Impact of definitive therapy with beta-lactam monotherapy or combination with an aminoglycoside or a quinolone for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia

Gram-negative bacteria act as a reservoir for aminoglycoside antibiotics that interact with host factors to enhance bacterial killing in a mouse model of pneumonia

In vitro exposure of multiple Gram-negative bacteria to an aminoglycoside (AG) antibiotic has previously been demonstrated to result in bacterial alterations that interact with host factors to suppress Gram-negative pneumonia. However, the mechanisms resulting in suppression are not known. Here, the hypothesis that Gram-negative bacteria bind and retain AGs, which are introduced into the lung and interact with host defenses to affect bacterial killing, was tested. Following in vitro exposure of one of several, pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria to the AG antibiotics kanamycin or gentamicin, AGs were detected in bacterial cell pellets (up to 208 μg/mL). Using inhibitors of AG binding and internalization, the bacterial outer membrane was implicated as the predominant kanamycin and gentamicin reservoir. Following intranasal administration of gentamicin-bound bacteria or gentamicin solution at the time of infection with live, AG-naïve bacteria, gentamicin was detected in the lungs of infected mice (up to 8 μg/g). Co-inoculation with gentamicin-bound bacteria resulted in killing of AG-naïve bacteria by up to 3-log₁₀, mirroring the effects of intranasal gentamicin treatment. In vitro killing of AG-naïve bacteria mediated by kanamycin-bound bacteria required the presence of detergents or pulmonary surfactant, suggesting that increased bacterial killing inside the murine lung is facilitated by the detergent component of pulmonary surfactant. These findings demonstrate that Gram-negative bacteria bind and retain AGs that can interact with host-derived pulmonary surfactant to enhance bacterial killing in the lung. This may help explain why AGs appear to have unique efficacy in the lung and might expand their clinical utility.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia: Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance and Implications for Therapy

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), a non-lactose-fermenting gram-negative bacillus, is a common cause of nosocomial infections in critically ill or debilitated patients, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and infections of urinary tract, intra-abdominal, wounds, skin/soft tissue, and bloodstream. PA rarely affects healthy individuals, but may cause serious infections in patients with chronic structural lung disease, comorbidities, advanced age, impaired immune defenses, or with medical devices (e.g., urinary or intravascular catheters, foreign bodies). Treatment of pseudomonal infections is difficult, as PA is intrinsically resistant to multiple antimicrobials, and may acquire new resistance determinants even while on antimicrobial therapy. Mortality associated with pseudomonal VAP or bacteremias is high (> 35%) and optimal therapy is controversial. Over the past three decades, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among PA has escalated globally, via dissemination of several international multidrug resistant "epidemic" clones. We discuss the importance of PA as a cause of pneumonia including health care-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, VAP, the emergence of AMR to this pathogen, and approaches to therapy (both empirical and definitive).

Beta-lactam monotherapy or combination therapy for bloodstream infections or pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of patients treated with beta-lactam monotherapy or combination therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND INTERVENTIONS: . Experimental and observational studies published as full papers up to December 2020 that compared the efficacy of beta-lactams used in monotherapy or in combination with other active agents as empirical or targeted therapy for bloodstream infections or Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (HAP/VAP) due to P. aeruginosa. The outcomes evaluated were hospital-mortality, 14-day- or 30-day-mortality rate, microbiological eradication rate and clinical cure rate.

RESULTS

. Of a total of 8,363 citations screened, 6 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), 6 prospective cohort studies, and 21 retrospective cohort studies were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 3,861 subjects. Considering the 14 studies evaluating the empirical therapy, no significant difference in mortality rate was observed between the two groups (RR: 1.06; 95% CI 0.86-1.30, p=0.6). Similar findings were obtained among the 18 studies analysing the targeted therapy (RR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.83-1.31, p=0.708); however, grouping the studies according to the design, a higher mortality among patients receiving monotherapy was observed in 5 prospective studies (RR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.79, p=0.018). Finally, no difference was observed among groups considering the microbiological and the clinical cure.

CONCLUSIONS

. Our meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the mortality rate, clinical cure and microbiological cure in patients treated with beta-lactam monotherapy or combination for P. aeruginosa infections.

Combination antibiotic therapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an open-label randomized trial

Background

The role of antibiotics in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and their effectiveness in combination have not been clearly established. To determine whether using a combination of fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams improves the clinical and microbiological efficacy of antibiotics on day 20 of treatment, we conducted an open-label randomized trial based on clinical outcomes, microbiological clearance, spirometry tests, and signs of systemic inflammation in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of COPD.

