Opposite effects of mepyramine on JNJ 7777120-induced amelioration of experimentally induced asthma in mice in sensitization and provocation

Opportunities and challenges in the therapeutic exploitation of histamine and histamine receptor pharmacology in inflammation-driven disorders

Inflammation-driven diseases encompass a wide array of pathological conditions characterised by immune system dysregulation leading to tissue damage and dysfunction. Among the myriad of mediators involved in the regulation of inflammation, histamine has emerged as a key modulatory player. Histamine elicits its actions through four rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), named chronologically in order of discovery as histamine H1, H2, H3 and H4 receptors (H1-4R). The relatively low affinity H1R and H2R play pivotal roles in mediating allergic inflammation and gastric acid secretion, respectively, whereas the high affinity H3R and H4R are primarily linked to neurotransmission and immunomodulation, respectively. Importantly, however, besides the H4R, both H1R and H2R are also crucial in driving immune responses, the H2R tending to promote yet ill-defined and unexploited suppressive, protective and/or resolving processes. The modulatory action of histamine via its receptors on inflammatory cells is described in detail. The potential therapeutic value of the most recently discovered H4R in inflammatory disorders is illustrated via a selection of preclinical models. The clinical trials with antagonists of this receptor are discussed and possible reasons for their lack of success described.

Mouse Colonic Epithelial Cells Functionally Express the Histamine H4 Receptor

We hypothesized that, in mice, histamine via the histamine receptor subtype 4 (H₄R) on colon epithelial cells affects epithelial barrier integrity, perturbing physiologic function of the colonic mucosa and thus aggravating the severity of colitis. To test this hypothesis, bone marrow-chimeric mice were generated from H₄R knockout (H₄R^-/-) and wild-type (WT) BALB/cJ mice and subjected to the dextrane sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced acute colitis model. Clinical symptoms and pathohistological derangements were scored. Additionally, total RNA was extracted from either mouse whole-colon homogenates or primary cell preparations enriched for epithelial cells, and gene expression was analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The impact of the H₄R on epithelial barrier function was assessed by measurement of transepithelial electrical resistence of organoid-derived two-dimensional monolayers from H₄R^-/- and WT mice using chopstick electrodes. Bone marrow-chimeric mice with genetic depletion of the H₄R in nonhematopoietic cells exhibited less severe DSS-induced acute colitis symptoms compared with WT mice, indicating a functional proinflammatory expression of H₄R in nonimmune cells of the colon. Analysis of H₄R expression revealed the presence of H₄R mRNA in colon epithelial cells. This expression could be confirmed and complemented by functional analyses in organoid-derived epithelial cell monolayers. Thus, we conclude that the H₄R is functionally expressed in mouse colon epithelial cells, potentially modulating mucosal barrier integrity and intestinal inflammatory reactions, as was demonstrated in the DSS-induced colitis model, in which presence of the H₄R on nonhematopoietic cells aggravated the inflammatory phenotype. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) is functionally expressed on mouse colon epithelial cells, thereby aggravating dextrane sodium sulfate-induced colitis in BALB/cJ mice. Histamine via the H₄R reduces transepithelial electrical resistance of colon epithelial monolayers, indicating a function of H₄R in regulation of epithelial barrier integrity.

Effect of H4R Antagonist N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-Chloro-1H-Indole-2-Carboxamide (Compound A) in a Mouse Model of Allergic Asthma

Context: Allergic asthma is a multifactorial airway disease characterised by chronic lung inflammation and airway remodelling. The histamine H4 receptor involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to the site of inflammation is suggested to be a potential drug target for allergy and asthma. In this study we examined the effect of Compound A, N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamide a H4 receptor antagonist in allergic asthma mice model. Objective: To investigate the anti-asthmatic effect of compound A in in vivo, airway inflammation in ovalbumin (OVA) induced allergic asthma mouse model was used. Methodology: Allergic asthma was induced in Balb/c mice using ovalbumin. BAL fluid was examined for the level of IgE, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IL-17 using ELISA. Furthermore, infiltration of leucocytes by histopathology and effect of compound A on signalling molecules were examined in lung tissue. Results: In mice pre-treatment with compound A (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg) at different concentrations markedly reduced the levels of IgE, Th2 cytokine IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and Th17 cytokine IL-17 in BAL fluid. Histopathological examination of lung tissue showed that compound A was able to reduce the level of inflammatory infiltrates. Furthermore, lung tissue from Compound A treated group shown to down-regulate the levels of signalling molecules such as ERK1/2, Akt, SAPK/JNK and NF-κB compared to OVA treated group. Discussion and conclusion: Taken together our data demonstrates that compound A has shown to block the H4R-mediated allergic inflammation in this allergic asthma mice model and may be used as a molecule to study the function of H4R. Abbreviations: Compound A, N-(2-Aminoethyl)-5-chloro-1H-indol-2-carboxamide; JNJ7777120, 1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine; H₄R: Histamine 4 Receptor; AHR: Airway hyper responsiveness.

