Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study

Causes of stillbirth in ethnically diverse women in a Perth metropolitan hospital: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Most published reports analysing the differences in causation of stillbirth between different ethnic groups focus on stillbirth risk factors, with a paucity of data comparing actual causes of stillbirth.

AIMS

To determine whether causes of stillbirth differ between Caucasian and non-Caucasian ethnic groups in an Australian context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from all stillbirths occurring at 20 or more completed weeks of gestation between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 at a secondary level, outer metropolitan hospital, were analysed in this retrospective case series. Causes of stillbirth as determined by perinatal autopsy and placental histopathology were categorised using the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification and compared between Caucasian and non-Caucasian groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-two stillbirths (0.7% of all births) were identified during the study period. A greater proportion of non-Caucasian women had small for gestation age placentas compared to Caucasian women (n = 22/43 (51%) vs n = 12/49 (24%); P = 0.025). A greater proportion of stillbirths were caused by hypoxic peripartum death in non-Caucasian than in Caucasian women (n = 4/43 (9%) vs n = 0/49 (0%); P = 0.044), and a greater prevalence of placental dysfunction was seen in the non-Caucasian cohort compared to Caucasian women (n = 14/43 (33%) vs n = 8/49 (16%); P = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences observed in causes of stillbirth between Caucasian and non-Caucasian women are hypothesis generating and warrant further larger-scale, multi-centred studies using standardised definitions and classification systems to determine whether these differences persist in a more representative sample.

The clinical performance and population health impact of birthweight-for-gestational age indices at term gestation

BACKGROUND

The assessment of birthweight for gestational age and the identification of small- and large-for-gestational age (SGA and LGA) infants remain contentious, despite the recent creation of the Intergrowth 21st Project and World Health Organisation (WHO) birthweight-for-gestational age standards.

OBJECTIVE

We carried out a study to identify birthweight-for-gestational age cut-offs, and corresponding population-based, Intergrowth 21st and WHO centiles associated with higher risks of adverse neonatal outcomes, and to evaluate their ability to predict serious neonatal morbidity and neonatal mortality (SNMM) at term gestation.

METHODS

The study population was based on non-anomalous, singleton live births between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation in the United States from 2003 to 2017. SNMM included 5-min Apgar score <4, neonatal seizures, need for assisted ventilation, and neonatal death. Birthweight-specific SNMM was modelled by gestational week using penalised B-splines. The birthweights at which SNMM odds were minimised (and higher by 10%, 50% and 100%) were estimated, and the corresponding population, Intergrowth 21st, and WHO centiles were identified. The clinical performance and population impact of these cut-offs for predicting SNMM were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 40,179,663 live births and 991,486 SNMM cases. Among female singletons at 39 weeks' gestation, SNMM odds was lowest at 3203 g birthweight, and 10% higher at 2835 g and 3685 g (population centiles 11th and 82nd, Intergrowth centiles 17th and 88th and WHO centiles 15th and 85th). Birthweight cut-offs were poor predictors of SNMM, for example, the cut-offs associated with 10% and 50% higher odds of SNMM among female singletons at 39 weeks' gestation resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and population attributable fraction of 12.5%, 89.4%, and 2.1%, and 2.9%, 98.4% and 1.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reference- and standard-based birthweight-for-gestational age indices and centiles perform poorly for predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in individual infants, and their associated population impact is also small.

Small for gestational age at preterm birth identifies adverse neonatal outcomes more reliably than antenatal suspicion of fetal growth restriction

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is an important reason for premature delivery and a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate whether classification as small for gestational age (SGA; <10th centile) at birth or antenatal suspicion of FGR was more strongly associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of infants born between 24 + 0 and 32 + 6 weeks of gestation from 2012-2019 and admitted to the Neonatal Unit at Mercy Hospital for Women (MHW). Infants were categorized according to whether FGR was listed as an antenatal complication in the medical records and whether they were SGA (<10th centile on Fenton chart) or appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at birth, and comparisons for neonatal outcomes were made.

RESULTS

371/2126 preterm infants (17.5%) had antenatal suspicion of FGR, and 166 (7.8%) were SGA at birth. No differences in any neonatal outcomes were found between infants with or without suspected FGR, except decreased intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in the FGR group. SGA classification was associated with increased rates of all morbidities other than IVH, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and necrotizing enterocolitis, compared with the AGA group. Death was significantly higher in the SGA group (7.2%) compared with the AGA group (3.5%).

CONCLUSION

SGA by Fenton chart more reliably identified neonates at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than antenatal suspicion of FGR, suggesting it is a reasonable clinical proxy. This most likely reflects the much lower tenth centile weight cutoffs on the Fenton charts compared to in-utero charts used antenatally to diagnose FGR based on ultrasound estimated fetal weight. SGA classification by Fenton approximately equates to <3rd centile on in-utero charts at our institution, therefore identifying the most severe FGR cases.

Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index

BACKGROUND

Appropriate growth charts are essential for fetal surveillance, to confirm that growth is proceeding normally and to identify pregnancies that are at risk. Many stillbirths are avoidable through antenatal detection of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. In the absence of an international consensus on which growth chart to use, it is essential that clinical practice reflects outcome-based evidence.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the performance of 4 internationally used fetal weight standards and their ability to identify stillbirth risk in different ethnic and maternal size groups of a heterogeneous population.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed routinely collected maternity data from more than 2.2 million pregnancies. Three population-based fetal weight standards (Hadlock, Intergrowth-21st, and World Health Organization) were compared with the customized GROW standard that was adjusted for maternal height, weight, parity, and ethnic origin. Small-for-gestational-age birthweight and stillbirth risk were determined for the 2 largest ethnic groups in our population (British European and South Asian), in 5 body mass index categories, and in 4 maternal size groups with normal body mass index (18.5-25.0 kg/m2). The differences in trend between stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age rates were assessed using the Clogg z test, and differences between stillbirths and body mass index groups were assessed using the chi-square trend test.

RESULTS

Stillbirth rates (per 1000) were higher in South Asian pregnancies (5.51) than British-European pregnancies (3.89) (P<.01) and increased in both groups with increasing body mass index (P<.01). Small-for-gestational-age rates were 2 to 3-fold higher for South Asian babies than British European babies according to the population-average standards (Hadlock: 26.2% vs 12.2%; Intergrowth-21st: 12.1% vs 4.9%; World Health Organization: 32.2% vs 16.0%) but were similar by the customized GROW standard (14.0% vs 13.6%). Despite the wide variation, each standard's small-for-gestation-age cases had increased stillbirth risk compared with non-small-for-gestation-age cases, with the magnitude of risk inversely proportional to the rate of cases defined as small for gestational age. All standards had similar stillbirth risk when the small-for-gestation-age rate was fixed at 10% by varying their respective thresholds for defining small for gestational age. When analyzed across body mass index subgroups, the small-for-gestation-age rate according to the GROW standard increased with increasing stillbirth rate, whereas small-for-gestation-age rates according to Hadlock, Intergrowth-21st, and World Health Organization fetal weight standards declined with increasing body mass index, showing a difference in trend (P<.01) to stillbirth rates across body mass index groups. In the normal body mass index subgroup, stillbirth rates showed little variation across maternal size groups; this trend was followed by GROW-based small-for-gestation-age rates, whereas small-for-gestation-age rates defined by each population-average standard declined with increasing maternal size.

CONCLUSION

Comparisons between population-average and customized fetal growth charts require examination of how well each standard identifies pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes within subgroups of any heterogeneous population. In both ethnic groups studied, increasing maternal body mass index was accompanied by increasing stillbirth risk, and this trend was reflected in more pregnancies being identified as small for gestational age only by the customized standard. In contrast, small-for-gestation-age rates fell according to each population-average standard, thereby hiding the increased stillbirth risk associated with high maternal body mass index.

Twin charts should be the standard reference to assess growth in twin pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Twin pregnancies are characterized by slower growth velocity compared with singletons, especially during the third trimester and, therefore, tend to be smaller than singletons. Growth surveillance is instrumental in the identification of twin pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes. Whether the phenomenon of slow growth is an adaptive physiological response or represents pathological growth lag, is controversial. In this review, we focus on the evidence related to the types of growth charts employed for twin pregnancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consistent evidence has emerged over the past few years from large independent cohorts in different countries suggesting that twin-specific standards perform better in identifying growth-restricted twin pregnancies at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, without resulting in an increase in interventions or iatrogenic prematurity.

SUMMARY

The current evidence supports the use of twin-specific reference charts. Concerted efforts should be made to derive prospective evidence from large multicentre studies on various aspects of the implementation of twin-specific standards.

Defining poor growth and stillbirth risk in pregnancy for infants of mothers with overweight and obesity

BACKGROUND

Mothers who are obese carry heavier fetuses and have lower rates of small for gestational age (<10th birthweight centile) infants. However, their infants may be growth-restricted (with an increased risk of stillbirth) at a higher birthweight centile compared with infants from healthy-weight women.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantify the birthweight centile at which the risk of stillbirth in infants born to obese women equaled that of <10th-centile infants born to healthy-weight women, and clarify the relationship between maternal body mass index, infant size, and stillbirth.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all infants born in Victoria, Australia, from 2009 to 2019 (754,946 cases for analysis). We applied uncustomized birthweight centiles to all infants, and stratified the maternal cohort by body mass index (<20 kg/m2, 20-25 kg/m2, 25-30 kg/m2, 30-35 kg/m2, 35-40 kg/m2, ≥40 kg/m2). For each body mass index category, we assessed proportions of infants born <10th centile and <3rd centile, stillbirth rates among infants of all sizes, and small for gestational age infants. We calculated the stillbirth rate (per 1000) and relative risk (risk of stillbirth if born <10th centile vs >10th centile) for healthy-weight women (body mass index, 20-25 kg/m2). We then determined the birthweight centile for infants born to mothers within other body mass index categories that equaled that rate or risk.

