1
|
Schmidt AD, Miciano C, Zheng Q, Mathyer ME, Grice EA, de Guzman Strong C. Involucrin Modulates Vitamin D Receptor Activity in the Epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 2023; 143:1052-1061.e3. [PMID: 36642403 PMCID: PMC10240284 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Terminally differentiated keratinocytes are critical for epidermal function and are surrounded by involucrin (IVL). Increased IVL expression is associated with a near-selective sweep in European populations compared with those in Africa. This positive selection for increased IVL in the epidermis identifies human adaptation outside of Africa. The functional significance is unclear. We hypothesize that IVL modulates the environmentally sensitive vitamin D receptor (VDR) in the epidermis. We investigated VDR activity in Ivl‒/‒ and wild-type mice using vitamin D agonist (MC903) treatment and comprehensively determined the inflammatory response using single-cell RNA sequencing and associated skin microbiome changes using 16S bacterial phylotyping. VDR activity and target gene expression were reduced in Ivl‒/‒ mouse skin, with decreased MC903-mediated skin inflammation and significant reductions in CD4+ T cells, basophils, macrophages, monocytes, and type II basal keratinocytes and an increase in suprabasal keratinocytes. Coinciding with the dampened MC903-mediated inflammation, the skin microbiota of Ivl‒/‒ mice was more stable than that of the wild-type mice, which exhibited an MC903-responsive increase in Bacteroidetes and a decrease in Firmicutes. Together, our studies in Ivl‒/‒ mice identify a functional role for IVL to positively impact VDR activity and suggest an emerging IVL/VDR paradigm for adaptation in the human epidermis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina D Schmidt
- Division of Dermatology, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for the Study of Itch & Sensory Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charlene Miciano
- Division of Dermatology, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for the Study of Itch & Sensory Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Qi Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary Elizabeth Mathyer
- Division of Dermatology, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for the Study of Itch & Sensory Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Grice
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cristina de Guzman Strong
- Division of Dermatology, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for Pharmacogenomics, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for the Study of Itch & Sensory Disorders, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Center for Cutaneous Biology and Immunology Research, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Immunology Program, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uberoi A, Bartow-McKenney C, Zheng Q, Flowers L, Campbell A, Knight SAB, Chan N, Wei M, Lovins V, Bugayev J, Horwinski J, Bradley C, Meyer J, Crumrine D, Sutter CH, Elias P, Mauldin E, Sutter TR, Grice EA. Commensal microbiota regulates skin barrier function and repair via signaling through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Cell Host Microbe 2021; 29:1235-1248.e8. [PMID: 34214492 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The epidermis forms a barrier that defends the body from desiccation and entry of harmful substances, while also sensing and integrating environmental signals. The tightly orchestrated cellular changes needed for the formation and maintenance of this epidermal barrier occur in the context of the skin microbiome. Using germ-free mice, we demonstrate the microbiota is necessary for proper differentiation and repair of the epidermal barrier. These effects are mediated by microbiota signaling through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) in keratinocytes, a xenobiotic receptor also implicated in epidermal differentiation. Mice lacking keratinocyte AHR are more susceptible to barrier damage and infection, during steady-state and epicutaneous sensitization. Colonization with a defined consortium of human skin isolates restored barrier competence in an AHR-dependent manner. We reveal a fundamental mechanism whereby the microbiota regulates skin barrier formation and repair, which has far-reaching implications for the numerous skin disorders characterized by epidermal barrier dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aayushi Uberoi
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Casey Bartow-McKenney
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Qi Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Laurice Flowers
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Amy Campbell
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Simon A B Knight
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Neal Chan
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Monica Wei
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Victoria Lovins
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Julia Bugayev
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Horwinski
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Charles Bradley
- Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Jason Meyer
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dermatology Service, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Debra Crumrine
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dermatology Service, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Carrie Hayes Sutter
- Department of Biological Sciences, W. Harry Feinstone Center for Genomic Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Peter Elias
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dermatology Service, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mauldin
- Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Thomas R Sutter
- Department of Biological Sciences, W. Harry Feinstone Center for Genomic Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Grice
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zheng Q, Capell BC, Parekh V, O'Day C, Atillasoy C, Bashir HM, Yeh C, Shim EH, Prouty SM, Dentchev T, Lee V, Wushanley L, Kweon Y, Suzuki-Horiuchi Y, Pear W, Grice EA, Seykora JT. Whole-Exome and Transcriptome Analysis of UV-Exposed Epidermis and Carcinoma In Situ Reveals Early Drivers of Carcinogenesis. J Invest Dermatol 2020; 141:295-307.e13. [PMID: 32649944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.05.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) is a prevalent precancerous lesion that can progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Although SCCIS is common, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. To better understand SCCIS development, we performed laser captured microdissection of human SCCIS and the adjacent epidermis to isolate genomic DNA and RNA for next-generation sequencing. Whole-exome sequencing identified UV-signature mutations in multiple genes, including NOTCH1-3 in the epidermis and SCCIS and oncogenic TP53 mutations in SCCIS. Gene families, including SLFN genes, contained UV/oxidative-signature disruptive epidermal mutations that manifested positive selection in SCCIS. The frequency and distribution of NOTCH and TP53 mutations indicate that NOTCH mutations may precede TP53 mutations. RNA sequencing identified 1,166 differentially expressed genes; the top five enriched gene ontology biological processes included (i) immune response, (ii) epidermal development, (iii) protein phosphorylation, (iv) regulation of catalytic activity, and (v) cytoskeletal regulation. The NEURL1 ubiquitin ligase, which targets Notch ligands for degradation, was upregulated in SCCIS. NEURL1 protein was found to be elevated in SCCIS suggesting that increased levels could represent a mechanism for downregulating Notch during UV-induced carcinogenesis. The data from DNA and RNA sequencing of epidermis and SCCIS provide insights regarding SCCIS formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian C Capell
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vishwas Parekh
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Conor O'Day
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cem Atillasoy
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hasan M Bashir
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Yeh
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eun-Hee Shim
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stephen M Prouty
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tzvete Dentchev
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vivian Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lily Wushanley
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yerin Kweon
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yoko Suzuki-Horiuchi
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Warren Pear
- Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Grice
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John T Seykora
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chowdhury HA, Bhattacharyya DK, Kalita JK. Differential Expression Analysis of RNA-seq Reads: Overview, Taxonomy, and Tools. IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS 2020; 17:566-586. [PMID: 30281477 DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2018.2873010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Analysis of RNA-sequence (RNA-seq) data is widely used in transcriptomic studies and it has many applications. We review RNA-seq data analysis from RNA-seq reads to the results of differential expression analysis. In addition, we perform a descriptive comparison of tools used in each step of RNA-seq data analysis along with a discussion of important characteristics of these tools. A taxonomy of tools is also provided. A discussion of issues in quality control and visualization of RNA-seq data is also included along with useful tools. Finally, we provide some guidelines for the RNA-seq data analyst, along with research issues and challenges which should be addressed.
Collapse
|
5
|
VanRaden PM, Bickhart DM, O'Connell JR. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data. J Dairy Sci 2019; 102:3216-3229. [PMID: 30772032 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing studies can identify causative mutations for subsequent use in genomic evaluations. Speed and accuracy of sequence alignment can be improved by accounting for known variant locations during alignment instead of calling the variants after alignment as in previous programs. The new programs Findmap and Findvar were compared with alignment using Burrows-Wheeler alignment (BWA) or SNAP and variant identification using Genome Analysis ToolKit (GATK) or SAMtools. Findmap stores the reference map and any known variant locations while aligning reads and counting reference and alternate alleles for each DNA source. Findmap also outputs potential new single nucleotide variant, insertion, and deletion alleles. Findvar separates likely true variants from read errors and outputs genotype probabilities. Strategies were tested using cattle, human, and a completely random reference map and simulated or actual data. Most tests simulated 10 bulls, each with 10× simulated sequence reads containing 39 million variants from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project. With 10 processors, clock times for processing 100× data were 105 h for BWA, 25 h for GATK, and 11 h for SAMtools but only about 4 h for SNAP, 3 h for Findmap, and 1 h for Findvar. Alignment programs required about the same total memory; BWA used 46 GB (4.6 GB/processor), whereas >10 processors can share the same memory in SNAP and Findmap, which used 40 and 46 GB, respectively. Findmap correctly mapped 92.9% of reads (compared with 92.6% from SNAP and 90.5% from BWA) and had high accuracy of calling alleles for known variants. For new variants, Findvar found 99.8% of single nucleotide variants, 79% of insertions, and 67% of deletions; GATK found 99.4, 95, and 90%, respectively; and SAMtools found 99.8, 12, and 16%, respectively. False positives (as percentages of true variants) were 11% of single nucleotide variants, 0.4% of insertions, and 0.3% of deletions from Findvar; 12, 8.4, and 2.9%, respectively, from GATK; and 37, 1.3, and 0.4%, respectively, from SAMtools. Advantages of Findmap and Findvar are fast processing, precise alignment, more useful data summaries, more compact output, and fewer steps. Calling known variants during alignment allows more efficient and accurate sequence-based genotyping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M VanRaden
- USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350.