A phase 2a study of toreforant, a histamine H4 receptor antagonist, in eosinophilic asthma

BACKGROUND

Data from preclinical and clinical studies support the evaluation of histamine 4 receptor antagonists in the treatment of asthma. Toreforant is a selective histamine 4 receptor antagonist that could be effective in patients with eosinophilic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toreforant in patients with eosinophilic, persistent asthma that was inadequately controlled despite current treatment.

METHODS

In this phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study, 162 eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to placebo or 30 mg of toreforant once daily through week 24 and followed for 4 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second at week 16. Secondary end points included change from baseline at week 16 in postbronchodilator percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, weekly averages of Daytime and Nighttime Asthma Diary Symptom Scores, and weekly average of number of puffs in a day that rescue medication was used.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in pre-bronchodilator percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second at week 16 (difference in least-square means -0.19%; 95% confidence interval -3.01 to 2.64; P = .90). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups at week 16 in changes from baseline in the secondary end points (P ≥ .30). Toreforant was generally well tolerated. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported at any time point.

CONCLUSION

Toreforant, at the dose tested, failed to provide therapeutic benefit in this population of patients with uncontrolled, eosinophilic, persistent asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01823016.

Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study of an H4 R-antagonist (JNJ-39758979) in adults with uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND

The effects of H₄ R antagonists in preclinical asthma models support the study of antagonists of the H₄ R in the treatment of asthma in humans. JNJ-39758979 is a potent and highly selective oral H₄ R antagonist.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the H₄ R-antagonist JNJ-39758979 in adult patients with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen eligible patients were randomly assigned to JNJ-39758979 300 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks in this phase 2a, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Primary efficacy was assessed via week-12 change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁ ). Secondary efficacy assessments included patient-reported outcome (PRO) asthma assessments (Asthma Daily Diary data [AM and PM peak expiratory flow rate, number of puffs of albuterol/salbutamol, the presence of nocturnal awakenings and asthma symptom score]).

RESULTS

The study did not meet the primary end-point. However, nominally significant improvements in pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ were observed with JNJ-39758979 versus placebo at week 12 in pre-specified subgroups with elevated exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils or blood eosinophils at baseline. Nominally significant improvements across PRO assessments were consistently observed in the overall population, as well as in eosinophilic subgroups. Safety, such as adverse event rates, was comparable between JNJ-39758979 and placebo. No serious adverse events were reported. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory values were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings suggest potential benefit of H₄ R antagonists on lung function and asthma control in eosinophilic asthma patients and warrant further evaluation of this mechanism in asthma with eosinophilic inflammation. NCT00946569.

Genetic Mechanisms of Asthma and the Implications for Drug Repositioning

Asthma is a chronic disease that is caused by airway inflammation. The main features of asthma are airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and reversible airway obstruction. The disease is mainly managed using drug therapy. The current asthma drug treatments are divided into two categories, namely, anti-inflammatory drugs and bronchodilators. However, disease control in asthma patients is not very efficient because the pathogenesis of asthma is complicated, inducing factors that are varied, such as the differences between individual patients. In this paper, we delineate the genetic mechanisms of asthma, and present asthma-susceptible genes and genetic pharmacology in an attempt to find a diagnosis, early prevention, and treatment methods for asthma. Finally, we reposition some clinical drugs for asthma therapy, based on asthma genetics.