RESULTS

Stillbirth rates increased with increasing maternal body mass index. Infants classified as small for gestational age (<10th centile) from mothers with high body mass index had a higher risk of stillbirth (relative risk, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-4.47; for mothers with body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 vs healthy-weight mothers [body mass index, 20-25 kg/m2]). The stillbirth rate (stillborn infants per 1000 births) among <10th-centile infants born to healthy-weight mothers was 7.5 per 1000. The same stillbirth rate was observed at higher birthweight centiles for infants of women with higher body mass index (<18th centile for those with a body mass index of 25-30 kg/m2, <25th centile for body mass index of 30-35 kg/m2, <31st centile for body mass index of 35-40 kg/m2, <41st centile for body mass index of ≥40 kg/m2). The relative risk of stillbirth among small for gestational age infants of healthy-weight mothers was 5.46 (95% confidence interval, 4.65-6.40). The birthweight centile with a comparable relative risk of stillbirth increased with increasing body mass index (<16th centile for women with body mass index of 25-30 kg/m2, <19th centile for body mass index of 30-35 kg/m2, <28th centile for body mass index of 35-40 kg/m2, <30th centile for body mass index ≥40 kg/m2).

CONCLUSION

Obesity affects the relationship between infant size and perinatal mortality. The stillbirth risk observed in <10th-centile infants from healthy-weight mothers occurs at higher birthweight centiles with overweight or obese mothers. Clinicians should be aware that the same infant risk exists at a higher birthweight centile for women with higher body mass index.

[Review of the literature on intrauterine and birthweight charts]

OBJECTIVES

To describe the main intrauterine and birthweight charts and review the studies comparing their performance for the identification of infants at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search using Medline and selected the charts most frequently cited in the literature, French charts and those recently published.

RESULTS

Current knowledge on the association between mortality and morbidity and growth anomalies (small and large for gestational age) mostly relies on the use of descriptive charts which describe the weight distribution in unselected populations. Prescriptive charts, which describe ideal growth in low risk populations, have been constructed more recently. Few studies have evaluated whether the thresholds used to identify infants at risk with descriptive charts (such as the 3^rd or the 10^th percentile) are applicable to prescriptive charts. There is a large variability in the percentage of fetuses or newborns identified as being at risk by each chart, with from 3 to 25% having with a weight under the 10^th percentile, regardless of whether descriptive or prescriptive charts are used. The sensitivity and specificity of antenatal screening for small or large for gestational age newborns depends on the chart used to derive estimated fetal weight percentiles.

CONCLUSION

There is marked variability between intrauterine growth charts that can influence the percentage of infants identified as having abnormal growth. These results show that before the adoption of a growth chart, it is essential to evaluate whether it adequately describes the population and its performance for identifying of infants at risk because of growth anomalies.

Maternal socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and life dissatisfaction associated with a small for gestational age infant. The Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP)

PURPOSE

The aim is to investigate the associations of the mother's socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and life satisfaction with the delivery of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant.

METHODS

Data from 4598 participants of the population-based birth cohort study Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SniP) including comprehensive information on pregnancies, mothers, and their offspring in Western Pomerania, Germany were used in this study. The associations were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

After logistic regression analysis adjusted for height of the mother, women who delivered SGA infants, had lower education (p < 0.01) and smoked more frequently during pregnancy (p < 0.01) compared with mothers of adequate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. A mother with less than 10 years of education and one who continued smoking during pregnancy had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.23 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.44 to 3.46] and 2.68 (95% CI = 2.06-3.49) of having an SGA infant, respectively. There was no association between the employment of the mother (p = 0.28), the monthly income (p = 0.09), the family status (p = 0.80), the number of friendships outside the household that the mother would not wish to relinquish (p = 0.47), the number of people that she could rely on in case of an emergency (p = 0.75), or alcohol consumption prior to (p = 0.14) or during the pregnancy (p = 0.99) with SGA. Finally, women who delivered SGA infants were more frequently dissatisfied with their employment (p = 0.03) and financial status (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who delivered SGA infants had more associated socioeconomic and lifestyle risk factors and were more frequently dissatisfied with their life conditions than mothers of AGA neonates.

Adjusting growth standards for fetal sex improves correlation of small babies with stillbirth and adverse perinatal outcomes: A state-wide population study

OBJECTIVES

Sex impacts birthweight, with male babies heavier on average. Birthweight charts are thus sex specific, but ultrasound fetal weights are often reported by sex neutral standards. We aimed to identify what proportion of infants would be re-classified as SGA if sex-specific charts were used, and if this had a measurable impact on perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including all infants born in Victoria, Australia, from 2005-2015 (529,261 cases). We applied GROW centiles, either adjusted or not adjusted for fetal sex. We compared overall SGA populations, and the populations of males considered small by sex-specific charts only (SGAsex-only), and females considered small by sex-neutral charts only (SGAunadjust-only).

