A Dual Model for Prioritizing Cancer Mutations in the Non-coding Genome Based on Germline and Somatic Events

In silico Design for Systems-Based Metabolic Engineering for the Bioconversion of Valuable Compounds From Industrial By-Products

Selecting appropriate metabolic engineering targets to build efficient cell factories maximizing the bioconversion of industrial by-products to valuable compounds taking into account time restrictions is a significant challenge in industrial biotechnology. Microbial metabolism engineering following a rational design has been widely studied. However, it is a cost-, time-, and laborious-intensive process because of the cell network complexity; thus, it is important to use tools that allow predicting gene deletions. An in silico experiment was performed to model and understand the metabolic engineering effects on the cell factory considering a second complexity level by transcriptomics data integration. In this study, a systems-based metabolic engineering target prediction was used to increase glycerol bioconversion to succinic acid based on Escherichia coli. Transcriptomics analysis suggests insights on how to increase cell glycerol utilization to further design efficient cell factories. Three E. coli models were used: a core model, a second model based on the integration of transcriptomics data obtained from growth in an optimized culture media, and a third one obtained after integration of transcriptomics data from adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) experiments. A total of 2,402 strains were obtained with fumarase and pyruvate dehydrogenase being frequently predicted for all the models, suggesting these reactions as essential to increase succinic acid production. Finally, based on using flux balance analysis (FBA) results for all the mutants predicted, a machine learning method was developed to predict new mutants as well as to propose optimal metabolic engineering targets and mutants based on the measurement of the importance of each knockout's (feature's) contribution. Glycerol has become an interesting carbon source for industrial processes due to biodiesel business growth since it has shown promising results in terms of biomass/substrate yields. The combination of transcriptome, systems metabolic modeling, and machine learning analyses revealed the versatility of computational models to predict key metabolic engineering targets in a less cost-, time-, and laborious-intensive process. These data provide a platform to improve the prediction of metabolic engineering targets to design efficient cell factories. Our results may also work as a guide and platform for the selection/engineering of microorganisms for the production of interesting chemical compounds.

NIMBus: a negative binomial regression based Integrative Method for mutation Burden Analysis

Background

Identifying frequently mutated regions is a key approach to discover DNA elements influencing cancer progression. However, it is challenging to identify these burdened regions due to mutation rate heterogeneity across the genome and across different individuals. Moreover, it is known that this heterogeneity partially stems from genomic confounding factors, such as replication timing and chromatin organization. The increasing availability of cancer whole genome sequences and functional genomics data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) may help address these issues.

Results

We developed a negative binomial regression-based Integrative Method for mutation Burden analysiS (NIMBus). Our approach addresses the over-dispersion of mutation count statistics by (1) using a Gamma–Poisson mixture model to capture the mutation-rate heterogeneity across different individuals and (2) estimating regional background mutation rates by regressing the varying local mutation counts against genomic features extracted from ENCODE. We applied NIMBus to whole-genome cancer sequences from the PanCancer Analysis of Whole Genomes project (PCAWG) and other cohorts. It successfully identified well-known coding and noncoding drivers, such as TP53 and the TERT promoter. To further characterize the burdening of non-coding regions, we used NIMBus to screen transcription factor binding sites in promoter regions that intersect DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs). This analysis identified mutational hotspots that potentially disrupt gene regulatory networks in cancer. We also compare this method to other mutation burden analysis methods.

Conclusion

NIMBus is a powerful tool to identify mutational hotspots. The NIMBus software and results are available as an online resource at github.gersteinlab.org/nimbus.

LncRNAs as Chromatin Regulators in Cancer: From Molecular Function to Clinical Potential

During the last decade, high-throughput sequencing efforts in the fields of transcriptomics and epigenomics have shed light on the noncoding part of the transcriptome and its potential role in human disease. Regulatory noncoding RNAs are broadly divided into short and long noncoding transcripts. The latter, also known as lncRNAs, are defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides with low or no protein-coding potential. LncRNAs form a diverse group of transcripts that regulate vital cellular functions through interactions with proteins, chromatin, and even RNA itself. Notably, an important regulatory aspect of these RNA species is their association with the epigenetic machinery and the recruitment of its regulatory apparatus to specific loci, resulting in DNA methylation and/or post-translational modifications of histones. Such epigenetic modifications play a pivotal role in maintaining the active or inactive transcriptional state of chromatin and are crucial regulators of normal cellular development and tissue-specific gene expression. Evidently, aberrant expression of lncRNAs that interact with epigenetic modifiers can cause severe epigenetic disruption and is thus is closely associated with altered gene function, cellular dysregulation, and malignant transformation. Here, we survey the latest breakthroughs concerning the role of lncRNAs interacting with the epigenetic machinery in various forms of cancer.

