Tinnitus prevalence numbers in the literature range between 5 and 43%, depending on the studied population and definition. It is unclear when tinnitus becomes pathologic. Objectives: To assess the tinnitus prevalence in the Dutch general population with different cutoffs for definition. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was sent to a sample (n = 2,251) of the Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel. Three questions were asked to assess the presence of tinnitus, duration, and frequency of the complaint. We classified people as having pathologic tinnitus when participants experienced it for 5-60 min (daily or almost daily or weekly), or tinnitus for >60 min or continuously (daily or almost daily or weekly or monthly), so tinnitus impact on daily life was measured with the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and a single-item question. Answers were stratified to mid-decade years of age. Prevalence numbers were weighted by gender and age to match the Dutch population. Results: Nine hundred thirty-two of 2,251 participants (41%) filled out the questionnaire. The median age was 67.0 (IQR 17) years. Three hundred thirty-eight of 932 (36%) experienced tinnitus for an undefined amount of time during the last year. Two hundred sixteen of 932 (23%) met our definition of having pathologic tinnitus (21% when weighted for age and gender). The median TFI score for all pathologic tinnitus participants was 16.6 (IQR 21.8). A percentage of 50.4% of the pathologic tinnitus participants had a TFI in the range 0-17, which can be interpreted as not a problem. Conclusion: Twenty-three percent (unweighted) or 21% (weighted) of our sample met our definition of pathologic tinnitus, which was based on a combination of duration and frequency over the last year. The TFI score of 47.7% of the pathologic tinnitus participants is ≥18. This indicates that they consider the tinnitus to be at least "a small problem" [11.1% (unweighted) or 8.9% (weighted) of the total study group]. This study illustrates the difficulties with defining pathologic tinnitus. In addition, it demonstrates that tinnitus prevalence numbers vary with different definitions and, consequently, stresses the importance of using a uniform definition of tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike M Rademaker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adriana L Smit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pokhilenko I, van Esch TEM, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. Relationship between trust and patient involvement in medical decision-making: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256698. [PMID: 34437626 PMCID: PMC8389380 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients vary in their preferences regarding involvement in medical decision-making. Current research does not provide complete explanation for this observed variation. Patient involvement in medical decision-making has been found to be influenced by various mechanisms, one of which could be patients’ trust in physicians. The aim of this study was to examine whether trust in physicians fosters or impairs patient involvement in medical decision-making. This study also aimed to determine to what extent the relationship between trust and preferences regarding decision-making roles was influenced by the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients. We hypothesised that trust can both foster and impair patient involvement in medical decision-making. Materials and methods A survey was sent out to members of the Nivel Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in February 2016 (response rate = 47%, N = 703). The Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale was used to measure trust. Patient involvement was measured using two items based on the study published by Flynn and colleagues in 2006. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyse the relationship between trust and patient involvement. Results We found a negative relationship between trust and patient involvement in medical decision-making in men. Women with high trust reported to be more involved in medical decision-making compared to men with high trust. Conclusion The results suggest that trust impairs involvement in medical decision-making for men but not for women. Further research could provide a more comprehensive explanation of the variation in patient preferences regarding involvement in medical decision-making to further elucidate which underlying mechanisms could enhance patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Pokhilenko
- Faculty of Health, Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Thamar E. M. van Esch
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E. M. Brabers
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- Faculty of Health, Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Vries M, Claassen L, Te Wierik MJM, van den Hof S, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD, Timmermans DRM, Timen A. Dynamic Public Perceptions of the Coronavirus Disease Crisis, the Netherlands, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27:1098-1109. [PMID: 33493429 PMCID: PMC8007322 DOI: 10.3201/eid2704.203328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A key component of outbreak control is monitoring public perceptions and public response. To determine public perceptions and public responses during the first 3 months of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in the Netherlands, we conducted 6 repeated surveys of ≈3,000 persons. Generalized estimating equations analyses revealed changes over time as well as differences between groups at low and high risk. Overall, respondents perceived the risks associated with COVID-19 to be considerable, were positive about the mitigation measures, trusted the information and the measures from authorities, and adopted protective measures. Substantial increases were observed in risk perceptions and self-reported protective behavior in the first weeks of the outbreak. Individual differences were based mainly on participants’ age and health condition. We recommend that authorities constantly adjust their COVID-19 communication and mitigation strategies to fit public perceptions and public responses and that they tailor the information for different groups.
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Schors W, Brabers AEM, de Jong JD. Why do people not switch insurer in a market-based health insurance market? Empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30:633-638. [PMID: 32236545 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In market-based systems, the possibility to switch is an important precondition for a well-functioning health insurance market. To assess whether such a market works as intended, insight into the considerations and perceived barriers of insured is needed. This study examines the rates and reasons for not switching health insurer in the Netherlands, and whether these reasons differ between the general population and the population of people with a chronic illness. METHODS We made use of survey data collected in 2017 among two panels representing the general population (n = 659, response 44%) and the chronically ill population (n = 1593, response 86%). RESULTS We found differences regarding the reasons for not switching insurer. The chronically ill population seems to attach more importance to reasons related to the coverage of the health plan, whereas the general population is more focused on the level of service. Some people who considered switching experienced barriers, however, these barriers were not significantly more experienced by the chronically ill population. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals differences between the general population and the chronically ill population when examining reasons for not switching related to quality and coverage. A subset from the people who initially considered to switch experienced barriers which might have altered their decision. Further research is recommended to include questions about information search behaviour to examine which consumers make an informed decision for not switching, and for whom barriers limit switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter van der Schors
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Potappel AJC, Meijers MC, Kloek C, Victoor A, Noordman J, Olde Hartman T, van Dulmen S, de Jong JD. To what degree do patients actively choose their healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP? A video observation study. BMC Fam Pract 2019; 20:166. [PMID: 31787107 PMCID: PMC6885306 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1060-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Many countries in Europe have implemented managed competition and patient choice during the last decade. With the introduction of managed competition, health insurers also became an important stakeholder. They purchase services on behalf of their customers and are allowed to contract healthcare providers selectively. It has, therefore, become increasingly important to take one’s insurance into account when choosing a provider. There is little evidence that patients make active choices in the way that policymakers assume they do. This research aims to investigate, firstly, the role of patients in choosing a healthcare provider at the point of referral, then the role of the GP and, finally, the influence of the health insurer/insurance policies within this process. Methods We videotaped a series of everyday consultations between Dutch GPs and their patients during 2015 and 2016. In 117 of these consultations, with 28 GPs, the patient was referred to another healthcare provider. These consultations were coded by three observers using an observation protocol which assessed the role of the patient, GP, and the influence of the health insurer during the referral. Results Patients were divided into three groups: patients with little or no input, patients with some input, and those with a lot of input. Just over half of the patients (56%) seemed to have some, or a lot of, input into the choice of a healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP. In addition, in almost half of the consultations (47%), GPs inquired about their patients’ preferences regarding a healthcare provider. Topics regarding the health insurance or insurance policy of a patient were rarely (14%) discussed at the point of referral. Conclusions Just over half of the patients appear to have some, or a lot of, input into their choice of a healthcare provider at the point of referral by their GP. However, the remainder of the patients had little or no input. If more patient choice continues to be an important aim for policy makers, patients should be encouraged to actively choose the healthcare provider who best fits their needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J C Potappel
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maartje C Meijers
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Corelien Kloek
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Aafke Victoor
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Olde Hartman
- Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Maastricht University, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Esch TEM, Brabers AEM, Hek K, van Dijk L, Verheij RA, de Jong JD. Does shared decision-making reduce antibiotic prescribing in primary care? J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 73:3199-3205. [PMID: 30165644 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increasing antibiotic resistance is recognized as a major threat to global health and is related to antibiotic prescription rates in primary care. Shared decision-making (SDM), the process in which patients and doctors participate together in making decisions, is argued to possibly promote more appropriate use of antibiotics and reduce prescribing. However, it is unknown whether in practice fewer antibiotics are prescribed where more SDM takes place. Objectives To investigate whether more SDM is related to less antibiotic prescribing and whether this relationship differs between subgroups of patients (male/female and age groups). Patients and methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2670 members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel to measure SDM (response rate 45%). Average practice-level SDM scores were calculated for 15 general practices. Data from routine electronic health records of 8192 adult patients of these general practices participating in the Nivel Primary Care Database were used to assess relevant illness episodes (acute cough, acute rhinosinusitis and urinary tract infection), the indication for antibiotics and antibiotic prescriptions. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between practice-level SDM and patient-level antibiotic prescriptions. Results In practices where more SDM takes place, general practitioners prescribed fewer antibiotics for adult patients under the age of 40 years in preference-sensitive situations (i.e. situations in which antibiotics could be considered according to clinical guidelines). Conclusions SDM can be a framework to reduce the prescribing of antibiotics and thus to control antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thamar E M van Esch
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Hek
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Verheij
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Health Services Research Maastricht University, MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Trust is seen as an important condition for the smooth functioning of institutions, such as the health care system. In this article we describe the trust relationships between the three main actors in the Dutch health care system: patients/insured, healthcare providers and insurers. We used data from different surveys between 2006 and 2016. 2006 was the year of the introduction of an insurance reform in the Netherlands towards regulated competition. In the triangle of trust relationships between the three actors we found strong and mutual trust relationships between patients and healthcare providers and weak trust relationships between healthcare providers and insurers as well as between insured and insurance organisations. This hampers the intended role of insurers as selective purchasers of health care on the basis of quality and price.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research and Department of Sociology, Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Johan Hansen
- NIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research and Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bes RE, Curfs EC, Groenewegen PP, de Jong JD. Advice from the health insurer as a channelling strategy: a natural experiment at a Dutch health insurance company. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:832. [PMID: 30400978 PMCID: PMC6219118 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3624-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a health care system based on managed competition it is important that health insurers are able to channel their enrolees to preferred care providers. However, enrolees are often very negative about financial incentives and any limitations in their choice of care provider. Therefore, a Dutch health insurance company conducted an experiment to study the effectiveness of a new method of channelling their enrolees. This method entails giving enrolees advise on which physiotherapists to choose when they call customer service. Offering this advice as an extra service is supposed to improve service quality ratings. Objective of this study is to evaluate this channelling method on effectiveness and the impact on service quality ratings. METHODS In this experiment, one of the health insurer's customer service call teams (pilot team) began advising enrolees on their choice of physiotherapist. Three data sources were used. Firstly, all enrolees who called customer service received an online questionnaire in order to measure their evaluation of the quality of service. Enrolees who were offered advice received a slightly different questionnaire which, in addition, asked about whether they intended to follow the advice they were offered. Multilevel regression analysis was conducted to analyse the difference in service quality ratings between the pilot team and two comparable customer service teams before and after the implementation of the channelling method. Secondly, employees logged each call, registering, if they offered advice, whether the enrolee accepted it, and if so, which care provider was advised. Thirdly, data from the insurance claims were used to see if enrolees visited the recommended physiotherapist. RESULTS The results of the questionnaire show that enrolees responded favorably to being offered advice on the choice of physiotherapist. Furthermore, 45% of enrolees who received advice and then went on to visit a care provider, followed the advice. The service quality ratings were higher compared to control groups. However, it could not be determined whether this effect was entirely due to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Channelling enrolees towards preferred care providers by offering advice on their choice of care provider when they call customer service is successful. The effect on service quality seems positive, although a causal relationship could not be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy E. Bes
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emile C. Curfs
- Open University, Valkenburgerweg 177, 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P. Groenewegen
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D. de Jong
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Otterstraat 118-124, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heins MJ, de Jong JD, Spronk I, Ho VKY, Brink M, Korevaar JC. Adherence to cancer treatment guidelines: influence of general and cancer-specific guideline characteristics. Eur J Public Health 2018; 27:616-620. [PMID: 28013246 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guideline adherence remains a challenge in clinical practice, despite guidelines' ascribed potential to improve patient outcomes. We studied the level of adherence to recommendations from Dutch national cancer treatment guidelines, and the influence of general and cancer-specific guideline characteristics on adherence. Methods Based on data from a national cancer registry, adherence was evaluated for 15 treatment recommendations for breast, colorectal, prostate and lung cancer, and melanoma. Recommendations were selected by representatives of the medical specialist associations responsible for developing and implementing the guidelines. We used multivariable multilevel analysis to calculate mean adherence and variation between individual hospitals. Results Mean adherence to the different treatment recommendations ranged from 40 to 99%. Adherence differed only slightly between older and newer guidelines and between recommendations with low, moderate or high levels of evidence (range 79-84% and 77-91%, respectively), while adherence differed more between recommendations for different cancer types (range 54-99%), different treatment modalities (adherence ranged from 40 to 92%) or recommendations that advised against or recommended in favour of particular treatment (adherence ranged from 75 to 98%). Conclusion We found significant variation in adherence between different cancer treatment guidelines. While some guideline characteristics that seem to explain this variation may be considered difficult to modify, the potential for variance across cancer types and treatment modalities suggests that adherence could be further improved. At the same time, these results warrant tailored strategies for the improvement of adherence to clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne J Heins
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Spronk
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent K Y Ho
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirian Brink
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joke C Korevaar
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lemmens LC, Delwel GO, Hoefman RJ, de Jong JD, Weda M. [The conversation with the patient is essential for good pharmacotherapeutic care]. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 49:56-59. [PMID: 29411319 DOI: 10.1007/s12439-018-0247-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Frail elderly with polypharmacy are at greater risk of preventable medication-related health damage. To improve medication safety, the healthcare field prepared, in consultation with the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, a number of guidelines and standards containing conditions for safe prescribing. According to these standards the active involvement of patients by health care professionals is essential for good pharmacotherapeutic care. However, two studies with patients show that there is still room for improvement. According to patients, they can be (even) better informed about changes in their medication. Also the caregivers could communicate more clearly who is the central contact point and who is ultimately responsible for the medication. Patients are not sufficiently informed on this. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about how and why medication reviews are performed. More explanation to patients about this is desirable. In addition, patients experience that keeping their medication list up to date and transferring medication data between health care providers could be improved. Finally, a group of patients welcomes the opportunity to co-decide on changes in their medication. In order to prescribe safely, it is crucial that caregivers actively involve patients in pharmacotherapeutic care and really enter into conversation with them about their medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidwien C Lemmens
- Centrum Voeding, Preventie en Zorg, Rijkinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven, Nederland
| | | | - Renske J Hoefman
- Instituut Beleid en Management Gezondheidszorg, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Nederland
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg, Utrecht, Nederland
| | - Marjolein Weda