Clinical Development of Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonists

The discovery of the histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) provided a new avenue for the exploration of the physiological role of histamine, as well as providing a new drug target for the development of novel antihistamines. The first step in this process was the identification of selective antagonists to help unravel the pharmacology of the H₄R relative to other histamine receptors. The discovery of the selective H₄R antagonist JNJ 7777120 was vital for showing a role for the H₄R in inflammation and pruritus. While this compound has been very successful as a tool for understanding the function of the receptor, it has drawbacks, including a short in vivo half-life and hypoadrenocorticism toxicity in rats and dogs, that prevented advancing it into clinical studies. Further research let to the discovery of JNJ 39758979, which, similar to JNJ 7777120, was a potent and selective H₄R antagonist and showed anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic activity preclinically. JNJ 39758979 advanced into human clinical studies and showed efficacy in reducing experimental pruritus and in patients with atopic dermatitis. However, development of this compound was terminated due to the occurrence of drug-induced agranulocytosis. This was overcome by developing another H₄R antagonist with a different chemical structure, toreforant, that does not appear to have this side effect. Toreforant has been tested in clinical studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, or psoriasis. In conclusions there have been many H₄R antagonists reported in the literature, but only a few have been studied in humans underscoring the difficulty in finding ligands with all of the properties necessary for testing in the clinic. Nevertheless, the clinical data to date suggests that H₄R antagonists can be beneficial in treating atopic dermatitis and pruritus.

Role of the Histamine H4-Receptor in Bronchial Asthma

Histamine is a pro-inflammatory mediator with a prominent role in allergic diseases. Antagonists at the histamine receptor subtype 1 are central in anti-allergic therapies, with the exception of allergic asthma, where they are clinically without effect. The latest identified histamine receptor subtype 4, which is expressed mainly in hematopoietic cells, now provides a reasonable target for new therapeutic strategies inhibiting histamine function. The pathophysiology of allergy, esp. allergic asthma, and in its context the effects of antagonists at the histamine receptor subtype 4 in preclinical and clinical settings are discussed in this chapter.

Lack of Histamine H4-Receptor Expression Aggravates TNBS-Induced Acute Colitis Symptoms in Mice

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a growing health problem worldwide, severely affecting patients’ life qualities and life expectancies. Therapeutic options, which are rare and focus on symptoms associated with the disease, suffer from increasing numbers of patients refractory to the established strategies. Thus, in order to generate new therapeutic regimens, the detailed understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms causing IBD is necessary. Histamine is an inflammatory mediator associated with IBD. Four histamine receptors are currently known of which the histamine H₄-receptor (H₄R) has been shown to possess a pro-inflammatory function in several experimental models of inflammatory diseases, including dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. No single model reflects the complexity of human IBD, but each model provides valuable information on specific aspects of IBD pathogenesis. While DSS-induced colitis mostly relies on innate immune mechanisms, trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis rather reflects T-cell mechanisms. Consequently, an observation made in a single model has to be verified in at least one other model. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the effect of genetic blockade of H₄R-signaling in mice subjected to the model of TNBS-induced acute colitis. We analyzed severity and progression of clinical signs of colitis, as well as histopathologic alterations in the colon and local cytokine production. Genetic ablation of H₄R expression worsened clinical signs of acute colitis and histological appearance of colon inflammation after TNBS application. Moreover, TNBS instillation enhanced local synthesis of inflammatory mediators associated with a neutrophilic response, i.e., CXCL1, CXCL2, and interleukin-6. Lastly, also myeloperoxidase concentration, indicative for the presence of neutrophils, was elevated in cola of TNBS-treated mice due to the absence of H₄R expression. Our results indicate an anti-inflammatory role of histamine via H₄R in TNBS-induced acute neutrophilic colitis in mice, thus questioning the strategy of pharmacological H₄R blocked as new therapeutic option for patients suffering from IBD.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors

Histamine is a developmentally highly conserved autacoid found in most vertebrate tissues. Its physiological functions are mediated by four 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) that are all targets of pharmacological intervention. The receptors display molecular heterogeneity and constitutive activity. H1R antagonists are long known antiallergic and sedating drugs, whereas the H2R was identified in the 1970s and led to the development of H2R-antagonists that revolutionized stomach ulcer treatment. The crystal structure of ligand-bound H1R has rendered it possible to design new ligands with novel properties. The H3R is an autoreceptor and heteroreceptor providing negative feedback on histaminergic and inhibition on other neurons. A block of these actions promotes waking. The H4R occurs on immuncompetent cells and the development of anti-inflammatory drugs is anticipated.

