Silencing of DNase Colicin E8 Gene Expression by a Complex Nucleoprotein Assembly Ensures Timely Colicin Induction

Fe-S cluster homeostasis and beyond: The multifaceted roles of IscR

The role of IscR in regulating the transcription of genes involved in Fe-S cluster homeostasis has been well established for the model organism Escherichia coli K12. In this bacterium, IscR coordinates expression of the Isc and Suf Fe-S cluster assembly pathways to meet cellular Fe-S cluster demands shaped by a variety of environmental cues. However, since its initial discovery nearly 25 years ago, there has been growing evidence that IscR function extends well beyond Fe-S cluster homeostasis, not only in E. coli, but in bacteria of diverse lifestyles. Notably, pathogenic bacteria have exploited the ability of IscR to respond to changes in oxygen tension, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and iron availability to navigate their trajectory in their respective hosts as changes in these cues are frequently encountered during host infection. In this review, we highlight these broader roles of IscR in different cellular processes and, in particular, discuss the importance of IscR as a virulence factor for many bacterial pathogens.

Homodimerization and heterodimerization requirements of Acinetobacter baumannii SOS response coregulators UmuDAb and DdrR revealed by two-hybrid analyses

The multidrug-resistant pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii displays unusual control of its SOS mutagenesis genes, as it does not encode a LexA repressor, but instead employs the UmuDAb repressor and a small protein, DdrR, that is uniquely found in Acinetobacter species. We used bacterial adenylate cyclase two-hybrid analyses to determine if UmuDAb and DdrR coregulation might involve physical interactions. Neither quantitative nor qualitative assays showed UmuDAb interaction with DdrR. DdrR hybrid proteins, however, demonstrated modest head-to-tail interactions in a qualitative assay. The similarity of UmuDAb to the homodimer-forming polymerase manager UmuD and LexA repressor proteins suggested that it may form dimers, which we observed. UmuDAb homodimerization required a free C terminus, and either small truncations or addition of a histidine tag at the C terminus abolished this homodimerization. The amino acid N100, crucial for UmuD dimer formation, was dispensable if both C termini were free to interact. However, mutation of the amino acid G124, necessary for LexA dimerization, yielded significantly less UmuDAb dimerization, even if both C termini were free. This suggests that UmuDAb forms dimers like LexA does, but may not coregulate gene expression involving a physical association with DdrR. The homodimerization of these coregulators provides insight into a LexA-independent, coregulatory process of controlling a conserved bacterial action such as the mutagenic DNA damage response.

The molecular effects of ultrasound on the expression of cellular proteome

High frequency and low intensity, diagnostic ultrasound methods are recognized to be safe in epidemiology and pathology but the bioeffects of these methods on molecular and proteomic levels are unknown. As a representative organism that can directly reflect the molecular response to stresses, Escherichia coli was selected for exposure to ultrasound probes C1-5, M5s and 9 L for 10 min and 20 min. ITRAQ was used to measure the expression of the cellular proteome. The results showed that both the frequency and time of exposure to ultrasound affected the proteome expression. Fifty biological processes were affected and nineteen metabolic processes, including carbohydrate metabolism, asparagine metabolism and phosphate import were differentially regulated. Lower frequency ultrasound caused copper export and iron‑sulfur cluster biosynthesis upregulation. Nine proteins (GlpD, AsnB, TdcB, CopA, IscR, IscU, IscS, IscA, RecA) were key for the adaption to ultrasound. Accordingly, the results of the potential risks based on the calculation of the orthologous genome clarified that relevant pathways and potentially sensitive individuals were worthy of further study. These findings offer insights into reveal the bioeffects of ultrasound at the metabolic network and proteomic levels.

A corepressor participates in LexA-independent regulation of error-prone polymerases in Acinetobacter