- Centrum Gezondheidsbescherming, Rijkinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Postbus 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, Nederland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bes RE, Curfs EC, Groenewegen PP, de Jong JD. Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review. Health Policy 2017; 121:504-514. [PMID: 28381338 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Huygens MWJ, Swinkels ICS, de Jong JD, Heijmans MJWM, Friele RD, van Schayck OCP, de Witte LP. Self-monitoring of health data by patients with a chronic disease: does disease controllability matter? BMC Fam Pract 2017; 18:40. [PMID: 28320330 PMCID: PMC5360032 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0615-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing emphasis on self-monitoring applications that allow patients to measure their own physical health parameters. A prerequisite for achieving positive effects is patients' willingness to self-monitor. The controllability of disease types, patients' perceived self-efficacy and health problems could play an essential role in this. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between patients' willingness to self-monitor and a range of disease and patient specific variables including controllability of disease type, patients' perceived self-efficacy and health problems. METHODS Data regarding 627 participants with 17 chronic somatic disease types from a Dutch panel of people with chronic diseases have been used for this cross-sectional study. Perceived self-efficacy was assessed using the general self-efficacy scale, perceived health problems using the Physical Health Composite Score (PCS). Participants indicated their willingness to self-monitor. An expert panel assessed for 17 chronic disease types the extent to which patients can independently keep their disease in control. Logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Patients' willingness to self-monitor differs greatly among disease types: patients with diabetes (71.0%), asthma (59.6%) and hypertension (59.1%) were most willing to self-monitor. In contrast, patients with rheumatism (40.0%), migraine (41.2%) and other neurological disorders (42.9%) were less willing to self-monitor. It seems that there might be a relationship between disease controllability scores and patients' willingness to self-monitor. No evidence is found of a relationship between general self-efficacy and PCS scores, and patients' willingness to self-monitor. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first evidence that patients' willingness to self-monitor might be associated with disease controllability. Further research should investigate this association more deeply and should focus on how disease controllability influences willingness to self-monitor. In addition, since willingness to self-monitor differed greatly among patient groups, it should be taken into account that not all patient groups are willing to self-monitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine W J Huygens
- Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Centre for Care Technology Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ilse C S Swinkels
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Centre for Care Technology Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J W M Heijmans
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roland D Friele
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tranzo, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Centre for Care Technology Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Centre for Care Technology Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc P de Witte
- Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Research Center Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 550, 6400 AN, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare (CATCH), University of Sheffield, 217 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.,Centre for Care Technology Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Esch TEM, Brabers AEM, van Dijk CE, Gusdorf L, Groenewegen PP, de Jong JD. Increased cost sharing and changes in noncompliance with specialty referrals in The Netherlands. Health Policy 2016; 121:180-188. [PMID: 27989512 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The compulsory deductible, a form of patient cost-sharing in the Netherlands, has more than doubled during the past years. There are indications that as a result, refraining from medical care has increased. We studied the relation between patient cost-sharing and refraining from medical care by evaluating noncompliance with referrals to medical specialists over several years. METHODS Noncompliance with specialty referrals was assessed in the Netherlands from 2008 until 2013, using routinely recorded referrals from general practitioners to medical specialists and claims from medical specialists to health insurers. Associations with patient characteristics were estimated using multilevel logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Noncompliance rates were approximately stable from 2008 to 2010 and increased from 18% in 2010 to 27% in 2013. Noncompliance was highest in adults aged 25-39 years. The increase was highest in children and patients with chronic diseases. No significantly higher increase among patients from urban deprived areas was found. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Noncompliance increased during the rise of the compulsory deductible. Our results do not suggest a one-to-one relationship between increased patient cost-sharing and noncompliance with specialty referrals. In order to develop effective policy for reducing noncompliance, it is advisable to focus on the mechanisms for noncompliance in the groups with the highest noncompliance rates (young adults) and with the highest increase in noncompliance (children and patients with chronic diseases).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thamar E M van Esch
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne E M Brabers
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christel E van Dijk
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Department of Sociology, Department of Human Geography, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Bloemendal E, Damman OC, de Jong JD, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ. Patients' Need for Tailored Comparative Health Care Information: A Qualitative Study on Choosing a Hospital. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e297. [PMID: 27895006 PMCID: PMC5153531 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Internet is increasingly being used to provide patients with information about the quality of care of different health care providers. Although online comparative health care information is widely available internationally, and patients have been shown to be interested in this information, its effect on patients' decision making is still limited. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore patients' preferences regarding information presentation and their values concerning tailored comparative health care information. Meeting patients' information presentation needs might increase the perceived relevance and use of the information. METHODS A total of 38 people participated in 4 focus groups. Comparative health care information about hip and knee replacement surgery was used as a case example. One part of the interview focused on patients' information presentation preferences, whereas the other part focused on patients' values of tailored information (ie, showing reviews of patients with comparable demographics). The qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS The following themes were deduced from the transcripts: number of health care providers to be presented, order in which providers are presented, relevancy of tailoring patient reviews, and concerns about tailoring. Participants' preferences differed concerning how many and in which order health care providers must be presented. Most participants had no interest in patient reviews that were shown for specific subgroups based on age, gender, or ethnicity. Concerns of tailoring were related to the representativeness of results and the complexity of information. A need for information about the medical specialist when choosing a hospital was stressed by several participants. CONCLUSIONS The preferences for how comparative health care information should be presented differ between people. "Information on demand" and information about the medical specialist might be promising ways to increase the relevancy and use of online comparative health care information. Future research should focus on how different groups of people use comparative health care information for different health care choices in real life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Hendriks
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Evelien Bloemendal
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Olga C Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Diana Mj Delnoij
- Quality Institute, National Health Care Institute, Diemen, Netherlands
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Jany Jd Rademakers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brabers AEM, de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, van Dijk L. Social support plays a role in the attitude that people have towards taking an active role in medical decision-making. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:502. [PMID: 27655113 PMCID: PMC5031318 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1767-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing emphasis towards including patients in medical decision-making. However, not all patients are actively involved in such decisions. Research has so far focused mainly on the influence of patient characteristics on preferences for active involvement. However, it can be argued that a patient’s social context has to be taken into account as well, because social norms and resources affect behaviour. This study aims to examine the role of social resources, in the form of the availability of informational and emotional support, on the attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making. Methods A questionnaire was sent to members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel (response 70 %; n = 1300) in June 2013. A regression model was then used to estimate the relation between medical and lay informational support and emotional support and the attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making. Results Availability of emotional support is positively related to the attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making only in people with a low level of education, not in persons with a middle and high level of education. The latter have a more positive attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making, irrespective of the level of emotional support available. People with better access to medical informational support have a more positive attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making; but no significant association was found for lay informational support. Conclusions This study shows that social resources are associated with the attitude towards taking an active role in medical decision-making. Strategies aimed at increasing patient involvement have to address this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E M Brabers
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brabers AEM, van Dijk L, Groenewegen PP, de Jong JD. Do social norms play a role in explaining involvement in medical decision-making? Eur J Public Health 2016; 26:901-905. [PMID: 27161909 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients' involvement in medical decision-making is crucial to provide good quality of care that is respectful of, and responsive to, patients' preferences, needs and values. Whether people want to be involved in medical decision-making is associated with individual patient characteristics, and health status. However, the observation of differences in whether people want to be involved does not in itself provide an explanation. Insight is necessary into mechanisms that explain people's involvement. This study aims to examine one mechanism, namely social norms. We make a distinction between subjective norms, that is doing what others think one ought to do, and descriptive norms, doing what others do. We focus on self-reported involvement in medical decision-making. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in May 2015 (response 46%; N = 974). A regression model was used to estimate the relationship between socio-demographics, social norms and involvement in medical decision-making. RESULTS In line with our hypotheses, we observed that the more conservative social norms are, the less people are involved in medical decision-making. The effects for both types of norms were comparable. CONCLUSION This study indicates that social norms play a role as a mechanism to explain involvement in medical decision-making. Our study offers a first insight into the possibility that the decision to be involved in medical decision-making is not as individual as it at first seems; someone's social context also plays a role. Strategies aimed at emphasizing patient involvement have to address this social context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E M Brabers
