Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers dose-dependent homeostatic rewiring in recurrent neuronal networks

Ultra-early navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for perioperative stroke: anatomo-functional report

Navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation is a non-invasive and safe brain activity modulation technique. When combined with the classical rehabilitation process in stroke patients it has the potential to enhance the overall neurologic recovery. We present a case of a peri-operative stroke, treated with ultra-early low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation over the contralesional hemisphere. The patient received low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation within 12 hours of stroke onset for seven consecutive days and a significant improvement in his right sided weakness was noticed and he was discharge with normal power. This was accompanied by an increase in the number of positive responses evoked by navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation and a decrease of the resting motor thresholds at a cortical level. Subcortically, a decrease in the radial, axial, and mean diffusivity were recorded in the ipsilateral corticospinal tract and an increase in fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and mean diffusivity was observed in the interhemispheric fibers of the corpus callosum responsible for the interhemispheric connectivity between motor areas. Our case demonstrates clearly that ultra-early low frequency navigated repetitive transmagnetic stimulation applied to the contralateral motor cortex can lead to significant clinical motor improvement in patients with subcortical stroke.

Coordinated reset stimulation of plastic neural networks with spatially dependent synaptic connections

Background

Abnormal neuronal synchrony is associated with several neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor, dystonia, and epilepsy. Coordinated reset (CR) stimulation was developed computationally to counteract abnormal neuronal synchrony. During CR stimulation, phase-shifted stimuli are delivered to multiple stimulation sites. Computational studies in plastic neural networks reported that CR stimulation drove the networks into an attractor of a stable desynchronized state by down-regulating synaptic connections, which led to long-lasting desynchronization effects that outlasted stimulation. Later, corresponding long-lasting desynchronization and therapeutic effects were found in animal models of PD and PD patients. To date, it is unclear how spatially dependent synaptic connections, as typically observed in the brain, shape CR-induced synaptic downregulation and long-lasting effects.

Methods

We performed numerical simulations of networks of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with spike-timing-dependent plasticity and spatially dependent synaptic connections to study and further improve acute and long-term responses to CR stimulation.

Results

The characteristic length scale of synaptic connections relative to the distance between stimulation sites plays a key role in CR parameter adjustment. In networks with short synaptic length scales, a substantial synaptic downregulation can be achieved by selecting appropriate stimulus-related parameters, such as the stimulus amplitude and shape, regardless of the employed spatiotemporal pattern of stimulus deliveries. Complex stimulus shapes can induce local connectivity patterns in the vicinity of the stimulation sites. In contrast, in networks with longer synaptic length scales, the spatiotemporal sequence of stimulus deliveries is of major importance for synaptic downregulation. In particular, rapid shuffling of the stimulus sequence is advantageous for synaptic downregulation.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that CR stimulation parameters can be adjusted to synaptic connectivity to further improve the long-lasting effects. Furthermore, shuffling of CR sequences is advantageous for long-lasting desynchronization effects. Our work provides important hypotheses on CR parameter selection for future preclinical and clinical studies.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Importance

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) interventions have been shown to be efficacious in several mental disorders, but the optimal dose stimulation parameters for each disorder are unknown.

Objective

To define NIBS dose stimulation parameters associated with the greatest efficacy in symptom improvement across mental disorders.

Data Sources

Studies were drawn from an updated (to April 30, 2023) previous systematic review based on a search of PubMed, OVID, and Web of Knowledge.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials were selected that tested transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for any mental disorder in adults aged 18 years or older.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two authors independently extracted the data. A 1-stage dose-response meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test robustness of the findings. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the near-maximal effective doses of total pulses received for TMS and total current dose in coulombs for tDCS.