The DNA damage response of the multidrug-resistant pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii, which induces mutagenic UmuD'2C error-prone polymerases, differs from that of many bacteria. Acinetobacter species lack a LexA repressor, but induce gene transcription after DNA damage. One regulator, UmuDAb, binds to and represses the promoters of the multiple A. baumannii ATCC 17978 umuDC alleles and the divergently transcribed umuDAb and ddrR genes. ddrR is unique to the genus Acinetobacter and of unknown function. 5' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) PCR mapping of the umuDAb and ddrR transcriptional start sites revealed that their -35 promoter elements overlapped the UmuDAb binding site, suggesting that UmuDAb simultaneously repressed expression of both genes by blocking polymerase access. This coordinated control of ddrR and umuDAb suggested that ddrR might also regulate DNA damage-inducible gene transcription. RNA-sequencing experiments in 17 978 ddrR- cells showed that ddrR regulated approximately 25 % (n=39) of the mitomycin C-induced regulon, with umuDAb coregulating 17 of these ddrR-regulated genes. Eight genes (the umuDC polymerases, umuDAb and ddrR) were de-repressed in the absence of DNA damage, and nine genes were uninduced in the presence of DNA damage, in both ddrR and umuDAb mutant strains. These data suggest ddrR has multiple roles, both as a co-repressor and as a positive regulator of DNA damage-inducible gene transcription. Additionally, 57 genes were induced by mitomycin C in the ddrR mutant but not in wild-type cells. This regulon contained multiple genes for DNA replication, recombination and repair, transcriptional regulators, RND efflux, and transport. This study uncovered another regulator of the atypical DNA damage response of this genus, to help describe how this pathogen acquires drug resistance through its expression of the error-prone polymerases under DdrR and UmuDAb control.

Lytic gene expression in the temperate bacteriophage GIL01 is activated by a phage-encoded LexA homologue

The GIL01 bacteriophage is a temperate phage that infects the insect pathogen Bacillus thuringiensis. During the lytic cycle, phage gene transcription is initiated from three promoters: P1 and P2, which control the expression of the early phage genes involved in genome replication and P3, which controls the expression of the late genes responsible for virion maturation and host lysis. Unlike most temperate phages, GIL01 lysogeny is not maintained by a dedicated phage repressor but rather by the host's regulator of the SOS response, LexA. Previously we showed that the lytic cycle was induced by DNA damage and that LexA, in conjunction with phage-encoded protein gp7, repressed P1. Here we examine the lytic/lysogenic switch in more detail and show that P3 is also repressed by a LexA-gp7 complex, binding to tandem LexA boxes within the promoter. We also demonstrate that expression from P3 is considerably delayed after DNA damage, requiring the phage-encoded DNA binding protein, gp6. Surprisingly, gp6 is homologous to LexA itself and, thus, is a rare example of a LexA homologue directly activating transcription. We propose that the interplay between these two LexA family members, with opposing functions, ensures the timely expression of GIL01 phage late genes.

Evolutionary Stability of Salmonella Competition with the Gut Microbiota: How the Environment Fosters Heterogeneity in Exploitative and Interference Competition

Following ingestion, gastrointestinal pathogens compete against the gastrointestinal microbiota and overcome host immune defenses in order to cause infections. Besides employing direct killing mechanisms, the commensal microbiota occupies metabolic niches to outcompete invading pathogens. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) uses several strategies to successfully colonize the gut and establish infection, of which an increasing number is based on phenotypic heterogeneity within the S. Typhimurium population. The utilization of myo-inositol (MI) and the production of colicin confer a selective advantage over the microbiota in terms of exploitative and interference competition, respectively. In this review, we summarize the genetic basis underlying bistability of MI catabolism and colicin production. As demonstrated by single-cell analyses, a stochastic switch in the expression of the genes responsible for colicin production and MI degradation constitutes the heterogeneity of the two phenotypes. Both genetic systems are tightly regulated to avoid their expression under non-appropriate conditions and possible detrimental effects on bacterial fitness. Moreover, evolutionary mechanisms underlying formation and stability of these phenotypes in S. Typhimurium are discussed. We propose that both MI catabolism and colicin production create a bet-hedging strategy, which provides an adaptive benefit for S. Typhimurium in the fluctuating environment of the mammalian gut.

Bacterial Transcription Factors: Regulation by Pick "N" Mix

Transcription in most bacteria is tightly regulated in order to facilitate bacterial adaptation to different environments, and transcription factors play a key role in this. Here we give a brief overview of the essential features of bacterial transcription factors and how they affect transcript initiation at target promoters. We focus on complex promoters that are regulated by combinations of activators and repressors, combinations of repressors only, or combinations of activators. At some promoters, transcript initiation is regulated by nucleoid-associated proteins, which often work together with transcription factors. We argue that the distinction between nucleoid-associated proteins and transcription factors is blurred and that they likely share common origins.