RESULTS

Of those <10th centile by sex-neutral charts, 39.6% were male and 60.5% female, but using sex-specific charts, 50.3% were male and 49.7% female. 19.2% of SGA females were reclassified as average for gestational age (AGA) using sex-specific charts. These female newborns were not at increased risk of stillbirth, combined perinatal mortality, NICU admissions, low Apgars or emergency CS compared with an AGA infant, but were at greater risk of being iatrogenically delivered on suspicion of growth restriction. 25.0% male infants were reclassified as SGA by sex-specific charts. These male newborns, compared to the AGAall infant, were at greater risk of stillbirth (RR 1.94, 95%CI 1.30-2.90), combined perinatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95%CI 1.26-2.57), NICU admissions (RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.12-1.71), Apgars <7 at 5 minutes (RR 1.40, 95%CI 1.25-1.56) and emergency CS (RR 1.12, 95%CI 1.06-1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of growth centiles not adjusted for fetal sex disproportionately classifies female infants as SGA, increasing their risk of unnecessary intervention, and fails to identify a cohort of male infants at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Sex-specific charts may help inform decisions and improve outcomes.

Comparison of Fenton, INTERGROWTH-21st, and Population-Based Growth Charts in Predicting Outcomes of Very Preterm Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates

Growth chart aids in management by identifying at-risk neonates with abnormal growth. In this retrospective analysis of 1067 neonates of 26-31 wk gestational age, the utility of 3 growth charts (local population-based, Fenton-2013, and INTERGROWTH-21^st) was studied in identifying very preterm neonates at risk of developing complications secondary to intrauterine growth retardation (hypoglycemia, mortality, and BPD at 36 wk). The proportion of neonates classified as small for gestational age was 9% (n = 96) with Fernandez chart, 16.7% (n = 178) with Fenton-2013 chart, and 24.8% (n = 265) with INTERGROWTH-21^st charts. The INTERGROWTH-21^st charts were more sensitive in identifying neonates developing complications, followed by Fenton-2013 and population-based charts. The population-based charts were more specific, accurate, and precise in differentiating neonates developing complications from those who did not, followed by Fenton-2013 and INTERGROWTH-21^st charts. For the outcomes studied, INTERGROWTH-21^st charts had reasonable tradeoff between sensitivity and (34%-50%) and specificity (76%-77%).

Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

The use of birthweight standards to define small for gestational age may fail to identify neonates affected by poor fetal growth as they include births associated with suboptimal fetal growth.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standards to define newborn small for gestational age to predict neonatal morbidity and mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study of 118,422 births. Live-born singleton, nonanomalous newborns born at 23 to 41 weeks of gestation were included. Those with missing gestational age estimation or without a first- or second-trimester ultrasound to confirm dating, birthweight, or neonatal outcome data were excluded. Birthweight percentile was computed using an intrauterine standard (Hadlock) and a birthweight-derived standard (Olsen). We compared the test characteristics of small for gestational age (birthweight of <10th percentile) by each standard to predict a composite neonatal morbidity and mortality outcome (death before discharge, neonatal intensive care unit admission >48 hours, respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, or seizures). Severe composite morbidity was analyzed as a secondary outcome and was defined as death, neonatal intensive care unit admission >7 days, necrotizing enterocolitis, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, or seizures. The areas under the curve using receiver-operating characteristic methodology and proportions of the primary outcome by small for gestational age status were compared by gestational age category at birth (<34, 34 0/7 to 36 6/7, ≥37 weeks).

RESULTS

Of 115,502 mother-newborn dyads in the parent study, 78,203 (67.7%) were included, with most exclusions occurring because of missing or inadequate dating information, multiple gestations, or delivery outside the gestational age range. The primary composite outcome occurred in 9.5% (95% confidence interval, 9.3-9.7), and the severe composite outcome occurred in 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.1-5.4). Small for gestational age was diagnosed by intrauterine and birthweight-derived standards in 14.8% and 7.4%, respectively (P<.001). Neonates considered small for gestational age only by the intrauterine standard experienced the primary outcome more than twice as often as those considered non-small for gestational age by both standards (18.4% vs 7.9%; P<.001). For the prediction of the primary outcome, small for gestational age by the intrauterine standard had higher sensitivity (29% vs 15%; P<.001) but lower specificity (87% vs 93%; P<.001) than by the birthweight standard. Both standards had weak performance overall, although the intrauterine standard had a higher area under the curve (0.58 vs 0.53; P<.001). When subanalyzed by gestational age at birth, the difference in areas under the curve was only present among preterm deliveries 34 to 36 competed weeks. Neither standard demonstrated any discrimination for morbidity prediction among term births (area under the curve, 0.50 for both). When the prediction of severe morbidity was compared, the intrauterine still had better overall prediction than the birthweight standard (areas under the curve, 0.65 vs 0.57; P<.001), although this also varied by gestational age at birth.

CONCLUSION

Among nonanomalous neonates, neither intrauterine nor birthweight-derived standards for small for gestational age accurately predicted neonatal morbidity and mortality, with no discriminatory ability at term. Small for gestational age intrauterine standards performed better than birthweight standards.

Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21st birthweight standards to identify small for gestational age associated perinatal outcomes at term

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth restriction is associated with stillbirth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, and use of the correct weight standard is an essential proxy indicator of growth status and perinatal risk.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the performance of two international birthweight standards for their ability to identify perinatal morbidity and mortality indicators associated with small for gestational age (SGA) infants at term.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study used data from a multi-center perinatal quality initiative including a multi-ethnic dataset of 125,826 births from 2012-2017. Of the singleton term births, 92,622 had complete outcome data including stillbirth, neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar <7, neonatal glucose instability and need for newborn transfer to a higher level of care or NICU admission. The customized (GROW) and INTERGROWTH-21^st (IG21) birthweight standards were applied to determine SGA (<10^th centile) according to their respective methods and formulae. Associations with adverse outcomes were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and population attributable fraction (PAF).

RESULTS

GROW classified 9,578 (10.3%) and IG21 classified 4,079 (4.4%) pregnancies as SGA, respectively. For all of the outcomes assessed, GROW identified more SGA infants with adverse outcomes than IG21, including more stillbirths, perinatal deaths, low Apgar scores, glucose instability, newborn seizure and transfers to a higher level of care. Thirteen of the 27 stillbirths (48%) that were SGA by either method were identified as SGA by GROW but not by IG21. Similarly, additional cases of all other adverse outcome indicators were identified by GROW as SGA, while only in one category (glucose instability) did IG21 identify 9 of 295 cases (3.1%) which were not identified as SGA by GROW.

CONCLUSION

Customized assessment using GROW results in increased identification of small for gestational age term babies that are at significantly increased risk of an array of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate three birth-weight (BW) standards (Australian population-based, Fenton and INTERGROWTH-21^st ) and three estimated-fetal-weight (EFW) standards (Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21^st and WHO) for classifying small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) and predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in preterm and term babies.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based study conducted on a total of 2.4 million singleton births that occurred from 24 + 0 to 40 + 6 weeks' gestation between 2004 and 2013 in Australia. The performance of the growth charts was evaluated according to SGA and LGA classification, and relative risk (RR) and diagnostic accuracy based on the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUCs) for stillbirth, neonatal death, perinatal death, composite morbidity and a composite of perinatal death and morbidity outcomes. The analysis was stratified according to gestational age at delivery (< 37 + 0 vs ≥ 37 + 0 weeks).

RESULTS

Following exclusions, 2 392 782 singleton births were analyzed. There were significant differences in the SGA and LGA classification and risk of adverse outcomes between the six BW and EFW standards evaluated. For the term group, compared with the other standards, the INTERGROWTH-21^st BW and EFW standards classified half the number of SGA (< 10^th centile) babies (3-4% vs 7-11%) and twice the number of LGA (> 90^th centile) babies (24-25% vs 8-15%), resulting in a smaller cohort of term SGA at higher risk of adverse outcome and a larger LGA cohort at lower risk of adverse outcome. For term SGA (< 3^rd centile) babies, the RR of perinatal death using the two INTERGROWTH-21^st standards was up to 1.5-fold higher than those of the other standards (including the WHO-EFW and Hadlock-EFW), while the INTERGROWTH-21^st -EFW standard indicated a 12-26% reduced risk of perinatal death for LGA cases across centile thresholds. Conversely, for the preterm group, the WHO-EFW and Hadlock-EFW standards identified a higher SGA classification rate than did the other standards (18-19% vs 10-11%) and a 20-65% increased risk of perinatal death in term LGA babies. All BW and EFW charts had similarly poor performance in predicting adverse outcomes, including the composite outcome (AUC range, 0.49-0.62) for both preterm (AUC range, 0.58-0.62) and term (AUC range, 0.49-0.50) cases and across centiles. Furthermore, specific centile thresholds for identifying adverse outcomes varied markedly by chart between BW and EFW standards.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addresses the recurrent problem of identifying fetuses at risk of morbidity and perinatal mortality associated with growth disorders and provides new insights into the applicability of international growth standards. Our findings of marked variation in classification and the similarly poor performance of prescriptive international standards and the other commonly used standards raise questions about whether the prescriptive international standards that were constructed for universal adoption are indeed applicable to a multiethnic population such as that of Australia. Thus, caution is needed when adopting universal standards for clinical and epidemiological use. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Assessment of apoptosis and appearance of hepatocyte growth factor in placenta at different gestational ages: A cross-sectional study

Background

Fetal growth is determined by the interaction between mother and fetus using the placental interface throughout the pregnancy.

Objective

To research apoptosis and appearance of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in placentas of different gestational ages and to describe the anthropometrical and clinical indices of mothers and newborns.

Materials and Methods

The study material was obtained from 53 human immunodeficiency virus negative pregnant women of legal age without systemic diseases. The staining of placental apoptotic cells was processed by a standard in situ cell death detection kit. The detection of HGF was provided by the ImmunoCruz goat ABC Staining System protocol sc-2023. Relative distribution of positive structures was evaluated using the semiquantitative counting method.

Results

The mean rank value of the amount of HGF-containing cells (cytotrophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblasts, extravillous trophoblasts, Höfbauer cells, and cells of extraembryonic mesoderm) was 1.61 ± 0.94. Apoptotic cells (cytotrophoblasts, syncytiotrophoblasts, extravillous trophoblasts, and cells of extraembryonic mesoderm) were found in all placental samples of various gestational ages (term 13.00 ± 13.05 and preterm 27.00 ± 18.25); in general, their amount decreased with advancing gestational age of the placenta (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Weight of a placenta directly depends on the gestational age and correlates with the main fetal anthropometrical parameters (weight, length, and head and chest circumferences). The decrease in HGF-containing and apoptotic cells with advancing gestation depends on the adaptation potential of the placenta, proving the other ways of cellular disposition.

FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as the failure of the fetus to meet its growth potential due to a pathological factor, most commonly placental dysfunction. Worldwide, FGR is a leading cause of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and short- and long-term morbidity. Ongoing advances in clinical care, especially in definitions, diagnosis, and management of FGR, require efforts to effectively translate these changes to the wide range of obstetric care providers. This article highlights agreements based on current research in the diagnosis and management of FGR, and the areas that need more research to provide further clarification of recommendations. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence along with practical recommendations concerning the care of pregnancies at risk of or complicated by FGR, with the overall goal to decrease the risk of stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with this condition. To achieve these goals, FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) brought together international experts to review and summarize current knowledge of FGR. This summary is directed at multiple stakeholders, including healthcare providers, healthcare delivery organizations and providers, FIGO member societies, and professional organizations. Recognizing the variation in the resources and expertise available for the management of FGR in different countries or regions, this article attempts to take into consideration the unique aspects of antenatal care in low-resource settings (labelled “LRS” in the recommendations). This was achieved by collaboration with authors and FIGO member societies from low-resource settings such as India, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.

DAAM2 is elevated in the circulation and placenta in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction and is regulated by hypoxia

Previously, we identified increased maternal circulating DAAM2 mRNA in pregnancies complicated by preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR). Here, we assessed whether circulating DAAM2 mRNA could detect FGR, and whether the DAAM2 gene, known to play roles in the Wnt signalling pathway is expressed in human placenta and associated with dysfunction and FGR. We performed linear regression analysis to calculate area under the ROC curve (AUC) for DAAM2 mRNA expression in the maternal circulation of pregnancies complicated by preterm FGR. DAAM2 mRNA expression was assessed across gestation by qPCR. DAAM2 protein and mRNA expression was assessed in preterm FGR placenta using western blot and qPCR. DAAM2 expression was assessed in term cytotrophoblasts and placental explant tissue cultured under hypoxic and normoxic conditions by qPCR. Small interfering RNAs were used to silence DAAM2 in term primary cytotrophoblasts. Expression of growth, apoptosis and oxidative stress genes were assessed by qPCR. Circulating DAAM2 mRNA was elevated in pregnancies complicated by preterm FGR [p < 0.0001, AUC = 0.83 (0.78–0.89)]. Placental DAAM2 mRNA was detectable across gestation, with highest expression at term. DAAM2 protein was increased in preterm FGR placentas but demonstrated no change in mRNA expression. DAAM2 mRNA expression was increased in cytotrophoblasts and placental explants under hypoxia. Silencing DAAM2 under hypoxia decreased expression of pro-survival gene, BCL2 and oxidative stress marker, NOX4, whilst increasing expression of antioxidant enzyme, HMOX-1. The increased DAAM2 associated with FGR and hypoxia implicates a potential role in placental dysfunction. Decreasing DAAM2 may have cytoprotective effects, but further research is required to elucidate its role in healthy and dysfunctional placentas.

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal growth charts for placenta-related fetal growth restriction

INTRODUCTION

The choice of fetal growth chart to be used in antenatal screening for fetal growth restriction (FGR) has an important impact on the proportion of fetuses diagnosed as small for gestational age (SGA), and on the detection rate for FGR. We aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy of SGA diagnosed using four different common fetal growth charts [Hadlock, Intergrowth-21st (IG21), World Health Organization (WHO), and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)], for abnormal placental pathology.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study in low-risk nulliparous women. The exposure was SGA (birthweight <10th centile for gestational age) using each of the four charts. The outcomes were one of three types of abnormal placental pathology associated with fetal growth restriction: maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), chronic villitis, and fetal vascular malperfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 742 nulliparous women met the study criteria. The proportion of SGA was closest to the expected rate of 10% using the Hadlock chart (12.7%). The detection rates (DR) and false positive rates (FPR) for MVM pathology were similar for the Hadlock (DR = 53.1%, FPR = 10.8%), WHO (DR = 59.4%, FPR = 14.2%), and NICHD (DR = 53.1%, FPR = 12.3%) charts, and each was superior when compared to the IG21 chart (DR = 34.4%, FPR = 3.8%, p < 0.001). The diagnosis of SGA was associated with increased risks of preeclampsia and preterm birth for all four charts.

DISCUSSION

The selection of fetal growth chart to be used in screening programs for FGR has important implications with regard to the false positive and detection rate for FGR.