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Sociology, Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brabers AEM, van Dijk L, Groenewegen PP, van Peperstraten AM, de Jong JD. Does a strategy to promote shared decision-making reduce medical practice variation in the choice of either single or double embryo transfer after in vitro fertilisation? A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010894. [PMID: 27154481 PMCID: PMC4861095 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The hypothesis that shared decision-making (SDM) reduces medical practice variations is increasingly common, but no evidence is available. We aimed to elaborate further on this, and to perform a first exploratory analysis to examine this hypothesis. This analysis, based on a limited data set, examined how SDM is associated with variation in the choice of single embryo transfer (SET) or double embryo transfer (DET) after in vitro fertilisation (IVF). We examined variation between and within hospitals. DESIGN A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING 5 hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 222 couples (woman aged <40 years) on a waiting list for a first IVF cycle, who could choose between SET and DET (ie, ≥2 embryos available). INTERVENTION SDM via a multifaceted strategy aimed to empower couples in deciding how many embryos should be transferred. The strategy consisted of decision aid, support of IVF nurse and the offer of reimbursement for an extra treatment cycle. Control group received standard IVF care. OUTCOME MEASURE Difference in variation due to SDM in the choice of SET or DET, both between and within hospitals. RESULTS There was large variation in the choice of SET or DET between hospitals in the control group. Lower variation between hospitals was observed in the group with SDM. Within most hospitals, variation in the choice of SET or DET appeared to increase due to SDM. Variation particularly increased in hospitals where mainly DET was chosen in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Although based on a limited data set, our study gives a first insight that including patients' preferences through SDM results in less variation between hospitals, and indicates another pattern of variation within hospitals. Variation that results from patient preferences could be potentially named the informed patient rate. Our results provide the starting point for further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00315029; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E M Brabers
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arno M van Peperstraten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Dijk CE, de Jong JD, Verheij RA, Jansen T, Korevaar JC, de Bakker DH. Compliance with referrals to medical specialist care: patient and general practice determinants: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2016; 17:11. [PMID: 26831125 PMCID: PMC4736608 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0401-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Background In a gatekeeper system, primary care physicians and patients jointly decide whether or not medical specialist care is needed. However, it is the patient who decides to actually use the referral. Referral non-compliance could delay diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to assess patient compliance with a referral to medical specialist care and identify patient and practice characteristics that are associated with it. Methods Observational study using data on 48,784 referrals to medical specialist care derived from electronic medical records of 58 general practices for the period 2008–2010. Referral compliance was based on claims data of medical specialist care. Logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between patient and general practice characteristics and referral compliance. Results In 86.6 % of the referrals, patients complied. Patient and not practice characteristics were significantly associated with compliance. Patients from deprived urban areas and patients aged 18–44 years were less likely to comply, whereas patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to comply. Conclusion About 1 in 8 patients do not use their referral. These patients may not receive adequate care. Demographic and socio-economic factors appear to affect compliance. The results of this study may be used to make general practitioners more aware that some patients are more likely to be noncompliant with referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christel E van Dijk
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert A Verheij
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Tessa Jansen
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Joke C Korevaar
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Dinny H de Bakker
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O.Box 1568, , 3500 BN,, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Huygens MW, Vermeulen J, Friele RD, van Schayck OC, de Jong JD, de Witte LP. Internet Services for Communicating With the General Practice: Barely Noticed and Used by Patients. Interact J Med Res 2015; 4:e21. [PMID: 26601596 PMCID: PMC4704911 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.4245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2015] [Revised: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 07/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Netherlands is one of the frontrunners of eHealth in Europe. Many general practices offer Internet services, which can be used by patients to communicate with their general practice. In promoting and implementing such services, it is important to gain insight into patients’ actual use and intention toward using. Objective The objective of the study is to investigate the actual use and intention toward using Internet services to communicate with the general practice by the general practice population. The secondary objective is to study the factors and characteristics that influence their intention to use such services. Methods There were 1500 members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel, age over 18 years, that were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. People who had contacted their general practitioner at least once in the past year were included. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire about the following services: Internet appointment planning, asking questions on the Internet, email reminders about appointments, Internet prescription refill requests, Internet access to medical data, and Internet video consultation. Participants indicated whether they had used these services in the past year, they would like to use them, and whether they thought their general practice had these services. For the first two services, participants rated items based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology complemented with additional constructs. These items were divided into six subscales: effort expectancy, performance expectancy, trust, attitude, facilitating conditions, and social influence. Results There were 546 participants that were included in the analyses out of 593 who met the inclusion criteria. The participants had a mean age of 53 years (SD 15.4), 43.6% (n=238) were male, and 66.8% (n=365) had at least one chronic illness. Actual use of the services varied between 0% (n=0, video consultation) and 10.4% (n=57, requesting prescription refill by Internet). The proportion of participants with a positive intention to use the service varied between 14.7% (n=80, video consultation) and 48.7% (n=266, Internet access to medical data). For each service, approximately half indicated that they did not know whether the service was available. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that all the constructs as well as age, level of education, and Internet usage had a significant association with intention toward using Internet appointment planning and asking questions by Internet. Conclusions Internet communication services to contact the general practice are not yet frequently used by this population. Although a substantial number of persons have a positive intention toward using such services, not all people who receive primary care seem willing to use them. The lack of awareness of the availability and functionality of such services might play an important role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Wj Huygens
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bouwman R, Bomhoff M, de Jong JD, Robben P, Friele R. The public's voice about healthcare quality regulation policies. A population-based survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:325. [PMID: 26272506 PMCID: PMC4536787 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0992-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the wake of various high-profile incidents in a number of countries, regulators of healthcare quality have been criticised for their ‘soft’ approach. In politics, concerns were expressed about public confidence. It was claimed that there are discrepancies between public opinions related to values and the values guiding regulation policies. Although the general public are final clients of regulators’ work, their opinion has only been discussed in research to a limited extent. The aim of this study is to explore possible discrepancies between public values and opinions and current healthcare quality regulation policies. Methods A questionnaire was submitted to 1500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. Questions were developed around central ideas underlying healthcare quality regulation policies. Results The response rate was 58.3 %. The regulator was seen as being more responsible for quality of care than care providers. Patients were rated as having the least responsibility. Similar patterns were observed for the food service industry and the education sector. Complaints by patients’ associations were seen as an important source of information for quality regulation, while fewer respondents trusted information delivered by care providers. However, respondents supported the regulator’s imposition of lighter measures firstly. Conclusions There are discrepancies and similarities between public opinion and regulation policies. The discrepancies correspond to fundamental concepts; decentralisation of responsibilities is not what the public wants. There is little confidence in the regulator’s use of information obtained by care providers’ internal monitoring, while a larger role is seen for complaints of patient organisations. This discrepancy seems not to exist regarding the regulator’s approach of imposing measures. A gradual, and often soft approach, is favoured by the majority of the public in spite of the criticism that is voiced in the media regarding this approach. Our study contributes to the limited knowledge of public opinion on government regulation policies. This knowledge is needed in order to effectively assess different approaches to involve the public in regulation policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Bouwman