Regulatory variants: from detection to predicting impact

Variants within non-coding genomic regions can greatly affect disease. In recent years, increasing focus has been given to these variants, and how they can alter regulatory elements, such as enhancers, transcription factor binding sites and DNA methylation regions. Such variants can be considered regulatory variants. Concurrently, much effort has been put into establishing international consortia to undertake large projects aimed at discovering regulatory elements in different tissues, cell lines and organisms, and probing the effects of genetic variants on regulation by measuring gene expression. Here, we describe methods and techniques for discovering disease-associated non-coding variants using sequencing technologies. We then explain the computational procedures that can be used for annotating these variants using the information from the aforementioned projects, and prediction of their putative effects, including potential pathogenicity, based on rule-based and machine learning approaches. We provide the details of techniques to validate these predictions, by mapping chromatin-chromatin and chromatin-protein interactions, and introduce Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Associated Protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) technology, which has already been used in this field and is likely to have a big impact on its future evolution. We also give examples of regulatory variants associated with multiple complex diseases. This review is aimed at bioinformaticians interested in the characterization of regulatory variants, molecular biologists and geneticists interested in understanding more about the nature and potential role of such variants from a functional point of views, and clinicians who may wish to learn about variants in non-coding genomic regions associated with a given disease and find out what to do next to uncover how they impact on the underlying mechanisms.

A benchmark study of scoring methods for non-coding mutations

Motivation

Detailed knowledge of coding sequences has led to different candidate models for pathogenic variant prioritization. Several deleteriousness scores have been proposed for the non-coding part of the genome, but no large-scale comparison has been realized to date to assess their performance.

Results

We compared the leading scoring tools (CADD, FATHMM-MKL, Funseq2 and GWAVA) and some recent competitors (DANN, SNP and SOM scores) for their ability to discriminate assumed pathogenic variants from assumed benign variants (using the ClinVar, COSMIC and 1000 genomes project databases). Using the ClinVar benchmark, CADD was the best tool for detecting the pathogenic variants that are mainly located in protein coding gene regions. Using the COSMIC benchmark, FATHMM-MKL, GWAVA and SOMliver outperformed the other tools for pathogenic variants that are typically located in lincRNAs, pseudogenes and other parts of the non-coding genome. However, all tools had low precision, which could potentially be improved by future non-coding genome feature discoveries. These results may have been influenced by the presence of potential benign variants in the COSMIC database. The development of a gold standard as consistent as ClinVar for these regions will be necessary to confirm our tool ranking.

Availability and implementation

The Snakemake, C++ and R codes are freely available from https://github.com/Oncostat/BenchmarkNCVTools and supported on Linux.

Contact

damien.drubay@gustaveroussy.fr or stefan.michiels@gustaveroussy.fr.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Mismatch repair prefers exons

A new analysis of cancer genomes identifies a decrease in the mutation burden of exons, but not introns, as compared to expectation. This difference can be explained by preferential recruitment of the DNA mismatch repair machinery to a protein modification that marks exons.

The Identification and Interpretation of cis-Regulatory Noncoding Mutations in Cancer

In the need to characterise the genomic landscape of cancers and to establish novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets, studies have largely focused on the identification of driver mutations within the protein-coding gene regions, where the most pathogenic alterations are known to occur. However, the noncoding genome is significantly larger than its protein-coding counterpart, and evidence reveals that regulatory sequences also harbour functional mutations that significantly affect the regulation of genes and pathways implicated in cancer. Due to the sheer number of noncoding mutations (NCMs) and the limited knowledge of regulatory element functionality in cancer genomes, differentiating pathogenic mutations from background passenger noise is particularly challenging technically and computationally. Here we review various up-to-date high-throughput sequencing data/studies and in silico methods that can be employed to interrogate the noncoding genome. We aim to provide an overview of available data resources as well as computational and molecular techniques that can help and guide the search for functional NCMs in cancer genomes.

Quantification of somatic mutation flow across individual cell division events by lineage sequencing

Mutation data reveal the dynamic equilibrium between DNA damage and repair processes in cells and are indispensable to the understanding of age-related diseases, tumor evolution, and the acquisition of drug resistance. However, available genome-wide methods have a limited ability to resolve rare somatic variants and the relationships between these variants. Here, we present lineage sequencing, a new genome sequencing approach that enables somatic event reconstruction by providing quality somatic mutation call sets with resolution as high as the single-cell level in subject lineages. Lineage sequencing entails sampling single cells from a population and sequencing subclonal sample sets derived from these cells such that knowledge of relationships among the cells can be used to jointly call variants across the sample set. This approach integrates data from multiple sequence libraries to support each variant and precisely assigns mutations to lineage segments. We applied lineage sequencing to a human colon cancer cell line with a DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) proofreading deficiency (HT115) and a human retinal epithelial cell line immortalized by constitutive telomerase expression (RPE1). Cells were cultured under continuous observation to link observed single-cell phenotypes with single-cell mutation data. The high sensitivity, specificity, and resolution of the data provide a unique opportunity for quantitative analysis of variation in mutation rate, spectrum, and correlations among variants. Our data show that mutations arrive with nonuniform probability across sublineages and that DNA lesion dynamics may cause strong correlations between certain mutations.