Methods

We enrolled 139 subjects with COPD exacerbations, defined as acute worsening of respiratory symptoms leading to additional treatment. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: 79 patients using beta-lactam antibiotics alone and 60 using beta-lactam antibiotics plus fluoroquinolones. Clinical and microbiological responses, spirometry tests, symptom scores, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were evaluated.

Results

Clinical success, lung function, and symptoms were similar in patients with or without fluoroquinolone administration on days 10 and 20. Combination therapy was superior in terms of microbiological outcomes and reduction in serum CRP value. Although equivalent to monotherapy in terms of clinical success, the combination showed superiority in terms of microbiological success and a decrease in CRP. The combination therapy group had a higher microbiological success rate with gram-negative bacteria than the monotherapy group with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (100% vs. 33.3%, respectively) and Acinetobacter baumanii (100% vs. 20%, respectively) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Concomitant use of fluoroquinolone and beta-lactam antibiotics for bacterial infections during COPD exacerbations caused by gram-negative bacteria appear to be effective and should be applied in clinical practice.

The effects of adding quinolones to beta-lactam antibiotics for sepsis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is common, deadly, and a major challenge to treat. Quinolones added to beta-lactam antibiotics are currently recommended as a second-line empiric regimen in sepsis, but the evidence regarding their benefits and harms is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefits and harms of adding quinolones to standard care for sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, SCI-Expanded, and BIOSIS.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of adding any quinolone to standard care for children and adults with sepsis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by GRADE.

RESULTS

We included three trials randomizing 995 adults. All trials were at overall "high risk of bias." All trials compared a quinolone (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin) and a beta-lactam antibiotic versus the same beta-lactam antibiotic. We found no evidence of an effect of adding quinolones to beta-lactam antibiotics when assessing all-cause mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.33; 2 trials; 915 participants; very low certainty of evidence) and serious adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.50; 977 participants; two trials; very low certainty of evidence). No trials reported on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of adding quinolones to beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of sepsis were unclear for all outcomes. Additional trial data are warranted to support the recommendation of empirical use of quinolones for sepsis.

β-lactam antibiotic versus combined β-lactam antibiotics and single daily dosing regimens of aminoglycosides for treating serious infections: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combining aminoglycosides with β-lactam antibiotics for treating serious infections has not been associated with reduced mortality in previous meta-analyses. However, the multiple daily aminoglycoside dosing regimen principally used in most of the included studies is inconsistent with current practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a combination of an aminoglycoside administered as a single daily dose and a β-lactam antibiotic reduces all-cause mortality in patients compared with β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies was performed (Prospero registration number #68506). Studies were included if they compared β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy with combined β-lactam and single daily dose aminoglycoside therapy for treating serious infections. Studies investigating multiple daily dosing aminoglycoside regimens, infective endocarditis and febrile neutropaenia were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro and Newcastle-Ottawa scoring systems. The end points for outcome analyses were 30-day all-cause mortality, clinical cure and nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials and five retrospective cohort studies were analysed. Compared with β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy, single daily aminoglycoside dosing in combination with β-lactam antibiotics was not associated with reduced mortality compared with β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy (n = 3686, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.08, P = 0.10, I² 42%). A subgroup analysis of cohort studies suggested reduced mortality with combination therapy (n = 3563, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99, P = 0.04, I² 32%). No increased risk of nephrotoxicity was identified (n = 1110, OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.83-2.09, P = 0.40, I² 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence suggests no added survival benefit from a single daily dosing regimen of an aminoglycoside when combined with β-lactam antibiotics.

A retrospective analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in carbapenem-susceptible and -non-susceptible infections

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a leading cause of nosocomial infections, and carbapenem non-susceptible strains are a major threat to patient safety.

Methods

A single center, retrospective comparative analysis of carbapenem-non-susceptible PA (CnSPA) and carbapenem-susceptible PA (CSPA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) was conducted between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Prevalence and risk factors associated with CnSPA BSIs were examined.

Results

The study enrolled 340 patients with PA BSIs; 30.0% (N = 101) of patients had CnSPA. High APACHE II scores (≥15), central venous catheterization, and delayed application of appropriate definitive therapy were independently associated with higher risk of mortality in PA BSIs. Multivariate analysis revealed that respiratory disease and exposure to carbapenems within the previous 90 days to onset of BSI were independent risk factors for acquisition of CnSPA BSIs. Overall all-cause 30-day mortality associated with PA BSIs was 26.8% (91/340). In addition, mortality was higher in patients with CnSPA than in those with CSPA (37.6% vs. 22.2%, respectively; P = 0.003). Corticosteroid therapy and delayed receipt of effective definitive therapy were independent risk factors for death from CnSPA BSIs.