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Manja Bomhoff
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Paul Robben
- Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate, PO box 2680, 3500 GR, Utrecht, Netherlands. .,Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Roland Friele
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands. .,TRANZO (Scientific Centre for Care and Welfare), Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Coppen R, Groenewegen PP, Hazes JMWM, de Jong JD, Kievit J, de Neeling JNDN, Reijneveld SAM, Verheij RA, Vroom E. [Re-use of medical data for research. What do the Dutch think of the requirement for explicit consent?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2015; 160:A9868. [PMID: 27027208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE How do healthcare consumers perceive the use of medical data for scientific research, within the framework of protection of their personal data? DESIGN Survey among 731 members of the Healthcare Consumer Panel of the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL). METHOD A written and online questionnaire was used, consisting of general questions and 4 cases per respondent. The questions concerned the degree of trust respondents have in the use of previously registered data for different kinds of healthcare research, and their willingness to make data available under various conditions without being asked for explicit consent. RESULTS Respondents showed a high degree of trust in scientific researchers and physicians concerning the re-use of medical data for research. A majority agreed that it is not necessary to be explicitly asked for consent for this kind of research, providing they are informed: one-third found their autonomy in being able to decide to be more important than scientific progress; three-quarters found explicit permission unnecessary as long as the data is well-protected and only used for scientific research. CONCLUSION Data protection in research should be proportional to the risks of misuse and the benefits of the use of the data for research. A large majority of healthcare users trust the researchers, and the existing codes of conduct protect data sufficiently. Therefore, we see no need for stricter requirements for the use of health data, which would unnecessarily limit healthcare research. We do consider greater transparency about the research process to be necessary, in order to maintain a proper balance between personal-data protection and the need to emphasise the necessity for learning in the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Coppen
- NIVEL - Nederlands Instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg, Utrecht
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Dijk CE, Venema B, de Jong JD, de Bakker DH. Market competition and price of disease management programmes: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:510. [PMID: 25359224 PMCID: PMC4219132 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0510-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Managed competition was introduced into the health care system in several countries including the Netherlands, although effects of competition of both providers and health insurers on the price of health care are inconclusive. We investigated the association between competition of both providers (care groups) and health insurers and the price of disease management programmes (DMPs). Methods Data from 76 DMP contractual agreements for type II diabetes mellitus in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were used to analyse the association between market competition and the price of DMPs. Market competition was calculated per municipal health services region (GGD). Insurer market competition was measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), care group competition by the number of care groups and the care group market share of GPs. The effect of competition was cross-sectionally studied with linear regression analyses. Results Insurer market concentration (HHI) and care group market share were not associated with the price of DMPs. The number of care groups in a GGD region was associated with a lower price (−€4.68; 95% CI: −8.36 - -1.00). The mean difference in the price of DMPs between health insurers was €58. Conclusions The price of DMPs seems to be more dependent on the particular health insurer than on market conditions. For competition among health insurers and provider groups to develop, preconditions such as selective contracting and option for patient to change provider should be in place.
Collapse
|
34
|
Victoor A, Hansen J, van den Akker-van Marle ME, van den Berg B, van den Hout WB, de Jong JD. Choosing your health insurance package: a method for measuring the public's preferences for changes in the national health insurance plan. Health Policy 2014; 117:257-65. [PMID: 24875333 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Revised: 04/14/2014] [Accepted: 04/26/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
With rising healthcare expenditure and limited budgets available, countries are having to make choices about the content of health insurance plans. The views of the general population can help determine such priorities. In this article, we investigate whether preferences of the general population regarding the content of health insurance plans could be measured with the help of a stated preference method: the Basket Method (BM). In this method, people use an online tool to include or exclude healthcare interventions from their hypothetical insurance package; this then affects their monthly premium. The study was conducted in the Netherlands. In total, 1007 members of two panels managed by the NIVEL filled out an online questionnaire that included the BM. The suitability of the BM was tested with the help of five criteria, e.g. the BM's ability to distinguish between healthcare interventions. Our results suggest that the BM is suitable for measuring preferences of the general population regarding the content of the health insurance plan, as it performs well on most criteria. Policy makers can use these preferences when deciding the content of the health insurance plan. Its contents will then be more aligned to the population's needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aafke Victoor
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Johan Hansen
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | | | - Bernard van den Berg
- University of York, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Department of Medical Decision Making, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Dijk CE, Korevaar JC, Koopmans B, de Jong JD, de Bakker DH. The primary-secondary care interface: does provision of more services in primary care reduce referrals to medical specialists? Health Policy 2014; 118:48-55. [PMID: 24816225 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2013] [Revised: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Great variation in referral rates between primary care physicians has been the main reason to influence physician's referral behaviour, by for example, stimulating extra services. This study investigated the extent to which the number of therapeutic and diagnostic services performed by primary care physicians influenced referrals. Data was derived from electronic medical records of 70 general practices for the period 2006 until 2010. For the total patient population (N=651,089 patient years) and specific patients groups for whom specific services were performed mostly (28 groups; 10 services), logistic multilevel regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between the number of services performed in a practice and referrals to medical specialists. The total number of services performed in a practice was not associated with the referral rate (OR: 1.00). Only for two specific services was a significant association found: a lower referral rate for minor surgery for patient with sebaceous cysts (OR: 0.98) and a higher rate for Doppler diagnostic tests for patients with other peripheral arterial diseases (OR: 1.04). As the number of services in general practice was rarely associated with referrals, other measures might be more effective in changing referral behaviour. Another explanation for our results could be that certain preconditions have not been met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christel E van Dijk
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Joke C Korevaar
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Berber Koopmans
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Dinny H de Bakker
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Tilburg University, Scientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (TRANZO), 90153, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bes RE, Wendel S, Curfs EC, Groenewegen PP, de Jong JD. Acceptance of selective contracting: the role of trust in the health insurer. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:375. [PMID: 24083663 PMCID: PMC3850712 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In a demand oriented health care system based on managed competition, health insurers have incentives to become prudent buyers of care on behalf of their enrolees. They are allowed to selectively contract care providers. This is supposed to stimulate competition between care providers and both increase the quality of care and contain costs in the health care system. However, health insurers are reluctant to implement selective contracting; they believe their enrolees will not accept this. One reason, insurers believe, is that enrolees do not trust their health insurer. However, this has never been studied. This paper aims to study the role played by enrolees’ trust in the health insurer on their acceptance of selective contracting. Methods An online survey was conducted among 4,422 people insured through a large Dutch health insurance company. Trust in the health insurer, trust in the purchasing strategy of the health insurer and acceptance of selective contracting were measured using multiple item scales. A regression model was constructed to analyse the results. Results Trust in the health insurer turned out to be an important prerequisite for the acceptance of selective contracting among their enrolees. The association of trust in the purchasing strategy of the health insurer with acceptance of selective contracting is stronger for older people than younger people. Furthermore, it was found that men and healthier people accepted selective contracting by their health insurer more readily. This was also true for younger people with a low level of trust in their health insurer. Conclusion This study provides insight into factors that influence people’s acceptance of selective contracting by their health insurer. This may help health insurers to implement selective contracting in a way their enrolees will accept and, thus, help systems of managed competition to develop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy E Bes
- NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Otterstraat 118 - 124, 3513, CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Bodegom-Vos L, de Jong JD, Spreeuwenberg P, Curfs EC, Groenewegen PP. Are patients' preferences for shifting services from medical specialists to general practitioners related to the type of medical intervention? Qual Prim Care 2013; 21:81-95. [PMID: 23735689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve the feasibility of shifting medical specialist to general practitioner (GP) services in patient-centred health care systems, it is important to know how this substitution is valued by patients. However, insight into patients' preferences is lacking. AIM This study aims to fill this gap by assessing whether patients' preferences for substitution are related to the type of medical intervention. METHODS Questionnaires were sent to 1000 members of the Dutch Insurants Panel (potential patients). Panel members were asked about their preferences for and use of medical specialist and GP services regarding 11 medical interventions. Six hundred and ninety-four members (69%) responded. We used multilevel multinomial regression to analyse the data. RESULTS Preferences were significantly related to medical intervention type. GP services were preferred for follow-up treatments (e.g. removing stitches) and non-complex invasive treatments (e.g. removal of lumps), and medical specialist services were preferred for complex invasive treatments (e.g. injection therapy for varicose veins), non-invasive treatments (e.g. start of insulin therapy) and diagnostic examinations (e.g. abdominal ultrasound). Age, effort required to visit a GP, perceived health status and previous treatment experiences also influenced preferences but did not confound the effects of medical intervention type. CONCLUSION This study provides strong indications that patients' preferences for substitution are influenced by the type of medical intervention. Therefore it seems important that health policy makers, purchasers and practitioners take the preferences of (potential) patients into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht and Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Damman OC, Bloemendal E, Wendel S, de Jong JD, Rademakers J. Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12:101. [PMID: 22958295 PMCID: PMC3483238 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Accepted: 08/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Consumers are increasingly exposed to comparative healthcare information (information about the quality of different healthcare providers). Partly because of its complexity, the use of this information has been limited. The objective of this study was to examine how the amount of presented information influences the comprehension and use of comparative healthcare information when important consumer characteristics and skills are taken into account. Methods In this randomized controlled experiment, comparative information on total hip or knee surgery was used as a test case. An online survey was distributed among 800 members of the NIVEL Insurants Panel and 76 hip- or knee surgery patients. Participants were assigned to one of four subgroups, who were shown 3, 7, 11 or 15 quality aspects of three hospitals. We conducted Kruskall-Wallis tests, Chi-square tests and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses to examine relationships between the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills (literacy, numeracy, active choice behaviour) on one hand, and outcome measures related to effectively using information (comprehension, perceived usefulness of information, hospital choice, ease of making a choice) on the other hand. Results 414 people (47%) participated. Regression analysis showed that the amount of information slightly influenced the comprehension and the perceived usefulness of comparative healthcare information. It did not affect consumers’ hospital choice and ease of making this choice. Consumer characteristics (especially age) and skills (especially literacy) were the most important factors affecting the comprehension of information and the ease of making a hospital choice. For the perceived usefulness of comparative information, active choice behaviour was the most influencing factor. Conclusion The effects of the amount of information were not unambiguous. It remains unclear what the ideal amount of quality information to be presented would be. Reducing the amount of information will probably not automatically result in more effective use of comparative healthcare information by consumers. More important, consumer characteristics and skills appeared to be more influential factors contributing to information comprehension and use. Consequently, we would suggest that more emphasis on improving consumers’ skills is needed to enhance the use of comparative healthcare information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolien C Zwijnenberg
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, Utrecht 3500 BN, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study trends and variation in adherence to the main national formulary for the 20 most prevalent health problems in Dutch general practice over a 5-year period (2003-07). METHODS Routine electronic medical records from a pool of 115 representative general practices were linked to the main national formulary. Analyses included over 2 million prescriptions for 246 391 patients. The outcome variable was whether or not the prescribed medication was congruent with recommendations in the national formulary. Trends and variation were analysed using three-level multilevel logistic regression analyses (general practice, patient, and prescription). RESULTS The percentage of formulary adherent prescriptions for the 20 most prevalent health problems was 73-76% between 2003 and 2007. The percentage varied considerably between guidelines. Lowest adherence rates were found for acute bronchitis and acute upper respiratory infection. Interpractice variation was constant over time. CONCLUSIONS General practice information networks are useful for monitoring general patterns of formulary on a year-to-year basis. Formulary adherence is stable over time but varies across diagnoses, patients and general practices. In the past decade, efforts have been made to increase the level of formulary adherent prescribing. These general efforts managed to stabilize (variation in) adherence in a field where many other initiatives (e.g. by pharmaceutical companies) are undertaken to influence prescribing behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wendel S, de Jong JD, Curfs EC. Consumer evaluation of complaint handling in the Dutch health insurance market. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:310. [PMID: 22085762 PMCID: PMC3250957 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Accepted: 11/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background How companies deal with complaints is a particularly challenging aspect in managing the quality of their service. In this study we test the direct and relative effects of service quality dimensions on consumer complaint satisfaction evaluations and trust in a company in the Dutch health insurance market. Methods A cross-sectional survey design was used. Survey data of 150 members of a Dutch insurance panel who lodged a complaint at their healthcare insurer within the past 12 months were surveyed. The data were collected using a questionnaire containing validated multi-item measures. These measures assess the service quality dimensions consisting of functional quality and technical quality and consumer complaint satisfaction evaluations consisting of complaint satisfaction and overall satisfaction with the company after complaint handling. Respondents' trust in a company after complaint handling was also measured. Using factor analysis, reliability and validity of the measures were assessed. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between these variables. Results Overall, results confirm the hypothesized direct and relative effects between the service quality dimensions and consumer complaint satisfaction evaluations and trust in the company. No support was found for the effect of technical quality on overall satisfaction with the company. This outcome might be driven by the context of our study; namely, consumers get in touch with a company to resolve a specific problem and therefore might focus more on complaint satisfaction and less on overall satisfaction with the company. Conclusions Overall, the model we present is valid in the context of the Dutch health insurance market. Management is able to increase consumers' complaint satisfaction, overall satisfaction with the company, and trust in the company by improving elements of functional and technical quality. Furthermore, we show that functional and technical quality do not influence consumer satisfaction evaluations and trust in the company to the same extent. Therefore, it is important for managers to be aware of the type of consumer satisfaction they are measuring when evaluating the handling of complaints within their company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wendel
- NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P,O, Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Reitsma-van Rooijen M, de Jong JD, Rijken M. Regulated competition in health care: switching and barriers to switching in the Dutch health insurance system. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11:95. [PMID: 21569225 PMCID: PMC3112070 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2010] [Accepted: 05/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2006, a number of changes in the Dutch health insurance system came into effect. In this new system mobility of insured is important. The idea is that insured switch insurers because they are not satisfied with quality of care and the premium of their insurance. As a result, insurers will in theory strive for a better balance between price and quality. The Dutch changes have caught the attention, internationally, of both policy makers and researchers. In our study we examined switching behaviour over three years (2007-2009). We tested if there are differences in the numbers of switchers between groups defined by socio-demographic and health characteristics and between the general population and people with chronic illness or disability. We also looked at reasons for (not-)switching and at perceived barriers to switching. METHODS Switching behaviour and reasons for (not-)switching were measured over three years (2007-2009) by sending postal questionnaires to members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel and of the National Panel of people with Chronic illness or Disability. Data were available for each year and for each panel for at least 1896 respondents - a response of between 71% and 88%. RESULTS The percentages of switchers are low; 6% in 2007, 4% in 2008 and 3% in 2009. Younger and higher educated people switch more often than older and lower educated people and women switch more often than men. There is no difference in the percentage of switchers between the general population and people with chronic illness or disability. People with a bad self-perceived health, and chronically ill and disabled, perceive more barriers to switching than others. CONCLUSION The percentages of switchers are comparable to the old system. Switching is not based on quality of care and thus it can be questioned whether it will lead to a better balance between price and quality. Although there is no difference in the frequency of switching among the chronically ill and disabled and people with a bad self-perceived health compared to others, they do perceive more barriers to switching. This suggests there are inequalities in the new system.