Extrauterine Growth Restriction in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Concordance Between Fenton 2013 and INTERGROWTH-21st Growth Charts

Postnatal growth restriction has high prevalence in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm neonates, and this could affect their long-term prognosis. Nowadays, there is no consensus on how to monitor growth in these neonates. Objective: This study aimed to compare prevalence of intra- and extrauterine growth restriction (IUGR and EUGR) in a sample of VLBW infants according to the Fenton 2013 charts and INTERGROWTH-21st (IW-21) standards and to analyze concordance between both in the different EUGR definitions criteria (cross-sectional, dynamic, and true). Patients and Methods: An observational retrospective study of 635 VLBW preterm was performed. The study was carried out in Central University Hospital of Asturias. Body measurements (weight, length, and head circumference) were collected at birth and at hospital discharge and expressed in z-scores for the two references (Fenton 2010 and IW-21). Kappa concordance was calculated. Results: Kappa concordance between Fenton and IW-21 was 0.887 for IUGR and 0.580 for static EUGR. Prevalence was higher according to Fenton in IUGR (36.5 vs. 35.1%), in static EUGR (73.8 vs. 59.3%), and in dynamic EUGR (44.3 vs. 29.3%). Despite observing low prevalence of EUGR when IW-21 was used to define EUGR, a statistical association between neonatal morbidity and diagnosis of EUGR was observed. Conclusion: The Fenton and IW-21 concordance for IUGR is good. IW-21 is more restrictive than Fenton in EUGR. Patients diagnosed by IW-21 as EUGR are more likely to have neonatal morbidity, especially if we use EUGR dynamic definition. In our study, we cannot conclude that one graph is better than the other.

Do patients with a short cervix, with or without an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, have an increased risk for a small for gestational age newborn?

INTRODUCTION

Mothers with a short cervix have been shown to have increased risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD) and newborn morbidity. Those who require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage experience the highest rates of morbidity. Inflammation has been linked to a short cervix, and it has been linked to pregnancies affected by small for gestational age (SGA) newborns. To date, there are no studies that have investigated an association between a short cervix, with or without an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, and a SGA newborn.

METHODS

This was a case-control study examining all pregnancies with a transvaginal cervical length <25 mm found at their second trimester anatomy scan. Cases were subdivided into those who received an ultrasound-indicated cerclage (Group 1, n = 52) and those who did not (Group 2, n = 139). Controls were defined as pregnancies with a transvaginal cervical length >25 mm with no cerclage (Group 3, n = 186) whose due date was within 2 months of the case pregnancy. Each short cervix case was matched with a control from group 3 in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was birthweight <10% (SGA). Unadjusted data was analyzed with simple odds ratios. A logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables and provide an adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

RESULTS

The incidence of SGA among cases overall (group 1 + group 2) was 13.6% (26/191). In group 3, the SGA incidence was 4.3% (8/186). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for a SGA infant was significant, 2.8 (95% CI 1.2, 6.6). Subgroup analysis showed that Group 1 had an increased risk for an SGA infant [aOR 4.9 (95% CI 1.8, 13.7)], but Group 2 did not show a significant finding [aOR 2.3 (95% CI 0.9, 5.7)].

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies complicated by a short cervical length <25mm, with or without a cerclage, were associated with an increased risk for a SGA newborn. Most of this significance was due to the pregnancies which received an ultrasound-indicated cerclage for a mid-trimester short cervix.

Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the choice growth chart and threshold used to define small for gestational age (SGA) on the predictive value of SGA for placenta-related or unexplained antepartum stillbirth.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton pregnancy who gave birth > 24 week gestation in a single center (2000-2016). The exposure of interest was SGA, defined as birth weight < 10th or < 25th centile according to three fetal growth charts (Hadlock et al., Radiology 181:129-133, 1991; intergrowth-21st (IG21), WHO 2017, and a Canadian birthweight-based reference-Kramer et al., Pediatrics 108:E35, 2001). The outcome of interest was antepartum stillbirth due to placental dysfunction or unknown etiology. Cases of stillbirth attributed to other specific etiologies were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 49,458 women were included in the cohort. There were 103 (0.21%) cases of stillbirth due to placental dysfunction or unknown etiology. For cases in the early stillbirth cluster (≤ 30 weeks), the detection rate was high and was similar for the three ultrasound-based fetal growth charts of Hadlock, IG21, and WHO (range 83.3-87.0%). In contrast, the detection rate of SGA for cases in the late stillbirth cluster (> 30 weeks) was low, being highest for WHO and Hadlock (36.7% and 34.7%, respectively), and lowest for IG21 (18.4%). Using a threshold of the 25th centile increased the detection rate for stillbirth by approximately 15-20% compared with that achieved by the 10th centile cutoff.

CONCLUSION

At > 30 week gestation, the Hadlock or WHO fetal growth charts provided the best balance between detection rate and false positive rate for stillbirth.