Conclusion

Increased incidence of CnSPA BSIs was observed during the study period, with higher mortality seen in patients with these infections. Respiratory disease and exposure to carbapenems were independent risk factors for development of CnSPA BSIs. Appropriate definitive therapy reduced mortality rates. BLBLIs were as effective as carbapenems as a treatment for PA BSIs.

Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in a tertiary hospital: Mortality and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia is associated with a very high mortality, conditioned by comorbidity, source, severity of the episode and lack of adequate treatment. The aim of the study is to know the mortality and prognostic factors of bacteraemia by P.aeruginosa in our hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of P.aeruginosa bacteraemia detected between 2009 and 2014. Epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics were described. A risk factor analysis for mortality was performed.

RESULTS

We analysed 110 episodes of bacteraemia, which was more frequent in men of advanced age and with a history of hospitalisation, comorbidity and immunosuppression. Most of the bacteraemias were secondary (mainly of respiratory or urinary source) and led to a significant clinical deterioration. The presence of antibiotic resistance was very high, with 27.3% of multiresistant strains. Empirical treatment was adequate in 60.0% and 92.3% for definite treatment. Overall mortality was 37.3% and attributable mortality was 29.1%. The most important prognostic factors were Charlson index ≥3, history of haematologic malignancy, neutropenia and previous use of corticosteroids, source of bacteraemia, Pitt index ≥4, renal insufficiency, adequate definite treatment, empiric treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam in severe episodes and focus control.

CONCLUSION

P.aeruginosa bacteraemia is associated with a very high mortality, possibly more related to previous comorbidity and severity of the episode than to the treatment chosen. However, the main goal in management remains to optimise treatment, including focus control.

Is fluoroquinolone monotherapy a useful alternative treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia?

PURPOSE

Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia is associated with high mortality, and most monotherapies are beta-lactam-based. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes of definitive fluoroquinolone monotherapy versus beta-lactam monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled adult patients receiving definitive monotherapy with beta-lactam or fluoroquinolone between November 2013 and November 2014 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The independent risk factors for 28-day mortality were analyzed by logistic regression and propensity score-adjusted analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 105 patients enrolled, 78 patients received beta-lactams and 27 received fluoroquinolones (20 with ciprofloxacin and 7 with levofloxacin). Primary bacteraemia (39.0%) and urinary tract infections (37.1%) were the most common sources of bacteraemia. The 28-day mortality rate was 11.1% for those receiving fluoroquinolones and 32.1% for those receiving beta-lactams (P = 0.062). The 28-day mortality rate between the two groups stratified by APACHE II and Pitt bacteraemia scores showed no significant differences in each category. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that definitive therapy with a fluoroquinolone was not associated with 28-day mortality (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.08-2.23; P = 0.305).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolone might be an alternative to beta-lactam as a definitive monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia provided they are active in vitro. Our results could be a basis for further studies and provide a possible target for antibiotic stewardship interventions in P. aeruginosa bacteraemia.

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by a notable intrinsic resistance to antibiotics, mainly mediated by the expression of inducible chromosomic β-lactamases and the production of constitutive or inducible efflux pumps. Apart from this intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa possess an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to nearly all available antimicrobials through selection of mutations. The progressive increase in resistance rates in P. aeruginosa has led to the emergence of strains which, based on their degree of resistance to common antibiotics, have been defined as multidrug resistant, extended-resistant and panresistant strains. These strains are increasingly disseminated worldwide, progressively complicating the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. In this scenario, the objective of the present guidelines was to review and update published evidence for the treatment of patients with acute, invasive and severe infections caused by P. aeruginosa. To this end, mechanisms of intrinsic resistance, factors favoring development of resistance during antibiotic exposure, prevalence of resistance in Spain, classical and recently appeared new antibiotics active against P. aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic principles predicting efficacy, clinical experience with monotherapy and combination therapy, and principles for antibiotic treatment were reviewed to elaborate recommendations by the panel of experts for empirical and directed treatment of P. aeruginosa invasive infections.

Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies

It is currently unknown whether antibiotic monotherapy or combination therapy is a more effective treatment for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia. The present study consists of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in associated studies. The treatment options of monotherapy and combination therapy have been compared, to determine which is more effective against P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Several electronic bibliographic databases were systematically searched and clinical studies that compared combination therapy with monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia were identified. Dersimonian and Laird's random-effects models were used to generate summary estimates of the effects and to assess their association according to different patient characteristics and research quality standards. A total of 17 studies were selected, 3 of which were prospective while the remaining 14 were retrospective. The studies involved a total of 2,504 patients. Significant differences between combination therapy and monotherapy treatment were not found when the data were combined (odds ratio (OR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.61–1.08; P=0.035). The results demonstrated strength in a number of stratification and sensitivity analyses. The variables used included study type, treatment quality score and survival rate of subgroup analysis. To conduct cumulative meta-analysis, the number of years and samples were calculated. The OR value and 95% CI were stable and demonstrated good change trend. According to the size of the sample order following accumulation, OR values and 95% CI (0.89, 0.76–1.04) exhibited a narrow range. Neither combination therapy or monotherapy exhibited significant effects on the mortality of patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Future research is required and should include large, well-designed prospective cohorts, and grouped clinical studies.

Preventive and therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients with highly resistant bacteria

The antibiotic pipeline continues to diminish and the majority of the public remains unaware of this critical situation. The cause of the decline of antibiotic development is multifactorial and currently most ICUs are confronted with the challenge of multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrobial multidrug resistance is expanding all over the world, with extreme and pandrug resistance being increasingly encountered, especially in healthcare-associated infections in large highly specialized hospitals. Antibiotic stewardship for critically ill patients translated into the implementation of specific guidelines, largely promoted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, targeted at education to optimize choice, dosage, and duration of antibiotics in order to improve outcomes and reduce the development of resistance. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, meaning the selection of an antibiotic to which the causative pathogen is resistant, is a consistent predictor of poor outcomes in septic patients. Therefore, pharmacokinetically/pharmacodynamically optimized dosing regimens should be given to all patients empirically and, once the pathogen and susceptibility are known, local stewardship practices may be employed on the basis of clinical response to redefine an appropriate regimen for the patient. This review will focus on the most severely ill patients, for whom substantial progress in organ support along with diagnostic and therapeutic strategies markedly increased the risk of nosocomial infections.

Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis

BACKGROUND

Optimal antibiotic treatment for sepsis is imperative. Combining a beta lactam antibiotic with an aminoglycoside antibiotic may provide certain advantages over beta lactam monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to compare beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in patients with sepsis and to estimate the rate of adverse effects with each treatment regimen, including the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics.

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 11); MEDLINE (1966 to 4 November 2013); EMBASE (1980 to November 2013); LILACS (1982 to November 2013); and conference proceedings of the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1995 to 2013). We scanned citations of all identified studies and contacted all corresponding authors. In our previous review, we searched the databases to July 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing any beta lactam monotherapy versus any combination of a beta lactam with an aminoglycoside for sepsis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, superinfections and adverse events. Two review authors independently collected data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the fixed-effect model. We extracted outcomes by intention-to-treat analysis whenever possible.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 69 trials that randomly assigned 7863 participants. Twenty-two trials compared the same beta lactam in both study arms, while the remaining trials compared different beta lactams using a broader-spectrum beta lactam in the monotherapy arm. In trials comparing the same beta lactam, we observed no difference between study groups with regard to all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.30) and clinical failure (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.29). In studies comparing different beta lactams, we observed a trend for benefit with monotherapy for all-cause mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01) and a significant advantage for clinical failure (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.84). No significant disparities emerged from subgroup and sensitivity analyses, including assessment of participants with Gram-negative infection. The subgroup of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections was underpowered to examine effects. Results for mortality were classified as low quality of evidence mainly as the result of imprecision. Results for failure were classified as very low quality of evidence because of indirectness of the outcome and possible detection bias in non-blinded trials. We detected no differences in the rate of development of resistance. Nephrotoxicity was significantly less frequent with monotherapy (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.39). We found no heterogeneity for all these comparisons.We included a small subset of studies addressing participants with Gram-positive infection, mainly endocarditis. We identified no difference between monotherapy and combination therapy in these studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The addition of an aminoglycoside to beta lactams for sepsis should be discouraged. All-cause mortality rates are unchanged. Combination treatment carries a significant risk of nephrotoxicity.

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: the state of the art

The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) fundamentally alters the management of patients at risk to be colonized or infected by such microorganisms. Owing to the limitation in efficacy and potential for toxicity of the alternative agents, many experts recommend using combination therapy instead of monotherapy in CR-KP-infected patients. However, in the absence of well-designed comparative studies, the best combination for each infection type, the continued role for carbapenems in combination therapy and when combination therapy should be started remain open questions. Herein, the authors revise current microbiological and clinical evidences supporting combination therapy for CR-KP infections to address some of these issues.