CsrA and its regulators control the time-point of ColicinE2 release in Escherichia coli

The bacterial SOS response is a cellular reaction to DNA damage, that, among other actions, triggers the expression of colicin - toxic bacteriocins in Escherichia coli that are released to kill close relatives competing for resources. However, it is largely unknown, how the complex network regulating toxin expression controls the time-point of toxin release to prevent premature release of inefficient protein concentrations. Here, we study how different regulatory mechanisms affect production and release of the bacteriocin ColicinE2 in Escherichia coli. Combining experimental and theoretical approaches, we demonstrate that the global carbon storage regulator CsrA controls the duration of the delay between toxin production and release and emphasize the importance of CsrA sequestering elements for the timing of ColicinE2 release. In particular, we show that ssDNA originating from rolling-circle replication of the toxin-producing plasmid represents a yet unknown additional CsrA sequestering element, which is essential in the ColicinE2-producing strain to enable toxin release by reducing the amount of free CsrA molecules in the bacterial cell. Taken together, our findings show that CsrA times ColicinE2 release and reveal a dual function for CsrA as an ssDNA and mRNA-binding protein, introducing ssDNA as an important post-transcriptional gene regulatory element.

Role of the Extremolytes Ectoine and Hydroxyectoine as Stress Protectants and Nutrients: Genetics, Phylogenomics, Biochemistry, and Structural Analysis

Fluctuations in environmental osmolarity are ubiquitous stress factors in many natural habitats of microorganisms, as they inevitably trigger osmotically instigated fluxes of water across the semi-permeable cytoplasmic membrane. Under hyperosmotic conditions, many microorganisms fend off the detrimental effects of water efflux and the ensuing dehydration of the cytoplasm and drop in turgor through the accumulation of a restricted class of organic osmolytes, the compatible solutes. Ectoine and its derivative 5-hydroxyectoine are prominent members of these compounds and are synthesized widely by members of the Bacteria and a few Archaea and Eukarya in response to high salinity/osmolarity and/or growth temperature extremes. Ectoines have excellent function-preserving properties, attributes that have led to their description as chemical chaperones and fostered the development of an industrial-scale biotechnological production process for their exploitation in biotechnology, skin care, and medicine. We review, here, the current knowledge on the biochemistry of the ectoine/hydroxyectoine biosynthetic enzymes and the available crystal structures of some of them, explore the genetics of the underlying biosynthetic genes and their transcriptional regulation, and present an extensive phylogenomic analysis of the ectoine/hydroxyectoine biosynthetic genes. In addition, we address the biochemistry, phylogenomics, and genetic regulation for the alternative use of ectoines as nutrients.

Transcriptional regulation of ectoine catabolism in response to multiple metabolic and environmental cues

Ectoine and hydroxyectoine are effective microbial osmostress protectants, but can also serve as versatile nutrients for bacteria. We have studied the genetic regulation of ectoine and hydroxyectoine import and catabolism in the marine Roseobacter species Ruegeria pomeroyi and identified three transcriptional regulators involved in these processes: the GabR/MocR-type repressor EnuR, the feast and famine-type regulator AsnC and the two-component system NtrYX. The corresponding genes are widely associated with ectoine and hydroxyectoine uptake and catabolic gene clusters (enuR, asnC), and with microorganisms predicted to consume ectoines (ntrYX). EnuR contains a covalently bound pyridoxal-5'-phosphate as a co-factor and the chemistry underlying the functioning of MocR/GabR-type regulators typically requires a system-specific low molecular mass effector molecule. Through ligand binding studies with purified EnuR, we identified N-(alpha)-L-acetyl-2,4-diaminobutyric acid and L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid as inducers for EnuR that are generated through ectoine catabolism. AsnC/Lrp-type proteins can wrap DNA into nucleosome-like structures, and we found that the asnC gene was essential for use of ectoines as nutrients. Furthermore, we discovered through transposon mutagenesis that the NtrYX two-component system is required for their catabolism. Database searches suggest that our findings have important ramifications for an understanding of the molecular biology of most microbial consumers of ectoines.

The Use and Abuse of LexA by Mobile Genetic Elements

The SOS response is an essential process for responding to DNA damage in bacteria. The expression of SOS genes is under the control of LexA, a global transcription factor that undergoes self-cleavage during stress to allow the expression of DNA repair functions and delay cell division until the damage is rectified. LexA also regulates genes that are not part of this cell rescue program, and the induction of bacteriophages, the movement of pathogenicity islands, and the expression of virulence factors and bacteriocins are all controlled by this important transcription factor. Recently it has emerged that when regulating the expression of genes from mobile genetic elements (MGEs), LexA often does so in concert with a corepressor. This accessory regulator can either be a host-encoded global transcription factor, which responds to various metabolic changes, or a factor that is encoded for by the MGE itself. Thus, the coupling of LexA-mediated regulation to a secondary transcription factor not only detaches LexA from its primary SOS role, but also fine-tunes gene expression from the MGE, enabling it to respond to multiple stresses. Here we discuss the mechanisms of such coordinated regulation and its implications for cells carrying such MGEs.