Histamine H(1)- and H(4)-receptor signaling cooperatively regulate MAPK activation

The histamine (HA) receptor subtype 1 (H1R) and H4R are expressed on immune cells and contribute to an inflammatory reaction. Both receptor subtypes individually enhance the intracellular concentrations of calcium and regulate the accumulation of cAMP, increase MAPK activity, and regulate expression of e.g., inflammatory genes. In a previous study we characterized and compared signaling pathways of the murine orthologs of the H1R and the H4R recombinantly expressed at comparable levels in HEK 293 cells. In the present study, we aimed at analyzing possible interactions of the signaling pathways emerging at the mH1R and the mH4R. Therefore, we co-expressed both receptor subtypes at comparable levels in HEK 293 cells and investigated HA-induced signaling parameters such as the concentrations of intracellular calcium and cAMP, phosphorylation of the MAPKs p38, ERK 1, and ERK 2, and of the transcription factor CREB, and expression of the immediate early gene EGR-1. We demonstrate that the intracellular concentrations of calcium and cAMP as well as the EGR-1 expression are regulated exclusively via the mH1R. In contrast, both receptor subtypes H1R and H4R synergize in HA-induced MAPK activation. This synergism most probably relies on signaling pathways independent of the second messenger calcium and cAMP. In summary, we provide evidence that the mH1R inhibits or dampens the function of the co-expressed mH4R regarding specific parameters, while other signaling events are regulated cooperatively by the mH1R and the mH4R.

Proinflammatory role of the histamine H4 receptor in dextrane sodium sulfate-induced acute colitis

Millions of people worldwide are suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which severely affects patients' life qualities and even life expectancies. The cause of the ailment is unknown and a profound understanding of the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms is still lacking. The biogenic amine histamine is one of several inflammatory mediators, to which a pathogenetic role in IBD has been attributed. Out of the four known histamine receptors, the histamine H4 receptor (H4R) has been demonstrated to act proinflammatory in experimental models of several inflammatory diseases. In order to evaluate a potential involvement of H4R in IBD we investigated the effect of genetic or pharmacological blockade of H4R-signaling in the model of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. We analysed severity and progression of clinical signs of colitis, as well as histopathologic alterations in the colons and systemic or local cytokine concentrations. Both genetic deficiency and pharmacological blockade of H4R with the selective antagonist JNJ7777120 improved clinical and histological signs of colitis and dampened the inflammatory cytokine response. Our results indicate a proinflammatory role of histamine via H4R in IBD, thus extending the current pathophysiological understanding of IBD and demonstrating the therapeutic potential of selective H4R-antagonists for patients suffering from IBD.

V0162 a new long-acting bronchodilator for treatment of chronic obstructive lung diseases: preclinical and clinical results

Background

Long acting bronchodilators are the standard of care in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of V0162, a novel anticholinergic agent with bronchodilator properties, in preclinical models and in patients with COPD.

Methods

Guinea pigs were used to evaluate the impact of V0162 on the acetylcholine or histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. V0162 was also investigated in an allergic asthma model on ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pig. For clinical investigations, healthy volunteers were included in a dose-escalation, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study to determine the maximal tolerated dose, followed by a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over phase II study in patients with COPD. V0162 was given via inhalation route. The objectives of the phase I/II study were to assess the safety and efficacy of V0162, in terms of bronchodilation and reduction in hyperinflation.

Results

Preclinical results showed that V0162 was able to prevent bronchoconstriction induced either by acetylcholine or histamine. V0162 reversed the bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation caused by ovalbumin challenge in sensitized guinea pigs. In the healthy volunteers study, 88 subjects were enrolled: 66 received V0162 and 22 received placebo. No particular safety concerns were raised. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached and the dose escalation was stopped at 2400 μg. A total of 20 patients with COPD were then enrolled. All patients received a single-dose of V0162 1600 μg and of placebo in two alternating periods. In COPD patients, V0162 demonstrated a significant increase in FEV₁ compared with placebo (148 ± 137 ml vs. 36 ± 151 ml, p = 0.003). This bronchodilatory effect was corroborated by a reduction in hyperinflation. There was a trend toward dyspnea relief (change in visual analog scale at 22 h, −15.1 ± 26.0 mm vs.- 5.3 ± 28.8 mm with placebo, p = 0.054). No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Most common AEs were productive and non-productive cough, dyspnea and pruritus.