| | - D M Bickhart
- USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
| | - J R O'Connell
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grau JH, Hackl T, Koepfli KP, Hofreiter M. Improving draft genome contiguity with reference-derived in silico mate-pair libraries. Gigascience 2018; 7:4980916. [PMID: 29688527 PMCID: PMC5967465 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Contiguous genome assemblies are a highly valued biological resource because of the higher number of completely annotated genes and genomic elements that are usable compared to fragmented draft genomes. Nonetheless, contiguity is difficult to obtain if only low coverage data and/or only distantly related reference genome assemblies are available. Findings In order to improve genome contiguity, we have developed Cross-Species Scaffolding—a new pipeline that imports long-range distance information directly into the de novo assembly process by constructing mate-pair libraries in silico. Conclusions We show how genome assembly metrics and gene prediction dramatically improve with our pipeline by assembling two primate genomes solely based on ∼30x coverage of shotgun sequencing data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Horacio Grau
- Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Invalidenstraße 43, 10115. Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Hackl
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 15 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Klaus-Peter Koepfli
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 3001 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20008, USA.,Theodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, Sredniy Prospekt 41A, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russia
| | - Michael Hofreiter
- Faculty of Mathematics and Life Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Unit of General Zoology-Evolutionary Adaptive Genomics, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meisel JS, Sfyroera G, Bartow-McKenney C, Gimblet C, Bugayev J, Horwinski J, Kim B, Brestoff JR, Tyldsley AS, Zheng Q, Hodkinson BP, Artis D, Grice EA. Commensal microbiota modulate gene expression in the skin. MICROBIOME 2018; 6:20. [PMID: 29378633 PMCID: PMC5789709 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The skin harbors complex communities of resident microorganisms, yet little is known of their physiological roles and the molecular mechanisms that mediate cutaneous host-microbe interactions. Here, we profiled skin transcriptomes of mice reared in the presence and absence of microbiota to elucidate the range of pathways and functions modulated in the skin by the microbiota. RESULTS A total of 2820 genes were differentially regulated in response to microbial colonization and were enriched in gene ontology (GO) terms related to the host-immune response and epidermal differentiation. Innate immune response genes and genes involved in cytokine activity were generally upregulated in response to microbiota and included genes encoding toll-like receptors, antimicrobial peptides, the complement cascade, and genes involved in IL-1 family cytokine signaling and homing of T cells. Our results also reveal a role for the microbiota in modulating epidermal differentiation and development, with differential expression of genes in the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC). Genes with correlated co-expression patterns were enriched in binding sites for the transcription factors Klf4, AP-1, and SP-1, all implicated as regulators of epidermal differentiation. Finally, we identified transcriptional signatures of microbial regulation common to both the skin and the gastrointestinal tract. CONCLUSIONS With this foundational approach, we establish a critical resource for understanding the genome-wide implications of microbially mediated gene expression in the skin and emphasize prospective ways in which the microbiome contributes to skin health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacquelyn S Meisel
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Georgia Sfyroera
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Casey Bartow-McKenney
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ciara Gimblet
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Julia Bugayev
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Joseph Horwinski
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Brian Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jonathan R Brestoff
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Amanda S Tyldsley
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Qi Zheng
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Brendan P Hodkinson
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - David Artis
- Jill Roberts Institute for Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Grice
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 421 Curie Blvd, 1015 BRB II/III, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee H, Lee KW, Lee T, Park D, Chung J, Lee C, Park WY, Son DS. Performance evaluation method for read mapping tool in clinical panel sequencing. Genes Genomics 2017; 40:189-197. [PMID: 29568413 PMCID: PMC5846869 DOI: 10.1007/s13258-017-0621-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
In addition to the rapid advancement in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology, clinical panel sequencing is being used increasingly in clinical studies and tests. However, tools that are used in NGS data analysis have not been comparatively evaluated in performance for panel sequencing. This study aimed to evaluate the tools used in the alignment process, the first procedure in bioinformatics analysis, by comparing tools that have been widely used with ones that have been introduced recently. With the accumulated panel sequencing data, detected variant lists were cataloged and inserted into simulated reads produced from the reference genome (h19). The amount of unmapped reads and misaligned reads, mapping quality distribution, and runtime were measured as standards for comparison. As the most widely used tools, Bowtie2 and BWA–MEM each showed explicit performance with AUC of 0.9984 and 0.9970 respectively. Kart, maintaining superior runtime and less number of misaligned read, also similarly possessed high level of AUC (0.9723). Such selection and optimization method of tools appropriate for panel sequencing can be utilized for fields requiring error minimization, such as clinical application and liquid biopsy studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojun Lee
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Ki-Wook Lee
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea.,2Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Taeseob Lee
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Donghyun Park
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Jongsuk Chung
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea.,3Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16419 South Korea
| | - Chung Lee
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea.,4Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Woong-Yang Park
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea.,3Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16419 South Korea.,4Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| | - Dae-Soon Son
- 1Samsung Genome Institute (SGI), Samsung Medical Center (SMC), Seoul, 06351 South Korea
| |
Collapse
|