Collapse
|
42
|
Wendel S, Bes RE, de Jong JD, Schellevis FG, Friele RD. [The fat doctor and the fat patient--can a doctor also be allowed to transgress?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154:A2897. [PMID: 21211080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of opinions of patients with regard to an unhealthy lifestyle of the doctor and assessment as to whether or not this is dependent on the patient's own lifestyle (healthy or unhealthy). DESIGN Descriptive questionnaire study. METHOD An online questionnaire was sent to 1000 members of a panel. They were asked to score a set of statements about their trust in a doctor who smokes, drinks or is overweight and the willingness to follow the advice of such a doctor. The items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). RESULTS The respondents found it very important that doctors should serve as a role model. A striking finding was that two-thirds would follow the advice of a doctor who does not serve as a role model. Furthermore, smoking, drinking and overweight respondents were shown to have more trust in a smoking, drinking or overweight doctor than non-smokers, non-drinkers or respondents who are not overweight. Regarding the willingness to follow a doctor's advice, we found that drinking and overweight respondents were more likely to follow the advice of a drinking or overweight doctor than non-drinkers or respondents who are not overweight. We did not find a significant difference between smokers and non-smokers and their willingness to follow the advice from a smoking doctor. CONCLUSION Respondents found it important that doctors serve as a role model. Yet, a majority of the respondents would follow the advice of a doctor who does not serve as a role model. Respondents who struggle with the same unhealthy lifestyle habits as their doctor reported that they are more likely to follow his or her advice than respondents who do not have these unhealthy lifestyle habits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Wendel
- Nederlands instituut voor onderzoek van de gezondheidszorg (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hendriks M, de Jong JD, van den Brink-Muinen A, Groenewegen PP. The intention to switch health insurer and actual switching behaviour: are there differences between groups of people? Health Expect 2009; 13:195-207. [PMID: 19906212 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00583.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several western countries have introduced managed competition in their health care system. In the Netherlands, a new health insurance law was introduced in January 2006 making it easier to switch health insurer each year. OBJECTIVE The objective was to measure people's intention to switch health insurer and actual switching behaviour. We also examined whether some groups were less inclined to switch health insurer and/or had more difficulty to exert their intention to switch. DESIGN In October 2006, members of three Dutch panels indicated whether they intended to switch health insurer during that year's open enrollment period. In the beginning of 2007, the same people were asked whether they indeed switched health insurer. RESULTS Only 1% intended to switch health insurer. Women, older people, lower educated people, people who were insured for a longer period and people who reported a bad or moderate health were less inclined to switch health insurer. The amount of switching was higher among individuals who intended to switch (31%) than among individuals who did not know whether they would switch (7%) and individuals with no intention to switch (2%). Among those who intended to switch health insurer, women and people who reported a good health switched health insurer more often. The years of enrollment were also associated with actual switching behaviour. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We might have to temper the optimistic expectations on enhanced choice. Future research should determine why people do not switch health insurer when they intend to and which barriers they experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Hendriks
- NIVEL-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P, Schellevis F, Westert GP. Do guidelines create uniformity in medical practice? Soc Sci Med 2009; 70:209-16. [PMID: 19879028 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2008] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This article aimed to test the general hypothesis that guidelines create uniformity, or reduce variation, in medical practice. Medical practice variation has policy interest and is one of the reasons for developing guidelines. The development and implementation of guidelines was considered in the broader context of processes of rationalization. We focused on the influence of voluntary guidelines developed by the professional organization for family physicians in the Netherlands on variation in drug prescription. Data were used from the First and Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP1 and DNSGP2), collected in 1987 and 2001 respectively. DNSGP1 consisted of 103 practices and 161 GPs serving 335.000 patients. DNSGP2 consisted of 104 practices and 195 GPs serving 390.000 patients. Two groups of diagnoses were created, one containing all diagnoses for which guidelines were introduced and one containing all other diagnoses. For both groups a measure of concentration, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), was used to represent variation. This measure of concentration was compared between both groups using multilevel analysis. Results showed that although there was an overall increase in variation (a significantly lower HHI) in prescription, the increase was less in the cases of diagnoses for which guidelines were introduced. Guidelines, primarily, had an effect on variations in single-handed practices. The overall conclusion is that the introduction of guidelines, although it probably tempered the increase in variation, did not reduce variation.
Collapse
|
45
|
de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P, Westert GP, de Bakker DH. Do decision support systems influence variation in prescription? BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:20. [PMID: 19183464 PMCID: PMC2662826 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2008] [Accepted: 01/30/2009] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Translating scientific evidence into daily practice is problematic. All kinds of intervention strategies, using educational and/or directive strategies, aimed at modifying behavior, have evolved, but have been found only partially successful. In this article the focus is on (computerized) decision support systems (DSSs). DSSs intervene in physicians' daily routine, as opposed to interventions that aim at influencing knowledge in order to change behavior. We examined whether general practitioners (GPs) are prescribing in accordance with the advice given by the DSS and whether there is less variation in prescription when the DSS is used. Methods Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP2), collected in 2001. A total of 82 diagnoses, 749811 contacts, 133 physicians, and 85 practices was included in the analyses. GPs using the DSS daily were compared to GPs who do not use the DSS. Multilevel analyses were used to analyse the data. Two outcome measures were chosen: whether prescription was in accordance with the advice of the DSS or not, and a measure of concentration, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Results GPs who use the DSS daily prescribe more according to the advice given in the DSS than GPs who do not use the DSS. Contradictory to our expectation there was no significant difference between the HHIs for both groups: variation in prescription was comparable. Conclusion We studied the use of a DSS for drug prescribing in general practice in the Netherlands. The DSS is based on guidelines developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners and implemented in the Electronic Medical Systems of the GPs. GPs using the DSS more often prescribe in accordance with the advice given in the DSS compared to GPs not using the DSS. This finding, however, did not mean that variation is lower; variation is the same for GPs using and for GPs not using a DSS. Implications of the study are that DSSs can be used to implement guidelines, but that it should not be expected that variation is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Heiligers PJM, de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Hingstman L, Völker B, Spreeuwenberg P. Is networking different with doctors working part-time? Differences in social networks of part-time and full-time doctors. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8:204. [PMID: 18834545 PMCID: PMC2583974 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2008] [Accepted: 10/04/2008] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Part-time working is a growing phenomenon in medicine, which is expected to influence informal networks at work differently compared to full-time working. The opportunity to meet and build up social capital at work has offered a basis for theoretical arguments. Methods Twenty-eight teams of medical specialists in the Netherlands, including 226 individuals participated in this study. Interviews with team representatives and individual questionnaires were used. Data were gathered on three types of networks: relationships of consulting, communication and trust. For analyses, network and multilevel applications were used. Differences between individual doctors and between teams were both analysed, taking the dependency structure of the data into account, because networks of individual doctors are not independent. Teams were divided into teams with and without doctors working part-time. Results and Discussion Contrary to expectations we found no impact of part-time working on the size of personal networks, neither at the individual nor at the team level. The same was found regarding efficient reachability. Whereas we expected part-time doctors to choose their relations as efficiently as possible, we even found the opposite in intended relationships of trust, implying that efficiency in reaching each other was higher for full-time doctors. But we found as expected that in mixed teams with part-time doctors the frequency of regular communication was less compared to full-time teams. Furthermore, as expected the strength of the intended relationships of trust of part-time and full-time doctors was equally high. Conclusion From these findings we can conclude that part-time doctors are not aiming at efficiency by limiting the size of networks or by efficient reachability, because they want to contact their colleagues directly in order to prevent from communication errors. On the other hand, together with the growth of teams, we found this strategy, focussed on reaching all colleagues, was diminishing. And our data confirmed that formalisation was increasing together with the growth of teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phil J M Heiligers