Conclusions

V0162 improved pulmonary function and tended to improve dyspnea in patients with COPD over more than 24 h. The slight plasmatic exposure observed might support the good safety profile.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01348555

The histamine H4 receptor: from orphan to the clinic

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) was first noted as a sequence in genomic databases that had features of a class A G-protein coupled receptor. This putative receptor was found to bind histamine consistent with its homology to other histamine receptors and thus became the fourth member of the histamine receptor family. Due to the previous success of drugs that target the H1 and H2 receptors, an effort was made to understand the function of this new receptor and determine if it represented a viable drug target. Taking advantage of the vast literature on the function of histamine, a search for histamine activity that did not appear to be mediated by the other three histamine receptors was undertaken. From this asthma and pruritus emerged as areas of particular interest. Histamine has long been suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but antihistamines that target the H1 and H2 receptors have not been shown to be effective for this condition. The use of selective ligands in animal models of asthma has now potentially filled this gap by showing a role for the H4R in mediating lung function and inflammation. A similar story exists for chronic pruritus associated with conditions such as atopic dermatitis. Antihistamines that target the H1 receptor are effective in reducing acute pruritus, but are ineffective in pruritus experienced by patients with atopic dermatitis. As for asthma, animal models have now suggested a role for the H4R in mediating pruritic responses, with antagonists of the H4R reducing pruritus in a number of different conditions. The anti-pruritic effect of H4R antagonists has recently been shown in human clinical studies, validating the preclinical findings in the animal models. A selective H4R antagonist inhibited histamine-induced pruritus in health volunteers and reduced pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. The history to date of the H4R provides an excellent example of the deorphanization of a novel receptor and the translation of this into clinical efficacy in humans.

The histamine H4 -receptor (H4 R) regulates eosinophilic inflammation in ovalbumin-induced experimental allergic asthma in mice

Via the histamine H4 -receptor (H4 R), histamine promotes the pathogenesis of experimental allergic asthma in mice. Application of H4 R antagonists during sensitization as well as during provocation reduces the severity of the disease. However, the specific cell types functionally expressing H4 R in experimental allergic asthma have not been well characterized in vivo. In this study, we identified the cell type(s) responsible for H4 R activity in experimental asthma and related physiological mechanisms. Using H4 R-deficient mice, we studied the role of H4 R in the sensitization and effector phase. DCs lacking H4 R expression during the in vitro sensitization reaction resulted in effector T cells unable to induce an entire eosinophilic inflammation in the lung upon adoptive transfer in vivo. Recipient mice lacking H4 R expression, which were adoptively transferred with H4 R(+/+) T cells polarized in the presence of H4 R(+/+) DCs, showed reduced signs of inflammation and ameliorated lung function. Here, we provide in vivo evidence that in experimental asthma in mice the H4 R specifically regulates activation of DCs during sensitization, while in the effector phase the H4 R is active in cells involved in the activation of eosinophils, and possibly other cells. A putative therapy targeting the H4 R may be an option for asthma patients developing IL-5-dependent eosinophilia.

Distinct signalling pathways of murine histamine H1- and H4-receptors expressed at comparable levels in HEK293 cells

Histamine (HA) is recognized by its target cells via four G-protein-coupled receptors, referred to as histamine H₁-receptor (H₁R), H₂R, H₃R, and H₄R. Both H₁R and H₄R exert pro-inflammatory functions. However, their signal transduction pathways have never been analyzed in a directly comparable manner side by side. Moreover, the analysis of pharmacological properties of the murine orthologs, representing the main targets of pre-clinical research, is very important. Therefore, we engineered recombinant HEK293 cells expressing either mouse (m)H₁R or mH₄R at similar levels and analyzed HA-induced signalling in these cells. HA induced intracellular calcium mobilization via both mH₁R and mH₄R, with the mH₁R being much more effective. Whereas cAMP accumulation was potentiated via the mH₁R, it was reduced via the mH₄R. The regulation of both second messengers via the H₄R, but not the H₁R, was sensitive to pertussis toxin (PTX). The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) ERK 1/2 were massively activated downstream of both receptors and demonstrated a functional involvement in HA-induced EGR-1 gene expression. The p38 MAPK was moderately activated via both receptors as well, but was functionally involved in HA-induced EGR-1 gene expression only in H₄R-expressing cells. Surprisingly, in this system p38 MAPK activity reduced the HA-induced gene expression. In summary, using this system which allows a direct comparison of mH₁R- and mH₄R-induced signalling, qualitative and quantitative differences on the levels of second messenger generation and also in terms of p38 MAPK function became evident.