A pan-cancer atlas of cancer hallmark-associated candidate driver lncRNAs

Substantial cancer genome sequencing efforts have discovered many important driver genes contributing to tumorigenesis. However, very little is known about the genetic alterations of long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer. Thus, there is a need for systematic surveys of driver lncRNAs. Through integrative analysis of 5918 tumors across 11 cancer types, we revealed that lncRNAs have undergone dramatic genomic alterations, many of which are mutually exclusive with well‐known cancer genes. Using the hypothesis of functional redundancy of mutual exclusivity, we developed a computational framework to identify driver lncRNAs associated with different cancer hallmarks. Applying it to pan‐cancer data, we identified 378 candidate driver lncRNAs whose genomic features highly resemble the known cancer driver genes (e.g. high conservation and early replication). We further validated the candidate driver lncRNAs involved in ‘Tissue Invasion and Metastasis’ in lung adenocarcinoma and breast cancer, and also highlighted their potential roles in improving clinical outcomes. In summary, we have generated a comprehensive landscape of cancer candidate driver lncRNAs that could act as a starting point for future functional explorations, as well as the identification of biomarkers and lncRNA‐based target therapy.

GAEC1 mutations and copy number aberration is associated with biological aggressiveness of colorectal cancer

GAEC1 (gene amplified in oesophageal cancer 1) is a transforming oncogene with tumorigenic potential observed in both oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, there has been a lack of study done on this gene to understand how this gene exert its oncogenic properties in cancer. This study aims to identify novel mutation sites in GAEC1. To do so, seventy-nine matched colorectal cancers were tested for GAEC1 mutation via Sanger sequencing. The mutations noted were investigated for the correlations with the clinicopathological parameters of the patients with the cancer. Additionally, GAEC1 copy number aberration (CNA), mRNA and protein expression were determined with the use of droplet digital (dd) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time PCR and Western blot (confirmed with immunofluorescence analysis). GAEC1 mutation was noted in 8.8% (n = 7/79) of the cancer tissues including one missense mutation, four loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and two substitutions. These mutations were significantly associated with cancer perforation (p = 0.021). GAEC1 mutation is frequently associated with increased GAEC1 protein expression. Nevertheless, GAEC1 mRNA and protein are only weakly associated. Taken together, GAEC1 mutation affects GAEC1 expression and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. This further strengthens the role of GAEC1 as an oncogene.

Reduced mutation rate in exons due to differential mismatch repair

While recent studies have identified higher than anticipated heterogeneity of mutation rate across genomic regions, mutations in exons and introns are assumed to be generated at the same rate. Here we find fewer somatic mutations in exons than expected from their sequence content and demonstrate that this is not due to purifying selection. Instead, we show that it is caused by higher mismatch-repair activity in exonic than in intronic regions. Our findings have important implications for understanding of mutational and DNA repair processes and knowledge of the evolution of eukaryotic genes, and they have practical ramifications for the study of evolution of both tumors and species.

A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling

BACKGROUND

Significant clinical and research applications are driving large scale adoption of individualized tumor sequencing in cancer in order to identify tumors-specific mutations. When a matched germline sample is available, somatic mutations may be identified using comparative callers. However, matched germline samples are frequently not available such as with archival tissues, which makes it difficult to distinguish somatic from germline variants. While population databases may be used to filter out known germline variants, recent studies have shown private germline variants result in an inflated false positive rate in unmatched tumor samples, and the number germline false positives in an individual may be related to ancestry.

METHODS

First, we examined the relationship between the germline false positives and ancestry. Then we developed and implemented a tumor only caller (LumosVar) that leverages differences in allelic frequency between somatic and germline variants in impure tumors. We used simulated data to systematically examine how copy number alterations, tumor purity, and sequencing depth should affect the sensitivity of our caller. Finally, we evaluated the caller on real data.

RESULTS

We find the germline false-positive rate is significantly higher for individuals of non-European Ancestry largely due to the limited diversity in public polymorphism databases and due to population-specific characteristics such as admixture or recent expansions. Our Bayesian tumor only caller (LumosVar) is able to greatly reduce false positives from private germline variants, and our sensitivity is similar to predictions based on simulated data.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our results suggest that studies of individuals of non-European ancestry would most benefit from our approach. However, high sensitivity requires sufficiently impure tumors and adequate sequencing depth. Even in impure tumors, there are copy number alterations that result in germline and somatic variants having similar allele frequencies, limiting the sensitivity of the approach. We believe our approach could greatly improve the analysis of archival samples in a research setting where the normal is not available.