- NIVEL - Netherlands institute for health services research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
de Jong JD, van den Brink-Muinen A, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8:58. [PMID: 18366678 PMCID: PMC2287167 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2007] [Accepted: 03/19/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND On 1 January 2006 a number of far-reaching changes in the Dutch health insurance system came into effect. In the new system of managed competition consumer mobility plays an important role. Consumers are free to change their insurer and insurance plan every year. The idea is that consumers who are not satisfied with the premium or quality of care provided will opt for a different insurer. This would force insurers to strive for good prices and quality of care. Internationally, the Dutch changes are under the attention of both policy makers and researchers. Questions answered in this article relate to switching behaviour, reasons for switching, and differences between population categories. METHODS Postal questionnaires were sent to 1516 members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel and to 3757 members of the National Panel of the Chronically ill and Disabled (NPCD) in April 2006. The questionnaire was returned by 1198 members of the Consumer Panel (response 79%) and by 3211 members of the NPCD (response 86%). Among other things, questions were asked about choices for a health insurer and insurance plan and the reasons for this choice. RESULTS Young and healthy people switch insurer more often than elderly or people in bad health. The chronically ill and disabled do not switch less often than the general population when both populations are comparable on age, sex and education. For the general population, premium is more important than content, while the chronically ill and disabled value content of the insurance package as well. However, quality of care is not important for either group as a reason for switching. CONCLUSION There is increased mobility in the new system for both the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. This however is not based on quality of care. If reasons for switching are unrelated to the quality of care, it is hard to believe that switching influences the quality of care. As yet there are no signs of barriers to switch insurer for the chronically ill and disabled. This however could change in the future and it is therefore important to monitor changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lugtenberg M, Heiligers PJM, de Jong JD, Hingstman L. Internal medicine specialists' attitudes towards working part-time: a comparison between 1996 and 2004. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6:126. [PMID: 17026741 PMCID: PMC1617100 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2006] [Accepted: 10/06/2006] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although medical specialists traditionally hold negative views towards working part-time, the practice of medicine has evolved. Given the trend towards more part-time work and that there is no evidence that it compromises the quality of care, attitudes towards part-time work may have changed as well in recent years. The aim of this paper was to examine the possible changes in attitudes towards part-time work among specialists in internal medicine between 1996 and 2004. Moreover, we wanted to determine whether these attitudes were associated with individual characteristics (age, gender, investments in work) and whether attitudes of specialists within a partnership showed more resemblance than specialists' attitudes from different partnerships. Methods Two samples were used in this study: data of a survey conducted in 1996 and in 2004. After selecting internal medicine specialists working in general hospitals in The Netherlands, the sample consisted of 219 specialists in 1996 and 363 specialists in 2004. They were sent a questionnaire, including topics on the attitudes towards part-time work. Results Internal medicine specialists' attitudes towards working part-time became slightly more positive between 1996 and 2004. Full-time working specialists in 2004 still expressed concerns regarding the investments of part-timers in overhead tasks, the flexibility of task division, efficiency, communication and continuity of care. In 1996 gender was the only predictor of the attitude, in 2004 being a full- or a part-timer, age and the time invested in work were associated with this attitude. Furthermore, specialists' attitudes were not found to cluster much within partnerships. Conclusion In spite of the increasing number of specialists working or preferring to work part-time, part-time practice among internal medicine specialists seems not to be fully accepted. The results indicate that the attitudes are no longer gender based, but are associated with age and work aspects such as the number of hours worked. Though there is little evidence to support them, negative ideas about the consequences of part-time work for the quality of care still exist. Policy should be aimed at removing the organisational difficulties related to part-time work and create a system in which part-time practice is fully integrated and accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Lugtenberg
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Phil JM Heiligers
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Department of Social Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lammert Hingstman
- NIVEL – Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
de Jong JD, Westert GP, Lagoe R, Groenewegen PP. Variation in hospital length of stay: do physicians adapt their length of stay decisions to what is usual in the hospital where they work? Health Serv Res 2006; 41:374-94. [PMID: 16584454 PMCID: PMC1702523 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00486.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that physicians who work in different hospitals adapt their length of stay decisions to what is usual in the hospital under consideration. DATA SOURCES Secondary data were used, originating from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). SPARCS is a major management tool for assisting hospitals, agencies, and health care organizations with decision making in relation to financial planning and monitoring of inpatient and ambulatory surgery services and costs in New York state. STUDY DESIGN Data on length of stay for surgical interventions and medical conditions (a total of seven diagnosis-related groups [DRGs]) were studied, to find out whether there is more variation between than within hospitals. Data (1999, 2000, and 2001) from all hospitals in New York state were used. The study examined physicians practicing in one hospital and physicians practicing in more than one hospital, to determine whether average length of stay differs according to the hospital of practice. Multilevel models were used to determine variation between and within hospitals. A t-test was used to test whether length of stay for patients of each multihospital physician differed from the average length of stay in each of the two hospitals. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS There is significantly (p<.05) more variation between than within hospitals in most of the study populations. Physicians working in two hospitals had patient lengths of stay comparable with the usual practice in the hospital where the procedure was performed. The proportion of physicians working in one hospital did not have a consistent effect for all DRGs on the variation within hospitals. CONCLUSION Physicians adapt to their colleagues or to the managerial demands of the particular hospital in which they work. The hospital and broader work environment should be taken into account when developing effective interventions to reduce variation in medical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Jong JD, Heiligers P, Groenewegen PP, Hingstman L. Part-time and full-time medical specialists, are there differences in allocation of time? BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6:26. [PMID: 16515698 PMCID: PMC1409779 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2005] [Accepted: 03/03/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An increasing number of medical specialists prefer to work part-time. This development can be found worldwide. Problems to be faced in the realization of part-time work in medicine include the division of night and weekend shifts, as well as communication between physicians and continuity of care. People tend to think that physicians working part-time are less devoted to their work, implying that full-time physicians complete a greater number of tasks. The central question in this article is whether part-time medical specialists allocate their time differently to their tasks than full-time medical specialists. Methods A questionnaire was sent by mail to all internists (N = 817), surgeons (N = 693) and radiologists (N = 621) working in general hospitals in the Netherlands. Questions were asked about the actual situation, such as hours worked and night and weekend shifts. The response was 53% (n = 411) for internists, 52% (n = 359) for surgeons, and 36% (n = 213) for radiologists. Due to non-response on specific questions there were 367 internists, 316 surgeons, and 71 radiologists included in the analyses. Multilevel analyses were used to analyze the data. Results Part-time medical specialists do not spend proportionally more time on direct patient care. With respect to night and weekend shifts, part-time medical specialists account for proportionally more or an equal share of these shifts. The number of hours worked per FTE is higher for part-time than for full-time medical specialists, although this difference is only significant for surgeons. Conclusion In general, part-time medical specialists do their share of the job. However, we focussed on input only. Besides input, output like the numbers of services provided deserves attention as well. The trend in medicine towards more part-time work has an important consequence: more medical specialists are needed to get the work done. Therefore, a greater number of medical specialists have to be trained. Part-time work is not only a female concern; there are also (international) trends for male medical specialists that show a decline in the number of hours worked. This indicates an overall change in attitudes towards the number of hours medical specialists should work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL - Netherlands institute for health services research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Phil Heiligers
- NIVEL - Netherlands institute for health services research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Department of Social Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL - Netherlands institute for health services research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Department of Social Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lammert Hingstman
- NIVEL - Netherlands institute for health services research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|