The therapeutic potential of histamine receptor ligands in inflammatory bowel disease

In the intestine of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease concentrations of histamine are increased compared to healthy controls. Genetic ablation of histamine production in mice ameliorates the course of experimentally induced colitis. These observations and first pharmacological studies indicate a function of histamine in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. However, a closer examination reveals that available data are highly heterogeneous, limiting the rational design of strategies addressing specific histamine receptor subtypes as possible target for pharmacological interaction. However, very recently first clinical data indicate that antagonism at the histamine receptor subtype H4 provides a beneficial effect in at least the skin. Here, we discuss the available data on histamine effects and histamine receptor subtype functions in inflammatory bowel disease with a special emphasis on the histamine H4-receptor.

Delineating the role of histamine-1- and -4-receptors in a mouse model of Th2-dependent antigen-specific skin inflammation

BACKGROUND

Histamine drives pruritus in allergic skin diseases which clinically constitutes a most disruptive symptom. Skin pathology in allergic skin diseases is crucially influenced by different T-helper subsets. However, the contribution of different histamine-receptors to T-helper cell dependent skin pathology has not been definitively answered. Models which can specifically address the functional role of T-helper subsets and the mediators involved are therefore valuable to gain further insights into molecular pathways which contribute to allergic skin disease. They might also be helpful to probe amendable therapeutic interventions such as histamine-receptor antagonism.

OBJECTIVE

Establishing an adoptive transfer model for antigen-specific Th cells, we aimed to delineate the role of histamine H1- and H4-receptors in Th2-dependent skin inflammation.

METHODS

In-vitro differentiated and OVA primed Th2 cells were adoptively transferred into congenic recipient mice. In vivo treatment with specific histamine H1- and H4-receptor antagonists was performed to analyze the contribution of these histamine-receptors to Th2-dependent skin pathology in our model. Analysis four days after epicutaneous challenge comprised skin histology, flow cytometric detection of transferred T-helper cells and analysis of antigen-cytokine profiles in skin-draining lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Use of specific H1- and H4-receptor antagonists revealed a crucial role for H1- and H4-receptors for Th2 migration and cytokine secretion in a Th2-driven model of skin inflammation. While H1- and H4-receptor antagonists both reduced Th2 recruitment to the site of challenge, local cytokine responses in skin-draining lymph nodes were only reduced by the combined application of H1- and H4-receptor antagonists and mast cell counts remained altogether unchanged by either H1R-, H4R- or combined antagonism.

CONCLUSION

Our model demonstrates a role for H1- and H4-receptors in Th2 cell infiltration and cytokine secretion in allergic skin diseases and suggests further studies to evaluate these findings for therapeutic approaches.

Histamine induces chemotaxis and phagocytosis in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages and RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells via histamine H4-receptor

OBJECTIVE

Expression and function of histamine H4-receptor, an immunomodulatory receptor involved in inflammatory diseases, on murine macrophages, which are vital for immunity, were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The expression pattern of histamine receptors on bone marrow-derived macrophages of BALB/c mice and on RAW 264.7 cells was studied at the mRNA level by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The functional relevance of histamine receptors was investigated by analyzing histamine-induced chemotaxis and phagocytosis in the presence of histamine receptor antagonists mepyramine (histamine H1-receptor), famotidine (histamine H2-receptor), thioperamide (histamine H3/4-receptors) and JNJ7777120 (histamine H4-receptor).

RESULTS

Both bone marrow-derived macrophages and RAW 264.7 cells express mRNA for histamine H1-receptor and histamine H4-receptor. Residual amounts of histamine H2-receptor mRNA are found in bone marrow-derived macrophages only. In both cellular models, histamine induced chemotaxis and phagocytic activity, which was reduced by thioperamide as well as by JNJ 7777120, but not by mepyramine or famotidine.

CONCLUSION

In murine bone marrow-derived macrophages and RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells histamine H4-receptor mediates chemotaxis and phagocytic activity.

The histamine H4 receptor mediates inflammation and Th17 responses in preclinical models of arthritis

Objective

The histamine H₄ receptor (H₄R) has been shown to drive inflammatory responses in models of asthma, colitis and dermatitis, and in these models it appears to affect both innate and adaptive immune responses. In this study, we used both H₄R-deficient mice and a specific H₄R antagonist, JNJ 28307474, to investigate the involvement of the H₄R in mouse arthritis models.

