Follow the money--the politics of embryonic stem cell research

Hopes and fears for professional movement in the stem cell community

We examine here how the issue of professional migration in stem cell research has been explored in news media, government documents, and the peer-reviewed literature. The results shed light on how patterns of and forces that motivate these movements are depicted and highlight issues of significance to the stem cell community.

Power-laws and the use of pluripotent stem cell lines

It is widely accepted that the (now reversed) Bush administration's decision to restrict federal funding for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research to a few "eligible" hESC lines is responsible for the sustained preferential use of a small subset of hESC lines (principally the H1 and H9 lines) in basic and preclinical research. Yet, international hESC usage patterns, in both permissive and restrictive political environments, do not correlate with a specific type of stem cell policy. Here we conducted a descriptive analysis of hESC line usage and compared the ability of policy-driven processes and collaborative processes inherent to biomedical research to recapitulate global hESC usage patterns. We find that current global hESC usage can be modelled as a cumulative advantage process, independent of restrictive or permissive policy influence, suggesting a primarily innovation-driven (rather than policy-driven) mechanism underlying human pluripotent stem cell usage in preclinical research.

The tumorigenicity of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells

The unique abilities of human pluripotent stem cells to self-renew and to differentiate into cells of the three germ layers make them an invaluable tool for the future of regenerative medicine. However, the same properties also make them tumorigenic, and therefore hinder their clinical application. Hence, the tumorigenicity of human embryonic stem cells (HESCs) has been extensively studied. Until recently, it was assumed that human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) would behave like their embryonic counterparts in respect to their tumorigenicity. However, a rapidly accumulating body of evidence suggests that there are important genetic and epigenetic differences between these two cell types, which seem to influence their tumorigenicity.

International stem cell collaboration: how disparate policies between the United States and the United Kingdom impact research

As the scientific community globalizes, it is increasingly important to understand the effects of international collaboration on the quality and quantity of research produced. While it is generally assumed that international collaboration enhances the quality of research, this phenomenon is not well examined. Stem cell research is unique in that it is both politically charged and a research area that often generates international collaborations, making it an ideal case through which to examine international collaborations. Furthermore, with promising medical applications, the research area is dynamic and responsive to a globalizing science environment. Thus, studying international collaborations in stem cell research elucidates the role of existing international networks in promoting quality research, as well as the effects that disparate national policies might have on research. This study examined the impact of collaboration on publication significance in the United States and the United Kingdom, world leaders in stem cell research with disparate policies. We reviewed publications by US and UK authors from 2008, along with their citation rates and the political factors that may have contributed to the number of international collaborations. The data demonstrated that international collaborations significantly increased an article's impact for UK and US investigators. While this applied to UK authors whether they were corresponding or secondary, this effect was most significant for US authors who were corresponding authors. While the UK exhibited a higher proportion of international publications than the US, this difference was consistent with overall trends in international scientific collaboration. The findings suggested that national stem cell policy differences and regulatory mechanisms driving international stem cell research in the US and UK did not affect the frequency of international collaborations, or even the countries with which the US and UK most often collaborated. Geographical and traditional collaborative relationships were the predominate considerations in establishing international collaborations.

Worldwide Survey of Published Procedures to Culture Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Since their derivation 11 years ago, human embryonic stem (hES) cells have become a powerful tool in both basic biomedical research and developmental biology. Their capacity for self-renewal and differentiation into any tissue type has also brought interest from fields such as cell therapy and drug screening. We conducted an extensive analysis of 750 papers (51% of the total published about hES cells between 1998 and 2008) to present a spectrum of hES cell research including culture protocols developed worldwide. This review may stimulate discussions about the importance of having unvarying methods to culture hES cells, in order to facilitate comparisons among data obtained by research groups elsewhere, especially concerning preclinical studies. Moreover, the description of the most widely used cell lines, reagents, and procedures adopted internationally will help newcomers on deciding the best strategies for starting their own studies. Finally, the results will contribute with the efforts of stem cell researchers on comparing the performance of different aspects related to hES cell culture methods.

The global research neglect of unassisted smoking cessation: causes and consequences

Simon Chapman and Ross MacKenzie review the evidence and argue that health promotion messages should emphasize that the most successful method used by most ex-smokers is unassisted cessation.

Scientific illiteracy and the partisan takeover of biology

Americans have long worried about conflicts between scientific and religious beliefs. For the most part, this ambivalence has not threatened the practice and teaching of biology--until recently.

Moving human embryonic stem cells from legislature to lab: remaining legal and ethical questions

Greely discusses unanswered ethical and legal issues, such as those surrounding the creation of embryos, derivation of cell lines, uses of cell lines, and questions of intellectual property.

Navigating the quagmire: the regulation of human embryonic stem cell research

Embryonic stem (ES) cell research has garnered almost unprecedented attention. Debate over the boundaries of such research is ongoing, and the regulation of the field varies widely between countries. This article identifies and evaluates the four major positions that emanate from current international regulations. ES cell policies may ultimately impact on public health, and hence they must be both rigorous and transparent. We contend that these goals will only be achieved if policy is both ethically consistent and clinically realistic with regard to the ability to achieve therapeutic goals. We conclude that policies allowing the ongoing extraction of stem cells from spare in vitro fertilization embryos and the creation of embryos for research (within set limitations) cope most adequately with the tension between varying views on the moral status of the human embryo and the therapeutic potential inherent within ES cell research.