Results

A total of 110 studies with 4820 participants (2659 men [61.4%]; mean [SD] age, 42.3 [8.8] years) were included. The following significant dose-response associations emerged with bell-shaped curves: (1) in schizophrenia, high-frequency (HF) TMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) for negative symptoms (χ2 = 9.35; df = 2; P = .009) and TMS on the left temporoparietal junction for resistant hallucinations (χ2 = 36.52; df = 2; P < .001); (2) in depression, HF-DLPFC TMS (χ2 = 14.49; df = 2; P < .001); (3) in treatment-resistant depression, LDLPFC tDCS (χ2 = 14.56; df = 2; P < .001); and (4) in substance use disorder, LDLPFC tDCS (χ2 = 33.63; df = 2; P < .001). The following significant dose-response associations emerged with plateaued or ascending curves: (1) in depression, low-frequency (LF) TMS on the right DLPFC (RDLPFC) with ascending curve (χ2 = 25.67; df = 2; P = .001); (2) for treatment-resistant depression, LF TMS on the bilateral DLPFC with ascending curve (χ2 = 5.86; df = 2; P = .004); (3) in obsessive-compulsive disorder, LF-RDLPFC TMS with ascending curve (χ2 = 20.65; df = 2; P < .001) and LF TMS on the orbitofrontal cortex with a plateaued curve (χ2 = 15.19; df = 2; P < .001); and (4) in posttraumatic stress disorder, LF-RDLPFC TMS with ascending curve (χ2 = 54.15; df = 2; P < .001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main findings.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study findings suggest that NIBS yields specific outcomes based on dose parameters across various mental disorders and brain regions. Clinicians should consider these dose parameters when prescribing NIBS. Additional research is needed to prospectively validate the findings in randomized, sham-controlled trials and explore how other parameters contribute to the observed dose-response association.

Neurostimulation targeting the epileptic focus: Current understanding and perspectives for treatment

For the one third of people with epilepsy whose seizures are not controlled with medications, targeting the seizure focus with neurostimulation can be an effective therapeutic strategy. In this focused review, we summarize a discussion of targeted neurostimulation modalities during a workshop held in Frankfurt, Germany in September 2023. Topics covered include: available devices for seizure focus stimulation; alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) stimulation to reduce focal cortical excitability; modeling approaches to simulate DC stimulation; reconciling the efficacy of focal stimulation with the network theory of epilepsy; and the emerging concept of 'neurostimulation zones,' which are defined as cortical regions where focal stimulation is most effective for reducing seizures and which may or may not directly involve the seizure onset zone. By combining experimental data, modeling results, and clinical outcome analysis, rational selection of target regions and stimulation parameters is increasingly feasible, paving the way for a broader use of neurostimulation for epilepsy in the future.

The association of total pulses with the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression: A dose-response meta-analysis

AIM

This study aimed to examine dose-effects of total pulses on improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) receiving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were systematically searched. We included randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCT) that used rTMS over left DLPFC in patients with TRD. Excluded studies were non-TRD, non-RCTs, or combined other brain stimulation interventions. The outcome of interest was the difference between rTMS arms and sham controls in improvement of depressive symptoms in a dose-response manner. A random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-analysis(DRMA) was used to examine antidepressant efficacy of rTMS and association with total pulses.

RESULTS

We found that rTMS over left DLPFC is superior to sham controls (reported as standardized mean difference[SMD] with 95% confidence interval: 0.77; 0.56-0.98). The best-fitting model of DRMA was bell-shaped (estimated using restricted cubic spline model; R2 =0.42), indicating that higher doses (>26,660 total pulses) were not associated with increased improvement of depressive symptoms. Stimulation frequency(R2 =0.53) and age(R2 =0.51) were significant moderators for the dose-response curve. Furthermore, 15-20 Hz rTMS was superior to 10 Hz rTMS (0.61, 0.15-1.10) when combining all doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest higher doses(total pulses) of rTMS were not always associated with increased improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with TRD, and that the dose-response relationship was moderated by stimulation frequency and age. These associations emphasize the importance of determining dosing parameters to achieve maximum efficacy.