Methods

H₄R-deficient mice and wild-type mice administered the H₄R antagonist were studied in models of collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). The impact on Th17 cells was assessed by restimulation of inguinal lymphocytes in the disease or immunisation models and with in vitro stimulation of whole blood.

Results

Both H₄R-deficient mice and mice treated with the H₄R antagonist exhibited reduced arthritis disease severity in both CAIA and CIA models. This was evident from the reduction in disease score and in joint histology. In the CIA model, treatment with the H₄R antagonist reduced the number of interleukin (IL)-17 positive cells in the lymph node and the total production of IL-17. Th17 cell development in vivo was reduced in H₄R-deficient mice or in mice treated with an H₄R antagonist. Finally, treatment of both mouse and human blood with an H₄R antagonist reduced the production of IL-17 when cells were stimulated in vitro.

Conclusions

These results implicate the H₄R in disease progression in arthritis and in the production of IL-17 from Th17 cells. This work supports future clinical exploration of H₄R antagonists for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Luciferase reporter gene assay on human, murine and rat histamine H4 receptor orthologs: correlations and discrepancies between distal and proximal readouts

The investigation of the (patho)physiological role of the histamine H4 receptor (H4R) and its validation as a possible drug target in translational animal models are compromised by distinct species-dependent discrepancies regarding potencies and receptor subtype selectivities of the pharmacological tools. Such differences were extremely pronounced in case of proximal readouts, e. g. [(32)P]GTPase or [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays. To improve the predictability of in vitro investigations, the aim of this study was to establish a reporter gene assay for human, murine and rat H4Rs, using bioluminescence as a more distal readout. For this purpose a cAMP responsive element (CRE) controlled luciferase reporter gene assay was established in HEK293T cells, stably expressing the human (h), the mouse (m) or the rat (r) H4R. The potencies and efficacies of 23 selected ligands (agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists) were determined and compared with the results obtained from proximal readouts. The potencies of the examined ligands at the human H4R were consistent with reported data from [(32)P]GTPase or [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays, despite a tendency toward increased intrinsic efficacies of partial agonists. The differences in potencies of individual agonists at the three H4R orthologs were generally less pronounced compared to more proximal readouts. In conclusion, the established reporter gene assay is highly sensitive and reliable. Regarding discrepancies compared to data from functional assays such as [(32)P]GTPase and [(35)S]GTPγS binding, the readout may reflect multifactorial causes downstream from G-protein activation, e.g. activation/amplification of or cross-talk between different signaling pathways.

The dual H3/4R antagonist thioperamide does not fully mimic the effects of the 'standard' H4R antagonist JNJ 7777120 in experimental murine asthma

Histamine is detected in high concentrations in the airways during an allergic asthma response. In a murine model of allergic asthma, the histamine H4 receptor (H4R)-selective ligand JNJ 7777120 reduces asthma-like symptoms. A sole antagonistic function of JNJ 7777120 at the murine H4R has, however, been questioned in the literature. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed at analyzing the effects of JNJ 7777120 in comparison to that of the H3/4R-selective antagonist thioperamide. Experimental murine asthma was induced by sensitization and provocation of BALB/c mice with ovalbumine (OVA). JNJ 7777120, thioperamide, or JNJ 5207852, an H3R-selective antagonist which was used to dissect H3R- and H4R-mediated activities of thioperamide, were injected subcutaneously during sensitization and effects were analyzed after provocation. Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed shortest t1/2 values in both plasma and lung tissue and lowest maximal concentration in lung tissue for JNJ 7777120 in comparison to thioperamide and JNJ 5207852. Nevertheless, JNJ 7777120 reduced serum titers of allergen-specific (anti-OVA) IgE, inflammatory infiltrations in lung tissue, and eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. In contrast, thioperamide reduced only eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, while anti-OVA IgE concentrations and lung infiltrations remained unaffected. JNJ 5207852 had no effect on these parameters. JNJ 7777120 provides beneficial effects in experimental murine asthma, which, however, could only partially be mimicked by thioperamide, despite more favorable pharmacokinetics. Thus, whether these effects of JNJ 7777120 are entirely attributable to an antagonistic activity at the murine H4R or whether an agonistic activity is also involved has to be reconsidered.