Earlier Nutrient Fortification of Breastmilk Fed LBW Infants Improves Jaundice Related Outcomes

This study aimed to evaluate jaundice outcomes of low-birthweight premature infants commenced on earlier versus later nutrient supplementation (80 mL/kg/day vs. 160 mL/kg/day; total fluid intake, F80 vs. F160). Demographics, feeding regimens, and clinical outcomes data were collected. Infant and maternal characteristics were similar. Earlier nutrient supplementation was associated with multiple improved jaundice outcomes: total (TSBR), unconjugated and conjugated (CSBR) serum bilirubin values (196 ± 46 vs. 228 ± 52, 184 ± 44 vs. 212 ± 50, 12 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 5, respectively, all p < 0.001); phototherapy (39% vs. 64%, p < 0.0001). % CSBR/TSBR ratio was similar between groups. For those on phototherapy, duration and median irradiance were similar. F80 infants experienced reduced: feeding intolerance (26.0% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.007); length of stay (16.0 ± 0.64 vs. 18.8 ± 0.74 days, p = 0.03), maximum weight loss as % birth weight (5% vs. 6%, p = 0.03); decrease in weight Z-score at 10 days (-0.70 ± 0.03 vs. -0.79 ± 0.03, p = 0.01). F80 infants regained birthweight earlier (10.0 ± 0.3 days vs. 11.5 ± 0.3 days, p < 0.0001) and had no differences in adverse clinical outcomes. We speculate that earlier nutrient supplementation improved jaundice outcomes due to enhanced excretion/elimination of bilirubin.

The pitfalls of using birthweight centile charts to audit care

Objectives

Timely delivery of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is important in reducing stillbirth. However, targeted earlier delivery of FGR preferentially removes smaller babies from later gestations, thereby right-shifting the distribution of birthweights at term. This artificially increases the birthweight cutoffs defining the lower centiles and redefines normally grown babies as small by population-based birthweight centiles. Our objective was to compare updated Australian national population-based birthweight centile charts over time with the prescriptive INTERGROWTH-21^st standard.

Methods

A retrospective descriptive study of all singleton births ≥34 weeks’ gestation in Victoria, Australia in five two-year epochs: 1983–84, 1993–94, 2003–04, 2013–14, and 2016–17. The birthweight cutoffs defining the 3^rd and 10^th centile from three Australian national population-based birthweight centile charts, for births in 1991–1994, in 1998–2007, and 2004–2013 respectively, were applied to each epoch to calculate the proportion of babies with birthweight <3^rd and <10^th centile. The same analysis was done using the INTERGROWTH-21^st birthweight standard. To assess change over gestation, proportions were also calculated at preterm, early term and late term gestations.

Results

From 1983–84 to 2016–17, the proportion of babies with birthweight <3^rd fell across all birthweight centile charts, from 3.1% to 1.7% using the oldest Australian chart, from 3.9% to 1.9% using the second oldest Australian chart, from 4.3% to 2.2% using the most recent Australian chart, and from 2.0% to 0.9% using the INTERGROWTH-21^st standard. A similar effect was evident for the <10^th centile. The effect was most obvious at term gestations. Updating the Australian population birthweight chart progressively right-shifted the birthweight distribution, changing the definition of small over time. The birthweight distribution of INTERGROWTH-21^st was left-shifted compared to the Australian charts.

Conclusions

Locally-derived population-based birthweight centiles are better for clinical audit of care but should not be updated. Prescriptive birthweight standards are less useful in defining ‘small’ due to their significant left-shift.

Circulating mRNAs are differentially expressed in pregnancies with severe placental insufficiency and at high risk of stillbirth

BACKGROUND

Fetuses affected by placental insufficiency do not receive adequate nutrients and oxygenation, become growth restricted and acidemic, and can demise. Preterm fetal growth restriction is a severe form of placental insufficiency with a high risk of stillbirth. We set out to identify maternal circulating mRNA transcripts that are differentially expressed in preterm pregnancies complicated by very severe placental insufficiency, in utero fetal acidemia, and are at very high risk of stillbirth.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study across six hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, prospectively collecting blood from 128 pregnancies complicated by preterm fetal growth restriction (delivery < 34 weeks' gestation) and 42 controls. RNA-sequencing was done on all samples to discover circulating mRNAs associated with preterm fetal growth restriction and fetal acidemia in utero. We used RT-PCR to validate the associations between five lead candidate biomarkers of placental insufficiency in an independent cohort from Europe (46 with preterm fetal growth restriction) and in a third cohort of pregnancies ending in stillbirth.

RESULTS

In the Australia and New Zealand cohort, we identified five mRNAs that were highly differentially expressed among pregnancies with preterm fetal growth restriction: NR4A2, EMP1, PGM5, SKIL, and UGT2B1. Combining three yielded an area under the receiver operative curve (AUC) of 0.95. Circulating NR4A2 and RCBTB2 in the maternal blood were dysregulated in the presence of fetal acidemia in utero. We validated the association between preterm fetal growth restriction and circulating EMP1, NR4A2, and PGM5 mRNA in a cohort from Europe. Combining EMP1 and PGM5 identified fetal growth restriction with an AUC of 0.92. Several of these genes were differentially expressed in the presence of ultrasound parameters that reflect placental insufficiency. Circulating NR4A2, EMP1, and RCBTB2 mRNA were differentially regulated in another cohort destined for stillbirth, compared to ongoing pregnancies. EMP1 mRNA appeared to have the most consistent association with placental insufficiency in all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring circulating mRNA offers potential as a test to identify pregnancies with severe placental insufficiency and at very high risk of stillbirth. Circulating mRNA EMP1 may be promising as a biomarker of severe placental insufficiency.