Risk factors influencing mortality related to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematology-oncology patients

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is of concern in patients with cancer. Antibiotics active against S. maltophilia are rarely used in the treatment of febrile neutropenia, making it important to identify the factors influencing mortality in cancer patients with S. maltophilia infection. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer and hemopathic patients with S. maltophilia infection and assess the factors influencing the mortality. The microbiology laboratory records of Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine Hospital were reviewed to retrospectively identify patients with S. maltophilia infection between January 2007 and June 2011. A total of 38 patients (25 male, 13 female) were eligible for the study. The median age of the patients was 53 years. The underlying disease was hematological malignancy and disorders in 76.3 % (29 cases), solid tumors in 15.8 % (six cases), aplastic anemia in 7.9 % (three cases), while 18.4 % (seven cases) were hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. An indwelling central venous catheter was used in 32 cases (84.2 %). Twenty-seven patients (71.1 %) were neutropenic at the onset of infection. Nine patients (23.7 %) were receiving corticosteroid therapy. The overall 14-day mortality rate was 50 %. Three of the patients received empirical antibacterial treatment, and three HSCT recipients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis, which is active against S. maltophilia. Severe sepsis (OR 13.24, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.62-108.57) and the duration of the treatment (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.60-0.90) were related to death based on logistic regression analysis findings. In immunocompromised hematology-oncology patients with severe sepsis, S. maltophilia should be considered as a possible cause of infection, and should be given effective empirical antibiotic treatment immediately; the antimicrobial spectrum may be narrowed according to results of antibiotic susceptibility test.

β-Lactam plus aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone combination versus β-lactam monotherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a meta-analysis

The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of β-lactam combined with aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone with that of β-lactam monotherapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We searched Scopus and PubMed databases and synthesised the outcomes of the individual studies in a meta-analysis. Both non-randomised studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated outcomes of patients with P. aeruginosa infections receiving treatment with β-lactams alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside or a fluoroquinolone were included. Studies including patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Nineteen articles (eight RCTs) were included (1721 patients with P. aeruginosa infections). Patients receiving combination therapy had no difference in mortality compared with patients receiving β-lactam monotherapy either as definitive (risk ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.22) or as empirical treatment (1.02, 0.78-1.34). In the definitive treatment group, no difference in mortality was found between combination therapy and monotherapy for patients with bacteraemia (0.95, 0.67-1.34) or severe infections (0.96, 0.75-1.24). Patients receiving definitive combination therapy had non-significantly higher clinical cure compared with patients receiving β-lactam monotherapy (1.36, 0.99-1.86). A higher clinical cure rate was observed for patients receiving empirical treatment with combination therapy (1.23, 1.05-1.43). There was no difference in clinical cure either for RCTs (1.29, 0.91-1.83) or for non-randomised studies (1.18, 0.97-1.45). In conclusion, no benefit in mortality was observed in patients receiving combination therapy for P. aeruginosa infections. A well-designed multicentre RCT is warranted to address this important issue.

Outcomes of appropriate empiric combination versus monotherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia

Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is associated with high hospital mortality. Empirical combination therapy is commonly used to increase the likelihood of appropriate therapy, but the benefits of employing >1 active agent have yet to be established. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients receiving appropriate empirical combination versus monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteremia. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of hospitalized adult patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia from 2002 to 2011. The primary endpoint (30-day mortality) was assessed using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for underlying confounding variables. Secondary endpoints of hospital mortality and time to mortality were assessed by Fisher's exact test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. A total of 384 patients were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality was higher for patients receiving inappropriate therapy than for those receiving appropriate empirical therapy (43.8% versus 21.5%; P = 0.03). However, there were no statistical differences in 30-day mortality following appropriate empirical combination versus monotherapy after adjusting for baseline APACHE II scores and lengths of hospital stay prior to the onset of bacteremia (P = 0.55). Observed hospital mortality was 36.6% for patients administered combination therapy, compared with 28.7% for monotherapy patients (P = 0.17). After adjusting for baseline APACHE II scores, the relationship between time to mortality and combination therapy was not statistically significant (P = 0.59). Overall, no significant differences were observed for 30-day mortality, hospital mortality, and time to mortality between combination and monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Empirical combination therapy did not appear to offer an additional benefit, as long as the isolate was susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent.